2014-02-17 Signatur A web-based tool to test Current and Future perspectives in Air Pollution...
-
Upload
alexandra-hoffman -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of 2014-02-17 Signatur A web-based tool to test Current and Future perspectives in Air Pollution...
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
A web-based tool to test Current and Future perspectives in Air Pollution
Forward-Looking Information in Environment AssessmentCopenhagen May 19-20, 2008
a model tool for the assessment of air pollution levels close to roads
presented byLars Gidhagen Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
Outline
1. The model tool – components and use
2. National study PM10 and NO2: Emissions and ambient air levels 2004 and 2020 (study realized Nov 2006 – May 2007)
3. National study PM2.5: Expected change in ambient air levels 2010 to 2020 (study realized Jan – Apr 2008)
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
EU directive has far reaching consequences for Swedish municipalities
PM10 90-percentile
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LONDON
LONDON
LONDON
HELSINKI
GLASGOW
CHARLEROI
LONDON
MÏNCHEN
MÏNCHEN
ZÜRICH
BREMEN
MÏNCHEN
MÏNCHEN
MÏNCHEN
PRAHA
LONDON
DARMSTADT
BERLIN
ZÜRICH
PRAHA
BERLIN
MADRID
MADRID
ROSLAGSVÄGEN
BERLIN
MADRID
E4 SOLLENTUNA
MADRID
BRATISLAVA
LISBOA
VALHALLAVÄGEN
PRAHA
PRAHA
PRAHA
PRAHA
MADRID
NORRLANDSG
PESCARA
ESSINGELEDEN
MADRID
SVEAVÄGEN
HORNSGATAN
UG/M3
AirBase:>700 sites19 countriesCAFE-PM, 2003
1. Model tool – components and use
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
1. Model tool – components and use
Not sufficient to simulate the impact of local traffic!
Regional(LRT)
Urban Local(roadside)
SO2
NO2
PM10
CO
O3 negative negative
benzene
Regional(LRT)
Urban Local(roadside)
SO2
NO2
PM10
CO
O3 negative negative
benzene
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
1. Model tool – components and use
Component 1: Road and traffic data - National Road Database (NVDB) - traffic counts and traffic simulation model EMME2 - emission factor model ARTEMISDelivered by the Swedish Road Administration
Concept: put together national information on roads, traffic, emissions and weather, add dispersion models - with annual updating of the databases
Component 2: Pre-calculated hourly background levels - EMEP expert emissions + SMHI MATCH model + some O3 & PM10 monitoring data => Regional background - Swedish 1x1 km emissions from SMED consortium + SIMAIR Urban model => Urban background contributionDelivered by SMHI
Component 3: Web-based user interface with online local models - open road dispersion model for countryside roads - street canyon model (OSPM) for streets with buildings nearby - reports and outputs with statistics for comparison with Env. NormsDelivered and operated by SMHI
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
Present use of the system
Development funded by Swedish EPA + Swedish Road Administration
Clients:- Approximately 100 municipalities- the 7 regional road administration districts- some consultant companies that works with EIAs- universities (as part of their training and capacity building)
Uses (external clientes): - assess compliance of Env. Norms (identify problematic street environments where measurements are needed)- determine consequences of future projects- assess emissions and AQ levels in residential areas with wood stoves (a third local model has been included in the SIMAIR system)
Uses (through SMHI):- national assessments of present and future emissions and AQ levels- national assessments of exposure for health assessments (using the third local model)
1. Model tool – components and use
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
Example from Norrköping
PM10 90-percentil> 50 µg/m3
40-50 µg/m3
35-40 µg/m3
30-35 µg/m3
<35 µg/m3
Norrköpings kommunMiljö- och hälsoskyddskontoretRobert Sandsveden
Satisfactorily similarity betweenmeasurements and model output.
Action plan PM10 (in Swedish)http://www.norrkoping.se/trafik/partikelhalter/
1. Model tool – components and use
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
PM10
Jämförelse mellan mätta och beräknade statistiska haltmått av PM10 (µg/m3) definierade i miljökvalitetsnormen. Jämförelsen görs för sex olika gator i fyra olika städer i Sverige nämligen Sundsvall, Uppsala, Stockholm och Malmö. Streckad linje visar miljökvalitetsnormens kvalitetskrav för modellberäkningar (baserat på årsmedelvärde) på +/- 50 %.
Evaluation against measurements
1. Model tool – components and use
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
Regional contributions (Europe)
SMHI MATCH calculation for EURODELTA 2020 could be used- EMEP expert emissions 2000 and 2020(original delta 2000-2020 corrected to 2004-2020)
Reference year 2004- EMEP expert emissions 2003 used (2004 not available)- meteorology for 2004 used also for 2020
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
Table Present limit values and environmental obectives for 2010
NO2 PM10
Average Limit valueobjective 2010
4020
4020
90-perc daily Limit valueobjective 2010
--
5035
98-perc daily Limit valueobjective 2010
60-
--
98-perc hourly Limit valueobjective 2010
9060
--
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
- Annual averages: decrease northwards- Daily 90-percentiles: Large variability everywhere
PM10 levels 2004 in rural areas
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
40
10
1
40
11
1
40
12
1
40
13
1
40
21
0
40
22
0
40
30
1
40
31
1
40
32
1
40
33
1
40
41
0
40
42
0
40
43
0
40
51
0
40
52
0
40
53
0
40
60
9
40
61
9
40
62
9
40
70
9
40
71
9
40
72
9
40
80
8
40
81
8
40
82
8
40
90
7
40
91
7
40
92
7
41
00
7
41
01
7
41
02
7
41
10
6
41
11
6
41
12
6
41
20
6
41
21
6
41
22
6
Vavihill Aspvreten VindelnRural measurements
Winter half-year PM10 2002-2003, Ambio (2005)
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
2004 2020
PM10 Regional contribution2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
2004 2020
NO2 Regional contribution2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
Urban and local contributions:
- Swedish traffic emissions
Northern
Sweden
Southern
Sweden
Fuel costs:
0,972020
0,842001
SEK/kmYear
0,972020
0,842001
SEK/kmYear
Estimated income change 2001 – 2020: 1,33Change public transport: 2001 – 2020: 1,36
Traffic work (million veh,km/year) • SIMAIR has 85-90% of traffic
work on individual road links, 10-15% (small roads) as area sources
• SMED report to CLRTAP based on top-down estimations
• ARTEMIS emission factors
• spatial distribution for vehicular traffic from SIMAIR
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
Emissions from Swedish Environmental
Emission Data (SMED)Emissioner PM10 (ton/år)
0
5 000
10 000
15 000
20 000
25 000
30 000
35 000
traf avgassjöfart
småsk.uppvärm.övrigt
Navigation Small scale heating Other
% av max
Traffic
Only exhaust particles,no wear particles included
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
PM10 emissions 2004(national total):
trafictraffi
c
navi
gatio
nsm
all s
cale
heat
ing
othe
r
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
The source profile for PM emissions varies
considerably from city to city
www.luftkvalitet.se Nationell presentation av emissioner och halter. SMHI-rapport 2007
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
traffic exhaustwood stovesnavigationenergy/industrytraffic wear
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
Swedish emissions:
- overall changes 2004 - 2020
traffic exhaust
wood stovesnavigationenergy/industry
PM10NOx tons/yeartons/year
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
2004 2020
PM10 Urban background (annual average)2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
2004 2020
NO2 annual average street level
• A considerably improvement expected
• However, SIMAIR has been shown to underestimate NO2 levels in the Norther part of Sweden (due to wintertime inversions)
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
2004 2020
PM10 annual average levels• (Scenario based on continued use of studded tyres)
• A small improvement expected, but levels still in the vicinity of the limit value
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
2004 2020
PM10 daily 90-percentiles
• (Scenario based on continued use of studded tyres)
• No significant improvement
2. PM10 and NO2 levels 2004 and 2020
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
3. PM2.5 levels in 2010 and 2020
PM2.5: Regional contributions (Europe)
SMHI MATCH calculation with IIASA emission scenarios(Amann et al., 2004) for 2020:- CLECLIM: ”Current legislation” with 20 €/ton CO2 after 2010
- D23LOW: CAFÉ scenario ”Low ambition” (cost 6 billion €/year) - MFRDEEP: ”Maximum feasible” with 90 €/ton CO2 after 2010
Reference year 2010:- CLECLIM without 20 €/ton CO2
Meteorology:- 1999 for all scenarios
Not included in MATCH simulations:- Sea salt, secondary organics, resuspended dust and contributions from forest fires
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
3. PM2.5 levels in 2010 and 2020
Reductions in regional PM2.5
Station CLECLIM D23LOW MFRDEEP Vavihill -1.0 -2.0 -3.7 Rörvik -0.8 -1.7 -3.3
Aspvreten -0.5 -0.9 -2.0 Vindeln -0.2 -0.3 -0.8
Calculated change in regional background levels 2010-2020 (µg/m3)
• Measured regional PM2.5 levels are in the range 8.5-13 µg/m3 => exposure reduction of 10% will be needed
• The 10% reduction in PM2.5 levels is likely to be fulfilled just due to expected LRT changes, except for in the northermost part of Sweden
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
3. PM2.5 levels in 2010 and 2020
Reductions in local PM2.5 emissions - response to four scenarios for studded tyres
Current percentagesof studded tyres
90
75
74
30
0 10 20 30 40 50
Malmö
Göteborg
Stockholm
Umeå
Emission factor (mg/veh,km)
2004
2020 conserved % studded tyres
2020 30% studded tyres2020 0% studded tyres
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
3. PM2.5 levels in 2010 and 2020
Reductions in local PM2.5 contributions - response to four scenarios for studded tyres
0
2
4
6
8
PM
2.5
[µ
g/m
3]
UmeåVästra Esplanaden
StockholmHornsgatan
GöteborgGårda
Malm öAm iralsgatan
Scenario 2: Å r 2020, inga förändringar vad gä ller dubbdäck
Scenario 1: Nuläge, m otsvarande år 2004
Scenario 3: Å r 2020, andelar dubbdäck i hela landet är 30%
Scenario 4: Å r 2020, inga dubbdäck
• Possible to reduce local PM2.5 contributions with more than half, by reducing the use of studded tyres to around 30%
23-0
4-10
Sig
natu
r
Thank you for your attention!