4. From Methods to Principles version 23.09 - meta.narr.de · PDF fileChapter 4: From methods...
-
Upload
nguyendang -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
4
Transcript of 4. From Methods to Principles version 23.09 - meta.narr.de · PDF fileChapter 4: From methods...
Teaching English4. From methods to principles
Nancy Grimm – Michael Meyer – Laurenz Volkmann
0. Table of contents
1. Approach – method – technique
2. Teacher-orientation
2.1 Grammar-Translation Method: the knowledge of rules2.2 Direct Method: situated listening and speaking2.3 Audiolingual/Audiovisual Method: habit formation
3. Student-orientation
3.1 Communicative Language Teaching: authentic communication
3.2 Task-based Language Teaching: problem-solving3.3 Collaborative and Participatory Methods: social and
critical agency
4. Subject-orientation: Bilingual Teaching or Content and Language Integrated Learning
5. Age and stage: early language learning and transition
6. Individual differences and factors
7. Postmethod principles in a nutshell
8. Recommended reading
9. Acknowledgments
Chapter 4: From methods to principles 2
Discuss:
Take a look at the cartoon and spell out the problems of learning and teaching English at the beginner level. Find similarities and differences between the situation in the cartoon and your most enjoyable and successful experience of learning English. Could your experience serve as a model for learning and teaching English?
3Chapter 4: From methods to principles
1. Approach – method – technique
Approach
theory about principles & functions of language, learning, education
Method
roles of teachers & learners, content, material, activities
Technique
smallest step in ordered sequence of procedure
Good teaching needs to arrive at a fit between principles, goals, methods, and content, as well as the context and individuals involved in teaching and learning.
1. Approach – method – technique 4
2.1 Grammar-Translation Method:
the knowledge of rules
17th to 20th centuries
2. Teacher-orientation 5
� Grammar and vocabulary
� explicit and teacher-fronted instruction
� Roles of teacher and student
� teacher = master, student = apprentice
� Comparison and contrast of L1 and L2
� highlighting the particular structures of the L1 and L2
� Declarative knowledge, accuracy
� rules and patterns explicitly taught, memorized
� Translating discrete written samples
� models of good language
� preparing learners to read texts from the target culture
� writing compositions: grasp of the target language and culture
� Canonical literary, philosophical texts
� cultivation of the individual
2.1 Grammar-Translation Method:
the knowledge of rules
3. Teacher-orientation 6
Discussing the methodListening &
speaking
neglected
Vocabulary &
grammar first
Ideas of interest
second
Grammatical
rules ≠ correct
language
output
Instruction in
mother
tongue
2.2 Direct Method: situated listening and
speaking
Late 19th century until today
2. Teacher-orientation 7
� Training in what learners actually need
� oral communication skills
� More ‘natural’
� ‘direct’ use of target language as medium of instruction
� Objects, pictures, demonstrations
� directly connecting words with meaning
� Vocabulary
� chunks and sentences
� Grammar
� not central
� inductive: from examples to rule
� Oral skills
� imitation, immediate correction of errors
� embedded in everyday situations
2.2 Direct Method: situated listening and
speaking
Example
2. Teacher-orientation 8
Teacher (T) to students (S): ‘Let’s suppose we are in New York City and have heard about delicious Southern food at Sylvia’s Soul Food in Harlem. Let’s have a look at what’s on the menu and make a reservation for the weekend.’
� S google the restaurant, read the online menu; S ask T to help them out with the kind of food on offer
� S talk about which dishes they might like or dislike
� S simulate a phone call
� place a reservation
� get online directions about the location
� discuss the best way of getting there
� role play
� ordering meals
� practicing conventional expressions: ‘I will have …,’ ‘I think I will go for …,’ ‘I would like to order …’
2.2 Direct Method: situated listening and
speaking
3. Student-orientation 9
Discussing the methodNeglects
reading &
writing
Everyday
language
Conceptual
schemata
Ignores
different
cultural frames
L1 – L2
Complex
grammatical
concepts?
2.3 Audiolingual / Audiovisual Method:
habit formation
1950s-1960s
2. Teacher-orientation 10
� Language as formal system of sounds, words, sentences (Structural Linguistics) and habit formation (Behaviorism)
� imitating / practicing sounds, words, and syntactic patterns
� habitualization
� Listening, speaking in dialogs preferred to reading, writing
� Instruction
� monolingual teaching: L1 should not interfere with habit formation in L2
� stimulus – response – reinforcement
� correct usage: positive feedback
� mistake: immediate correction
� Input
� teacher, audio files: language model
� language laboratory: repeating, practicing dialogs
� Practicing
� rote learning, repetition drills, transformation exercises, substitution drills
2.3 Audiolingual / Audiovisual Method:
habit formation
� Repetition drill
� Chain drill
� Transformation drill
� Single-slot substitution drills
2. Teacher-orientation 11
Identify the kind of drills and explain their functions in this lesson for early beginners:
�After an introduction to animals on a farm, the teacher (T) plays the song “The Farmer Takes a Wife” to the students (S).
�T sings the song line by line and all the S repeat the lines.
�T sings the song line by line and individual S repeat the line one-by-one.
�T sings the song line by line but leaves out the object of the first line and later the subject of the following line and has the class fill in the words: ‘The farmer takes a […]. The […] takes a […].’
�T says: ‘I like horses. I don’t like rats.’ T asks an individual S which animals he/she likes and dislikes. S responds and asks the same question of the S beside her. This continues until all S have had the opportunity both to respond and to ask their neighbor the question.
2.3 Audiolingual / Audiovisual Method:
habit formation
3. Student-orientation 12
Discussing the methodLittle room for
flexibility &
cultural
knowledge
Time for
practicing
Quick results for
beginners
Ignores learners’
cognitive &
emotional
needs
Neglects
development of
Interlanguage and
language
awareness
2.3 Audiolingual / Audiovisual Method:
habit formation
Audiovisual method (1960s)
2. Teacher-orientation 13
� Adding visualization and contextualization of dialog through visual media
� Procedure:
� presentation of sequence of pictures before corresponding utterances are played
� explanation, aiming at global understanding of dialog through
� pointing, imitation, paraphrasing
� imitation of recorded utterances
� practice pronunciation and phrases
� exploitation of input
� questions and answers, role play
� learners’ transposition of dialog to a new topic or situation
Reinfried 2004: 61-64
2.3 Audiolingual / Audiovisual Method:
habit formation
3. Student-orientation 14
Discussing the methodListening &
speaking before
reading &
writing
Uses more
visualized and
situated dialogs
Ignores
motivational &
practical needs
Rigid
proceeding
Disregards
language
awareness
3.1 Communicative Language Teaching:
authentic communication
Focus on
� meaningful & appropriate communication
� flexibility
� language awareness
� fluency & comprehensibility before accuracy
3. Student-orientation 15
� Communicative competence: the ability
� to interact in meaningful ways
� to express one’s intentions in a socially appropriate form in specific situations and within a framework of cultural norms
� Basic principles
� Communication is the means to and the purpose of language learning.
� Conveying meaning is the aim of communication.
� Meaning should be negotiated among learners with little intervention by teachers.
3.1 Communicative Language Teaching: authentic communication
163. Student-orientation
based on Canale & Swain 1980, Canale 2013
3.1 Communicative Language Teaching: authentic communication
Strong CLT
� Uses communication as the means of learning how to communicate
� covering shopping as a topic, then performing a role play
Weak CLT
� Teaches the linguistic means of communication in order to facilitate communication
� offering learners notions and
functions to express intentions
� ‘May I borrow your pen, please?’
� politeness
173. Student-orientation
3.1 Communicative Language Teaching:
authentic communication
Proceeding
3. Student-orientation 18
� From simplified, comprehensible input (with focus on a particular new structure) to more authentic input
� Time
� for practicing authentic communication
� negotiating meaning in interaction
� Address learners’ needs
� interest in talking or writing about a relevant topic
3.1 Communicative Language Teaching:
authentic communication
Proceeding in textbooks
3. Student-orientation 19
� Presentation
� introduction of a topic with pictures and texts (specific forms and speech functions)
� Practice
� exercises that focus on language form
� Production
� tasks addressing specific skills
� aiming at using specific functions in situated
communication
� Metacognitive reflection
� on communicative or learning strategies
� Further practice and differentiation
� additional material or tasks
Compare and evaluate the units on a topic of your choice, such as pets, friends, or sports, in two textbooks for grade 5 from different publishers:
1. How do they address the learners’ interests? 2. Is the input appropriate or inappropriate, didactic or authentic?3. Which vocabulary, speech functions, and communicative competences would you need to express yourself in the situated tasks? 4. Do the tasks promote both the practice of relevant speech functions and authentic communication at the same time? 5. Which of the material and activities would you select if you were to teach the unit? Would you adapt material and tasks or add others?
203. Student-orientation
3.1 Communicative Language Teaching:
authentic communication
3. Student-orientation 21
Discussing the method
Effective verbal
& non-verbal
commu-
nication
Language
awareness
Often TTT
& IRE prevail
Meaning &
sociocultural
appropriate-
ness
Functions
&
notions
3.2 Task-based Language Teaching:
problem-solving
Focus on
� communicative tasks
3. Student-orientation 22
� Often considered a strong version of CLT
� authentic and ‘natural’ language learning
� learner-driven interaction
� But TBLT avoids practice of specific forms
� more comprehensive and holistic tasks
� Tasks focus on
� meaningful and appropriate interaction
� how to travel to New York, where to stay, what to do there
� process- and product-oriented performance
� Learner as social agent
3.2 Task-based Language Teaching:
problem-solving
Task as a work plan vs. task as a process
3. Student-orientation 23
adapted from Ellis 2003: 244, 257-58, 276-78; Ellis 2012: 200-02; Keller 2013: 77
3.2 Task-based Language Teaching:
problem-solving
TBLT and errors
3. Student-orientation 24
� Focus on meaning risks fossilization of errors
� Prevent fossilization by
� proactive focus on form
� anticipating learners’ errors
� providing input that creates awareness of problems before output
� reactive focus on form after output
� intermittent
� retrospective
� Assessment
� measured in relation to subject content
� multidimensional (reliability, validity)
� complement by discrete-item tests
3.2 Task-based Language Teaching:
problem-solving
3. Student-orientation 25
Discussing the methodAuthentic
learner-driven
interaction
Practical
problem-
solving
Holistic &
comprehensive
learning
Time?
Accuracy?
3.3 Collaborative and Participatory Methods: social and critical agency
What are the benefits and problems of group work? Consider the potential effects on cognitive, social, and language learning. What is your preferred role in groups (e. g., leader, questioner, or mediator)? How do you support others, and what do you learn from them? What is necessary to improve the cognitive, social, and linguistic effects of group work?
263. Student-orientation
3.3 Collaborative and Participatory Methods:
social and critical agency
Collaborative Method
focuses on cooperation
3. Student-orientation 27
� Interaction, controversy, cooperation
� Cooperation before competition
� reasoned judgments
� higher-level reasoning
� critical thinking processes
� Structured controversy
� negotiating pros and cons
� respectful but challenging controversy
� involving learners
� stimulating cognitive processing, social skills
� facilitating greater mastery and retention of subject matter
� facilitating greater ability to generalize the principles learned to a wider variety of situations
3.3 Collaborative and Participatory Methods:
social and critical agency
3. Student-orientation 28
Positive
inter-
dependence
Face-to-face
promotive
interaction
Individual
accountability
Social
skills
Principles of teamwork
Group processing
3.3 Collaborative and Participatory Methods:
social and critical agency
3. Student-orientation 29
Discussing the method Sociopolitical &
educational:
citizen
Social skills:
cooperation vs.
competition
Heterogeneous
learners vs.
groups
Cognitive
Processing &
critical
thinking
Language
learning?
3.3 Collaborative and Participatory Methods:
social and critical agency
Participatory or Critical Method – focus on
� participation
� critical agency
3. Student-orientation 30
� Insights into politics of power, language, and knowledge
� Learner participation
� topics of education
� relevance for life � motivation
� improving their living conditions and society
� Raising awareness
� social injustice
� economic discrepancies
� Empowering learners
� change inequality and discrimination
� Critical discourse analysis
� bias often implied in language use
� manipulation & domination
� ‘human capital’, ‘problem of migrants’
3.3 Collaborative and Participatory Methods:
social and critical agency
3. Student-orientation 31
Discussing the method
Focus on
learner issues:
motivation
Participation &
empowerment
Critical
incidents &
touchy issues:
trust?
Progressive
political
agendaGraded
input &
learning?
4. Subject-orientation: Bilingual Teaching or Content and Language Integrated Learning
324. Subject-orientation
Short-term
intensive
exposure
Long-term
immersion
programs
Bilingual Teaching or CLIL
4. Subject-orientation: Bilingual Teaching or
Content and Language Integrated Learning
‘Two for the price of one’?
4. Subject-orientation 33
� Bilingual speaker
� BICS
� CALP
� Teaching academic subjects in L2
� but: concepts & subject-specific discourse need to be learned in both L1 & L2
� problem of interference � raise awareness of different conceptual mappings in different Ls: ‘bird’, ‘friend’
� CLIL in Europe
� political interest: advancing intercultural understanding
� economic interest: applied knowledge in FLs
� educational interest: boosting language skills
4. Subject-orientation: Bilingual Teaching or Content and Language Integrated Learning – Implementation in Germany
Bilingualer Zug
� More intensive language classes in grades 5 & 6
� Continuous teaching of several subjects in the L2 from grade 7 until end of school
Bilinguale Module
� Primary school: topics of interest � ‘animals and pets,’ ‘the seasons,’ ‘my home and town’
� Secondary school: teaching topics in L1 or L2 in one subject � ‘the British Empire’ in English and ‘Fascism’ in German
4. Subject-orientation 34
4. Subject-orientation: Bilingual Teaching or Content and Language Integrated Learning – principles
354. Subject-orientation
Principles
Double focus
Cross-curricular
Language across
curriculumActive, co-operative,
task-based, holistic
Scaffol-ding
Concepts and skills
Principles
Compre-hensible input & output
Authen-ticity
Message before
accuracy
Media literacy
Learner strategies
Raising language
awareness
cf. Mehisto et al. 2008: 29, 69, 138-71
4. Subject-orientation: Bilingual Teaching or Content and Language Integrated Learning
Research British online newspapers, British and German historical sources on the Great War (ErsterWeltkrieg), and watch the episode Blackadder Goes Forth from the British satire in order to come up with arguments for and against the British celebrations of the beginning (!) of the Great War in 2014. Select and critically reflect on material that highlights different perspectives within Great Britain and between British and German views of the Great War. Reflect on the difference between this comparative approach and the idea of a modular concept that teaches one topic in one language and from ‘one’ cultural point of view. With regard to the principles mentioned above, suggest tasks and materials for working on the topic in grades 11 or 12.
364. Subject-orientation
5. Age and stage: early language learning and
transition
5. Age and stage 37
The earlier, the better’?
Great capa-city to
acquire Ls
Little expo-sure,
practice
5. Age and stage: early language learning and
transition
5. Age and stage 38
Goals
Positive attitude
Communi-cation skills
Learning strategies
Confidence & self-
efficacy
5. Age and stage: early language learning and transition – principles
39
Principles
Moti-vation
Compre-hensible
input
Rich input
Qualifying L2
communi-cation only if necessary
Address-ing prior
know-ledge
Metalin-guisticknow-ledge
Principles
Creative Inter-
language
Accurate pronunci-
ation
Tolerating structural
errorsAlterna-
ting procee-
dings
Authentic speech produc-
tion
Positive atmos-phere
5. Age and stage
5. Age and stage: early language learning and transition
40
Tra
nsi
tio
n Primary school teachers
Secondary school teachers
Students
5. Age and stage
“neglect learner-
orientation,
motivation, and the
knowledge acquired so
far”
“have to start all over
again because the
children only play and
do not learn anything
of use”
“exciting, but a change
of school, peer groups,
teachers, methods,
subjects”
5. Age and stage: early language learning and transition - differences
415. Age and stage
5. Age and stage: early language learning and transition – narrowing the gap
425. Age and stage
6. Individual differences and factors
6. Individual differences and factors 43
Impact factors on academic achievement
Structural conditions
Individual Learner
Achievement
We should focus
on the greatest
source of variance
that can make the
difference – the
teacher. – John Hattie
≠
Postmethod concept
6. Individual differences and factors – pedagogical principles facilitating achievement
44
Setting a personal example and inspiring (life-long) learning
Creating a safe, caring, positive atmosphere and good relationships
Reckoning with heterogeneity in terms of aptitude, skills, and motivation
Diagnosing preconceptions, competences, and needs
Stimulating motivation
Defining specific, proximate, and realistic objectives
6. Individual differences and factors
cf. Hattie 2009: 33-36, 62-70, 247; Riemer 2010: 168-70
6. Individual differences and factors – pedagogical principles facilitating achievement
45
Selecting multiple and varied topics, methods, and media
Clearly structuring the process of lessons
Providing comprehensible, contextualized, and salient input
Designing clear, activating, and challenging tasks
Offering choices and helping students
Providing much time on task
6. Individual differences and factors
cf. Hattie 2009: 33-36, 62-70, 247; Riemer 2010: 168-70
6. Individual differences and factors – pedagogical principles facilitating achievement
46
Fostering confidence, responsibility, autonomy, and cooperation
Making learners observe peer models of successful learning
Giving feedback that connects progress to effort and builds self-confidence
Providing clear success criteria and developing appropriate tests
Supporting remedial learning
6. Individual differences and factors
cf. Hattie 2009: 33-36, 62-70, 247; Riemer 2010: 168-70
6. Individual differences and factors – interrelated factors
476. Individual differences and factors
adapted from Dörnyei & Skehan 2003: 619; Dörnyei 2010: 249; Schlak 2010: 258; Ellis 2012: 308-16
6. Individual differences and factors
Recall particularly motivating and demotivating learning experiences. Reflect on individual and contextual factors of influence. Establish a list of recommendations of what to do and what to avoid as a learner and a teacher to stimulate and maintain motivation.
486. Individual differences and factors
6. Individual differences and factors – motivation as dynamic system
496. Individual differences and factors
adapted from Dörnyei & Skehan 2003: 619; Dörnyei 2004: 429-30; Riemer 2010: 171
6. Individual differences and factors
Look at every item in the dynamic system of motivation: reflect on your strengths and your weaknesses and mark these. Think about what you can do to improve your own cognition/motivation. Work on your three most important weaknesses and monitor your progress. Discuss with your peers which topics and activities would stimulate your motivation.
506. Individual differences and factors
Recommended reading
Bach, Gerhard & Johannes-P. Timm, eds. (2013). Englischunterricht:
Grundlagen und Methoden einer handlungsorientierten
Unterrichtspraxis. 5th ed. Tuebingen: Francke.
Hallet, Wolfgang & Frank G. Königs, eds. (2010). Handbuch
Fremdsprachendidaktik. Seelze-Velber: Klett/Kallmeyer.
Hattie, John (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact
on Learning. London et al.: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Marti Anderson (2011). Techniques & Principles in Language Teaching. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter 4: From methods to principles 51
Acknowledgments
Canale, Michael (2013). From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. In: Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt, eds. Language and Communication. 7th ed. London et al: Routledge, 2-27.
Canale, Michael & Merrill Swain (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. In: Applied Linguistics 1.1, 1-47.
Dörnyei, Zoltán (2004). Motivation. In Michael Byram, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge, 425-32.
Dörnyei, Zoltán (2010). The Relationship between Language Aptitude and Language Learning Motivation: Individual Differences from a Dynamic Systems Perspective. In: Ernesto Macaro, ed. Continuum Companion to Second Language Acquisition. London: Continuum, 247-67.
Dörnyei, Zoltán & Peter Skehan (2003). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. In: Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long, eds. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 589-630.
Ellis, Rod (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, Rod (2012). Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hattie, John (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London et al.: Routledge.
Keller, Stefan D. (2013). Kompetenzorientierter Englischunterricht. Berlin: Cornelsen Scriptor.
Mehisto, Peeter; David Marsh & María Jesús Frigols (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan.
Reinfried, Marcus (2004). Audio-visual Language Teaching. In: Michael Byram, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning. London et al.: Routledge, 61-64.
Riemer, Claudia (2010). Motivation. In: Wolfang Hallet & Frank G. Königs, eds. Handbuch Fremdsprachendidaktik. Seelze-Velber: Klett/Kallmeyer, 168-73.
Schlak, Torsten (2010). Sprachlerneignung. In: Wolfang Hallet & Frank G. Königs, eds. Handbuch Fremdsprachendidaktik. Seelze-Velber: Klett/Kallmeyer, 257-61.
52Chapter 4: From methods to principles
Acknowledgments
The cartoons at the beginning of each ppt were designed by Frollein Motte, 2014. If not otherwise indicated, the copyright of the figures lies with the authors. The complete titles of the sources can be found in the references to the units unless given below. All of the websites were checked on 10 September 2014.
� Slides 6, 9, 12, 14, 22, 25, 29, 31: Open Clipart Vectors, https://pixabay.com/en/comments-discussion-esperanto-151907/
� Slide 10: The New Language Laboratory, 1970, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_New_Language_Laboratory,_1970.jpg
� Slide 16: Model of communicative competence, based on Canale & Swain 1980, Canale 2013
� Slide 23: Methodology and principles of the task as work plan, adapted from Ellis 2003: 244, 257-58, 276-78; Ellis 2012: 200-02; Keller 2013: 77
� Slide 28: Working together teamwork puzzle concept, https://www.flickr.com/photos/lumaxart/2137737248
� Slide 36: Left to right – Tim McInnerny, Stephen Fry, Hugh Laurie (back), Rowan Atkinson, Tony Robinson (front) in Blackadder Goes Forth, (original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackadder_Goes_Forth#/media/File:Ba4.jpg (original source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/content/images/2007/02/22/trench_1600_1600x1200.jpg)
� Slide 37, 38, 40 (adapted): Students in line with teacher, http://teachingintheprimarygrades.blogspot.de/2013/09/hallway-procedures.html
� Slide 40: Sign of different school types on a school complex in Germany, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Germany#/media/File:Schulen_Wegweiser.jpg; teacher, https://pixabay.com/en/teacher-bookworm-glasses-professor-359311
� Slide 42: http://www.hsslive.in/2014/08/higher-secondary-general-transfer-2014.html
� Slide 47: Individual learner differences, adapted from Dörnyei & Skehan 2003: 619; Dörnyei 2010: 249; Schlak 2010: 258; Ellis 2012: 308-16
� Slide 49: Dynamic system of motivation, adapted from Dörnyei & Skehan 2003: 619; Dörnyei 2004: 429-30; Riemer 2010: 171
53Chapter 4: From methods to principles