2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

25
2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Church College of New Zealand David O McKay Building

description

 

Transcript of 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

Page 1: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

2003 Beca Structural Engineering

Report

Church College of New ZealandDavid O McKay Building

Page 2: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 3: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 4: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 5: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 6: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 7: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 8: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 9: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

One of two massive trusses between the Gym and Auditorium.  You can see the pillar on the right in the construction photo you have on your web site.

Page 10: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 11: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

Cross bracing element showing turn buckle for stiffening.  Note also the ceiling hangers and attached blocks.  These days they use strapping rather than wire.  The also use gang nails rather than blocks as seen here.

Page 12: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 13: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

Spacing blocks welded between cross member right angles.  Another indication that the architects and engineers were aware of the need to brace against lateral loads from seismic events.  The blocks multiply the resistance against bending.

Page 14: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 15: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 16: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 17: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 18: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

These are the cross bracing connections at the bottom of the trusses.  The location of the cross braces also indicate the architect and engineers appreciation for earthquake strengthening.  These braces are more substantial than what is used for today's cross bracing to meet seismic building codes. Note the spacing of the ceiling joists and even the boards along the access ways are placed to exact measurement.  This is the sign of "A True Tradesmen" as they say in the Construction business.

Page 19: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

This images shows how trusses rest on top of reinforced concrete beams and directly above reinforced concrete pillars.  This indicates the fact that the architect designed the building to withstand seismic events not just wind loads as implied by the Beca report.  The photo was taken in the ceiling cavity of the David O McKay Building.  The bottom of the trusses are attached to brackets with a loop connection to the inside of the pillars.

Page 20: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 21: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

This is the bottom bracket.  The bracket is welded to the truss.  You can see from this image that the concrete is correctly compacted.

Page 22: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review
Page 23: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

These are the roof rafters.  They have are massive measuring 4"x16" they support the 2"x6" sarking and the ceiling rafters between trusses by way of number 8 twisted wire.  (Now that part is very much a Kiwi tradition that is widely used in place of strapping, it allows the builders to adjust the ceiling height with simple turns of the twist thereby giving you a perfect ceiling.  These may have been added later.

Page 24: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

Roof Leak due to poor maintenance

Page 25: 2003 Beca Structural Engineering Report Review

Winch for one of the basketball hoops.  Note the poor maintenance of ducting insulation.