2005 October 17East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting1 Instrumental effects in geodetic VLBI Brian Corey...
-
Upload
chrystal-elliott -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of 2005 October 17East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting1 Instrumental effects in geodetic VLBI Brian Corey...
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
1
Instrumental effects in geodetic VLBI
Brian Corey
(with copious cribbing from Alan Rogers’s 1991 Chapman Conference paper on “Instrumentation Improvements to Achieve Millimeter Accuracy”)
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
2
Topics
Antenna reflections and focus effects Feed cross-polarization Spurious signals Baseband filters Cable cal Correlation/fringe-fitting errors Correlation/fringe-fitting repeatability Challenges to fringe-fitting algorithms
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
3
Antenna effects
Unstable antenna structure (Ft. Davis effect) Multiple reflections within antenna structure
Typical effect on MBD: 1-10 ps bias <1 ps variable with pointing and focus changes
Multiple reflections within feed For 10% voltage reflection, effect on MBD
measured over 720 MHz: <22 ps bias <1 ps variable with pointing and focus changes
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
4
Antenna effects (cont’d)
Dispersion in a defocused paraboloid For 1-cm change in feed
position, group-phase delay dispersion = ~4 ps, independent of BW.
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
5
Feed cross-polarization
Cross-polarization on unpolarized source MBD effect depends on product of LCP responses
and parallactic angle difference between antennas -15 to -20 dB typical xpol for non-VLBA antennas For -15 dB xpol, MBD error ~10 ps at X-band
Cross-polarization on linearly polarized source For 10% polarized source and -15 dB xpol feed, X-
band MBD effect ≤ 10 ps, depending on feed and source polarization position angles.
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
6
Feed cross-polarization (cont’d)
Cures: Apply xpol corrections to MBDs
Determine correction terms by Measuring xpol in special dual-pol experiments, or Estimating from geodetic MBD data directly, using
dependence on parallactic angle difference Will not work for polarized sources unless
polarization source maps are available Fix the feeds (like that’s going to
happen…) or build new antenna/feed systems (VLBI2010!).
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
7
Spurious phase calibration signals
Spurious signals interfere coherently with phase cal
-20 dBc spur can shift MBD measured over 720 MHz by 22 ps (worst case)
Causes: Additive signals Intermodulation Images Crosstalk And on and on…
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
8
Spurious phase calibration signals (cont’d)
Typical spur levels in current systems are -40 dBc, but there are exceptions (worse!).
Methods for reducing effects of spurious signals on MBD: Clean up receivers and backends Offset receiver LO from integer MHz Stabilize receiver LO phase ( more of effect
of spur gets soaked up in clock, provided spur amplitude and phase are stable)
Correct for spurs at analysis stage (e.g., phasedoctor)
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
9
A new kind of spurious signal
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
10
A new kind of spurious signal (cont’d)
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
11
Example of S-band spur spectrum
Onsala S-band pcal amplitude spectrum
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
12
Example of S-band spur spectrum (cont’d)
Onsala S-band spur power spectrum, relative to pcal
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
13
Baseband filters
Delays through analog filters of same type may differ by ~5 ns at 8 MHz BW.
Delay may change with temperature by ~10%. With single pcal tone at band-edge, delay
change appears as phase change of ~1°, or 4 ps in MBD.
Cures: Use phase cal tone near center of band. Use multiple phase cal tones to measure changes in
filter phase/delay characteristics (but beware spurious signals).
Go digital!
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
14
Mismatched baseband spectra in the extreme
Gilcreek-Kokee channel X5 in RD0505: DRF & xpower spectrum
Impedance mismatch in Gilcreek samplerformatter cable causing severe distortion in baseband spectrum
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
15
Extreme baseband spectra (cont’d)
RD0505 X-band closure MBDs for 4 stations: Gc (A), Ap (G), Ny (N), and Wz (V)
SNR = 100-300 for all scans
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
16
Cable calibration
Short-term stability of typical cable cal system = 1-3 ps rms
Cable cal adds 1-3 ps noise to corrected delay.
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
17
Correlation/fringe-fitting errors
From Alan Rogers (1991):
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
18
Correlation/fringe-fitting errors (cont’d)
(Non)dependence of total X-band MBD on residual SBD –MBD differences from repeated processings using
different clock models
Residual SBD (ns)
RMS MBD diff= 4 ps
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
19
Correlation/fringe-fitting repeatability
Distributions of R1113 X-band observable differences from repeated processings
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
20
Correlation/fringe-fitting repeatability (cont’d)
Dependence of R1113 X-band MBD differences from repeated processings on SNR
σ[ ΔMBD/ σ(MBD) ] = 0.12-0.16
0.14 is expected value if two sets of input data are disjoint by 2%
But input data for two processings are typically disjoint by ~1% mildly inconsistent.
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
21
Fringe-fitting challenges
How do you handle a case like this??
2005 October 17 East Coast Geodetic VLBI Meeting
22
Fringe-fitting challenges (cont’d)