2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

54
2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference Alternatives to Advanced Preemption at Railroad Crossings

description

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference. Alternatives to Advanced Preemption at Railroad Crossings. 2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference. What is Railroad Preemption at a Grade Crossing?. 2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Page 1: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Alternatives to Advanced Preemption at Railroad Crossings

Page 2: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

What is Railroad Preemption at a Grade Crossing?

Page 3: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Railroad Preemption:A special control mode in a traffic signal controller designed to start up and clear any vehicular traffic on the roadway approach crossing the railroad tracksThen allows only traffic movements that do not conflict with the railroad for the duration of the train movement

Page 4: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

8 3

7 4

25

16

1. Terminate any allowable combination of phases and associated pedestrian movements.

Page 5: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

8 3

7 4

25

16

2. Display Green for Track Clearance Movements and hold in Green until railroad gates are down.

Page 6: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

8 3

7 4

25

16

3. Allow only those phases or movements that do not conflict with crossing until preemption ends.

Page 7: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

8 3

7 4

25

16

3. Allow only those phases or movements that do not conflict with crossing until preemption ends.

Page 8: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

8 3

7 4

25

16

3. Allow only those phases or movements that do not conflict with crossing until preemption ends.

Page 9: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

What is Advanced Preemption?

Page 10: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Advanced Preemption is an operating mode which allows the traffic signal to display

green to clear the track before the railroad flashing lights

begin to operate

Page 11: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

8 3

7 4

25

16

1. Track clearance green interval begins

Page 12: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

8 3

7 4

25

16

2. Railroad warning devices begin to operate

Page 13: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

8 3

7 4

25

16

3. End track clearance green

Page 14: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

That seems simple enough, what’s the issue here?

Page 15: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

When preemption is implemented, adequate time must be provided in order to permit a Design Vehicle to

clear the crossing prior to the arrival of the train75’ in MN

Page 16: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

So how much time does it

take for preemption to

operate?

In this example, 52 seconds is

required.

101’

Page 17: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Minimum Green = 7 secondsPedestrian Change = 29 seconds

Yellow Change = 4 secondsRed Clearance = 2 seconds

32 seconds of Advanced Preemption Time required at this location

Page 18: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

The required amount of time

must be provided by the

railroad train detection circuitry

Page 19: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

MUTCD requires that the

railroad must provide a

minimum 20 seconds of

warning prior to the arrival of a through train

Page 20: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Any time required

beyond the minimum

warning time prior to the

arrival of a train becomes an addition to a basic warning system project

Page 21: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

In a nutshell..

Time=

$$$

Page 22: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Why?1.Substantial additional circuitry due to electrical design limitations of the train detection equipment2.Railroad train control signal system must co-exist with crossing systems3.Remote equipment locations which may be 1000’s of feet from the crossing4.Extensive underground cabling to remote locations

Page 23: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

What are the alternatives to advanced preemption or

lengthy advanced preemption times?

Page 24: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Turn off the traffic

signal

Effective?

Practical?

Page 25: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Grade Separate

the Crossing

Even more $$$

Page 26: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Close the Crossing

Never a popular

choice with local

politicians

Page 27: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Practical Engineering Solutions

Page 28: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Pedestrian TreatmentsCrosswalk Elimination

Page 29: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

From our example, the Pedestrian Change Time is 29

seconds

Engineering changes to the intersection can reduce the

time required from the railroad

Page 30: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

In many cases, there is no sidewalk present

between the track and the

parallel roadway

Page 31: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Eliminate the crosswalk

parallel and closest to the

track

Can save 2 – 4 seconds of pedestrian

change time

Page 32: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Pedestrian TreatmentsRefuge Islands

Page 33: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Installing pedestrian refuge islands to shorten the distance and

required pedestrian clearance time

Page 34: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

This permits the required pedestrian

clearance time to be reduced by

approximately 50% depending on

crosswalk lengths

Page 35: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

New TechnologyQueue Cutter Signal

Page 36: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

A Queue Cutter Signal is the most cost effective tool

available to reduce advance preemption time

Page 37: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

A Queue Cutter Signal is a separate traffic control signal installed at a grade crossing

Page 38: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

A queue cutter signal is not connected to or operated as a part of a

downstream signalized intersection

Page 39: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Generally, a queue cutter signal is installed where the Clear Storage

Distance exceeds 400 - 450’

Page 40: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Queue Loops

Queue loops must use fail-safe design and vital loop processor system

Each loop wire has 2 independent loop circuits – a detect loop and a check loop

Queue cutter signal flashes red if there is a loop system failure

Varies200 – 250’

Typical Queue Cutter Signal Layout

Page 41: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Queue Cutter Signal

inLos

Angeles

Page 42: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Queue Cutter Signal

inLos

Angeles

Page 43: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Page 44: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

It is interconnected with the railroad warning system with a small amount

of advance preemption time

This allows time for the queue cutter to change to red before the railroad

flashing lights activate

Page 45: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Page 46: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Page 47: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Page 48: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

When is a Queue Cutter not a Queue Cutter?

When it’s a Pre-Signal

Page 49: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Installed like a Queue Cutter

Looks like a Queue Cutter

Too close to the downstream intersection to use queue

detection

Page 50: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

A Pre-Signal still requires full Advanced Preemption Time

from the railroad

Why?

Page 51: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Confusing to road users – is it a pre-signal or near-side

signal faces?

Do I wait here or can I make a right-turn-on-red?

Page 52: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Pre-Signal ornear side

signal faces?

Page 53: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

CLOSING THOUGHTS

Remember – Preemption operation is not as easy as it appears on the surfaceRecognize – You need professional help to understand and properly design the systemUnderstand - Connecting 2 independent systems produces a third, more complex systemGrasp - The railroad is your friend – REALLY!Plan - It will take longer and cost more than you think.

Page 54: 2012  Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

2012 Minnesota DOT – ACEC Annual Consultant Conference

Questions?

Rick CampbellCTC, Inc.

[email protected]