300 W.m-2 150 W.m-2 New approaches with low...
Transcript of 300 W.m-2 150 W.m-2 New approaches with low...
New approaches with low environmental impact to inactivate microorganisms in aquaculture systems
Departamento de Biologia e CESAM Universidade de Aveiro
CESAM
Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar
www.cesam.ua.pt
Adelaide Almeida [email protected]
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
Why new therapies in aquaculture
Important economic activity around the world
Cultured fish subjected to many microbial infections (high mortality and financial losses)
High incidence of drug-resistant strains
Few antibiotics licensed to aquaculture use
Vaccination not likely in fish larvae
is practically unfeasible to handle these small animals
fish larvae do not have the ability to develop specific immunity
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
New approaches
Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy
Phage Therapy
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy Non-antibiotic approach that combines:
a nontoxic photosensitizer
visible light
oxygen
Relies on the experience of the treatment of malignant tumors by PDT
To generate highly reactive oxygen species
(ROS):
singlet oxygen
superoxide and hydroxyl radical
Irreversibly oxidize microorganism vital constituents resulting in lethal damage
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
Advantages of PDI Non-target specificity (bacteria, viruses, fungi and protozoa)
Lack of development of resistance
multi-target process
main targets are external structures (PS does not need to enter in the microorganism)
antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase) protect against some ROS, not against singlet oxygen (the main ROS of PDT )
singlet oxygen inactivate these enzymes
Independent of antibiotic-resistance spectrum (resistant microorganisms are equally as susceptible as their native counterparts)
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
Recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli
strain as model
Three photosensitizer concentrations
(0.5 µM, 1.0 µM and 5.0 µM)
Two light intensities (40 and 600 Wm-2)
Light exposure time (270 minutes)
Bacteria concentration (106 CFU mL-1)
Controls (light and dark controls)
Bioluminescence measured in a luminometer
R² = 0,9838
R² = 0,9925
0
2
4
6
8
10
-5 0 5 10L
og
CF
U m
L-1
Log RLU
Efficiency of porphyrins to inactivate bacteria
Approach
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
Results Tetra-Py+-Me Tri-Py+-Me-CO2H Tri-Py+-Me-PF
600 m
Wcm
-2
40 m
Wcm
-2
Legend: x light control, dark control, 0.5µM, 1.0 µM, 5.0 µM
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
Development of resistance in bacteria
PS concentrations 5.0 µM
Light intensity 40 mWcm-2
Exposure cycles of 120 minutes (modest inactivation)
After each cycle sub-samples of 1 mL were aseptically taken and plated
Three colonies were picked for produce new cultures
Repetition 10 times
Controls (light and dark controls)
Approach
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
Recovery of microbial viability
PS concentrations 5.0 µM
Light intensity 40 mWcm-2
Exposure of 120 minutes (modest inactivation)
Samples protected from light and aliquots collected at 24, 48 and 72, 120 and 168 h after treatment, bioluminescence signal measured
Controls (light and dark controls)
Results Escherichia coli
Variation of the concentration of
microorganisms after irradiation in ten
consecutive cycles. N0 and N colony
counts before and after the irradiation,
respectively.
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
4,5 28,5 52,5 76,5 100,5124,5148,5172,5196,5L
og
Bio
lum
ine
sc
ên
cia
(U
RL
)
Tempo de incubação (h)
Controlo claro; Tri-Py+-Me-PF 5uM; Controlo escuro
Effect of physical and chemical properties of environmental waters in PDI
Recombinant bioluminescent Vibrio fischeri as model
PS concentrations 5.0 µM
Light intensities 40 mWcm-2 and solar light
Exposure cycles of 270 minutes
After each cycle sub-samples of 1 mL were
aseptically taken and light was measured
Effect of temperature, salinity, pH, O2,
organic matter
Controls (light and dark controls)
Approach
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270
Log
Bio
lum
ines
cen
ce (
RLU
)
Irradiation time (min)
Photoinactivation assay of V. fischeri with and without stirring for [O2] monitoring (values in mg/L)
Light control
Dark control (5µM)
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270
Lo
g B
iolu
min
escen
ce
(RL
U)
Irradiation time (min)
Photoinactivation assay of V. fischeri at different temperatures
10°C
15°C
20°C
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270
Log
Bio
lum
ines
cen
ce (
RLU
)
Irradiation time (min)
Photoinactivation assay of V. fischeri at different pH values of the suspension medium
pH=6.5
pH=7.0
pH=8.0
pH=8.5
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270Log
Bio
lum
ines
cen
ce (
RLU
)
Irradiation time (min)
Photoinactivation assay of V. fischeri at different concentrations of NaCl in the suspension medium
10 g/LNaCl
20 g/LNaCl
Aquaculture water under 4 mW cm-2 irradiation. A: non-filtered
portion; B: portion filtered by 0.7 µm membrane; C: portion filtered
by 0.2 µm membrane. Light control (), dark control with 50 µM of
porphyrin (), 10 µM (), 20 µM () and 50 µM ().
Aquaculture sample under different light sources.
A: Artificial white light (4 mW cm-2). B: Solar light
(40 mW cm-2). Light control (), dark control with 20
µM of porphyrin (), 20 µM ().
Maio 2010 Junho 2010
Outubro 2010
Re-utilization of the PS after PDI.
PS was immobilized in a solid support –
nanomagnet-porphyrin hybrids
PS concentrations 5.0 µM
Light intensity 40 mWcm-2
Exposure 270 minutes
A Gram negative bacteria (V. fischeri)
Controls (light, dark and material controls)
Approach
a) Water colloidal suspensions of the magnetic materials 6, 8-10 a) in the absence of a
magnetic bar; b) in the presence of a magnetic bar.
6 – PS cationic + neutral material 8 – PS cationic + cationic material 9 – neutral PS + cationic material 4 – neutral material 10 – cationic material
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
015
3060
90
Bio
lum
inesc
en
ce (
Lo
g R
LU
)
Time (min)
1º ciclo
2º ciclo
3º ciclo
4º ciclo
5º ciclo
6º ciclo
Free Tri-Py+-Me-PF (3 assays of 6 cycles)
Re-utilization of free and immobilized PS (nanomagnet-
porphyrin hybrid)
Phage therapy
Non-antibiotic approach that use:
Litic phages
Specific target (natural non-target bacteria not affected)
Self-replicating (one dose)
Legislative approval (phages are naturally occurring)
Easy penetration in infectious sites (necrosis tissue)
High resistance of phages to environmental conditions
Technology flexible, fast and cost effective
Advantages of phage therapy
Specificity of phage infection (disadvantage when pathogenic
bacteria is not known)
Difficulty overcomed when phage therapy is applied to specific cases, when the main pathogenic bacteria are known
Aquaculture (Vibrio, Photobacterium)
Poultry (Salmonella)
Skin/wound infections (e.g.Pseudomonas aeruginosa)
Desvantages of phage therapy
Resistance development
Phages can outcompete the adaptation of the bacteria
Is easy to find new phages, phage co-evolve with their host, rapid isolation of new lytic phages from the environment for phage-resistant bacterial mutants
Use of phage cocktails
Phage characterization
Host range, burst size, explosion time and survival
Bacteria isolated from aquaculture water
Phages produced on pathogenic bacteria
Phage host range (cross infection)
Burst size and explosion time (one step growth curves)
Survival in seawater
Approach
Vibrio parahaemolyticus phages
Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Phage host range - efficacy of plating (%) FISH PATHOGENIC
BACTERIA
PHAGES
VP-1 VP-2 VP-3
V. parahemolyticus V. anguillarum
100 83.3
100 93.4
100 51.2
A. salmonicida 64.8 92.0 73.8
A. hydrophilla V.fisheri
0 0
0 0
0 0
P. damselae subsp. damselae
0 0 0
E. coli P. aeruginosa P. fluorescens
P. putida P. segetis P. gingeri
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Vibrio phages
1
2
3
4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (minutes)
Log
(PFU
mL-1
)
VP-1 VP-2 VP-3
One step growth curve
Phage survival in seawater
Explosion time /burst size:
VP-1: 120 min/9; VP-2: 90 min/15; VP-3: 40 min 42
Phage survival:
VP-1 more than 7 month; VP-2 more
than 9 months; VP-3 more than 9 months
Results
0
2
4
6
8
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280
Log
(PFU
mL-1
)
Time (days)
VP-1
VP-2
VP-3
Phage therapy
Selection of multiplicity of infection (MOI)
MOI tested: 1, 10, 100 and 1000
Phage used: VP-2 phage: 105-9 CFP mL-1
Bacterial host concentration: 105 CFU mL-1
Phage therapy at 25°C during 36 hours
Samples collection: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24 and 36 hour
Phage quantification: double agar layer method
Bacteria quantification: pour plating technique
Three independent assays
Approach
Results
Phage therapy at different MOI Inactivation of V. parahaemolyticus by the VP-2 phage.
BC – Bacteria control, BP – Bacteria plus phage.
Values represent the mean of three independent experiments; error bars indicate the standard deviation.
Maximum inactivation: MOI 1: 3 log, MOI 10: 3.4 log, MOI 100: 4.1 log, MOI 1000: 4.7 log
2
4
6
8
10
0 10 20 30 40
Time (h)
Log
(CFU
mL-1
) BC 1000
BP 1000
BC 100
BP 100
BC 10
BP 10
BC 1
BP 1
MOI 1 MOI 10, 100, 1000
MOI 10 MOI 100, 1000
MOI 100 = 1000
Results
Phage therapy with phage cocktails
Inactivation of V. parahaemolyticus .
BC – Bacteria control, BP – Bacteria plus phage.
Values represent the mean of three independent experiments; error bars indicate the standard deviation.
A
Relationship between the bioluminescence signal (RLU) and
viable counts (CFU mL-1) of an overnight culture of a
transformed bioluminescent E. coli
Influence of environmental variables in the efficiency of phage therapy
Phage of a recombinant bioluminescent Escherichia coli strain as model
pH
Temperature
Salinity
Organic matter R² = 0,9838
R² = 0,9925
0
2
4
6
8
10
-5 0 5 10L
og
CF
U m
L-1
Log RLU
Approach
Influence of pH
A
0
2
4
6
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (h)
Log
RLU
BC 6.5
BP 6.5
BC 7.0
BP 7.0
BC 7.4
BP 7.4
Results
Increase of 14% in phage efficiency.
BC – Bacterial control; BP – Bacteria and phages
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (h)
Log
CFU
mL-1
BC 15ºC
BP 15ºC
BC 20ºC
BP 20ºC
0
2
4
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (h)
Log
RLU
BC 25ºC
BP 25ºC
Influence of temperature
Increase of 8% in phage efficiency.
Influence of salinity
Inactivation of bioluminescent E. coli by the phage at different salinity values. (A), bacterial bioluminescence at salinity 0 g L-1 and (B) bacterial concentration at salinities 10, 20 and 30 g L-1 along the 72 hours experiment. BC – Bacteria control, BP – Bacteria plus phage.
A
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (h)
Lo
g (
CFU
mL-1
)
BC 10g/L
BP 10g/L
BC 20g/L
BP 20g/L
BP 30g/L
BP 30g/L
A B
Results
Increase of 24% in phage efficiency.
0
2
4
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (h)
Log
RLU
BC 0g/L
BP 0g/L
0
2
4
6
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (h)Lo
g R
LU
BC 1:1
BP 1:1
BC 1x
BP 1x
BC 2x
BP 2x
Influence of organic matter content
Increase of 18% in phage efficiency.
BC – Bacterial control; BP – Bacteria and phages
Inactivation of bioluminescent E. coli by the phage at different MOI values. Bacterial bioluminescence variation along the 72 hours experiment. BC – Bacteria control, BP – Bacteria plus phage.
A
Phage therapy in Zebra Fish larvae.
Fish larvae selected 5 days post fecundation
Three samples for each condition, 20 larvae per sample
Fish larva stored at 27ºC with slight shake up to 72 hours.
Phages added orally 1 hour post bacteria challenge (V. anguillarum, 106 PFU mL-1)
Four conditions:
• Fish+Vibrio
• Fish+Vibrio + phage
• Fish + phage
• Fish (control)
Approach
Mortality similar in phage-treated and in non-infected samples, and much lower than in infected non-phage treated samples.
A
Condition %
Average S.D.
Vibrio + phage 2 2,7
Vibrio 16,7 2,9
Phage 0 0
Control (no Vibrio and no phage)
2,5 3,5
Fish mortality after 72 hours at 27ºC
Results
PDT Conclusions
Cationic porphyrins with 4 or 3 charges efficiently photoinactivated microorganisms
PDT is effective at micromolar concentration under different light condition
The bacteria that survived to PDT treatments in the presence of 5 M of porphyrin did not develop resistance after 10 cycles of aPDT.
The tricationic porphyrin inactivated effectively bacteria without the possibility of viability recovery after one week of dark incubation
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
The variations in pH (6.5-8.5), temperature (10-25ºC), salinity (20-40 g L-1) and O2 did not significantly affect the PDI of V. fischeri (in all conditions ≈7 log reduction).
The assays using aquaculture water showed that the efficiency of PDI is affected by the suspended matter.
Total PI of V. fischeri in aquaculture water was achieved under solar light in the presence of 20 µM of PS.
The new multicharged nanomagnet-porphyrin hybrids are very stable in water and highly effective in the photoinactivation of bacteria.
The hybrid was effective to photoinactivate bacteria for at least 6 cycles, inactivating > 40 log of bacteria.
PDT Conclusions
0
2
4
6
8
Lo
g (
PF
U.m
L-1)
0 54 108 144 216
Light dose (J.cm -2)
150 W.m-2
300 W.m-2
600 W.m-2
1200 W.m-2
N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF N HN
NNH
N
N
N
F F
F
FF
Chemical Formula: C41H22F5N7
Molecular Weight: 707,65
CH3
H3C
CH3
I
I
I
Chemical Formula: C44H31F5I3N7-
Molecular Weight: 1133,47
Tri-Py-PF Tri-Py+-Me-PF
Vibrio phages showed high survival time in marine water and specificity for
host pathogenic bacteria.
Phages with high burst sizes and short lytic cycles increase the efficiency of
phage therapy (more 2 log of inactivation).
The efficiency of phage therapy increased with the MOI, but the increase in
MOI from 100 to 1000 did not promote a significant increase in the efficiency
of phage therapy.
The utilization of phage cocktails increases the efficiency of phage therapy
against Vibrio (bacterial inactivation with phage cocktails occurred sonner and
with higher efficiencies than when phages were used alone)
Phage Therapy Conclusions
The efficiency of phage therapy was affected by the variation of the
environmental parameters, namely by salinity and organic matter content of
the waters.
As the effectiveness of phage therapy increases with water salt content, this
approach appears to be a suitable choice for marine aquaculture systems.
The phage treatment of challenged larvae with Vibrio anguillarum reduced the disease symptoms in the fish.
The disease symptoms after 3 days of incubation were similar to those that occur normally and were significantly lower in phage-treated larvae than in non-treated ones
Phage Therapy Conclusions
Ongoing Research project As Principal Investigator (Coordinator) • Project: PTDC/AAC-AMB/112934/2009: Terapia fágica como
alternativa de baixo impacto ambiental para inactivar bactérias patogénicas em pisciculturas. (Phage therapy as a low environmental impact alternative to inactive phatogenic bacteria in fishfarming plants) (2011-2014). Funds: 150 000 €.
• Project: PROMAR nº 31-03-05-FEP-0028. Terapia Fágica - Uma Nova Tecnologia para Depuração de Bivalves (Depurofago). (Phage therapy - a new technology to depurate shellfish - Depurofago). Fundo Europeu das Pescas (FEP). Programa Operacional de Pescas 2007-2013: Projectos-piloto, Portugal (2012-2015). Funds: 273 135 €.
• Project: PTDC/MAR-EST/2314/2012. Impacto da radiação solar nos processos fotoquímicos da matéria orgânica dissolvida e microbianos no ambiente estuarino. (Impact of solar radiation on dissolved organic matter photochemical and microbial processes in the estuarine environment) (2013-2015). Funds: 160 512 €.
Ongoing Research project
As Investigator • Project: AQUASAFE - Development of new technologies to anticipate and
diagnose disease outbreaks in aquaculture (2011-2014). Funds: 310 156 €.
• Project: RASTREMAR - Use of molecular tools in the traceability of marine
food products (2011- 2014). Funds: 346 799 €.
• Project: Project QREN, nº 13846 Desenvolvimento de Novas Tecnologias
de Suporte à Criação de Produtos Inovadores (NOVELTEC) (2011-2014).
• Project: Project QREN, Carne fresca com prazo de validade alargado e
maior segurança microbiológica recorrendo à tecnologia de Altas Pressões
(AP) – FRESHMEAT-AP (2014-2015).
• Project: Long term monitoring in the Ria de Aveiro: towards a deeper
understanding of ecological, environmental and economic processes. 2011-
2014). Funds: 199 999 €.
Acknowledgement
Universidade de Aveiro
CESAM, QOPNA
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Proj.POCTI/CTM/58183/2004
POCI 2010 (FEDER) (projecto POCI/CTM/58183/2004)
Prof. José Cavaleiro Prof. Graça Neves Prof. Amparo Faustino Prof. Augusto Tomé Dr. João Tomé Dra Carla Carvalho MSc Clara Gomes
Department of Chemistry
Prof. Adelaide Almeida Prof. Ângela Cunha Dr. Newton Gomes PhD Eliana Alves PhD Liliana Costa PhD Yolanda Silva PhD Carla Pereira MSc Anabela Oliveira MSc Anabela Tavares MSc Joana Almeida MSc Joana Brás MSc Cátia Arrojado
Department of Biology
Corte das Freiras Aquaculture staff
Thanks for your kind attention