2006/2007 Class 5

Introduction

SANTOS,Raimundo - Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Campinas, v. 1, n. 1, p. 22-38, jul./dez. 2003 – ISSN: 1678-765X

increases

interest for scientific production quantitative indicators helps

• Scientifical and technological dynamics understanding;

• Political engeneering;

• Decision making on this area.

Quantitative scientific production measured by

number of articles published

in scientifical journals

Scientific production has been increasing in the last years:

Graph - Annual evolution of the portuguese scientific publications´ number on Science Citation Index (totals and with foreign’s co-authorship). Source: ISI – Web of Knowledge

Scientific production has been increasing in the last years:

Graph - Annual evolution of the portuguese scientific publications´ number on Science Citation Index (totals and with foreign’s co-authorship). Source: ISI – Web of Knowledge

COIMBRA JR., Carlos E. A. Scientific production in public health and the international literature bases. Cad. Saúde Pública. 1999, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 883-888. http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/

Indexed journals

• report investigation results

• look up for bibliographic information

ISI web of Science

ALLOW TO

• title

• author

• magazine´s impact factor

•Citation data

ALLOWS ACCESS TO

EVALUATING JOURNALS

Many factors are taken into account:

Qualitative Quantitative

journal's basic publishing standards

• editorial content

• authorship’s internacional

diversity• citation data

Interrelated

All factors determine strengths and weaknesses of the journal

J. M. CAMPANARIO, L. GONZÁLEZ: Journal self-citations -Scientometrics 69 (2006)

IMPACT FACTOR

bibliometric product

more

used

Internacional scope and diffusing of

academic journalsfundamental indicator

became widespread

Its use

Aims

Research Selection

Develop an objective methodology

for scientifical

articles

In order to make it:

REPRODUCTIBLE

-Author’s position;

-Number;

-Citation´s Number;

-Impact factor;

-Journals.

LISBON

COIMBRA

compare

Methods Two medical schools

http://scientific.thomson.com/pt/produtos/WoK/wok/

FMUC FMUL

Reasons: the oldest universities and the ones

which have simultaneously hospital and faculty.

Data base:

ISI web of knowledge

• gives access to the leader of database of quote (Web of Science);

• gathers the searched results promoting its analysis (Analyze tool);

• has available index records, virtual documents and electronic journals.

Begin

Choose the medical school

Coimbra? no

2710 publications

Is a Fac Med Lisbon’s publication?

n publications

n publications

yes no

yes

805 publications

Is a Fac Med Coimbra’s publication?

noyes

708 publications

97 publications

Publications’ inclusion

Publications’ exclusion

Choose the publication

year

Collect publication information

SPSS data inclusion

Data statistic treatment

End

Lisboa?

2005?yes

no

yes

no

Choose the database

Choose the queries

Article prodution

Web site prodution

• Flowchart

http://scientific.thomson.com/pt/produtos/WoK/wok/

Inicial queriesLisbon* medical school Lisboa* medical school

Lisbon* school of medicine Faculty of medicine of Lisboa*

Faculty medicine Lisboa*Faculdade de medicina de

Lisboa*

Medical school, Lisbon*Medical school, Lisboa*

Faculty of medicine, Lisboa* School of medicine, Lisboa*

* - Coimbra

FINAL QUERY : Lisboa* or Lisbon* 2005

• Exclusion criterias:

- Articles not published in faculties:

- Articles with none contribution of faculty members;

• Inclusion criterias:

- Articles with contribution of faculty members;

- Articles from:

Lisbon Coimbra

Santa Maria’s HospitalUniv Coimbra Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol

Coimbra

Lisbon fac. Med. Dermatol Clin Coimbra, Portugal

Hosp Univ Coimbra

Univ Coimbra, Fac Med

Univ Hosp Coimbra

Fac Med, Coimbra

- Journal Citation´s number specific for the article; Publication review or journal; Page; Volume; Impact factor.

• Information from the articles:

- Author author; Other authors; institution´s 1st author; Author’s position; 1st author’s filiation 1 and 2; institution´s 1st author : filiation; Author’s total number.

Data Base creation

Statistical Analysis

Lables

Graphs

SPSS

-Statistical calculations;

- Results interpretation and presentation

• Data base creation

Results

Graph 1 – 1st Author’s Institution Filiation

• Coimbra

Graph 2 – 1st Author’s first filiation

Graph 3 – 1st Author’s second filiation

Statistics

Impactfactor91

6

3.01662

2.47100

2.182385

.466

11.632

274.512

1.57700

4.04800

Valid

Missing

N

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

Minimum

Maximum

Sum

25

75

Percentiles

Impactfactor

1 1,0 1,1 1,1

1 1,0 1,1 2,2

2 2,1 2,2 4,4

1 1,0 1,1 5,5

1 1,0 1,1 6,6

7 7,2 7,7 14,3

1 1,0 1,1 15,4

1 1,0 1,1 16,5

1 1,0 1,1 17,6

2 2,1 2,2 19,8

1 1,0 1,1 20,9

1 1,0 1,1 22,0

3 3,1 3,3 25,3

1 1,0 1,1 26,4

1 1,0 1,1 27,5

1 1,0 1,1 28,6

1 1,0 1,1 29,7

1 1,0 1,1 30,8

1 1,0 1,1 31,9

1 1,0 1,1 33,0

3 3,1 3,3 36,3

1 1,0 1,1 37,4

1 1,0 1,1 38,5

1 1,0 1,1 39,6

1 1,0 1,1 40,7

1 1,0 1,1 41,8

1 1,0 1,1 42,9

1 1,0 1,1 44,0

2 2,1 2,2 46,2

1 1,0 1,1 47,3

1 1,0 1,1 48,4

1 1,0 1,1 49,5

1 1,0 1,1 50,5

1 1,0 1,1 51,6

3 3,1 3,3 54,9

1 1,0 1,1 56,0

1 1,0 1,1 57,1

2 2,1 2,2 59,3

3 3,1 3,3 62,6

1 1,0 1,1 63,7

1 1,0 1,1 64,8

1 1,0 1,1 65,9

2 2,1 2,2 68,1

1 1,0 1,1 69,2

1 1,0 1,1 70,3

1 1,0 1,1 71,4

1 1,0 1,1 72,5

1 1,0 1,1 73,6

1 1,0 1,1 74,7

2 2,1 2,2 76,9

1 1,0 1,1 78,0

5 5,2 5,5 83,5

1 1,0 1,1 84,6

2 2,1 2,2 86,8

1 1,0 1,1 87,9

1 1,0 1,1 89,0

1 1,0 1,1 90,1

1 1,0 1,1 91,2

1 1,0 1,1 92,3

3 3,1 3,3 95,6

1 1,0 1,1 96,7

1 1,0 1,1 97,8

1 1,0 1,1 98,9

1 1,0 1,1 100,0

91 93,8 100,0

6 6,2

97 100,0

.466

.490

.591

.634

.646

.799

.821

.942

1.056

1.219

1.401

1.498

1.577

1.610

1.664

1.687

1.764

1.773

1.790

1.797

1.802

1.811

1.823

1.854

1.857

1.888

1.904

1.995

2.192

2.227

2.251

2.296

2.471

2.477

2.527

2.830

2.842

2.945

2.994

3.088

3.227

3.274

3.410

3.508

3.637

3.767

3.786

3.818

3.879

4.048

4.224

4.604

4.904

4.971

5.288

5.505

5.854

6.020

6.956

7.506

7.535

7.577

9.885

11.632

Total

Valid

noneMissing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Table 1 - Impact factor

Table 2 – Impact factor

Graph 4 – Journal impact factor

Statistics

Citationnumber97

0

2,00

6,357

0

36

408

,50

5,00

Valid

Missing

N

Median

Std. Deviation

Minimum

Maximum

Sum

25

75

Percentiles

Citationnumber

24 24,7 24,7 24,7

21 21,6 21,6 46,4

15 15,5 15,5 61,9

3 3,1 3,1 64,9

7 7,2 7,2 72,2

5 5,2 5,2 77,3

3 3,1 3,1 80,4

4 4,1 4,1 84,5

1 1,0 1,0 85,6

2 2,1 2,1 87,6

1 1,0 1,0 88,7

1 1,0 1,0 89,7

1 1,0 1,0 90,7

1 1,0 1,0 91,8

1 1,0 1,0 92,8

3 3,1 3,1 95,9

1 1,0 1,0 96,9

1 1,0 1,0 97,9

1 1,0 1,0 99,0

1 1,0 1,0 100,0

97 100,0 100,0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

15

17

18

19

22

27

36

Total

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Table 3 – Article citation´s number

Table 4 – Article citation´s number

Graph 5 – Article citation´s number

6 2 2 7 4 3 4 1 3 1 1

3 4 2 5

2 3 5 1 3 3 1 1

4 3 1 2 1

1 1 1 1

3 1 3

1 1 1

2 1

1

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 20

Table 5 – Relative position of Institution Author

References

SANTOS,Raimundo - Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Campinas, v. 1, n. 1, p. 22-38, jul./dez. 2003 – ISSN: 1678-765X

COIMBRA JR., Carlos E. A. Scientific production in public health and the international literature bases. Cad. Saúde Pública. 1999, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 883-888.

http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection/

J. M. CAMPANARIO, L. GONZÁLEZ: Journal self-citations -Scientometrics 69 (2006)

http://scientific.thomson.com/pt/produtos/WoK/wok/