2009 Plant Health Field Observations

27
2009 Field Observations Auburn CEV 9-2-09

Transcript of 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Page 1: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

2009 Field Observations

Auburn CEV9-2-09

Page 2: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Our Position

• We have been very open minded and tried to be fair in all conclusions and judgments

• We have taken the farmer’s perspective• “Show me the benefits”• Kate and Garr Thomas have been very matter

of fact and have NOT distorted the facts.

Page 3: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Applications were timed perfectly

Page 4: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

We got good comments on the work

Page 5: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

We wondered what would happen

• Short window of time from application to harvest…How can Headline do anything in 45 days???

• Does plant health spray really make a difference?

• We did it right….good rate of carrier, right nozzles, used Hook surfactant to help make coverage even better……….

Page 6: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

AWSOME COVERAGE @ 15GPA

Page 7: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

THIS IS REALLY NEAT….WE NEVER WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THIS

WOULD BE SO DRAMATIC

Page 8: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Rejman Farms BMR SIDE BY SIDE

Third leaf from Ground!!Airplane would never do this good of

coverage!!!

Page 9: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Donald Bros. Grain Corn Side by Side

Notice the narrower ear at but and tip More consistent fill out, larger girth

Page 10: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Donald Bros. Grain Corn Side by Side

Consistently smaller ear size Time and again, larger ears

Page 11: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

THIS IS WHY…..Donald Bros.Leaf not able to produce as much

energy for fruit growth More Chlorophyll means more energy!

Page 12: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Bottom line for CEV Auburn

• We have key side by side’s out in market…very key accounts…a lot of visibility with whole county

• Miller machine must pay for itself!! This work would just be a part of the machines total work load

• This does stretch out revenue stream further in the summer….a very good thing for us

Page 13: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Now the rest of the story

Page 14: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

15 Different Side by Side Silage Trials

• All trials were with local farmers• Over 400 acres involved in the silage trials• 15 trials measured with reliable permanent

scales or TMR truck scales• One measured with on board yield monitor• All trials were with BMR silage varieties• All treated with 6 oz Headline, 4 oz Hook with

15 gallons water at about 90 PSI

Page 15: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

9.9% INCREASE IN MOISTURE CORRECTED TONS PER ACRE

9.9% INCREASE IN PURE DRY MATTER TONS PER ACRE

1.9 PERCENTANGE POINTS INCREASE IN MOISTURE

INCREASE IN MILK 2006 FORMULATED INCOME OF $352/A

MORE CONSISTENTLY HEALTH PLANTS SHOULD FEED MORE CONSISTENTLY

Page 16: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

One Sweet Corn Trial

• We were not sure if Headline could outperform the high rate Quilt

• It wound up paying for itself and making farmer more money

hybrid Harvest Measured Yield % Treatment INCOME/ACRE DIFFERENCEDate Entry Measured by Area Tons/Acre Difference Cost/Acre Less Treatment

Sierzenga Farms 10/12/2009 Quilt 14 oz truck scales 3.07 8.01 9.9% 30.43$ 690.47$ 9.5%Sierzenga Farms 10/12/2009 Headline 9 oz truck scales 2.93 8.80 0.79 35.60$ 756.40$ 65.93$

2009 CaroVail Headline Plant Health Sweet Corn Trial Results

Page 17: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations
Page 18: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

15 Field Size Trials

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15135

145

155

165

175

185

195

205

215

225

Headline Yield Trials

UntreatedTreated

Page 19: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Harvest Time Stalk Quality

Page 20: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Samples of Ears at Donald Bros.Can You See 13 to 18 Bu/Acre?

UT UT UT TR TR TR

UT UT TR TR

Page 21: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

The Grain Yield Triangle

Kernels/ear

Kernel Wt.Ears per Acre

Page 22: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Closer Shots of Anthracnose on untreated stalks

Page 23: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

It Takes All Three for Disease

Host • Susceptibility

Environment• Weather/External

forces/Bugs

Vector • Be in the Area.

Page 24: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

STRESS ON STRESS

G.L.S.

WEATHER

ANTHRAC.

SOIL INSECTS

Page 25: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

27DATA

29.3

23.2

22.6

14.7

10.6

6.3

3.1

1.3

0.1

18.1

61.1

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0

Gray Leaf Spot

Rust

Anthracnose

Northern Leaf Blight

Southern Leaf Blight

Northern Leaf Spot

Leaf Blight (unspecified)

Eyespot

Leaf Spot (unspecified)

Smut

Unknown disease

% of total brand acres

MULTIPLE DISEASE STRESSES

Page 26: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations

Increased incremental T.W. 78% of the time

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1049

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

Head Line Test Weight Trials

UntreatedTreated

Page 27: 2009 Plant Health Field Observations