Oakville mortgage | Mortgage in Oakville - Investment Home Opportunity
2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report Development... · Intensification Areas in...
Transcript of 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report Development... · Intensification Areas in...
Prepared by: AECOM 105 Commerce Valley Drive West, Floor 7 905 886 7022 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3T 7W3 9 905 886 9494 fax www.aecom.com Project Number:
60198085 Date:
August 25, 2011
Water
Region of Halton
2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 i
Distribution List
# of Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name
50 1 Halton Region
Revision Log Revision # Revised By Date Issue / Revision Description
1 CH January 31, 2011 First Draft
2 DM April 15, 2011 Second Draft
3 CH July 8, 2011 Third Draft
4 CH July 22, 2011 Fourth Draft
5 MZ/CH July 29, 2011 Final Draft Report
6 CH August 25, 2011 Final Report
AECOM Signatures
Report Prepared By:
Chris Hamel P.Eng, Associate Vice
President
Report Reviewed By:
Mark Zamojc E.I.T. Municipal Engineer in
Training
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011
Table of Contents
page
1. Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 System Overview .................................................................................................................................. 4
1.3.1 Water Supply and Distribution System .................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Wastewater Collection and Treatment System ....................................................................... 4
2. Population and Employment Projections .................................................................................... 5
2.1 BPE Data June 2011 ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Service Area Projections ...................................................................................................................... 6
3. Related Policy and Criteria ............................................................................................................ 7
3.1 Residential Servicing ............................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Employment Servicing .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 System Security .................................................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Intensification ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3.5 Water Demand and Wastewater Flow Design Criteria ......................................................................... 9
3.5.1 Water Demand Criteria .......................................................................................................... 10 3.5.2 Wastewater Flow Criteria ...................................................................................................... 11
3.6 Costing Criteria ................................................................................................................................... 12 3.7 Development Charges Criteria ........................................................................................................... 18
3.7.1 DC By-Law Structure ............................................................................................................. 18 3.7.2 Existing Capacity ................................................................................................................... 19 3.7.3 Benefit to Existing (Non - Growth) ......................................................................................... 19 3.7.4 DC Eligible Infrastructure ....................................................................................................... 19 3.7.5 Oversizing .............................................................................................................................. 20 3.7.6 Residential/Non Residential .................................................................................................. 21 3.7.7 Project Timing ........................................................................................................................ 22
4. Water Servicing Requirements ................................................................................................... 23
4.1 Water Service Areas ........................................................................................................................... 23 4.2 Water Demand Projections ................................................................................................................. 23 4.3 Water Servicing Flow Schematics ...................................................................................................... 23 4.4 Water Storage Requirements ............................................................................................................. 23
5. Water Capital Program ................................................................................................................ 39
6. Wastewater Servicing Requirements ......................................................................................... 47
6.1 Wastewater Service Areas ................................................................................................................. 47 6.2 Wastewater Flow Projections ............................................................................................................. 47
7. Wastewater Capital Program ...................................................................................................... 50
APPENDIX A Design Criteria Review Executive Summary APPENDIX B Benefit to Existing and Oversizing Calculations APPENDIX C Local Service Guidelines
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011
List of Figures
Figure 1. Sustainable Halton Study Area ................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 2. Study Area Environmental Features ........................................................................................................... 3
Figure 3. Intensification Areas in Burlington and Oakville .......................................................................................... 8
Figure 4. Intensification Areas in Milton, Acton and Georgetown .............................................................................. 8
Figure 5. Water Pressure Zones .............................................................................................................................. 24
Figure 6. Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2011 ..................................................................................................... 31
Figure 7. Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2016 ..................................................................................................... 32
Figure 8. Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2021 ..................................................................................................... 33
Figure 9. Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2026 ..................................................................................................... 34
Figure 10. Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2031 ..................................................................................................... 35
Figure 11. Halton Preferred Water Servicing Strategy ............................................................................................... 46
Figure 12. Halton Wastewater Drainage Areas .......................................................................................................... 48
Figure 13. Halton Preferred Wastewater Servicing Strategy ..................................................................................... 56
List of Tables
Table 1. Halton Region Population Projections to 2031 ........................................................................................... 5
Table 2. Halton Region Employment Projections to 2031 ........................................................................................ 5
Table 3. Service Area Population Projections to 2031.............................................................................................. 6
Table 4. Service Area Employment Projections to 2031 .......................................................................................... 6
Table 5. Sustainable Halton Water Demand Criteria .............................................................................................. 10
Table 6. Sustainable Halton Peaking Factors ......................................................................................................... 10
Table 7. Design Criteria for System Components ................................................................................................... 11
Table 8. Sustainable Halton Wastewater Flow Criteria ........................................................................................... 11
Table 9. Sustainable Halton Wastewater Peak Wastewater Flow Design Criteria ................................................. 12
Table 10. Watermain Benchmark Unit Costs ............................................................................................................ 13
Table 11. Sewer Benchmark Costs ........................................................................................................................... 14
Table 12. Forcemain Benchmark Unit Costs ............................................................................................................ 16
Table 13. Trenchless Installation Unit Costs ............................................................................................................. 16
Table 14. Water Project Splits for the DC By-Law Categories ................................................................................. 21
Table 15. Wastewater Project Splits for the DC By-Law Categories ........................................................................ 22
Table 16. Water Demand Projections ....................................................................................................................... 25
Table 17. Water Storage Requirements ................................................................................................................... 36
Table 18. Water Capital Program .............................................................................................................................. 43
Table 19. Wastewater Flow Projections .................................................................................................................... 49
Table 20. Wastewater Capital Program .................................................................................................................... 53
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 1
1. Overview
1.1 Background
As part of the 2012 Water and Wastewater Development Charges Update, this Technical Report presents the basis for the development of the costs and implementation timing of water and wastewater projects required to service growth in Halton Region between 2012 and 2031. The project costs and implementation timing set out in this report are based on the work undertaken as part of the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan. The Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan has been completed to provide a Region-wide review, evaluation and development of water and wastewater servicing strategies for all urban service areas based on a 2031 planning horizon. This is a comprehensive servicing review for the Region and includes development of strategies for the South Halton systems in Burlington, Oakville, Milton and Halton Hills 401 Corridor as well as the urban systems in Georgetown and Acton. This master planning approach builds on the previous work undertaken as part of the South Halton Master Plans and Updates as well as related studies for the North Halton systems. This Master Plan is a critical component in the integrated planning process of the Sustainable Halton program and provides the framework and vision for the water and wastewater servicing needs for Halton Region to 2031.
1.2 Study Area
The Study Area for the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan encompasses the existing designated urban areas in the Town of Oakville, City of Burlington, Town of Milton and the Town of Halton Hills 401 Corridor as well as the urban areas of Acton and Georgetown (including the hamlets of Stewarttown, Norval, and Glen Williams) located within the Town of Halton Hills. The study area includes development in the existing Urban Built Boundary (Intensification) and new Greenfield development outside of the existing urban areas in Oakville, Milton and Georgetown. The Sustainable Halton Study Area is depicted in Figure 1. The Study Area land use is based on the Halton Regional Official Plan amended by ROPA 25, ROPA 38 and ROPA 39 through the Sustainable Halton growth planning exercise. Through the Sustainable Halton process, Best Planning Estimates (BPE) data for Population, Occupied Dwelling Units and Employment was developed through to year 2031. The BPE data served as the basis for the master planning exercises and was updated in June 2011 (BPE Data June 2011). Integral to the study area and Places To Grow requirements, intensification areas within the Built Boundary across the Region have been identified. The intensification areas are discussed in Section 3 and are focused in Burlington (along the Brant Street and Fairview Street corridors), Oakville (along Kerr Street, in the Trafalgar Road/South of QEW area and south of Dundas Street), Milton (within “historic” Milton) and parts of Georgetown and Acton. Although trunk level servicing of the intensification areas were part of the Sustainable Halton Master Plan, an independent study was undertaken to review the impact on local level infrastructure in these areas.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 2
Figure 1. Sustainable Halton Study Area
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 3
Key Environmental Features for the Sustainable Halton Study Area are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Study Area Environmental Features
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 4
1.3 System Overview
1.3.1 Water Supply and Distribution System
Water supply in the South Halton study area is currently and will continue to be provided by three water purification plant (WPP) facilities (Burlington, Oakville and Burloak WPPs) which treat Lake Ontario source water. The downtown core of Milton will continue to be supplied by groundwater primarily by the Kelso Well Field and WPP. Due to the gradual rise in ground elevation northerly from the shore of Lake Ontario to the lake-based service area boundary in Milton and Halton Hills 401 Corridor, separate pressure zones have been established. Each pressure zone spans an elevation difference of approximately 30 metres. Local distribution watermains are fed from larger trunk feedermains connected between the WPPs, Pumping Stations and Storage Facilities. In North Halton (Acton and Georgetown), treated water is provided by six municipal well fields, including Davidson, Fourth Line, and Prospect Park Well Fields in Acton and Cedarvale, Princess Anne and Lindsay Court Well Fields in Georgetown. Groundwater pumped from the Cedarvale Well Field is treated at the Georgetown WPP. New groundwater based servicing strategies for both Acton and Georgetown have been developed under the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan and include new Well Field, treatment and storage facilities. Due to the significant growth in Georgetown and the fact that the groundwater servicing strategies will not be sufficient to meet its demand, a future extension of the Lake Ontario based South Halton water system to Georgetown is required to service the new growth area.
1.3.2 Wastewater Collection and Treatment System
There are five large wastewater collection systems within Burlington, Oakville and Milton, each of which drain to a wastewater treatment plant. The five wastewater treatment plants are Skyway Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), Oakville Southeast WWTP, Oakville Southwest WWTP, Mid-Halton WWTP and Milton WWTP. The wastewater collection systems in Halton Region may be categorized by the treatment plants that receive and treat wastewater flows. The wastewater collection systems generally consist of smaller local gravity sewers connected to larger sub trunk and trunk sewers. The pumping stations vary in size, with some servicing very localized areas to others servicing significant drainage areas, and have firm pumping capacities ranging from approximately 3 L/s to over 1,500 L/s. The ground elevations sloping from north to south starting in the Milton and northern Burlington and Oakville areas have led to the planning and construction of gravity collection systems which ultimately outlet to Lake Ontario. In areas along the shoreline and at locations which are topographically difficult to service by gravity, wastewater pumping stations and forcemains have been constructed to connect sub-drainage areas to the gravity collection system. Wastewater, which is conveyed by the Milton collection system and treated at the Milton WWTP, is separate from the Burlington and Oakville systems and currently discharges to Sixteen Mile Creek. Wastewater collected in Acton and Georgetown are treated at the Acton WWTP and Georgetown WWTP, respectively. The Acton WWTP discharges to Black Creek, which is a sensitive cold-water fishery. The Georgetown WWTP discharges to Silver Creek which is also a sensitive receiving stream. These stream-based wastewater treatment plants that discharge into local streams are located within the Credit Valley Conservation watershed. Due to significant growth in Georgetown and limitations at the Georgetown WWTP, a future extension of the Lake Ontario based South Halton wastewater system to Georgetown to service the growth area is required.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 5
2. Population and Employment Projections
2.1 BPE Data June 2011
The planning data set is based on the Halton Region BPE Data June 2011. This data was geographically distributed by Traffic Survey Zone (TSZ) and subsequently more discretely to smaller areas identified as Small Geographic Units (SGUs) for Master Planning analyses. The BPE Data June 2011 are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. It should be noted that the BPE Data presented reflects the projections with residential Census undercount which has been identified by Halton Region Planning as approximately 4%. The BPE Data projections have been utilized with Halton Region design criteria to ensure future planning reflects actual future population. As such, the servicing strategies developed under Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan will meet the Province of Ontario Places To Grow target for Halton Region of approximately 780,000 persons and 390,000 employees by 2031. As such, in Table 1 below, the 752,537 population total in 2031 (recognizing undercount) equates to the Places to Grow target of 780,000.
Table 1. Halton Region Population Projections to 2031
Total Population
2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Oakville 165,529 174,780 197,702 221,826 234,122 246,399
Burlington 164,446 173,761 175,438 178,847 182,034 186,169
Milton 53,938 88,438 124,645 161,750 195,735 228,084
Halton Hills 54,978 56,066 57,922 61,672 77,003 91,885
TOTAL 438,891 493,045 555,707 624,094 688,895 752,537
Table 2. Halton Region Employment Projections to 2031
Employment - Employees
2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Oakville 82,089 90,969 106,485 120,796 122,578 128,359
Burlington 87,854 95,656 98,710 102,846 104,145 105,349
Milton 27,232 44,452 62,553 81,106 96,631 114,330
Halton Hills 19,228 19,856 20,744 22,936 32,356 41,962
TOTAL 216,403 250,932 288,493 327,684 355,710 390,000
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 6
2.2 Service Area Projections
The distribution of population and employment growth among the primary geographic regions of the Sustainable Halton Study Area up to year 2031 were prepared in partnership between the Halton Region and the Region’s individual Local Municipalities. The planning data was further reviewed to determine the growth within the existing Built Boundary as well as Greenfield areas. To evaluate the impact on the water and wastewater systems, it is essential to document the population and employment growth in the service areas connected to the municipal systems. The total serviced population and employment includes the Built Boundary areas, designated Greenfield growth areas as well as a small percentage of rural areas on municipal systems but not the rural areas on private systems. The service area projections are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4.
Table 3. Service Area Population Projections to 2031
Serviced Population (Persons)
2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Oakville 165,412 174,655 197,584 221,709 234,007 246,282
Burlington 160,833 170,176 171,919 175,393 178,648 182,834
Milton 48,332 82,752 118,931 155,945 189,587 221,450
Halton Hills 401 Corridor 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total South Halton 374,577 427,583 488,434 553,047 602,242 650,566
Acton 10,233 10,036 9,796 10,379 12,874 13,981
Georgetown 1 37,271 38,708 41,042 44,410 57,452 71,332
Sub-Total North Halton 47,504 48,744 50,838 54,789 70,326 85,313
Total Service Area 2 422,081 476,327 539,272 607,836 672,568 735,879
Rural 16,810 16,718 16,435 16,258 16,327 16,658
Region Total 438,891 493,045 555,707 624,094 688,895 752,537
Note: 1. Georgetown serviced population includes future servicing of Hamlets
2. Projections based on serviced area only (ie: areas connected to municipal systems) and does not include rural population on private systems (BPE Data June 2011)
Table 4. Service Area Employment Projections to 2031
Serviced Employment (Employees)
2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Oakville 82,089 90,969 106,485 120,796 122,578 128,359
Burlington 87,455 94,990 97,952 102,033 103,315 104,508
Milton 25,684 42,792 60,777 79,276 94,723 112,251
Halton Hills 401 Corridor 1,500 1,702 2,179 3,778 11,276 19,204
Sub-Total South Halton 196,728 230,453 267,393 305,883 331,892 364,322
Acton 3,642 3,791 4,085 4,354 4,744 5,071
Georgetown 1 12,663 12,902 13,017 13,341 14,868 16,206
Sub-Total North Halton 16,305 16,693 17,102 17,695 19,612 21,277
Total Service Area 2 213,033 247,146 284,495 323,578 351,504 385,599
Rural 3,370 3,786 3,998 4,106 4,206 4,401
Region Total 216,403 250,932 288,493 327,684 355,710 390,000
Note: 1. Georgetown serviced employment includes future servicing of Hamlets
2. Projections based on serviced area only (ie: areas connected to municipal systems) and does not include rural employment on private systems (BPE Data June 2011)
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 7
3. Related Policy and Criteria
3.1 Residential Servicing
The Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan has reviewed the specific servicing needs for the existing and future residential areas. Residential servicing strategies were developed based on the overall water and wastewater policies and guidelines, Regional servicing standards and guidelines, and servicing needs calculated from planning projections and design criteria. Key considerations for residential servicing are related to providing water supply from the trunk facilities, ensuring adequate trunk facilities extend servicing to the residential areas, providing for extension of local servicing from the trunk infrastructure, allowing for system redundancy, increasing security of supply, and meeting adequate levels of service for residential servicing including pressures and fire flows. The Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan focused the analysis on the trunk facilities. As such, the trunk facilities must provide sufficient level of service to account for future extension of local servicing.
3.2 Employment Servicing
Similar to residential servicing, the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan has reviewed the specific servicing needs for the existing and future employment areas. Employment strategies and considerations are similar to those for residential servicing. Of note, the fire flow requirements in employment areas can have greater needs.
3.3 System Security
In addition to the traditional growth related needs evaluated under the Master Plan, review was undertaken of the existing systems and the ability to continue to convey flows and provide adequate level of service to support growth. Critical areas of the trunk water system were identified as requiring improved transmission capacity. The new projects addressed concerns such as isolated service areas, single feeds across significant features such as major highways, support for emergency shut down conditions, and overall capacity for future growth flows.
3.4 Intensification
Given the focus of intensification within the Built Boundary for future growth in Halton Region, as per conformity with Places To Grow, Sustainable Halton Master Plan undertook a specific analysis for the impact of intensification on the systems. This analysis investigated the impacts of intensification on the core area of the following municipalities:
Burlington Oakville Milton Georgetown Acton
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 8
These areas are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. The orange shading represents the areas where intensification will occur and areas bounded in red are the major urban centres.
Figure 3. Intensification Areas in Burlington and Oakville
Figure 4. Intensification Areas in Milton, Acton and Georgetown
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 9
Beyond typical Master Planning level analysis focusing on trunk infrastructure, the intensification analysis undertaken in Sustainable Halton was completed to a greater level of detail. In addition to referencing the BPE data, further review of the potential location of the growth within the intensification areas was undertaken to better estimate and focus growth within these areas. This approach provided a better indication of potential impact on existing watermains and sewers (local infrastructure). Using the full pipe models allowed for a capacity review of existing local infrastructure systems, and determined if upgrades would be required to maintain an expected level of service based on a higher density of residential and employment needs. As a result, the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan provides recommendations on trunk infrastructure and also the local infrastructure (distribution mains and small sewers) within the intensification areas. It should be noted that the intensification infrastructure requirements are based on best available information and depending on the actual intensification proposals, may require further review and revision.
3.5 Water Demand and Wastewater Flow Design Criteria
It has been typical practice to review the design criteria as part of the recent Master Plan updates for Halton Region. The focus of the design criteria review is to assess the residential and employment water demand consumptions and wastewater flow generations. This is common practice to ensure that the projected water and wastewater flows are accurate and reflect new trends to support decision making for the sizing and timing of future infrastructure including pipes and facilities. The approach taken under Sustainable Halton has been more intensive than in the past. Not only to ensure the projections are reasonable, but the review was considered more critical in light of perceived and/or actual changes in recent water use/wastewater generation as well as greater emphasis in categorizing future development in Greenfield areas and intensification areas within the Built Boundary. The approach to project flows under previous Master Plans was to apply the design criteria to the horizon year planning projections. This approach was reconciled against historical flows but was not necessarily influenced by historical trends. The approach moving forward is based on establishing a yearly starting point, calculated from historical flows, and projecting growth flows from this starting point forward. This approach is being implemented in the Development Control Monitoring Report as well as the Master Plan processes and will ensure continuity in projections. This approach will also better serve reconciliation through the allocation processes. An overall guiding principle for the design criteria is to ensure that flow projections are adequately predicted with an appropriate level of safety and acceptable risk. Existing and future infrastructure must have sufficient capacity to meet servicing requirements without compromising operation of the facilities or impede approved and committed growth. On this basis, for Master Planning purposes, the design criteria should reflect a total production need which includes consumption and non-revenue water use. The design criteria review involved analysis of historical plant production/treatment data, historical water consumption data, sample area water consumption data, district water metering areas (DMAs) and historical peaking factors at the plant. The review of design criteria is summarized in the technical memorandum entitled “Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Design Criteria Review – Executive Summary”, AECOM, December 2010, (Appendix A).
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 10
Based on the design criteria review and analysis, it has been recommended that the existing South Halton lake based design criteria be applied system-wide such that all new Greenfield growth service areas utilize the common criteria. Similarly, the previous groundwater based design criteria should be maintained in existing urban areas (including intensification) which rely on this water source. The design criteria review also recognized continued opportunity for decreasing water consumption and water use efficiency/conservation (achieved through water efficiency measures such as the new building code) associated with new residential growth on a go forward basis. It was determined that an overall 5% reduction in total water demands would be applied to the water projections to account for efficiency and conservation.
3.5.1 Water Demand Criteria
The water demand criteria, including peaking factors, are summarized in the following tables. Residential criteria is based on population. Employment criteria is based on employees.
Table 5. Sustainable Halton Water Demand Criteria
Average Day Water Design Criteria
Lpcd Residential 330
L/emp/d Industrial 302
Commercial 213
Institutional 74
Table 6. Sustainable Halton Peaking Factors
Water Design Criteria Max PF Peak PF
Lake Based Oakville, Burlington,
Milton, Georgetown
1.9 3
Groundwater Based Milton
1.6 Georgetown
Acton
In order to address the decreasing water consumption trends and opportunity for water conservation/efficiency moving forward, as noted above, the base water design criteria shown in Table 5 and Table 6 was not reduced. However, the total projected demands calculated using the criteria were reduced by 5%. In essence, applying a total reduction of 5% to the total projected demands provides a better estimate for future water demands on the system. This reduction may also provide opportunity to reduce the total required capacity of key infrastructure and may also allow the opportunity to defer timing of new infrastructure. For water projects, the water needs were based on the water supply requirements for the service area. The water supply requirements are based on maximum day demands (Max PF) for areas with sufficient water storage volume and peak hour demands (Peak PF) for areas without storage.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 11
Sizing of the water system components was based on the following criteria:
The watermains making up the local distribution system were sized for the greater of maximum day demands plus fire flow or peak hour demands.
The pumping facilities, feedermains and storage facilities were sized based on the maximum day
demands or peak hour demands without storage.
The water treatment plant facilities were sized based on the maximum day demands.
The water demands associated with the respective projects are determined using the best planning estimate data for residential and non-residential users and applying the design criteria.
Table 7. Design Criteria for System Components
Pumping Stations With adequate zone storage available
Maximum day flow to zone and all subsequent zones
Without adequate storage available Peak hour flow to zone and maximum day flow to all subsequent zones
Storage A - Equalization 25% of maximum day demand
B - Fire Largest expected fire in zone (based on land use)
C - Emergency Minimum of 25% of (A+B)
Total = A+B+C
Fire flow Minimum flow (residential) 5,500 L/min for 2 hours @ minimum 140 kPa (20 psi)
Minimum flow (industrial/ commercial/institutional)
15,000 L/min for 3 hours @ minimum 140 Pa (20 psi)
System pressure Normal operating conditions 280 kPa (40 psi) to 700 kPa (100 psi)
3.5.2 Wastewater Flow Criteria
The wastewater flow criteria is summarized as follows:
Table 8. Sustainable Halton Wastewater Flow Criteria
Design Criteria Average Flows
Lpcd Residential 365
L/emp/d Industrial 410
Commercial 260
Institutional 135
The 365 Lpcd residential average flow criteria includes a flow component for average level of extraneous flow allowance
(90 Lpcd). This criteria is used to estimate flows at a WWTP catchment level. A residential flow criteria of 275 Lpcd is
used for calculation of peak flows at a collection system level.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 12
Table 9. Sustainable Halton Wastewater Peak Wastewater Flow Design Criteria
Area Halton Inflow and Infiltration
Design Allowance (L/s/ha)
All existing and new wastewater treatment plant service areas (except
those identified below). 0.2861
Milton WWTP 0.24 to 1.0
Oakville Southwest WWTP 0.40 to 3.0
Skyway WWTP existing service area 0.35 to 0.65
Notes: 1. Regional design criteria
Residential flows are calculated using average dry weather flow criteria of 275 Lpcd. ICI flows are
calculated using the values contained in Table 8. Total peak flows are calculated using the total dry
weather flows peaked using the Halton standard modified Harman formula plus the extraneous flows.
For wastewater projects, the infrastructure capacity requirements within the service areas were based on the peak flows for the collection system components and based on projected average day loadings and flows for the treatment facilities. Although the plant’s physical components including tankage must accommodate the peak flows, historical convention has been to rate wastewater treatment plants at average day flows. Sizing of the wastewater system components was based on the following criteria:
The sewers and pumping facilities making up the collection system were sized for peak flows, which are calculated using the peak dry weather flows and the Halton Inflow and Infiltration Design Allowance.
The wastewater treatment plant facilities were based on the average day flow which includes the extraneous flow allowance.
The wastewater flows associated with the respective projects are determined using the best planning estimates for residential and non-residential users and applying the design criteria.
3.6 Costing Criteria
The approach to developing cost estimates for the respective projects was based on an updated approach from the previous 2008 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Update and DC process. Base construction costs were developed using a unit cost approach. These unit costs have been updated from the previous 2008 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Update and reflect current 2012 market conditions. They have been inflated using a value of 9.6% which is based on the Statistics Canada Quarterly Construction Price Statistics (Catalogue number 62-007). The update to the unit costs has considered trends in materials, labour, other market conditions and recent tendered projects within the Greater Toronto and Golden Horseshoe areas. Based on a similar approach undertaken during the previous Master Plan and Development Charges processes, the unit costs were developed for linear infrastructure including watermains, forcemains and for sewers with more shallow installations (5m depth) and maximum depth for open cut installations (10m depth). Additional trenchless installation (including tunneling) unit rates were developed. These rates are summarized in Table 10 through Table 13 .
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 13
Table 10. Watermain Benchmark Unit Costs
Nom.Pipe Outer Depth to Min Excavation Bedding Pipe Backfill Subtotal Restoration Total Unit
Size Diameter invert Trench width Volume Cost Volume Cost Cost Install Vol Cost Unit Costs Costs
(mm) (m) (m) (m) (m3) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (2012 $/m)
400 0.50 3.0 1.00 5.25 153 0.9 48 280 53 4 51 585 117 701
450 0.55 3.0 1.00 5.25 153 0.9 48 308 53 4 51 613 117 730
500 0.60 3.0 1.20 6.3 184 1.2 61 341 53 5 60 699 117 816
600 0.73 3.0 1.20 6.3 184 1.2 62 412 150 5 60 868 117 985
750 0.90 3.0 1.70 8.925 261 1.9 101 590 150 7 82 1,183 117 1,300
900 1.10 4.0 1.90 13.3 388 2.3 120 771 150 11 129 1,558 117 1,675
1050 1.26 4.0 2.06 14.42 421 2.6 136 1,028 175 12 138 1,899 117 2,016
1200 1.42 4.0 2.42 16.94 495 3.3 174 1,285 204 14 159 2,318 117 2,434
1350 1.62 4.5 2.62 20.6325 603 3.8 197 1,741 280 17 197 3,019 117 3,135
1500 1.80 4.5 2.80 22.05 644 4.2 220 2,185 321 18 209 3,579 117 3,695
1650 1.98 4.5 3.00 23.625 690 4.7 245 2,378 351 19 222 3,885 117 4,002
1800 2.15 5.0 3.15 27.5625 805 5.0 265 2,675 368 23 263 4,376 117 4,493
2100 2.45 5.0 3.50 30.625 895 6.0 314 2,892 368 25 288 4,756 117 4,873
($/m3)
COST OF EXCAVATION & DISPOSAL (OPEN CUT BANKS @ 1:1)
29
COST OF BEDDING PIPE SURROUNDING INCLUDES SUPPLY AND PLACING 53
BACKFILL TRENCH INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF NATIVE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION 12
Valve & Chamber Cost Inclusive of Purchase and Installation
Diameter Cost
(mm) ($)
400 18,819
450 18,819
500 18,819
600 18,819
750 18,819
900 48,089
1050 77,358
1200 106,628
1350 135,897
1500 165,167
1650 194,436
1800 223,706
2100 282,244
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 14
Table 11. Sewer Benchmark Costs
i) 5m Depth
Nom.Pipe Outer Depth to Excavation Granular Bedding Pipe Backfill Restoration Restoration Subtotal Unit Landscape Const. Access Total Unit
Size Diameter invert Volume Cost Volume Cost Cost Install Vol Cost Costs Allowance Allowance Costs
(mm) (m) (m) (m3) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) (m) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (2012 $/m)
375 0.52 5 5.60 164 1.0 55 81 41 4.56 53 8.38 98 491 0 0 491
450 0.58 5 5.90 172 1.1 59 103 41 4.77 56 8.45 99 530 0 0 530
525 0.655 5 6.28 183 1.2 65 124 41 5.04 59 8.53 100 572 0 0 572
600 0.755 5 6.78 198 1.4 73 175 41 5.39 63 8.60 100 650 0 0 650
675 0.88 5 8.40 245 1.9 99 257 49 6.52 76 9.68 113 839 0 0 839
750 0.97 5 8.85 258 2.0 107 339 49 6.81 80 9.75 114 947 0 0 947
825 1.055 5 9.28 271 2.2 115 394 49 7.08 83 9.83 115 1,027 0 0 1,027
900 1.14 5 9.70 283 2.4 124 472 49 7.34 86 9.90 116 1,130 0 0 1,130
975 1.23 5 10.15 296 2.5 133 544 49 7.62 89 10.98 128 1,240 0 0 1,240
1050 1.32 5 11.60 339 3.1 162 623 49 8.51 99 11.05 129 1,401 12 58 1,472
1200 1.455 5 12.28 359 3.4 178 780 49 8.89 104 11.20 131 1,601 11.6834 58.417 1,671
1350 1.67 5 13.35 390 3.9 204 958 55 9.48 111 11.35 133 1,850 11.6834 58.417 1,920
1500 1.805 5 14.03 410 4.2 220 1,171 55 9.84 115 12.50 146 2,116 11.6834 58.417 2,187
1800 2.16 5 15.80 461 5.1 266 1,694 55 10.74 125 12.80 150 2,752 11.6834 58.417 2,822
2100 2.51 5 17.55 513 6.0 314 2,255 65 11.58 135 13.10 153 3,435 11.6834 58.417 3,505
2400 2.88 5 19.40 567 7.0 368 2,991 65 12.41 145 13.40 157 4,292 11.6834 58.417 4,362
3000 3.56 5 22.80 666 9.0 474 4,592 65 13.78 161 14.00 164 6,122 11.6834 58.417 6,192
($/m3)
COST OF EXCAVATION & DISPOSAL 29
COST OF GRANULAR BEDDING PIPE SURROUNDING INCLUDES SUPPLY AND PLACING 53
RESTORATION ALLOWANCE 12
BACKFILL TRENCH INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF NATIVE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION 12
Manholes Inclusive of Purchase and Installation
Diameter Cost
(mm) ($)
1500 17,525
1800 29,209
2400 40,892
3000 52,575
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 15
ii) 10m Depth
Nom.Pipe Outer Depth to Excavation Granular Bedding Pipe Backfill Restoration Restoration Subtotal Unit Landscape Const. Access Total Unit
Size Diameter invert Volume Cost Volume Cost Cost Install Vol Cost Costs Allowance Allowance Costs
(mm) (m) (m) (m3) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) (m) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (2012$/m)
375 0.52 10 35.20 1,439 1.0 55 81 41 34 399 15.4 180 2,195 0 0 2,195
450 0.58 10 35.80 1,464 1.1 59 103 41 35 405 15.6 182 2,254 0 0 2,254
525 0.655 10 36.55 1,495 1.2 65 124 41 35 413 15.8 185 2,322 0 0 2,322
600 0.755 10 37.55 1,535 1.4 73 175 41 36 422 16 187 2,434 0 0 2,434
675 0.88 10 38.80 1,587 1.9 99 257 49 37 431 16.2 189 2,612 0 0 2,612
750 0.97 10 39.70 1,623 2.0 107 339 49 38 440 16.4 192 2,750 0 0 2,750
825 1.055 10 40.55 1,658 2.2 115 394 49 38 448 17 199 2,863 0 0 2,863
900 1.14 10 41.40 1,693 2.4 124 472 49 39 456 17.2 201 2,995 0 0 2,995
975 1.23 10 42.30 1,730 2.9 152 544 49 39 460 17.4 203 3,139 0 0 3,139
1050 1.32 10 43.20 1,767 3.1 162 623 49 40 469 17.6 206 3,275 12 58 3,345
1200 1.455 10 44.55 1,822 3.4 178 780 49 41 481 17.8 208 3,518 12 58 3,588
1350 1.67 10 46.70 1,910 3.9 204 958 55 43 500 17.8 208 3,834 12 58 3,905
1500 1.805 10 48.05 1,965 4.7 245 1,171 55 43 507 18 210 4,153 12 58 4,223
1800 2.16 10 51.60 2,110 5.6 295 1,694 55 46 537 18.4 215 4,906 12 58 4,976
2100 2.51 10 55.10 2,253 6.6 347 2,255 65 49 567 19.4 227 5,713 12 58 5,784
2400 2.88 10 58.80 2,404 7.7 404 2,991 65 51 597 20 234 6,696 12 58 6,766
3000 3.56 10 65.60 2,683 9.9 518 4,592 65 56 651 21.6 252 8,761 12 58 8,831
($/m3)
COST OF EXCAVATION 41
COST OF GRANULAR BEDDING PIPE SURROUNDING INCLUDES SUPPLY AND PLACING 53
RESTORATION ALLOWANCE 12
BACKFILL TRENCH INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF NATIVE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION 12
Manholes Inclusive of Purchase and Installation
Diameter Cost
(mm) ($)
1500 29,209
1800 51,407
2400 75,942
3000 100,477
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 16
Table 12. Forcemain Benchmark Unit Costs
Nom.Pipe Outer Depth to Min Excavation Bedding Pipe Backfill Subtotal Restoration Total
Size Diameter invert Trench width Volume Cost Volume Cost Cost Install Vol Cost Unit Costs
mm m m m m3 $/m m3 $/m $/m $/m m3 $/m Costs $/m (2012$/m)
150 0.17 3 0.8 2.3 $67 0.34 $18 $37 45 2 $23 $190 $117 $307
200 0.22 3 0.8 2.5 $72 0.39 $21 $61 45 2 $24 $223 $117 $340
250 0.28 3 0.9 2.6 $76 0.45 $24 $105 77 2 $26 $308 $117 $425
300 0.33 3 0.9 2.8 $81 0.50 $27 $140 77 2 $27 $351 $117 $468
350 0.39 3 1.0 3.0 $86 0.56 $30 $308 77 2 $27 $528 $117 $645
400 0.50 3 1.00 5.3 $152 0.9 $48 $331 97 4 $52 $680 $117 $797
450 0.55 3 1.00 5.3 $152 0.9 $48 $473 97 4 $52 $823 $117 $940
500 0.60 3 1.20 6.3 $183 1.2 $61 $570 97 5 $62 $973 $117 $1,090
600 0.73 3 1.70 8.9 $259 1.8 $98 $626 220 7 $85 $1,287 $117 $1,404
750 0.90 3 1.70 8.9 $259 1.9 $101 $699 250 7 $84 $1,393 $117 $1,510
900 1.10 3 1.90 10.0 $289 2.3 $121 $838 300 8 $92 $1,640 $117 $1,757
1050 1.26 3 2.06 10.8 $314 2.6 $137 $1,106 300 8 $99 $1,955 $117 $2,072
($/m3)
COST OF EXCAVATION 29
COST OF BEDDING PIPE SURROUNDING INCLUDES SUPPLY AND PLACING 53
BACKFILL TRENCH INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF NATIVE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION 12
Table 13. Trenchless Installation Unit Costs
Diameter Cost/m Diameter Cost/m
<= 350 $ 1,000 975 $ 8,696
375 $ 4,564 1050 $ 9,212
400 $ 4,736 1200 $ 10,245
450 $ 5,080 1350 $ 11,278
525 $ 5,597 1500 $ 12,311
600 $ 6,113 1650 $ 13,344
675 $ 6,630 1800 $ 14,377
750 $ 7,146 2100 $ 16,443
825 $ 7,663 2400 $ 18,510
900 $ 8,179 3000 $ 22,642
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 17
For each linear project, a review of potential additional costs was undertaken. Unique conditions such as additional rock excavation, property, natural feature crossings, tunneling (resulting from infrastructure depth or crossings), etc. were estimated separately. Also, for the vertical projects, specific preliminary cost estimates were developed to reflect current tendered construction conditions. Where available, more detailed construction cost estimates from studies or preliminary designs were utilized. Based on the information available for the major facilities, including water treatment plant expansions, wastewater treatment plant expansions, water pumping stations, wastewater pumping stations, and reservoirs, the cost estimates for these projects referenced either recent project estimates or recent tender prices within the Greater Toronto and Golden Horseshoe Area. Many of these projects had undergone recent Class EA studies or preliminary/detailed design phases and had construction estimates available. For all projects, a sub-total construction cost was established for each project based on the base unit cost and additional costs. These master planning (conceptual) level cost estimates are reflective of cost estimates which typically range between levels of +50% / -25%. To account for total project engineering costs and contingency, 35% of the construction cost was added to each project. In general, the project cost estimating process as described above can be summarized as follows: + $ generated from construction base unit costs + $ for additional unique construction requirements (crossings, others, …) = $ subtotal for construction + $ subtotal for construction * 1.35 for engineering (internal and external costs) and contingency= $ total cost for project Due to the program uniquely identified for intensification within the Built Boundary, different unit cost estimates were developed for project within the existing urban areas. These unit costs were higher than Greenfield unit costs due to:
Urban construction area impacts Utility coordination, mitigation and diversion Urban reinstatement Small project mobilization Other contingencies
The construction cost and engineering/contingency cost make up the total project costs in 2012 dollars only and do not reflect inflated costs at the time of implementation.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 18
3.7 Development Charges Criteria
3.7.1 DC By-Law Structure
The total infrastructure program developed under Sustainable Halton has been categorized to meet the DC By-Law structure as follows:
Capacity Distribution – Greenfield Distribution – Built Boundary
The definition of infrastructure to be included in each DC By-Law structure category is described below. Capacity This category represents projects related to Region-wide needs of water supply/treatment and wastewater treatment. The projects included under this definition are:
all studies all projects related to the Water Purification Plants (WPPs) and groundwater Well Fields all projects related to the Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs)
From a linear infrastructure perspective, the capacity category also represents projects that aid in the transfer/conveyance of capacity AND defer/eliminate the need for immediate treatment plant or well field expansions. The projects included under this definition are:
Major trunk infrastructure that facilitate transmission of water from existing WPPs to Burlington, Oakville, Milton and Halton Hills Zone 1 Feedermain from Burloak WPP to Kitchen Reservoir/Pumping Station (PS) Zone 1 Feedermain to Washburn Reservoir/PS Zone 1 Feedermain to Davis Road PS Zone 3 PS at Appleby Reservoir Zone 4 Feedermain to future Zone 4 Reservoir (north of Britannia Road) Zone 6 PS at future Zone 4 Reservoir Zone 6 Feedermain to No. 10 Sideroad
Major trunk infrastructure that facilitate conveyance of wastewater to existing WWTPs Boyne Trunk Sewer 8th Line Trunk Sewer (No. 10 Sideroad to Steeles Ave.)
Distribution – Greenfield This category represents projects that support Greenfield growth outside the current Urban Built Boundary (2006) and within the new Sustainable Halton Urban Boundary (2031). The projects under this definition can include:
Infrastructure located in the Greenfield service area Infrastructure located within the built boundary that convey flow to future growth areas Infrastructure including pipes, pumping stations and storage facilities
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 19
Distribution – Built Boundary This category represents projects that support growth within the current Urban Built Boundary only as defined under the Places to Grow process. This includes growth out to year 2031 related to infill within the Urban Built Boundary as well as focused intensification within the identified nodes, such as the Urban Growth Centres (UGCs), and corridors as identified under Sustainable Halton. The projects under this definition can include:
Infrastructure physically located within the Urban Built Boundary Infrastructure servicing only intensification and infill growth within the Urban Built Boundary Infrastructure identified under the detailed nodes (UGCs) and corridors servicing review for
intensification completed as part of the Sustainable Halton Master Plan
3.7.2 Existing Capacity
The servicing strategies were developed consistent with servicing policies identified in the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan. In general, particularly for major facilities, the strategies are based on maximizing existing capacity in the facilities and scheduling capacity expansions on a just-in-time basis while ensuring operational effectiveness, flexibility and security to the system and users is not compromised. As such, at the time of expansion, there is generally an amount of existing capacity remaining. However, this amount of existing capacity, typically in the order of 5 – 10%, is needed in the system to ensure adequate level of service is maintained. This existing capacity has been present through historical expansions and will be present through future expansions. Each DC period has benefitted from previous existing capacity. Under this program, there is no allowance for existing capacity at the existing facilities.
3.7.3 Benefit to Existing (Non - Growth)
The non-growth component has typically been identified for certain projects which benefit the existing service area. These components are typically associated with upgrades to the existing systems or facilities necessary to maintain service levels to existing residential and non-residential users. These projects may also involve upgrades or expansions which provide additional capacity to meet growth in the service area. When considering intensification, critical security/redundancy requirements and impacts on critical existing trunk infrastructure, additional projects within the existing service area were identified. As well, it should be noted that there were some benefit to existing (non-growth) components within a small number of infrastructure capital projects that are predominantly required to service growth in new urban areas. With triggers ranging from growth to security/redundancy requirements, the growth related and non-growth related needs and corresponding capacity and costs for each of these projects have been separately identified. Detailed information regarding the allocated costs to Benefit to Existing (non-growth) for each project is shown in Appendix B.
3.7.4 DC Eligible Infrastructure
The minimum size criteria for DC eligible infrastructure described in the local service guidelines provided in Appendix C. The minimum criteria for DC eligible watermains is greater than 400 mm internal to the development and greater than and including 400 mm external to the development. For sewers, the minimum criteria for DC eligible sewers is greater than 450 mm diameter.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 20
The capital program reflects projects which are equal to or exceed the minimum diameter criteria inclusion for DC eligible projects. However, there are a few instances where certain projects are below this minimum diameter criteria. Given that these projects meet the intent to service and benefit growth areas well beyond the requirements of a single subdivision within the overall study areas, they are considered DC eligible projects. In addition, within smaller systems such the northern communities of Georgetown and Acton, the trunk system is typically smaller diameter than in South Halton. As such, some infrastructure has been included below the minimum diameter criteria given that these pipes provide trunk distribution/conveyance. Based on conformity with Places To Grow, 40% of future growth as of 2015 will take place as intensification within the existing built area. This intensification will impact local servicing as well as trunk servicing. The intensification demands and flows have been considered in the overall capacities of trunk infrastructure including feedermains, trunk sewers, pumping stations, storage facilities and treatment plants. As noted, an independent analysis of intensification impact was undertaken. This analysis resulted in additional intensification projects located within the existing local systems (critical for implementation and to be considered based on monitoring, respectively). Given that these projects service future growth similar to Greenfield areas, the projects have been classified as DC eligible infrastructure regardless of their size.
3.7.5 Oversizing
Although the development charge planning horizon is to year 2031, it is good engineering practice to provide sufficient capacity to meet servicing requirements beyond 20 years, particularly for larger diameter trunk piping and major structural components of major supply facilities. In addition, the sizing and capacity determined for 2031 needs must also provide a sufficient level of service to the new growth areas, ensure efficient integration with existing infrastructure, and not negatively impact current operations of the systems. Even after making this latter allowance, some infrastructure has been sized to meet needs beyond the development charge planning horizon. Review of the infrastructure capacity indicated that oversizing was required for some of the trunk facilities. This review showed that for projects with smaller diameter pipes which typically serviced more localized areas, many of these localized areas had only marginal additional flows beyond 2031. The trunk projects which service larger areas service a larger amount of flows beyond 2031. Also, the smaller diameter infrastructure typically cannot be downsized without impacting the system such as water pressures and fire flows for the water system and increased velocities and surcharging for the wastewater system. Accordingly, the oversizing requirements have been identified for some water feedermain, wastewater trunk sewers and water and wastewater treatment plants. Quantifying oversizing for these projects has been determined based on comparison of the infrastructure required to meet 2031 needs versus the recommended infrastructure sizing. The difference in cost for the recommended size of infrastructure and the size of infrastructure to meet the 2031 horizon has been allocated as the oversizing cost. Any oversizing identified through this analysis has been deducted from the 2031 DC recoverable costs and is to be recovered through subsequent DC by-law(s) covering the post 2031 period. It should be noted that the 2002 Master Plan as well as the 2007 Master Plan Update considered infrastructure sizing to an urban boundary built out scenario (2031) and post 2021 considerations respectively. Some projects previously oversized to meet the 2031 horizon are now integrated into the current Sustainable Halton program and now no longer have oversizing based on the current 2031 bylaw period. Appendix B provides more detailed information regarding each project allocated costs to Oversizing (post period growth).
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 21
3.7.6 Residential/Non Residential
The development charge eligible share of the capital program included in this Technical Report has been split between benefit to residential development versus benefit to non-residential development within each DC By-Law category. The Residential/Non-Residential split is based on the percentage of the total anticipated flow increase to be generated by each class of development. This is the standard calculation approach which has been applied by other municipalities (e.g. Peel Region, York Region) and was similarly used during the 2004 and 2008 Halton DC update. A revision of the 2008 Halton DC Update involves the application of Residential/Non-Residential splits across the full Region as opposed to differentiation between North and South Halton. In addition, the Residential/Non-Residential splits have been calculated for each DC By-Law category. The capacity category is based on Region-wide calculated flows. The Distribution – Greenfield category is based on flows calculated for the Greenfield areas only. The Distribution – Built Boundary category is based on flows calculated for the growth within the 2006 Urban Built Boundary only. For water projects, the splits are based on the maximum day demand attributed to the growth from year 2012 to year 2031. Similarly, for wastewater projects, the splits are based on average day wet weather wastewater flows for the growth from 2012 to 2031. The growth related flows have been calculated using the serviced area projections previously summarized in Table 3 and Table 4. The Residential/Non-Residential contributions based on demands and flows for each DC By-Law category are shown in the following tables.
Table 14. Water Project Splits for the DC By-Law Categories
Category Planning Projections Growth Related Water
Demands (MLD)
Percentage
2011 (pop,empl)
2031 (pop,empl)
2012-2031 Growth
(pop,empl)
Capacity (Region Wide Split)
Residential 476,327 735,879 259,552 153.4 72%
Non-Residential 247,146 385,599 138,453 59.6 28%
Total 213.0 100%
Distribution – Greenfield
Residential 57,831 244,917 187,086 111.1 74%
Non-Residential 22,582 111,809 89,227 39.7 26%
Total 150.8 100%
Distribution – Built Boundary
Residential 418,496 490,962 72,466 42.3 68%
Non-Residential 224,564 273,790 49,226 19.9 32%
Total 62.2 100%
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 22
Table 15. Wastewater Project Splits for the DC By-Law Categories
Category Planning Projections Growth Related
Wastewater Flows (MLD)
Percentage
2011 (pop,empl)
2031 (pop,empl)
2012-2031 Growth
(pop,empl)
Capacity (Region Wide Split)
Residential Needs 476,327 735,879 259,552 94.8 69%
Non-Residential Needs 247,146 385,599 138,453 42.1 31%
Total Needs 136.9 100%
Distribution – Greenfield
Residential Needs 57,831 244,917 187,086 68.4 71%
Non-Residential Needs 22,582 111,809 89,227 28.2 29%
Total Needs 96.6 100%
Distribution – Built Boundary
Residential Needs 418,496 490,962 72,466 26.4 66%
Non-Residential Needs 224,564 273,790 49,226 13.9 34%
Total Needs 40.3 100%
3.7.7 Project Timing
Under the Sustainable Halton Master Plan, the scope of each project and the timing for the 2021 program was updated from the previous servicing strategy based on the BPE Data June 2011 and status of the current implementation program. The timing for the projects servicing the new growth areas out to 2031 were also developed based on the BPE Data June 2011 and realistic phasing opportunities co-ordinated with Regional planning. This process took into consideration a logical extension of growth from the existing development. The evaluation of timing also took into consideration the availability of and need to maximize the use of existing infrastructure and best judgement on reasonable timing of subsequent expansions. For the major facility expansions, such as the Burloak WPP and Mid-Halton WWTP, single larger expansions have been considered to minimize the construction periods at the site and avoid scheduling subsequent work immediately following completion of the previous project. Notwithstanding the larger expansions proposed for the near term, the 2031 capacity needs as well as the potential mature state capacity needs beyond 2031 have triggered the requirement for additional future expansion of the Burloak WPP and Mid-Halton WWTP. These future expansions will provide capacity beyond the 2031 planning horizon. Project timing was also integrated with the results of recent Transportation studies, Class Environmental Assessment Studies Reports and Master Plans (2011) to endeavour to schedule underground infrastructure before completion of road improvements. This did result in several projects being moved forward.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 23
4. Water Servicing Requirements
4.1 Water Service Areas
The service areas were reviewed for each project through determination of the project’s location as well as its relationship to the overall system operation. Evaluation of the planning data and ultimately the project requirements was completed through summarizing the water demands for the following geographic areas:
Complete lake-based service area (i.e., serviced by all WPPs) Milton well-based service area (i.e., serviced by Milton wells) Acton well-based service area (i.e., serviced by Acton wells) Georgetown well-based service area (i.e., serviced by Georgetown wells) Pressure zones and downstream pressure zones (i.e., serviced by pumping stations and feedermains) Localized TSZs (i.e., serviced by local trunk watermains).
The Halton Region water pressure zones are depicted in Figure 5. As noted, the pressure zones are identified by the local municipality. Oakville is serviced by 4 primary pressure zones O1, O2, O3 and O4 with sub-pressure zones fed through isolated supply points (O2A). Burlington is serviced by 5 pressure zones B1, B2, B3, B4 and B5 as well as B1A for the Aldershot area, B1B and B5B for the areas in North Aldershot serviced by Hamilton such as Bridgeview, and B3A, B4A and B5A for the future growth areas in North Aldershot which have significant change in topography. Milton is serviced by 2 lake-based pressure zones M4L, which will be interconnected with O4, and M5L. Milton also maintains a groundwater-based pressure zone M5G. The Acton groundwater system is pressure zone A9G. The Georgetown groundwater system include pressure zones G5G, G6G and G7G. It is also proposed to service the new growth in Georgetown by Lake Based supply which will be designated as pressure zone G6L.
4.2 Water Demand Projections
Based on the June 2011 BPE data and Design Criteria, the Halton Water Demand Projections have been established and are summarized in Table 16.
4.3 Water Servicing Flow Schematics
In order to evaluate the water servicing requirements including immediate pressure zone demands as well as capacity required to service subsequent pressure zones, water servicing flow schematics were developed for each of the planning intervals. The flow schematics are depicted in Figure 6 through Figure 10.
4.4 Water Storage Requirements
A summary of the water storage requirements by pressure zone is provided in Table 17.
Halton Hills
Milton
Oakville
Burlington
NO 15
DERRY
DUNDAS
SIX
TH
TR
AF
AL
GA
R
AP
PL
EB
Y
NO 5
HIGHWAY 407
NO 25
FIF
TH
LAKESHORE
HIGHWAY 401
GU
ELP
H
WA
LKE
R'S
SE
CO
ND
TR
EM
AIN
E
NO 20
FO
UR
TH
NEW
MAIN
TW
ISS
DU
BL
IN
QUEEN ELIZABETH WAY
FIR
ST
TE
NT
H
NIN
TH
NO 10
KIN
G
BR
AN
T
REBECCA
FAIRVIEW
NO 1
UPPER MIDDLE
BR
ON
TE
SPEERS
NO 17
MIL
BU
RO
UG
H
FO
RD
NO 30
MAINWAY
HIGHWAY 7
TH
OM
PS
ON
NO 3
WIN
ST
ON
CH
UR
CH
ILL
CE
DA
R S
PR
ING
S
CAMPBELLVILLE
EIG
HT
H
DO
RV
AL
RE
GIO
NA
L R
OA
D 2
5
HIGHWAY 403
STEELES
TH
IRD
HARVESTER KE
RR
NO 14
MILL
CORNWALL
NO 2
BURNHAMTHORPE
MC
NIV
EN
LOWER BASE
NO 4
NE
YA
GA
WA
BRITAN NIA
MAPLE
NO 32
MA
RT
IN
NA
SS
AG
AW
EY
A-E
SQ
UE
SIN
G
BU
RL
OA
K
MO
UN
TA
INV
IEW
ON
TA
RIO
PE
RU
NORTH SERVICE
KELSO
COLLING
NO 8
BL
IND
PLAINS
REID
KILBRIDE
BE
LL S
CH
OO
L
RIVER
WA
TE
RD
OW
N
NO 22
ES
QU
ES
ING
NO 28
NO 27
HIG
HW
AY
6
CAMPBELL
NA
SS
AG
AW
EY
A-P
US
CH
LIN
CH CH
UR
CH
ILL
ROYAL WINDSOR
NORTH SHORE
BO
ST
ON
CH
UR
CH
CLAYHILL
CH
AR
TW
ELL
FALLBROOK
AUBURN
WYECROFT
MO
RR
ISO
N
NO
TT
ING
HIL
L
HO
RN
BY
EA
ST
PO
RT
CO
NF
ED
ER
AT
ION
RE
YN
OL
DS
CR
EW
SO
NS
NO 12
ADA
MSO
N
LEIGHLAND
SOUTH SERVICEINDUSTRIAL
CROSS
SE
NE
CA
MIS
SIS
SA
GA
QUEENSWAY
PRINCE
GLEN LAWSON
HA
LL
JAMES
JAMES SNOW
NIN
TH
RE
GIO
NA
L R
OA
D 2
5
WIN
ST
ON
CH
UR
CH
ILL
EIG
HT
H
MA
IN
FO
UR
TH
HIG
HW
AY
403
EIG
HT
H
SIX
TH
NO 22
NO 20
EIG
HT
H
CAMPBELLVILLE
NORTH SERVICE
TE
NT
H
MA
PLE
FIR
ST
NIN
TH
TH
IRD
DU
BL
IN
NIN
TH
HIGHWAY 403
MA
IN
FIF
TH
PL
AIN
S
NO 17
NO 17
SIX
TH
FIF
TH
MIL
BU
RO
UG
H
BURNHAMTHORPE
GU
ELP
H
HIGHWAY 7
TH
IRD
TH
IRD
FO
UR
TH
NO 2
STEELES
UPPER MIDDLE
WA
LKE
R'S
FIF
TH
GU
ELP
H
NO 27
NO 2
FOURTH
LOWER BASE
SOUTH SERVICE
GUELPH
TH
IRD
NO 32
MA
IN
TR
AF
AL
GA
R
BRITAN NIA
BE
LL S
CH
OO
L
HIGHW
AY 407
BR
ON
TE
NO 22
NO 1
MA
IN
NA
SS
AG
AW
EY
A-P
US
CH
LIN
CH
NO 1
NO 3
BRITAN NIAF
IRS
T HIGHWAY 401
NO 3
EIG
HT
H
SIX
TH
MIL
BU
RO
UG
H
WIN
ST
ON
CH
UR
CH
ILL
FO
UR
TH
FO
UR
TH
TE
NT
H
NO 17
EIG
HT
H
BU
RL
OA
K
TE
NT
H
HIG
HW
AY
403
NO 10
NO 30
BRITAN NIA
B1
B1A
B2
B3
B4
O1
O2
O2A
O3
O4
M4L
G6L
M5G
M5L
G5G
G6G
A9G
B5
David PS
Kelso PS
Kelso WPP
Zone 4 ET
Moore Res
Kelso Well
Bailie Res
4th Line PS
Burloak WPP
Kitchen Res
Oakville WPP
Beaufort Res
McCraney Res
Washburn Res
Tyandaga Res
Main St. Res
Moore Park PS
Davidson Well
4th Line Well
Todd Rd Tower
Waterdown Res
Burlington WPP
Headon Rd. Res
Baillie (B-4) PS
Walker's Line PS
Davidson Well #2
Norval Standpipe
Appleby Line Res
8th Line (O-3) PS
Tyandaga (B-4) PS
Prospect Park WPP
Cedarvale Well #2
22nd Sideroad Res
Prospect Park Well
Walker's Line Well
Steeles Ave. Tower
Waterdown Standpipe
Burnhamthorpe Rd. Elevated T.
B1B B3A
B4A
B5A
B5B
G7G
Sustainable Halton
³
1:180,000July 2011
File: 60114062-202-W
Halton WaterFuture Pressure Zones
±Legend#* Existing Pumping Station
H Existing Well
!( Existing Standpipe
") Existing Reservoir
$+ Existing Water Purification Plant
^ Existing Elevated Tower
Existing Feedermain
Future Milton Groundwater Servicing
Future Milton Lake Base Servicing
Study Area Boundary
Future Pressure ZoneB1
B1A
B1B
B2
B3
B4
B5
B3A
B4A
B5A
B5B
O1
O2
O2A
O3
O4
M4L
M5G
M5L
G5G
G6G
G6L
G7G
A9G
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 25
Table 16. Water Demand Projections
Design criteria
Max Day Peak Factor (PF)
Lake Based and Milton GW
Peak Hour PF Lake Based
GT and Acton PFGroundwater
Lpcd Res 330 (314 with 5% reduction)
1.9 3 1.6
L/emp/d Industrial 302
Commercial 213
Institutional 72
POPULATION
AVERAGE DAY RESIDENTIAL DEMANDS (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY RESIDENTIAL DEMANDS (ML/D) PEAK HOUR RESIDENTIAL DEMANDS (ML/D)
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
B1 85,604 86,110 87,977 91,417 93,901 B1 23.21 23.36 23.95 25.03 25.81 B1 44.09 44.39 45.51 47.56 49.04 B1 69.62 70.09 71.85 75.09 77.43
B1A 10,907 11,105 11,411 11,379 11,604 B1A 2.93 3.00 3.09 3.08 3.15 B1A 5.57 5.69 5.88 5.86 5.99 B1A 8.80 8.99 9.28 9.25 9.46
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
1,164 1,714 2,188 2,172 2,169
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.30 0.48 0.62 0.62 0.62
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.58 0.90 1.19 1.18 1.18
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.91 1.43 1.87 1.86 1.86
B1B 149 150 149 145 143 B1B 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 B1B 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 B1B 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12
B2 19,504 19,620 19,902 19,939 20,400 B2 5.04 5.07 5.16 5.17 5.32 B2 9.57 9.64 9.81 9.83 10.10 B2 15.11 15.22 15.48 15.52 15.95
B3 50,504 50,876 51,445 51,429 52,460 B3 14.03 14.15 14.33 14.32 14.64 B3 26.66 26.88 27.22 27.21 27.82 B3 42.09 42.44 42.98 42.96 43.93
B4 9,563 9,617 9,701 9,677 9,879 B4 2.76 2.78 2.80 2.79 2.86 B4 5.24 5.27 5.32 5.31 5.43 B4 8.27 8.33 8.40 8.38 8.57
B5 303 300 294 288 284 B5 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 B5 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.16 B5 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.25
M4L 10,702 35,637 64,068 93,173 119,474 M4L 2.62 10.45 19.38 28.52 36.77 M4L 4.98 19.86 36.82 54.18 69.87 M4L 7.86 31.35 58.13 85.55 110.32
M5L 47,659 56,918 64,006 68,152 72,952 M5L 14.16 17.35 19.87 21.36 22.91 M5L 26.91 32.97 37.75 40.59 43.53 M5L 42.49 52.05 59.61 64.09 68.72
M5G 24,392 26,376 27,871 28,262 29,023 M5G 4.68 5.02 5.20 5.13 5.33 M5G 8.89 9.54 9.87 9.74 10.13 M5G 14.03 15.06 15.59 15.38 15.99
G6L 762 770 759 11,825 19,904 G6L 0.02 0.02 3.68 7.35 10.03 G6L 0.03 0.03 6.61 13.59 18.69 G6L 0.05 0.05 12.39 23.44 31.55
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
35,967 38,232 41,482 43,422 49,209
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
11.34 12.05 9.40 9.82 11.49
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
18.14 19.28 14.33 14.93 17.81
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
34.02 36.15 26.87 28.07 33.02
A9G 10,036 9,796 10,379 12,874 13,981 A9G 2.46 2.38 2.57 3.35 3.70 A9G 3.93 3.81 4.11 5.36 5.91 A9G 7.37 7.15 7.70 10.05 11.09
O1 54,513 55,624 57,959 59,988 62,343 O1 14.78 15.13 15.86 16.50 17.24 O1 28.08 28.74 30.13 31.35 32.75 O1 44.34 45.38 47.58 49.49 51.71
O2 20,062 22,068 26,684 30,878 34,471 O2 5.29 5.92 7.37 8.69 9.82 O2 10.06 11.26 14.01 16.51 18.66 O2 15.88 17.77 22.12 26.07 29.46
O2A 4,770 4,651 4,544 4,466 4,417 O2A 1.30 1.26 1.23 1.21 1.19 O2A 2.47 2.40 2.34 2.29 2.26 O2A 3.90 3.79 3.69 3.62 3.57
O3 70,612 72,196 72,199 72,011 73,964 O3 19.22 19.72 19.72 19.66 20.28 O3 36.53 37.47 37.47 37.36 38.53 O3 57.67 59.17 59.17 58.99 60.83
O4 17,175 35,472 52,647 58,866 63,079 O4 4.24 9.98 15.37 17.33 18.65 O4 8.05 18.97 29.21 32.92 35.44 O4 12.71 29.95 46.12 51.98 55.95
Rural 16,719 16,435 16,258 16,326 16,658 Rural 5.25 5.16 5.10 5.13 5.23 Rural 9.97 9.80 9.70 9.74 9.94 Rural 15.75 15.48 15.31 15.38 15.69
Glen
Williams 1,656 1,694 1,813 1,838 1,852
Glen
Williams 0.52 0.53 0.57 0.58 0.58
Glen
Williams0.99 1.01 1.08 1.10 1.10
Glen
Williams 1.56 1.60 1.71 1.73 1.74
Norval 323 345 356 367 367 Norval 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 Norval 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 Norval 0.30 0.33 0.33 0.35 0.35
Grand
Total 493,045 555,707 624,094 688,895 752,537
Grand
Total 134.38 154.05 175.53 195.87 215.86
Grand
Total 251.18 288.37 328.81 367.05 404.62
Grand
Total 403.13 462.16 526.58 587.62 647.57
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 26
INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES
AVERAGE DAY INDUSTRIAL DEMANDS (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY INDUSTRIAL DEMANDS (ML/D) PEAK HOUR INDUSTRIAL DEMAND (ML/D)
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
B1 7,552 8,658 8,691 8,836 9,424 B1 2.04 2.37 2.38 2.42 2.60 B1 3.87 4.50 4.52 4.60 4.94 B1 6.11 7.11 7.14 7.27 7.80
B1A 2,194 2,248 2,254 2,284 2,307 B1A 0.59 0.61 0.61 0.62 0.62 B1A 1.12 1.15 1.15 1.17 1.18 B1A 1.77 1.82 1.82 1.85 1.87
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0 0 0 0 0
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B1B 123 136 137 142 152 B1B 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 B1B 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 B1B 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.13
B2 22,432 22,603 22,887 23,030 23,130 B2 5.81 5.86 5.95 5.99 6.02 B2 11.04 11.14 11.30 11.39 11.44 B2 17.43 17.59 17.85 17.98 18.07
B3 4,604 4,769 4,858 4,955 5,069 B3 1.29 1.34 1.37 1.39 1.43 B3 2.45 2.54 2.59 2.65 2.71 B3 3.87 4.01 4.10 4.18 4.29
B4 78 85 88 97 99 B4 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 B4 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 B4 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08
B5 12 14 15 15 15 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
M4L 835 2,430 2,981 3,378 8,465 M4L 0.22 0.70 0.86 0.98 2.52 M4L 0.41 1.33 1.64 1.87 4.79 M4L 0.65 2.09 2.59 2.95 7.56
M5L 16,462 20,268 24,245 34,233 42,305 M5L 4.54 5.70 6.92 10.06 12.59 M5L 8.63 10.82 13.15 19.11 23.91 M5L 13.63 17.09 20.76 30.17 37.76
M5G 4,242 4,949 5,494 5,566 5,980 M5G 0.66 0.87 1.02 0.92 0.95 M5G 1.26 1.66 1.93 1.75 1.81 M5G 1.99 2.62 3.05 2.76 2.85
G6L 103 103 103 104 108 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.56 0.51 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.61 0.52 G6L 0.00 0.00 1.44 1.18 1.02
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
4,644 4,688 4,810 4,942 5,135
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
1.47 1.48 1.15 1.20 1.27
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
2.35 2.37 2.06 2.14 2.24
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
4.41 4.45 4.19 4.32 4.50
A9G 1,467 1,505 1,634 1,862 2,004 A9G 0.36 0.37 0.41 0.48 0.52 A9G 0.57 0.59 0.65 0.76 0.83 A9G 1.07 1.11 1.22 1.43 1.56
O1 4,893 4,977 5,719 5,776 6,002 O1 1.30 1.33 1.55 1.57 1.64 O1 2.47 2.52 2.95 2.98 3.11 O1 3.91 3.98 4.66 4.71 4.91
O2 26,037 27,027 27,062 27,115 28,014 O2 6.86 7.15 7.17 7.18 7.45 O2 13.03 13.59 13.61 13.64 14.16 O2 20.57 21.46 21.50 21.54 22.36
O2A 1,127 1,127 1,130 1,133 1,184 O2A 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 O2A 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.59 0.62 O2A 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.97
O3 7,633 11,741 15,000 15,003 15,133 O3 2.11 3.35 4.34 4.34 4.38 O3 4.02 6.37 8.24 8.24 8.32 O3 6.34 10.06 13.02 13.02 13.14
O4 91 860 4,138 4,811 5,275 O4 0.02 0.26 1.25 1.45 1.59 O4 0.04 0.49 2.37 2.75 3.02 O4 0.07 0.77 3.74 4.35 4.77
Rural 2,149 2,261 2,320 2,354 2,397 Rural 0.67 0.71 0.73 0.74 0.75 Rural 1.28 1.34 1.38 1.40 1.42 Rural 2.02 2.12 2.18 2.21 2.25
Glen
Williams 10 10 10 10 10
Glen
Williams 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Glen
Williams0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Glen
Williams 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Norval 33 33 33 33 33 Norval 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Norval 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Norval 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Grand
Total 106,721 120,492 133,608 145,681 162,240
Grand
Total 28.32 32.48 36.72 40.29 45.25
Grand
Total 53.3 61.2 69.1 75.8 85.2
Grand
Total 85.0 97.4 110.4 121.1 135.9
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 27
COMMERCIAL EMPLOYEES
AVERAGE DAY COMMERCIAL DEMAND (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY COMMERCIAL DEMAND (ML/D) PEAK HOUR COMMERCIAL DEMAND (ML/D)
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
B1 24,054 24,884 26,744 27,208 27,305 B1 6.28 6.45 6.85 6.95 6.97 B1 11.93 12.26 13.01 13.20 13.24 B1 18.83 19.36 20.55 20.85 20.91
B1A 3,347 3,475 3,554 3,584 3,657 B1A 0.89 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.96 B1A 1.69 1.74 1.77 1.79 1.82 B1A 2.67 2.75 2.80 2.82 2.87
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0 0 0 0 0
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B1B 31 32 33 33 34 B1B 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B1B 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 B1B 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
B2 19,374 19,795 20,406 20,547 20,866 B2 4.97 5.06 5.19 5.22 5.29 B2 9.44 9.61 9.86 9.92 10.05 B2 14.91 15.18 15.57 15.66 15.86
B3 6,808 7,209 7,962 8,109 8,546 B3 1.84 1.93 2.09 2.12 2.21 B3 3.50 3.66 3.97 4.03 4.21 B3 5.53 5.79 6.27 6.36 6.64
B4 454 489 507 517 522 B4 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 B4 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.27 B4 0.38 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.42
B5 0 0 0 0 0 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
M4L 336 2,466 5,968 9,538 15,658 M4L 0.07 0.53 1.27 2.03 3.34 M4L 0.14 1.00 2.42 3.86 6.34 M4L 0.22 1.58 3.82 6.10 10.01
M5L 12,208 18,219 24,947 28,020 31,955 M5L 3.06 4.38 5.88 6.53 7.38 M5L 5.81 8.33 11.16 12.40 14.02 M5L 9.17 13.15 17.63 19.58 22.14
M5G 4,199 5,684 7,114 7,824 8,019 M5G 0.73 1.00 1.25 1.40 1.43 M5G 1.39 1.90 2.37 2.67 2.72 M5G 2.20 3.01 3.75 4.21 4.29
G6L 58 58 58 920 1,294 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.87 0.92 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.86 1.11 1.18 G6L 0.00 0.00 1.61 2.00 2.10
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
5,216 5,287 5,487 5,617 6,054
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
1.64 1.66 1.28 1.29 1.37
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
2.63 2.65 2.30 2.32 2.46
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
4.93 4.98 4.69 4.75 5.01
A9G 1,260 1,490 1,618 1,751 1,861 A9G 0.31 0.35 0.38 0.41 0.43 A9G 0.49 0.57 0.61 0.66 0.69 A9G 0.92 1.06 1.14 1.23 1.30
O1 8,728 9,137 9,346 9,385 9,843 O1 2.37 2.46 2.51 2.51 2.61 O1 4.51 4.68 4.76 4.78 4.96 O1 7.12 7.38 7.52 7.54 7.84
O2 13,631 15,702 16,943 17,440 18,992 O2 3.47 3.91 4.18 4.28 4.62 O2 6.60 7.44 7.94 8.14 8.77 O2 10.42 11.74 12.54 12.85 13.85
O2A 282 282 282 282 282 O2A 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 O2A 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 O2A 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
O3 7,213 11,058 12,003 12,009 12,391 O3 1.94 2.76 2.96 2.96 3.04 O3 3.68 5.24 5.62 5.62 5.78 O3 5.81 8.27 8.87 8.88 9.12
O4 5,261 6,619 8,956 9,238 9,513 O4 1.19 1.48 1.98 2.04 2.10 O4 2.27 2.82 3.77 3.88 3.99 O4 3.58 4.45 5.94 6.12 6.30
Rural 1,168 1,244 1,269 1,322 1,427 Rural 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.42 Rural 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 0.79 Rural 1.08 1.13 1.15 1.18 1.25
Glen
Williams 18 18 18 18 20
Glen
Williams 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Glen
Williams0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Glen
Williams 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Norval 21 21 21 57 57 Norval 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Norval 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 Norval 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04
Grand
Total 113,667 133,170 153,236 163,420 178,296
Grand
Total 29.4 33.5 38.1 40.2 43.3
Grand
Total 55.2 63.1 71.6 75.6 81.5
Grand
Total 88.1 100.5 114.5 120.9 130.2
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 28
INSTITUTIONAL EMPLOYEES
AVERAGE DAY INSTITUTIONAL DEMAND (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY INSTITUTIONAL DEMAND (ML/D) PEAK HOUR INSTITUTIONAL DEMAND (ML/D)
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
B1 3,234 3,578 3,812 3,853 3,894 B1 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.82 0.83 B1 1.48 1.53 1.56 1.56 1.57 B1 2.33 2.41 2.46 2.47 2.48
B1A 581 619 726 746 747 B1A 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 B1A 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.26 B1A 0.38 0.39 0.41 0.41 0.41
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
25 27 29 29 29
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
B1B 0 0 0 0 0 B1B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B1B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B1B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
B2 724 754 752 759 760 B2 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 B2 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 B2 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.56 0.56
B3 491 509 514 515 516 B3 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 B3 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 B3 0.40 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41
B4 143 151 154 155 155 B4 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 B4 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 B4 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12
B5 0 0 0 0 0 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
M4L 357 1,201 2,158 6,012 7,171 M4L 0.05 0.11 0.18 0.46 0.54 M4L 0.10 0.21 0.35 0.87 1.03 M4L 0.16 0.34 0.55 1.38 1.63
M5L 3,738 4,852 6,344 6,764 7,173 M5L 0.97 1.04 1.14 1.16 1.19 M5L 1.85 1.97 2.17 2.21 2.26 M5L 2.92 3.11 3.42 3.49 3.56
M5G 2,117 2,887 3,803 4,664 4,728 M5G 0.41 0.48 0.55 0.62 0.63 M5G 0.77 0.91 1.04 1.17 1.19 M5G 1.22 1.44 1.65 1.85 1.88
G6L 29 29 29 363 557 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.34 0.32 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.39 0.36 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.73 0.68
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
2,709 2,709 2,711 2,738 2,872
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
0.85 0.85 0.64 0.65 0.67
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
1.36 1.36 1.15 1.16 1.19
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
2.55 2.55 2.34 2.36 2.39
A9G 1,064 1,090 1,102 1,131 1,206 A9G 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 A9G 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.42 A9G 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.78 0.79
O1 3,498 3,519 3,527 3,546 3,657 O1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 O1 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.81 1.82 O1 2.84 2.84 2.85 2.85 2.87
O2 1,842 2,039 2,277 2,348 2,575 O2 0.46 0.47 0.49 0.50 0.51 O2 0.88 0.90 0.93 0.94 0.98 O2 1.38 1.42 1.48 1.49 1.54
O2A 534 609 626 631 656 O2A 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 O2A 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 O2A 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.46
O3 5,734 6,046 6,788 6,845 7,165 O3 1.54 1.56 1.62 1.62 1.64 O3 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.08 3.12 O3 4.62 4.69 4.85 4.86 4.93
O4 3,194 3,659 4,911 4,914 4,958 O4 0.52 0.55 0.64 0.64 0.64 O4 0.98 1.05 1.22 1.22 1.23 O4 1.55 1.65 1.92 1.92 1.93
Rural 469 492 517 530 577 Rural 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Rural 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.29 Rural 0.43 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.45
Glen
Williams 23 23 23 25 25
Glen
Williams 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Glen
Williams0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Glen
Williams 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Norval 38 38 38 41 41 Norval 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Norval 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Norval 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
Grand
Total 30,544 34,831 40,839 46,610 49,463
Grand
Total 7.6 7.9 8.5 8.8 9.0
Grand
Total 14.1 14.7 15.7 16.4 16.7
Grand
Total 22.7 23.7 25.5 26.7 27.2
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 29
TOTAL EMPLOYEES
AVERAGE DAY TOTAL ICI DEMAND (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY TOTAL ICI DEMAND (ML/D) PEAK HOUR TOTAL ICI DEMAND (ML/D)
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
B1 34,839 37,120 39,246 39,898 40,622 B1 9.09 9.63 10.05 10.19 10.39 B1 17.27 18.29 19.09 19.37 19.75 B1 27.27 28.88 30.14 30.58 31.18
B1A 6,122 6,342 6,533 6,614 6,711 B1A 1.61 1.65 1.68 1.70 1.72 B1A 3.05 3.14 3.19 3.22 3.26 B1A 4.82 4.95 5.03 5.09 5.15
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
25 27 29 29 29
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
B1B 153 168 170 176 186 B1B 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 B1B 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 B1B 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.16
B2 42,530 43,152 44,044 44,337 44,756 B2 10.96 11.11 11.32 11.40 11.50 B2 20.83 21.10 21.51 21.65 21.84 B2 32.89 33.32 33.97 34.19 34.49
B3 11,903 12,486 13,335 13,580 14,131 B3 3.27 3.40 3.59 3.65 3.78 B3 6.21 6.47 6.82 6.94 7.18 B3 9.80 10.21 10.77 10.95 11.34
B4 676 726 749 769 776 B4 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 B4 0.36 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.40 B4 0.56 0.59 0.61 0.62 0.63
B5 12 14 15 15 15 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
M4L 1,529 6,098 11,107 18,928 31,295 M4L 0.34 1.34 2.32 3.48 6.40 M4L 0.65 2.54 4.41 6.61 12.16 M4L 1.03 4.01 6.96 10.43 19.20
M5L 32,408 43,338 55,536 69,017 81,434 M5L 8.57 11.12 13.93 17.75 21.15 M5L 16.29 21.12 26.48 33.72 40.19 M5L 25.72 33.35 41.80 53.24 63.46
M5G 10,558 13,520 16,411 18,054 18,727 M5G 1.80 2.36 2.81 2.94 3.01 M5G 3.43 4.48 5.35 5.59 5.72 M5G 5.41 7.07 8.44 8.82 9.03
G6L 190 190 190 1,387 1,959 G6L 0.00 0.00 1.73 1.77 1.75 G6L 0.00 0.00 2.05 2.11 2.06 G6L 0.00 0.00 3.84 3.91 3.79
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
12,569 12,684 13,008 13,297 14,061
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
3.96 3.99 2.34 2.58 2.86
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
6.34 6.39 4.47 4.91 5.41
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
11.89 11.98 8.37 9.14 10.02
A9G 3,791 4,085 4,354 4,744 5,071 A9G 0.92 0.98 1.05 1.15 1.22 A9G 1.47 1.57 1.67 1.83 1.95 A9G 2.75 2.94 3.14 3.44 3.65
O1 17,119 17,633 18,591 18,707 19,502 O1 4.62 4.74 5.01 5.03 5.21 O1 8.78 9.00 9.51 9.56 9.89 O1 13.87 14.21 15.02 15.10 15.62
O2 41,510 44,768 46,282 46,903 49,580 O2 10.79 11.54 11.84 11.96 12.58 O2 20.50 21.93 22.49 22.73 23.90 O2 32.37 34.63 35.51 35.89 37.74
O2A 1,943 2,018 2,038 2,046 2,122 O2A 0.53 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.55 O2A 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.05 O2A 1.59 1.60 1.61 1.61 1.66
O3 20,580 28,845 33,791 33,856 34,690 O3 5.59 7.67 8.91 8.92 9.06 O3 10.62 14.58 16.93 16.94 17.22 O3 16.77 23.02 26.74 26.75 27.19
O4 8,546 11,138 18,005 18,963 19,747 O4 1.74 2.29 3.87 4.13 4.33 O4 3.30 4.35 7.35 7.85 8.24 O4 5.21 6.87 11.61 12.40 13.00
Rural 3,786 3,997 4,107 4,206 4,400 Rural 1.18 1.23 1.26 1.28 1.32 Rural 2.24 2.34 2.39 2.43 2.50 Rural 3.54 3.69 3.77 3.83 3.95
Glen
Williams 51 51 51 53 55
Glen
Williams 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Glen
Williams0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Glen
Williams 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Norval 92 92 92 131 131 Norval 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 Norval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 Norval 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11
Grand
Total 250,932 288,493 327,684 355,710 390,000
Grand
Total 65.3 73.9 82.5 88.8 97.2
Grand
Total 122.5 138.9 155.3 167.1 182.9
Grand
Total 195.8 221.6 247.6 266.3 291.5
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 30
AVERAGE DAY TOTAL RESIDENTIAL & ICI DEMAND (ML/D)
MAXIMUM DAY TOTAL RESIDENTIAL & ICI DEMAND (ML/D) PEAK HOUR TOTAL RESIDENTIAL & ICI DEMAND (ML/D)
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Pressure Zone
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
B1 32.29 32.99 34.00 35.22 36.21 B1 61.36 62.68 64.60 66.93 68.79 B1 96.88 98.97 101.99 105.67 108.62
B1A 4.54 4.65 4.77 4.78 4.87 B1A 8.63 8.83 9.06 9.08 9.25 B1A 13.62 13.94 14.31 14.33 14.61
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.31 0.48 0.63 0.63 0.63
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.59 0.92 1.20 1.19 1.19
B3A,
B4A,
B5A
0.93 1.45 1.89 1.88 1.88
B1B 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 B1B 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.18 B1B 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.28
B2 16.00 16.18 16.48 16.57 16.81 B2 30.40 30.74 31.32 31.48 31.94 B2 48.00 48.54 49.45 49.71 50.44
B3 17.30 17.55 17.92 17.97 18.42 B3 32.86 33.34 34.04 34.15 35.00 B3 51.89 52.65 53.75 53.92 55.27
B4 2.95 2.97 3.00 3.00 3.07 B4 5.60 5.65 5.71 5.70 5.83 B4 8.84 8.92 9.01 9.01 9.20
B5 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 B5 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 B5 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.26
M4L 2.96 11.79 21.70 31.99 43.17 M4L 5.63 22.40 41.22 60.79 82.03 M4L 8.89 35.36 65.09 95.98 129.52
M5L 22.74 28.47 33.80 39.11 44.06 M5L 43.20 54.09 64.23 74.31 83.72 M5L 68.21 85.40 101.41 117.33 132.18
M5G 6.48 7.38 8.01 8.07 8.34 M5G 12.31 14.01 15.22 15.33 15.84 M5G 19.44 22.13 24.03 24.20 25.02
G6L 0.02 0.02 5.41 9.12 11.78 G6L 0.03 0.03 8.66 15.70 20.75 G6L 0.05 0.06 16.23 27.35 35.35
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
15.30 16.04 11.75 12.40 14.35
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
24.48 25.67 18.80 19.84 23.21
G5G,
G6G,
G7G
45.91 48.13 35.24 37.20 43.04
A9G 3.37 3.36 3.61 4.49 4.91 A9G 5.40 5.38 5.78 7.19 7.86 A9G 10.12 10.08 10.83 13.48 14.74
O1 19.40 19.86 20.87 21.53 22.44 O1 36.86 37.74 39.65 40.91 42.64 O1 58.21 59.59 62.60 64.59 67.33
O2 16.08 17.47 19.21 20.65 22.40 O2 30.56 33.19 36.50 39.24 42.56 O2 48.25 52.41 57.63 61.96 67.20
O2A 1.83 1.80 1.77 1.74 1.74 O2A 3.48 3.42 3.36 3.31 3.32 O2A 5.49 5.39 5.30 5.23 5.23
O3 24.82 27.39 28.63 28.58 29.34 O3 47.15 52.05 54.41 54.30 55.74 O3 74.45 82.18 85.90 85.74 88.02
O4 5.97 12.27 19.24 21.46 22.98 O4 11.35 23.32 36.56 40.77 43.67 O4 17.92 36.82 57.73 64.38 68.95
Rural 6.43 6.39 6.36 6.40 6.55 Rural 12.21 12.14 12.09 12.17 12.44 Rural 19.29 19.17 19.08 19.21 19.64
Glen
Williams 0.54 0.55 0.59 0.59 0.60
Glen
Williams 1.02 1.04 1.11 1.13 1.14
Glen
Williams1.61 1.64 1.76 1.78 1.79
Norval 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 Norval 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.29 0.29 Norval 0.39 0.41 0.42 0.46 0.46
Grand
Total 199.63 227.93 258.07 284.65 313.01
Grand
Total 373.70 427.25 484.11 534.14 587.57
Grand
Total 598.90 683.80 774.22 853.95 939.03
Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
29/07/2011
5 5
m m
ML MLML ML
ML MLML ML
ML ML
4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML
ML ML ML
236.22Equal. 2.84
Fire
Zone 4 ET Milton M4L
Milton ET
3.18
Fire 3.30
TWL 267.00
Equal. 9.40
Emerg.
1.38
TWL 236.22Equal. 1.41
Fire 3.30
Tyandaga. PS B-4
Required Pumping Capacity
236.221.40
2.05
0.09
Equal.
Burlington Water Distribution System
0.28 ML/D
Beaufort PS B-5
Required Pumping Capacity
Firm Capacity 1.00Installed Capacity 3.70
3.30
Beaufort ResTWL
Total
Existing Storage
FireEmerg.
TWL
5.88
Existing Storage
Total
Firm Capacity
4th Line M5L Pumps
Required Pumping Capacity
0.00 ML/D
0.00
5.68
Total 6.92
Existing Storage
Emerg. Emerg. 1.18Empl. Force303121.17
Max.Day (ML/D)
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.28
5.87
-----
Pressure Zone
B-5100.0%
2.70
Installed Capacity
B5
0.0%0.00
M-5L
June 2011 Planning DataJune 2011 Planning Data
6.83
15.88
0.28
0.18
292.22
Res. PopulationMilton Transfer M5T
Res. Population 5.58
Emerg. 3.18Total 9.05
Existing Storage
Milton Z5 Res
TWL 267.00
Equal. 9.40Fire 3.30
Existing Storage
Oakville Water Distribution System
2011 2011
Total
2011SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
M5L 30%HGL
3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML
m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML
ML
HGL
2mMLMLMLML
HGL ML
HGL
O3 0%
2 2m m
HGL ML MLML MLML ML
ML ML
ML ML
236.00
Required Pumping Capacity 43.73
Installed Capacity
NO M4L Pumps
Equal.
Total
Installed Capacity
0.00
18.86
Res. Population
11.79
0.00
0.00
M-4L/O-4
0.00 ML/D
Eighth Line Res
26.80
100.0%
16.98
3.77
64.45
Required Pumping Capacity
167.64
Existing Storage7.67
Eighth Line BPS O-3
Required Pumping Capacity
22.34 ML/D
28.2960.0%
O-3
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
65,356
0.00
Installed Capacity
50,504
100.00
0.00
0.00
100.0%
TWL 167.70
Pressure Zone277.67
100.0%0.59
B2, B3A, B5A
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
B2, B3A, B5A
0Max.Day (ML/D)
Res. Population 1,164Empl. Force
0.93
0.59
Waterdown ET Fire
B-4
TWL 277.67Equal. 0.15
3.30Emerg. 0.86Total 4.31
Fire
Emerg.
Existing Storage 2.0
O4
Eighth Line PS O-4
0.00
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 17,175Empl. Force 91
1814.39
Empl. Force 236.22M-5L
Existing Storage
11.35
Res. Population
Max.Day (ML/D)
17.9216.98
Pressure ZoneMax.Day (ML/D)
0.0% Peak Hr. (ML/D)
Firm Capacity
Appleby Res
-----
Appleby PS - B-3
0.00
Emerg. 2.73
0.93
203.308.22Equal.
8.84
B4
ML/D
4.55
Peak Hr. (ML/D)Max.Day (ML/D)
Empl. ForceTotal
Tyandaga Res
2.8814.39
0.84
Res. Population
TWL
9,563
236.22
785.60
Fire 3.30Equal. 8.22
2.88
Max.Day (ML/D)
4,604
32.86
Res. Population
Empl. Force
Existing Storage
Equal.TWL 167.93
Total 13.63
7.60B3
Existing Storage 17.5
Total
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 51.89
Max.Day (ML/D)
O-3
Firm CapacityInstalled Capacity 80.16
55.16
2.84
198.03
Fire 3.30
0.00
1.53
16.98
ML/D
-----
Empl. Force 03.48
43.20 ML/D
M-4L/O-4
74.450.00
Firm Capacity 0.00Installed Capacity
5.63
Pressure Zone
47.15
Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps
Required Pumping Capacity
75.00
18.86
Firm Capacity32Installed Capacity Installed Capacity
Firm Capacity 1.96Installed Capacity 5.26
Pressure Zone
B-415.0%
200.20Pressure Zone
Existing Storage
3.30
Bailey Res
Equal.
Headon ResTWL 200.20
4.76
85.0%
ML/D
Moore Res
32
14.39
Emerg.
19.19
Emerg.
0.09
40.0%
M5L
92616.98
Pressure Zone O3
105.00
Required Pumping Capacity
Bailie PS B-4
4.859.20
2.88
Required Pumping Capacity
3.30
Firm Capacity
Existing Storage
Fire
Total
Firm Capacity
17.6
TWL
16,462
8.89
0.00Res. Population 27,877M-4L & O-4Combined Pressure Zone
198.03Equal.
Emerg.
0.00 ML/D
8.223.30
M4L
Max.Day (ML/D)
Total
Max.Day (ML/D)
10,702
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
236.00
Emerg.
37.62
43.20
28.29
Empl. Force
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
Res. PopulationEmpl. Force 835
59.40
Pressure ZoneRes. Population
TWL
267.00
Kitchen O3 Pumps
Required Pumping Capacity
ML/D
Firm Capacity 75.00
Fire
47,659
1 HGLmML
B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL
1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 38%ML ML
Firm Capacity 102.26154.28
Required Pumping Capacity
69.88
Pressure Zone
26,037
ML/D
Davis Rd O-2
4.22
0.00
4.85
0.00
B-294.0%
B-2
Empl. Force
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
B-1A
13.62
Brant St. PS B-3
Required Pumping Capacity
136.50
Firm Capacity 0.00
Installed Capacity
36.34
ML/D
59.33
Existing StorageTotal
Waterdown PS
Required Pumping Capacity
ML/D
Installed Capacity
Waterdown ResTWL
Emerg.
4.58
Fire
7.5 Max.Day (ML/D) 8.63
Equal.140.21
0.59Firm Capacity 2.29
B-30.0%
B-30.93
3.29
10.0%
1.36
2.16
6.82Res. Population
Total
Pressure Zone B1A140.21
Fire3.30Equal.
Existing Storage10,9072,194
Pressure Zone O2A
100.0%3.48
O-2A3.481,127
3.48
5.49Max.Day (ML/D)
Empl. Force39.31
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
180.00
Res. Population 4,770
O-2
O2
2.74
Fire
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
17
Res. Population
Existing Storage
0.00
O-2
TotalTWL
Max.Day (ML/D)
13.68
7.64
TWLKitchen Res
0.00
9.22
128.016
135.00
Emerg.
ML/D
19,504Res. Population
1.82 FireEmerg.Total
ML/D
22,432Empl. Force
B2
B-2
Required Pumping Capacity
Kingsway BPS
Existing Storage
9.21
Installed CapacityFirm Capacity
Installed Capacity14.21
135.03
2.7313.63Total
Emerg.
0.59
46.00
Brant St Res
100.0%
28.58
Fire 3.30Equal.
11.5
30.00
ML/D
13.62
3.96
0.00
0.00
15.34135.03
Washburn ResTWL
13.5
3.30
23.30Existing Storage
4.66
Firm Capacity 0.00
0.00
Valve
Empl. Force30.56
167.04
109.20
ML/D
8.81
Firm Capacity
Installed Capacity
Required Pumping Capacity
Equal.
Washburn PS B-2
Pressure Zone
6.0%
37.38 29.58
0.00
B-390.0%
29.58
0.0%
167.707.60
TWL
6.48
21.45
69.87
53.72Empl. Force
135.03Pressure Zone
Max.Day (ML/D)
16.15
Installed Capacity
Installed Capacity
B-2 BPS
Required Pumping Capacity
Firm Capacity
-----
0.0%
0.00
100.0%
Washburn PS B-3
Required Pumping Capacity
3.30
71.49
4015.643.13
Equal.
0.00
20,062
48.25
30.56
36.86
54,513O1
4,893
3.30
Res. Population37.6050.04
Emerg.McCraney Res
45%
55%
HGL
m
HGL MLML
MLMLML
####
96.8861.36
85,604Res. Population7,552
135.03Pressure Zone
106.40
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
66.96
3.30
Required Pumping Capacity
,p
179.22263.0
0.25
B-1B
Empl. Force
Max.Day (ML/D)
B-1100.0%61.36
Emerg.
Mount Forest Res
Peak Hr. (ML/D)
0.25
Max.Day (ML/D) 0.16
Pressure Zone Fire
Empl. Force 123149
Total
Burlington WPP
Res. Population
B1B
4.66
Firm Capacity126.64
9.37
g g
Equal.
126.64
Firm Capacity 2.31Installed Capacity
TWL
7.55
100.0%
30.4048.00
0.16
Max.Day (ML/D)Peak Hr. (ML/D)
117.85
11.45
Burloak WPP
55.00
g g
Installed Capacity 343.7
ML/D
Firm Capacity
39.44
B1
2.08
Required Pumping Capacity
Burlington WPP
5.6Existing Storage23.30
2.08 ML/D
4.21
15.34
Mount Forest PS
y ( )
Criteria Dropped by:
Required Pumping Capacity
90.59 ML/D
Firm Capacity 109.00152.73Installed Capacity
58.21
100.0%36.86
O-1
Oakville WPP
Oakville WPP
Installed Capacity -----
Required Pumping Capacity
Peak Hr. (ML/D)50.04
48.2 ML/D
Burloak WPP
48.20
2011SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
Figure 6.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2011
Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
29/07/2011
5 5
m m
ML MLML ML
ML MLML ML
ML ML
4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML
ML ML ML
0.09 M-5L Installed Capacity -----Tyandaga. PS B-4 5.0%
Firm Capacity 30.00
Required Pumping Capacity 8.57
ML/D Existing Storage 5.68 Existing Storage 30.00
Total 5.89 Max.Day (ML/D) 0.18 Res. Population 6.18 Required Pumping Capacity
Existing Storage 4.55 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.28 8.58
Total 10.66 Total 11.12
Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.18 Empl. Force 14 Milton Transfer M5T 4th Line M5L Pumps Emerg.
Fire 3.30 Res. Population 300 Fire 2.702.13 Emerg. 2.22
Equal. 1.41 Pressure Zone B5 Equal. 5.83 Equal. 5.60
0.28Beaufort Res Zone 4 ET Milton M4L
TWL 236.22 292.22 TWL 236.22 TWL 236.22
0.28 ML/D
Firm Capacity 8.80 B-5Installed Capacity ----- 100.0%
Existing Storage 6.83 Existing Storage 20.00
Beaufort PS B-5
Required Pumping Capacity
Emerg. 3.82 Emerg. 3.82Total 19.10 Total 12.27
Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30
Milton ET Milton Z5 Res
TWL 267.00 TWL 267.00
Burlington Water Distribution System Oakville Water Distribution System
2016 2016
June 2011 Planning Data June 2011 Planning Data
Equal. 11.98 Equal. 11.98
2016SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
M5L 30%HGL
3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML
m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML
ML
HGL
m
MLMLML 2ML mML ML
MLMLML
HGL ML
HGL
O3 48%
2 2m m
HGL ML MLML MLML ML
ML ML
ML MLPeak Hr. (ML/D) 52.65 Installed Capacity 105.00 Installed Capacity 100.00 Installed Capacity 80.16
32 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity
ML/D 29.45 ML/D
Max.Day (ML/D) 33.34 Existing Storage 17.50 Existing Storage 55.16
Empl. Force 4,769 Total 14.55 Total 13.73 45.52 ML/D 35.68
26.02 Eighth Line BPS O-3
Res. Population 50,876 Emerg. 2.91 Emerg. 2.75 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Pressure Zone B3 Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps Kitchen O3 Pumps 26.02
0.92 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 82.18Bailie Res Appleby Res 9.65
O-3 O-3200.20 Equal. 8.34 Equal. 7.69 50.0%
TWL 167.93 TWL 167.7050.0%
100.0% 32.93 Max.Day (ML/D) 52.05B2, B3A, B5A Installed Capacity 19.19 Installed Capacity ----- Empl. Force
Firm Capacity 9.20 Firm Capacity 30.00 Res. Population 67,016 3.424,108 11.72
198.03
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 1.45 4.89 ML/D 29.60 ML/D Pressure Zone O3
Appleby PS - B-3 42.57Max.Day (ML/D) 0.92 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Pressure Zone B2, B3A, B5A
Res. Population 1,714Empl. Force 0 Bailie PS B-4
0.09 Total 11.41277.67 22.93 Existing Storage 17.6
Equal. 5.83Fire 3.30
Emerg. 2.28
Max.Day (ML/D) 22.40 Eighth Line ResPeak Hr. (ML/D) 35.36 TWL 167.64
4.80 Res. Population 35,637 Firm Capacity 100.00Empl. Force 2,430 Installed Capacity 125.00
43.73
85.0% Pressure Zone M4L 42.58 ML/D Installed Capacity 64.45
B-4 236.00 Required Pumping Capacity 36.57 9.14 Firm Capacity
Existing Storage 2.0 NO M4L Pumps 80.0% 20.0% 11.72 ML/D Peak Hr. (ML/D) 36.82
Total 4.41 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 8.92 M-4L/O-4 M-4L/O-4 Required Pumping Capacity Max.Day (ML/D) 23.32
72.18 Res. Population 35,472Emerg. 0.88 Max.Day (ML/D) 5.65 45.52 Eighth Line PS O-4
Existing Storage 18 95.0% Existing Storage 32 Peak Hr. (ML/D)Empl. Force 860
Fire 3.30 Existing Storage 9.05 Empl. Force 859,617 Total 14.55
Empl. Force 3,290 236.22Equal. 0.23 Total 14.55 Res. Population Max.Day (ML/D) 45.72 Pressure Zone O4M-5L Total 20.39
Waterdown ET Fire 3.30 236.22 Fire 3.30 2.57TWL 277.67 Emerg. 2.91 Pressure Zone B4 Emerg. 2.91 Emerg.
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 75.65 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 71,1094.08 6.00
20,268 TWL 198.03 236.00Equal. 8.34 Equal. 8.34 Max.Day (ML/D) 47.91TWL 203.30 0.85 TWL 200.20 Empl. Force
Equal. 13.01 Combined Pressure Zone M-4L & O-4
2.57 0.00Tyandaga Res 15.0% Headon Res Res. Population 56,918 Moore Res
Installed Capacity 5.26 267.00B-4 Pressure Zone M5L
Firm Capacity 1.96
0.94 ML/D 8.57
Total 4.41Existing Storage 4.5
North Aldershot Res
TWL
Equal. 0.23Fire 3.30
Emerg. 0.88
1 HGLmML
B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL
1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 45%ML ML Max.Day (ML/D) 37.74 80.27Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 22,603 Existing Storage 27.00
Total 13.73 Res. Population 19,620 Total 23.71 Empl. Force 4,977
Pressure Zone O1Emerg. 2.75 Pressure Zone B2 Emerg. 4.74 56.84 11.74
Fire 3.30 1.23 167.70 Fire 3.30Res. Population 55,624
Equal. 7.69 4.0% Equal. 15.67 135.03TWL 135.03 B-2 TWL 135.03 22.84
71.0% 25.0% 24.36 -12.629.75 Brant St Res 21.83 7.69 Washburn Res
Firm Capacity 30.00Installed Capacity 46.00
B-2 B-2
Installed Capacity 92.00 Installed Capacity ----- 67.65
Firm Capacity 50.00 6.69
14.86 ML/D Installed Capacity 13.08 Installed Capacity 145.60
ML/D 22.85 ML/D
Required Pumping Capacity Firm Capacity 6.60 Firm Capacity 109.20 Firm Capacity 60.00
Kingsway BPS 4.27 ML/D 50.76 ML/D 33.34
154.2813.94 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
100.0% Brant St. PS B-3 Washburn PS B-2 Washburn PS B-3 B-2 BPS Installed Capacity
2.91 O-2 O-2
67.66 ML/D
B-1A Firm Capacity 102.26
28.94 8.48 2.99 30.20 Required Pumping Capacity
10.00 81.20 9.0% 91.0% Davis Rd O-2
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 52.41
Res. Population 22,068Empl. Force 27,027
Max.Day (ML/D) 33.19
0.92
167.04Peak Hr. (ML/D) 13.94 21.12 Pressure Zone O2
Existing Storage 7.5 Max.Day (ML/D) 8.83 Existing Storage 17
ValveTotal 6.88 Empl. Force 2,248 Total 14.50
Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.38 Res. Population 11,105 Emerg. 2.90
8.30 3.42 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 5.39Fire 3.30 Pressure Zone B1A Existing Storage 40
Equal. 2.21 140.21 Total 15.92 Equal.
1,127TWL 140.21 Emerg. 3.18 TWL 128.016 100.0% Max.Day (ML/D) 3.42Waterdown Res Fire 3.30 McCraney Res O-2A Empl. Force
180.00TWL 135.00 Pressure Zone O2A
Equal. 9.44 41.16 Res. Population 4,651
Firm Capacity 4.79 3.42Installed Capacity ----- Kitchen Res
4.89 29.60
0.92 ML/D 3.33 23.34 6.67
Waterdown PS B-3 B-3 B-3Required Pumping Capacity 0.94 10.0% 70.0% 20.0%
46%
54%
HGL
m
HGL MLML
MLMLML
####Criteria Dropped by:
Burloak WPP Oakville WPP
2.58
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27
Burlington WPP
Empl. Force 136 Total 23.71Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Existing Storage 11.00
Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity 152.73
Res. Population 150 Emerg. 4.74
Pressure Zone B1B Fire 3.30 Installed Capacity 343.75 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 98.9762.68
ML/D 118.02 ML/D
126.64 Equal. 15.67 Firm Capacity 263.00 Max.Day (ML/D) Firm Capacity 130.00Firm Capacity 55.00
TWL 126.64 201.34 ML/D Empl. Force 8,658 49.4
Burloak WPP Oakville WPP
0.27 Mount Forest Res Required Pumping Capacity 62.68 Res. Population 86,110100.0% 9.92 Burlington WPP 100.0% Pressure Zone B1
Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Installed Capacity 7.55 138.66B-1B B-1 135.03
Required Pumping Capacity
0.17 2.59 ML/D
Firm Capacity 2.31
O-1100.0%
Mount Forest PS 12.50 126.16 42.05 37.74
49.37
4.27 84.11
y ( )Max.Day (ML/D) 30.74 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 59.59
g g p , g g
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 48.54 79.68
2016SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
Figure 7.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2016
Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
29/07/2011
5 5 6
m m m HGL
ML ML ML
ML ML ML
ML ML MLML ML ML
ML ML ML
4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML
ML ML ML
0.09 M-5L Installed Capacity
Existing Storage 30.00
Firm Capacity 30.00
Required Pumping Capacity 12.61
Existing Storage 4.55 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27 12.62 ML/D Existing Storage
----Tyandaga. PS B-4 10.0%
Emerg. 3.40Total 5.91 Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Res. Population 6.88 Required Pumping Capacity Total 14.80 Total 17.01
Emerg. 1.18 Empl. Force 15 Milton Transfer M5T 4th Line M5L Pumps Emerg. 2.96
Equal. 10.31Fire 3.30 Res. Population 294 Fire 2.70 Fire
Equal. 1.43 Pressure Zone B5 Equal.3.30
Milton M4LTWL 236.22 292.22 TWL 236.22 TWL 236.22
Installed Capacity ---- 100.0%0.27
Beaufort Res Zone 4 ET
20.00
Firm Capacity 8.80 B-5 Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity -----
0.28 ML/D 6.88 Firm Capacity 0.00 Firm Capacity
6.89 ML/D 8.67 ML/D
G-6L100.0%
8.665th Sideroad 5L PS 5th Sideroad 6L PS
Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
8.66
Existing Storage 6.83 Existing Storage 20.00 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 16.23
Total 22.05 Total 15.22 Max.Day (ML/D)
296
Equal. 14.34 Equal. 14.34 Pressure Zone
Emerg. 4.41 Emerg. 4.41 Empl. Force 103
G6L
Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 796
2021 2021
June 2011 Planning Data June 2011 Planning Data
Milton ET Milton Z5 Res
Burlington Water Distribution System Oakville Water Distribution System
TWL 267.00 TWL 267.00
Georgetown 6L Res
TWL 296.00
Equal. 2.17
Fire 3.30
Emerg. 1.37Total 6.83
Existing Storage 0.00
Required Pumping Capacity 12.0%
Beaufort PS B-5 M-5L
9.14
5.68
2021SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
Figure 8.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2021
M5L 30%HGL
3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML
m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML
ML
HGL
m
MLMLML 2ML mML ML
MLMLML
HGL ML
HGL
O3 30%
2 2m m
HGL ML MLML MLML ML
ML ML
ML MLPeak Hr. (ML/D) 53.75 Installed Capacity 105.00 Installed Capacity 100.00 Installed Capacity 80.16
32 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity
ML/D 46.89 ML/D
Max.Day (ML/D) 34.04 Existing Storage 17.50 Existing Storage 55.16
Empl. Force 4,858 Total 14.76 Total 13.91 44.73 ML/D 60.63
43.52 Eighth Line BPS O-3
Res. Population 51,445 Emerg. 2.95 Emerg. 2.78 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Pressure Zone B3 Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps Kitchen O3 Pumps 10.88
1.20 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 85.90Bailie Res Appleby Res 49.74
O-3 O-3200.20 Equal. 8.51 Equal. 7.83 20.0%
TWL 167.93 TWL 167.7080.0%
100.0% 25.98 Max.Day (ML/D) 54.41B2, B3A, B5A Installed Capacity 19.19 Installed Capacity ----- Empl. Force
Firm Capacity 9.20 Firm Capacity 30.00 Res. Population 67,101 3.367,367 30.23
198.03
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 1.89 4.94 ML/D 22.80 ML/D Pressure Zone O3
Appleby PS - B-3 75.73Max.Day (ML/D) 1.20 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Pressure Zone B2, B3A, B5A
Res. Population 2,188Empl. Force 0 Bailie PS B-4
0.09 Total 15.55277.67 15.98 Existing Storage 17.6
Equal. 9.14Fire 3.30
Emerg. 3.11
Max.Day (ML/D) 41.22 Eighth Line ResPeak Hr. (ML/D) 65.09 TWL 167.64
4.85 Res. Population 64,068 Firm Capacity 100.00Empl. Force 2,981 Installed Capacity 125.00
43.73
85.0% Pressure Zone M4L 75.73 ML/D Installed Capacity 64.45
B-4 236.00 Required Pumping Capacity 66.90 10.89 Firm Capacity
Existing Storage 2.0 NO M4L Pumps 86.0% 14.0% 30.24 ML/D Peak Hr. (ML/D) 57.73
Total 4.50 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 9.01 M-4L/O-4 M-4L/O-4 Required Pumping Capacity Max.Day (ML/D) 36.56
122.82 Res. Population 52,647Emerg. 0.90 Max.Day (ML/D) 5.71 44.73 Eighth Line PS O-4
Existing Storage 18 78.0% Existing Storage 32 Peak Hr. (ML/D)Empl. Force 4,138
Fire 3.30 Existing Storage 9.05 Empl. Force 889,701 Total 14.76
Empl. Force 7,119 236.22Equal. 0.30 Total 14.76 Res. Population Max.Day (ML/D) 77.79 Pressure Zone O4M-5L Total 21.13
Waterdown ET Fire 3.30 236.22 Fire 3.30 19.34TWL 277.67 Emerg. 2.95 Pressure Zone B4 Emerg. 2.95 Emerg.
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 90.55 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 116,7164.23 8.83
24,245 TWL 198.03 236.00Equal. 8.51 Equal. 8.51 Max.Day (ML/D) 57.35TWL 203.30 0.86 TWL 200.20 Empl. Force
Equal. 13.60 Combined Pressure Zone M-4L & O-4
1.96
3.78 15.56Tyandaga Res 15.0% Headon Res Res. Population 64,006 Moore Res
Installed Capacity 5.26 267.00B-4 Pressure Zone M5L
q p g p y
0.95 ML/D 12.61
North Aldershot Res
TWL
Equal. 0.30Fire 3.30
Emerg. 0.90Total 4.50
Existing Storage 4.5
Firm Capacity
1 HGLmML
B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL
1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 31%ML ML
Res. Population 57,959
154.28Installed Capacity
Max.Day (ML/D) 39.65 76.64Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 22,887 Existing Storage 27.00Total 13.91 Res. Population 19,902 Total 24.31 Empl. Force 5,719
Pressure Zone O1Emerg. 2.78 Pressure Zone B2 Emerg. 4.86 73.75 54.95
Fire 3.30 1.25 167.70 Fire 3.30Equal. 7.83 4.0% Equal. 16.15 135.03TWL 135.03 B-2 TWL 135.03 28.25
71.0% 25.0% 31.61 23.3410.26 Brant St Res 22.24 7.83 Washburn Res
Firm Capacity 30.00Installed Capacity 46.00
B-2 B-2
Installed Capacity 92.00 Installed Capacity ----- 99.98
Firm Capacity 50.00 13.63
15.51 ML/D Installed Capacity 13.08 Installed Capacity 136.50
ML/D 28.26 ML/D
Required Pumping Capacity Firm Capacity 6.60 Firm Capacity 109.20 Firm Capacity 60.00
Kingsway BPS 4.35 ML/D 46.45 ML/D 33.83
14.31 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
100.0% Brant St. PS B-3 Washburn PS B-2 Washburn PS B-3 B-2 BPS
3.26 O-2 O-2
99.99 ML/D
B-1A Firm Capacity 102.26
24.21 6.79 4.38 32.12 Required Pumping Capacity
10.00 105.36 12.0% 88.0% Davis Rd O-2
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 57.63
Res. Population 26,684Empl. Force 27,062
Max.Day (ML/D) 36.50
1.20
167.04Peak Hr. (ML/D) 14.31 16.01 Pressure Zone O2
Existing Storage 15.00 Max.Day (ML/D) 9.06 Existing Storage 17
ValveTotal 6.96 Empl. Force 2,254 Total 15.53
Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.39 Res. Population 11,411 Emerg. 3.11
9.12 3.36 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 5.30Fire 3.30 Pressure Zone B1A Existing Storage 40
Equal. 2.27 140.21 Total 16.51 Equal.
1,130TWL 140.21 Emerg. 3.30 TWL 128.016 100.0% Max.Day (ML/D) 3.36Waterdown Res Fire 3.30 McCraney Res O-2A Empl. Force
180.00TWL 135.00 Pressure Zone O2A
Equal. 9.91 77.11 Res. Population 4,544
Firm Capacity 4.79 3.36Installed Capacity ----- Kitchen Res
4.94 22.80
1.20 ML/D 3.40 23.83 6.81
Waterdown PS B-3 B-3 B-3Required Pumping Capacity 0.94 10.0% 70.0% 20.0%
ML ML
17%
83%
HGL
m
HGL MLML
MLMLML
####Criteria Dropped by:
Burloak WPP Oakville WPP
Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity 152.73
130.27
2.34
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27
Burlington WPP
Empl. Force 137 Total 24.31Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Existing Storage 11.00
Res. Population 149 Emerg. 4.86
Firm Capacity 130.00Pressure Zone B1B Fire 3.30 Installed Capacity 343.75 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 101.99
64.60 Firm Capacity 165.00126.64 Equal. 16.15 Firm Capacity 263.00 Max.Day (ML/D)
130.3 ML/D 116.29 ML/DTWL 126.64 184.33 ML/D Empl. Force 8,691
Oakville WPP
0.27 Mount Forest Res Required Pumping Capacity 64.60 Res. Population 87,977 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
100.0% 10.43 Burlington WPP 100.0% Pressure Zone B1 Burloak WPP
Installed Capacity 7.55 119.73B-1B B-1 135.03
Required Pumping Capacity
0.17 2.34 ML/D
Firm Capacity 2.31
O-1100.0%
Mount Forest PS 12.77 106.96 26.68 39.65
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 49.45 102.004.35 80.28
Max.Day (ML/D) 39.65 76.64Max.Day (ML/D) 31.32 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 62.60
Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 22,887 Existing Storage 27.00
2021SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
Figure 8.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2021
Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
29/07/2011
5 5 6
m m m HGL
ML ML ML
ML ML ML
ML ML MLML ML ML
ML ML ML
4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML
ML ML ML
0.08 M-5L Installed Capacity
Existing Storage 50.00
Firm Capacity 30.00
Required Pumping Capacity 14.14
Existing Storage 4.55 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27 14.14 ML/D Existing Storage
----Tyandaga. PS B-4 10.0%
Emerg. 4.62Total 5.91 Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Res. Population 7.45 Required Pumping Capacity Total 16.12 Total 23.12
Emerg. 1.18 Empl. Force 15 Milton Transfer M5T 4th Line M5L Pumps Emerg. 3.22
Equal. 15.20Fire 3.30 Res. Population 288 Fire 2.70 Fire
Equal. 1.43 Pressure Zone B5 Equal.3.30
Milton M4LTWL 236.22 292.22 TWL 236.22 TWL 236.22
Installed Capacity ----- 100.0%0.27
Beaufort Res Zone 4 ET
20.00
Firm Capacity 8.80 B-5 Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity -----
0.27 ML/D 8.02 Firm Capacity 20.00 Firm Capacity
8.03 ML/D 15.70 ML/D
G-6L100.0%
15.695th Sideroad 5L PS 5th Sideroad 6L PS
Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
15.69
Existing Storage 6.83 Existing Storage 30.00 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 27.34
Total 25.02 Total 18.19 Max.Day (ML/D)
296
Equal. 16.71 Equal. 16.71 Pressure Zone
Emerg. 5.00 Emerg. 5.00 Empl. Force 104
G6L
Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 11,869
2026 2026
June 2011 Planning Data June 2011 Planning Data
Milton ET Milton Z5 Res
Burlington Water Distribution System Oakville Water Distribution System
TWL 267.00 TWL 267.00
Georgetown 6L Res
TWL 296.00
Equal. 3.92
Fire 3.30
Emerg. 1.81Total 9.03
Existing Storage 20.00
Required Pumping Capacity 12.0%
Beaufort PS B-5 M-5L
10.19
5.68
2026SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
Figure 9.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2026
M5L 30%HGL
3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML
m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML
ML
HGL
m
MLMLML 2ML mML ML
MLMLML
HGL ML
HGL
O3 31%
2 2m m
HGL ML MLML MLML ML
ML ML
ML MLPeak Hr. (ML/D) 53.92 Installed Capacity 105.00 Installed Capacity 100.00 Installed Capacity 80.16
32 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity
ML/D 46.76 ML/D
Max.Day (ML/D) 34.15 Existing Storage 17.50 Existing Storage 55.16
Empl. Force 4,955 Total 14.80 Total 13.96 52.15 ML/D 74.59
43.44 Eighth Line BPS O-3
Res. Population 51,429 Emerg. 2.96 Emerg. 2.79 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Pressure Zone B3 Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps Kitchen O3 Pumps 10.86
1.19 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 85.74Bailie Res Appleby Res 63.73
O-3 O-3200.20 Equal. 8.54 Equal. 7.87 20.0%
TWL 167.93 TWL 167.7080.0%
100.0% 33.51 Max.Day (ML/D) 54.30B2, B3A, B5A Installed Capacity 19.19 Installed Capacity ----- Empl. Force
Firm Capacity 9.20 Firm Capacity 30.00 Res. Population 66,977 3.317,370 42.19
198.03
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 1.88 4.94 ML/D 30.34 ML/D Pressure Zone O3
Appleby PS - B-3 97.24Max.Day (ML/D) 1.19 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Pressure Zone B2, B3A, B5A
Res. Population 2,172Empl. Force 0 Bailie PS B-4
0.08 Total 16.87277.67 23.51 Existing Storage 17.6
Equal. 10.19Fire 3.30
Emerg. 3.37
Max.Day (ML/D) 60.79 Eighth Line ResPeak Hr. (ML/D) 95.98 TWL 167.64
4.85 Res. Population 93,173 Firm Capacity 140.00Empl. Force 3,378 Installed Capacity -----
43.73
85.0% Pressure Zone M4L 97.24 ML/D Installed Capacity 64.45
B-4 236.00 Required Pumping Capacity 87.34 14.22 Firm Capacity
Existing Storage 2.0 NO M4L Pumps 86.0% 14.0% 42.19 ML/D Peak Hr. (ML/D) 64.38
Total 4.50 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 9.01 M-4L/O-4 M-4L/O-4 Required Pumping Capacity Max.Day (ML/D) 40.77
160.36 Res. Population 58,866Emerg. 0.90 Max.Day (ML/D) 5.70 52.15 Eighth Line PS O-4
Existing Storage 18 78.0% Existing Storage 32 Peak Hr. (ML/D)Empl. Force 4,811
Fire 3.30 Existing Storage 9.05 Empl. Force 979,677 Total 14.80
Empl. Force 8,189 236.22Equal. 0.30 Total 14.80 Res. Population Max.Day (ML/D) 101.56 Pressure Zone O4M-5L Total 21.10
Waterdown ET Fire 3.30 236.22 Fire 3.30 27.97TWL 277.67 Emerg. 2.96 Pressure Zone B4 Emerg. 2.96 Emerg.
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 105.56 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 152,0394.22 9.90
34,233 TWL 198.03 236.00Equal. 8.54 Equal. 8.54 Max.Day (ML/D) 66.85TWL 203.30 0.86 TWL 200.20 Empl. Force
Equal. 13.58 Combined Pressure Zone M-4L & O-4
1.96
4.24 23.73Tyandaga Res 15.0% Headon Res Res. Population 68,152 Moore Res
Installed Capacity 5.26 267.00B-4 Pressure Zone M5L
q p g p y
0.95 ML/D 14.14
North Aldershot Res
TWL
Equal. 0.30Fire 3.30
Emerg. 0.90Total 4.50
Existing Storage 4.5
Firm Capacity
1 HGLmML
B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL
1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 25%ML ML Max.Day (ML/D) 40.91 74.92Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 23,030 Existing Storage 27.00
Total 13.96 Res. Population 19,939 Total 25.04 Empl. Force 5,776
Pressure Zone O1Emerg. 2.79 Pressure Zone B2 Emerg. 5.01 88.72 63.09
Fire 3.30 0.94 167.70 Fire 3.30Res. Population 59,988
Equal. 7.87 3.0% Equal. 16.73 135.03TWL 135.03 B-2 TWL 135.03 44.75
72.0% 25.0% 38.02 25.0710.27 Brant St Res 22.67 7.87 Washburn Res
Firm Capacity 30.00Installed Capacity 46.00
B-2 B-2
Installed Capacity 92.00 Installed Capacity ----- 99.99
Firm Capacity 50.00 28.20
15.52 ML/D Installed Capacity 13.08 Installed Capacity 136.50
ML/D 44.75 ML/D
Required Pumping Capacity Firm Capacity 6.60 Firm Capacity 109.20 Firm Capacity 60.00
Kingsway BPS 4.36 ML/D 52.58 ML/D 33.90
154.2814.33 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
100.0% Brant St. PS B-3 Washburn PS B-2 Washburn PS B-3 B-2 BPS Installed Capacity
3.31 O-2 O-2
99.99 ML/D
B-1A Firm Capacity 102.26
29.91 8.68 8.63 30.61 Required Pumping Capacity
10.00 126.74 22.0% 78.0% Davis Rd O-2
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 61.96
Res. Population 30,878Empl. Force 27,115
Max.Day (ML/D) 39.24
1.19
167.04Peak Hr. (ML/D) 14.33 21.66 Pressure Zone O2
Existing Storage 15.00 Max.Day (ML/D) 9.08 Existing Storage 17
ValveTotal 6.96 Empl. Force 2,284 Total 16.39
Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.39 Res. Population 11,379 Emerg. 3.28
9.81 3.31 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 5.23Fire 3.30 Pressure Zone B1A Existing Storage 40
Equal. 2.27 140.21 Total 16.91 Equal.
1,133TWL 140.21 Emerg. 3.38 TWL 128.016 100.0% Max.Day (ML/D) 3.31Waterdown Res Fire 3.30 McCraney Res O-2A Empl. Force
180.00TWL 135.00 Pressure Zone O2A
Equal. 10.23 88.95 Res. Population 4,466
Firm Capacity 4.79 3.31Installed Capacity ----- Kitchen Res
4.93 30.34
1.19 ML/D 3.41 23.90 6.83
Waterdown PS B-3 B-3 B-3Required Pumping Capacity 0.94 10.0% 70.0% 20.0%
ML ML
19%
81%
HGL
m
HGL MLML
MLMLML
####Criteria Dropped by:
Burloak WPP Oakville WPP
1.99
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27
Burlington WPP
Installed Capacity 152.73
Res. Population 145 Emerg. 5.01Empl. Force 142 Total 25.04
Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Existing Storage 11.00
Firm Capacity 130.00Pressure Zone B1B Fire 3.30 Installed Capacity 343.75 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 105.67
66.93 Firm Capacity 165.00126.64 Equal. 16.73 Firm Capacity 263.00 Max.Day (ML/D)Installed Capacity -----
159.2 ML/D 115.83 ML/DTWL 126.64 203.18 ML/D Empl. Force 8,8360.27 Mount Forest Res Required Pumping Capacity 66.93 Res. Population 91,417 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
100.0% 10.44 Burlington WPP 100.0% Pressure Zone B1 Burloak WPP Oakville WPP
Installed Capacity 7.55 136.25B-1B B-1 135.03
Required Pumping Capacity
0.17 1.99 ML/D
Firm Capacity 2.31
O-1100.0%
Mount Forest PS 12.42 123.83 37.34 40.91
159.21
4.35 86.48
Max.Day (ML/D) 40.91 74.92Max.Day (ML/D) 31.48 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 64.59
Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 23,030 Existing Storage 27.00
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 49.71 133.46
2026SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
Figure 9.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2026
Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
29/07/2011
5 5 6
m m m HGL
ML ML ML
ML ML ML
ML ML MLML ML ML
ML ML ML
4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML
ML ML ML
0.08 M-5L Installed Capacity
5.68 Existing Storage 50.00
Firm Capacity 30.00
Required Pumping Capacity 13.80
Existing Storage 4.55 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.26 13.80 ML/D Existing Storage
----Tyandaga. PS B-4 8.0%
Emerg. 5.95Total 5.95 Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Res. Population 7.72 Required Pumping Capacity Total 17.02 Total 29.76
Emerg. 1.19 Empl. Force 15 Milton Transfer M5T 4th Line M5L Pumps Emerg. 3.40
10.92 Equal. 20.51Fire 3.30 Res. Population 284 Fire 2.70 Fire
Equal. 1.46 Pressure Zone B5 Equal.3.30
Milton M4LTWL 236.22 292.22 TWL 236.22 TWL 236.22
Installed Capacity 0.00 100.0%0.26
Beaufort Res Zone 4 ET
20.00
Firm Capacity 8.80 B-5 Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity -----
0.27 ML/D 9.12 Firm Capacity 20.00 Firm Capacity
Required Pumping Capacity 12.0% 9.12 ML/D 20.76 ML/D
G-6L100.0%
20.755th Sideroad 5L PS 5th Sideroad 6L PS
Beaufort PS B-5 M-5L Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
30.00 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 35.35
Total 27.87 Total 21.04 Max.Day (ML/D)Empl. Force 108
Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 22,633
20.75
Burlington Water Distribution System Oakville Water Distribution System
2031 2031
June 2011 Planning Data June 2011 Planning Data
296
Equal. 19.00 Equal. 19.00 Pressure Zone G6L
Milton ET Milton Z5 Res
TWL 267.00 TWL 267.00
Georgetown 6L Res
TWL 296.00
Equal. 5.19
Fire 3.30
Emerg. 2.12Total 10.61
Existing Storage 20.00
Emerg. 5.57 Emerg. 5.57
Existing Storage 6.83 Existing Storage
2031SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
Figure 10.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2031
M5L 33%HGL
3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML
m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML
ML
HGL
m
MLMLML 2ML mML ML
MLMLML
HGL ML
HGL
O3 22%
2 2m m
HGL ML MLML MLML ML
ML ML
ML MLPeak Hr. (ML/D) 55.27 Installed Capacity 105.00 Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity 80.16
32 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity 155.00 Firm Capacity
ML/D 42.34 ML/D
Max.Day (ML/D) 35.00 Existing Storage 17.50 Existing Storage 55.16
Empl. Force 5,069 Total 15.06 Total 14.11 60.80 ML/D 111.44
39.02 Eighth Line BPS O-3
Res. Population 52,460 Emerg. 3.01 Emerg. 2.82 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Pressure Zone B3 Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps Kitchen O3 Pumps 16.72
1.19 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 88.02Bailie Res Appleby Res 94.72
O-3 O-3200.20 Equal. 8.75 Equal. 7.99 30.0%
TWL 167.93 TWL 167.7070.0%
100.0% 31.43 Max.Day (ML/D) 55.74B2, B3A, B5A Installed Capacity 19.19 Installed Capacity ----- Empl. Force
Firm Capacity 9.20 Firm Capacity 30.00 Res. Population 68,855 3.327,486 43.23
198.03
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 1.88 5.04 ML/D 28.69 ML/D Pressure Zone O3
Appleby PS - B-3 126.15Max.Day (ML/D) 1.19 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
Pressure Zone B2, B3A, B5A
Res. Population 2,169Empl. Force 0 Bailie PS B-4
0.08 Total 17.77277.67 23.43 Existing Storage 17.6
Equal. 10.92Fire 3.30
Emerg. 3.55
Max.Day (ML/D) 82.03 Eighth Line ResPeak Hr. (ML/D) 129.52 TWL 167.64
4.95 Res. Population 119,474 Firm Capacity 140.00Empl. Force 8,465 Installed Capacity -----
43.73
85.0% Pressure Zone M4L 126.15 ML/D Installed Capacity 64.45
B-4 236.00 Required Pumping Capacity 116.90 8.80 Firm Capacity
Existing Storage 2.0 NO M4L Pumps 93.0% 7.0% 43.24 ML/D Peak Hr. (ML/D) 68.95
Total 4.50 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 9.20 M-4L/O-4 M-4L/O-4 Required Pumping Capacity Max.Day (ML/D) 43.67
198.48 Res. Population 63,079Emerg. 0.90 Max.Day (ML/D) 5.83 60.80 Eighth Line PS O-4
Existing Storage 18 80.0% Existing Storage 32 Peak Hr. (ML/D)Empl. Force 5,275
Fire 3.30 Existing Storage 9.05 Empl. Force 999,879 Total 15.06
Empl. Force 13,740 236.22Equal. 0.30 Total 15.06 Res. Population Max.Day (ML/D) 125.70 Pressure Zone O4M-5L Total 21.54
Waterdown ET Fire 3.30 236.22 Fire 3.30 34.43TWL 277.67 Emerg. 3.01 Pressure Zone B4 Emerg. 3.01 Emerg.
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 120.00 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 182,5544.31 9.24
42,305 TWL 198.03 236.00Equal. 8.75 Equal. 8.75 Max.Day (ML/D) 76.00TWL 203.30 0.87 TWL 200.20 Empl. Force
Equal. 13.94 Combined Pressure Zone M-4L & O-4
Firm Capacity 1.96
4.55 29.88Tyandaga Res 15.0% Headon Res Res. Population 72,952 Moore Res
Installed Capacity 5.26 267.00B-4 Pressure Zone M5L
q p g p y
0.96 ML/D 13.80
North Aldershot Res
TWL
Equal. 0.30Fire 3.30
Emerg. 0.90Total 4.50
Existing Storage 4.5
1 HGLmML
B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL
1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 22%ML ML
Res. Population 62,343
Max.Day (ML/D) 42.64 75.96Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 23,130 Existing Storage 27.00Total 14.11 Res. Population 20,400 Total 25.62 Empl. Force 6,002
Pressure Zone O1Emerg. 2.82 Pressure Zone B2 Emerg. 5.12 120.57 75.65
Fire 3.30 0.96 167.70 Fire 3.30Equal. 7.99 3.0% Equal. 17.20 135.03TWL 135.03 B-2 TWL 135.03 44.90
72.0% 25.0% 51.67 23.9810.44 Brant St Res 23.00 7.99 Washburn Res
Firm Capacity 30.00Installed Capacity 46.00
B-2 B-2
Installed Capacity 92.00 Installed Capacity ----- 99.94
Firm Capacity 50.00 28.19
15.80 ML/D Installed Capacity 13.08 Installed Capacity 136.50
ML/D 44.90 ML/D
Required Pumping Capacity Firm Capacity 6.60 Firm Capacity 109.20 Firm Capacity 60.00
Kingsway BPS 6.21 ML/D 53.16 ML/D 32.50
14.61 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
100.0% Brant St. PS B-3 Washburn PS B-2 Washburn PS B-3 B-2 BPS
5.16 O-2 O-2
Installed Capacity
99.95 ML/D
B-1A Firm Capacity 102.26
30.16 8.73 9.36 33.20 Required Pumping Capacity
8.00 172.24 22.0% 78.0% Davis Rd O-2
154.28
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 67.20
Res. Population 34,471Empl. Force 28,014
Max.Day (ML/D) 42.56
1.19
167.04Peak Hr. (ML/D) 14.61 19.96 Pressure Zone O2
Existing Storage 15.00 Max.Day (ML/D) 9.25 Existing Storage 17
ValveTotal 7.02 Empl. Force 2,307 Total 17.43
Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.40 Res. Population 11,604 Emerg. 3.49
10.64 3.32 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 5.23Fire 3.30 Pressure Zone B1A Existing Storage 40
Equal. 2.31 140.21 Total 17.45 Equal.
1,184TWL 140.21 Emerg. 3.49 TWL 128.016 100.0% Max.Day (ML/D) 3.32Waterdown Res Fire 3.30 McCraney Res O-2A Empl. Force
180.00TWL 135.00 Pressure Zone O2A
Equal. 10.66 85.57 Res. Population 4,417
Firm Capacity 4.79 3.32Installed Capacity ----- Kitchen Res
5.04 28.69
1.19 ML/D 5.25 24.50 5.25
Waterdown PS B-3 B-3 B-3Required Pumping Capacity 0.96 15.0% 70.0% 15.0%
ML ML
15%
85%
HGL
m
HGL MLML
MLMLML
####Criteria Dropped by:
Burloak WPP Oakville WPP
Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity 152.73
118.61 ML/D
Oakville WPP
Firm Capacity 263.00 Max.Day (ML/D)
205.0 ML/D
2.01
TWL 126.64 203.25 ML/D Empl. Force 9,424
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.28
Burlington WPP
Empl. Force 152 Total 25.62Max.Day (ML/D) 0.18 Existing Storage 11.00
Res. Population 143 Emerg. 5.12
Firm Capacity 130.00Pressure Zone B1B Fire 3.30 Installed Capacity 343.75 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 108.62
68.79 Firm Capacity 220.00126.64 Equal. 17.20
0.28 Mount Forest Res Required Pumping Capacity 68.79 Res. Population 93,901 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity
100.0% 10.62 Burlington WPP 100.0% Pressure Zone B1 Burloak WPP
Installed Capacity 7.55 134.46B-1B B-1 135.03
Required Pumping Capacity
0.18 2.01 ML/D
Firm Capacity 2.31
O-1100.0%
Mount Forest PS 12.62 121.83 36.17 42.64
204.95
Peak Hr. (ML/D) 50.44 165.476.21 85.67
Max.Day (ML/D) 42.64 75.96Max.Day (ML/D) 31.94 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 67.33
Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 23,130 Existing Storage 27.00
2031SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx
Figure 10.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2031
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 36
Table 17. Water Storage Requirements
2011 A: Fire Storage B:
Equalization C:
Emergency TOTAL
REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)
2016 A: Fire Storage B: Equalization
C: Emergency
TOTAL REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)
South Halton
Max Day Demand
Equivalent Population
Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand
25% of A + B
South Halton
Max Day Demand
Equivalent Population
Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand
25% of A + B
(m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML) (m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML)
B1 61,360 110,003 311 3 3,362 15,339.98 4,675.60 23.4
B1 62,679 112,221 311 3 3,362 15,669.87 4,758.07 23.8
B1A 8,625 15,435 311 3 3,362 2,156.25 1,379.66 6.9
B1A 8,831 15,781 311 3 3,362 2,207.73 1,392.53 7.0
B3A, B4A,
B5A 587 1,169 311 3 3,362 146.87 877.32 4.4
B3A, B4A,
B5A 916 1,721 311 3 3,362 229.11 897.88 4.5
B1B 160 288 311 3 3,362 40.04 850.61 4.3
B1B 169 303 311 3 3,362 42.24 851.16 4.3
B2 30,400 54,499 311 3 3,362 7,600.10 2,740.63 13.7
B2 30,742 55,073 311 3 3,362 7,685.52 2,761.98 13.8
B3 32,863 59,692 311 3 3,362 8,215.72 2,894.53 14.5
B3 33,344 60,500 311 3 3,362 8,336.07 2,924.62 14.6
B4 5,597 9,980 311 3 3,362 1,399.35 1,190.44 6.0
B4 5,649 10,067 311 3 3,362 1,412.29 1,193.67 6.0
B5 177 315 311 3 3,362 44.22 851.66 4.3
B5 176 314 311 3 3,362 44.03 851.61 4.3
M4L 5,628 11,819 311 3 3,362 1,406.95 1,192.34 6.0
M4L 22,397 39,937 311 3 3,362 5,599.29 2,240.42 11.2
M5L 43,202 72,709 311 3 3,362 10,800.42 3,540.70 17.7
M5L 54,090 89,988 311 3 3,362 13,522.38 4,221.19 21.1
M5G 12,313 31,829 311 3 3,362 3,078.20 1,610.15 8.1
M5G 14,014 35,683 311 3 3,362 3,503.54 1,716.49 8.6
G6L 31 908 311 3 3,362 7.65 842.51 4.2
G6L 35 915 311 3 3,362 8.74 842.78 4.2
G5G, G6G,
G7G 24,485 44,621 311 3 3,362 6,121.15 2,370.89 11.9
G5G, G6G,
G7G 25,669 46,976 311 3 3,362 6,417.22 2,444.91 12.2
A9G 5,479 12,553 250 3 2,700 1,369.63 1,017.41 5.1
A9G 5,658 12,513 250 3 2,700 1,414.49 1,028.62 5.1
O1 36,864 65,979 311 3 3,362 9,215.92 3,144.58 15.7
O1 37,742 67,453 311 3 3,362 9,435.58 3,199.49 16.0
O2 30,560 54,884 311 3 3,362 7,640.12 2,750.63 13.8
O2 33,190 59,299 311 3 3,362 8,297.53 2,914.98 14.6
O2A 3,476 6,172 311 3 3,362 869.08 1,057.87 5.3
O2A 3,415 6,070 311 3 3,362 853.82 1,054.06 5.3
O3 47,149 84,205 311 3 3,362 11,787.24 3,787.41 18.9
O3 52,050 92,440 311 3 3,362 13,012.43 4,093.71 20.5
O4 11,348 21,578 311 3 3,362 2,836.91 1,549.83 7.7
O4 23,318 41,647 311 3 3,362 5,829.47 2,297.97 11.5
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 37
2021 A: Fire Storage B:
Equalization C:
Emergency TOTAL
REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)
2026 A: Fire Storage B: Equalization
C: Emergency
TOTAL REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)
South Halton
Max Day Demand
Equivalent Population
Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand
25% of A + B South Halton
Max Day Demand
Equivalent Population
Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand
25% of A + B
(m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML) (m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML)
B1 64,597 115,439 311 3 3,362 16,149.20 4,877.90 24.4
B1 66,926 119,344 311 3 3,362 16,731.50 5,023.47 25.1
B1A 9,064 16,171 311 3 3,362 2,265.90 1,407.07 7.0
B1A 9,077 16,194 311 3 3,362 2,269.28 1,407.92 7.0
B3A, B4A,
B5A 1,199 2,195 311 3 3,362 299.84 915.56 4.6
B3A, B4A,
B5A 1,190 2,179 311 3 3,362 297.40 914.95 4.6
B1B 169 304 311 3 3,362 42.37 851.19 4.3
B1B 171 305 311 3 3,362 42.63 851.26 4.3
B2 31,320 56,044 311 3 3,362 7,829.99 2,798.10 14.0
B2 31,483 56,317 311 3 3,362 7,870.63 2,808.26 14.0
B3 34,040 61,669 311 3 3,362 8,510.10 2,968.12 14.8
B3 34,146 61,847 311 3 3,362 8,536.61 2,974.75 14.9
B4 5,708 10,166 311 3 3,362 1,427.07 1,197.37 6.0
B4 5,703 10,158 311 3 3,362 1,425.82 1,197.06 6.0
B5 173 309 311 3 3,362 43.33 851.43 4.3
B5 170 303 311 3 3,362 42.38 851.20 4.3
M4L 41,223 71,502 311 3 3,362 10,305.69 3,417.02 17.1
M4L 60,787 104,306 311 3 3,362 15,196.71 4,639.78 23.2
M5L 64,229 105,835 311 3 3,362 16,057.14 4,854.89 24.3
M5L 74,306 121,805 311 3 3,362 18,576.47 5,484.72 27.4
M5G 15,221 38,888 311 3 3,362 3,805.34 1,791.93 9.0
M5G 15,329 40,030 311 3 3,362 3,832.36 1,798.69 9.0
G6L 8,661 904 311 3 3,362 2,165.13 1,381.88 6.9
G6L 15,698 12,635 311 3 3,362 3,924.47 1,821.72 9.1
G5G, G6G,
G7G 18,797 50,481 311 3 3,362 4,699.20 2,015.40 10.1
G5G, G6G,
G7G 19,843 52,643 311 3 3,362 4,960.82 2,080.80 10.4
A9G 6,258 13,311 250 3 2,700 1,564.58 1,066.14 5.3
A9G 7,670 16,122 250 3 2,700 1,917.62 1,154.40 5.8
O1 39,647 70,648 311 3 3,362 9,911.70 3,318.53 16.6
O1 40,908 72,763 311 3 3,362 10,227.12 3,397.38 17.0
O2 36,499 64,849 311 3 3,362 9,124.82 3,121.81 15.6
O2 39,243 69,449 311 3 3,362 9,810.69 3,293.27 16.5
O2A 3,355 5,970 311 3 3,362 838.86 1,050.32 5.3
O2A 3,312 5,896 311 3 3,362 827.92 1,047.58 5.2
O3 54,406 96,402 311 3 3,362 13,601.44 4,240.96 21.2
O3 54,305 96,233 311 3 3,362 13,576.20 4,234.65 21.2
O4 36,563 63,864 311 3 3,362 9,140.74 3,125.78 15.6
O4 40,774 70,925 311 3 3,362 10,193.39 3,388.95 16.9
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 38
2031 A: Fire Storage B: Equalization C: Emergency TOTAL
REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)
South Halton
Max Day Demand
Equivalent Population
Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand
25% of A + B
(m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML)
B1 68,790 122,471 311 3 3,362 17,197.52 5,139.98 25.7
B1A 9,254 16,491 311 3 3,362 2,313.55 1,418.99 7.1
B3A, B4A,
B5A 1,188 2,176 311 3 3,362 297.01 914.85 4.6
B1B 175 313 311 3 3,362 43.77 851.54 4.3
B2 31,944 57,092 311 3 3,362 7,986.01 2,837.10 14.2
B3 35,004 63,285 311 3 3,362 8,750.91 3,028.33 15.1
B4 5,827 10,365 311 3 3,362 1,456.68 1,204.77 6.0
B5 167 298 311 3 3,362 41.74 851.03 4.3
M4L 82,032 139,947 311 3 3,362 20,508.12 5,967.63 29.8
M5L 83,716 137,166 311 3 3,362 20,928.95 6,072.84 30.4
M5G 15,843 41,337 311 3 3,362 3,960.71 1,830.78 9.2
G6L 20,751 21,017 311 3 3,362 5,187.74 2,137.53 10.7
G5G, G6G,
G7G 23,214 58,944 311 3 3,362 5,803.44 2,291.46 11.5
A9G 8,341 17,459 250 3 2,700 2,085.36 1,196.34 6.0
O1 42,644 75,674 311 3 3,362 10,661.05 3,505.86 17.5
O2 42,561 75,016 311 3 3,362 10,640.15 3,500.64 17.5
O2A 3,315 5,903 311 3 3,362 828.82 1,047.81 5.2
O3 55,744 98,646 311 3 3,362 13,935.97 4,324.59 21.6
O4 43,671 75,784 311 3 3,362 10,917.77 3,570.04 17.9
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 39
5. Water Capital Program
The complete water capital program for the servicing strategies developed under the Sustainable Halton is provided in Table 18. This table provides Regional IPFS IDs, project descriptions, cost estimating details, and calculation of DC criteria. A project table listing key projects considered DC eligible although below sizing criteria is provided attached. The preferred water servicing strategy is depicted in Figure 11 and is based on the following key area components: Milton Lake Based Water Servicing
Milton lake-based service area includes existing areas outside the central core of the community and is serviced by Zone M4L and M5L.
Water supply is from the existing and proposed expansions of the WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs north to Milton.
Additional areas of the existing groundwater serviced area will need to be transferred to lake based supply to ensure sustainable groundwater and lake based service areas.
Components of the servicing strategy for the Milton lake-based service area include: Implement 2nd spine up Trafalgar Road alignment and 3rd spine along Neyagawa Boulevard. Implement new Zone 4/5 Boundary. Switchover strategic areas from Groundwater Supply to Lake Based Supply. Stage Oakville/Milton upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Additional Zone 4/5 Storage. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused
by intensification. This strategy provides security of supply to Milton and integrates Zone 4 and Zone 5 infrastructure.
Core Milton Groundwater Servicing
Upgrade Kelso WPP. Upgrade Feedermain to Main Street Reservoir. Decommission Walkers Line Well Field facilities. Switchover strategic areas of Milton, predominantly employment, to help alleviate groundwater capacity
constraints. Milton & Halton Hills 401 Employment Corridor Lake Based Water Servicing
Milton/Halton Hills 401 Corridor lake-based service area includes existing areas generally along Steeles Ave and is serviced by Zone M5L.
Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs north to Milton.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 40
Components of the servicing strategy for the Milton/Halton Hills 401 Corridor lake-based service area include:
Implement 2nd spine up Trafalgar Road alignment and 3rd Spine along Neyagawa Boulevard and a future road alignment.
Implement new Zone 4/5 Boundary. Stage Oakville/Milton upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. Implement Zone 5 Pumping Station (at Zone 4 Reservoir) and transmission for additional feed to 401
Corridor and Business Park II. This strategy provides security of supply to Milton and integrates Zone 4 and Zone 5 infrastructure.
North Oakville (East Growth Area) Water Servicing
The North Oakville (East Growth Areas) are generally located east of Sixteen Mile Creek. Part of these lands are serviced by pressure zone O3 and the remainder is serviced by pressure zone O4.
Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.
Maximize capacity from existing 8th Line infrastructure and expand capacity from the Kitchen Reservoir and PS and new Oakville Zone 4 pumping station
Components of the servicing strategy for North Oakville include:
Stage Oakville upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure and integrates capacity and timing
with infrastructure required for Milton. North Oakville (West Growth Area) Water Servicing
The North Oakville (West Growth Areas) are generally located west of Sixteen Mile Creek. These lands are serviced by pressure zone O3.
Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.
Components of the servicing strategy for North Oakville include:
Stage Oakville upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure and integrates capacity and timing
with infrastructure required for Burlington.
Oakville (Central) Water Servicing
The Oakville (Central Areas) are generally located east of Bronte Creek and South of Dundas. These lands are serviced by pressure zone O1, O2 and parts of O3.
Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 41
Components of the servicing strategy for Oakville include:
Stage Oakville upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide interconnection with Burlington at both Zone 2 and Zone 3 for improved service level and security
of supply. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure and integrates capacity and timing
with infrastructure required for Burlington. Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused
by intensification. Burlington (Central) Water Servicing
The Burlington (Central Areas) include all areas in Burlington south of the Hwy 407 and Dundas Street excluding the North Aldershot areas. These lands are serviced by pressure zones B1, B2, B3, B4 and B5.
Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario (primarily the Burlington WPP) and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.
Components of the servicing strategy for Burlington include:
Stage Burlington upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Enhance transmission capacity to the Washburn reservoir and PS as well as in Zone 4 and Zone 5. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure and integrates capacity and timing
with infrastructure required for Oakville. Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused
by intensification. North Aldershot Water Servicing
The North Aldershot service areas include all areas in Burlington generally west of the Hwy QEW. These lands are serviced by pressure zones B1, B1A, B1B, B2 and B3A, B4A and B5A. Based on the topography, the areas in North Aldershot, north of the Hwy 403, will required several additional pressure zones.
Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario (primarily the Burlington WPP) and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.
Components of the servicing strategy for North Aldershot include:
Stage Burlington upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP. Continue to maintain water supply interconnection from Hamilton. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure in Burlington and integrates capacity
and timing with infrastructure required for Oakville. Inter-Regional servicing from Hamilton for areas in Bridgeview and Snake Road continues to be a
preferred solution. Additional coordination of inter-Regional servicing for areas in North Aldershot will be undertaken. At this time, a Halton-only solution is identified.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 42
Georgetown Water Servicing
Maximize the groundwater service area. Provide new lake based water supply to new growth areas as well as transfer Southwest Georgetown and
Stewarttown to lake based supply in order to maintain the groundwater system within sustainable yields
Increased water taking at Cedarvale and Lindsay Court Well Fields. New Standby Wells at Lindsay Court. Expand water storage capacity at 22 Sideroad Reservoir. Artificial Recharge to Silver Creek / wetlands as support to overall strategy. Georgetown lake-based service area will be known as Zone G6L, this will include the existing area of
Georgetown South and Stewarttown along with the new growth area in Southwest Georgetown bounded by Trafalgar Road and No. 10 Side Road.
Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs north to Georgetown.
Components of the servicing strategy for the Georgetown lake-based service area include:
New Zone 6 Pumping Station and Zone 4 reservoir at Trafalgar Road and No. 5 Side Road. New transmission main along Trafalgar Road. New lake based Zone 6 Reservoir at 22nd Side Road. Security of supply Lake-Based servicing connection to the Region of Peel at Bovaird Drive West. Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused
by intensification. Acton Water Servicing
Maintain the existing and future service areas on groundwater. Increase groundwater capacity at the Fourth Line and Prospect Park Well Fields as well as provide
additional new groundwater capacity. Maximize groundwater capacity and redundancy through centralized treatment for the northern supplies. Artificial Recharge to Black Creek / wetlands as support to the overall strategy.
Components of the servicing strategy for the Georgetown lake-based service area include:
Increased water taking at Prospect Park and Fourth Line Well Fields. Third Line Reservoir to be expanded. New north Acton Well. New Standby Well at 4th Line. Centralized Treatment at Third Line Reservoir Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused
by intensification.
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
Table 18 ‐ Water Capital Program
Region IPFS ID
Project Description Municipality Project Type Size/Capacity Length 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
54 30 ML/d Pumping Station at Appleby Line Reservoir (Zone B3) BUR P.S. 30.0 ML/d 5,552,000$ 1,936,040$ 7,488,040$ 2,621,223$ 164,737$ 10,274,000$ -$ -$ 10,274,000$ 7,397,280$ 2,876,720$ 1,027,000$ 9,247,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
97 Lindsay Court Well Field Expansion Class EA Study HHGEO Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 252,000$ 98,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4950 SCADA Master Plan Review for Water Purification Plants and Distribution Systems REG Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 126,000$ -$ 74,000$ 53,280$ 20,720$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4985 1200 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from Britannia Rd to new Zone 4 Reservoir (Zone M4) HHGEO WM 1200 mm 9129 m 22,223,599$ 21,191,680$ 43,415,280$ 15,195,584$ 955,136$ 59,566,000$ -$ -$ 59,566,000$ 42,887,520$ 16,678,480$ 11,913,200$ -$ 47,652,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5716 Upgrade piping between Prospect Park Wells and WPP (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 377,000$ -$ -$ 377,000$ 271,440$ 105,560$ 75,400$ 301,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5717 Prospect Park WPP Expansion from 2.3 to 3.5 ML/d (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,513,000$ -$ -$ 3,513,000$ 2,529,360$ 983,640$ -$ 702,600$ 2,810,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5725 Water Servicing Master Plan Update REG Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,715,000$ -$ -$ 1,715,000$ 1,234,800$ 480,200$ -$ -$ 1,715,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5757 Cedarvale Capture Zone Assessment HHGEO Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 216,000$ 84,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5917 SCADA System Network Architecture Improvement Program (REG) REG Study 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 95,000$ -$ 55,000$ 39,600$ 15,400$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5918 Electrical Utility Meter Monitoring Installation Program (SCADA) (REG) REG Study 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 190,000$ 120,000$ -$ 70,000$ 50,400$ 19,600$ -$ 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5951 Design of Burloak WPP Phase 2 Expansion from 55 to 165 ML/d. OAK WPP 110.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,327,000$ -$ -$ 11,327,000$ 8,155,440$ 3,171,560$ -$ -$ 11,327,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6189 Water Supply Capacity Annual Monitoring Report REG Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 450,000$ 324,000$ 126,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6190 Water Distribution System Analysis REG Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ 1,584,000$ 616,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$
6364 1500 mm WM from Zone 2 Burloak PS to Kitchen Reservoir (Zone O1) (Construction) OAK WM 1500 mm 4450 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 53,062,000$ -$ 5,400,000$ 47,662,000$ 34,316,640$ 13,345,360$ 53,062,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6365 1800 mm WM from Burloak WPP to Burloak Zone 2 Booster Pumping Station (Zone O1) (Construction) BUR WM 1800 mm 2250 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 17,460,000$ -$ 3,200,000$ 14,260,000$ 10,267,200$ 3,992,800$ 17,460,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6372 Construction of Burloak WPP Phase 2 Expansion from 55 to 165 ML/d OAK WPP 110.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 98,433,000$ -$ -$ 98,433,000$ 70,871,760$ 27,561,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 98,433,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6437 Acton Well Field Development and Treatment (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,543,000$ -$ -$ 1,543,000$ 1,110,960$ 432,040$ -$ -$ 433,600$ -$ 1,109,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6439 Prospect Park Well Field Upgrades (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 807,000$ -$ -$ 807,000$ 581,040$ 225,960$ 161,400$ 645,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6440 Cedarvale Well Field Upgrades (Zone G6G) HHGEO WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,375,000$ -$ -$ 1,375,000$ 990,000$ 385,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6590 Acton Supply Standby Well (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,625,000$ -$ -$ 1,625,000$ 1,170,000$ 455,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 450,000$ -$ 1,175,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6605 750 mm WM Second feed to Washburn Reservoir (Zone B1) BUR WM 750 mm 4092 m 5,317,696$ 12,244,784$ 17,562,480$ 6,147,146$ 386,375$ 24,096,000$ 19,759,000$ -$ 4,337,000$ 3,122,640$ 1,214,360$ 4,819,200$ -$ 19,276,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6606 750 mm WM on Trafalgar from the new Zone 4 Reservoir to approximately 1,650 m north (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 1675 m 2,176,955$ 101,126$ 2,278,082$ 797,801$ 50,118$ 3,126,000$ -$ -$ 3,126,000$ 2,250,720$ 875,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 625,200$ 2,500,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6607 750 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from 1,650 m north of Zone 4 Reservoir to No 10 Siderd (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 1519 m 1,973,476$ 584,628$ 2,558,104$ 895,618$ 56,278$ 3,510,000$ -$ -$ 3,510,000$ 2,527,200$ 982,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 702,000$ 2,808,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6661 900 mm Second Feedermain to Davis Road Booster Pumping Station (Zone O1) OAK WM 900 mm 2388 m 3,998,067$ 6,478,735$ 10,476,803$ 3,467,228$ 226,970$ 14,171,000$ 6,802,000$ -$ 7,369,000$ 5,305,680$ 2,063,320$ 2,934,200$ -$ 11,236,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6668 Centralized Treatment at 3rd line Reservoir Class EA Study (Zone A9G) HHACT Study 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 108,000$ 42,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6675 Kelso WPP Residual Management Study & optimization (Zone M5G) MIL WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ 2,880,000$ 1,120,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6676 Acton Artificial Recharge Study HHACT Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ 180,000$ 70,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6677 Acton Artificial Recharge Capital Works HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,300,000$ 3,150,000$ -$ 3,150,000$ 2,268,000$ 882,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 1,260,000$ 4,940,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6678 Georgetown Artificial Recharge Study HHGEO Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ 180,000$ 70,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6679 Georgetown Artificial Recharge Capital Works HHGEO WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 29,600,000$ 14,800,000$ -$ 14,800,000$ 10,656,000$ 4,144,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 5,920,000$ 23,580,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6680 Oakville WPP Intake Pipe Extension - Design OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ 150,000$ -$ 1,350,000$ 972,000$ 378,000$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6681 Oakville WPP Intake Pipe Extension - Construction OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,500,000$ 850,000$ -$ 7,650,000$ 5,508,000$ 2,142,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6682 Class EA Study of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 100,000$ -$ 900,000$ 648,000$ 252,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6683 Design of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d. OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,464,000$ 346,000$ -$ 3,118,000$ 2,244,960$ 873,040$ -$ -$ 3,464,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6684 Construction of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,803,000$ 2,080,000$ -$ 18,723,000$ 13,480,560$ 5,242,440$ -$ -$ -$ 20,803,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6685 Bulk Water Stations on Existing Sites REG P.S. - - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,868,000$ -$ -$ 1,868,000$ 1,344,960$ 523,040$ 373,600$ 1,494,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6686 Bulk Water Stations on New Sites REG P.S. - - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,267,000$ -$ -$ 3,267,000$ 2,352,240$ 914,760$ 653,400$ 2,613,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6693 20 ML/d Zone G6L pumping station at Zone 4 Reservoir HHGEO P.S. 20.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$ 6,480,000$ 2,520,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,800,000$ 7,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6695 Centralized Treatment at 3rd line Reservoir (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP 5.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,541,000$ -$ -$ 1,541,000$ 1,109,520$ 431,480$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 308,200$ 1,232,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6699 Burloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Design) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d BUR WPP 55.0 ML/d 11,849,000$ -$ 10,664,000$ 1,185,000$ 853,200$ 331,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,849,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6700 Burloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Construction) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d BUR WPP 55.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 76,008,000$ -$ 68,407,000$ 7,601,000$ 5,472,720$ 2,128,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 76,008,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6770 Burloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Class EA Study) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d BUR WPP 55.0 ML/d 1,323,000$ -$ 1,191,000$ 132,000$ 95,040$ 36,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,323,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
490,993,000$ 48,878,000$ 88,862,000$ 353,253,000$ 254,342,160$ 98,910,840$ 98,434,400$ 16,549,800$ 100,046,400$ 29,238,000$ 128,217,400$ 10,455,000$ 9,132,200$ 5,463,800$ 1,330,000$ 1,628,000$ 418,200$ 13,191,800$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 76,118,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$
Distribution - Greenfield
82 400 mm Zone 2 WM on 3rd Line from Wyecroft Rd to North Service Road (Zone O2) OAK WM 400 mm 574 m 402,437$ 313,015$ 715,452$ 250,808$ 15,740$ 982,000$ -$ -$ 982,000$ 726,680$ 255,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 196,400$ 785,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
3699 4.5 ML North Aldershot in ground Reservoir (Zone B3A) BUR P.S. 4.5 ML 3,330,000$ 366,600$ 3,696,600$ 1,294,075$ 81,325$ 5,072,000$ -$ -$ 5,072,000$ 3,753,280$ 1,318,720$ -$ 1,014,400$ 4,057,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
3700 400 mm WM from Waterdown Reservoir pumping station to new North Aldershot Reservoir (Zone B3A) BUR WM 400 mm 1496 m 1,049,443$ 611,725$ 1,661,168$ 581,286$ 36,546$ 2,279,000$ -$ -$ 2,279,000$ 1,686,460$ 592,540$ -$ 455,800$ 1,823,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
3713 400mm WM on Burnhamthorpe Rd from Trafalgar Rd to new North Oakville road. (Zone O4) (Design) OAK WM 400 mm 1359 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 317,000$ -$ -$ 317,000$ 234,580$ 82,420$ -$ -$ 317,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4983 400 mm WM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Dundas St (Zone O4) (Design) OAK WM 400 mm 2101 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 424,000$ -$ -$ 424,000$ 313,760$ 110,240$ -$ 424,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5061 30 ML Reservoir, near Trafalgar Road and No.5 Siderd (Zone M4) HHGEO RES. 30.0 ML 22,200,000$ 1,444,000$ 23,644,000$ 8,275,832$ 520,168$ 32,440,000$ -$ -$ 32,440,000$ 24,005,600$ 8,434,400$ 7,488,000$ -$ 24,952,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5627 600 mm WM through North Oakville Lands from Tremaine Rd to Bronte Rd (Zone O3) OAK WM 600 mm 3004 m 2,957,853$ 2,317,958$ 5,275,812$ 1,846,121$ 116,068$ 7,238,000$ -$ -$ 7,238,000$ 5,356,120$ 1,881,880$ 1,447,600$ 5,790,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5632 300 mm WM on 9th Line from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Dundas St (Zone O4) OAK WM 300 mm 2051 m 1,330,753$ 312,072$ 1,642,826$ 575,032$ 36,142$ 2,254,000$ -$ -$ 2,254,000$ 1,667,960$ 586,040$ -$ -$ 450,800$ 1,803,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5633 300 mm WM on Burnhamthorpe Rd from new North Oakville road to 9th Line (Zone O4) OAK WM 300 mm 1520 m 986,643$ 720,551$ 1,707,193$ 597,249$ 37,558$ 2,342,000$ -$ -$ 2,342,000$ 1,733,080$ 608,920$ -$ -$ 468,400$ 1,873,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5718 Acton Reservoir Expansion from 4.5 to 7.0 ML (Construction) (Zone A9G) HHACT RES 2.5 ML 1,850,000$ 37,000$ 1,887,000$ 1,091,475$ 38,525$ 3,017,000$ -$ -$ 3,017,000$ 2,232,580$ 784,420$ -$ 117,000$ 2,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5850 1050 mm WM on Upper Middle Rd from Burloak Dr west to Appleby Line (Zone B2) (Construction) BUR WM 1050 mm 1955 m 3,940,549$ 2,978,838$ 6,919,387$ 1,453,347$ 141,266$ 8,514,000$ -$ 2,855,000$ 5,659,000$ 4,187,660$ 1,471,340$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,514,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5853 600 mm WM on Tremaine Rd from Dundas St to approximately 950 m north (North Oakville Lands) (Zone O3) OAK WM 600 mm 927 m 913,034$ 56,652$ 969,687$ 338,980$ 21,333$ 1,330,000$ -$ -$ 1,330,000$ 984,200$ 345,800$ 266,000$ 1,064,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5862400 mm WM loop from 5th Line running east then south on new Milton Business Park Roads to Derry Rd west to 5th Line (Zone M4)
MIL WM 400 mm 2367 m 1,660,580$ 890,523$ 2,551,102$ 892,773$ 56,124$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ 2,590,000$ 910,000$ -$ 700,000$ 2,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5867 1200 mm WM on Britannia Rd from 4th Line to RR 25 (Zone M4) MIL WM 1200 mm 2858 m 6,957,379$ 7,276,326$ 14,233,705$ 4,982,154$ 313,142$ 19,529,000$ -$ 6,167,000$ 13,362,000$ 9,887,880$ 3,474,120$ -$ -$ -$ 3,905,800$ 15,623,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5868 750 mm WM on Britannia Rd from #5867 to approximately 2,100 m west (to new Milton South road) (Zone M4) MIL WM 750 mm 2048 m 2,661,978$ 2,876,697$ 5,538,675$ 1,938,474$ 121,851$ 7,599,000$ -$ -$ 7,599,000$ 5,623,260$ 1,975,740$ -$ 1,519,800$ 6,079,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5870 400 mm WM on new Milton South road from Britannia Rd to Louis St Laurent Ave (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1564 m 1,097,187$ 79,531$ 1,176,718$ 411,394$ 25,888$ 1,614,000$ -$ -$ 1,614,000$ 1,194,360$ 419,640$ -$ 322,800$ 1,291,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5875 900 mm WM on Derry Rd from new MIL Business Park Road to Trafalgar Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 900 mm 2719 m 4,553,899$ 2,387,233$ 6,941,131$ 2,429,164$ 152,705$ 9,523,000$ -$ -$ 9,523,000$ 7,047,020$ 2,475,980$ -$ 1,904,600$ 7,618,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5876 600 mm WM on new internal Milton road from Britannia Rd to Louis St Laurent Ave (Zone M4) MIL WM 600 mm 1543 m 1,518,772$ 468,247$ 1,987,018$ 695,267$ 43,714$ 2,726,000$ -$ -$ 2,726,000$ 2,017,240$ 708,760$ 545,200$ -$ 2,180,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5881 400 mm WM from Waterdown pumping station along North Service Rd to King Rd (Zone B2) BUR WM 400 mm 2916 m 2,045,144$ 2,764,235$ 4,809,380$ 1,682,814$ 105,806$ 6,598,000$ -$ -$ 6,598,000$ 4,882,520$ 1,715,480$ -$ 1,319,600$ 5,278,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6318 300mm WM on No 14 Siderd from Tremaine Rd. to Milton Reservoir (Zone M5G) MIL WM -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,046,000$ 815,000$ -$ 231,000$ 170,940$ 60,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 209,200$ 836,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6362 600mm in North Oakville along 6th Line to Burnhamthorpe Rd (Zone O4) OAK WM 600 mm 1019 m 1,003,147$ 457,934$ 1,461,081$ 511,775$ 32,144$ 2,005,000$ -$ -$ 2,005,000$ 1,483,700$ 521,300$ -$ -$ 401,000$ 1,604,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6367 120 ML/d Burloak Pumping Station Construction, Phase 1, 50 MLD (Zone B2) BUR P.S. 120.0 ML/d 10,000,000$ 700,000$ 10,700,000$ 1,605,432$ 216,568$ 12,522,000$ -$ 8,390,000$ 4,132,000$ 3,057,680$ 1,074,320$ -$ 12,522,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6368 1050 mm WM from Burloak Pumping Station north on Burloak Dr to Upper Middle Rd (Zone B2) (Construction) OAK WM 1050 mm 2460 m 4,959,044$ 335,897$ 5,294,941$ 1,111,958$ 108,102$ 6,515,000$ -$ 2,711,000$ 3,804,000$ 2,814,960$ 989,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,515,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6370 750 mm WM on Dundas St from 6th Line to WM #5321 at Dundas St and Neyagawa Blvd (Construction) (Zone O3) OAK WM 750 mm 2049 m 2,663,546$ 2,061,142$ 4,724,688$ 991,853$ 96,459$ 5,813,000$ -$ -$ 5,813,000$ 4,301,620$ 1,511,380$ -$ 5,813,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6375 400 mm WM on Dundas St from new North Oakville road to 9th Line (Zone O4) (Construction) OAK WM 400 mm 1500 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,470,000$ -$ -$ 1,470,000$ 1,087,800$ 382,200$ -$ 1,470,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Annualized Funding Requirements
Capacity
Total Capacity
Benefit to Existing (2012$)
Oversizing (2012$)
DC (2012$) Res (2012$) Non-Res (2012$)Base Cost
(2012$)
Additional Costs
(2012$)
Subtotal(2012$)
Contingency/ Engineering
(2012$)
Non-Rebatable HST
(2012$)
Total Estimated Cost (2012$)
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
Table 18 ‐ Water Capital Program
Region IPFS ID
Project Description Municipality Project Type Size/Capacity Length 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Annualized Funding RequirementsBenefit to
Existing (2012$)Oversizing
(2012$)DC (2012$) Res (2012$) Non-Res (2012$)
Base Cost(2012$)
Additional Costs
(2012$)
Subtotal(2012$)
Contingency/ Engineering
(2012$)
Non-Rebatable HST
(2012$)
Total Estimated Cost (2012$)
6376 400mm WM east/west on Dundas St from 8th Line to new North Oakville road (Zone O4) (Construction) OAK WM 400 mm 552 m 387,420$ 1,512,580$ 1,900,000$ -$ -$ 1,900,000$ -$ -$ 1,900,000$ 1,406,000$ 494,000$ -$ 1,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6398600 mm WM on re-aligned Tremaine Rd from Steeles Avenue to existing watermain on Peru Rd south of Hwy 401 (Zone M5L)
MIL WM 600 mm 1130 m 1,112,530$ 1,588,671$ 2,701,201$ 4,139,372$ 59,426$ 6,900,000$ -$ -$ 6,900,000$ 5,106,000$ 1,794,000$ 1,380,000$ -$ 5,520,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6443 400 mm WM on Burnhamthorpe Rd from Trafalgar Rd to new North Oakville road (Zone O4) (Construction) OAK WM 400 mm 1359 m 953,090$ 609,798$ 1,562,889$ 234,854$ 30,258$ 1,828,000$ -$ -$ 1,828,000$ 1,352,720$ 475,280$ -$ -$ -$ 1,828,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6444 400 mm WM from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Dundas St on new North Oakville road (Zone O4) (Construction) OAK WM 400 mm 2101 m 1,473,716$ 620,211$ 2,093,926$ 314,535$ 40,538$ 2,449,000$ -$ -$ 2,449,000$ 1,812,260$ 636,740$ -$ -$ 2,449,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6597 300 mm WM on Reg Rd 25 from new well connection to 640 m North of Wallace St (Zone A9G) HHACT WM 300 mm 959 m 622,317$ 156,600$ 778,917$ 272,947$ 17,136$ 1,069,000$ -$ -$ 1,069,000$ 791,060$ 277,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 213,800$ 855,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6598 300 mm WM from New Well to Reg Rd 25 (Zone A9G) HHACT WM 300 mm 480 m 311,410$ 11,928$ 323,339$ 113,548$ 7,113$ 444,000$ -$ -$ 444,000$ 328,560$ 115,440$ -$ -$ -$ 88,800$ -$ 355,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6600300 mm WM on Reg Rd 25 from new well connection to No. 32 Siderd and on No. 32 Siderd from Reg Rd 25 to 3rd Line Reservoir (Zone A9G)
HHACT WM 300 mm 1841 m 1,194,682$ 32,444$ 1,227,126$ 429,877$ 26,997$ 1,684,000$ -$ -$ 1,684,000$ 1,246,160$ 437,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 336,800$ 1,347,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6603 400 mm WM on 8th Line from 10th Siderd to existing 400 mm (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 400 mm 1200 m 841,736$ 340,997$ 1,182,733$ 414,247$ 26,020$ 1,623,000$ -$ -$ 1,623,000$ 1,201,020$ 421,980$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 324,600$ 1,298,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6604150mm WM on 3rd Line from 3rd Line Reservoir to No. 32 Siderd and on No. 32 Siderd from 3rd Line to 950 m easterly (Zone A9G)
HHACT WM 150 mm 950 m 473,569$ 52,003$ 525,572$ 183,866$ 11,563$ 721,000$ -$ -$ 721,000$ 533,540$ 187,460$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 144,200$ 576,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6608 750 mm WM on Trafalgar from 15th Siderd to 22nd Siderd Lake Based Reservoir (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 4300 m 5,587,955$ 3,282,427$ 8,870,382$ 3,104,470$ 195,148$ 12,170,000$ -$ -$ 12,170,000$ 9,005,800$ 3,164,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,434,000$ 9,736,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6609 400 mm WM on 17th Siderd from Trafalgar Rd to Main St (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 400 mm 1323 m 928,076$ 342,723$ 1,270,799$ 445,243$ 27,958$ 1,744,000$ -$ -$ 1,744,000$ 1,290,560$ 453,440$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 348,800$ 1,395,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6610 600 mm WM on 10th Siderd from Trafalgar Rd to 8th Line (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1408 m 1,386,013$ 465,591$ 1,851,604$ 647,660$ 40,735$ 2,540,000$ -$ -$ 2,540,000$ 1,879,600$ 660,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 508,000$ 2,032,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6611 600 mm WM on No 10 Siderd from 8th Line to 9th Line (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1440 m 1,417,325$ 466,218$ 1,883,542$ 659,020$ 41,438$ 2,584,000$ -$ -$ 2,584,000$ 1,912,160$ 671,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 516,800$ 2,067,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6612 600 mm WM on No 10 Siderd from 9th Line to 10th Line (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1398 m 1,376,655$ 845,688$ 2,222,343$ 777,766$ 48,892$ 3,049,000$ -$ -$ 3,049,000$ 2,256,260$ 792,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 609,800$ 2,439,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6613 600 mm WM on No 10 Siderd from 10th Line to Adamson St S (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 673 m 662,720$ 431,930$ 1,094,650$ 383,268$ 24,082$ 1,502,000$ -$ -$ 1,502,000$ 1,111,480$ 390,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,400$ 1,201,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6614 600 mm WM on Adamson St from 10th Siderd to Guelph St and on Guelph St from Adamson St to 10th Siderd (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1241 m 1,221,854$ 592,024$ 1,813,879$ 635,216$ 39,905$ 2,489,000$ -$ -$ 2,489,000$ 1,841,860$ 647,140$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 497,800$ 1,991,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6615 600 mm WM on No 10 Siderd from Guelph St to Bovaird Dr (Region of Peel) (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1280 m 1,260,224$ 82,792$ 1,343,016$ 470,438$ 29,546$ 1,843,000$ -$ -$ 1,843,000$ 1,363,820$ 479,180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 368,600$ 1,474,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6616 400 mm WM on Thompson Rd South from Britannia Rd to approx. 1,156 south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1211 m 849,124$ 341,144$ 1,190,268$ 416,546$ 26,186$ 1,633,000$ -$ -$ 1,633,000$ 1,208,420$ 424,580$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 326,600$ 1,306,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6617 400 mm WM on new roadway south of Britannia Rd from Thompson Rd South to 4th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1345 m 943,716$ 609,611$ 1,553,326$ 543,500$ 34,173$ 2,131,000$ -$ -$ 2,131,000$ 1,576,940$ 554,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 426,200$ 1,704,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6618 400 mm WM on new roadway south of Britannia Rd from 4th Line to 5th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1379 m 967,099$ 610,078$ 1,577,177$ 552,125$ 34,698$ 2,164,000$ -$ -$ 2,164,000$ 1,601,360$ 562,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 432,800$ 1,731,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6619 400 mm WM on new roadway south of Britannia Rd fom 5th Line to 6th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1405 m 985,595$ 77,299$ 1,062,894$ 371,722$ 23,384$ 1,458,000$ -$ -$ 1,458,000$ 1,078,920$ 379,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 291,600$ 1,166,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6620 400 mm WM on 6th Line from Britannia Rd to 600 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 600 m 420,985$ 313,386$ 734,370$ 257,474$ 16,156$ 1,008,000$ -$ -$ 1,008,000$ 745,920$ 262,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 201,600$ 806,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6621 400 mm WM on 6th Line from Britannia Rd to 1,500 m north (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1503 m 1,054,313$ 829,201$ 1,883,515$ 659,048$ 41,437$ 2,584,000$ -$ -$ 2,584,000$ 1,912,160$ 671,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 516,800$ 2,067,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6622 400 mm WM on 6th Line from Derry Rd to new Rd 1,500 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1600 m 1,122,564$ 1,146,337$ 2,268,901$ 794,183$ 49,916$ 3,113,000$ -$ -$ 3,113,000$ 2,303,620$ 809,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 622,600$ 2,490,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6623 400 mm WM on 5th Line from Britannia Rd to 1,500 m north of Britannia Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1484 m 1,041,296$ 344,988$ 1,386,284$ 485,218$ 30,498$ 1,902,000$ -$ -$ 1,902,000$ 1,407,480$ 494,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 380,400$ 1,521,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6624 400 mm WM on 4th Line from Britannia Rd to 650 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 636 m 446,266$ 47,317$ 493,583$ 172,558$ 10,859$ 677,000$ -$ -$ 677,000$ 500,980$ 176,020$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 135,400$ 541,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6625 400 mm WM on Lower Base Line (East) from 4th Line to 5th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1387 m 972,748$ 876,766$ 1,849,514$ 647,796$ 40,689$ 2,538,000$ -$ -$ 2,538,000$ 1,878,120$ 659,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 507,600$ 2,030,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6626 400 mm WM on 5th Line from Britannia Rd to 650 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 648 m 454,258$ 47,477$ 501,734$ 175,228$ 11,038$ 688,000$ -$ -$ 688,000$ 509,120$ 178,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 137,600$ 550,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6627 400 mm WM on 4th Line from 650 m south of Britannia Rd to Lower Base Line (West) (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1759 m 1,234,139$ 348,845$ 1,582,983$ 554,191$ 34,826$ 2,172,000$ -$ -$ 2,172,000$ 1,607,280$ 564,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 434,400$ 1,737,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6628 400 mm WM on 5th Line from 650 m south of Britannia Rd to Lower Base Line (West) (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1738 m 1,219,177$ 881,694$ 2,100,871$ 734,910$ 46,219$ 2,882,000$ -$ -$ 2,882,000$ 2,132,680$ 749,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 576,400$ 2,305,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6629 600 mm WM on Louis St. Laurent Ave from 5th Line to 6th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 600 mm 1363 m 1,342,371$ 464,719$ 1,807,090$ 632,155$ 39,756$ 2,479,000$ -$ -$ 2,479,000$ 1,834,460$ 644,540$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 495,800$ 1,983,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6630 600 mm WM on Louis St. Laurent Ave from 6th Line toTrafalgar Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 600 mm 1386 m 1,364,985$ 1,606,022$ 2,971,007$ 1,039,631$ 65,362$ 4,076,000$ -$ -$ 4,076,000$ 3,016,240$ 1,059,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 815,200$ 3,260,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6631 400 mm WM on Louis St. Laurent Ave from Trafalgar Rd to 8th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1399 m 981,208$ 876,935$ 1,858,143$ 649,978$ 40,879$ 2,549,000$ -$ -$ 2,549,000$ 1,886,260$ 662,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 509,800$ 2,039,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6632 400 mm WM on Britannia Rd from Trafalgar Rd to 600 m east (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 595 m 417,308$ 313,312$ 730,620$ 255,306$ 16,074$ 1,002,000$ -$ -$ 1,002,000$ 741,480$ 260,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,400$ 801,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6633 400 mm WM on Britannia Rd from 600 m east of Trafalgar Rd to 8th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 685 m 480,667$ 314,579$ 795,246$ 278,258$ 17,495$ 1,091,000$ -$ -$ 1,091,000$ 807,340$ 283,660$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 218,200$ 872,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6634 400 mm WM on new Milton Rd from Trafalgar Rd to approximately 700 m east (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 698 m 489,325$ 581,327$ 1,070,652$ 374,793$ 23,554$ 1,469,000$ -$ -$ 1,469,000$ 1,087,060$ 381,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 293,800$ 1,175,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6635 400 mm WM on 8th Line from Derry Rd. to approximately 1,600 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1610 m 1,129,174$ 879,894$ 2,009,068$ 702,732$ 44,199$ 2,756,000$ -$ -$ 2,756,000$ 2,039,440$ 716,560$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 551,200$ 2,204,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6636 400 mm WM on 8th Line from Britannia Rd to approximately 1,500 m north (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1471 m 1,031,622$ 562,173$ 1,593,795$ 558,142$ 35,063$ 2,187,000$ -$ -$ 2,187,000$ 1,618,380$ 568,620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 437,400$ 1,749,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6637 400 mm WM on new roadway from Britannia Rd to approx. 1,200 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1146 m 803,867$ 340,239$ 1,144,106$ 400,724$ 25,170$ 1,570,000$ -$ -$ 1,570,000$ 1,161,800$ 408,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 314,000$ 1,256,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6638 400 mm WM on Derry Rd from Trafalgar Rd to 500 m east (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 505 m 353,938$ 45,470$ 399,408$ 139,805$ 8,787$ 548,000$ -$ -$ 548,000$ 405,520$ 142,480$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 109,600$ 438,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6639 400 mm WM on Derry Rd from 600 m east of Trafalgar Rd to 8th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 843 m 591,661$ 50,225$ 641,886$ 224,992$ 14,121$ 881,000$ -$ -$ 881,000$ 651,940$ 229,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 176,200$ 704,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6640 600 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from Zone 4 Reservoir to 600 mm Zone M5L WM on Steeles Avenue (ID 3844) (Zone M5L) MIL WM 600 mm 3199 m 3,149,520$ 1,561,224$ 4,710,744$ 1,648,620$ 103,636$ 6,463,000$ -$ -$ 6,463,000$ 4,782,620$ 1,680,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,292,600$ 5,170,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6641 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles Ave parallel to Hornby Rd (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 374 m 262,139$ 527,588$ 789,727$ 276,899$ 17,374$ 1,084,000$ -$ -$ 1,084,000$ 802,160$ 281,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 216,800$ 867,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6642 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles from Hornby Rd to Trafalgar Rd (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 926 m 649,523$ 584,531$ 1,234,055$ 431,796$ 27,149$ 1,693,000$ -$ -$ 1,693,000$ 1,252,820$ 440,180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 338,600$ 1,354,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6643400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles from Trafalgar Rd to approximately 400m east of 8th Line (Zone M5L)
HH401 WM 400 mm 1013 m 710,758$ 1,088,905$ 1,799,663$ 629,745$ 39,593$ 2,469,000$ -$ -$ 2,469,000$ 1,827,060$ 641,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 493,800$ 1,975,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6644 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor from Steeles Ave to approximately 300 m north (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 357 m 250,316$ 527,351$ 777,667$ 272,224$ 17,109$ 1,067,000$ -$ -$ 1,067,000$ 789,580$ 277,420$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 213,400$ 853,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6645400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles Ave. from 1,000 m west of 9th Line to 900 m east of 9th Line (Zone M5L)
HH401 WM 400 mm 1759 m 1,233,749$ 82,262$ 1,316,011$ 461,036$ 28,952$ 1,806,000$ -$ -$ 1,806,000$ 1,336,440$ 469,560$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 361,200$ 1,444,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6646 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor from Steeles Ave to approximately 330 m north (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 327 m 229,543$ 526,936$ 756,479$ 264,879$ 16,643$ 1,038,000$ -$ -$ 1,038,000$ 768,120$ 269,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 207,600$ 830,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6647400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles Ave. from 600 m west of 10th Line to 1,000 m east of 10th Line (Zone M5L)
HH401 WM 400 mm 1582 m 1,109,985$ 346,362$ 1,456,347$ 509,614$ 32,040$ 1,998,000$ -$ -$ 1,998,000$ 1,478,520$ 519,480$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 399,600$ 1,598,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6648 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor from Steeles Ave to 340 m north (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 338 m 237,127$ 793,662$ 1,030,789$ 360,534$ 22,677$ 1,414,000$ -$ -$ 1,414,000$ 1,046,360$ 367,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 282,800$ 1,131,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6649 400 mm WM on Esquesing Line from James Snow Parkway to approximately 800 m north (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 784 m 549,876$ 315,964$ 865,839$ 303,112$ 19,048$ 1,188,000$ -$ -$ 1,188,000$ 879,120$ 308,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 237,600$ 950,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6650 400 mm WM on new roadway from Esquesing Line to Boston Church Rd (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 1669 m 1,171,062$ 614,158$ 1,785,220$ 624,505$ 39,275$ 2,449,000$ -$ -$ 2,449,000$ 1,812,260$ 636,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 489,800$ 1,959,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6651 400 mm WM on new roadway from Boston Church Rd to approximately 360 m west (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 813 m 570,276$ 316,372$ 886,648$ 309,846$ 19,506$ 1,216,000$ -$ -$ 1,216,000$ 899,840$ 316,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 243,200$ 972,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6652 400 mm WM on new roadway from 360 m west of Boston Church Rd to No 5 Siderd (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 695 m 487,501$ 314,716$ 802,217$ 281,134$ 17,649$ 1,101,000$ -$ -$ 1,101,000$ 814,740$ 286,260$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,200$ 880,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6653 400 mm WM on No 5 Siderd from approximately 400 m west of 3rd Line to 3rd Line (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 390 m 273,553$ 43,863$ 317,415$ 110,602$ 6,983$ 435,000$ -$ -$ 435,000$ 321,900$ 113,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 87,000$ 348,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6654 750 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from 10th Siderd to approximately 1,700 m north of 10th Siderd (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 1658 m 2,154,471$ 588,248$ 2,742,719$ 959,942$ 60,340$ 3,763,000$ -$ -$ 3,763,000$ 2,784,620$ 978,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 752,600$ 3,010,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6655 750 mm WM on Trafalgar from 1,700 m north of 10th Siderd to 15th Siderd (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 1444 m 1,877,281$ 582,704$ 2,459,984$ 860,896$ 54,120$ 3,375,000$ -$ -$ 3,375,000$ 2,497,500$ 877,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 675,000$ 2,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6656 400 mm WM on Britannia Rd from Tremaine Rd to approximately 700 m east (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 712 m 499,768$ 314,961$ 814,729$ 285,347$ 17,924$ 1,118,000$ -$ -$ 1,118,000$ 827,320$ 290,680$ 223,600$ 894,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6657 400 mm WM on Tremaine Rd from 1,000 m south of Britannia Rd to 2,200 m south of Britannia Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1234 m 865,587$ 608,048$ 1,473,635$ 515,945$ 32,420$ 2,022,000$ -$ -$ 2,022,000$ 1,496,280$ 525,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 404,400$ 1,617,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6658 400 mm WM on Tremaine Rd from Britannia Rd to 1,000 m south of Britannia Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 974 m 683,332$ 318,633$ 1,001,964$ 350,993$ 22,043$ 1,375,000$ -$ -$ 1,375,000$ 1,017,500$ 357,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 275,000$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6659 400 mm WM on new road alignment from Tremaine Rd to approximately 360 m west (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 392 m 274,819$ 43,888$ 318,707$ 111,281$ 7,012$ 437,000$ -$ -$ 437,000$ 323,380$ 113,620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 87,400$ 349,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6660 400 mm WM on Tremaine Rd from Louis St Laurent to Britannia Rd West (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1670 m 1,171,474$ 81,017$ 1,252,490$ 437,955$ 27,555$ 1,718,000$ -$ -$ 1,718,000$ 1,271,320$ 446,680$ 343,600$ 1,374,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6662 400 mm WM on Wyecroft Rd from Burloak Dr to 3rd Line (Zone O2) OAK WM 400 mm 4548 m 3,189,863$ 4,808,077$ 7,997,940$ 2,799,105$ 175,955$ 10,973,000$ -$ -$ 10,973,000$ 8,120,020$ 2,852,980$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,194,600$ 8,778,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6664Relining of Walkers Line Well Feedermain with 150mm pipe within existing easement from West Appleby Line to Surge Tank (Zone M5L)
MIL WM 150 mm 750 m 150,000$ 7,772$ 157,772$ 54,757$ 3,471$ 216,000$ -$ -$ 216,000$ 159,840$ 56,160$ -$ -$ 43,200$ 172,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6666 750 mm WM on James Snow Parkway from Burnhamthorpe Rd W to Lower Base Line W (Zone M4) MIL WM 750 mm 2667 m 3,465,929$ 2,464,326$ 5,930,255$ 2,075,279$ 130,466$ 8,136,000$ -$ 7,322,000$ 814,000$ 602,360$ 211,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,627,200$ -$ 6,508,800$ -$ -$
6667 Lake Based Servicing Transfer (Zone M5L) MIL WM 300 mm 1100 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,165,000$ -$ -$ 3,165,000$ 2,342,100$ 822,900$ 633,000$ 2,532,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6688 400 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from Steeles Avenue to Hwy 401 (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 327 m 229,642$ 42,984$ 272,627$ 95,375$ 5,998$ 374,000$ -$ -$ 374,000$ 276,760$ 97,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 74,800$ 299,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6689 400 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd Hwy 401 Crossing (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 290 m 203,180$ 1,856,613$ 2,059,793$ 720,892$ 45,315$ 2,826,000$ -$ -$ 2,826,000$ 2,091,240$ 734,760$ 565,200$ -$ 2,260,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6690 400 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from Hwy 401 to Main St Extension (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 792 m 555,803$ 316,082$ 871,885$ 304,933$ 19,181$ 1,196,000$ -$ -$ 1,196,000$ 885,040$ 310,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 239,200$ 956,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6691 400 mm WM on Main St extension from Trafalgar Rd (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 820 m 574,975$ 800,419$ 1,375,394$ 481,348$ 30,259$ 1,887,000$ -$ -$ 1,887,000$ 1,396,380$ 490,620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 377,400$ 1,509,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
Table 18 ‐ Water Capital Program
Region IPFS ID
Project Description Municipality Project Type Size/Capacity Length 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Annualized Funding RequirementsBenefit to
Existing (2012$)Oversizing
(2012$)DC (2012$) Res (2012$) Non-Res (2012$)
Base Cost(2012$)
Additional Costs
(2012$)
Subtotal(2012$)
Contingency/ Engineering
(2012$)
Non-Rebatable HST
(2012$)
Total Estimated Cost (2012$)
6692 400 mm WM on Main St extension from 5th Line to approximately 2,100 m east (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 2095 m 1,469,719$ 1,419,854$ 2,889,574$ 1,010,856$ 63,571$ 3,964,000$ -$ -$ 3,964,000$ 2,933,360$ 1,030,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 792,800$ 3,171,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6694 10 ML Zone G6L Storage at 22nd Siderd HHGEO RES. 10.0 ML 7,400,000$ 548,000$ 7,948,000$ 2,782,144$ 174,856$ 10,905,000$ -$ -$ 10,905,000$ 8,069,700$ 2,835,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,181,000$ 8,724,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6696 20 ML/d Zone M5L pumping station at Zone M4L Reservoir HHGEO P.S. 20.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 1,480,000$ 520,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6697 20 ML storage expansion at Zone M4 Resevoir HHGEO RES. 20.0 ML 14,800,000$ 296,000$ 15,096,000$ 5,283,888$ 332,112$ 20,712,000$ -$ -$ 20,712,000$ 15,326,880$ 5,385,120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,142,400$ 16,569,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6698 10 ML storage expansion at Zone M5L Reservoir MIL RES. 10.0 ML 7,400,000$ 148,000$ 7,548,000$ 2,641,944$ 166,056$ 10,356,000$ -$ -$ 10,356,000$ 7,663,440$ 2,692,560$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,071,200$ 8,284,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6701 Kitchen Zone O3 Pumping Station expansion by 80 ML/d BUR P.S. 80 ML/d 6,482,000$ 129,640$ 6,611,640$ 5,242,904$ 145,456$ 12,000,000$ -$ 8,040,000$ 3,960,000$ 2,930,400$ 1,029,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,400,000$ 9,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6702 40 ML/d expansion at the North Oakville Zone O4 Pumping Station (existing site) OAK P.S. 40.0 ML/d 3,241,000$ 64,820$ 3,305,820$ 1,157,452$ 72,728$ 4,536,000$ -$ -$ 4,536,000$ 3,356,640$ 1,179,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 907,200$ 3,628,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6863 Waterdown Road Pumping Station Expansion (Zones B2, B3A & B5A) BUR P.S. 3,837,534$ -$ 3,837,534$ 1,343,040$ 84,426$ 5,265,000$ -$ -$ 5,265,000$ 3,896,100$ 1,368,900$ -$ 1,053,000$ 4,212,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
376,506,000$ 815,000$ 35,485,000$ 340,206,000$ 251,752,440$ 88,453,560$ 12,892,200$ 42,191,200$ 75,103,000$ 11,276,200$ 31,075,200$ 4,438,200$ 12,961,600$ 13,590,400$ 11,239,600$ 53,555,200$ 37,709,600$ 17,403,000$ 18,983,000$ 10,884,400$ 5,467,200$ 11,227,200$ -$ 6,508,800$ -$ -$
6601 7.8 ML/d expansion at Beaufort Pumping Station (new site) (Zone B5) BUR P.S. 90.0 l/s 1,440,000$ 28,800$ 1,468,800$ 513,886$ 32,314$ 2,015,000$ 1,856,000$ -$ 159,000$ 108,120$ 50,880$ -$ 403,000$ 1,612,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6602 7.5 ML storage expansion at Waterdown Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B1A) BUR RES. 7.5 ML 5,550,000$ 111,000$ 5,661,000$ 1,981,458$ 124,542$ 7,767,000$ 7,154,000$ -$ 613,000$ 416,840$ 196,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,553,400$ 6,213,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6663 400 mm WM from 9th Line on easement to Bristol Circle (Zone O3) OAK WM 400 mm 900 m 631,302$ 1,561,222$ 2,192,524$ 767,240$ 48,236$ 3,008,000$ 2,707,000$ -$ 301,000$ 204,680$ 96,320$ 781,600$ -$ 2,226,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6665 400 mm WM between Tyandanga Reservoir and Beaufort Reservoir (Zone B4) BUR WM 400 mm 2752 m 1,930,433$ 2,881,712$ 4,812,146$ 1,683,987$ 105,867$ 6,602,000$ 6,081,000$ -$ 521,000$ 354,280$ 166,720$ 1,620,400$ -$ 4,981,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6669 4.5 ML storage expansion at Tyandanga Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B3) BUR RES. 4.5 ML 3,330,000$ 66,600$ 3,396,600$ 1,188,675$ 74,725$ 4,660,000$ 4,292,000$ -$ 368,000$ 250,240$ 117,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 932,000$ 3,728,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6670 2.5 ML storage expansion at Beaufort Reservoir Expansion (new site) (Zone B4) BUR RES. 2.5 ML 1,850,000$ 537,000$ 2,387,000$ 835,486$ 52,514$ 3,275,000$ 3,016,000$ -$ 259,000$ 176,120$ 82,880$ 500,000$ 655,000$ 2,120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6671 6.6 ML/d expansion at Brant St Pumping Station (existing building) (Zone B3) BUR P.S. 6.6 ML/d 525,000$ 10,500$ 535,500$ 187,719$ 11,781$ 735,000$ 677,000$ -$ 58,000$ 39,440$ 18,560$ 147,000$ 588,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6672 11.5 ML storage expansion at Brant St Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B1) BUR RES. 11.5 ML 8,510,000$ 470,200$ 8,980,200$ 3,143,236$ 197,564$ 12,321,000$ 11,348,000$ -$ 973,000$ 661,640$ 311,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,464,200$ 9,856,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6673 5.5 ML storage expansion at Mount Forest Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B1) BUR RES. 5.5 ML 4,070,000$ 81,400$ 4,151,400$ 1,453,269$ 91,331$ 5,696,000$ 5,246,000$ -$ 450,000$ 306,000$ 144,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,139,200$ 4,556,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6674 13.5 ML storage expansion at Washburn Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B1) BUR RES. 13.5 ML 9,990,000$ 199,800$ 10,189,800$ 3,566,024$ 224,176$ 13,980,000$ 11,464,000$ -$ 2,516,000$ 1,710,880$ 805,120$ 2,796,000$ 11,184,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6704 200 mm WM on Brock Ave from Elgin Street to Lakeshore Rd BUR WM 200 mm 212 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ 325,000$ 221,000$ 104,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6705 200 mm WM on Regina Drive from Maple Avenue to Ecole Renaissance Schoolyard BUR WM 200 mm 176 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 271,000$ -$ -$ 271,000$ 184,280$ 86,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 271,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6706 250 mm WM on Bellview Rd from Maple Avenue to end BUR WM 250 mm 114 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 309,000$ -$ -$ 309,000$ 210,120$ 98,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 309,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6707 300 mm WM on Lakeshore Rd between Nelson Avenue and Burlington Avenue BUR WM 300 mm 229 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 869,000$ -$ -$ 869,000$ 590,920$ 278,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 869,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6708 300 mm WM on Elizabeth Street from James Street to approximately 15 m north BUR WM 300 mm 15 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 23,800$ 11,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6709 300 mm WM on Plains Rd East from north of Grandview Rd to twinned section on Plains BUR WM 300 mm 982 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,678,000$ -$ -$ 2,678,000$ 1,821,040$ 856,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,678,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6710 300 mm WM on Plains Road East (Twinning adjacent to 6709) BUR WM 300 mm 340 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 628,000$ -$ -$ 628,000$ 427,040$ 200,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 628,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6711 300 mm WM on Birchwood Avenue from Plains Rd East southwards towards Fairwood Place East BUR WM 300 mm 53 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ -$ 104,000$ 70,720$ 33,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6712 300 mm WM on Gallagher Rd from Plains Rd East to 160 m Northerly BUR WM 300 mm 127 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 239,000$ -$ -$ 239,000$ 162,520$ 76,480$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 239,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6713 300 mm WM on Downsview Rd from Plains Rd East to Dowland Crescent BUR WM 200 mm 53 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 223,000$ -$ -$ 223,000$ 151,640$ 71,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 223,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6714 300 mm WM on Brant from Fairview St to 180 m northerly BUR WM 300 mm 183 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 342,000$ -$ -$ 342,000$ 232,560$ 109,440$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 342,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6715 300 mm WM on Woodview Rd from Fairview Street to 100 m Northerly BUR WM 300 mm 96 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 181,000$ -$ -$ 181,000$ 123,080$ 57,920$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 181,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6716 200 mm WM from end of Commerce Court north to Fairview Street BUR WM 200 mm 96 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 268,000$ -$ -$ 268,000$ 182,240$ 85,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 268,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6717 300 mm WM on Fairview from Appleby to Taylor Crescent BUR WM 300 mm 377 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,137,000$ -$ -$ 1,137,000$ 773,160$ 363,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,137,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6718 300 mm WM on Oval Crescent heading due north from Fairview Street BUR WM 300 mm 137 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 170,000$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6719300 mm WM on Main St. from Ontario St. to Easement, on Easement from Main St. to Nipissing Rd and on Nipissing Rd from Easement to 251 Nipissing Rd.
MIL WM 300 mm 1034 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,335,000$ -$ -$ 2,335,000$ 1,587,800$ 747,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,335,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6720 300 mm WM on Childs Drive from Ontario Street North to Robertson Crescent (Eastern entrance) MIL WM 300 mm 951 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,716,000$ -$ -$ 1,716,000$ 1,166,880$ 549,120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,716,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6721 300 mm WM on Ontario Street North from Main Street East to Parkway Drive East MIL WM 300 mm 980 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,787,000$ -$ -$ 1,787,000$ 1,215,160$ 571,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,787,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6722 300 mm WM on Woodward Avenue between Martin Steet and Ontario Street North MIL WM 300 mm 703 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,919,000$ -$ -$ 1,919,000$ 1,304,920$ 614,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,919,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6723 400 mm WM on Bronte St between Main Street West and Barton Street MIL WM 400 mm 551 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,134,000$ -$ -$ 1,134,000$ 771,120$ 362,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,134,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6724 300 mm WM on Main Street East East between James Street and Martin Street MIL WM 300 mm 292 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 538,000$ -$ -$ 538,000$ 365,840$ 172,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 538,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6725 300 mm WM on Laurier Avenue between Bronte Street and Commercial Street MIL WM 300 mm 1003 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,278,000$ -$ -$ 2,278,000$ 1,549,040$ 728,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,278,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6726 300 mm WM on Sovereign between Bronte Rd and East Street OAK WM 300 mm 721 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,652,000$ -$ -$ 2,652,000$ 1,803,360$ 848,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,652,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6727 300 mm WM on Ontario/East Street between Bronte Rd and Marine Drive OAK WM 300 mm 640 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,060,000$ -$ -$ 2,060,000$ 1,400,800$ 659,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,060,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6728 300 mm WM on Cowan Between Kerr Street and Inglewood Drive OAK WM 300 mm 87 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,000$ -$ -$ 611,000$ 415,480$ 195,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6729 300 mm WM on Deane between Kerr Street and Felan Ave OAK WM 300 mm 291 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 981,000$ -$ -$ 981,000$ 667,080$ 313,920$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 981,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6730 300 mm WM on Normandy between Kerr Street and Queen Mary Drive OAK WM 300 mm 354 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 651,000$ -$ -$ 651,000$ 442,680$ 208,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 651,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6731 300 mm WM on Forsythe between Rebecca Street and Burnet Street OAK WM 300 mm 315 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 577,000$ -$ -$ 577,000$ 392,360$ 184,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 577,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6732 300 mm replacement on Easement from Rosetta Street to Victoria Street HHGEO WM 300 mm 275 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 507,000$ -$ -$ 507,000$ 344,760$ 162,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 507,000$ -$ -$ -$
6733 300 mm replacement on Cross Street from Guelph Street to Main Street HHGEO WM 300 mm 113 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 136,000$ 64,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$
6734 300 mm in Trafalgar Road between Thompson Drive and Stewartown Rd HHGEO WM 300 mm 230 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 426,000$ -$ -$ 426,000$ 289,680$ 136,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 426,000$ -$
6735 300 mm replacement on Guelph Street between Mountainview Rd North and Sinclair Ave HHGEO WM 300 mm 788 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,424,000$ -$ -$ 1,424,000$ 968,320$ 455,680$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,424,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total Distribution - Built Boundary 89,714,000$ 53,841,000$ -$ 35,873,000$ 24,393,640$ 11,479,360$ 5,845,000$ 12,830,000$ 10,940,000$ -$ 3,306,000$ 10,994,800$ 28,261,200$ 3,728,000$ 342,000$ 2,741,000$ 3,957,000$ -$ 2,816,000$ -$ 1,592,000$ 1,228,000$ 507,000$ 200,000$ 426,000$ -$
957,213,000$ 103,534,000$ 124,347,000$ 729,332,000$ 530,488,240$ 198,843,760$ 117,171,600$ 71,571,000$ 186,089,400$ 40,514,200$ 162,598,600$ 25,888,000$ 50,355,000$ 22,782,200$ 12,911,600$ 57,924,200$ 42,084,800$ 30,594,800$ 21,909,000$ 10,994,400$ 83,177,200$ 12,565,200$ 617,000$ 6,818,800$ 536,000$ 110,000$ TOTAL
Distribution - Built Boundary
Total Distribution - Greenfield
6608
6662
6664
6603
6605
6666
6661
6640
6616
6660
6628
6627
6600
6607
6665
66116615
6635
6622
6606
66106612
6597
6621
6609
6692
6623 66
366619
6631
6625
6634
6630
6618
6629
6617
6645
6654
6637
6647
6655
6690
6650
6657
6614
6656
6613
6643
6658
6633
6642
6626
6624
6639
6620
6632
6691
6598
6652
6659
6638
6667
6653
6688
6663
6641
6651
6644
6648
6649
6646
6604
6689
6318
4985
5875
5868
5881
5867
5627
5632
5850
5860
5862
5870 58
76
5633
6362
3700
639837
86/63
65
5882
82
4976
/6364
4983
/6444
3812/6360
5855/6370
5883
5853
5857/6375
3713/6443
5934
/6368
5859/6376
4977
3837
4978
5880
3818
5927
5525
3844
5861
5526
5320
5948
5866
5863
5879
5321
5865
4979
5864
3846
5852
6374
5872
5634
5851/6366
5856
5533
5947
5926
5961
5873
5534
5322
5319
5949
4975
6721
6725
6709
6720
6719
6735
6726
6722
6723
6727
6717
67306710
6731
6724
6729
6732
6734
6707
6704
671467
13
6705
671867
12
6706
6733
67166715
6728
6711
6708
")
$+
H
")
#*#*
")
#*
$+
")
") ")
")
")
#*
#*")
H
$+
#*#*
$+
6670
6601
6671
6669
6602
66746672
6673
6699/6700/6770
6702
6698
6696
6693
6694
6695/6668
6697
6437/6590
97
6675
6680/6681/6682/6683/6684
6701
#*
#*
#*
#*
")
")
$+
#*
#*
")
H
$+
$+
H
")
H
$+H
54
59626863
64/6367
3817
4980
3699
5061
3838
3824/5951/6372
5935
5719
5720/5757/6440
57186435
5205/5716/5717
6439
")
")
")
")
")
") ")
")
")
!(
")
")")
")
")
^
^
")
")
!(
^
^
H
H
H
HH
H
H
H
HH
H
H
H
$+
$+
$+
$+
$+
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
$+
Moore Park PS
O-4 ET
Kelso PSKelso WPP
Burloak WPP
Kelso Well
Oakville WPP
4th Line Well
Todd Rd Tower
Georgetown WPP
Burlington WPP
Hufnagel Wells
Davidson Well
Cedarvale Well
Moore (O-3) Res
Baillie (B-4) PS
Kitchen (O-3) PS
Walker's Line PS
Lindsay Court Well
Norval Standpipe
Churchill Rd Res
Milton (M-5L) ET
Bailie (B-2) Res
8th Line (O-3) PS
Washburn (B-2) PS
Beaufort (B-5) PS
Tyandaga (B-4) PS
8th Line (O-4) PS
Washburn (B-3) PS
Prospect Park WPP
22nd Sideroad Res
Kitchen (O-1) Res
Davis Rd. (O-2) PS
Brant St. (B-3) PS
Kingsway (B-1A) PS
Beaufort (B-4) Res
McCraney (O-1) Res
Washburn (B-1) Res
Tyandaga (B-3) Res
8th Line (O-2) Res
Prospect Park Well
Walker's Line Well
Princess Anne Well
Brant St. (B-1) Res
Main St. (M-5G) Res
Campbellville Well
Waterdown (B-1B) PS
Headon Rd. (B-3) Res
Waterdown (B-1A) Res
Mount Forest (B-2) PSMount Forest (B-1) Res
Appleby Line (B-2) Res
Waterdown (B-1B) Standpipe
Burnhamthorpe Rd. Elevated Tank
Bra
nt
St
O3
M4L
M5L
O1
B1
O2B2
O4
B3
G6G
G6L
B1A
B4
M5G
A9G
M5L
B5
O2A
G5G
B3A
G7G
B5A
B4AB1B
B5B
B2QEW
Hwy 401
Hwy 7
Hwy 403
Hw
y 6
Guelph St
Guelph St W
QE
W
Hwy 403
Hwy 7
QE
W
Hwy 401
Hw
y 403
Hw
y 403
Six
th L
ine
No 15 Siderd
Wa
lke
r'S
Lin
e
Fift
h L
ine
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Se
con
d L
ine
No 32 Siderd
New St
No 5 Siderd
Tw
iss
Rd
No 25 Siderd
Du
blin
Lin
e
Rebecca St
Fairview St
North Service Rd
Mainway
Ten
th L
ine
Fir
st L
ine
Lakeshore Rd
Speers Rd
Kin
g R
d
Lakeshore Rd W
Main St E
Milb
uro
ug
h L
ine
Campbellville Rd
Ce
da
r S
pri
ng
s R
d
Ap
ple
by
Lin
e
Harvester Rd
No 10 Siderd
No 20 Siderd
Guelph St
Win
sto
n C
hu
rch
ill B
lvd
Cornwall Rd
Th
om
ps
on
Rd
S
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Ke
rr St
Upper Middle Rd
Britannia Rd
No 17 Siderd
No 1 Siderd
Lakeshore Rd E
Na
ssa
ga
we
ya-E
squ
es
ing
Tlin
e
Steeles Ave W
No 30 Siderd
Bra
nt
St
Th
ird
Lin
e
Mc
Niv
en
Rd
Colling Rd
North Service Rd W
Kilbride St
Plains Rd W
Be
ll S
cho
ol
Lin
e
Wa
terd
ow
n R
d
Kelso Rd
Fo
rd D
r
Ma
in S
t S
Nin
th L
ine
Gu
elp
h L
ine
No 3 Siderd
Pe
ru R
d
Lower Base Line E
Bro
nte
Rd
Mai
n S
t
Ma
ple Ave
Lower Base Line
No 14 Siderd
River Dr
Esq
ue
sin
g L
ine
Bu
rlo
ak
Dr
Plains Rd E
Blin
d L
ine
Na
ssa
ga
we
ya-P
us
chlin
ch T
line
Mo
un
tain
vie
w R
d S
No 2 Siderd
Royal Windsor Dr
Bo
sto
n C
hu
rch
Rd
North
Ser
vice R
d E
No 4 Siderd
Bro
nte
St
S
Ch
art
we
ll R
d
Ma
in S
t N
Mill St W
Main St W
On
tari
o S
t S
Wyecroft Rd
Clayhill Rd
Lower Base Line W
Ma
rtin
St
Mo
rris
on
Rd
Tra
falg
ar R
d
Fallbrook Trail
North Shore Blvd E
Co
nfe
de
rati
on
St
Nottinghill G
ate
Ma
ple
Gro
ve
Dr
No 8 Siderd
Auburn Rd
Reid Siderd
Kingsway Dr
No 22 Siderd
South Service Rd E
Re
yno
lds S
t
Ho
rnb
y R
d
Bro
nte
St
N
No 28 Siderd
Wildwood Rd
Industrial St
No 27 Siderd
Queen St
On
tari
o S
t N
Cre
ws
on
s L
ine
Burnhamthorpe Rd W
Britannia Rd W
Leighland Ave
South Service Rd W
Eas
tpor
t Dr
He
nd
ers
on
Rd
Tre
ma
ine
Rd
Th
om
ps
on
Rd
NC
hu
rch
ill R
d S
Cross Ave
Sh
erw
oo
d H
eig
hts
Dr
Ch
urc
hill
Rd
N
So
uth
Se
rvice R
d
Panin Rd
Queensway Dr
Glen Lawson Rd
Prince St
Fra
ser
Dr
No 12 Siderd
Se
ne
ca
Ave
Campbell Ave W
Iroquois Shore Rd
Josh
ua
s C
ree
k D
r
Sysc
on
Rd
South Sheridan Way
La
salle
Pa
rk R
d
Mountain Brow Rd
No 1 Siderd
Britannia Rd
Six
th L
ine
Britannia Rd
Ten
th L
ine
Campbellville Rd
Ap
ple
by
Lin
e
Th
ird
Lin
e
Fift
h L
ine
Third Line
No 30 Siderd
Six
th L
ine
No 3 Siderd
Lower Base Line W
South Service Rd W
Th
ird
Lin
e
No 17 Siderd
Milb
uro
ug
h L
ine
No 10 Siderd
Wa
lke
r'S
Lin
e
Be
ll S
cho
ol
Lin
e
No 20 Siderd
No 2 Siderd
Ma
in S
t S
South Service Rd E
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Th
ird
Lin
e
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Nin
th L
ine
South Service Rd
No 3 Siderd
No 2 Siderd
No 27 Siderd
Ten
th L
ine
Plains Rd E
Du
blin
Lin
e
Six
th L
ine
South Service Rd W
No 22 Siderd
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Milb
uro
ug
h L
ine
No 22 Siderd
Fift
h L
ine
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Map
le A
ve
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Fir
st L
ine
No 17 Siderd
Fift
h L
ine
Na
ssa
ga
we
ya-P
us
chlin
ch T
line
Eig
hth
Lin
e
No 17 Siderd
Wyecroft Rd
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Milb
uro
ug
h L
ine
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Steeles Ave W
No 1 Siderd
Na
ssa
ga
we
ya-P
us
chlin
ch T
line
Ten
th L
ine
First L
ine
Th
ird
Lin
e
Tra
falg
ar
Rd
Gu
elp
h L
ine
Tre
ma
ine
Rd
Ap
ple
by
Lin
e
Derry Rd
Re
g R
d 2
5
Dundas St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd W
Dundas St W
Nin
th L
ine
Britannia Rd W
Bro
nte
Rd
Dundas St E
Bra
nt
St
Do
rva
l Dr
Derry Rd E
No 10 Siderd
Upper Middle Rd E
Ford Dr
Win
sto
n C
hu
rch
ill B
lvd
No 20 Siderd
Upper Middle Rd W
Ne
yag
aw
a B
lvd
Britannia Rd E
Steeles Ave E
Maple Ave
Bu
rlo
ak
Dr
Burnhamthorpe Rd E
Burnhamthorpe Rd W
No 32 Siderd
Ma
rtin
St
Ma
in S
t S
Upper Middle Rd
Steeles Ave W
Ma
in S
t N
Fo
urt
h L
ine
James Snow Pky
Nin
th L
ine
Burnhamthorpe Rd W
Re
g R
d 2
5
Gu
elp
h L
ine
Re
g R
d 2
5
Win
sto
n C
hu
rch
ill B
lvd
Tra
falg
ar
Rd
Win
sto
n C
hu
rch
ill B
lvd
Hwy 407Hwy 407
Halton Preferred Water Servicing Strategy
LegendExisting Infrastructure
#* Water Pumping Station
H Water Well
!( Water Standpipe
") Water Reservoir
$+ Water Purification Plant
^ Elevated Water Tower
Existing Watermain
Watermain
Previously Approved Infrastructure
#* Water Pumping Station
H Water Well
$+ Water Purification Plant
") Water Reservoir
Proposed/Upgrade Infrastructure
#* Water Pumping Station
H Water Well
$+ Water Purification Plant
") Water Reservoir
Watermain
Distribution-Built Boundary Watermain
Funded Infrastructure
#* Water Pumping Station
") Water Reservoir
Funded Project - Watermain (2008 MP Projects)
Existing Milton Groundwater Servicing
Existing Central Milton Groundwater Service Area Boundary
Water Pressure Zones
Proposed Lake Base Service Area
Lake OntarioHamilton Harbour
August 20111:40,000
601140562-349-W
X
X
XX
X
X
X
³
Artificial Recharge6678/6679
Artificial Recharge6676/6677
XX Existing Interregional connections
New Interregional connections
PRV
2012 Development Charges UpdateFigure 11
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 47
6. Wastewater Servicing Requirements
6.1 Wastewater Service Areas
The service areas were reviewed for each project through determination of the project’s location as well as its relationship to the overall system operation. Evaluation of the planning data and ultimately the project requirements was completed through summarizing the wastewater flows for the following geographic areas:
Wastewater plant drainage areas (i.e., serviced by each of the WWTPs respectively in South Halton, Acton and Georgetown)
Localized catchment areas (i.e., serviced by pumping stations and trunk sewers)
Localized TSZs (i.e., serviced by local trunk sewers).
The wastewater drainage areas are depicted in Figure 12. As noted, the drainage areas are identified by the ultimate outlet being the WWTP. The drainage areas are generally defined by the topography naturally draining to the respective WWTP as well as the service areas pumped or directed to a gravity system ultimately flowing to the plant. As such, the drainage areas are identified as Skyway, Oakville Southeast, Oakville Southwest, Mid-Halton, Milton, Acton and Georgetown.
6.2 Wastewater Flow Projections Based on the BPE June 2011 and Design Criteria, the Halton Wastewater Flow Projections have been established and are summarized in Table 19.
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
#
#
#
##
#
##
Halton Hills
Milton
Oakville
Burlington
NS
Skyway
Mid Halton
Mid Halton
Milton
Oakvil le SE
Oakville SW
Halton Hills
Acton
Mid Halton
G Williams
QEW
Hwy 407
Hwy 401
Tra
falg
ar
Rd
Ap
ple
by L
ine
Six
th L
ine
No 15 Siderd
Wa
lker
'S L
ine
Tre
mai
ne
Rd
Gu
elp
h Li
ne
Fif t
h L
ine
Fou
rth
Lin
e
Se
cond
Lin
e
Hwy 7
Derry Rd
New St
Reg
Rd
25
No 5 Siderd
Twis
s R
d
Dundas St
No 25 Siderd
Dub
lin L
ine
Hwy 403
Bra
nt
St
Steeles Ave
Rebecca St
Fairview St
No 20 Siderd
North Service Rd
Bro
nte
Rd
Derry Rd W
Mainway
Ten
th L
ine
Firs
t L
ine
Lakeshore Rd
Milb
uro
ugh
Lin
e
Dundas St W
Guelph St
Speers Rd
Nin
th L
ine
Kin
g R
d
Lakeshore Rd W
Main St E
Win
sto
n C
hur
chill
Blv
d
Britannia Rd W
For
d D
r
Campbellville R d
Ced
ar S
prin
gs
Rd
Dundas St E
Upper Middle R d
Harvester Rd
Dorva
l Dr
No 10 Siderd
Cornwall Rd
Tho
mps
on R
d S
Hw
y 6
Derry Rd E
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Ke
rr St
Britannia Rd
No 17 Siderd
Upper Middle R d W
No 1 Siderd
Lakeshore Rd E
Upper Middle R d E
Nas
sag
awe
ya-E
squ
esin
g T
line
Steeles Ave W
No 30 Siderd
Bu
rloa
k D
r
Thi
rd L
ine
Ma
rtin
St
Mc
Niv
en R
d
Ney
ag
awa
Blv
d
Britannia Rd E
Steeles Ave E
Colling Rd
North Service Rd W
Kilbride St
Maple Ave
Plains Rd W
Be
ll S
cho
ol L
ine
Wa
terd
ow
n R
d
Kelso Rd
No 3 Siderd
Pe
ru R
d
Lower Base Line E
Main St
Lower Base Line
No 14 Siderd
River Dr
Burnhamthorpe Rd E
Esq
ues
ing
Lin
e
Plains Rd E
Blin
d L
ine
Nas
sag
awe
ya-P
usc
hlin
ch T
line
Mo
unt
ain
vie
w R
d S
No 32 Siderd
No 2 Siderd
Royal Windsor Dr
Bo
sto
n C
hurc
h R
d
North Service Rd E
No 4 Siderd
Bro
nte
St
S
Cha
rtw
ell
Rd
Ma
in S
t N
Mill St W
Main St W
On
tario
St S
Wyecroft Rd
Clayhill Rd
Lower Base Line W
Burnhamthorpe Rd W
Ma
in S
t S
Mo
rris
on R
d
Fallbrook Trail
North Shore Blvd E
Notting
hill G
ate
Ea
stp
ort
Dr
No 8 Siderd
Auburn Rd
Reid Siderd
No 22 Siderd
Reyn
old
s St
Hor
nby
Rd
Bron
te S
t N
No 28 Siderd
No 27 Siderd
Cre
wso
ns L
ine
South Service Rd W
Hen
ders
on
Rd
Tho
mps
on R
d N
Chu
rchill Rd
S
Cross Ave
South Service Rd
Miss
issaga
St
No 12 Siderd
Se
neca
Ave
Adam
son
St N
Campbell Ave W
James St
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Thi
rd L
ine
Hwy 407
QE
W
Reg
Rd
25
Steeles Ave W
Campbellville R d
Firs
t L
ine
No 2 Siderd
Milb
uro
ugh
Lin
e
Win
sto
n C
hur
chill
Blv
d
Hwy 7
Gu
elp
h Li
ne
Britannia Rd
Fift
h L
ine
No 27 Siderd
Thi
rd L
ine
No 10 Siderd
Fou
rth
Lin
e
Six
th L
ine
No 22 Siderd
Six
th L
ine
Bu
rloa
k D
r
Fif t
h L
ine
Ten
th L
ine
Reg
Rd
25
Thi
rd L
ine
Six
th L
ine
No 30 Siderd
Fou
rth
Lin
e
Hwy 403
No 32 Siderd
No 17 Siderd
No 22 Siderd
Thi
rd L
ine
Nas
sag
awe
ya-P
usc
hlin
ch T
line
Ma
in S
t S
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Wa
lker
'S L
ine
Be
ll S
cho
ol L
ine
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Win
sto
n C
hur
chill
Blv
d
Ma
in S
t S
Ma
in S
t N
Nin
th L
ine
Ten
th L
ine
Nin
th L
ine
Dub
lin L
ine
Hwy 401
Hw
y 403
Fou
rth
Lin
e
Eig
hth
Lin
e
QE
W
Tra
falg
ar
Rd
Eig
hth
Lin
e
No 2 SiderdTe
nth
Lin
e
Nin
th L
ine
No 17 Siderd
Britannia Rd
Plains Rd E
Hw
y 403
No 20 Siderd
No 1 Siderd
Firs
t L
ine
Britannia Rd W
Ma
ple A
ve
Fift
h L
ine
No 3 Siderd
Burnhamthorpe Rd W
Skyway WWTP
Mid-Halton WWTP
Oakville SW WWTP
Oakville SE WWTP
Norval
Acton WWTP
Milton WWTP
Georgetown WWTP
Sustainable Halton
³
1:180,000July 2011
File: 60114062-189-WW
Halton WastewaterFuture Drainage Areas
±Legend# Existing Wastewater Pumping Station
$ Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant
Existing Wastewater Sewer
Existing Forcemain
Study Area Boundary
Drainage AreaActon
Glenn Williams
Halton Hills
Mid Halton
Milton
Norval
Oakville SE
Oakville SW
Skyway
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 49
Table 19. Wastewater Flow Projections
DESIGN CRITERIA (Lpcd)
Residential 365
Industrial 410
Commercial 260
Institutional 135
Population Industrial
Employees
Commercial Employees
Institutional Employees
Drainage Area 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Acton 10,036 9,796 10,379 12,874 13,981 1,467 1,505 1,634 1,862 2,004 1,260 1,490 1,618 1,751 1,861 1,064 1,090 1,102 1,131 1,206
Georgetown 36,637 38,913 42,154 44,332 50,256 4,737 4,781 4,903 5,036 5,233 5,272 5,343 5,543 5,713 6,175 2,720 2,720 2,722 2,765 2,911
Milton 18,299 20,812 25,637 30,383 35,254 16,516 19,220 21,156 22,291 23,933 10,816 15,201 18,951 20,108 20,693 3,878 4,915 6,134 6,943 7,112
Mid Halton 144,998 198,724 248,462 294,470 335,549 7,127 13,783 23,490 33,495 46,048 17,349 26,982 37,858 45,201 55,859 10,819 13,305 17,132 21,796 23,840
Oakville SE 39,451 39,400 39,495 39,503 40,639 21,623 23,264 23,293 23,324 23,847 8,083 9,032 9,564 9,564 9,926 2,788 2,908 3,262 3,315 3,410
Oakville SW 52,137 55,107 61,713 67,813 72,742 15,477 15,503 15,530 15,570 16,140 14,256 16,190 17,577 18,090 19,782 3,875 4,038 4,265 4,347 4,596
Skyway 172,769 174,448 177,781 180,938 185,183 37,608 40,155 41,263 41,731 42,620 55,425 57,648 60,816 61,596 62,496 4,712 5,141 5,469 5,532 5,561
G Williams 1,656 1,694 1,813 1,838 1,852 10 10 10 10 10 18 18 18 18 20 23 23 23 25 25
Norval 323 345 356 367 367 33 33 33 33 33 21 21 21 57 57 38 38 38 41 41
Not Serviced 16,741 16,468 16,303 16,376 16,711 2,124 2,236 2,296 2,330 2,372 1,168 1,244 1,269 1,322 1,427 627 653 694 715 762
TOTAL 493,045 555,707 624,094 688,895 752,537 106,721 120,492 133,608 145,681 162,240 113,667 133,170 153,236 163,420 178,296 30,544 34,831 40,839 46,610 49,463
Projected Flows by Area (ML/D)
Projected Flows to WWTPs
as per Strategy (ML/D)
Drainage Area 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 WWTP Drainage Area 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031
Acton 4.66 4.66 4.96 6.00 6.50 Acton 4.66 4.66 4.96 6.00 6.50
Georgetown 18.43 19.30 20.59 21.49 23.87 Georgetown 18.72 20.26 16.35 17.11 19.34
Milton 15.47 18.77 22.47 25.08 27.70 Milton1 15.47 18.77 18.50 18.50 18.50
Mid Halton 58.14 83.32 108.79 132.23 155.42 Mid Halton 58.14 83.32 118.45 144.67 170.64
Oakville SE 26.75 27.67 27.90 27.93 28.66 Oakville SE 26.75 27.67 27.90 27.93 28.66
Oakville SW 36.14 37.76 40.57 42.96 45.46 Oakville SW 36.14 37.76 40.57 42.96 45.46
Skyway 122.59 124.88 127.42 128.97 131.12 Skyway 122.59 124.88 127.42 128.97 131.12
Glen Williams 0.03 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.10 TOTAL2 282.47 317.31 354.15 386.13 420.23
Norval 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 1 Milton WWTP is capped at 18.5 ML/d and Mid Halton WWTP includes the flows diverted from Milton and Georgetown
Not Serviced 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.23 2 Total Projected Flows to WWTPs include Catch-up
TOTAL 282.26 316.43 352.80 384.82 419.10
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 50
7. Wastewater Capital Program
The complete wastewater capital program for the servicing strategies developed under the South Halton Master Plan Update and the North Halton Studies is provided in Table 20. This table provides Regional IPFS IDs, project descriptions, cost estimating details, and calculation of DC criteria. The preferred wastewater servicing strategy is depicted in Figure 13 and is based on the following key area components: Milton Lake Based Wastewater Servicing
Milton lake-based wastewater service area also includes the areas generally outside the central core of the community.
Wastewater is conveyed south to the Mid-Halton WWTP. Wastewater from the remaining areas is conveyed to the Milton WWTP. Excess flows to Milton WWTP beyond rated capacity for average and peak flows are diverted to the Mid-Halton WWTP.
Components of the servicing strategy for the Milton lake-based service area include:
BPII servicing will be initially conveyed to the existing Milton system and ultimately to the Britannia Road infrastructure
Convey and pump the Boyne Survey Area Phase III flows to the Hwy 25 trunk sewer Provide new trunk infrastructure for the east Milton servicing down Trafalgar Road, along Britannia Road
and to Lower Baseline Road Provide phasing opportunity for the post 2021 flows along Britannia Road Continue to convey flows to the Hwy 25 trunk sewer New section of the Hwy 25 trunk sewer south of Boyne WWPS Provide additional WWTP capacity at Mid-Halton Flows from Milton Education Village and lands east of Tremaine Rd will flow down Tremaine Rd and
along Lower Baseline before connecting to the new Hwy 25 trunk sewer.
Core Milton Servicing
Wastewater is conveyed south to the Milton Wastewater Treatment Plant for the northwest areas of the Milton core. Remaining areas direct flows to Mid-Halton Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Increased flow to the Milton plant can be diverted to the Mid-Halton Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Components of the servicing strategy include:
Expansion and Reconstruction of Fulton Pumping Station Twin forcemain between Fulton Pumping Station and Milton Wastewater Treatment Plant
Milton & Halton Hills 401 Employment Corridor Wastewater Servicing
Milton/Halton Hills 401 Corridor lake-based wastewater service area includes the areas generally along Steeles Ave.
Wastewater is conveyed south to the Mid-Halton WWTP.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 51
Components of the servicing strategy for the Milton/Halton Hills 401 Corridor lake-based service area include:
Two existing wastewater pumping stations along Steeles Ave to provide staged implementation and minimize sewer depth and convey flows west along Steeles Ave and south through the existing Milton Gravity system.
The eastern limits of the corridor will continue to pump flows west to the existing infrastructure. Once the new Trafalgar trunk sewer is in place, these flows will be diverted south allowing the post 2021 service areas in the western limits of the corridor to be serviced by existing infrastructure.
New Hwy 25 trunk sewer Provide additional WWTP capacity at Mid-Halton
North Oakville (East Growth Area) Wastewater Servicing
The North Oakville (East Growth Areas) are generally located east of Sixteen Mile Creek, North of Dundas Street, South of Hwy 407 and West of 9th Line.
The wastewater servicing strategy for these lands is to convey wastewater flows south to Dundas Street trunk sewer and west to the Third Line trunk sewer which continues to convey flows to Mid-Halton WWTP.
Components of the servicing strategy for North Oakville include:
Multiple wastewater pumping stations to provide staged implementation, minimize sewer depth and service areas with topographical constraints.
Sub-trunk sewers conveying flows south to the trunk sewer along Dundas Street Provide a wastewater pumping station and Forcemain to convey flows across Sixteen Mile Creek Provide additional WWTP capacity at Mid-Halton
North Oakville (West Growth Area) Wastewater Servicing
The North Oakville (West Growth Areas) are generally located west of Sixteen Mile Creek. The wastewater servicing strategy for these lands is, for the eastern most section, to convey wastewater
flows to the Third Line trunk sewer which continues to convey flows to Mid-Halton WWTP and, for the western most section, convey wastewater flows east along Dundas Street then south to existing sewers near Bronte Road ultimately to Mid-Halton WWTP.
Components of the servicing strategy for North Oakville include:
New trunk sewers along Dundas Street Provide additional WWTP capacity at Mid-Halton
Burlington (Central) Wastewater Servicing
The Burlington (Central Areas) include all areas in Burlington south of the Hwy 407 and Dundas Street excluding the North Aldershot areas.
The wastewater servicing strategy for these lands is to convey wastewater flows to the Skyway WWTP. This is achieved primarily through gravity sewers with localized wastewater pumping stations.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 52
Components of the servicing strategy for Burlington include:
Maximize available capacity within existing infrastructure. Localized servicing upgrades. Provide additional WWTP capacity at Skyway WWTP.
North Aldershot Wastewater Servicing
The North Aldershot service areas include all areas in Burlington generally west of the QEW. The wastewater servicing strategy for these lands is to convey wastewater flows to the Skyway WWTP.
This is achieved primarily through gravity sewers with localized wastewater pumping stations. Isolated areas maintain private servicing.
Components of the servicing strategy for North Aldershot include:
Maximize available capacity within existing infrastructure. Provide new trunk gravity servicing through North Aldershot to existing trunk sewers near Waterdown
Road and the Hwy 403. Localized wastewater pumping stations may be required. Provide additional WWTP capacity at Skyway WWTP.
Georgetown Wastewater Servicing
Maximize existing service areas to the existing Georgetown WWTP. Maintain existing process capacity at Georgetown WWTP.
Georgetown South and Southwest Georgetown
Areas within Georgetown South and Southwest Georgetown generally lie south of the 15th Sideroad and Silver Creek.
The wastewater servicing and strategies for areas is to convey flows south to the Mid-Halton WWTP. Components of this servicing strategy include:
New wastewater pumping stations to service the areas with topographical constraints and to pump flows across creek crossings and minimize sewer depth.
Trunk sewers from Georgetown down Eighth Line and Trafalgar Road to convey flows through East Milton to the Hwy 25 trunk sewer.
Acton Wastewater Servicing
Continue to provide wastewater servicing for the community to the Acton WWTP Expand capacity at the Acton WWTP Provide local servicing improvements to service new growth as required
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
Table 20 ‐ Wastewater Capital Program
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
4810 Long Term Biosolids Management and Implementation Plan REG STUDY 20,420,597$ -$ 20,420,597$ -$ 359,403$ 20,780,000$ 12,260,000$ -$ 8,520,000$ 5,878,800$ 2,641,200$ 1,780,000$ 19,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5095 Mid Halton WWTP Odour Control Studies (OAK) - $87,000/year for 20 years OAK STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,740,000$ -$ -$ 1,740,000$ 1,200,600$ 539,400$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$
5726 Acton WWTP Expansion to 7 ML/d HHACT WWTP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 22,890,000$ -$ -$ 22,890,000$ 15,794,100$ 7,095,900$ -$ 22,890,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5729 Halton Wastewater Master Plan (REG) - $880,000 in 2015, 2020, 2025 and 2030 REG STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,520,000$ -$ -$ 3,520,000$ 2,428,800$ 1,091,200$ -$ -$ -$ 880,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 880,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 880,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 880,000$ -$
5945 Mid-Halton new effluent sewer/outfall - Construction OAK WWTP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000,000$ -$ 26,100,000$ 63,900,000$ 44,091,000$ 19,809,000$ 90,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6187 Wastewater Treatment Capacity Annual Monitoring Report (REG) - $45,000/year for 20 years REG STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 900,000$ -$ -$ 900,000$ 621,000$ 279,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$
6188 Wastewater Collection System Analysis (REG) - $110,000/year for 20 years REG STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ 1,518,000$ 682,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$
6380 2400 mm WWM on new 3rd Line from 700 m north of Dundas St to Dundas St - Construction OAK WWM 2400 mm 695 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,632,000$ -$ -$ 7,632,000$ 5,266,080$ 2,365,920$ 7,632,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6381 2400 mm WWM on new road alignment from Lower Base Line to 3rd Line (700 m north of Dundas St) - Construction OAK WWM 2400 mm 4222 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 49,923,000$ -$ -$ 49,923,000$ 34,446,870$ 15,476,130$ 49,923,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6382 2100mm WWM on Regional Rd 25 from Boyne WWPS to Lower Base Line - Construction MIL WWM 2100 mm 2319 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,755,000$ -$ -$ 14,755,000$ 10,180,950$ 4,574,050$ 14,755,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6383 Mid Halton WWTP Phase 4/5 expansion from 75 ML/d to 125 ML/d (OAK) - Construction OAK WWTP 50 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000,000$ -$ -$ 120,000,000$ 82,800,000$ 37,200,000$ 120,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6384 Mid Halton North Pumping Station Expansion - Construction OAK WWPS 2315 L/s -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,500,000$ -$ -$ 13,500,000$ 9,315,000$ 4,185,000$ 13,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6565 TP Offset Program HHACT STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,300,000$ -$ -$ 3,300,000$ 2,277,000$ 1,023,000$ 200,000$ 300,000$ 400,000$ 2,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6566 Black Creek Monitoring Program HHACT STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 379,500$ 170,500$ 100,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6568 900 mm WWM on 8th Line from 10th Side Rd to 5th Side Rd HHGEO WWM 900 mm 3097 3,498,943$ 794,574$ 4,293,518$ 1,503,025$ 94,457$ 5,891,000$ -$ -$ 5,891,000$ 4,064,790$ 1,826,210$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,178,200$ 4,712,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6569 900 mm WWM on 8th Line from 5th Side Rd to Steeles Ave HHGEO WWM 900 mm 3083 3,483,126$ 794,258$ 4,277,384$ 1,497,513$ 94,102$ 5,869,000$ -$ -$ 5,869,000$ 4,049,610$ 1,819,390$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,173,800$ 4,695,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6572 1050 mm WWM on Steeles Ave from 8th Line to Crossing Easement HH401 WWM 1050 mm 375 1,254,373$ 25,087$ 1,279,460$ 447,392$ 28,148$ 1,755,000$ -$ -$ 1,755,000$ 1,210,950$ 544,050$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 351,000$ 1,404,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6588 Mid-Halton WWTP expansion from 125 ML/d to 175 ML/d OAK WWTP 50 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 93,304,000$ -$ -$ 93,304,000$ 64,379,760$ 28,924,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,866,080$ 16,794,720$ -$ 74,643,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total Capacity 458,509,000$ 12,260,000$ 26,100,000$ 420,149,000$ 289,902,810$ 130,246,190$ 298,132,000$ 42,482,000$ 692,000$ 3,572,000$ 2,158,080$ 19,789,720$ 11,104,000$ 74,935,200$ 1,172,000$ 292,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 1,122,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 1,122,000$ 242,000$
3706600 mm WWM crosing Dundas St and 600mm WWM on Dundas St from 900m west of Colonel William Parkway to Colonel William Parkway
OAK WWM 600 mm 884 2,151,218$ 767,577$ 2,918,795$ 1,021,992$ 64,213$ 4,005,000$ -$ -$ 4,005,000$ 2,843,550$ 1,161,450$ 4,005,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4994 600 mm WWM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Dundas Street OAK WWM 600 mm 2690 1,750,623$ 2,535,377$ 4,286,000$ 1,499,708$ 94,292$ 5,880,000$ -$ -$ 5,880,000$ 4,174,800$ 1,705,200$ -$ -$ 1,176,000$ 4,704,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4995 New 37 ML/d WWPS on Dundas St E approximately 550m west of Ninth Line (428 L/s) OAK WWPS 428 L/s 4,461,652$ 593,233$ 5,054,885$ 1,768,908$ 111,207$ 6,935,000$ -$ -$ 6,935,000$ 4,923,850$ 2,011,150$ -$ -$ 1,387,000$ 5,548,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5062 600 mm WWM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd West to Dundas Street OAK WWM 600 mm 2303 1,498,672$ 473,926$ 1,972,599$ 563,004$ 43,397$ 2,579,000$ -$ -$ 2,579,000$ 1,831,090$ 747,910$ -$ -$ 515,800$ 2,063,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5063 525 mm WWM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd West to Dundas Street OAK WWM 525 mm 2257 1,289,402$ 231,959$ 1,521,361$ 532,169$ 33,470$ 2,087,000$ -$ -$ 2,087,000$ 1,481,770$ 605,230$ 417,400$ 1,669,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5066 750 mm WWM on Fifth Line from new BPII WWPS (IPFS #5898) to Louis St Laurent Ave MIL WWM 750 mm 1014 960,603$ 294,121$ 1,254,724$ 438,672$ 27,604$ 1,721,000$ -$ -$ 1,721,000$ 1,221,910$ 499,090$ -$ -$ 344,200$ 1,376,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5067900 mm WWM on James Snow Parkway from Louis St Laurent Ave to Britannia Rd and 1200 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from Louis St Laurent Ave to Britannia Rd /Thompson Rd WWPS
MIL WWM 900mm / 1200 mm 4271 26,862,883$ 886,422$ 27,749,305$ 9,712,293$ 591,402$ 38,053,000$ -$ -$ 38,053,000$ 27,017,630$ 11,035,370$ -$ -$ 7,610,600$ 30,442,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
50683 x 450 mm WWFM from new WWPS (IPFS #5069) to 300 m east of R.R. 25 (Incl. portion of WWFM under 16 Mile Creek) - Design
MIL WWFM 450 mm 1000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 704,000$ -$ -$ 704,000$ 499,840$ 204,160$ 704,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5069 New 86 ML/d WWPS on Britannia Rd between 3rd Line and 16 Mile Creek (1000 L/s) - Design MIL WWPS 1000 L/s -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,633,000$ -$ -$ 1,633,000$ 1,159,430$ 473,570$ 1,633,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5900 675 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from 275 m west of Bronte Rd to 300 m west of Regional Rd 25 MIL WWM 675 mm 1330 1,115,695$ 540,522$ 1,656,217$ 579,347$ 36,437$ 2,272,000$ -$ -$ 2,272,000$ 1,613,120$ 658,880$ 454,400$ 1,817,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5905 375 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from east of Tremaine Rd to Project #5906 on new South Milton road alignment MIL WWM 375 mm 430 211,002$ 178,781$ 389,783$ 136,642$ 8,575$ 535,000$ -$ -$ 535,000$ 379,850$ 155,150$ 107,000$ 428,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5906 600 mm WWM on new Milton South road alignment from Britannia Rd to Tremaine Rd WWPS MIL WWM 600 mm 1544 1,004,611$ 464,045$ 1,468,656$ 514,033$ 32,310$ 2,015,000$ -$ -$ 2,015,000$ 1,430,650$ 584,350$ 403,000$ 1,612,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5907 300 mm WWM North Aldershot Servicing BURL WWM 300 mm 2090 2,881,065$ 229,760$ 3,110,825$ 1,088,737$ 68,438$ 4,268,000$ -$ -$ 4,268,000$ 3,030,280$ 1,237,720$ 4,268,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
5912 200 - 375 mm WWM on new Milton Phase 3 road alignment south to Britannia Rd MIL WWM 200 mm-375 mm 1342 658,697$ 13,174$ 671,871$ 235,348$ 14,781$ 922,000$ -$ -$ 922,000$ 654,620$ 267,380$ 184,400$ 737,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6114450 mm WWM on new road from west of Thompson Rd to Thompson Rd and 525 mm WWM on Thompson Rd from north of Britannia Rd to Britannia Rd
MIL WWM 450 mm / 525 mm 1725 958,185$ 209,530$ 1,167,715$ 408,596$ 25,690$ 1,602,000$ -$ -$ 1,602,000$ 1,137,420$ 464,580$ -$ -$ 320,400$ 1,281,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
61153 x 450 mm WWFM from new WWPS (IPFS #5069) to 300 m east of R.R. 25 (Incl. portion of WWFM under 16 Mile Creek) - Construction
MIL WWFM 450 mm 1000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,121,000$ -$ -$ 6,121,000$ 4,345,910$ 1,775,090$ -$ -$ 6,121,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6116 750 mm WWM on Louis St Laurent from 5th Line to James Snow Pkwy MIL WWM 750 mm 699 1,922,395$ 313,357$ 2,235,753$ 782,061$ 49,187$ 3,067,000$ -$ -$ 3,067,000$ 2,177,570$ 889,430$ -$ -$ 613,400$ 2,453,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6143 300mm WWM on North Service Rd from 440m east of Waterdown Rd to 360m north of North Service Rd - Part of 5907 BURL WWM 300 mm -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 355,000$ 145,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6215 600 mm WWM on Neyagawa Blvd from Burnhamthorpe Rd to new internal North Oakville road, north of Dundas St OAK WWM 600 mm 1888 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ 2,840,000$ 1,160,000$ 800,000$ 3,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6378675 mm WWM on Dundas St from Prince Michael Dr to 8th Line and 750 mm WWM on Dundas St from 8th Ln to Oak Park Blvd - Construction
OAK WWM 675 mm/ 750 mm 1909 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,200,000$ -$ -$ 4,200,000$ 2,982,000$ 1,218,000$ 4,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6379 2 x 400 mm WW Forcemains on Dundas St from new WWPS #4995 to Prince Michael Dr - Construction OAK WWFM 400 mm 800 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,400,000$ -$ -$ 1,400,000$ 994,000$ 406,000$ 1,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6427 New 86 ML/d WWPS on Britannia Rd between 3rd Line and 16 Mile Creek (1000 L/s) - Construction MIL WWPS 1000 L/s -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,193,000$ -$ -$ 14,193,000$ 10,077,030$ 4,115,970$ -$ -$ 14,193,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6481 450 mm WWM on internal road parallel to Dundas St from west of 16 Mile Creek Bridge to 190 m east of Proudfoot Trail OAK WWM 450 mm 400 211,703$ 4,234$ 215,937$ 75,312$ 4,751$ 296,000$ -$ -$ 296,000$ 210,160$ 85,840$ 59,200$ 236,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6496 Twinned 250 mm WWFM from Norval WWPS to Argyll Rd HHGEO WWFM 250 mm 1292 548,667$ 97,042$ 645,710$ 226,085$ 14,206$ 886,000$ -$ -$ 886,000$ 629,060$ 256,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 177,200$ 708,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6497 300 mm WWM on Derry Rd from 8th Line to Trafalgar Rd MIL WWM 300 mm 1361 591,692$ 11,834$ 603,525$ 211,197$ 13,278$ 828,000$ -$ -$ 828,000$ 587,880$ 240,120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,600$ 662,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6498 450 mm WWM on new road from 8th Line to Trafalgar Rd MIL WWM 450 mm 1380 730,383$ 395,340$ 1,125,723$ 393,511$ 24,766$ 1,544,000$ -$ -$ 1,544,000$ 1,096,240$ 447,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 308,800$ 1,235,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6499 300 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from 8th Line to Trafalgar/ Britannia WWPS MIL WWM 300 mm 1370 595,543$ 186,915$ 782,458$ 274,328$ 17,214$ 1,074,000$ -$ -$ 1,074,000$ 762,540$ 311,460$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 214,800$ 859,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6500 600 mm WWM on 4th Line from new road to Lower Base Line WWPS MIL WWM 600 mm 1272 3,095,635$ 61,913$ 3,157,547$ 1,104,987$ 69,466$ 4,332,000$ -$ -$ 4,332,000$ 3,075,720$ 1,256,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 866,400$ 3,465,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6501 450 mm WWM on 4th Line from south of Britannia Rd to new road MIL WWM 450 mm 1021 2,300,865$ 236,383$ 2,537,248$ 887,933$ 55,819$ 3,481,000$ -$ -$ 3,481,000$ 2,471,510$ 1,009,490$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 696,200$ 2,784,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6502 525 mm WWM on Thompson Rd and new internal road from south of Britannia to 4th Line MIL WWM 525 mm 2241 1,280,268$ 437,948$ 1,718,216$ 600,983$ 37,801$ 2,357,000$ -$ -$ 2,357,000$ 1,673,470$ 683,530$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 471,400$ 1,885,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6503 300 mm WWM on 8th Line from north of Derry Rd to Derry Rd MIL WWM 300 mm 625 271,704$ 94,369$ 366,072$ 127,874$ 8,054$ 502,000$ -$ -$ 502,000$ 356,420$ 145,580$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,400$ 401,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6504 450 mm WWM on 8th Line from north of new road to new road MIL WWM 450 mm 738 390,410$ 198,174$ 588,584$ 206,467$ 12,949$ 808,000$ -$ -$ 808,000$ 573,680$ 234,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 161,600$ 646,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6505 300 mm WWM on 8th Line from north of Britannia Rd to Britannia Rd MIL WWM 300 mm 452 196,471$ 92,864$ 289,335$ 101,299$ 6,365$ 397,000$ -$ -$ 397,000$ 281,870$ 115,130$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 79,400$ 317,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6506 675 mm WWM on 9th Line from Argyll Rd to 10th Side Rd - Georgetown South Connection HHGEO WWM 675 mm 1082 2,826,306$ 56,526$ 2,882,832$ 1,008,745$ 63,422$ 3,955,000$ -$ -$ 3,955,000$ 2,808,050$ 1,146,950$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 791,000$ 3,164,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6507 1200 mm WWM on Britannia Rd to 5th Line to James Snow Pkwy MIL WWM 1200 mm 625 2,242,600$ 44,852$ 2,287,452$ 800,224$ 50,324$ 3,138,000$ -$ -$ 3,138,000$ 2,227,980$ 910,020$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 627,600$ 2,510,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6508 Decommissioning of HH WWPS #3, connection to new 8th Line trunk sewer MIL WWPS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 355,000$ 145,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6550 525 mm WWM on Louis St Laurent Extension from Tremaine Rd to Tremaine Rd WWPS MIL WWM 525 mm 440 1,021,502$ 20,430$ 1,041,932$ 365,146$ 22,922$ 1,430,000$ -$ -$ 1,430,000$ 1,015,300$ 414,700$ 286,000$ 1,144,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6551 525 mm WWM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Project #5062 OAK WWM 525 mm 1900 1,085,505$ 21,710$ 1,107,215$ 387,426$ 24,359$ 1,519,000$ -$ -$ 1,519,000$ 1,078,490$ 440,510$ -$ -$ 303,800$ 1,215,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6552375 mm WWM on new road alignment in Milton Education Village from from 950 m south of Louis St Laurent extension to Louis St Laurent extension
MIL WWM 375 mm 950 2,084,962$ 41,699$ 2,126,662$ 744,552$ 46,787$ 2,918,000$ -$ -$ 2,918,000$ 2,071,780$ 846,220$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 583,600$ 2,334,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6553450 mm WWM on new road in Milton Education Village from 800m north of Louis St Laurent extension to Louis St Laurent extension and on Louis St Laurent extension from 340m west of Tremaine Rd to Tremaine Rd
MIL WWM 450 mm 1140 603,354$ 12,067$ 615,421$ 215,040$ 13,539$ 844,000$ -$ -$ 844,000$ 599,240$ 244,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 168,800$ 675,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6554 600 mm WWM on Lower Base Line from WWFM discharge approx 650 m west of 1st Line to Regional Rd 25 MIL WWM 600 mm 1911 4,650,802$ 536,969$ 5,187,771$ 1,816,098$ 114,131$ 7,118,000$ -$ -$ 7,118,000$ 5,053,780$ 2,064,220$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,423,600$ 5,694,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6555 17 ML/d WWPS on Tremaine Rd (200 L/s) MIL WWPS 200 L/s 2,083,712$ 2,636,674$ 4,720,386$ 1,651,765$ 103,848$ 6,476,000$ -$ -$ 6,476,000$ 4,597,960$ 1,878,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,295,200$ 5,180,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6556 Twinned 300 mm WWFM from Tremaine WWPS to Lower Base Line, approx 650 m west of 1st Line MIL WWFM 300 mm 1135 1,063,282$ 808,163$ 1,871,445$ 655,384$ 41,172$ 2,568,000$ -$ -$ 2,568,000$ 1,823,280$ 744,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 513,600$ 2,054,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6557600 mm WWM on Tremaine Rd from approximately 880 m north of South Tremaine Rd WWPS to South Tremaine Rd WWPS
MIL WWM 600 mm 882 2,147,425$ 264,925$ 2,412,350$ 844,579$ 53,072$ 3,310,000$ -$ -$ 3,310,000$ 2,350,100$ 959,900$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 662,000$ 2,648,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6558525 mm WWM on Tremaine Rd from approx 1500m north of South Tremaine WWPS to approx 880 m north of South Tremaine WWPS
MIL WWM 525 mm 657 1,525,345$ 442,849$ 1,968,195$ 688,505$ 43,300$ 2,700,000$ -$ -$ 2,700,000$ 1,917,000$ 783,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 540,000$ 2,160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6559 450 mm WWM on Tremaine Rd from Britannia Rd to 1700 m south of Britannia Rd MIL WWM 450 mm 1050 2,366,371$ 661,244$ 3,027,615$ 1,059,778$ 66,608$ 4,154,000$ -$ -$ 4,154,000$ 2,949,340$ 1,204,660$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 830,800$ 3,323,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Distribution - Greenfield
Annualized Funding Requirements
Capacity
Total Estimated Cost (2012$)
Benefit to Existing (2012$)
Oversizing (2012$)
DC (2012$) Res (2012$)Non-Res (2012$)
Length (m)Base Cost
(2012$)
Additional Costs
(2012$)
Subtotal(2012$)
Contingency/ Engineering
(2012$)
Non-Rebatable
HST(2012$)
Size/CapacityRegion IPFS ID
Project Description Municipality Project Type
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
Table 20 ‐ Wastewater Capital Program
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Annualized Funding RequirementsTotal Estimated
Cost (2012$)
Benefit to Existing (2012$)
Oversizing (2012$)
DC (2012$) Res (2012$)Non-Res (2012$)
Length (m)Base Cost
(2012$)
Additional Costs
(2012$)
Subtotal(2012$)
Contingency/ Engineering
(2012$)
Non-Rebatable
HST(2012$)
Size/CapacityRegion IPFS ID
Project Description Municipality Project Type
6560 525 mm WWM on James Snow Pkwy and new road alignment from Steeles Ave to Esquesing Line MIL WWM 525 mm 1708 975,795$ 431,858$ 1,407,654$ 492,378$ 30,968$ 1,931,000$ -$ -$ 1,931,000$ 1,371,010$ 559,990$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 386,200$ 1,544,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6561 375 mm WWM on new road and Britannia Rd from Milton Education Village to Tremaine Rd MIL WWM 375 mm 710 348,399$ 6,968$ 355,367$ 124,815$ 7,818$ 488,000$ -$ -$ 488,000$ 346,480$ 141,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 97,600$ 390,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6562450 mm WWM on new road from 440 m north of Derry Rd to Derry Rd and 525 mm WWM on Derry Rd from 725 m east of 5th Line to 5th Line
MIL WWM 525 mm 725 797,918$ 15,958$ 813,876$ 285,219$ 17,905$ 1,117,000$ -$ -$ 1,117,000$ 793,070$ 323,930$ 223,400$ 893,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6563 Decommissioning of temporary FM (IPFS #6112) MIL WWFM -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 710,000$ 290,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6564 525 mm WWM on new alignment from Esquesing Line to 3rd Line MIL WWM 525 mm 2104 1,202,289$ 950,172$ 2,152,461$ 753,185$ 47,354$ 2,953,000$ -$ -$ 2,953,000$ 2,096,630$ 856,370$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 590,600$ 2,362,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6567 Twinned 300 mm WWFM on 10th Side Rd from 9th Ln to 8th Ln HHGEO WWFM 300 mm 646 605,201$ 12,104$ 617,305$ 216,114$ 13,581$ 847,000$ -$ -$ 847,000$ 601,370$ 245,630$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 169,400$ 677,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6570 24 MLD WWPS at 10 Side Rd/9th Line (275 L/s) HHGEO WWPS 275 L/s 2,865,104$ 2,087,302$ 4,952,406$ 1,733,641$ 108,953$ 6,795,000$ -$ -$ 6,795,000$ 4,824,450$ 1,970,550$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,359,000$ 5,436,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6571 104 ML/d WWPS on Trafalgar Rd/ Britannia Rd (1200 L/s) MIL WWPS 1200 L/s 12,502,272$ 1,005,045$ 13,507,317$ 4,727,522$ 297,161$ 18,532,000$ -$ -$ 18,532,000$ 13,157,720$ 5,374,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,706,400$ 14,825,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6573 1050 mm WWM 401 Crossing from Steeles Ave to Auburn Rd MIL WWM 1050 mm 1250 4,181,243$ 2,013,550$ 6,194,792$ 2,167,922$ 136,285$ 8,499,000$ -$ -$ 8,499,000$ 6,034,290$ 2,464,710$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,699,800$ 6,799,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6574 1050 mm WWM on Auburn Rd from Hwy 401 crossing easement to Trafalgar Rd MIL WWM 1050 mm 870 1,280,734$ 849,628$ 2,130,363$ 745,769$ 46,868$ 2,923,000$ -$ -$ 2,923,000$ 2,075,330$ 847,670$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 584,600$ 2,338,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6575 1050 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd from Auburn Rd to Derry Rd MIL WWM 1050 mm 1850 2,723,401$ 2,103,662$ 4,827,063$ 1,689,742$ 106,195$ 6,623,000$ -$ -$ 6,623,000$ 4,702,330$ 1,920,670$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,324,600$ 5,298,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6576 1050 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd from Derry Rd to Golf Course MIL WWM 1050 mm 1805 2,657,350$ 454,314$ 3,111,664$ 1,088,880$ 68,457$ 4,269,000$ -$ -$ 4,269,000$ 3,030,990$ 1,238,010$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 853,800$ 3,415,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6577 1050 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd from Golf Course to Britannia Rd / Trafalgar Rd WWPS MIL WWM 1050 mm 1256 4,201,829$ 1,309,217$ 5,511,046$ 1,928,711$ 121,243$ 7,561,000$ -$ -$ 7,561,000$ 5,368,310$ 2,192,690$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,512,200$ 6,048,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6578 525 WWM on Trafalgar Rd from south of Britannia Rd to Britannia Rd/ Trafalgar Rd WWPS MIL WWM 525 mm 1176 2,731,268$ 260,797$ 2,992,065$ 1,047,110$ 65,825$ 4,105,000$ -$ -$ 4,105,000$ 2,914,550$ 1,190,450$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 821,000$ 3,284,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6579 Twinned 750 mm WWFM on Britannia Rd from Trafalgar Rd to 6th Line MIL WWFM 750 mm 1344 4,059,038$ 4,168,015$ 8,227,053$ 2,879,952$ 180,995$ 11,288,000$ -$ -$ 11,288,000$ 8,014,480$ 3,273,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,257,600$ 9,030,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6580 1200 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from 6th Line to 5th Line MIL WWM 1200 mm 1400 5,023,424$ 512,854$ 5,536,278$ 1,937,924$ 121,798$ 7,596,000$ -$ -$ 7,596,000$ 5,393,160$ 2,202,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,519,200$ 6,076,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6581 1350 mm WWM on 5th Line from Britannia Rd to Lower Base Line MIL WWM 1350 mm 2461 9,607,474$ 1,080,141$ 10,687,615$ 3,740,257$ 235,128$ 14,663,000$ -$ -$ 14,663,000$ 10,410,730$ 4,252,270$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,932,600$ 11,730,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6582 1350 mm WWM on Lower Base Line from 5th Line to 4th Line MIL WWM 1350 mm 1378 5,379,608$ 1,439,580$ 6,819,188$ 2,386,790$ 150,022$ 9,356,000$ -$ -$ 9,356,000$ 6,642,760$ 2,713,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,871,200$ 7,484,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6583 525 mm WWM on new road from 1400 m north of Britannia Rd to Britannia Rd MIL WWM 525 mm 1366 3,170,849$ 732,651$ 3,903,500$ 1,366,623$ 85,877$ 5,356,000$ -$ -$ 5,356,000$ 3,802,760$ 1,553,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,071,200$ 4,284,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6584 156 ML/d WWPS at Lower Base Line and 4th Line (1805 L/s) MIL WWPS 1805 L/s 18,805,501$ 1,896,110$ 20,701,611$ 7,245,954$ 455,435$ 28,403,000$ -$ -$ 28,403,000$ 20,166,130$ 8,236,870$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,680,600$ 22,722,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6585 Twinned 900 mm WWFM from Lower Base Line to RR 25 MIL WWFM 900 mm 3532 12,414,055$ 3,862,331$ 16,276,386$ 5,696,534$ 358,080$ 22,331,000$ -$ -$ 22,331,000$ 15,855,010$ 6,475,990$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 446,620$ 4,019,580$ 17,864,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6586 750 mm WWM on 8th Line from Argyll Rd to 10th Side Rd HHGEO WWM 750 mm 1059 1,003,830$ 294,986$ 1,298,816$ 454,610$ 28,574$ 1,782,000$ -$ -$ 1,782,000$ 1,265,220$ 516,780$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 356,400$ 1,425,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6587 600 mm WWM on 8th Line from Miller Rd to Argyll Rd HHGEO WWM 600 mm 1225 797,112$ 237,919$ 1,035,031$ 362,199$ 22,771$ 1,420,000$ -$ -$ 1,420,000$ 1,008,200$ 411,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 284,000$ 1,136,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6589 3 ML/d WWPS on 10th Side Rd in Norval (35 L/s ) HHGEO WWPS 35 L/s 364,650$ 133,793$ 498,443$ 174,592$ 10,966$ 684,000$ -$ -$ 684,000$ 485,640$ 198,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 136,800$ 547,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total Distribution - Greenfield 336,349,000$ -$ -$ 336,349,000$ 238,807,790$ 97,541,210$ 19,644,800$ 11,739,200$ 32,585,200$ 49,084,800$ 200,000$ 14,738,400$ 60,684,400$ 19,723,200$ -$ 2,212,620$ 16,900,980$ 47,410,600$ 32,027,400$ 28,031,800$ 1,365,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6482 300 mm WWM on Plains Rd West from Grand View heading due north west BURL WWM 300 105 91,295$ 1,826$ 93,121$ 32,592$ 2,049$ 128,000$ -$ -$ 128,000$ 84,480$ 43,520$ -$ -$ -$ 25,600$ 102,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6483 325 mm WWM on Plains Rd West from Grand View heading due north west BURL WWM 325 59 58,911$ 1,178$ 60,089$ 21,031$ 1,322$ 82,000$ -$ -$ 82,000$ 54,120$ 27,880$ -$ -$ -$ 16,400$ 65,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6484 375 mm WWM on Plains Rd West from Grand View heading due north west BURL WWM 375 66 64,701$ 1,294$ 65,995$ 23,098$ 1,452$ 91,000$ -$ -$ 91,000$ 60,060$ 30,940$ -$ -$ -$ 18,200$ 72,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6485 375 mm WWM on Plains Rd West between Howard Rd and entrance to Spring Gardens BURL WWM 375 428 420,042$ 8,401$ 428,442$ 149,955$ 9,426$ 588,000$ -$ -$ 588,000$ 388,080$ 199,920$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 117,600$ 470,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6486 200 mm WWM on Plains Rd West between Howard Rd and entrance to Spring Gardens BURL WWM 200 60 43,534$ 871$ 44,405$ 15,542$ 977$ 61,000$ -$ -$ 61,000$ 40,260$ 20,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,200$ 48,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6487 525 mm WWM on Plains Rd West between Howard Rd and entrance to Spring Gardens BURL WWM 525 1430 1,633,970$ 32,679$ 1,666,650$ 583,327$ 36,666$ 2,287,000$ -$ -$ 2,287,000$ 1,509,420$ 777,580$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 457,400$ 1,829,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6488 250 mm WWM on Guelph Line between Woodward and 120m south of Prospect Street BURL WWM 250 304 236,754$ 4,735$ 241,489$ 84,521$ 5,313$ 331,000$ -$ -$ 331,000$ 218,460$ 112,540$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 66,200$ 264,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6489 450 mm WWM on Appleby Line between Fairview Street and 151 m south of Harvester Rd BURL WWM 450 583 617,115$ 435,892$ 1,053,007$ 368,553$ 23,166$ 1,445,000$ -$ -$ 1,445,000$ 953,700$ 491,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 289,000$ 1,156,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6490 300 mm WWM on Pearl Street between Old Lakeshore Rd and Pine Street BURL WWM 300 112 97,154$ 44,978$ 142,132$ 49,746$ 3,127$ 195,000$ -$ -$ 195,000$ 128,700$ 66,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 39,000$ 156,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6491 525 mm WWM on Lakshore Rd between Old Lakeshore Rd entrance and Torrance Street BURL WWM 525 83 94,925$ 1,898$ 96,823$ 33,888$ 2,130$ 133,000$ -$ -$ 133,000$ 87,780$ 45,220$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 26,600$ 106,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6492 825 mm WWM on Maple Avenue East Between Lakeshore Rd and Fairview Street BURL WWM 825 1996 4,099,668$ 372,708$ 4,472,376$ 1,565,331$ 98,392$ 6,136,000$ -$ -$ 6,136,000$ 4,049,760$ 2,086,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,227,200$ 4,908,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6493 300 mm WWM on Atwood Ave/Murno Circle and existing sewer alignment from Berton Blvd to Maple Ave HHGEO WWM 300 1693 1,472,031$ 29,441$ 1,501,471$ 525,515$ 33,032$ 2,060,000$ -$ -$ 2,060,000$ 1,359,600$ 700,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 412,000$ 1,648,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6494 300 mm WWM on Arborglen Drive and across North Halton Golf Course towards Maple Ave HHGEO WWM 300 230 199,981$ 4,000$ 203,980$ 71,393$ 4,488$ 280,000$ -$ -$ 280,000$ 184,800$ 95,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 56,000$ 224,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6495 300 mm WWM on Delrex Blvd between Irwin Crescent and the southern entrance to Fauldon Drive HHGEO WWM 300 115 99,990$ 2,000$ 101,990$ 35,697$ 2,244$ 140,000$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 92,400$ 47,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,000$ 112,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6509 450 mm WWM on Mill Street between Wilbur Street North and Wallace Street HHACT WWM 450 177 187,357$ 3,747$ 191,104$ 66,887$ 4,204$ 262,000$ -$ -$ 262,000$ 172,920$ 89,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 52,400$ 209,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6510 300 mm WWM on Main Street South between Cobblehill Rd and Brock Street HHACT WWM 300 122 106,077$ 2,122$ 108,198$ 37,869$ 2,380$ 148,000$ -$ -$ 148,000$ 97,680$ 50,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 29,600$ 118,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6511 600 mm WWM from Elgin Street South along Black Creek alignment to Tanners Drive HHACT WWM 600 255 332,151$ 6,643$ 338,794$ 118,578$ 7,453$ 465,000$ -$ -$ 465,000$ 306,900$ 158,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 93,000$ 372,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6512 525 mm WWM from Elgin Street South along Black Creek alignment to Tanners Drive HHACT WWM 525 997 1,139,209$ 22,784$ 1,161,993$ 406,697$ 25,564$ 1,594,000$ -$ -$ 1,594,000$ 1,052,040$ 541,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 318,800$ 1,275,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6513 250 mm WWM on Storey Drive between Kingham and Cobblehill Rd HHACT WWM 250 180 140,392$ 2,808$ 143,200$ 50,120$ 3,150$ 196,000$ -$ -$ 196,000$ 129,360$ 66,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 39,200$ 156,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6514 450 mm WWM on Maple Ave between Main Street East and Turner Drive MIL WWM 450 158 167,246$ 3,345$ 170,590$ 59,707$ 3,753$ 234,000$ -$ -$ 234,000$ 154,440$ 79,560$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 46,800$ 187,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6515 300 mm WWM on Childs Drive between Ontario Street South and the south entrance of Satok Crescent MIL WWM 300 241 209,875$ 93,132$ 303,007$ 106,053$ 6,666$ 416,000$ -$ -$ 416,000$ 274,560$ 141,440$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 83,200$ 332,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6516 375 mm WWM on Nipissing Rd between Milton Mall entrance and Childs Drive MIL WWM 375 151 147,861$ 2,957$ 150,818$ 52,786$ 3,318$ 207,000$ -$ -$ 207,000$ 136,620$ 70,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,400$ 165,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6517 450 mm WWM on Oak Street between Charles Street and Ontario Street South MIL WWM 450 704 745,232$ 14,905$ 760,137$ 266,048$ 16,723$ 1,043,000$ -$ -$ 1,043,000$ 688,380$ 354,620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 208,600$ 834,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6518 250 mm WWM on Donald Campbell Avenue between Ontario Street South and Cemetary Rd MIL WWM 250 82 64,254$ 1,285$ 65,539$ 22,939$ 1,442$ 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$ 59,400$ 30,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,000$ 72,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6519 375 mm WWM between 50 m south of Wakefield Rd and the southern tip of Fulton Street MIL WWM 375 258 253,203$ 5,064$ 258,267$ 90,393$ 5,682$ 354,000$ -$ -$ 354,000$ 233,640$ 120,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 70,800$ 283,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6520 525 mm WWM between 50 m south of Wakefield Rd and the southern tip of Fulton Street MIL WWM 525 84 96,235$ 1,925$ 98,160$ 34,356$ 2,160$ 135,000$ -$ -$ 135,000$ 89,100$ 45,900$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 27,000$ 108,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6521 750 mm WWM linking Oak Street east to Oak Street West MIL WWM 750 9 16,693$ 334$ 17,027$ 5,960$ 375$ 23,000$ -$ -$ 23,000$ 15,180$ 7,820$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,600$ 18,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6522 250 mm on Bronte Street West between Main Street West and Robert Street MIL WWM 250 274 213,708$ 4,274$ 217,983$ 76,294$ 4,796$ 299,000$ -$ -$ 299,000$ 197,340$ 101,660$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 59,800$ 239,200$ -$
6523 450 mm WWM on Bronte Street South between Anne Blvd and 67 m north of Laurier Ave entrance MIL WWM 450 264 279,448$ 195,955$ 475,403$ 166,391$ 10,459$ 652,000$ -$ -$ 652,000$ 430,320$ 221,680$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 130,400$ 521,600$ -$
6524600 mm WWM on Williams Ave/Commercial Street from southern corner of Williams Ave and south down Commercial Street to Laurier Ave
MIL WWM 600 499 649,046$ 12,981$ 662,027$ 231,709$ 14,565$ 908,000$ -$ -$ 908,000$ 599,280$ 308,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 181,600$ 726,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6525750 mm WWM on Anne Blvd between Bronte Street South and down along the length of Meadowbrook Drive and across Bronte Meadows Park to join Williams Ave at southern corner
MIL WWM 750 912 1,728,283$ 34,566$ 1,762,849$ 616,997$ 38,783$ 2,419,000$ -$ -$ 2,419,000$ 1,596,540$ 822,460$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 483,800$ 1,935,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6526 450 mm WWM on service Rd for West River WWPS from West River Street to WWPS OAK WWM 450 95 100,609$ 2,012$ 102,621$ 35,917$ 2,258$ 141,000$ -$ -$ 141,000$ 93,060$ 47,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,200$ 112,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6527 450 mm WWM on service road to Marine Drive WWPS from Marine Drive OAK WWM 450 18 19,095$ 382$ 19,476$ 6,817$ 428$ 27,000$ -$ -$ 27,000$ 17,820$ 9,180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,400$ 21,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6528 31.9 L/s upgrade of West River WWPS OAK WWPS 32 333,394$ 6,668$ 340,062$ 119,022$ 7,481$ 467,000$ 119,000$ -$ 348,000$ 229,680$ 118,320$ -$ 93,400$ 373,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6529 375 mm WWM on Oak Park from Dundas Street East to Central Park then along Central Park to Georgian Drive OAK WWM 375 610 598,657$ 11,973$ 610,631$ 213,721$ 13,434$ 838,000$ -$ -$ 838,000$ 553,080$ 284,920$ -$ -$ -$ 167,600$ 670,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6530 300 mm WWM on Kerr Street between Forster Park and Rebecca Street OAK WWM 300 710 617,331$ 12,347$ 629,678$ 220,387$ 13,853$ 864,000$ -$ -$ 864,000$ 570,240$ 293,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 172,800$ 691,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6531250 mm WWM on Chisholm/Rebecca Street between Forsyth Street and Chisholm Street on Rebecca Street and on Chisholm Street between Rebecca Street and 45 m north of Lakeshore Rd West
OAK WWM 250 200 155,992$ 3,120$ 159,111$ 55,689$ 3,500$ 218,000$ -$ -$ 218,000$ 143,880$ 74,120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 43,600$ 174,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6532 525 mm WWM on Stewart Street between Felan Drive and Kerr Street OAK WWM 525 225 257,093$ 5,142$ 262,235$ 91,782$ 5,769$ 360,000$ -$ -$ 360,000$ 237,600$ 122,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 72,000$ 288,000$ -$ -$ -$
6534 375 mm WWM on Lyons Lane between Cross Ave and due north up Lyons Lane 150 m OAK WWM 375 150 147,211$ 2,944$ 150,155$ 52,554$ 3,303$ 206,000$ -$ -$ 206,000$ 135,960$ 70,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,200$ 164,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6535450 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd between 10 m north of Inglehart Street North and over Cornwall Rd and railway to connect to Cross Ave
OAK WWM 450 412 436,109$ 432,272$ 868,381$ 303,933$ 19,104$ 1,191,000$ -$ -$ 1,191,000$ 786,060$ 404,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 238,200$ 952,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6536 525 mm WWM on Cross Avenue between Argus Rd and Lyons Lane OAK WWM 525 395 451,341$ 935,153$ 1,386,494$ 485,273$ 30,503$ 1,902,000$ -$ -$ 1,902,000$ 1,255,320$ 646,680$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 380,400$ 1,521,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Distribution - Built Boundary
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
Table 20 ‐ Wastewater Capital Program
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Annualized Funding RequirementsTotal Estimated
Cost (2012$)
Benefit to Existing (2012$)
Oversizing (2012$)
DC (2012$) Res (2012$)Non-Res (2012$)
Length (m)Base Cost
(2012$)
Additional Costs
(2012$)
Subtotal(2012$)
Contingency/ Engineering
(2012$)
Non-Rebatable
HST(2012$)
Size/CapacityRegion IPFS ID
Project Description Municipality Project Type
6537675 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd between Spruce Steet until 60 m north of Cornwall Rd where it follows the side road crossing the railway line and through the Go Transit Stn car Park and heads due west and north up Argus Rd for 60 m
OAK WWM 675 737 1,236,492$ 1,151,553$ 2,388,044$ 835,816$ 52,537$ 3,276,000$ -$ -$ 3,276,000$ 2,162,160$ 1,113,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 655,200$ 2,620,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6538 Upgraded gravity sewer within UGC on North Service Rd from Truman Ave to east of Pearson Dr OAK WWM 450 650 344,018$ -$ 344,018$ 120,406$ 7,568$ 472,000$ -$ -$ 472,000$ 311,520$ 160,480$ -$ -$ 94,400$ 377,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6540 Twin 900 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd and Randall Street/Rebecca Street from Lawson Street to Wilson Street OAK WWM 900 1200 6,248,911$ -$ 6,248,911$ 2,187,119$ 137,476$ 8,574,000$ -$ -$ 8,574,000$ 5,658,840$ 2,915,160$ 1,714,800$ 6,859,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6541 Deep Trunk Sewer on Rebecca St and Lakeshore Rd W from Wilson St to Oakville SW WWTP OAK WWM 1050 3,600 33,164,424$ -$ 33,164,424$ 11,607,548$ 729,617$ 45,502,000$ 15,926,000$ -$ 29,576,000$ 19,520,160$ 10,055,840$ 9,100,400$ 36,401,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6542 Decommissioning of 5 WWPSs OAK WWPS 364,431$ -$ 364,431$ 127,551$ 8,017$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 330,000$ 170,000$ -$ 100,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6543 Gravity Sewers from Decommissioned WWPS's to New Deep Trunk OAK WWM 955,368$ -$ 955,368$ 334,379$ 21,018$ 1,311,000$ -$ -$ 1,311,000$ 865,260$ 445,740$ -$ 262,200$ 1,048,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6544 6 L/s upgrade of Bronte Yacht Club WWPS OAK WWPS 6 L/s 62,511$ 1,250$ 63,762$ 22,317$ 1,403$ 87,000$ 19,000$ -$ 68,000$ 44,880$ 23,120$ -$ 17,400$ 69,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6545 41 L/s upgrade of Junction Street WWPS BURL WWPS 41 L/s 427,161$ 8,543$ 435,704$ 152,496$ 9,585$ 598,000$ 135,000$ -$ 463,000$ 305,580$ 157,420$ -$ 119,600$ 478,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6546Construction of approx 100 m of new local sewer to eliminate Shepherd Rd WWPS sewer sized adequately to accommodate 2031 flows of approximately 21.2 L/s
OAK WWPS 400,000$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 264,000$ 136,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 320,000$ -$ -$
6547 23 L/s upgrade of Grandview Avenue WWPS BURL WWPS 23 L/s 239,627$ 4,793$ 244,419$ 85,547$ 5,377$ 335,000$ 139,000$ -$ 196,000$ 129,360$ 66,640$ -$ 67,000$ 268,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total Distribution - Built Boundary 90,671,000$ 16,338,000$ -$ 74,333,000$ 49,059,780$ 25,273,220$ 10,815,200$ 43,920,400$ 2,732,800$ 605,400$ 1,219,000$ 2,264,000$ 4,381,400$ 1,495,200$ 3,324,400$ 5,629,400$ 1,567,000$ 3,066,000$ 2,829,800$ 1,036,400$ 2,377,600$ 1,768,000$ 368,000$ 510,200$ 760,800$ -$
885,529,000$ 28,598,000$ 26,100,000$ 830,831,000$ 577,770,380$ 253,060,620$ 328,592,000$ 98,141,600$ 36,010,000$ 53,262,200$ 3,577,080$ 36,792,120$ 76,169,800$ 96,153,600$ 4,496,400$ 8,134,020$ 18,709,980$ 50,718,600$ 35,099,200$ 30,190,200$ 3,985,200$ 2,010,000$ 610,000$ 752,200$ 1,882,800$ 242,000$ TOTAL
5063 4994
5908
6215
5900
5906
5067
5912
5911
6114
5066
5910
3706
6381
(C)/3
794 (
EA/D
)
611650
62
6551
6562
6382
(C)/3
867 (
EA/D
)
6378 (C)6380
(C)
5905
5894
46483863
58913799
5892
5904
4997
5903
5497
6481
5907
6585
6567
6579
6496
6556
/6379
6115/5068
6112
3865
58933797 5923
5899
5728
5898
#*
#*
#*
#*#*6570
6571
6589
6584
6555
$+
#*
#*
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
$+
$+
$+
$+
$+
6541
6492
6540
6530
6538
6537
6494
6485/6486/6487 6489
6532
6540
6493
6493
6525
6512/6511
6517
6543
6536
6535
6524
6529
6488
6522
6523
6515
6509
6519/6520
6514
6534
6495
6516
6513
6531
6490
6510
65266491
6518
6482/6483/6484
6527
6521
6543
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
#
#
#
##
#
##
4996
49953800(D)
6143QEW
Hwy 401
Hwy 7
Hwy 403
Hw
y 6
Guelph St
Guelph St W
QE
W
Hwy 403
Hwy 7
QE
W
Hwy 401
Hw
y 403
Hw
y 403
Six
th L
ine
No 15 Siderd
Wa
lke
r'S
Lin
e
Fift
h L
ine
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Se
con
d L
ine
No 32 Siderd
New St
No 5 Siderd
Tw
iss
Rd
No 25 Siderd
Du
blin
Lin
e
Rebecca St
Fairview St
North Service Rd
Mainway
Ten
th L
ine
Fir
st L
ine
Lakeshore Rd
Speers Rd
Kin
g R
d
Lakeshore Rd W
Main St E
Milb
uro
ug
h L
ine
Campbellville Rd
Ce
da
r S
pri
ng
s R
d
Ap
ple
by
Lin
e
Harvester Rd
No 10 Siderd
No 20 Siderd
Guelph St
Win
sto
n C
hu
rch
ill B
lvd
Cornwall Rd
Th
om
ps
on
Rd
S
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Ke
rr St
Upper Middle Rd
Britannia Rd
No 17 Siderd
No 1 Siderd
Lakeshore Rd E
Na
ssa
ga
we
ya-E
squ
es
ing
Tlin
e
Steeles Ave W
No 30 Siderd
Bra
nt
St
Th
ird
Lin
e
Mc
Niv
en
Rd
Colling Rd
North Service Rd W
Kilbride St
Plains Rd W
Be
ll S
cho
ol
Lin
e
Wa
terd
ow
n R
d
Kelso Rd
Fo
rd D
r
Ma
in S
t S
Nin
th L
ine
Gu
elp
h L
ine
No 3 Siderd
Pe
ru R
d
Lower Base Line E
Bro
nte
Rd
Mai
n S
t
Ma
ple Ave
Lower Base Line
No 14 Siderd
River Dr
Esq
ue
sin
g L
ine
Bu
rlo
ak
Dr
Plains Rd E
Blin
d L
ine
Na
ssa
ga
we
ya-P
us
chlin
ch T
line
Mo
un
tain
vie
w R
d S
No 2 Siderd
Royal Windsor Dr
Bo
sto
n C
hu
rch
Rd
North
Ser
vice R
d E
No 4 Siderd
Bro
nte
St
S
Ch
art
we
ll R
d
Ma
in S
t N
Mill St W
Main St W
Wyecroft Rd
Clayhill Rd
Lower Base Line W
Ma
rtin
St
Mo
rris
on
Rd
Tra
falg
ar R
d
Fallbrook Trail
North Shore Blvd E
Co
nfe
de
rati
on
St
Nottinghill G
ate
Ma
ple
Gro
ve
Dr
No 8 Siderd
Auburn Rd
Reid Siderd
Kingsway Dr
No 22 Siderd
South Service Rd E
Re
yno
lds S
t
Ho
rnb
y R
d
Bro
nte
St
N
No 28 Siderd
Wildwood Rd
Industrial St
No 27 Siderd
Mo
un
tain
vie
w R
d N
Queen St
On
tari
o S
t N
Cre
ws
on
s L
ine
Burnhamthorpe Rd W
Campbell Ave E
Britannia Rd W
Leighland Ave
South Service Rd W
Eas
tpor
t Dr
He
nd
ers
on
Rd
Tre
ma
ine
Rd
Th
om
ps
on
Rd
NC
hu
rch
ill R
d S
Cross Ave
Sh
erw
oo
d H
eig
hts
Dr
Ch
urc
hill
Rd
N
South Service Rd
Mississa
ga St
Panin Rd
Queensway Dr
Glen Lawson Rd
Prince St
Fra
ser
Dr
No 12 Siderd
Se
ne
ca
Ave
Great Lakes B
lvd
Iroquois Shore Rd
Josh
ua
s C
ree
k D
r
Sysc
on
Rd
James St
Ha
ll R
d
South Sheridan Way
Old
Pin
ecr
est
Rd
La
salle
Pa
rk R
d
Upper Middle Rd W
Mountain Brow Rd
Th
ird
Lin
eT
hir
d L
ine
Fift
h L
ine
Campbellville Rd
Ap
ple
by
Lin
e
Map
le A
ve
Lower Base Line W
Britannia Rd
Steeles Ave W
Third Line
Th
ird
Lin
e
Fift
h L
ine
No 3 Siderd
Wyecroft Rd
South Service Rd W
Be
ll S
cho
ol
Lin
e
Nin
th L
ine
Wa
lke
r'S
Lin
e
No 17 Siderd
No 10 Siderd
Na
ssa
ga
we
ya-P
us
chlin
ch T
line
Ten
th L
ine
No 20 Siderd
Plains Rd E
Britannia Rd
South Service Rd E
Fift
h L
ine
Six
th L
ine
Eig
hth
Lin
e
South Service Rd
No 17 Siderd
South Service Rd
No 3 Siderd
No 2 Siderd
No 27 Siderd
Ten
th L
ine
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Du
blin
Lin
e
Milb
uro
ug
h L
ine
South Service Rd W
No 22 Siderd
First L
ine
Milb
uro
ug
h L
ine
No 22 Siderd
Eig
hth
Lin
e
Six
th L
ine
Bu
rlo
ak
Dr
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Six
th L
ine
Fo
urt
h L
ine
No 1 Siderd
Na
ssa
ga
we
ya-P
us
chlin
ch T
line
Eig
hth
Lin
e
No 17 Siderd
Ma
in S
t N
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Fo
urt
h L
ine
Milb
uro
ug
h L
ine
Eig
hth
Lin
e
No 30 Siderd
No 1 Siderd
No 2 Siderd
Ten
th L
ine
Fir
st L
ine
Th
ird
Lin
e
Tra
falg
ar
Rd
Gu
elp
h L
ine
Tre
ma
ine
Rd
Ap
ple
by
Lin
e
Derry Rd
Re
g R
d 2
5
Dundas St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd W
Dundas St W
Nin
th L
ine
Britannia Rd W
Bro
nte
Rd
Dundas St E
Bra
nt
St
Do
rva
l Dr
Derry Rd E
No 10 Siderd
Upper Middle Rd E
Ford Dr
Win
sto
n C
hu
rch
ill B
lvd
No 20 Siderd
Upper Middle Rd W
Ne
yag
aw
a B
lvd
Britannia Rd E
Steeles Ave E
Maple Ave
Bu
rlo
ak
Dr
Burnhamthorpe Rd E
Burnhamthorpe Rd W
No 32 Siderd
Ma
rtin
St
Ma
in S
t S
Upper Middle Rd
Steeles Ave W
Ma
in S
t N
Fo
urth
Lin
e
Jam
es
Sn
ow
Pky
Re
g R
d 2
5
Nin
th L
ine
Tra
falg
ar
Rd
Gu
elp
h L
ine
James Snow Pky
Re
g R
d 2
5
Win
sto
n C
hu
rch
ill B
lvd
Win
sto
n C
hu
rch
ill B
lvd
Hwy 407 Hwy 407
6384 (C)/3808 (EA/D)6383 (D)/5945(C)
5508
5922, 5315
5726/802
5069(D), 6427(C)
3864
3798
5898
5902/6508
6588
6568
6569
6581
6554
6575
6583
6576
6564
6560
6580
6498
6502
6497
6573
6500
6587
6578
6506
6552
6586
6559
6557
657765
53
6504
6501
6558
6503
6507
6550
Acton WWTP
Skyway WWTP
Milton WWTP
Georgetown WWTP
Oakville SW WWTP
Oakville SE WWTP
ELIZABETH GARDEN PS
5924
6582
6499
6574
6505
6561
6572
Halton Preferred Wastewater Servicing Strategy
Lake OntarioHamilton Harbour
August 20111:40,000
60114062-348-WW2012 Development Charges Update
LegendExisting Infrastructure# Wastewater Pumping Station
$ Wastewater Treatment Plant
Wastewater Main
Wastewater Forcemain
Previously Approved Infrastructure#* Wastewater Pumping Station
$+ Wastewater Treatment Plant
Wastewater Main
Proposed/Upgrade Infrastructure#* Wastewater Pumping Station
$+ Wastewater Treatment Plant
Proposed Alignment - Wastewater Main
Wastewater Forcemain
Distribution-Built Boundary Wastewater main
Funded Infrastructure#* Wastewater Pumping Station
$+ Wastewater Treatment Plant
Wastewater Main
Wastewater Forcemain
WWTP Drainage Area
³
Figure 13
/6563
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011
APPENDIX A
Design Criteria Review Executive Summary
AECOM
105 Commerce Valley Drive West, Floor 7 905 886 7022 tel
Markham, ON, Canada L3T 7W3 905 886 9494 fax
www.aecom.com
Memorandum
Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final
To Region of Halton Page 1
CC
Subject Sustainable HaltonDesign Criteria ReviewExecutive Summary
From Chris Hamel
Date December 2010 Project Number 60114062
AECOM have prepared Water and Wastewater Design Criteria Memoranda for review, datedDecember 2010 to support the Sustainable Halton project. This memo is intended to provide anexecutive summary of the design criteria review as well as provide additional context.
Background
It has been typical practice to review the design criteria as part of the recent Master Plan updates forHalton Region. The focus of the previous design criteria reviews has been with respect to theresidential and employment water demand consumptions and wastewater flow generations. This iscommon practice to ensure that the projected water and wastewater flows are accurate and reflectnew trends to support decision making for the sizing and timing of future infrastructure including pipesand facilities.
The approach taken under Sustainable Halton has been more intensive than in the past. Not only toensure the projections are reasonable, but the review was considered more critical in light ofperceived and/or actual changes in recent water use/wastewater generation as well as greateremphasis in ranging future development in greenfield and intensification areas.
Approach
Moving forward, it is recommended that the overall application of the design criteria be integrated intoseveral related processes to ensure consistency between the processes:
i) Master Planningii) Development Application Reviewiii) Development Control Monitoring Report (DCMR)iv) Rate setting and revenue budgeting
The approach to project flows under previous Master Plans was to apply the design criteria to thehorizon year planning projections. This approach was reconciled against historical flows but was notnecessarily influenced by historical trends.
Page 2
Memorandum – Design Criteria Executive SummaryDecember 2010
Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final
The approach moving forward is based on establishing a yearly starting point, calculated fromhistorical flows, and projecting growth flows from this starting point forward. The rationale andrecommendation for this approach was documented in the Development Control Monitoring Reportreview. This approach is being implemented in the DCMR as well as the Master Plan processes andwill ensure continuity in projections as well will better serve reconciliation through the allocationprocesses.
Under this approach, the design criteria will be applied to the residential and employment growth onlyand added to the starting point to project interval year flows. As such, the design criteria mustestimate what will be consumed/generated and not necessarily what was consumed/generated.
An overall guiding principle for the design criteria is to ensure that the flow projections are adequatelypredicted with an appropriate level of safety and risk management in order that the infrastructure hassufficient capacity to meet the servicing requirements and that the timing of key infrastructure andfacilities does not compromise operation of the facilities or impede planned and approved growth. Onthis basis, for Master Planning purposes, the design criteria should reflect a total water productionneed which includes consumption and non-revenue water use.
A related task within the Region is revenue budgeting. The Region is tasked with balancing the coststo operate the systems with incoming revenue from water and sewer rates. Design criteria andprojected flows are utilized to estimate the future water and sewer uses to estimate future revenues.While the design criteria process does not specifically address the revenue budgeting process, it isrecommended that continuity with the information derived through the Master Planning process (ie:starting point) be considered. It was noted from review of the criteria analysis under the revenuebudgeting, that emphasis was placed on trending water use outside the peak summer months. Whilethis may be relevant to not over estimate revenues, criteria for master planning must specificallyaddress the peak summer months to ensure that level of service is maintained under worst caseconditions.
As mentioned, the following key issues were also considered during the design criteria reviewprocess:
i) Recent perceived/actual decreasing trends in water useii) Impact of “greener” more water efficient development moving forwardiii) Reconciliation of population projections and growth trends with respect to actual
conditionsiv) Potential to change (lower) the design criteria
These issues have been addressed in the following manner:i) The approach of deriving a new starting point each year will recognize any recent trends in
the historical water use or wastewater flows. The approach utilizes a 5-year rolling averagein order to appropriately consider variances over the 5 years and not simply rely on theprevious year only.
ii) It is recognized that the Region’s water efficiency program will continue to be implementedmoving forward. Through co-ordination with the Region team, a 5% reduction in waterdemand projections was established for the future projections. This was considered inestablishing the design criteria.
Page 3
Memorandum – Design Criteria Executive SummaryDecember 2010
Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final
iii) By changing the approach to reflect growth from the starting point as opposed to using thehorizon year projections only, there will be improved reconciliation between internalprocesses as well as improved accuracy with actual conditions. This approach will betterintegrate the process of monitoring uptake of single dwelling equivalents (SDEs), accountingfor committed SDEs and projecting future uptake rates of SDEs.
iv) In order to consider the need to change the design criteria, a review of available informationwas undertaken. Also a methodology of calculating and comparing the design criteria undermultiple analyses was undertaken to attempt to validate the recommendations.
Methodology
In attempt to provide a more defendable review process, it was determined to evaluate the designcriteria for both water and wastewater under multiple methodologies and reconcile the findings.
The principal methodologies used are as follows:
Water
1. Review historical plant production data to determine an equivalent criteria (inclusive ofresidential and employment requirements)
2. Review historical consumption data from billing to determine separately residential andemployment consumption
3. Utilize sample area consumption data to refine residential consumptions and employmentconsumptions using a cross section of areas throughout the Region. This process wasintending to determine trends in sub-categories such as low, medium and high densityresidential.
4. Review District Meter Area (DMA) analysis undertaken by the Region. This data set providesadditional information of cross section areas throughout the Region. It also provides anothercomparative for the equivalent criteria.
5. Review of the historical peaking factors at the plants
Wastewater
Given that there is limited data sets available for wastewater as there is not the same level of meteredbilling data for customers, the methodologies available are more limited.
1. Review historical plant treatment data to determine an equivalent criteria for average flows(inclusive of residential and employment requirements)
2. Further review of historical plant treatment data to analyze dry weather flow conditions3. Correlate the water use billing data with the plant dry weather flow to estimate residential and
employment criteria
The detailed analysis of these methods are provided in the December 2010 design criteria memos.
Page 4
Memorandum – Design Criteria Executive SummaryDecember 2010
Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final
The overview of the results from this analysis is summarized as follows:
Analysis of the different methodologies did not provide consistent comparative results thatcould be used to definitively recommend design criteria
The analysis for varied land uses also provided varied results with no clear pattern There were not sufficiently definitive results to provide support in changing the existing
Regional design criteria However, the overall plant service area analysis did validate and demonstrate reasonable
accuracy of using existing Regional design criteria There was sufficient information available to recommend different South Halton and North
Halton maximum day peaking factors There was sufficient information available to recommend same wastewater criteria for new
growth in South Halton and North Halton
Summary and Rationale
Water
Based on the design criteria review and analysis, it is recommended that the existing Regionalaverage day water design criteria be maintained for the South Halton lake based and North Haltongroundwater based system. As such, it is recommended that all new growth throughout the Regionutilize the common criteria below:
Average Day Water Design Criteria
Lpcd Residential 330
L/emp/d Industrial 302
Commercial 213
Institutional 74
Based on historical trending, the following maximum day and peak hour peaking factors should beused:
Water Design Criteria Max
PF
Peak
PF
Lake Based OAK, BURL, MIL,
GT1.9
3Groundwater
Based
MIL
1.6GT
ACT
Page 5
Memorandum – Design Criteria Executive SummaryDecember 2010
Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final
Wastewater
Based on the design criteria review and analysis, it is recommended that the existing South Haltonaverage day wastewater design criteria be maintained for the South Halton lake based systems andNorth Halton stream based systems. As such, it is recommended that all new growth throughout theRegion utilize the common criteria below:
Average Day Wastewater Design Criteria
Lpcd Residential 365
L/emp/d Industrial 410
Commercial 260
Institutional 135
The methodology used to determine peak wet weather flow remains valid and is being used in thismaster plan. The peak wastewater flow criteria of 0.286 L/s/ha is being applied to new growththroughout the Region for evaluating wastewater collection system capacity.
The rationale for these recommendations is as follows:
There is insufficient information to definitively recommend a change in criteria or recommendnew criteria classifications such as low, medium and high density residential.
The existing Regional criteria did closely match actual conditions when applied at the plantservice area level.
Historical and recent trends in water production and use and wastewater generation andtreatment are being considered and have been reflected in the updated approach using anew yearly starting point.
Decreasing water use trends are being accounted for in the 5% water efficiency approachand should not be double counted or further reduced in the base design criteria.
We expect to see similar water use and wastewater generation patterns for all new growthregardless of location. As such, it was considered reasonable to apply a common criteria toall new growth in either Burlington, Oakville, Milton or Halton Hills and only reflect uniquepeaking factors in South Halton and North Halton.
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011
APPEDIX B
Benefit to Existing and Oversizing Calculations
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges UpdateTechnical Report
Appendix B - Benefit to Existing Calculations
Water
Regional ID Project DescriptionTotal Project Cost
Estimate2012$
BTE % (see demand
tables for service areas)
BTE2012$
Benefit to Existing Rationale
6605 W 750 mm WM Second feed to Washburn Reservoir $24,096,000 82% $19,759,000Existing water system has constraints in water supply feed to Washburn Reservoir. This project is required to support water supply under existing conditions (existing rated pumping capacity of Washburn) as well as to support supply to future growth in Burlington. Washburn Pumping Station also supports transfer to Oakville system and growth in Oakville. Demand percentage based on Burlington demands and 20 MLD transfer to Oakville. 142 MLD existing / 172 MLD total future = 82%.
6661 W 900 mm Second Feedermain to Davis Road Booster Pumping Station $14,171,000 48% $6,802,000Existing water system has constraints in water supply feed to 8th Line trunk infrastructure. This project is required to support water supply under existing conditions (existing rated pumping capacity of Davis Rd Pumping Station) as well as to support supply to future growth in Oakville, Milton and Georgetown. Demand percentage based on Oakville, Milton and Georgetown service area.
6665 W 400 mm Zone B4 WM between Tyandanga Reservoir and Beaufort Reservoir (Twin existing WM) $6,602,000 92% $6,081,000There are existing constraints with the transfer capacity to the Beaufort Reservoir and in the Burlington B4 pressure zone. This project is required to support existing demands and future demands in Burlington. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.
6669 W 4.5 ML storage expansion at Tyandanga Reservoir, within existing site. $4,660,000 92% $4,292,000There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. This facility provides floating storage as well as operational storage for supply to downstream pressure zones. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.
There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands Demand percentage6670 W 2.5 ML storage expansion at Beaufort Reservoir Expansion, new site required. $3,275,000 92% $3,016,000
There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. Demand percentagebased on Burlington service area.
6601 W 7.8 ML/d expansion at Beaufort Pumping Station, new site required. $2,015,000 92% $1,856,000There is currently operational constraints and site constraints at the existing pumping station. This project is required to alleviate these constraints and support continued supply to existing customers and support future demands. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.
6671 W 6.6 ML/d expansion at Brant St Pumping Station, within existing building. $735,000 92% $677,000There is currently operational constraints at the existing pumping station. This project is required to alleviate these constraints and support continued supply to existing customers and support future demands. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.
6602 W 7.5 ML storage expansion at Waterdown Reservoir, within existing site. $7,767,000 92% $7,154,000There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. This facility provides floating storage as well as operational storage for supply to downstream pressure zones. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.
6672 W 11.5 ML storage expansion at Brant St Reservoir, within existing site. $12,321,000 92% $11,348,000There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. This facility provides floating storage as well as operational storage for supply to downstream pressure zones. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.
6673 W 5.5 ML storage expansion at Mount Forest Reservoir, within existing site. $5,696,000 92% $5,246,000There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. This facility provides floating storage as well as operational storage for supply to downstream pressure zones. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.
6674 W 13.5 ML storage expansion at Washburn Reservoir, within existing site. $13,980,000 82% $11,464,000Existing water system has constraints in water storage at the Washburn Reservoir and transfer capacity for downstream pressure zones. This project is required to support water supply under existing conditions (existing rated capacity of Washburn) as well as to support supply to future growth in Burlington. Washburn Reservoir and Pumping Station also supports transfer to Oakville system and growth in Oakville. Demand percentage based on Burlington demands and 20 MLD transfer to Oakville. 142 MLD existing / 172 MLD total future = 82%.
6676 W Acton Artificial Recharge Study $500,000 50% $250,000This project is required to maximize the available capacity of the groundwater well supplies. This study will review application to existing well supplies and existing rated capacity as well as for future well supplies. The outcome and determination of the application for existing vs future capacity is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that there will be equal benefit to existing and future.
6677 W Acton Artificial Recharge Capital Works $6,300,000 50% $3,150,000This project is required to maximize the available capacity of the groundwater well supplies. This project represents the potential capital resulting from the study recommendations. The outcome and determination of the application for existing vs future capacity is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that there will be equal benefit to existing and future.
6678 W Georgetown Artificial Recharge Study $500,000 50% $250,000This project is required to maximize the available capacity of the groundwater well supplies. This study will review application to existing well supplies and existing rated capacity as well as for future well supplies. The outcome and determination of the application for existing vs future capacity is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that there will be equal benefit to existing and future.
6679 W Georgetown Artificial Recharge Capital Works $29,600,000 50% $14,800,000This project is required to maximize the available capacity of the groundwater well supplies. This project represents the potential capital resulting from the study recommendations. The outcome and determination of the application for existing vs future capacity is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that there will be equal benefit to existing and future.
6680 W Oakville WPP Intake Pipe Extension (Design) $1,500,000 10% $150,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.
6681 W Oakville WPP Intake Pipe Extension (Construction) $8,500,000 10% $850,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.
6682 WClass EA Study of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d. (Including Standby Generator and Intake Pipe Extension)
$1,000,000 10% $100,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.
6683 W Design of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d. $3,464,000 10% $346,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.
6684 W Construction of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d. $20,803,000 10% $2,080,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.
4950 W SCADA Master Plan Review for Water Purification Plants and Distribution Systems (REG) $200,000 63% $126,000This is a Region wide project. The project will address existing and future facilities. This project will support existing operational requirements for existing capacity as well as future operational requirements for future capacity. Demand percentage based on Region wide service area.
5917 W SCADA System Network Architecture Improvement Program (REG) $150,000 63% $95,000This is a Region wide project. The project will address existing and future facilities. This project will support existing operational requirements for existing capacity as well as future operational requirements for future capacity. Demand percentage based on Region wide service area.
This is a Region wide project The project will address existing and future facilities This project will support existing operational requirements for existing capacity as well as future operational requirements for future5918 W Electrical Utility Meter Monitoring Installation Program (SCADA) (REG) $190,000 63% $120,000
This is a Region wide project. The project will address existing and future facilities. This project will support existing operational requirements for existing capacity as well as future operational requirements for futurecapacity. Demand percentage based on Region wide service area.
6318 W 300mm WM on No 14 Sideroad from Tremaine Rd. to Milton Reservoir (MIL) $1,045,515 78% $815,000This project is integral to the groudwater supply strategy for Milton This project is required to support the existing users and related infil in the Milton groundwater service area only. Demand percentage based on Milton groundwater service area.
6663 W 400 mm WM from 9th Line on easement to Bristol Circle (Zone O3) $3,008,000 90% $2,707,000 This project is primarily related to providing additonal security of supply to the Bristol Circle area and benefit to the existing users. This project does support some overall secirty of supply to the O3 pressure zone through the PRV back feed from O4. As such, 10% was considered DC eligible.
$172,078,515 $103,534,000 Sub-Total Water
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges UpdateTechnical Report
Appendix B - Benefit to Existing Calculations
Wastewater
Regional ID Project DescriptionTotal Project Cost
Estimate2012$
BTE % (see demand
tables for service areas)
BTE2012$
Benefit to Existing Rationale
4810 S Long Term Biosolids Implementation Plan $20,780,000 59% $12,260,000This project is focused on implementing strategies identiified in the 2009 Biosolids Management Master Plan. It will support existing and future users within the Region. The 2009 Biosolids Management Master Plan identified 59% benefit to existing
6541 S Deep Trunk Sewer on Rebecca St and Lakeshore Rd W from Wilson St to Oakville SW WWTP $45,501,590 35% $15,926,000This project will service the UGC growth in Oakville as well as relieve the existing constraints along the Rebecca St Trunk Sewer. The Benefit to Existing is based on transferred flow from existing areas resulting from WWPS decommissioning relative to the capacity of the new trunk sewer.
6528, 6544, 6545, 6547
S Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Intensification Areas $1,487,000 28% $412,000Four wastewater pumping station upgrades are required due to intensification. These projects will support existing areas as well as new growth within the urban boundary. For projects where deficiencies exist, the benefitto existing is calcualted based on the ratio between the current flow above the existing firm capacity and future flow above the existing firm capacity.
$67,768,590 $28,598,000Sub-Total Wastewater
$239,847,105 $132,132,000Totals
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges UpdateTechnical Report
Appendix B - Benefit to Existing CalculationsService Area Water Demands
Pressure Zone2011 Max (MLD)
Day Demand2031 Max (MLD)
Day DemandGrowth (MLD) % Flow Growth % Flow Existing
B1 61.36 68.79 7.43 11% 89%B1A 8.63 9.25 0.63 7% 93%
B3A, B4A, B5A 0.59 1.19 0.60 51% 49%B1B 0.16 0.18 0.01 9% 91%B2 30.40 31.94 1.54 5% 95%B3 32.86 35.00 2.14 6% 94%B4 5.60 5.83 0.23 4% 96%B5 0.18 0.17 -0.01 0% 100%
M4L 5.63 82.03 76.40 93% 7%M5L 43.20 84.26 41.06 49% 51%M5G 12.31 15.30 2.99 20% 80%G6L 0.00 19.81 19.81 100% 0%
G5G, G6G, G7G 24.48 24.15 -0.33 0% 100%A9G 5.40 7.86 2.46 31% 69%O1 36.86 42.64 5.78 14% 86%O2 30.56 42.56 12.00 28% 72%
O2A 3.48 3.32 -0.16 0% 100%O3 47.15 55.74 8.59 15% 85%O4 11.35 43.67 32.32 74% 26%
Rural 12.21 12.44 0.23 2% 98%Glen Williams 1.02 1.14 0.12 10% 90%
Norval 0.25 0.29 0.04 14% 86%
Service Area2011 Max (MLD)
Day Demand2031 Max (MLD)
Day DemandGrowth (MLD) % Flow Growth % Flow Existing
Burlington 139.77 152.35 12.58 8% 92%
Oakville 129.40 187.94 58.54 31% 69%
Burlington and Oakville 269.17 340.28 71.11 21% 79%
Milton Groundwater 12.31 15.84 3.53 22% 78%
Milton Lake 48.83 165.75 116.92 71% 29%
Milton 61.14 181.59 120.45 66% 34%
South Halton 330.31 521.87 191.56 37% 63%
Acton 5.40 7.86 2.46 31% 69%
Georgetown Groundwater 24.48 23.21 -1.27 -5% 105%
Georgetown Lake 1.30 22.18 20.88 94% 6%
Georgetown 25.78 45.39 19.61 43% 57%
Halton Hills 31.18 53.25 22.07 41% 59%
Oakville, Milton Lake and Georgetown Lake
179.52 375.86 196.34 52% 48%
Region 361.49 575.13 213.64 37% 63%
Region of Halton2012 Development Charges UpdateTechnical Report
Appendix B - Oversizing Calculations
Regional ID Project DescriptionTotal Project Cost
Estimate2012$
Oversizing % Oversizing Portion
2012$Oversizing Rationale
6666 W750 mm zone M4L WM on James Snow Parkway from North Oakville to Milton. From Burnhamthorpe Rd W to Lower Base Line W (Incorporated From Bridge)
8,136,000$ 90% 7,322,000$
2031 water supply capacity to the Milton and Halton Hills service areas is primarily provided through the Zone 5 spine and the Zone 4 2nd spine. This feedermain provides additional security of supply to Zone 4 as well as provides improved level of service to Zone 4. The feedermain capacity will support future growth beyond 2031. It is estimated that the feedermain provides 10% benefit to the 2031 service area.
6699 WBurloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Design) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d
11,849,000$ 90% 10,664,000$
The total water supply capacity for the 2031 service area requires capacity just beyond 165 MLD at Burloak WPP. The expansion from 165 MLD to 220 MLD is triggered within the 2031 time period but the capacity is substantially required for post 2031 growth. 5.5 MLD of the 55 MLD expansion (10%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of capacity is oversizing.
6700 WBurloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Construction) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d includes Zone 1 Pumping expansion by 25 ML/D
76,008,000$ 90% 68,407,000$
The total water supply capacity for the 2031 service area requires capacity just beyond 165 MLD at Burloak WPP. The expansion from 165 MLD to 220 MLD is triggered within the 2031 time period but the capacity is substantially required for post 2031 growth. 5.5 MLD of the 55 MLD expansion (10%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of capacity is oversizing.
6770 WBurloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Class EA Study) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d includes Zone 1 Pumping expansion by 25 ML/D
1,323,000$ 90% 1,191,000$
The total water supply capacity for the 2031 service area requires capacity just beyond 165 MLD at Burloak WPP. The expansion from 165 MLD to 220 MLD is triggered within the 2031 time period but the capacity is substantially required for post 2031 growth. 5.5 MLD of the 55 MLD expansion (10%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of capacity is oversizing.
6701 W Kitchen Zone 3 Pumping Station expansion by 80 ML/d 12,000,000$ 67% 8,040,000$
Additional Zone 3 pumping capacity is required to support the 2031 needs. The next expansion at the Kitchen pumping station will require expansion to the building. This project will provide a pumping station building expansion to support the mature stateneeds beyond 2031. The additional capacity for Zone 3 up to 2031 is approximately 45 MLD. The total building expansion will support an additional 135 MLD. 45 MLD of the total 135 MLD (33%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of costs is oversizing.
5850 W1050 mm WM on Upper Middle Rd from Burloak Dr west to Appleby Line. Zone 2 feedermain. (Construction)
8,514,000$ 34% 2,855,000$
This feedermain will support water supply to meet the 2031 needs. This is also a critical feedermain for mature state post 2031 servicing. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 750 mm watermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1050 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1050 mm feedermain and a 750 mm feedermain.
5867 W 1200 mm WM on Britannia Rd from 4th Line to RR 25. Zone 4 feedermain. 19,529,000$ 32% 6,167,000$
The post 2031 servicing strategy will require a new water supply feed to Milton. It is anticipated that this feedermain will ultimately connect to Britannia Road and support supply to the Trafalgar feedermain. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 750 mm feedermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1200 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1200 mm feedermain and a 750 mm feedermain.
6367 W120 ML/d Burloak Pumping Station (Zone 2). (1,389 l/s) (Phase 1 50 ML/d pump installation, facility constructed to house future pumps)
12,522,000$ 67% 8,390,000$
This facility is required to meet the servicing needs for the 2031 service areas. This facility is also critical for the long term mature state strategy for post 2031 growth. The facility will be constructed to support the ultimate capacity. However, 40 MLD of the 120 MLD future capacity will be installed within the 2031 period. 40 MLD of the total 120 MLD (33%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of costs is oversizing.
6364 W1500 mm WM from Zone 2 Burloak PS to Kitchen Reservoir (Zone O1) (Construction)
53,062,000$ 10% 5,400,000$
This feedermain will support water supply to meet the 2031 needs. This is also a critical feedermain for mature state post 2031 servicing. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 1350 mm watermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1500 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1500 mm feedermain and a 1350 mm feedermain.
6365 W1800 mm WM from Burloak WPP to Burloak Zone 2 Booster Pumping Station (Zone O1) (Construction)
17,460,000$ 18% 3,200,000$
This feedermain will support water supply to meet the 2031 needs. This is also a critical feedermain for mature state post 2031 servicing. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 1500 mm watermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1800 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1800 mm feedermain and a 1500 mm feedermain.
6368 W1050 mm WM from Burloak Pumping Station (Zone 2) north on Burloak Dr to Upper Middle Rd (not including QEW crossing). Zone 2 feedermain. (construction)
6,515,000$ 42% 2,711,000$
This feedermain will support water supply to meet the 2031 needs. This is also a critical feedermain for mature state post 2031 servicing. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 750 mm watermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1050 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1050 mm feedermain and a 750 mm feedermain.
5945 S Mid-Halton new effluent sewer/outfall - Construction $ 90,000,000 29% $ 26,100,000
This project is required to provide additional outfall capacity to meet the 2031 needs as well as post 2031 needs. The outfall sewer capacity will be designed to match the ultimate site capacity of the Mid Halton WWTP. It has been determined that a 1800 mm outfall sewer would service the 2031 flows. It is estimated that a 2400 mm outfall sewer would service the ultimate site capacity. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1800 mm sewer and a 2400 mm sewer.
316,918,000$ 150,447,000$ Totals
AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report
RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011
APPENDIX C
Local Service Guidelines
Region of Halton 2012 DC Background Study
G2-1
2. LOCAL SERVICE POLICY
2.1 Water and Wastewater
The following guideline sets out in general the size of water and wastewater infrastructure that
constitutes a development charge project. Other infrastructure will be treated as a local service,
which is the direct responsibility of a landowner under a development agreement.
2.1.1 Watermains
Internal to the development (servicing of vacant lands)
• Greater than 400 mm:
Development charges main
• 400 mm or less:
Developer responsibility within subdivision agreement
External to the development (mains on existing roads but requiring a local
connection)
• 400 mm or greater:
Development charges main
• Less than 400 mm:
Developer responsibility within subdivision agreement
Exception to these policies is feeder mains required to connect from a well or reservoir
to the network. All feeder mains are considered to be development charges projects
regardless of the size of the main.
External watermains of any size required for a development to be connected to an
existing local main are considered to be the developers' responsibility.
Region of Halton 2012 DC Background Study
G2-2
2.1.2 Booster Stations and Reservoirs
All water booster pumping stations and reservoirs projects are considered to be
development charges projects.
2.1.3 Wastewater Mains
Internal or external (i.e., local connection) to the development
• Greater than 450 mm:
Development charges main
• 450 mm or less:
Developer responsibility within subdivision agreement
2.1.4 Lift Stations
Lift stations internal to a development and fed by mains which qualify for the
development charges project list are considered to be development charges projects.
Lift stations fed by mains that do not qualify for the development charges project list
are the responsibility of the developer
Existing lift stations that have to be expanded as part of a new development are the
responsibility of the benefiting developer and will be dealt with as part of the
subdivision agreement
The above policy guidelines are general principles by which staff will be guided in considering
development applications. However, each application will be considered on its own merits
having regard to, among other factors, the nature, type and location of the development and any
existing and proposed development in the surrounding area, these policy guidelines, the
location and type of services required and their relationship to the proposed development and
existing and proposed development in the area, and subsection 59(2) of the Development
Charges Act, 1997.