2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

download 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

of 49

Transcript of 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    1/49

    Basic Principles

    Presented by Joven Calara Research Engineer, Metallurgy

    Scanning ElectronMicroscopy

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    2/49

    Simple Magnifiers

    Raindrop

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    3/49

    Simple Magnifiers

    Raindrop

    Simple lens

    - hand magnifier

    Magnification to ~10x

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    4/49

    Compound Magnifiers - Microscope

    Maximum magnification ~1000x - WHY?

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    5/49

    Light Microscope limits of magnification

    Green algae 400X magnification

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    6/49

    Light Microscope limits of magnification

    Green algae 800X magnification

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    7/49

    Visible Light Spectrum

    Wavelength () 400 700 nm

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    8/49

    Optical microscopes

    Optical microscopes resolution limited bywavelength of light

    Abbes Law;Maximum resolution = /2 = 200 nm

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    9/49

    Image of point light source the Airy disc

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    10/49

    Image of point light source the Airy disc

    Airy disk

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    11/49

    Image of point light source the Airy disc

    Airy disk

    Airy disks and resolution

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    12/49

    Objects smaller than 500 nm

    Viruses, as small as 5 nm

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    13/49

    Objects smaller than 500 nm

    Viruses, as small as 5 nm

    Smoke or soot particles

    Colloids (very fine particles) Milk !

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    14/49

    Objects smaller than 500 nm

    http://www.foodsci.uoguelph.ca

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    15/49

    Wavelengths shorter than 200nm needed

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    16/49

    Wavelengths shorter than 200nm needed

    , nm Why not

    Ultraviolet 100 200 Glass is opaque to UV

    X-rays 0.1 100 Glass cant focus x-rays

    Gamma rays < 0.1 Ionizes everything

    By early 1900, new approaches to microscopy were desperately

    needed.

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    17/49

    A Different Method of Magnification - Mapping

    Mapping ; one-to-one correspondence betweenfinite number ofthe elements of two areas. Modern implementation is scanning.

    Example; a small photograph mapped onto a building wall mural

    scanning photo into picture elements (pixels) and enlarged

    reproduction of the pixels. Each pixel a single color/brightness.

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    18/49

    20 cm x 20 cm

    section of LCD

    Subdivide this into pieces,

    each to match a pixel on LCD

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    19/49

    A section of an LCD screen

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    20/49

    A section of an LCD screen

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    21/49

    Pixel count = 4 per mm

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    22/49

    20 cm x 20 cm

    section of LCD

    Subdivide this into pieces,

    each to match a pixel on LCD

    screen

    800 pixels high and wide

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    23/49

    20 cm x 20 cm

    section of LCD

    Black and white picture, pixel attribute

    is brightness only. Laser beam scan OK.

    800 pixels high and wide

    = laser spot diameter

    d cm

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    24/49

    20 cm x 20 cm

    section of LCD

    Black and white picture, pixel attribute

    is brightness only. Laser beam scan OK.

    800 pixels high and wide

    = laser spot diameter

    d cm

    d, cm magnification laser spot dia.

    5 4x 0.063 mm

    0.2 100x 0.0025 mm

    0.02 1000x 250 nanometers

    0.01 2000x 150 nm

    Light beams at >>1000x

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    25/49

    Electron beams (electrical discharges)

    Lightning electron beamin air

    Lightning Globe toy

    electron beams in partial

    vacuum

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    26/49

    Early Electron Beam Device Crookes Tube

    Cathode ray tube

    Cathode ray deflection with

    magnetic fields

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    27/49

    Early oscilloscope (1897)

    First example of beam scanning, just on a

    single line. Input signal appears as waveform.

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    28/49

    Cathode ray tube (CRT, 1907)

    Raster scanning

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    29/49

    Modern Electron Beam Devices

    Television - Computer monitors

    CRT monitor ~1980

    TV

    Black and white TV - ~1950

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    30/49

    Technological skills in place by early 1900;

    Generation of electron beam

    Focusing of the beam

    Scanning or rastering (scanninge.g. left to right, then down a bit,

    repeat scan)

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    31/49

    Simplified sketch of electron scanning optics

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    32/49

    Simplified sketch of electron scanning optics

    Laser scanning

    detected signal = reflected light

    E-beam scanning

    detected signal = ? ? ? ?

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    33/49

    Electron beam solid interaction

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    34/49

    Secondary electrons,

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    35/49

    The Scanning Electron Microscope

    T

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    36/49

    Electron Imaging Effect of Surface Topology

    (Detector overhead sample)

    T

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    37/49

    Electron Imaging Effect of Surface Topology

    (Detector overhead sample)

    T

    Chrysanthemum pollens

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    38/49

    Small area on

    specimen

    Display device photo print or monitor

    Magnification by the SEM

    Effect of Probe (Beam Spot) Size

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    39/49

    Small area on

    specimen

    Display device photo print or monitor

    Magnification with wide probe size (laser spot?)

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    40/49

    Wavelength of electron beams theDe Broglie Equation

    Light can behave as waves (lightwaves), or as particles (photons).

    De Broiglie proposed the converse is also true. Electrons have wave

    properties.

    De Broglie Equation adaptedto SEM

    = h/sqrt(2meV)

    = 1.23/sqrt(V) nanometers

    At V = 10,000 volts, = 0.0123 nanometers

    De Broglie Equation adaptedto SEM

    = h/sqrt(2meV)

    = 1.23/sqrt(V) nanometers

    At V = 10,000 volts, = 0.0123 nanometers

    h (Plancks constant) = 6.63x10-34 Js

    m(electron mass) = 9.11x10-31 kg

    e (electron charge) = 1.6x10-19 C

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    41/49

    SEM resolution

    Theoretical 0.01 nm

    Development lab grade 0.1 nm

    High end 1.0 nm Typical 3 nm (ca. 300,000x)

    Typical magnifications routine 200-8000x

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    42/49

    Depth of Field how deep is the field in sharp focus

    Optical microscope SEM

    Tungsten filament

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    43/49

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    44/49

    Characteristic X-rays;

    Elements Chemical Analysis

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    45/49

    Characteristic X-rays;

    Elements Chemical Analysis

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    46/49

    Ductile Iron

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    47/49

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    48/49

    JEOL JSF-6400 Scanning Electron Microscope of SLCC

  • 8/3/2019 2012 Spring SEM Lecture 01

    49/49

    Hitachi TM3000 Scanning Electron Microscope