2010/10/06 Areva EPR DC - DRAFT Response to U.S. EPR ... · 6 From: BRYAN Martin (EXT) Sent:...

1

ArevaEPRDCPEm Resource

From: BRYAN Martin (EXTERNAL AREVA) [[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:54 AMTo: Tesfaye, GetachewCc: DELANO Karen (AREVA); ROMINE Judy (AREVA); BENNETT Kathy (AREVA); LENTZ Tony

(EXTERNAL AREVA); HALLINGER Pat (EXTERNAL AREVA); WILLIFORD Dennis (AREVA); RYAN Tom (AREVA)

Subject: DRAFT Response to U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386, FSAR Ch. 14, Attachments: RAI 386 Supplement 6 Response US EPR DC - DRAFT.pdf

Getachew, Attached is a draft response for questions: 14.02-151 14.02-152 14.02-156 14.02-158 14.02-159 14.03.08-2 Please let me know if the staff has questions or if these can be sent as final. Sincerely, Martin (Marty) C. Bryan U.S. EPR Design Certification Licensing Manager AREVA NP Inc. Tel: (434) 832-3016 702 561-3528 cell [email protected]

From: BRYAN Martin (External RS/NB) Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:31 PM To: 'Tesfaye, Getachew' Cc: DELANO Karen (RS/NB); ROMINE Judy (RS/NB); BENNETT Kathy (RS/NB); LENTZ Tony (External RS/NB) Subject: Response to U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386, FSAR Ch. 14, Supplement 5

Getachew, AREVA NP Inc. provided a schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the 24 questions in RAI No. 386 on June 3, 2010. Supplement 1, Supplement 2, Supplement 3, and Supplement 4 responses to RAI No. 386 were sent on July 15, 2010, August 12, 2010, August 26, 2010, and September 9, 2010, respectively, to provide a revised schedule. To provide additional time to interact with the NRC, a revised schedule is provided in this e-mail for the response to the questions. The schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the questions has been revised and is provided below:

2

Question # Response Date RAI 386 — 14.02-149 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-150 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-151 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-152 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-153 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-154 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-155 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-156 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-157 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-158 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-159 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-160 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-44 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-45 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-46 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-47 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-48 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-49 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-50 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-51 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-37 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-46 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-2 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-3 October 28, 2010 Sincerely, Martin (Marty) C. Bryan U.S. EPR Design Certification Licensing Manager AREVA NP Inc. Tel: (434) 832-3016 702 561-3528 cell [email protected]

From: BRYAN Martin (External RS/NB) Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 2:30 PM To: 'Tesfaye, Getachew' Cc: DELANO Karen (RS/NB); ROMINE Judy (RS/NB); BENNETT Kathy (RS/NB); LENTZ Tony (External RS/NB) Subject: Response to U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386, FSAR Ch. 14, Supplement 4

Getachew, AREVA NP Inc. provided a schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the 24 questions in RAI No. 386 on June 3, 2010. AREVA NP Inc. provided technically correct and complete draft responses to 11 of the 24 questions in “RAI 386 Supplement 1 Response – DRAFT.pdf” on July 8, 2010. A revised schedule was provided in Supplement 1 on July 15, 2010, in Supplement 2 on August 12, 2010, and in Supplement 3 on August 26, 2010. To allow time for interaction between AREVA and the NRC staff, a revised schedule for submittal of final responses is provided in this e-mail.

3

The schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the questions has been revised and is provided below: Question # Response Date RAI 386 — 14.02-149 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-150 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-151 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-152 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-153 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-154 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-155 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-156 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-157 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-158 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-159 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-160 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-44 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-45 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-46 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-47 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-48 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-49 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-50 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-51 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-37 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-46 October 28, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-2 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-3 September 23, 2010 Sincerely, Martin (Marty) C. Bryan U.S. EPR Design Certification Licensing Manager AREVA NP Inc. Tel: (434) 832-3016 702 561-3528 cell [email protected]

From: BRYAN Martin (External RS/NB) Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:27 PM To: 'Tesfaye, Getachew' Cc: DELANO Karen (RS/NB); ROMINE Judy (RS/NB); BENNETT Kathy (RS/NB); LENTZ Tony (External RS/NB) Subject: Response to U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386, FSAR Ch. 14, Supplement 3

Getachew, AREVA NP Inc. provided a schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the 24 questions in RAI No. 386 on June 3, 2010.

4

AREVA NP Inc. provided technically correct and complete draft responses to 11 of the 24 questions in “RAI 386 Supplement 1 Response – DRAFT.pdf” on July 8, 2010. A revised schedule was provided in Supplement 1 on July 15, 2010 and in Supplement 2 on August 12, 2010. To allow time for interaction between AREVA and the NRC staff, a revised schedule for submittal of final responses is provided in this e-mail. The schedule for technically correct and complete responses has been revised and is provided below: Question # Response Date RAI 386 — 14.02-149 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-150 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-151 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-152 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-153 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-154 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-155 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-156 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-157 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-158 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-159 October 14, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-160 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-44 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-45 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-46 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-47 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-48 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-49 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-50 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-51 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-37 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-46 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-2 September 23, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-3 September 23, 2010 Sincerely, Martin (Marty) C. Bryan U.S. EPR Design Certification Licensing Manager AREVA NP Inc. Tel: (434) 832-3016 702 561-3528 cell [email protected]

From: BRYAN Martin (EXT) Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 6:02 PM To: 'Tesfaye, Getachew' Cc: DELANO Karen (RS/NB); ROMINE Judy (RS/NB); BENNETT Kathy (RS/NB); LENTZ Tony F (EXT) Subject: Response to U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386, FSAR Ch. 14, Supplement 2

5

Getachew, AREVA NP Inc. provided a schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the 24 questions in RAI No. 386 on June 3, 2010. A revised schedule was provided in Supplement 1 on July 15, 2010. AREVA NP Inc. provided technically correct and complete DRAFT responses to 7 of the 24 questions in “RAI 386 Supplement 1 Response – DRAFT.pdf” on July 8, 2010. To allow time for interaction between AREVA and the NRC staff, a revised schedule for submittal of final responses for these 7 questions is provided in this e-mail.

The schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the questions has been revised and is provided below: Question # Response Date RAI 386 — 14.02-149 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-150 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-151 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-152 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-153 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-154 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-155 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-156 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-157 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-158 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-159 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-160 September 9, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-44 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-45 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-46 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-47 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-48 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-49 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-50 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-51 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-37 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-46 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-2 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-3 August 26, 2010 Sincerely, Martin (Marty) C. Bryan U.S. EPR Design Certification Licensing Manager AREVA NP Inc. Tel: (434) 832-3016 702 561-3528 cell [email protected]

6

From: BRYAN Martin (EXT) Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 1:03 PM To: 'Tesfaye, Getachew' Cc: DELANO Karen V (AREVA NP INC); ROMINE Judy (AREVA NP INC); BENNETT Kathy A (OFR) (AREVA NP INC); LENTZ Tony F (EXT) Subject: Response to U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386, FSAR Ch. 14, Supplement 1

Getachew, AREVA NP Inc. provided a schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the 24 questions in RAI No. 386 on June 3, 2010. AREVA NP Inc. provided technically correct and complete DRAFT responses to 7 of the 24 questions in RAI No. 386 on July 8, 2010. To allow additional time for interaction between AREVA and the NRC staff, a revised schedule for submittal of final responses for these 7 questions is provided in this e-mail (386-14.02-149, 150, 153, 154, 155, 157 and 160). The schedule for technically correct and complete responses to the questions has been revised and is provided below: Question # Response Date RAI 386 — 14.02-149 August 12, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-150 August 12, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-151 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-152 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-153 August 12, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-154 August 12, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-155 August 12, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-156 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-157 August 12, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-158 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-159 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-160 August 12, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-44 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-45 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-46 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-47 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-48 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-49 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-50 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-51 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-37 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-46 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-2 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-3 August 26, 2010 Sincerely, Martin (Marty) C. Bryan U.S. EPR Design Certification Licensing Manager

7

AREVA NP Inc. Tel: (434) 832-3016 702 561-3528 cell [email protected]

From: BRYAN Martin (EXT) Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 7:02 PM To: 'Tesfaye, Getachew' Cc: DELANO Karen V (AREVA NP INC); ROMINE Judy (AREVA NP INC); BENNETT Kathy A (OFR) (AREVA NP INC); LENTZ Tony F (EXT); RYAN Tom (AREVA NP INC) Subject: Response to U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386(4306,4418,4532,4349,2666,4512,4341), FSAR Ch. 14

Getachew, Attached please find AREVA NP Inc.’s response to the subject request for additional information (RAI). The attached file, “RAI 386 Response US EPR DC.pdf” provides a schedule since a technically correct and complete response to the 24 questions is not provided. The following table indicates the respective pages in the response document, “RAI 386 Response US EPR DC.pdf,” that contain AREVA NP’s response to the subject questions. Question # Start Page End Page RAI 386 — 14.02-149 2 2 RAI 386 — 14.02-150 3 3 RAI 386 — 14.02-151 4 4 RAI 386 — 14.02-152 5 5 RAI 386 — 14.02-153 6 6 RAI 386 — 14.02-154 7 7 RAI 386 — 14.02-155 8 8 RAI 386 — 14.02-156 9 9 RAI 386 — 14.02-157 10 10 RAI 386 — 14.02-158 11 11 RAI 386 — 14.02-159 12 12 RAI 386 — 14.02-160 13 13 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-44 14 15 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-45 16 16 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-46 17 17 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-47 18 18 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-48 19 19 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-49 20 20 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-50 21 21 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-51 22 22 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-37 23 23 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-46 24 24 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-2 25 26 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-3 27 27 A complete answer is not provided for the 24 questions. The schedule for a technically correct and complete response to these questions is provided below.

8

Question # Response Date RAI 386 — 14.02-149 July 15, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-150 July 15, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-151 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-152 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-153 July 15, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-154 July 15, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-155 July 15, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-156 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-157 July 15, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-158 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-159 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.02-160 July 15, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-44 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-45 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-46 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-47 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-48 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-49 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-50 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.02-51 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-37 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.03-46 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-2 August 26, 2010 RAI 386 — 14.03.08-3 August 26, 2010 Sincerely, Martin (Marty) C. Bryan U.S. EPR Design Certification Licensing Manager AREVA NP Inc. Tel: (434) 832-3016 702 561-3528 cell [email protected]

From: Tesfaye, Getachew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:52 PM To: ZZ-DL-A-USEPR-DL Cc: Keim, Andrea; Rasmussen, Richard; Dehmel, Jean-Claude; Bernal, Sara; Roach, Edward; Jeng, David; Hawkins, Kimberly; Ng, Ching; Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer; Miernicki, Michael; Colaccino, Joseph; ArevaEPRDCPEm Resource Subject: U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386(4306,4418,4532,4349,2666,4512,4341), FSAR Ch. 14

Attached please find the subject requests for additional information (RAI). A draft of the RAI was provided to you on April 6, 2010, and discussed with your staff on May 4, 2010. Drat RAI Question 14.03.02-47 was modified as a result of that discussion. The schedule we have established for review of your application assumes technically correct and complete responses within 30 days of receipt of RAIs. For any RAIs that cannot be answered within 30 days, it is expected that a date for receipt of this information will be provided to

9

the staff within the 30 day period so that the staff can assess how this information will impact the published schedule.

Thanks, Getachew Tesfaye Sr. Project Manager NRO/DNRL/NARP (301) 415-3361

Hearing Identifier: AREVA_EPR_DC_RAIs Email Number: 2096 Mail Envelope Properties (BC417D9255991046A37DD56CF597DB7107CE7286) Subject: DRAFT Response to U.S. EPR Design Certification Application RAI No. 386, FSAR Ch. 14, Sent Date: 10/6/2010 10:54:06 AM Received Date: 10/6/2010 10:54:31 AM From: BRYAN Martin (EXTERNAL AREVA) Created By: [email protected] Recipients: "DELANO Karen (AREVA)" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "ROMINE Judy (AREVA)" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "BENNETT Kathy (AREVA)" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "LENTZ Tony (EXTERNAL AREVA)" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "HALLINGER Pat (EXTERNAL AREVA)" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "WILLIFORD Dennis (AREVA)" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "RYAN Tom (AREVA)" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "Tesfaye, Getachew" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None Post Office: AUSLYNCMX02.adom.ad.corp Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 16509 10/6/2010 10:54:31 AM RAI 386 Supplement 6 Response US EPR DC - DRAFT.pdf 480451 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Response to

Request for Additional Information No. 386, Supplement 4 (4306, 4418, 4532, 4349, 2666, 4512, 4341), Revision 0, Supplement 6

5/4/2010

U. S. EPR Standard Design Certification AREVA NP Inc.

Docket No. 52-020 SRP Section: 14.02 - Initial Plant Test Program - Design Certification and New

License Applicants SRP Section: 14.03.02 - Structural and Systems Engineering - Inspections, Tests,

Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria SRP Section: 14.03.03 - Piping Systems and Components - Inspections, Tests,

Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria SRP Section: 14.03.08 - Radiation Protection Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and

Acceptance Criteria

Application Section: SRP 14.02 (NUREG 0800)

QUESTIONS for Quality and Vendor Branch 2 (ESBWR/ABWR) (CQVB) QUESTIONS for Health Physics Branch (CHPB)

QUESTIONS for Structural Engineering Branch 2 (ESBWR/ABWR Projects) (SEB2) QUESTIONS for Engineering Mechanics Branch 2 (ESBWR/ABWR Projects)

(EMB2)DRAFT

gineergine ing nce Criteria nce Criter

Components - InspComponents -ceptance Criteria ceptance Criteria

ection Inspectionstion Inspe , Tptance Criteria ptance Crite

ection: n: SRP 14.02 (NSRP 14.02 (N

lity and Vendor Brlity and Vendor B anTIONS for Health PhIONS for Health Ph

ctural Engineering Bctural Engineering Bor Engineering Mechor Engineering Me

AREVA NP Inc.

Response to Request for Additional Information No. 386, Supplement 6 U.S. EPR Design Certification Application Page 2 of 9

Question 14.02-151:

Follow-up to RAI 313, Question 14.02-128

The response to RAI 14.02-128 refers to the criteria said to be contained in FSAR Section 9.3.2, Table 9.3.2-2 (Secondary Side). However, the current version of Table 9.3.2-2 does not provide this level of detail and the response does not commit to update Table 9.3.2-2 to ensure that the revised acceptance criteria are complemented with supporting FSAR data. The response should include a commitment to a parallel revision of Table 9.3.2-2 to ensure consistency.

Response to Question 14.02-151:

U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Table 9.3.2-2—Secondary Side Sampling Points will be revised to include process instrument parameters.

Laboratory equipment used to measure grab samples is site-specific and is not specified in the U.S. EPR FSAR.

U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Section 14.2.12.7.13, Subsection 5.1.4 and Section 14.2.12.18.5, Subsection 5.4 will be revised to reflect that laboratory equipment used to measure grab samples is site-specific and is not specified in the U.S. EPR FSAR.

FSAR Impact:

U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Table 9.3.2-2 and Sections 14.2.12.7.13 and 14.2.12.18.5 will be revised as described in the response and indicated on the enclosed markup.

DRAFTite-specific and iite-specif

section 5.1.4 and Sectiosection 5.1.4 and Sectioratory equipment usedatory equipm

n the U.S. EPR FSAR. S. EPR

2-2 and Sections 14.2.12-2 and Sections 14.2.1onse and indicated on tonse and indicate

AREVA NP Inc.


Question 14.02-152:


The response to RAI 14.02-129 refers to the criteria said to be contained in FSAR Section 9.3.2, Table 9.3.2-2 (Secondary Side). However, the current version of Table 9.3.2-2 does not provide this level of detail and the response does not commit to update Table 9.3.2-2 to ensure that the revised acceptance criteria are complemented with supporting FSAR data. The response should commit to a parallel revision of Table 9.3.2-2 to ensure consistency.


Refer to the Response to RAI 386, Question 14.02-151.

FSAR Impact:

The U.S. EPR FSAR will not be changed as a result of this question. this question. this question.

AREVA NP Inc.


Question 14.02-156:


The response to RAI 14.02-137 refers to the criteria said to be contained in FSAR Section 9.3.2, Table 9.3.2-2 (Secondary Side), but needs to include FSAR Table 9.3.2-1 (Primary Side). Also, the current versions of Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2 do not provide this level of detail and the response does not commit to update Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2 to ensure that the revised acceptance are complemented with supporting FSAR data. The response should commit to a revision of Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2 and include their citation in Test No. 155 to ensure consistency.


U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Table 9.3.2-1—Primary Side Sampling Points will be revised to include process instrument parameters.

Laboratory equipment used to measure grab samples is site-specific and is not specified in the U.S. EPR FSAR.

U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Section 14.2.12.18.6, Subsections 2.3 and 5.4, and Section 14.2.12.12.9, Subsection 5.3 will be revised to include a citation to U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2.

FSAR Impact:

U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Table 9.3.2-1 and Sections 14.2.12.18.6 and 14.2.12.12.9 will be revised as described in the response and indicated on the enclosed markup. AF

Tng Points wng Po

s is site-specific and is s is site-specific and

, Subsections 2.3 and 5ections

RAFd to include a citation tod to include a cita

9.3.2-1 and Sections 19.3.2-1 and Sections

DRresponse and indicatedsponse and indicated

AREVA NP Inc.


Question 14.02-158:


The response to RAI 14.02-139 refers to the criteria said to be contained in FSAR Section 9.3.2, Table 9.3.2-2 (Secondary Side). The test needs to also cite FSAR Table 9.3.2-1 (Primary Side) since Test No. 204 is for sampling the primary and secondary systems. Omitting a citation of Table 9.3.2-1 results in the definition of an incomplete set of acceptance criteria. In addition, the current versions of Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2 do not provide this level of detail and the response does not commit to update Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2 to ensure that the revised acceptance are complemented with supporting FSAR data. The response should commit to a revision of Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2 and include their citation in Test No. 204 to ensure consistency.


Refer to the Response to RAI 386, Question 14.02-151.

FSAR Impact:

The U.S. EPR FSAR will not be changed as a result of this question.

AFT. .

DRAF

a result of this questionof this

AREVA NP Inc.


Question 14.02-159:


The response to RAI 14.02-140 refers to the criteria said to be contained in FSAR Section 9.3.2, Table 9.3.2-2 (Secondary Side), but needs to include Table 9.3.2-1 for the primary side. The test is for failed fuel detection and the response should cite FSAR Table 9.3.2-1 (Primary Side) since Test No. 205 is for sampling the primary system. Omitting a citation of Table 9.3.2-1, results in the definition of an incomplete set of acceptance criteria. In addition, the current version of Table 9.3.2-1 does not provide this level of detail and the response does not commit to updating Table 9.3.2-1 to ensure that the revised acceptance are complemented with supporting FSAR data. Finally, the response refers to FSAR Section 11.5, Table 11.5-1 for supporting information. However, the current version of Table 11.5-1 does not provide this level of detail. The response should commit to a revision of Tables 9.3.2-1 and 11.5-1 and include their citation in Test No. 205 to ensure consistency.


Refer to the response in RAI 386, Question 14.02-156 concerning the revision of U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Table 9.3.2-1 and citation in U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Section 14.2, Test No. 205.

Refer to the responses in RAI 273, Supplement 4, Questions 11.05-1 through 11.05-10 and RAI 290, Supplement 1 and 4, Question 11.05-15 concerning the revision of U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Table 11.5-1.

FSAR Impact:


DRAFT

.5.59.3.2-19.3.2

-156 concerning the rev-156 concerning the revEPR FSAR Tier 2, SectPR FSAR Ti

ment 4, Questions 11.0ment 4, Question05-15 concerning the re15 concerning the

ot be changed as a resube changed as a resu

AREVA NP Inc.


Question 14.03.08-2:

Follow-up to RAI 43, Question 14.03.08-1

In response to RAI 43, Question 14.3.8-1, Supplement 1, Revision 0, the applicant revised Tier 1 to include additional detail for the Radiation Monitoring System, specifically ITAAC for the safety-related radiation monitors and a sentence describing the non safety related monitors. This revision is satisfactory except for the following which is needed to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR Part 52.47(b)(1).

As detailed in Staff RAI 292, Question 14.3.7-33, dated September 18, 2009, the staff evaluation of the applicant’s responses to prior RAIs (RAI No. 43, 105, and 116) indicates that the approach being used in addressing ITAAC is based on previous certified designs and that the EPR FSAR Tier 1 incorporates safety significant features credited to comply with the requirements of 10 CFR Parts 20, 50, 52, 73, or 100. However, 10 CFR Part 52.47(b)(1) states that a design certification application must contain the following:

“The proposed inspections, tests, and analyses, …that the licensee shall perform, and the acceptance criteria that are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that, if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met, a facility that incorporates the design certification has been constructed and will be operated in conformity with the combined license, the provisions of the Act, and the Commission’s rules and regulations.”

The staff concludes that Tier 1 safety significant radiation protection structures, systems and components (SSC), which the applicant has credited for complying with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20, do not contain sufficient detail to provide reasonable assurance that the facility will be constructed and operated in accordance with the Commission’s rules and regulations, specifically 10 CFR Part 20, GDC 63 and GDC 64. For this reason, RG 1.206 Part C.II states that additional Tier 1 and ITAAC detail should be provided for those SSCs necessary to demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR Part 20, although they are not safety-related SSCs. As an example, the AP1000 certified design which the applicant referenced in its response to RAI 43, Question 14.3.8-1, has recognized this and, therefore, includes Tier 1 information and ITAAC for the non-safety related radiation monitoring system relevant to demonstrating the design’s compliance with 10 CFR Part 20, GDC 63, and GDC 64 in accordance with 10 CFR Part 52.47(b)(1). Similarly, the ESBWR Design Certification Document (Rev. 6) includes specific ITAACs for area and airborne radiation monitors. The staff maintains that these radiation monitors are equivalent in purpose and safety significance to corresponding monitors in the U.S. EPR design, for which FSAR Tier 1, Rev. 1 does not provide equivalent ITAACs. Therefore the EPR’s non-safety related radiation monitoring system should include additional Tier 1 information and ITAACs in order to demonstrate compliance with NRC regulations.

It is recognized that the level of Tier 1 and ITAAC details for these systems will be less than that required for safety related SSCs. However, without sufficient details the staff cannot complete its evaluation and conclude, with reasonable assurance, that if the tests and inspections were performed and acceptance criteria were met, that all design commitments will be fulfilled and that the plant will be built and operated in accordance with the design certification and comply with applicable NRC regulations. Accordingly, the applicant is requested to provide Tier 1 information and ITAACs for the U.S. EPR radiation monitoring system as described above.

DRAFT

reditedrediteever, 10 CFRever,

owing: owing:

es, …that the licensee ses, …that the licensand sufficient to provideand sufficient to provide

and analyses are perfond analysess the design certificationesign c

the combined license, tthe combined licenulationsions.””

ety significant radiation ety significant radiation pplicant has credited fopplicant has credit

sufficient detail to providsufficient detail to proved in accordance with thn accordance with th

DRt 20, GDC 63 and GDC 20, GDC 63 a

and ITAAC detail shouldand ITAAC detail sliance with 10 CFR Parliance with 10 CFR PaP1000 certified desigP1000 certified dD, has recognize, has recogniz

y related ray related rD0 CF0 CF

AREVA NP Inc.


Response to Question 14.03.08-2:

AREVA NP based its development of U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 1 on Standard Review Plan (SRP) 14.3. SRP 14.3 states that not all information required for compliance with regulations and described in Tier 2 is required to be in Tier 1 and have ITAAC. SRP 14.3 describes a graded approach to selecting information from Tier 2 and including that information in Tier 1 with ITAAC. SRP 14.3 specifies specific non-safety-related criteria for inclusion in Tier 1 such as severe accident, anticipated transient without scram (ATWS), and fire protection.

U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2 material is screened to determine if it is ”safety significant” as described in U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Section 14.3. This screening process uses criteria developed from SRP 14.3, Appendixes A and C. The first process uses discipline checklists that include ITAAC criteria based on guidance in SRP, Section 14.3. For example, the discipline checklist for systems provides guidance to create ITAAC for the following features:

Major safety-related features.

Equipment that is seismic, EQ, or 1E.

Safety-related equipment.

Design features provided for severe accident mitigation, station blackout (SBO), and ATWS.

Significant system features identified in the applicable SRPs for the system.

Significant safety-related (and non-safety-related) functions derived from those listed in system design requirements documents.

The second process involves an expert review panel that selects safety-significant features based on assumptions and insights from key safety and integrated plant safety analyses in U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, where plant performance is dependent on contributions from multiple systems. This process is based on guidance in SRP 14.3, Page 14.3-21. Results of the expert review panel meetings are provided in U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2, Tables 14.3-1 through 14.3-7.

Specifically:

SRP 14.3, Appendix A, Page 14.3-16 states:

“The applicant should put the top-level design features and performance characteristics that were the most significant to safety in the Tier 1 design descriptions. The level of detail in Tier 1 is governed by a graded approach to the SSCs of the design, based on the safety significance of the functions they perform.”

“For example, safety-related SSCs should be described in Tier 1 with a relatively greater amount of information. Other SSCs should also be included based on their importance to safety, such as containment isolation aspects of non-safety systems. Some non-safety aspects of SSCs need not be discussed in Tier 1. This graded approach recognizes that although many aspects of the design are important to safety, the level of design detail in Tier 1 and verification of the key design features and performance characteristics should be commensurate with the significance of the safety functions to be performed.”

RAFT

heheeatureseature

nt mitigation, station blamitigation,

the applicable SRPs fo the applicable S

safety-related) functionty-related) functioncuments.

n expert review panel n expert review pan

DRAthnsights from key safety sights from key safety

plant performance is deperformance is deis based on guidance iis based on gu

DRgs are provided in U.S. gs are provided in U.

Page 14.3Page 14.3

AREVA NP Inc.


SRP 14.3, Page 14.3-17 states:

“The level of detail specified in the ITAAC should be commensurate with the safety significance of the functions and bases for that SSC.”


“The staff is particularly interested in ensuring that the assumptions and insights from key safety and integrated plant safety analyses in Tier 2, where plant performance is dependent on contributions from multiple systems of the design, are adequately considered in Tier 1.Addressing these assumptions and insights in Tier 1 ensures that the integrity of the fundamental analyses for the design are preserved in an as-built facility referencing the certified design. These analyses include flooding analyses, over-pressure protection, containment analyses, core cooling analyses, fire protection, transient analyses, anticipated transient without scram analyses, steam generator tube rupture analyses (PWRs only), radiological analyses, USIs/GSIs and TMI items, or other key analyses as specified by the staff. Therefore, applicants should provide information, in tabular form, in Section 14.3 that cross references the important design information and parameters of these analyses to their treatment in Tier 1. The cross-references should be sufficiently detailed to allow a COL applicant or licensee to consider whether a proposed design change impacts the treatment of these parameters in Tier 1.”


“Also, the scope of the ITAAC is consistent with the SSCs that are in the design descriptions. In general, each system has one or more ITAAC that verify the information in the design descriptions. The system ITAAC should verify that the key design characteristics and performance requirements of the SSCs are verified. The level of detail specified in the ITAAC should be commensurate with the safety significance of the functions and bases for that SSC.”

SRP 14.3, Appendix C, Page 14.3-24 states:

“This section is not repeated here, but it provides a discussion of what should be included as a ‘key feature’, and therefore by exclusion what does not have to be addressed in Tier 1and hence ITAAC.”

As is stated in this question, these non-safety-related monitors are less ”safety significant” than the safety-related monitors.

Lack of inclusion in U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 1 does not mean the COL applicant does not have to address the items described in U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2. The COL applicant must comply with U.S. EPR FSAR Tier 2 or take exception to it. Further evidence of this is provided in the inspection manual chapters have separate chapters on ITAAC (IMC 2503) inspections and non-ITAAC (2504) inspections.

FSAR Impact:


DRAFT

n, transn, trarupture anaruptu

her key analysesher key antion, in tabular form, intion, in tabular f

n and parameters of then and parameters of uld be sufficiently detailuld be sufficiently detail

proposed design changoposed des

tates: s:

s consistent with the SSs consistent with the SSch system has one or mch system has one

The system ITAAC shouThe system ITAAC shrements of the SSCs arments of the SSCs ar

mmensurate with the sammensurate w

x C, Page 14.3-24 stx C, Page 14.3-2Depeated heepeated hereforerefore

U.S. EPR Final Safety Analysis Report Markups

DRAFT

U.S. EPR FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

Tier 2 Revision 3—Interim Page 9.3-20

NOTE:

1. Specific properties of liquid and gaseous grab samples to be measured are identified in plant procedures.

Table 9.3.2-1—Primary Side Sampling Points

Process or EquipmentNumber of

Sample PointsType of Sample Process Measurement

LHSI / RHR 4 Grab See Note

CVCS 2 Process Boron, hydrogen, oxygen, conductivity and activity beta.

RCS 2 Process Boron, hydrogen, oxygen, conductivity and activity beta.

Pressurizer 1 Process Boron, hydrogen, oxygen, conductivity and activity beta.

CPS 6 Grab See Note

SIS accumulators 4 Grab See Note

RBWMS (boric acid pump) 2 Grab See Note

FPCS 2 Grab See Note

FPPS 2 Grab See Note

CDS 2 Grab See Note

CTS 2 Grab See Note

GWPS 4 Grab See Note

CSSS 1 Grab See Note

NIDVS (primary effluents) 3 Grab See Note

NSS (back feed tank) 1 Grab See Note

14.02-156

TTTTbb TFTGrabGrab

FTFTFTGrabG FTFTAFTGrabGrab

AFT

AFT

AFGrabGrab

AFAFRAF4 AGrabGrabAFRARA

1

RAGrabGrabARARA

33

RAG

RRADRA11RADRRA

DRSpecific properties of liqSpecific properties of liqDplant procedures.plant procedureDD

TTFTFTAFAFRARARADRD

U.S

. EPR

FIN

AL

SAFE

TY A

NA

LYSI

S R

EPO

RT

Tier

2 R

evis

ion

3—

Inte

rim

Pag

e 9

.3-2

1

Tab

le9.

3.2-

1—Pr

imar

y Si

de S

ampl

ing

Poin

ts S

heet

1 o

f 3

Proc

ess

orEq

uipm

ent

Num

ber

of S

ampl

ePo

ints

Type

of

Sam

ple5

Proc

ess

Mea

sure

men

tR

ange

4R

espo

nse

Tim

e4Se

nsiti

vity

4

Max

imum

antic

ipat

eddr

ift b

etw

een

calib

ratio

ns4

LHSI

/RH

R4

Gra

bSe

e N

otes

1,2

CVCS

2Co

ntin

uous

Boro

n0.

015-

20 p

pb6

min

utes

± 3%

or 0

.005

pp

b,

whi

chev

er is

gr

eate

r

<1%

of r

eadi

ng

(per

yea

r)

Hyd

roge

n0-

10 p

pm20

seco

nds

± 3%

or ±

60

ppb,

whi

chev

er

is gr

eate

r

<1%

of r

eadi

ng

(per

yea

r)

Oxy

gen

0-20

,000

ppb

30 se

cond

s±

2 pp

b<1

% o

f rea

ding

(p

er y

ear)

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

02-2

,000

�S/

cm20

seco

nds

± 0.

1 °F

of

tem

pera

ture

<1%

of r

eadi

ng

(per

yea

r)

Act

ivity

(Bet

a)Se

e Ta

ble

11.5

-1

RCS

2Co

ntin

uous

Boro

n0.

015-

20 p

pb6

min

utes

± 3%

or 0

.005

pp

b, w

hich

ever

is

grea

ter

<1%

of r

eadi

ng

(per

yea

r)

Hyd

roge

n0-

10 p

pm20

seco

nds

± 3%

or ±

60

ppb,

whi

chev

er

is gr

eate

r

<1%

of r

eadi

ng

(per

yea

r)

Oxy

gen

0-20

,000

ppb

30 se

cond

s±

2 pp

b<1

% o

f rea

ding

(p

er y

ear)

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

02-2

,000

�S/

cm20

seco

nds

± 0.

1 °F

of

tem

pera

ture

± 0.

1 °F

of

tem

pera

ture

Act

ivity

(Bet

a)Se

e Ta

ble

11.5

-1

14.0

2-15

6

DRAFT

DSee

NSe

e N

DousousD

Boro

Bor

DHyd

roge

nH

ydro

genRyg

enenRA0-

20,0

00 p

p0-

20,0

0

RA0.

02-2

,000

�S/

cm02

-2,0

00 �

S/cm

AF5-2

0 pp

bFT6

min

ut6

min

utFT

DRAFFT

DDDRRAAFAFFTT20

secTTT

U.S

. EPR

FIN

AL

SAFE

TY A

NA

LYSI

S R

EPO

RT

Tier

2 R

evis

ion

3—

Inte

rim

Pag

e 9

.3-2

2

Pres

suri

zer

1Co

ntin

uous

Boro

n0.

015-

20 p

pb6

min

utes

± 3%

or 0

.005

pp

b, w

hich

ever

is

grea

ter

<1%

of r

eadi

ng

(per

yea

r)

Hyd

roge

n0-

10 p

pm20

seco

nds

± 3%

or ±

60

ppb,

whi

chev

er

is gr

eate

r

<1%

of r

eadi

ng

(per

yea

r)

Oxy

gen

0-20

,000

ppb

30 se

cond

s±

2 pp

b<1

% o

f rea

ding

(p

er y

ear)

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

02-2

,000

�S/

cm20

seco

nds

± 0.

1 °F

of

tem

pera

ture

<1%

of r

eadi

ng

(per

yea

r)

Act

ivity

(Bet

a)Se

e Ta

ble

11.5

-1

CPS

6G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

SIS

Acc

umul

ator

s4

Gra

bSe

e N

otes

1,2

,3N

/AN

/AN

/AN

/A

RBW

MS

(bor

ic

acid

pum

p)2

Gra

bSe

e N

otes

1,2

,3N

/AN

/AN

/AN

/A

FPCS

2G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

FPPS

2G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

CDS

2G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

CTS

2G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

GW

PS4

Gra

bSe

e N

otes

1,2

,3N

/AN

/AN

/AN

/A

CSSS

1G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Tab

le9.

3.2-

1—Pr

imar

y Si

de S

ampl

ing

Poin

ts S

heet

2 o

f 3

Proc

ess

orEq

uipm

ent

Num

ber

of S

ampl

ePo

ints

Type

of

Sam

ple5

Proc

ess

Mea

sure

men

tR

ange

4R

espo

nse

Tim

e4Se

nsiti

vity

4

Max

imum

antic

ipat

eddr

ift b

etw

een

calib

ratio

ns4

14.0

2-15

6DRAFT

Hyd

roge

nyd

roge

n

DR

Oxy

gen

Oxy

genRA

0-

RAductivityivitRA0.

02-2

,000

.0

2-2,

000

RAeta)eta)AN

/AA

AFN/A

N/AF

NN TN

/AFN

/AN

/ATN/A

T

DRAFT

DDRRARAAFAFFTTTTT

U.S

. EPR

FIN

AL

SAFE

TY A

NA

LYSI

S R

EPO

RT

Tier

2 R

evis

ion

3—

Inte

rim

Pag

e 9

.3-2

3

Not

es:

1.Sp

ecifi

c pr

oper

ties o

f liq

uid

and

gase

ous g

rab

sam

ples

to b

e m

easu

red

are

iden

tifie

d in

pla

nt p

roce

dure

s.

2.La

bora

tory

inst

rum

ents

use

d to

mea

sure

gra

b sa

mpl

es a

re id

entif

ied

in p

lant

pro

cedu

res.

Man

ufac

ture

r’s o

pera

ting

man

ual s

hall

be c

onsu

lted

for c

alib

ratio

n, m

easu

ring

, mai

nten

ance

, and

cle

anin

g an

d st

orag

e re

quir

emen

ts.

3.Ca

libra

ting

gase

s and

solu

tion

for i

nstr

umen

tatio

n ar

e pe

r the

man

ufac

ture

r’s o

pera

ting

man

ual.

4.V

alue

s are

typi

cal;

the

actu

al v

alue

s will

mee

t or e

xcee

d th

e lis

ted

para

met

ers.

5.Co

ntin

uous

on-

line

mon

itori

ng sy

stem

s will

be

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith A

STM

D 3

864.

6.Co

ntai

ns c

onta

inm

ent a

tmos

pher

e an

d IR

WST

.

NID

VS (

prim

ary

efflu

ents

)3

Gra

bSe

e N

otes

1,2

,3N

/AN

/AN

/AN

/A

NSS

(bac

kfee

d ta

nk)

1G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Seve

re A

ccid

ent

Sam

plin

g Sy

stem

(SA

SS)

2G

rab

See

Not

e 6

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Tab

le9.

3.2-

1—Pr

imar

y Si

de S

ampl

ing

Poin

ts S

heet

3 o

f 3

Proc

ess

orEq

uipm

ent

Num

ber

of S

ampl

ePo

ints

Type

of

Sam

ple5

Proc

ess

Mea

sure

men

tR

ange

4R

espo

nse

Tim

e4Se

nsiti

vity

4

Max

imum

antic

ipat

eddr

ift b

etw

een

calib

ratio

ns4

14.0

2-15

6

RAFT

grab

sam

ples

to b

e m

easu

grab

sam

ples

to b

e m

easu

Aampl

es a

re id

entif

ied

in p

ples

are

iden

tifie

d in

p

AFing, mainte

nanc

e, a

nd c

leg,

mai

nten

ance

, and

cl

AFper th

e m

anuf

actu

rer’s

op

per t

he m

anuf

actu

rer’s

op

FTlisted para

met

ers.

met

erTh A

STM

D 3

h A

STT

DRA

See

Not

e 6

See

Not

e 6

DRDRA

DRSee

Not

es

Not

DDDDDSee

See DDDDDRRA



Table 9.3.2-2—Secondary Side Sampling Points

Process or Equipment

Number of Sample Points Type of Sample

Process Measurement of Continuous Samples

SG blowdown 15 Continuous/grab Activity gamma, cation conductivity, specific

conductivity, sodium, and pH

Feedwater (upstream valve chamber)

1 Continuous/grab Specific conductivity, cation conductivity, pH and oxygen

Feedwater pumps discharge (combined with start-up

feedwater pump)

1 per pump (5 total)

Continuous/grab Hydrazine, specific conductivity, cation

conductivity, pH, O2 and Na

Main steam (upstream HP turbine)

4 Continuous/grab Cation conductivity, degassed cation conductivity and sodium

Main steam (downstream reheater)

2 Continuous/grab Cation conductivity, degassed cation conductivity and sodium

Reheater drains 4 Continuous/grab Cation conductivity, degassed cation conductivity and Na

Auxiliary steam system 1 Grab

Auxiliary steam condensate 1 Grab

Condensate pump discharge 1 Continuous/grab Specific conductivity, cation conductivity, O2 and Na

Condensate polisher discharge Site specific Continuous/grab Cation conductivity, O2 and Na

Condenser hotwells 6 Continuous Cation conductivity, O2 and Na

Moisture separator drains 2 Grab

HP heater drains 2 Grab

LP heater drains 2 Grab

Clean drains 1 Grab

Demineralized water storage tank

1 Grab

Closed cooling water system 1 Grab

Circulating water cooling water basin makeup

1 Continuous pH/ORP and specific conductivity

14.02-151

AFT

grabgrab

TCatio

Tcation cocaTnuous/grabnuou

FTCation conCatio

FTcation cotion c

FTContinuous/grabContinuous/grFTCatioFTGrabrabAFAFTTTFTAFRAF1 AGrabGrabARARA

11

RAContinuoCo

RARRADRArge RSite specificSite specificRACoCoRADRRA

DRlss

D6RDRDRor drainsor dra D22RDRDainsains D2DDDDDAFRARADRDRDDD

U.S

. EPR

FIN

AL

SAFE

TY A

NA

LYSI

S R

EPO

RT

Tier

2 R

evis

ion

3—

Inte

rim

Pag

e 9

.3-2

5

Tab

le9.

3.2-

2—Se

cond

ary

Side

Sam

plin

g Po

ints

She

et 1

of 5

Proc

ess

or

Equi

pmen

t

Num

ber

of S

ampl

e Po

ints

Type

of

Sam

ple5

Proc

ess

Mea

sure

men

t of

Con

tinuo

us

Sam

ples

R

ange

4R

espo

nse

Tim

e4Se

nsiti

vity

4

Max

imum

ant

icip

ated

dr

ift b

etw

een

calib

ratio

ns4

SG b

low

dow

n15

Cont

inuo

us/g

rab

Act

ivity

(g

amm

a)Se

e Ta

ble

11.5

-1

Catio

n Co

nduc

tivity

0.06

to 1

000

�S/c

m30

seco

nds

0.00

1 to

1 �

S/cm

(d

epen

ds o

n ra

nge)

± 1%

of m

easu

red

valu

e or

±

digi

t (w

hich

ever

is g

reat

er)

Spec

ific

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Sodi

um0.

1 –

1000

pp

b2

min

utes

±0.1

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

pH1-

11 p

H30

seco

nds

±0.0

2 pH

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er st

anda

rd

solu

tion

volu

me)

Feed

wat

er

(ups

trea

m

valv

e ch

ambe

r)

1Co

ntin

uous

/gra

bSp

ecifi

c Co

nduc

tivity

0.06

to 1

000

�S/c

m30

seco

nds

0.00

1 to

1 �

S/cm

(d

epen

ds o

n ra

nge)

± 1%

of m

easu

red

valu

e or

±

digi

t (w

hich

ever

is g

reat

er)

Catio

n Co

nduc

tivity

0.06

to 1

000

�S/c

m30

seco

nds

0.00

1 to

1 �

S/cm

(d

epen

ds o

n ra

nge)

± 1%

of m

easu

red

valu

e or

±

digi

t (w

hich

ever

is g

reat

er)

pH1-

11 p

H30

seco

nds

±0.0

2 pH

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er st

anda

rd

solu

tion

volu

me)

Oxy

gen

0-20

,000

pp

b30

seco

nds

± 2

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

14.0

2-15

1

FT30 seconds

FT±0

.02

.02

TFTFT0.

001

0.00

1

T(dep

ends

(dep

ends

FTAFT

30 se

cond

sse

conFTAF1000 1000 FAFFTFT

(d(d

FAFT

30 se

cond

s0

seco

nds

AFAF.06

to 1

000

to 1

00AF�S/cmcmAAFFT

AF30

se

ARAF

1-11

pH

1-11

pH

RARARAAF

RA0.1

– 10

00

0.1

–

RApp

b

RARAodiu

mod

iuRRAARA0.06

0.

06

R

�S/c

m�S

/

RDRA

Spec

ific

Spec

ific

DRConduct

ivity

uctiv

ity

DRDRCatio

n on

DConduct

ivity

duct

ivity

DRDAct

ivA

ctiv D(gamm

a)(g

amm

a

DDRDRA

DDDRRARAAFAFTTnd

snd

sTTFTT

U.S

. EPR

FIN

AL

SAFE

TY A

NA

LYSI

S R

EPO

RT

Tier

2 R

evis

ion

3—

Inte

rim

Pag

e 9

.3-2

6

Feed

wat

er

pum

ps

disc

harg

e (c

ombi

ned

with

star

t-up

fe

edw

ater

pu

mp)

1 pe

r pum

p (4

tota

l)Co

ntin

uous

/gra

bH

ydra

zine

0-

200

ppb

4 m

inut

es±2

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Spec

ific

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Catio

n Co

nduc

tivity

0.06

to 1

000

�S/c

m30

seco

nds

0.00

1 to

1 �

S/cm

(d

epen

ds o

n ra

nge)

± 1%

of m

easu

red

valu

e or

±

digi

t (w

hich

ever

is g

reat

er)

pH1-

11 p

H30

seco

nds

±0.0

2 pH

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er st

anda

rd

solu

tion

volu

me)

Oxy

gen

0-20

,000

pp

b30

seco

nds

± 2

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Sodi

um0.

1 –

1000

pp

b2

min

utes

±0.1

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Mai

n St

eam

(u

pstr

eam

HP

turb

ine)

4Co

ntin

uous

/gra

bCa

tion

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Deg

asse

d Ca

tion

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Sodi

um0.

1 –

1000

pp

b2

min

utes

±0.1

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Mai

n St

eam

(d

owns

trea

m

rehe

ater

)

2Co

ntin

uous

/gra

bCa

tion

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Deg

asse

d Ca

tion

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Sodi

um0.

1 –

1000

pp

b2

min

utes

±0.1

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Tab

le9.

3.2-

2—Se

cond

ary

Side

Sam

plin

g Po

ints

She

et 2

of 5

Proc

ess

or

Equi

pmen

t

Num

ber

of S

ampl

e Po

ints

Type

of

Sam

ple5

Proc

ess

Mea

sure

men

t of

Con

tinuo

us

Sam

ples

R

ange

4R

espo

nse

Tim

e4Se

nsiti

vity

4

Max

imum

ant

icip

ated

dr

ift b

etw

een

calib

ratio

ns4

14.0

2-15

1

FT0.

001

t.0

01 t

T(depend

s ode

pend

s oFTFT30

seco

nds

conFTF00 00FFFTFT

±0.1

TFTminutessTFTFT

(dep

(dep

FTAFT

30 se

cond

s30

seco

nds

AFAF6 to 1000 100AF/cmcmAAFFTTds

0.TAF

2 m

in

AFRAF

0.1

– 10

00

0.1

– 10

00 AFpp

bpbARARAAF

RA0-

20,0

00

0

RApp

bpp

b

RARAygenRRAARA

1-11

1-

11

RDRA

pHHDRRARR

��

DRCatio

n io

n

DRCond

uctiv

ityCo

nduc

tivity

DRDSpecifi

cSp

ecifi

c

DConduct

ivity

Cond

uctiv

DDHyd

rH

ydr DDDRDDDRRARAAFFTFTT

U.S

. EPR

FIN

AL

SAFE

TY A

NA

LYSI

S R

EPO

RT

Tier

2 R

evis

ion

3—

Inte

rim

Pag

e 9

.3-2

7

Reh

eate

r D

rain

4Co

ntin

uous

/gra

bCa

tion

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Deg

asse

d Ca

tion

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Sodi

um0.

1 –

1000

pp

b2

min

utes

±0.1

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Aux

iliar

y St

eam

Sys

tem

1G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Aux

iliar

y St

eam

Co

nden

sate

1G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Cond

ensa

te

Pum

p D

ischa

rge

1Co

ntin

uous

/gra

bSp

ecifi

c Co

nduc

tivity

0.06

to 1

000

�S/c

m30

seco

nds

0.00

1 to

1 �

S/cm

(d

epen

ds o

n ra

nge)

± 1%

of m

easu

red

valu

e or

±

digi

t (w

hich

ever

is g

reat

er)

Catio

n Co

nduc

tivity

0.06

to 1

000

�S/c

m30

seco

nds

0.00

1 to

1 �

S/cm

(d

epen

ds o

n ra

nge)

± 1%

of m

easu

red

valu

e or

±

digi

t (w

hich

ever

is g

reat

er)

Oxy

gen

0-20

,000

pp

b30

seco

nds

± 2

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Sodi

um0.

1 –

1000

pp

b2

min

utes

±0.1

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Tab

le9.

3.2-

2—Se

cond

ary

Side

Sam

plin

g Po

ints

She

et 3

of 5

Proc

ess

or

Equi

pmen

t

Num

ber

of S

ampl

e Po

ints

Type

of

Sam

ple5

Proc

ess

Mea

sure

men

t of

Con

tinuo

us

Sam

ples

R

ange

4R

espo

nse

Tim

e4Se

nsiti

vity

4

Max

imum

ant

icip

ated

dr

ift b

etw

een

calib

ratio

ns4

14.0

2-15

1

FT0 secondsT

± 2

pp2

pp

TFTFT000

000 F30 secon

ds0

seco

nFT0.

001

0.00

1

T(depend

s ep

ends

FTFFTFT

(de

(de

FTAFT

30 se

cond

s30

seco

nds

AFAF06 to 1000 100AFS/cmcmAAFFT

RAF

N/A

N/A

RARA1,2,3,3RARAAF

RA

N/A

N/

RADRA

e N

otes

1,2

,3N

otes

1,2

,3RARAAR0.0. R

pppp

RDRSodi

umSo

dium

DRDRDeg

asse

d Ca

tioD

egas

sed

Ca

DConduct

ivity

ctiv

DRDCaCa DCond

ucti

Cond

ucti

DDDRDDRDRRAAFAFTFTTte

stTTT

U.S

. EPR

FIN

AL

SAFE

TY A

NA

LYSI

S R

EPO

RT

Tier

2 R

evis

ion

3—

Inte

rim

Pag

e 9

.3-2

8

Cond

ensa

te

Polis

her

Disc

harg

e

Site

Spe

cific

Cont

inuo

us/g

rab

Catio

n Co

nduc

tivity

0.06

to 1

000

�S/c

m30

seco

nds

0.00

1 to

1 �

S/cm

(d

epen

ds o

n ra

nge)

± 1%

of m

easu

red

valu

e or

±

digi

t (w

hich

ever

is g

reat

er)

Oxy

gen

0-20

,000

pp

b30

seco

nds

± 2

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Sodi

um0.

1 –

1000

pp

b2

min

utes

±0.1

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Cond

ense

r H

otw

ell

6Co

ntin

uous

Catio

n Co

nduc

tivity

0.06

to 1

000

�S/c

m30

seco

nds

0.00

1 to

1 �

S/cm

(d

epen

ds o

n ra

nge)

± 1%

of m

easu

red

valu

e or

±

digi

t (w

hich

ever

is g

reat

er)

Oxy

gen

0-20

,000

pp

b30

seco

nds

± 2

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Sodi

um0.

1 –

1000

pp

b2

min

utes

±0.1

ppb

<1%

of r

eadi

ng (p

er y

ear)

Moi

stur

e Se

para

tor

Dra

ins

2G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

HP

Hea

ter

Dra

in2

Gra

bSe

e N

otes

1,2

,3N

/AN

/AN

/AN

/A

LP H

eate

r D

rain

2G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Clea

n D

rain

s1

Gra

bSe

e N

otes

1,2

,3N

/AN

/AN

/AN

/A

Dem

iner

aliz

ed

wat

er st

orag

e ta

nk

1G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Tab

le9.

3.2-

2—Se

cond

ary

Side

Sam

plin

g Po

ints

She

et 4

of 5

Proc

ess

or

Equi

pmen

t

Num

ber

of S

ampl

e Po

ints

Type

of

Sam

ple5

Proc

ess

Mea

sure

men

t of

Con

tinuo

us

Sam

ples

R

ange

4R

espo

nse

Tim

e4Se

nsiti

vity

4

Max

imum

ant

icip

ated

dr

ift b

etw

een

calib

ratio

ns4

14.0

2-15

1

FTN/ATN

/AN

/A

TFTAFT

/A/AAN

/AN

/A

AFT

AFFT

AF2

min

ute

min

ute

AFAF0.1

– 10

00

1000

AFppbbAAAAFFAF303

ARAF

0-20

,000

20

,000

RApp

bpp

b

RARAenRAAF

RA0.06

to 1

006

to

RA�S

/cm

�S

RADRA

Catio

n Ca

tionRductivityductivityRRAAR0.0. R

pppp

RDRSodi

umSo

dium

DRDROxy

gen

gen

DDCaCa DCond

ucti

Cond

ucti

DDDRDDRDRRAAFAFFTTTT

U.S

. EPR

FIN

AL

SAFE

TY A

NA

LYSI

S R

EPO

RT

Tier

2 R

evis

ion

3—

Inte

rim

Pag

e 9

.3-2

9

Not

es:

1.Sp

ecifi

c pr

oper

ties o

f liq

uid

and

gase

ous g

rab

sam

ples

to b

e m

easu

red

are

iden

tifie

d in

pla

nt p

roce

dure

s.

2.La

bora

tory

inst

rum

ents

use

d to

mea

sure

gra

b sa

mpl

es a

re id

entif

ied

in p

lant

pro

cedu

res.

Man

ufac

ture

r’s o

pera

ting

man

ual s

hall

be c

onsu

lted

for c

alib

ratio

n, m

easu

ring

, mai

nten

ance

, and

cle

anin

g an

d st

orag

e re

quir

emen

ts.

3.Ca

libra

ting

gase

s and

solu

tion

for i

nstr

umen

tatio

n ar

e pe

r the

man

ufac

ture

r’s o

pera

ting

man

ual.

4.V

alue

s are

typi

cal;

the

actu

al v

alue

s will

mee

t or e

xcee

d th

e lis

ted

para

met

ers.

5.Co

ntin

uous

on-

line

mon

itori

ng sy

stem

s will

be

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith A

STM

D 3

864.

Clos

ed

Cool

ing W

ater

Sy

stem

1G

rab

See

Not

es 1

,2,3

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Circ

ulat

ing

Wat

er C

oolin

g W

ater

Bas

in

Mak

eup

1Co

ntin

uous

pH1-

11 p

H±0

.02

pH<1

% o

f rea

ding

(per

stan

dard

so

lutio

n vo

lum

e)

Spec

ific

Cond

uctiv

ity0.

06 to

100

0 �S

/cm

30 se

cond

s0.

001

to 1

�S/

cm

(dep

ends

on

rang

e)±

1% o

f mea

sure

d va

lue

or ±

di

git (

whi

chev

er is

gre

ater

)

Tab

le9.

3.2-

2—Se

cond

ary

Side

Sam

plin

g Po

ints

She

et 5

of 5

Proc

ess

or

Equi

pmen

t

Num

ber

of S

ampl

e Po

ints

Type

of

Sam

ple5

Proc

ess

Mea

sure

men

t of

Con

tinuo

us

Sam

ples

R

ange

4R

espo

nse

Tim

e4Se

nsiti

vity

4

Max

imum

ant

icip

ated

dr

ift b

etw

een

calib

ratio

ns4 N

ext F

ile

14.0

2-15

1

RAFT

grab

sam

ples

to b

e m

easu

grab

sam

ples

to b

e

Aampl

es a

re id

entif

ied

in p

ples

are

iden

tifie

d in

p

AFing, mainte

nanc

e, a

nd c

leg,

mai

nten

ance

, and

cl

AFper th

e m

anuf

actu

rer’s

op

per t

he m

anuf

actu

rer’s

op

FTlisted para

met

ers.

met

erTh ASTM D 3h ASTTRA0.

06 t

.06

t

R

�S/c

m�S

/

RDRA

Spec

ific

Spec

ific

DRConduct

ivity

duct

ivityRDRpHHDRDususDDDe

No

e N

o DDDRA

DDRRA



�� Verify power-operated valves fail upon loss of motive power as designed (refer to Section 9.3.2).

�� Verify that continuous monitors and sample flow rate meets design requirements.

�� Check electrical independence and redundancy of power supplies for safety-related functions by selectively removing power and determining loss of function.

4.0 DATA REQUIRED

�� Setpoints at which alarms and interlocks occur.

�� Sampling flow rate from each sample point.

�� Analytical instrument data.

�� Valve performance data, where required.

�� Valve position indication.

�� Position response of valves to loss of motive power.

5.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

�� The SECSS meets design requirements (refer to Section 9.3.2):

�� SECSS alarms, interlocks, and controls (manual and automatic) function as designed.

�� SECSS valves perform as designed (i.e., opening times, closing times, and pressure/temperature controls).

�� SECSS meet design requirements for representative samples.�� Continuous and chemistry lab instrumentation used to analyze

SECSS parameters described in Table 9.3.2-2 will meet the design requirements for the measurements. This includes, but is not limited to, the following (that could adversely impact the ability to accurately measure the parameters described in Table 9.3.2-2):� Range.� Response time.� Sensitivity.� Maximum anticipated drift between calibrations.

� Verify that safety-related components meet electrical independence and redundancy requirements.

14.02-151 DRAFT

required.requir

ves to loss of motive powves to loss of motive p

eets design requirementseets design require

ECSS alarms, interlocks, aalarms, interlocks, afunction as designed.function as designed.

SECSS valves perforSECSS valvestimes, and pressumes, and pres

�� SECSS meet dSECSS meet d��

SECSSSECSdesiesiDRContinuoCSECSSSE

iDRDRDRDD



� Plant systems required to support testing are functional to the extent necessary to perform the testing or suitable simulation of this system is used.

�� Verify preoperational Test #143 has been satisfactorily completed for radiation monitoring instrumentation.

3.0 TEST METHOD

�� Verify power sources to post accident related equipment.

�� Validate that external inputs are received and processed correctly by the appropriate system devices.

�� Verify that alarms and indication displays respond correctly to actual or simulated inputs.

�� Verify the functionality of required software application programs.

�� Verify the correct operation of data output devices and displays at applicable work stations and terminals.

4.0 DATA REQUIRED

�� Computer generated summaries of external input data, data processing, analysis functions, displayed information, and permanent data records.


�� The instruments that are designated as the post-accident monitoring instruments have been verified to include all of the instruments listed in the emergency operating procedures (Abnormal Operating Procedures, Emergency Operating Procedures, Severe Accident Mitigation Guidelines, etc.)

� The PAM functions as described in Section 7.5.

�� RadiationContinuous monitoring instrumentation used to perform post-accident monitoring that is described in Section 9.3.2Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2 will meet the design requirements for the radiation monitor. This includes, but is not limited to, the following (that could adversely impact the ability to measure the parameters described in Section 9.3.2Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2):

�� Range.�� Response time.�� Sensitivity.�� Maximum anticipated drift between calibrations.

14.02-156 DRAFT

ed softwared sof

of data output of data outp devind terminals.nd terminals.

ated summaries of externmmarietions, displayed informatiions, displayed inf

CRITERIARIA

e instruments that are dee instruments thatnstruments have been vnstruments have been

in the emergency opein the emergency opeProcedures, Emergocedures, EmergMitigation GuidMitigation

� The PAM fuhe PAM fu

�� RadiatiodiatDpost-post-SeSeDD



4.0 DATA REQUIRED

�� Reactor power level.

�� Temperature data in designated locations (i.e., general area and adjacent to major heat loads).

�� Equipment operating data.


�� Temperature conditions are maintained within the operable limits in areas as designed (refer to Section 9.4).

14.2.12.18.5 Sampling Primary and Secondary Systems (Test #204)

1.0 OBJECTIVE

�� To collect chemistry samples of the RCS and secondary at various power levels to record the following:

�� Boron concentration and boron-10 isotopic abundance.�� Concentration of non-radioactive elements and soluble

particulates.�� Measured pH of the fluids.�� Radio isotopic concentration data of the radioactive elements

(e.g., cesium, iodine, iron, cobalt). �� To demonstrate performance of permanent plant sampling and analysis

procedures, while confirming that primary and secondary chemistry requirements are being met.

�� To verify that the primary and secondary systems are operating within design limits. This procedure shall be performed at the following plateau:

�� 25 percent reactor power in accordance with RG 1.68.�� 50 percent reactor power in accordance with RG 1.68.�� 75 percent reactor power in accordance with RG 1.68.�� 98 percent reactor power in accordance with RG 1.68.

2.0 PREREQUISITES

�� The reactor is stable at the desired power level.

� Required sampling systems are functional and analysis instrumentation are calibrated using calibration gases and solutions as referenced in the radioactive and non-radioactive analyses of Table 9.3.2-2Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2.14.02-151

of the RCS and secof the RCS following:follo

tration and boron-10 isottration and boron-10 isotion of non-radioactive en of non-rad

ates.asured pH of the fluids.ured pH of the fluids

Radio isotopic concentratsotopic concentrat(e.g., cesium, iodine, ir(e.g., cesium, iodine, ir

o demonstrate performano demonstrate perforprocedures, while confiprocedures, while confrequirements are beiequirements are bei

�� To verify that thTo verify thdesign limits. design limitsplateau:teau

��

��



3.0 TEST METHOD

�� Samples shall be collected from the RCS and secondary system at various power levels and analyzed in the laboratory using applicable sampling and analysis procedures.

�� Collect samples at various process radiation monitors, perform analysis in the laboratory, and compare the samples with the process radiation monitor output.

�� Verify that primary and secondary sample results meet design limits.

4.0 DATA REQUIRED

�� Reactor power.

�� RCS and secondary temperature.

�� Boron concentration and boron-10 isotopic abundance.

�� Core average burnup.

�� Isotopic activities.


�� Measured activity levels are within their limits.

� Laboratory analyses and process radiation monitors agree with the within measurement uncertainties as designed (refer to Section 9.3.2), or investigation of the discrepancies has been initiated.

�� Samples of RCS and secondary fluids can be obtained from design locations as designed (refer to Sections 9.3.2 and 11.5).

�� Continuous and chemistry lab instrumentation used to analyze primary and secondary sampling parameters described in Table 9.3.2-1 and Table 9.3.2-2 will meet the design requirements for the measurements. This includes, but is not limited to, the following (that could adversely impact the ability to measure the parameters described in Table 9.3.2-1 and Table 9.3.2-2):


� Radiation monitoring instrumentation used to perform radiation monitoring that is described in Table 11.5-1 will meet the design requirements for the radiation monitor. This includes, but is not limited to, the following (that could adversely impact the ability to measure the parameters described in Table 11.5-1):

�� Range.�� Response time.

14.02-151 DRAFTn-10 isotopic abn-10 iso

A

tivity levels are within thivity levels are with

ory analyses and process rlyses and process rn measurement uncertainn measurement uncertain

investigation of the discrinvestigation of th

Samples of RCS and secSamples of RCS and selocations as designedocations as designed

��

DRContinuous Continuou and Rprimary and srimary andand dDDTableTameasureeasucouldcouldininDRDD51



�� Sensitivity.�� Maximum anticipated drift between calibrations.

14.2.12.18.6 Failed Fuel Detection (Test #205)

1.0 OBJECTIVE

�� To collect chemistry samples of the RCS and secondary at the specified power level to record the following:

�� Boron concentration and boron-10 isotopic abundance.�� Concentration of non-radioactive elements and soluble

particulates.�� Measured pH of the fluids.�� Radioisotopic concentration data of the radioactive elements

(e.g., cesium, iodine, strontium, barium, cerium, and noble gases).

�� To demonstrate performance of permanent plant sampling and analysis procedures. There is typically some RCS activity from tramp, fuel dust that is on the outer surface of the cladding.

�� To perform a cross-check of the failed fuel monitor instrumentation.

�� This test shall be performed at the following power plateaus:

�� 25 percent reactor power.�� 98 percent reactor power.

2.0 PREREQUISITES

�� The reactor is stable at the desired power level.

� Required sampling systems are functional.

�� Calibrating gases and solutions are available for radioactive and non-radioactive analyses referenced in Table 9.3.2-2Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2.

3.0 TEST METHOD

�� Samples shall be collected from the RCS and secondary system at various power levels and analyzed in the laboratory using applicable sampling and analysis procedures.

�� Collect samples at various process radiation monitors, perform analysis in the laboratory, and compare the samples with the process radiation monitor output.

4.0 DATA REQUIRED

�� Reactor power.

�� RCS and secondary temperature.

14.02-156 DRAFT

on data oon datrontium, bariumrontium

ance of permanent plant sance of permanent pltypically some RCS activitypically some RCS activ

r surface of the cladding.urface of the

ross-check of the failed fross-check of th

hall be performed at the fbe performed at the

25 percent reactor pow25 percent reactor pow �98 percent reactor�98 percent r

REQUISITESQUISITES

�� The reactor is staThe reacto

� Required samequired sam

�� Calibratiibrradioaradioa9.39.3DD



�� Boron concentration and boron-10 isotopic abundance.

�� Core average burnup.

�� Isotopic activities.


�� Measured activity levels are within their limits.

� Laboratory analyses and process radiation monitors agree with the within measurement uncertainties as designed (refer to Section 9.3.2 or investigation of the discrepancies has been initiated.

�� Samples of RCS and secondary fluids can be obtained from design locations as designed (refer to Sections 9.3.2 and 11.5).

�� Chemistry labContinuous instrumentation used to analyze primary sampling parameters described in Table 9.3.2-2Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2 will meet the design requirements for the measurements. This includes, but is not limited to, the following (that could adversely impact the ability to measure the parameters described in Table 9.3.2-2Tables 9.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2):


� Radiation monitoring instrumentation used to perform primary system monitoring that is described in Table 11.5-1 will meet the design requirements for the radiation monitor. This includes, but is not limited to, the following (that could adversely impact the ability to measure the parameters described in Table 11.5-1):


14.2.12.18.7 Self Powered Neutron Detector Calibration (Test #206)

1.0 OBJECTIVE

�� To perform a test on the Aeroball Measurement System (AMS) to verify the adequacy of time dependent decay constant functions of the vanadium steel flux measurement balls.

�� To perform a full core flux map using the following:

�� Moveable incore system - AMS.�� Fixed incore system - Self powered neutron detectors (SPND).

14.02-156

DRAFT

ntationntatinn Table 9.3.2Tab

Tequirements for thequiremento, the following (that to, the followin

asure the parameters desasure the parameters d.3.2-1 and 9.3.2-2.3.2-1 and 9.3FT):onse time.nse tim

ensitivity.vityMaximum anticipated Maximum anticipated

adiation monitoring instradiation monitoringmonitoring that is descrmonitoring that is descrequirements for the requirements for the limited to, the folllimited tomeasure the pameasure the

�� Ran��

��

FT

2010/10/06 Areva EPR DC - DRAFT Response to U.S. EPR ... · 6 From: BRYAN Martin (EXT) Sent:...

Documents

Transcript of 2010/10/06 Areva EPR DC - DRAFT Response to U.S. EPR ... · 6 From: BRYAN Martin (EXT) Sent:...