2008 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2008
2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006
-
Upload
amela-hernandez -
Category
Documents
-
view
35 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006
![Page 1: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary
Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006
2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary
Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006
Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
L’Institut canadien desactuaires
L’Institut canadien desactuaires
![Page 2: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Regression Models and Loss Reserving
Regression Models and Loss Reserving
Leigh J. Halliwell, FCAS, MAAA
Consulting Actuary
CIA Seminar for the Appointed Actuary
Toronto, Canada
September 21, 2006
Leigh J. Halliwell, FCAS, MAAA
Consulting Actuary
CIA Seminar for the Appointed Actuary
Toronto, Canada
September 21, 2006
![Page 3: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Outline
Linear (or Regression) Models
The Problem of Stochastic Regressors
Reserving Methods as Linear Models
WC Example
Conclusion
![Page 4: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Linear (Regression) Models
“Regression toward the mean” coined by Sir Francis
Galton (1822-1911).
The real problem: Finding the Best Linear Unbiased
Estimator (BLUE) of vector y2, vector y1 observed.
y = X + e. X is the design (regressor) matrix. unknown;
e unobserved, but (the shape of) its variance is known.
For the proof of what follows see Halliwell [1997] 325-336.
![Page 5: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
The Formulation
2212
2111
2212
2111
2
1
2
1
2
1
2221
12112
2221
1211
2
1
12
11
12
1
12
11,
X
X
tttt
tttt
tttt
tttt
t
t
kkt
kt
t
t
Vare
e
e
e
y
y
![Page 6: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Trend Example
3353
35552
2
1
132
15112
132
151
I00I
,
8171615141312111
ee
ee
yy
Var
![Page 7: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The BLUE Solution
1
11
1112
varianceparameter 1
1112121
111212
varianceprocess12
1112122
222
11
111
1
11
111
111
112122
XXˆ
XXˆXX
ˆ
XXXˆ
ˆXˆXˆ
Var
Var
Var yy
y
yy
![Page 8: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Special Case: = It
1
112
222
22
111
11
22
XXˆ
XˆXIˆ
XXXˆ
ˆXˆ
2
Var
VarVar tyy
y
y
![Page 9: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Estimator of the Variance Scale
kt
1
111
11112ˆXˆX
ˆ
yy
![Page 10: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Remarks on the Linear Model
Actuaries need to learn the matrix algebra.
Excel OK; but statistical software is desirable.
X1 of is full column rank, 11 non-singular.
Linearity Theorem:
Model is versatile. My four papers (see References) describe
complicated versions.
22 ˆAA yy
![Page 11: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Problem of Stochastic Regressors
See Judge [1988] 571ff; Pindyck and Rubinfeld [1998] 178ff.
If X is stochastic, the BLUE of may be biased:
e
e
e
e
y
EE
EE
XXX
XXXˆ
XXX
XXXX
XXXˆ
1
1
1
1
1
![Page 12: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Clue: Regression toward the MeanTo intercept or not to intercept?
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
Loss @12
Loss
@24
![Page 13: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
What to do?
Ignore it.
Add an intercept.
Barnett and Zehnwirth [1998] 10-13, notice that the
significance of the slope suffers. The lagged loss may not
be a good predictor.
Intercept should be proportional to exposure.
Explain the torsion. Leads to a better model?
![Page 14: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Galton’s Explanation
Children's heights regress toward the mean. Tall fathers tend to have sons shorter than themselves. Short fathers tend to have sons taller than themselves.
Height = “genetic height” + environmental errorA son inherits his father’s genetic height:
Son’s height = father’s genetic height + error.
A father’s height proxies for his genetic height. A tall father probably is less tall genetically. A short father probably is less short genetically.
Excellent discussion in Bulmer [1979] 218-221.Cf. also sportsci.org/resource/stats under “Regression to Mean.”
![Page 15: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Lesson for Actuaries
Loss is a function of exposure.Losses in the design matrix, i.e., stochastic
regressors (SR), are probably just proxies for exposures. Zero loss proxies zero exposure.
The more a loss varies, the poorer it proxies.The torsion of the regression line is the clue.Reserving actuaries tend to ignore exposures – some
even glad not to have to “bother” with them!SR may not even be significant.Covariance is an alternative to SR [Halliwell 1996].
![Page 16: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Reserving Methods as Linear Models
The loss rectangle: AYi at age j
Often the upper left triangle is known; estimate lower right triangle.
The earlier AYs lead the way for the later AYs.The time of each ij-cell is known – we can
discount paid losses.Incremental or cumulative, no problem. (But
variance structure of incrementals is simpler.)
![Page 17: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The Basic Linear Model
yij incremental loss of ij-cell
aij adjustments (if needed, otherwise = 1)
xi exposure (relativity) of AYi
fj incremental factor for age j (sum constrained)
r pure premium
eij error term of ij-cell
1 j
jijjiijij frfxa ey
![Page 18: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Familiar Reserving Methods
Additive
Bühlmann-Stanard
Ferguson-rBornhuette1
LadderChain quasi
X
ijjiij
ijjiij
ijjiij
ijijij
rfx
rfx
rfx
rxf
ey
ey
ey
ey
eY
BF estimates zero parameters.BF, SB, and Additive constitute a progression.The four other permutations are less interesting.No stochastic regressors
BF estimates zero parameters.BF, SB, and Additive constitute a progression.The four other permutations are less interesting.No stochastic regressors
![Page 19: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The Ultimate Question
Last column of rectangle is ultimate increment.There may be no observation in last column:
Exogenous information for late parameters fj or fj. Forces the actuary to reveal hidden assumptions. See Halliwell [1996b] 10-13 and [1998] 79.
Risky to extrapolate a pattern. It is the hiding, not the making, of assumptions that ruins the actuary’s credibility. Be aware and explicit.
![Page 20: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Linear Transformations
Results: and Interesting quantities are normally linear:
AY totals and grand totals Present values
Powerful theorems (Halliwell [1997] 303f):
The present-value matrix is diagonal in the discount factors.
2y 22 yy Var
AˆAˆAA
ˆAˆA
2222
22
yyyy
yy
VarVar
EE
![Page 21: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Transformed Observations
2221
1211
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
AAAAA
,A
XAXA
ee
ee
yy
Var
If A-1 exists, then the estimation is unaffected. Use the BLUE formulas on slide 7.If A-1 exists, then the estimation is unaffected. Use the BLUE formulas on slide 7.
![Page 22: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Example in Excel
WC Example.lnk
![Page 23: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Conclusion
Typical loss reserving methods: are primitive linear statistical models originated in a bygone deterministic era underutilize the data
Linear statistical models:are BLUEavoid stochastic regressorshave desirable linear properties, especially for present-valuing fully utilize the dataare versatile, of limitless form force the actuary to clarify assumptions
![Page 24: 2006 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2006](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032708/56812e31550346895d93978d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ReferencesBarnett, Glen, and Ben Zehnwirth, “Best Estimates for Reserves,” PCAS
LXXXVII (2000), 245-321.Bulmer, M.G., Principles of Statistics, Dover, 1979.Halliwell, Leigh J., “Loss Prediction by Generalized Least Squares,
PCAS LXXXIII (1996), 436-489.“ , “Statistical and Financial Aspects of Self-Insurance Funding,” Alternative Markets / Self Insurance, 1996, 1-46.“ , “Conjoint Prediction of Paid and Incurred Losses,” Summer 1997 Forum, 241-379.“ , “Statistical Models and Credibility,” Winter 1998 Forum, 61-152.
Judge, George G., et al., Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Second Edition, Wiley, 1988.
Pindyck, Robert S., and Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, Fourth Edition, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Venter, Gary G., “Testing the Assumptions of Age-to-Age Factors,” PCAS LXXXV (1998), 807-847.