2009-04-09 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of...

8/8/2019 2009-04-09 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California, Dkt #105:

1/36

Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 105 Filed 04/09/2009 Page 1 of 36

FILEDU.S. DISTRICT COURT

Zet'nikJ h Z .k ON:en-Joseph Ztmlk,osep eml __ emall_j,m45 .. .orthln1


2/36


Detailed listing of counsel and parties to whom this paper is addressed:2 a AU Overton r D e f e n d a n t s . . . w 1 l o . . - a r . e J : h . e g e - a n d - ~ u \ ' ; ) - - l l l - . . . u . u - - - - + - -

- ~ - - - - - - ----- - -- - - ~ -_._-----_. - -- - --------_._.3 LA Superior Court, ADR Services, and retired judge O'Brien.4 b) Att Amberg and Moldawsky - For themselves. They refuse to disclose the5 identity of clients, who may have engaged them, if any.6 c) Att Todd Boock - For Countrywide? Countrywide is today a subsidiary ofBank7 ofAmerica Corporation (BAC), although the court failed to notice that in8 its records. The legal Department ofBAC repeatedly instructs Plaintiff9 that Art Todd Boock is the only counsel, who is authorized to represent

10 BAC and Countrywide in Court, and explicitly denies that Bryan Cave,11 LLP, Amberg and Moldawsky are authorized to represent BAC.12 However, Art Todd Boock repeatedly claims that he is prohibited from13 communication with Plaintiff by some undisclosed unknown court order.14 He also claims, contradicting the office ofLegal Counsel, that Bryan15 Cave, LLP is authorized to represent BAC/CFC.16 The scheme, which is presumably meant to generate conditions where no17 counsel is in charge, is repetition of a scheme previously employed by18 Countrywide in the Court of the Honorable JeffBohm, US Judge,19 Houston Texas and described inMemorandum Opinion, March 5, 200820 (Docket # 31 in Zernik v Connor et al). That Memo was described by21 media as "rebuke" ofCountrywide's litigation practices. According to22 that Memo Countrywide had promised the Honorable JeffBohm not to23 engage again in such schemes. As we see here, the Honorable Jeff24 Bohm's trust in Countrywide was not necessarily well placed.25 Angelo Mozilo - No way to figure out which counsel represents him, if any.26 Sandor Samuels - No way to figure out which counsel represents him, if any.27 Timothy Mayopoulos, General Counsel, BAC - No way to tell who represents BAC,28 if any. BAC has failed to file and/or docket adequate corporate

-2-04-06-09 Notice ofAlleged PervertedDiscrepancy Notices. Where are the Paper?Zemik v Connor et at 2:2008cv01550


3/36


1 disclosure, and also appears to conduct itself in violation of its own') {\ ~ 1 ( 'I , D : " " ' ~ ~ G e < k - e f - E t h i G : c s s - 2 ~ . ---------------l--

- - -3 Kenneth Lewis, President, Chair, CEO, BAC - No way to tell who represents BAC, if4 any at all. BAC has failed to file and/or docket adequate corporate5 disclosure.6 Att John Patton - For David Pasternak. However, David Pasternak insists on7 simultaneously being listed in pro se.38 Att David Pasternak - For himself. He claims to be simultaneously represented9 d 4an mpro se. f0 Att MichaelWachtell- ForMara Escrow. A subsidiary ofOld Republic Title

11 Insurance Corp, but failing to disclose that fact and/or have it adequately12 docketed5.13 Judge Virginia Phillips - By email and by USPS - since Plaintiff is denied his First14 Amendment Right to file papers in court, and therefore access to the15 courts.16 Magistrate CarlaWoehrle - By email and by UPSP - since Plaintiff is denied his17 First Amendment Right to file papers in court, and therefore, access to18 the courts.19 The Pro Se Clerk - For the record - 4 copies of this filing will be presented today to20 the pro se clerk, in a repeat attempt to exercise my First Amendment21 rights.222324 1Docket ofZernik v Connor et aI, as it appeared on April 5, 2009, will be separately filed.25 2 List ofParties and Counsel, as it appeared on April 5,2009, will be separately filed.26 3 List of Parent Corporations, as it appeared on April 5,2009, will be separately filed.27 4 See note 2 above.28 5 See note 3 above.

-3-04-06-09 Notice ofAlleged PervertedDiscrepancy Notices. Where are the Paper?Zemik v Connor et al 2:200Bcv01550


4/36


1 The court denied my request for electronic filing (Docket #42 in Zernik v

3 burdened with substantial costs and waste of time that no other party was burdened4 by. Furthermore, as it turned out, the Pro Se clerk was used to dishonestly deny me5 the right to file papers with the courts in alleged abuse ofmy First Amendment rights.6 As the pro se clerk himselfexplained - such conduct was all per instructions by7 magistrate Carla Woehrle.8 The requirement to appear before he pro se clerk has made any attempt to file9 papers with this court both futile and abusive. And of course - no other party was

10 subjected to such abuse.11 Magistrate Carla Woehrle, in denying the request to file electronically, claimed12 that the rules ofCourt prohibit her from doing so. That is not the case for example, in13 US District Court in Washington DC, and such rule must be deemed unconstitutional14 upon review, if at all adopted in compliance with the Rule Making EnablingAct, 2815 USC 2071-7.16 III

17 CC: This notice is also copied to:18 a) Audit Committee ofBank ofAmerica Corporation - As an Addendum to19 complaint pursuant to Sarbanes and Oxley Act (2002)20 b) Various Congressional Committees - In re: Courts, Sub-Prime and Bailout21 scandals22 c) SEC- As an Addendum to Complaint against BACICFC23 d) NGOs- For review.24 III25 III26 III27 III28 III

-4-04-06-09 Notice ofAlleged PervertedDiscrepancy Notices. Where are the Paper?Zemik v Connor et al 2:2008cv01550


5/36


2....- --- 3

456789

10111213141516171819202122232425262728

"inartful pleading" (Erickson v Pardus, 2007). In particular, I am not qualified inassessing the validity of legal theories. I ask the court to ignore any irrelevant orerroneous legal theory I claim, and do take into consideration the facts and the claimsthemselves, and if they can support some other valid theory, assign such legal theoryto them, and review them pursuant to such valid legal theory (Haddoc, 1985).

Given the track record of this court, it is necessary to also request another kindof special lenience: That this court stop dishonest conduct against plaintiff, by a judge,by a magistrate, bypro se clerk, and by counsel and parties. Some counsel I haveconsulted in the past claimed that such conduct was only taking place because I wasappearing inpro se. I therefore ask for special lenience as pro se litigant, not to besubjected to such dishonest conduct.

Given the track record of this court, it is particularly necessary to repeat aprevious request to stop dishonest manipulation of docketing (E.g.Docket #60 inZernik v Connor et aT), amounting to abuse ofmy First Amendment rights, and denialofmy right to Access to the Courts and to Equal Protection. Please docket this paperunder the appropriate tag. Please docket it in full. It is also provided as an PDF fileboth by email and on a disc. Therefore, there is no excuse of shortage of staffrequired for scanning.. .Submitted April 6, 2009, La Verne, California,

~ . J o s e p h ZemikPlaintiff in pro per

III2) VERIFIED REQUEST FOR INCORPORATION BYREFERENCE OF ALLPAPERS PREVIOUSLY FILED BY PLAINTIFF AND LISTED IN THEDOCKET REPORT.

-5- 04-06-09 Notice ofAlleged PervertedDiscrepancy Notices. Where are the Paper?Zemik v Connor et at 2:2008cv01550


6/36


234

Submitted, April 6, 2009, La Verne, California,

Joseph ZernikPlaintiff in proper

Joseph ZernikPlaintiff in proper

, / ~ ' l\'",':--


7/36


STATEMENT OF VERIFICATION OF REQUESTS AND NOTICE OFALLEGED PERVERTEDDISCREPANCY NOTICES

Plaintiff in pro per

3 Attached to instant paper:4 Attachment 1) Exhibit 1) Partial compilation of discrepancy notices.5 Attachment 2) Proposed Order6789 I, Joseph Zemik, have read the foregoing Requests andNotice of

10 AllegedPervertedDiscrepancy Notices and I know the content thereof to be true it is11 correct based on my own personal knowledge, except as to those matters therein12 stated as based upon information and belief, and as to to those matters, I believe them13 to be true and correct as well. The Exhibit includes true and correct copies of14 original records n my possession.15 I make this declaration that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of16 perjury pursuant to the laws ofCalifornia and the United States.17 Executed here in La Verne, County ofLos Angeles, on this 6

thday in April,18 2009.

19202122232425262728

-7-04-06-09 Notice ofAlleged PervertedDiscrepancy Notices. Where are the Paper?Zemik v Connor et al 2:2008cv01550


8/36


) . .Q1g . ..~ r r : . ~ ~ i ~

~ 1 1 I . j z l ~ .. ~ i 1 h I n k r i e t . - , : .::;'".c ~ O S . " ,'._ .. .Dilte:2009.04.


9/36


JUDGE: CARLA WOEHRLE

DOCKET 08-CV-OISSO-VAP-CWHON CARLA WOEHRLE, JUDGEHON VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JUDGEPlaintiff

J.I. I 4 2008

TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE!PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED EX PARTEREQUEST FOR ANAFFIRMATIVEACTION ORDER TO COMPELDEFENDANT LA SUPERIORCOURT TO IMMEDIATELYPROVIDE PLAINTIFF ACCESS TO~ - . . , . . . - - - . . . INSPECT AND TO COPY THE.BOOKOF JUDGMENTS (OREQUIVALENT) AND OTHERBOOKS OF COURT, AS'MANDATED BY LAW

". PROPOSED ORDER FILED AS ANClE. ,U.S. DISmlCT 1 . ATTACHMENT

.OENTBA).. O I S T R I C T . o F C ~ - 1 F O R N I ' DATE' JULY 9 2008WESTERNo",tSION .,~ " : t ) E : . l " t J T ! . DEPT: 640

v:JACQUELINE CONNOR ET ALDefendants

JOSEPH ZERNIK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Joseph Zemik2415 Saint George St.Los Angeles, CA 90027Tel: (310) 435 9107Fax: (801) 9980917

Plaintiffin pro per

2345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728

PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FORORDER ljO COMPEL ACCESSTO BOOKS OF COURT-1-

DICREPANC NOTICESRECEIVED BUT NOT FILEDPAGE 2


10/36


--1-4-'- ' --------- i,j)(.nlll.c,.u5Date: 2008.07.1415:05:38 '07'00 '

Digitally signed byJo,eph ZemlkD N : c n ~ J o 5 . p h Z.rnik,1=' 1 34 al1hl

in pro per

3

JOSEPH ZERNIK2 2415 Saint George St.Los Angeles, CA 90027Tel: (310) 4359107Fax: (801) 998 [email protected]

UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURTCENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA1011 JOSEPH ZERNIK12 Plaintiff

DOCKET: CV-08-01550-VAP-CWHONCARLAWOEHRLE, JUDGE13 V.14 JACQUELINE CONNOR ET AL REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE:15 D i f ~ @ n ~16171819202122232425262728

".L.C L ~ K , U.S .. OISTRICTc;OURl_-OENTftAl 0_'STRICT OF C ~ U F O R N I "WeSTERN DMSiON- _ -_ _ \,.if:I"lJT"f'

RECORDS FILED IN LA SUPERIORCOURT:A. MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICAnONSIN RE: LA SUPERIOR COURTRACKETEERING AND FRAUD INSAMAAN V ZERNIK (SC087400)B. URGENT REQUEST FORCONGRESSIONAL ASSISTANCEBY JOSEPH ZERNIK.

OUR GOAL IS TO OPEN THEJUDGMENT BOOKS OF LASUPERIOR COURT.. .BRING LOS ANGELES BACKINTOTHE FOLD OF THE U.S.CONSTITUTION,..

DEPT: 640JUDGE: CARLAWOEHRLEREQ JUDICIAL NOTICE - A. MISCPUBLICATIONS, B. URGENT REQUESTCONGRESS

DICREPANCY OTICESRECEIVED BUT NOT FILEDPAGE 3


11/36


5

3

6

It---------- ------JOSEPH ZERNIK2 2415 Saint George St.Los Angeles, CA 90027Tel: (310) 4359107Fax: (801) 998 09174 jzI2345@earthlink .ne tPLAINTIFFin pro per

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

78910I I JOSEPH ZERNIK12 Plaintiff13 V.14 JACQUELINE CONNOR15 ETAL16 Defendants1718192021

23242526A&; EF!.K, U.S. DfSlFtlCrCQUR1'.(it:: AAL DISTRICT OF CAUFOAN1'WESTERN DMSION~ ' 2 8 ...---- .._. ._ ..__ ~ l ) : : . = E : l - " u J ! .

DOCKET: CV-08-01550-VAP-CWHON CARLA WOEHRLE, .JUDGEPLAINTIFF'S ANALYSIS OF LASC RECORDS:1. WHYTHERE ARE HARDLY ANYVALID LITIGATION RECORDS IN

SAMAAN V Z E R N I ~2. WHY EXISTING LITIGATIONRECORDSARE CONCEALEDBY THELASCt3. HOW SUCH RECORDS IMPLICATESOME TACIT COLLUSIONBY COURT

OF APPEAL, 2nd DISTfUCT, AND4.WHY SUCH RECORDS HAVESUFFICIENT ALLEGED PREDICATEDACTS PER RICO INTHEMTO SUPPORPETITIONER'S CLAIMS SEVERALTIMES OVER.

FILED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'SOPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISSFIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND NEWCLAIMS PER 1962, 1331 & 1332.DATE: NONE ON FILE

-i-PLAINTIFF'S DECLARATION ON TRIAL COURT RECORDS



12/36


or fictitiously named parties

1 e ~ . a t e t ~ doctu't\ent W3Sstani'l)edcqritptywith theLocal R.ules may

,to:bexUed;but iil!ne:ad J ~ : m I ; ) ; i \ t 1 d m : ( } 1 I D E R E : D r e t u ~ ~ : ' ' ' C Q u n $ e L ' C o ~ m r e l '1hs;1l. an iadiesprevio'$sly;$etl' with the ~ t & c h ' e d documentS th3;t said .oollumtJJiiskavc not


13/36


UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURTCENTRALDISTRICTOF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH ZERNIK . P la in tif fDOCKET 08-CV-01550-VAP-CWHON CARLAWOEHRLE, JUDGEHON VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JUDGETIME IS OF THE ESSENCE!PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED EX PARTEREQUESTa. THAT THIS COURT STOPDISHONEST FILING ANDDOCKETING MANIPULATIONSOF PRO SE LITIGANT PAPERS,b, THAT EX PARTE APPLICATIONRECEIVED BY THE CLERK ONJULY 14,2008 FOR AN ORDER TOCOMPEL LA SUPERIOR COURTTO IMMEDIATELY PROVIDEPLAINTIFF ACCESS TO INSPECTAND TO COpy THE BOOK OFJUDGMENT BE DOCKETED ASENTERED BY 5:00PM TODAY,JULY 16, 2008DEPT: 640JUDGE: CARLA WOEHRLE

Digitally signedby Joseph Zernik

ClERK, U.8, DlSTmCTCOURT DN: cn=JosephBYCEN1l'W.DlSlRIcrOFCA1.lFORNIA . ~ : : ; : I : j Z I 2 3 4 5 @ eDEPl.JT'( i ..arthilrlk;.:netr c ~ U 5Date: 2008.07.1605:31:05 -07'00'

NOTICE:1) Copies of this paper weresimultaneously faxed to members of thehouse and senate judiciary committees,as follow up to previous request forurgent congressional assistance.2) Phone message alerting the court tothe filing of July 14,2008 and July 16,2008 ex parte applications were leftwith Judge Woehrle's Clerk, Ms DonnaThomas (213-894-6825), with JudgePhillips' Clerk, Ms Marva Villard (9513284461) and with Docketing QualityAssurance, Ms Celia Anglom Reed (213894 2246). ~ S : O O a m , July 16,2008.

V.JACQUELINE CONNOR ET ALDefendants

Joseph Zemik2415 Saint George St.Los Angeles, CA 90027Tel: (310) 4359107Fax: (801) 998 0917Plaintiffin pro per

23456789

10111213141516171819202122232425262728

PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FORORDER TJO COMPELACCESS TO BOOKS OF COURT


-1-


14/36


i ': ..

~ , ,~

!:::J } ; r < - ; ~ ; ; P l t .

., -!

.'". 9 O'.J Ii 10 !L _ - . - ~ -.-l

11

.

UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURTCENTRAL DISTRICTOF CALIFORNIA

. o i : l I l : n _ ~ -+- .

No. CV-08-01550-VAP-CWHON V. A. PHILLIPS, JUDGEHON C. WOEHRLE, JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE COURT OFDEFENDANT THE HONORABLE TERRYFRffiDMAN, JUDGE,AND PARnES IN

SAMAAN VZERNIK (SC087400)TO CEASE AND DESISTRACKETEERING

FILED INU.S. DISTRICT COURT INSUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S

1. OPPOSlnON TO MOTIONS TODISMISS, AND2. REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION

0.1


21/36


Digitally signedby Joseph ZernikDN: cn=Joseph~ .

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICTOF CALIFORNIA

~ J O " ' . ~ ~ E " ' P " " ' H " ' " " ' ' - I i " D " " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' N I < ' ' ' ' - - - - - - - 224, ! Saint George St.

. . --_--- , L


22/36


Digitally ~ g n c dby Joseph ZemikON:cn"'Jostph

") . ' 7 - ~ ~ ~ ; i l l ~ j Z l ; Z 3 ~ S f i ! l- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - ~ ~ ~ - - - -O l l t ~ 1008.0/.2"

1 ~ : 2 1 : 3 1 ~ 7 ' O O ''i/lc,,)f, ''l;'&JUL 28 AN /0: 43JOSEPH ZERNIK2 2415 Saint George St.

Los Angeles, CA 900273 Tel: (310) 43591074 Fax:(801)9980917

jz [email protected] PLAINTIFF6 in proper


13 V.14 JACQUELINE CONNOR ETALDefendants

789

1011 JOSEPH ZERNIK12

1516171819202122232425262728

PlaintiffDOCKET: CV-08-01550-VAP-CWHON CARLA WOEHRLE, JUDGEHON VIRGINIA A PHILLIPS, JUDGE

REQUEST FOR THE HONORABLE JUDGEVIRGINIA A PHILLIPS TO FILE ASTATEMENT ON THE RECORD PURSUANTTO CCJECANON 3(E)(2)

DATE: JULY 24, 2008TIME:DEPT:JUDGE:

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE- CA CTOF APPEALREQ FOR STATEMENTS ON THE RECORD

DICREPANC' NOTICESRECEIVED BUT NOT FILEDPAGE 15


23/36


20ue JUI ?Q III091..,..... .0loyJoul;IoZ"'''ON'n. . . . .ph

) . ~ = J l I l l U " ' "."iaft!l:nd.la\DD.al:r.xm.0714

, ~ : ... I :'

t: ';I

- - - - : - * = - = - - : - = c : : - = = - = ~ _ = c = = _ = _ _ - - - - - - ~ ~ . . . _inN - 4 - ~ - - - - - - ~ 1 - - - -1 JOSEPH ZERNIK2 2415 SaintGeorge St.Los Angeles, CA 900273 Tel:(310)4359107Fax: (801) 998 09174 [email protected] PLAINTIFF6 in proper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICTOF CALIFORNIA

13 ~ 14 JACQUELINE CONNOR ET AL15 Defendants16171819202122232425

262728

789

1011 JOSEPH ZERNIK12 Plaintiff

DOCKET: CV-08-01550-VAP-CWHON CARLAWOEHRLE, JUDGEHON VIRGINIA A PHILLIPS, JUDGE

PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE REQUESTSFOR RECONSIDERATION OF HONJUDGE PHILLIPS' MARCH 21, 2008RULINGS AND ORDERS DENYINGPLAINTIFF'S TRO AND OSC AGAINSTJUDGE FRIEDMAN, AND REQUEST TOINSTATE SUCH TRO AND OSC IN CASETHE HON JUDGE PHILLIPS RULES TOREVERSE HERMARCH 21, 2008RULINGS OR ORDERS.SUCH TRO AND OSC ARE AS NEEDEDTODAY AS THEYWERE THEN

DEPT:JUDGE:

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATIONOF MARCH 21,2008MINUTE ORDER

DICREPANC' NOTICESRECEIVED BUT NOT FILEDPAGE 16


24/36


UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURTCENTRALDISTRICTOF CAJLIFORNIA

NOTICE OF DOCIIMENTDISCREPANCIES;,

, DeputyClerk I' ,_ "..-Date ~ e c e i v e d : ...._ " " ' ~ _ . . : ; . / _ ...;._

Upon the submission of the attached document(s), it was noted that the following discrepancies exist:o Local Rule 11-3.! Document not legible Q) ~ \1/ I o Local Rule 11-3.S Lacking tillXne, address, phonlt and facsimi\2 numbers I' I J .1.11-o Local Rule 11-4.1 No copy provided for judge ') - J v-(}->o Local Rule 19-1 ComplaintIPetition includes more than ten (10) Does or fictitiously named partieso Local Rule 15-1 Proposed ameno/ed ple.adi"g n o under separate cover I.. J. A Lo Local Rule 11-6 Memnrandum/onef exce


25/36


~ ~ ~

):&fti:r;) It{tloe l'lte file; iWcumenl waf /t'aIrtpedffiittht>rfari'tJlIcfla c ~ m p l y w'tih'(fie J L ' t 1 l ! d l l J ~ d e s may

. . , /

The"rclead ' t O p e u a l t W ; l l ~ u : a n t ~ o L Q c a l R ~

To: 0 u . $ . l 1 i s t n c t J p ~ e ' l l i f O : s . M a g i ~ t m t e j u d a eFrom:;' !(,: , ~ : ; . ! .

DateO The documentis.N6TtGbet'Ued,bu

i m m e d l l l t e ( Y ) l ~ f f , iliwnt3ng,aU .beenfiIedwitbtheCourt;ettu;rneutbi COliJi$'d. '


26/36



Dogk.1ly,Iql'\'dby)OSfphZVm:k

) . : . : ~ : ~ : : ' ; ; : :.....n''' ' '-U\O.lf:10Q8.07.111\l9:OI:ll01'OO'

Joseph Zemik2 24)5 Saint George St.L o Angeles, CA 90027

3", 1 ~ 1 : ( 3 1 0 ) 4 3 5 9 1 0 7/ , c - , \--ISil[ FM: (801) 998 0917'--I . {~ = \ j:3:" . [email protected], :;:! \ < _ to..intiff

, \,_ \ >- em ~ r per~ liJN' ffi I\w '}, - ='$ oJ!;':: \55\ \,....9 "0 1. .,

No. CV-08-01550-VAP-CWHON V. A. PIllLLIPS, JUDGEHON C. WOEHRLE, JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE COURT OFDEFENDANT THE HONORABLE TERRYFRIEDMAN, JUDGE, AND PARTIES INSAMAAN VZERNIK (SC087400)

TO CEASE AND DESISTRACKETEERING

FILED IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT INSUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S

1. OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TODISMISS, AND2. REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION

OF:a) REQUEST FOR TRO ANDIOROSC DENIED 3/21108b) REQUEST TO COMPEL LASe

TO ALLOW ACCESS TOBOOKS OF COURT,PARTICULARLY - BOOK OF

JUDGMENT

I I1213141516171819202122232425262728

JOSEPH ZERNIKPlaintiff

JI:JACQUELINE CONNORET ALDefendants

-1-DATE: JULY 28, 2008

NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST RACKETEERING



27/36


Digita lly sig ne dby Joseph Zernik

. DN: o


DOCKET : CV-0 8-0 1550-V AP-CWHON CARLA WOEHRLE, JUDGE

PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE&REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTIC E OF:

CORRESPONDENCE WITH OFFICES OFCLERK AND PRESID ING JUDGE, LASUPERIOR COURT, IN RE:CERTIFICATION OF ENTRY,ALTERNATIVELY CERTIFICATION OFNON-ENTRY OF AUG 9,2 007JUDGMENT BY COURT PURSUANT TOCCP437c

I 1 JOSEPH ZERN IKI 2 2 J Sain t G eo rge St.i LcRilAngeles, CA 90027i 4359107!0 :=: (801) 998 0917\s;; w... . \ e k IUJ 2 ; J N F I f:;:3 Z ,. perIc.c as i 1l.-J iI."" 8 ~ I .' 9 iL .. - .. -!-_..}.

1011 JOSEPH ZERNIK12J3 P la in tif f14 V.15 JACQUELINE CONNORETAL1617 Defendants1819202122232425262728

DATE:

//.- ';,,, . , '=J< o ~ .arth lin k. net , c=USDate: 2008.0 7.2413:26:24 -07'00'

JULY 24, 2008

NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF LEITERS TO AND FROMOFFICE OF PRESIDING JU DGE, LASC

DICREPANC1 NOTICESRECEIVED BUT NOT FILEDPAGE 20


28/36


~ ~ t l n s ORPllRBD to be the l;l.atethe document wass tampedsQC thaltalty further failure tQ


29/36


Dlgitolllysigned: by J o ~ p h lemik

DN:(II=JosephZernik.c.rnail-jzI23"SO


JOSEPH ZERNIK2 2415 Saint George St.Los Angeles, CA 900273 Tel: (310) 435 9107Fax: (801) 99809174 [email protected] PLAINTIFF6 in proper789

,=Dale: :lOOs.uJ.J'}''':02:03-07'00'

28

DOCKET: CV-08-01550-VAP-CWHON VIRGINIAA PHILLIPSNOTICE OF JULY 29, 2008DECLARAnON OF PLAINTIFF JOSEPHZERNIK:ABUSE OF FIRST AMENDMENT ANDDUE PROCESS RIGHTS AT THE U.S.DISTRICT COURT, LOS ANGELES.FILED IN SUPPORT OF:1) PI"AINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TOMOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT2) PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FORRECONSIDERATION OF U.S. DISTRICTCOURT JUDGE PHILLIPS'MARCH 21,2008 MINUTE ORDER DENYINGPLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR TRO/OSCAGAINST DEFENDANT FRIEDMAN,JUDGE OF LASCDEPT:JUDGE: VIRGINIA PHILLIPSDATE: JULY 29, 2008COPIED CONCURRENTLY SUBMITTEDTO MEMBERS OF U.S. HOUSE ANDSENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEES.

Plaintiff

--..........._ .......-_...... -_ ...........- 1AE!eE l V ,E01BtlTNOT FlLEO IJll. 29 2000 ,

12

14

10 JOSEPH ZERNIK11

13 JACQUELINE CONNOR ET ALDefendants1516171819202122232425 I" CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COlJHT26 . CENTRAL DISTRICT OF 9ALlFORNI1'WESTERN DIVISION27 &r. ue:I"UTv~ .. ' -

NOTICE OF ZERNIK'S DECLARATION IN RE: ABUSE AT USDCLA



30/36


DislUfi.si9. ..;byJos,ph Z ~ 1 " ~ ' v :ON: cna).:


31/36


"'tt ' f

- _ . _ - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - -

p

IT IS IiER:EBY ORDERED:tobe:the datet"jle document wassfarru>td:ku:e ~ e o m p l y w h b t h e L d c a l ' R t e s > m ~ y

O R D ~ D retume(jto " ' c ~ u i ' l s e t *Counsel shall .:.ned dO(lumemsthalsaiddOcume111s have Dot


32/36


, ~ t t " : - ; ; " " ~ " " " " ' f o : " " ' ~ ' ' ' e ' ,..,.............,......;._.-

: S > N ~ ~ ~ t i , j ~ ' g ~ ,

~ ' , t e f t l i m ~ ' i 6 ' l i c 0 1 . 1 n s e l , C ( ) a l ' / ! ) e l ' s h a l l , . ' : ~ < . ' '.:,:, : _: :_::::'?::, - ':', .' - :; ",.c,;",.,: ~ . .,. _' .. '-::,.:::. ~ t i M c ~ f . S ~ t ' $ a r t t d ( ) U l i 1 e n t s ' J . i a \ l t : i l o t ,

, ' ~ t o b ' I t U l e 4 a t e J ~ e < d ( ) e \ l m e n t w < J $ s t a r n p e d ~ ~ e r f a i l " t e ' l o . : < i O m p ] y : w i l l i ' t h e , L ' ( ; l d l R ~ I ~ $ a y '

' N 0 1 , ' ~ P : ~ $ . O ~ t ~ ~ ~ ' ! ~ f J l . . ~ ! ~ $ l ~ . i S ; '_---'- - , - , + ~ _ _ . : . , _ ~ ~ F - c - - - ~ ~ ' - - - - ' . . : ; . . : , . , ' , . , - "",,' ~ ~ h " ' - ~ - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - ~ - - -


33/36


. - . . . . . . - _ - - - - - - - ~ - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - -

Oigil311y ~ g n e d byJoseph Zernil


34/36


UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURTCENTRAL DISTRICTOF CALIFORNIA

I '11 " , I 4 :KNIK2 21J5 Saint George St.r - '1 ~ ~ . , ; L ~ ~ . Angeles, CA 9002763 s i ~ ret: (310) 4359107= ';. , ~ (801) 9980917

I t ; . , ~ ~ ' [email protected]:) N 55PLAINTIFF~ ~ p { ~ p r o p e r~ L J B , . 8 ".

9

14 JACQUELINE CONNOR ET AL

10

11 JOSEPH ZERNIK1213 v.

. Plaintiff DOCKET:CY08-01550-YAPCWHON CARIJAWOEHRLE,JUDGE

JULY 22, 2008

PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OFCOMPLAINTS FILEDWITH FBIWHITE COLLAR CRIME SQUADRONAGAINST JUDGE CARLA WOEHRLEAND CLERKDONNA THOMASRE:OBSTRUCTION IN DOCKETING

DATE:

Defendants

p&/)1Jc-:IVD }A;ltVV/fC ~ b : ? : J ! J ' L

1\1'111 IV tf V V ~ Or On t 4 ; 1 ' ~

1516171819202122232425262728 NOTICE OF COMPLAINTS FILED WITH FBI AGAINST JUDGE WOEHRLEAND CLERK \THOMAS RE: OBSTRUCTION IN DOCKETING.

DICREPANCl NOTICESRECEIVED BUT NOT FILEDPAGE 27


35/36


NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S)


ZERNIK

CONNORETALv,

PLAINTIFF(S).

DEFENDANT(S),

CASE NUMBER2:2008cv01550

PROOF OF SERVICE -ACKNOWLEDGMENTOF SERVICE

at La Verne

I, the undersigned. certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years. employed in the County ofLos Angeles, State of California. and not aparty to the above-entitled cause. On April 6, 20 09 . I served a true copy ofRequests and notice of discrepancy noticesby personally delivering it to the person (s) indicated below in the manner as provided in FRCivP 5(b); bydepositing it in the United States Mail in a sealed envelope with the postage thereon fully prepaid to the following:(list names and addresses for person(s) served, Attach additional pages if necessary.)

Place ofMailing: _L_a_V_e_rn_e:....,C_A _Executed on ..;..A""p.:.:ril:..;6'-- 20 09Please check one of these boxes if service is made by mail:o I hereby certify that I am a member of the Bar of the United States District Court. Central District ofCalifornia.o I hereby certify that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court at whose direction theservice was made.

I hereby certify under the penalty of perjury that the foregoin is true and correct.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICEI, , received a true copy of the within document on _

Signature

CV -40 (01/00)

Party SeIYed

PROOFOF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE


36/36


SERVICE LIST FOR ZERNIK V CONNOR ET AL (revised 4/7/09)Sarah L OVerton and Kathryn DICarloCummings McClorey Davis Acho and Associates3801 University AvenueSuite 700Riverside, CA 92501951-276-4420Email: [email protected]@cmda-law.comJohnW Patton, Jr and David PasternakPasternak Pasternak & Patton1875 Century Park ESuite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067-2523310-553-1500Email: [email protected]@paslaw.com

Michael L WachtellBuchalterNemer PC1000Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017-2457213-891-5761Email: [email protected] Amberg and Jenna MoldawskyBryan Cave, LLP120 Broadway, Suite 300Santa Monica, CA 90401-2386Tel (3101 576-2100Fax (3101 576-2200Email: [email protected]@bryancave.com

2009-04-09 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of...

Documents

Transcript of 2009-04-09 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of...