2000 – 2010 Israel Competitiveness 2000 – 2010 Israel 2021.
-
Upload
janis-miles -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
2
Transcript of 2000 – 2010 Israel Competitiveness 2000 – 2010 Israel 2021.
Israel Competitiveness 2000 – 2010
Israel 2021
• competitive ranking has been decreasing constantly;
• What does it (really) mean?
• No such thing as “general Competitiveness”
• 12 distinct pillars comprised of • Ranks in 90 Parameters:
Israel - General Trend
Israel GCI Rank
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
2004 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Israel GCI Score
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
2004 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Substance is in the “Little” Details..
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1st pillar: Institutions
2nd pillar: Infrastructure
3rd pillar: Macroeconomic stability
4th pillar: Health and primary education
5th pillar: Higher education and training
6th pillar: Goods market efficiency
7th pillar: Technological readiness
8th pillar: Business sophistication
9th pillar: Innovation
2004
2006
2009
Stages of Research
• STAGE 1: Israel over time
• 9 View Points• Tracing main tendencies• Strength & Weaknesses
in 90 parameters
• STAGE 2: Israel v. 133 Economies
• Isolating 21 economies – Israel’s neighborhood
• Are there typical pillars of Strength or Weaknesses?
STAGE 3: Comparing all findings
with IMD reports
012345678
2006
2009
Israel - Main Findings
• Main reasons for deterioration are:– Governmental bureaucracy & unstable policy;– Market Dominance– Education System– Infrastructures;– police services.
• Main Strengths:– Innovation
• Scientific R&D, Patents, Capacity– Entrepreneurship– Technological readiness
Mapping Weaknesses
Mapping Strengths
Israel-Hungary: comparison between all 12 GCI pillars
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.51st pillar: Institutions 5%
2nd pillar: Infrastructure 5%
3rd pillar: Macroeconomic stability 5%
4th pillar: Health and primary education 5%
5th pillar: Higher education and training 8.5%
6th pillar: Goods market efficiency 8.5%
7th pillar: Labor market efficiency 8.5%
8th pillar: Financial market sophistication 8.5%
9th pillar: Technological readiness 8.5%
10th pillar: Market size 8.5%
11th pillar: Business sophistication 15%
12th pillar: Innovation 15%
New Zealand* 20
Israel 27
Israel-New Zealand: comparison between all 12 GCI pillars
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
1st pillar: Institutions 5%
2nd pillar: Infrastructure 5%
3rd pillar: Macroeconomic stability 5%
4th pillar: Health and primary education 5%
5th pillar: Higher education and training8.5%
6th pillar: Goods market efficiency 8.5%
7th pillar: Labor market efficiency 8.5%
8th pillar: Financial market sophistication8.5%
9th pillar: Technological readiness 8.5%
10th pillar: Market size 8.5%
11th pillar: Business sophistication 15%
12th pillar: Innovation 15%
New Zealand*20
Israel 27
Israel-Austria: comparison between all 12 GCI pillars
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.51st pillar: Institutions 5%
2nd pillar: Infrastructure 5%
3rd pillar: Macroeconomic stability 5%
4th pillar: Health and primary education 5%
5th pillar: Higher education and training8.5%
6th pillar: Goods market efficiency 8.5%
7th pillar: Labor market efficiency 8.5%
8th pillar: Financial market sophistication8.5%
9th pillar: Technological readiness 8.5%
10th pillar: Market size 8.5%
11th pillar: Business sophistication 15%
12th pillar: Innovation 15%
Austria 17
Israel 27
What are the Deterioration Engines ?
Institutions - Public sector: deterioration Factors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
1.08 Burden ofgovernmentregulation
1.14 Organizedcrime (1.11)
1.15 Reliability ofpolice services
Concentrations level
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Goodsmarketefficiency
Extent ofmarketdominance
Infrastructure: Deterioration Factors
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2.02 Quality ofroads
2.03 Quality ofrailroadinfrastructure
2.04 Quality ofportinfrastructure
Deterioration in education components
• During 2001-2004 Israel ranked as a leading country in Education paramaters
• As of 2004, Israel’s ranking severly deteriorating (see also PISA exams).
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Secondaryenrollment
Quality of theeducational system
Quality of math andscience education
Quality ofmanagement schools
The Eminent Danger –
Deterioration in Strength Engines
Innovation as a reflection of Israeli Education (2001-2010)
• Borrowed time
• how long will it take for the deterioration in EDUCATION will be erase Israel’s competitive advantage in INNOVATION?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
4.10 Primaryenrollment
5.01 Secondaryenrollment
5.02 Tertiaryenrollment
9th pillar:Innovation
Conclusions for a New Beginning..
• Israel has very definite “Power Engines”• All of them rely heavily on Human Capital
(Education)
• Israel Weakness are also concrete & Steady:– Outdated Public Sector– Concentration– Connecting Infrastructures (Ports & Roads)