8/4/2019 23 Union Leaders Expected to Collect Combined $56 Million in Their Lifetimes

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23-union-leaders-expected-to-collect-combined-56-million-in-their-lifetimes 1/6

 

Illinois college student isworld's shortest woman

First star bounced from'Dancing' is ...

Stantis' caption thiscartoon contest

In all, 23 expected to collect combined $56 m illion in their lifetimes

Home > News > Chicagoland

Comments 58 610Recommend

Dennis Gan non, then-president of the Chicago Federation of Labor, speaks with a bullhorn in April 2010 outside the

 Willis Tower as he joins around union members, small-business owners and community activists in a march with the

federation. Gannon’s current annual city pension is $1 58,258. (Antonio Perez, Chicago Tribune / September 21, 2011)

By J a s o n G r o t t o , Tribune reporter

September 21, 2011

CHICAGOLANDHome News Business Sports A&E Travel Health Opinion Real Estate Cars Jobs Shopping

Search

Law gives huge pension perks to union leaders

 All it took to give nearly two dozen labor leaders fromChicago a windfall worth millions was a few tweaks to

a handful of sentences in the state's lengthy pension

code.

The changes became law with no public debate among

state legislators and, more importantly, no cost

analysis.

Twenty years later, 23 retired union officials from

Chicago stand to collect about $56 million from two

ailing city pension funds thanks to the changes, a

Tribune/WGN-TV investigation found.

Because the law bases the city pensions on the labor

leaders' union salaries, they are reaping retirement

 benefits that far outstrip the modest salaries they made

as city employees. On average, their pensions are

nearly three times higher than what the typical retired

city worker receives.

MUGS IN THE NEWS

 VIDEO GALLERY 

$25 restaurant gift certificates for $8each 

Subscribe to daily deals

 

2011 Emmys: Best dressed, worstdressed 

Fashion After Dark: What you woreon the town 

FIND US ON FACEBOOK 39KLike

GRAPHIC: Chart: Big payouts from

pension rule

STORY: Politicians helped bring

Chicago's public pension funds to the

brink of insolvency

Related

8/4/2019 23 Union Leaders Expected to Collect Combined $56 Million in Their Lifetimes

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23-union-leaders-expected-to-collect-combined-56-million-in-their-lifetimes 2/6

No one from either the state Legislature or city 

government will take credit for the law, which passed

in 1991, and the process of drafting pension legislation

in Springfield is so shrouded in secrecy that there's no

 way of knowing exactly whom to hold responsible.

The Tribune and WGN-TV found that Senate

President John Cullerton was one of only 10

lawmakers on the committee that inserted the changes

into a much larger bill. He's also the only one who is

still in office.

Cullerton, who declined to be interviewed for this

story, denied being involved in the changes and issued

a statement that acknowledged the law now looks like

a bad idea.

"Municipal pensions should be for the hard-working

municipal employees, who typically toil in obscurity,

loyally contribute to the pension funds and aren't

about to get rich off of their retirements," he said in a

prepared statement. "Outliers such as those

highlighted by the WGN and Tribune reports should

 be corrected in order to help restore the system's fiscal

and public integrity."

Making changes won't be easy, however. That's

 because the state constitution says pension benefits

cannot be diminished once they are earned.

Pension experts from around the country say they've

never heard of such a perk for union leaders. They 

 warn that it not only creates opportunities to scam the

system but also robs the city of its ability to control

pension costs. The city doesn't set union salaries, the

most important ingredient in determining the size of 

the leaders' pensions.

What's more, none of the labor officials retired in the traditional sense. Even as they 

collected their inflated city pensions, they held on to their high-paying union jobs. A decade

ago, those public pension funds were flush, but they're now in such deep financial trouble

that they threaten to burden taxpayers and dues-paying union workers alike.

"At a time when the public is going to be asked to pay higher taxes for fewer services, the

revelation that there are benefits being paid for work that doesn't directly relate to official

city business is outrageous," said Laurence Msall, president of the Civic Federation, a

nonpartisan policy research group.

"It also undermines the hardworking government employees when state statutes aremanipulated to benefit a handful of people," he said.

Since the 1950s, city workers who take leaves of absence to work full time for unions have

been able to remain in city pension funds if they choose. The time they spend at their union

jobs counts toward their city pensions.

But few labor leaders took the deal until the law was changed in 1991 to base those workers'

city pensions on their union salaries instead of their old city paychecks, dramatically 

boosting the amount they could receive.

And every year, those city pensions grow by 3 percent. Records show the top earners are:

•Liberato "Al" Naimoli, president of the Cement Workers Union Local 76. He retired last

year from a $15,000-a-year city job that he last held a quarter-century ago. Today,

Naimoli receives more than $13,000 a month from the city laborers' pension fund even as

he continues to earn nearly $300,000 annually as president of Local 76. His city laborers'

pension will pay him about $4 million during his lifetime, according to a Tribune/WGN-TV 

analysis based on the funds' actuarial assumptions.

•James McNall vice resident of the International Union of O eratin En ineers Local

Facebook social plugin

STORY: Union leader draws lucrative

pension perk based on false

information

Watchdog reports: More on Chicago's

pensions crisis

Retirement

Wages and Pensions

Pension and Welfare

Topics

See more topics » 

8/4/2019 23 Union Leaders Expected to Collect Combined $56 Million in Their Lifetimes

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23-union-leaders-expected-to-collect-combined-56-million-in-their-lifetimes 3/6

150. He receives nearly $115,000 a year even though at the time he retired, in 2008, he had

not worked for the city in more than 13 years. He was only 51 when he started collecting a

city pension. By the time he turns 78, he will have received roughly $4 million from the city 

laborers' fund.

•Dennis Gannon, former president of the Chicago Federation of Labor. In 2004, he began

receiving more than $150,000 a year after retiring at age 50 from a $56,000-a-year city 

job that he had left nearly 13 years earlier. He received his city pension while collecting a

salary of about $200,000 from the federation. During his lifetime, the city municipal

pension fund will pay him approximately $5 million. Gannon told the Tribune that he was

only following the law in filing for a city pension.

Earlier this month, the Tribune and WGN-TV reported that Thomas Villanova, a top

labor leader, was receiving a city pension of $108,000 a year even as he earned credits in a

second pension through his union for the same time period, in violation of state law. He

had given up the credits and faced no penalty.

And last year, a Tribune investigation showed how city and union officials have

exploited Chicago's financially damaged pension funds for political reasons and personal

gain through a series of legislative maneuvers. The pension gift from government officials

to union leaders is a previously hidden example of this pattern.

Blame game  

The process of changing pension laws often lacks transparency, and there is virtually no

accountability. When problems arise, city pension fund officials blame the Legislature.

Legislators blame city officials and labor leaders while they, in turn, blame city pension

fund officials.

Not one current or former legislator contacted by the Tribune and WGN-TV will take

responsibility for the 1991 perk for labor leaders, and state records don't reveal exactly who

made it happen.

Here's what is clear: In April 1990, then-Sen. Emil Jones presented a bill aimed at

increasing pension benefits for city employees in the municipal pension fund. Other

members of the Senate and the House also added provisions before the bill passed both

chambers by the summer.

The bill didn't include the perk for labor leaders at that point, records show. But because the

versions passed by the two chambers differed slightly, each chamber appointed five

members to a conference committee to iron out the differences.

Although the 10 lawmakers were supposed to reach a compromise on what had passed

already, during their meetings more than 100 provisions were added to the bill. The new,

much larger bill included the pension deal for labor leaders.

"These provisions incorporated within this bill have been agreed to by the (city)

administration and the pension system and the laborers," Jones told his Senate colleagues

the day the bill passed in January 1991. "The people in the city of Chicago came togetherand agreed."

Jones, currently chairman of the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority, declined to be

interviewed for this story.

At the time of the change, Cullerton was the House Democratic floor leader, which meant

he served as field general for Speaker Michael Madigan, ensuring bills moved efficiently and

jibed with the speaker's priorities.

Through a spokesman, Cullerton said he doesn't recall the bill and played no role in drafting

the pension giveaway to union leaders. He also said the Legislature's process for passing

pension laws is more transparent today than it was in 1991 and that he has directed staff toresearch the legislation identified by the Tribune and WGN-TV.

"In retrospect, one can see how, year after year, pension funds were used as credit cards by 

governors and lawmakers to prop up state spending rather than face tough action on either

raising revenues, cutting services or both," he wrote.

Changes to Illinois law often begin with something known as a shell bill, which usually 

alters one word or date in a s ecific article and section of the code. Shell bills are a t e of 

8/4/2019 23 Union Leaders Expected to Collect Combined $56 Million in Their Lifetimes

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23-union-leaders-expected-to-collect-combined-56-million-in-their-lifetimes 4/6

placeholder that allows lawmakers to make more substantive changes later in the session,

often without scrutiny.

Many of the pension provisions inserted in 1991 had corresponding shell bills that previously 

altered one word or date of the same article, section and paragraph. Among them was a bill

that made a minor change to the exact section and paragraph where the union perk would

be codified.

That bill was filed by two men who were state senators at the time: Jeremiah Joyce, a close

political ally of former Mayor Richard M. Daley 's, and John Daley, a brother of the

former mayor's and now a Cook County commissioner.

Joyce did not respond to interview requests, and John Daley said he doesn't remember the

bill. "I don't recall it at all," Daley said.

Two days after the pension changes passed the Legislature, the city's unions lined up to

endorse Mayor Daley in his first re-election campaign. He would go on to serve as mayor

for the next 20 years with firm support from organized labor.

Contributions not on pace 

To report this story, the Tribune and WGN-TV requested records on every union leader who

has applied for the pension perk through the city's municipal pension fund and its laborers'

pension fund. The inquiry focused on labor leaders who worked for city government and

have retired.

Each year, the 23 labor leaders receive about $1.8 million from the funds. That works out to

an average of about $80,000.

Another 13 union officials are accruing benefits in the city funds but have yet to retire, and

six more received the deal after taking a union leave from the Chicago Public Schools.

Using assumptions made by the funds' actuaries, the Tribune and WGN-TV calculated the

total lifetime benefit of each retiree and total amount their contributions would be worth,

assuming an 8 percent return on investment each year.

Of the approximately $56 million the retired labor leaders stand to collect during theirlifetimes, roughly half won't be covered by their pension contributions, the analysis found.

With billions of dollars in unfunded pension liabilities, that's a drop in the bucket. But it

provides a window into why the funds have deteriorated: Contributions have not kept pace

with increasing benefits.

McNally, for example, stands to receive approximately $4 million from his city pension. He

received credit for 34 years of city service even though he spent more than a third of that

time working for Operating Engineers Local 150. And he was able to retire from the city at

51 through an early retirement incentive aimed at trimming the city's workforce.

In order to receive pension credit for his union work, McNally, who earns about $200,000a year from his job with the union, had to make contributions as if he'd been working for

the city all along.

What's more, he or his union would have to cover the city's portion of his pension

contributions in addition to the employee share. In all, McNally contributed less than

$200,000 to cover the credit he earned as a labor official, records show.

McNally declined to be interviewed for this story but provided a written statement.

"I had the option to continue making contributions to my (city) pension, which required

me to personally pay both my share and the city's share," he wrote. "Making these

payments required a very significant financial commitment from me and my family."

However, for six of the 13 years of union service applied to his city pension, McNally didn't

have to make contributions for the city's share. Chicago got a pass on making contributions

toward the laborers' pension fund between 2000 and 2006, and the same arrangement

applied to McNally.

That's one reason the pension fund is in such bad financial shape — and why city taxpayers

and current cit workers will end u coverin a lar e chunk of McNall 's ension.

8/4/2019 23 Union Leaders Expected to Collect Combined $56 Million in Their Lifetimes

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23-union-leaders-expected-to-collect-combined-56-million-in-their-lifetimes 5/6

 

Comments 58 610Recommend

« Previous Story MORE CHICAGO-AREA LOCA L NEW S:

THE LATEST LOCAL NEWS FROM THECHICAGO TRIBUNE

Next Story »

Facade collapsecrushingglassworksbusiness in OakPark 

Defense:Lincolnwood maninsane when hegunned downbrother 

None of these pension deals could happen without the blessing of city government, which

has granted lengthy leaves of absence to union officials. The average leave of absence for

city employees who are on a leave to work for a union is nearly eight years. Roughly a third

have been on leave for more than 12 years.

No city worker has received a longer leave of absence than Naimoli, who retired last year at

age 58 from a $15,000-a-year city job as a cement mixer even though he hadn't held that

job in more than 25 years.

Normally, city leaves of absence expire after a set period of time, and employees are

required to renew the leaves or lose their jobs. Yet when the commissioner of the city's

Department of Streets and Sanitation approved Naimoli's request for a leave in 1986, no

expiration date was filled in.

That indefinite leave allowed Naimoli to receive a city pension that is paying him about

$157,000 a year even as he collects a $292,000 salary from Local 76.

"Any leave of absence that is granted for more than a year raises questions about whether

that position is even necessary for ongoing operations of city government," Msall said.

"Current city workers are being asked to take furlough days and receive reductions in

compensation. To be granting these extended leaves of absences is a very cruel irony."

Naimoli, who did not return phone messages requesting an interview, is now the highest-

paid annuitant in the city laborers' pension fund. The average retired city worker receives

about $29,000 a year.

Producer Marsha Bartel and reporter Mark Suppelsa of WGN-TV contributed. 

 j g r o t t o @ t r i b u n e .c o m  

Copyright © 2011, Chicago Tribune

Comments (58) Add / View comments | Discussion FAQ

angryinburbs at 10:11 AM September 21, 2011

Cullerton is a crook, thank you to all of you who continue to vote for him. Madigan and Cullerton runthis state, into the ground.

8/4/2019 23 Union Leaders Expected to Collect Combined $56 Million in Their Lifetimes

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/23-union-leaders-expected-to-collect-combined-56-million-in-their-lifetimes 6/6

 

To our readers: Registration is required before your comments can be posted. Constructive and 

respectful comments related to the topic of the story are welcome; abusive, crass or vulgar comments 

are not. Comments containing vulgar words will be filtered out. Please make sure your language is civil 

and your comment furthers the conversation. Personal attacks on others who comment are not 

appropriate. Hateful, racist or threatening comments are not allowed. This is not a spot for free 

advertising or spam. We encourage you to help us uphold these standards by reporting abuse where 

appropriate. Ignoring the standards will result in your comment being removed. Repeat offenders will 

be banned. If warranted, we will take down entire comment boards. 

Photos in the news  Mugs in the news  Who's getting promoted  Celebrity sightings  2011 Emmys: Best dressed,

worst dressed 

SERV ICES Subscribe Manage subscription Subscription payment Mobile E-edition Newsletters/alerts Text alerts ChicagoPOINTS Online marketing Social-media contests News in Education 

CONNECT Editorial contacts Company contacts Send news tips Comments/feedback Tribune events Twitter Facebook RSS 

HELP  Advertising solutions Self-service advertising Special ad sections Site FAQs Accuracy Reprints About Tribune 

CLASSIFIED  Buy an ad Announcements Apartments Cars for sale Commercial real estateGarage sales Help wanted Homes for sale Mortgages Obituaries Pets for sale Public records 

SHOP  Coupons Fan Shop Wine Club Tribune Store Photo store 

 ARCHIVES Photos Video Events/listings Columns Readers Share Blogs Maps & apps Topic galleries 

A Tribune Newspaper website  

Terms of Service  Privacy  About Our Ads  Feedback  Chicago Tribune, 435 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, IL 60611  

gnubie at 10:10 AM September 21, 2011

Union members have their leadership to protect them from the evil and corrupt corporations. Who willprotect the taxpayers from the evil and corrupt unions and their government co-conspirators?Sweetheart retirement deals for government union members, stimulus funds exclusively for unionworkers, NLRB activism to prevent right-to-work for nonunion workers....... What's going to happen isthat we second-class taxpayers are going to revolt. We should we eat cat food in our retirement whilepaying for retirements that vastly exceed our lifetime incomes? Heed the warnings.

fletch_n_me at 10:08 AM September 21, 2011

But isn't it all for the teachers and toiling masses? Keep paying your dues and villainizing

republicans. It has worked out great for Detroit and Illinois is in the footsteps - named one of the mostinhospitable places to do business.Every time these red-faced goombas show up screaming into a bullhorn about how oppressed youare, please glance at the black Mercedes AMG parked behind them and realize that it costs more than

your house. Wisconsin's big ordeal wasn't about the rights of teachers or firemen, it was aboutkeeping unions alive in an era where they are increasingly obsolete. Losing a battle like that would

only demonstrate their increasing marginalization. You get poorer every decade and the same is not

true for your "labor leaders."