2013 Annual ASMBS Compensation Survey Teresa LaMasters MD, FACS John Magaña Morton, MD, MPH, FACS,...
-
Upload
lilian-flynn -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of 2013 Annual ASMBS Compensation Survey Teresa LaMasters MD, FACS John Magaña Morton, MD, MPH, FACS,...
2013 Annual ASMBS Compensation Survey
Teresa LaMasters MD, FACSJohn Magaña Morton, MD, MPH, FACS,
FASMBS
Background
• Nationally more physicians are becoming employed
• This is especially true in Bariatric surgery due to programmatic requirements and overhead
• There is a lack of valid benchmarking for physicians and hospitals to use when negotiating compensation
Background
• MGMA and AGMA models have been inadequate in the past and do not take into account specialized bariatric surgeons vs. general surgeons also involved in bariatric surgery
• Initial pilot survey sent to ASMBS members in 2012 – results on website
• Further development and refinement of the survey was required
Objective
• Determine compensation ranges and practice patterns for ASMBS members– Hospital employed– Private Practice
Who can Benefit?
• All surgeons negotiating contracts with employers
• New graduating fellows• ASMBS Leadership to better understand
membership needs• All surgeons evaluating joining a practice• Surgeons who desire to see a snapshot of
future career
Methods
• Surveys sent out electronically 3 times by ASMBS in 2013 regarding data from 2012.
• Survey was sent to ASMBS membership• Survey Monkey was utilized
Response Rate Hospital employed
N = 66 Total sample used = 65 Exclusions
Part-time surgeon (n=1) Data from 62 respondents used in the compensation summary
The 3 respondents not used either did not provide compensation information or provided it in a form that was not feasible (e.g. a response of 500)
22 states represented Private Practice
N=47 Total sample used = 46 Exclusions
Part-time surgeon (n=1) Data from 39 respondents used in the compensation summary
The 7 respondents not used either did not provide compensation information or provided it in a form that was not feasible (e.g. a response of 500)
24 states represented
Hospital Employed Questions• Which of the following best
describes your practice model?• How many years have you been
in practice? • How much experience do you
have performing bariatric surgery?
• What is your career volume for bariatric surgery?
• What is your employment status?
• What percent of your time is dedicated to bariatric surgery?
• In what state are you employed?• Did you complete a Fellowship?
If yes, what type?• Select the method that most
accurately reflects your current compensation model.
• What is the amount of your total compensation?
• What is your estimated annual retirement contribution?
• Which of the following benefits are provided to you and paid by your employer?
Hospital Employed Questions• Do you receive a bonus or
incentive? If yes indicate what the bonus is based upon.
• If your compensation is based on WRVU production, provide the amount paid per WRVU
• Provide the threshold amount at which the incentive begins and the compensation amount per WRVU that you receive
• How many work RVUs did you produce?
• How many days a month do you take bariatric, general surgery and trauma call?
• Are you paid for taking call? If yes, how much?
• At how many hospitals do you operate?
• How many bariatric practices are present at your primary hospital?
• Provide volume for each of the procedures listed on the attached table
Demographics – Hospital
• 49 of 65 had a fellowship and 37 completed a bariatric fellowship
76%
25%
Fellowship with Bariatrics
YesNo
Demographics – Private Practice
• 28 of 47 had a fellowship and 18 completed a bariatric fellowship
64%
36%
Fellowship with Bariatrics
YesNo
Hospital EmployedYears in Practice vs Bariatric n=66
In the previous survey (2012), there was a trend of a significant portion of surgeons starting in bariatrics later in their career around 5-10 years after they started their practice.
Years in Practice
Years Bariatric Surgery
0-5 years 5-10 years >10 years
0-5 years 19 0 0
5-10 years 2 14 0
10-20 years 1 4 15
>20 years 0 4 7
Private Practice Years in Practice vs Bariatric n=47
Years in Practice
Years Bariatric Surgery
0-5 years 5-10 years >10 years
0-5 years 8 0 0
5-10 years 2 8 0
10-20 years 0 2 15
>20 years 0 2 10
Hospital EmployedTime vs Surgeries n=64
Time Dedicated to
Bariatric Surgery
Number Surgeries Performed
<50 50-150 150-500 500-1000 >1000
<20% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6%
21-50% 1.6% 6.3% 12.5% 7.8% 4.7%
51-80% 0.0% 1.6% 9.4% 6.3% 15.6%
>80% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% 12.5% 14.1%
Private PracticeTime vs Surgeries n=44
Time Dedicated to
Bariatric Surgery
Number Surgeries Performed
<50 50-150 150-500 500-1000 >1000
<20% 1 (2.3%) 1 (2.3%) 0 1 (2.3%) 0
21-50% 0 3 (6.8%) 0 2 (4.5%) 4 (9.1%)
51-80% 0 1 (2.3%) 0 2 (4.5%) 8 (18.2%)
>80% 0 0 2 (4.5%) 1 (2.3%) 18 (40.9%)
Hospital Employed – Call
Days BariatricN=59
General Surgery
N=60Trauma
N=51
0 1 (2%) 14 (23%) 41 (80%)1-14 23 (39%) 45 (75%) 10 (20%)
15-30 35 (59%) 1 (2%) 0
Hospital employed bariatric surgeons are most likely to take bariatric and general surgery call and least likely to take trauma call.80% do not take any trauma call and 23% do not take any general surgery call.
Hospital Employed >80% Bariatrics– Call
Days BariatricN=18
General Surgery
N=17Trauma
N=17
0 0 9 (53%) 15 (88%)1-14 8 (44%) 8 (47%) 2 (12%)
15-30 10 (56%) 0 0
Hospital employed surgeons who dedicate 80% of their time to bariatrics, are more likely to take bariatric call than general surgery call. In addition, they are least likely to take trauma call.88% do not take any trauma call and 53% do not take any general surgery call.
All Private Practice – Call
Days BariatricN=40
General Surgery
N=39Trauma
N=36
0 2 (5%) 13 (33%) 30 (83%)1-14 18 (45%) 23 (59%) 5 (14%)
15-30 20 (50%) 3 (8%) 1 (3%)
Private practice bariatric surgeons are most likely to take bariatric and general surgery call and least likely to take trauma call.83% do not take any trauma call and 33% do not take any general surgery call.
Private Practice >80% Bariatrics– Call
Days BariatricN=20
General Surgery
N=18Trauma
N=17
0 2 (10%) 11 (61%) 15 (88%)1-14 6 (30%) 7 (39%) 2 (12%)
15-30 12 (60%) 0 0
Private practice surgeons who dedicate 80% of their time to bariatrics, are more likely to take bariatric call than general surgery call. In addition, they are least likely to take trauma call.88% do not take any trauma call and 61% do not take any general surgery call.
All Hospital Employed
36.9
32.3
30.8
Percent time dedicated to Bariatric Surgery
0-50%51-80%>80%
N=65
All Private Practice
27.7
23.4
46.8
Percent time dedicated to Bariatric Surgery
0-50%51-80%>80%
N=47
All Hospital Employed
15.4
4027.7
16.9
Regions represented overall
MidwestNortheastSouthWest
22 Different States represented
N=65
All Private Practice
17.4
21.741.3
17.4
Regions represented overall
MidwestNortheastSouthWest
24 Different States represented
N=46
All Hospital Employed
Midwest
Northeast
South
West
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-50% time in Bariatrics51-80%>80 time
14.1
39.126.6
20.3
Regions represented overall
MidwestNortheastSouthWest
N=64
All Private Practice
Midwest
Northeast
South
West
05
101520253035404550
0-50% time in Bariatrics51-80%>80 time
17.8
22.240
20
Regions represented overall
MidwestNortheastSouthWest
N=45
Hospital Employed2012
Compensationn=62
Total RVUn=33
Retirementn=51
RVU Incentive Threshold
n=19
Incentive Above RVU Threshold
n=12Overall N=66Mean $445,032 8,279 $36,666 7,413 $48.9Std. Dev. $188,564 3,458 $35,280 2,484 $8.4Minimum $200,000 3,230 $10,000 5,000 $39.0Maximum $1,100,000 20,000 $240,000 16,000 $70.0Percentiles 20th $301,000 5,440 $17,500 6,000 $42.3 50th $388,500 7,900 $28,000 6,500 $48.5 75th $497,750 9,000 $39,000 7,500 $52.2 90th $698,500 12,480 $60,000 10,000 $54.8
Hospital Employed > 80% 2012
Compensation n=20
Total RVUn=10
Retirement n=17
RVUIncentiveThreshold
n=7
Incentive Above RVU Threshold
n=4Overall N=20Mean $464,050 8,202 $41,176 6,809 $56.4Std. Dev. $219,404 3,773 $53,830 1,435 $9.0Minimum $283,000 3,230 $13,000 6,000 $51.0Maximum $1,100,000 14,995 $240,000 10,000 $70.0Percentiles 20th $325,000 5,321 $17,100 6,000 $51.6
50th $386,000 8,100 $25,000 6,500 $52.4 75th $450,000 8,800 $36,000 6,853 $57.1 90th $761,200 14,100 $62,000 8,000 $64.8
Private Practice 2012
Compensationn=39
Retirementn=35
Overall N=47Mean $658,116 $40,593Std. Dev. $907,700 $24,745Minimum $200,000 $5,000Maximum $5,850,000 $125,000
Percentiles 20th $290,000 $21,900
50th $400,000 $40,000 75th $640,000 $50,000 90th $931,000 $54,600
Survey respondents reported their total compensation. It is possible this compensation may include revenue from non clinical sources. It’s also possible that, different from hospital employed physicians, private practice physicians are responsible for the payment of benefits (e.g. health insurance, malpractice insurance. etc.) from this reported compensation. Hence the outlying maximum salary.
Private Practice > 80% Bariatrics 2012
Compensationn=18
Retirementn=17
Overall N=22Mean $856,196 $42,692Std. Dev. $1,290,743 $30,999Minimum $260,000 $5,000Maximum $5,850,000 $125,000Percentiles 20th $308,000 $16,000
50th $418,500 $40,000 75th $845,000 $49,500 90th $1,188,500 $81,600
Survey respondents reported their total compensation. It is possible this compensation may include revenue from non clinical sources. It’s also possible that, different from hospital employed physicians, private practice physicians are responsible for the payment of benefits (e.g. health insurance, malpractice insurance. etc.) from this reported compensation. Hence the outlying maximum salary.
Hospital Employed2011
Compensationn=50
Total RVUn=26
Retirementn=45
Overall N=66Mean $420,235 7,780 $32,933Std. Dev. $153,595 3,281 $19,934Minimum $210,000 3,000 $11,000Maximum $850,000 19,000 $100,000Percentiles 20th $300,000 5,000 $16,900
50th $400,000 7,350 $28,000 75th $471,250 9,300 $40,000 90th $650,000 10,000 $51,200
There was significant repetition of data from 2010 and 2011 suggesting possible error in reporting 2010 data. For this reason we did not analyze 2010. The 2011 data was similar to previously reported 2011 data in the past ASMBS survey.
Hospital Employed >80% Bariatrics 2011
Compensationn=17
Total RVUn=6
Retirement n=17
Overall N=20Mean $396,927 7,135 $28,088Std. Dev. $130,307 3,368 $14,895Minimum $275,000 3,512 $11,000Maximum $786,000 12,600 $60,000Percentiles 20th $302,000 4,000 $16,600
50th $350,000 6,850 $20,000 75th $425,000 8,550 $36,000 90th $544,450 10,800 $50,800
There was significant repetition of data from 2010 and 2011 suggesting possible error in reporting 2010 data. For this reason we did not analyze 2010. The 2011 data was similar to previously reported 2011 data in the past ASMBS survey.
All Private Practice 2011
Compensationn=37
Retirementn=33
Overall N=47Mean $617,751 $39,761Std. Dev. $657,527 $21,275Minimum $100,000 $10,000Maximum $4,000,000 $100,000Percentiles
20th $302,000 $24,400
50th $444,143 $38,000 75th $640,000 $49,000 90th $870,000 $54,600
There was significant repetition of data from 2010 and 2011 suggesting possible error in reporting 2010 data. For this reason we did not analyze 2010. The 2011 data was similar to previously reported 2011 data in the past ASMBS survey.
Private Practice >80% Bariatrics 2011
Compensationn=17
Retirementn=17
Overall N=22Mean $763,928 $39,005Std. Dev. $916,368 $26,351Minimum $260,000 $10,000Maximum $4,000,000 $100,000Percentiles
20th $304,000 $18,600
50th $444,143 $32,000 75th $660,000 $47,000 90th $1,350,000 $70,000
Approximately half of the respondents for annual salary and retirement gave the same value for the year of 2010 and 2011. Consequently it was assumed the values reflected 2011 and the previous year was potentially in error, for this reason we did not analyze 2010.
Incentive Bonus
Hospital Employed Private PracticeReceive Incentive Bonus 44 20
Mean Bonus $65,750 (n=22) $121,883 (n=6)
RVU Target
Hospital Employed Private PracticeRVU Target 30 5
Mean Target 6998 6500 (n=2)
Medical Directorship
Hospital Employed (N=66)
Private Practice(N=47)
Medical Directorship (n)
13 4
Mean Compensation
$54,167 $82,000
BenefitsHospital (N=66) Hospital % Private
(N=47) Private %
Malpractice Insurance 63 95.5% 29 61.7%
CME Allowance 59 89.4% 26 55.3%Med Insurance: Employee Only 15 22.7% 6 12.8%
Med Insurance: Employee Dependents
51 77.3% 24 51.1%
Disability Insurance 49 74.2% 16 34.0%
Life Insurance 48 72.7% 12 25.5%
Dental Insurance 54 81.8% 16 34.0%
Vision Insurance 49 74.2% 11 23.4%
Benefits
Malp
ractice
Insu
rance
CME Allo
wance
Med In
sur:E
mployee O
nly
Med In
sur: E
mployee Dep
Disabilit
y Insu
rance
Life In
suran
ce
Dental In
suran
ce
Vision In
suran
ce0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
Private PracticeHospital
Quality Metrics
Hospital Employed
N=33
Private Practice
N=7 Participate in QI Projects 5 1 Patient Satisfaction 11 3 Use EMR 9 1 Clinical Outcomes 5 2 Access 1 0 Peer Review 2 0
Compensation Model
Hospital EmployedN=66
Private PracticeN=46
Base Salary Plus Incentive 39 12
Production Model 6 27
Straight/Guaranteed Salary 21 3
Revenue minus Expenses or % of collections
NA 4
The most common model for employed surgeons was base salary plus incentive. The most common model for private practice respondents was a production model.
Compensation Model
Base Sa
l + In
cent
Producti
on Model
Straig
ht/Gau
ranteed Sa
l
Rev - Exp
or % of c
ollecti
ons05
10152025303540
Hospital EmployedPrivate Practice
VisitsHospital
EmployedPrivate Practice
Clinic Visits N=31 N=18
Average Per Year 1500 1600
Estimated Per Week 29 31
New Patient Visits N=32 N=18
Average Per Year 300 925
Estimated Per Week 8 18
Total visit numbers were similar for employed and private practice surgeons.Private practice had a higher number of new patient visits.
Hospital Employed– Procedures
Hospital Employed: Procedures N 0 1-25 26-50 51-75 76-100 >100 min median maxUpper GI Endoscopy 42 8 8 6 4 6 10 0 50 4,500Lower GI Endoscopy 38 26 4 6 1 0 1 0 0 120Laparoscopy: Gastric Bypass with Roux enY 66 19 9 13 7 8 10 0 36 228Laparoscopy: Place Adj. Gastric Band 66 30 32 1 1 1 1 0 1 350Laparoscopy: Sleeve 66 18 15 16 8 4 5 0 25 185Laparoscopy: VBG 66 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Laparoscopy: BPD/DS 66 60 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 60Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of Band 66 24 38 2 2 0 0 0 3 75Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of Gastric Bypass 66 41 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 25Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of Sleeve 66 46 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 10Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of VBG 66 50 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 7Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of BPD/DS 66 62 6 0 0 0 0 0 102 448
Private Practice – Procedures
Private Practice: Procedures N 0 1-25 26-50 51-75 76-100 >100 min median maxUpper GI Endoscopy 29 5 6 2 1 2 13 0 100 500Lower GI Endoscopy 24 13 5 2 0 2 2 0 10 150Laparoscopy: Gastric Bypass with Roux enY 47 15 7 7 5 5 8 0 40 214Laparoscopy: Place Adj. Gastric Band 47 20 18 5 0 2 2 0 2 75Laparoscopy: Sleeve 47 14 11 6 3 5 8 0 21 305Laparoscopy: VBG 47 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Laparoscopy: BPD/DS 47 44 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 20Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of Band 47 20 24 3 0 0 0 0 2 50Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of Gastric Bypass 47 28 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 36Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of Sleeve 47 39 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 15Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of VBG 47 36 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 27Laparoscopy: Revision/Conversion of BPD/DS 47 44 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Conclusion
• The response level is lower than optimal for this survey, however it is equivalent to the response rate for the MGMA survey. Useful and important data is present.
• ASMBS members are a diverse group– Case volume– Years of Experience– Percent of Time Dedicated to Bariatrics
• Practice Environment should be considered in compensation discussions
Contributing Members
• Chair - Samer Mattar MD, FACS• Co-Chair- Teresa LaMasters MD, FACS• Member Ashutosh Kaul MD, MS, FRCS, FACS
Member John D. Scott MDMember Eric S. Bour MDMember Stephen D. Wohlgemuth MD
• Member Marina Kurian MD• President ASMBS 2014-2015 John Magaña
Morton, MD, MPH, FACS, FASMBS
Support Provided
• Jennifer Wynn– Director of Committee Affairs – Assistant to Executive Director– ASMBS
• Georgeann Mallory, RD– Executive Director ASMBS
• Kristen Danielle Hahn– Research assistant UnityPoint Health, Des Moines IA
• Catherine Hackett Renner, PhD– Director Office of Research– UnityPoint Health, Des Moines, IA