1st Technical Meeting - WP1

Project SLOPE1

WP 1– Definition of requirements and system analysis

Project SLOPE2

T 1.1 – User requirements

Mikkeli, July 02th, 2014

Scope3

This task aimed to: Identify users that will use SLOPE tools Understand their needs of SLOPE Understand the system requirements so it is useful for users

Status: Finished

Al information included in “D1.01 user requirements report” Finished.

Partners involved: all ITENE (leader), GRAPHITECH, CNR, KESLA, COAST, MHG,

BOKU, FLY, GRE, TRE

Deliverable Index4

Revision History5

Process6

1. Identifying usergroups

2. Defining SLOPE functionalities

3. Creatingrelation matrix

4. Developingquestions fromfunctionalities

5. Finalisedquestionnaires

6. Contacts withend users

7. Analysis of results

Use Cases7

Biomass Processing Companies

Number of questionnaires8

Total: 23 questionnaires

Locations: Austria, Italy (Trento), Finland, Ireland

Specifications9

PlanningFor selecting a harvesting area, the system should:

Consider cost and demand as a factor to select a harvesting areaDetermine the volume of timber available in the harvesting zoneAllow to know the age of treesMeasure tree’s heightDetermine slope and roughness of the terrainDetermine accessibility of the zone (road placement…)

For marking a tree, the system should:Measure dimensions of treesDetermine quality of woodRegister specie and age of treesBe able of read all this information just before marking a treeIdentify trees unmistakably

Specifications10

For cable corridors placing, the system should: Allow the estimation of total amount of timber to be harvested. Consider the slope of the cable. Allow the selection of the intermediate support.

For landing placement determination, the system should:Measure and locate available extensions for landing.

In order to obtain cost estimations, the system should: Calculate costs of harvesting, cable corridor installation and marking of tress. Integrate individual costs related to machine, labour, overhead, transport, infrastructures costs and others like clearing meadows or watersides, artificial anchors, locking public roads.

Specifications11

For planning a forest road, the system should: Determine access points to the forest area. Estimate the amount of timber available. Consider other activities in the forest beneficiaries of the construction. Calculate necessary parameters of the road: width, layers, curve radio, maximum longitudinal slope and maximum transversal slope.

ExploitationFor harvesting monitoring and tree identification, the system should:

Obtain and predict the weather conditions. Estimate market demands. Obtain values of productivity and statistics of development of harvesting activities (related to the plan). Detect unmistakably each tree, accordingly to how it was marked. Show tree data before harvesting operation.

Specifications12

For define traceability, the system should: Determine main characteristics of logs and locate them in the forest. Have a complete traceability system (all stages) or at least extend traceability to transport activities (outside the forest). Update data with a desirable minimum frequency of 10 minutes.

For developing contingency plans, the system should: Predict possible failures or breakages Obtain and predict the weather conditions.

Specifications13

Information and Sales moduleFor implementing online purchases, the system should:

Measure dimensions of logs and humidity Determine quality of wood Register species of trees Develop a platform including mentioned characteristics and specifying provenance of logs.

For inventory logs, the system should: Identify logs in different states (standing, ready to be harvested or harvested) Determine accessibility of the zone (road placement…) Determine quality of wood

For demand determination, the system should:Measure dimensions of logs and humidity Determine quality of wood

Annex14

Contact info15

Juan de Dios Díaz [email protected]

Emilio Gonzalez [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]


16

Thanks for your attention!!!

Project SLOPE17

T 1.2 - Hardware and equipment definition

• Tracking systems (ITENE)

Mikkeli, July 2th, 2014

Truck18

TruckTruck

Commercial RFID Fixed UHF

Truck with a Control Unit RS232 /ethernet

SLOPE FIS SystemGPRS

Need to be programmed to control reader, to measure

GPS and send data GPRS

In charge: ITENE

Need to be programmed to receive and store data

In charge: MHG?Leads WP5 FIS Development

Commercial Firmware

IF2 from INTERMEC4 external antennasEthernetSerial PortISO 18000-6CEPC Class 1 Gen 212V DC, 30W4 input, 4 outputs

MCU (rpi)EthernetUSBSerial port (UART)GPS and GPRS (through board SIM908)GPIOHDMI512M RAM

BRI commands

XML

RFID Reader19

Tree Marking20

Tree Marking

Commercial RFID handheld UHF

Smartphone

Base station with wifi installed in forest

BLUETOOTH

WIFI SLOPE FIS SystemGPRS

Need to be programmed / developed

In charge: CNR?Leads 3.1 Tree Marking

Software included

Need an app to be programmed

In charge: CNR?Leads 3.1 Tree Marking

GPRS



C-qID from CAENIP54USB, BluetoothISO 18000-6CEPC Class 1 Gen 2

L9 from LG BluetoothNFC (not needed)

Crane21

CraneCrane


CRANERS232 /Ethernet


Need to be programmed to control reader and to

store / send received data

In charge: GRE?Leads 3.3 intelligent crane



Commercial Firmware


BRI commands

XML

Processor22

ProcessorProcessor


ProcessorRS232 /ethernet


Need to be programmed to control reader and to

store / send received dataBRI comands

In charge: GRE?



Commercial Firmware


BRI commands

XML

SLOPEIntegrated proceSsing and controL systems fOr sustainable forest Production in mountain arEas

Technical Meeting 2-4/Jul/2014

WORK PACKAGE 1: DEFINITION OFREQUIREMENTS AND SYSTEM ANALYSIS

TASK: 1.3 HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE (HMI) DEFINITION

THEME: Integrated processing and Control Systems forSustainable Production in Farms and ForestsDuration: 36 MonthsPartners: 10Coordinating institution: Fondazione GraphitechCoordinator: Dr. Raffaele De Amicis


Agenda

• Tasks Overview• User Interface Analysis• User Interface Requirements

• From D.1.1

• Use Cases

• Human Machine Interfaces• Desktop, Mobile, In-Vehicle

• Risks and Mitigation Actions• Questions

Task Overview


Start: February 2014End: April 2014Leader: GRAPHITECHPartners: KESLA, MHG, GRE, RTE, ITENE

Define user interface for the whole SLOPE system:• Specify user interface needs • Specify web user interface requirements• Specify user interface in-vehicle and on field devices

The FIS will be accessed and edited using several devices (mobile, web, in-vehicle unit) into different conditions (office planning, on field harvest operation). Due to these very wide requirements a detailed investigation of the possible interactions and of the design of the different machine interfaces should be performed specially in terms of views and usability. The aim is to create demos from specified views, in different conditions and purposes. Particular attention will be paid to the mobile and on vehicle interface for ease of access and usability into on-field conditions (GRAPHITECH). The mobile and web interface will be designed by MHG and TRE to allow forestry data analysis and synthesis using charts, diagrams and maps on specific database views.

User Interface Analysis


“Human-Machine Interfaces can be seen as the parts, software or hardware handling the interaction between humans and machines[…] Computer can have several different purposes ending in an open-ended dialog between users and computer.”



Analysis of each available interface and classification against different types of HMI:

• Direct manipulation interface• Graphical user interface (GUI)• Web User interfaces (WUI)• Command Line Interfaces• Touch User Interfaces• Hardware User Interfaces• Batch Interfaces• Gesture interfaces• Intelligent User Interfaces• Non-Command User interfaces• Object Oriented User interfaces• Tangible User Interfaces• Task-Focused Interfaces

• Text based interfaces• Zero Input Interfaces



Forestry Resource Planning System (MHG)• Graphical user interface• Web-based interface• Touch user interface (Mobile)

Forest Analysis and Monitoring (TREE)• Graphical User Interface• Web-based user interface• Touch User Interface (Mobile)• Hardware Interface• Batch Interface

Intelligent Harvesting Heads• Graphical User interface• Touch user interface (In-Vehicle)• Intelligent user interface



Cable Crane System (GRE)• Direct manipulation interface• Hardware interface• Task focused interface

Geographical Information System for Environmental Planning (GRAPHITECH)

• Graphical User Interface• Web-based Interface• Touch User Interface (Mobile)• Gesture Interface (Mobile)• Task focused interface

User Interface Requirements


• From user requirements report (D.1.1)• Requirements list

• From reference SLOPE scenario• HMI focused Use Case Diagrams• By End User• By Desktop/Mobile/In-Vehicle


• Selecting and planning harvesting area• Provide trees information (height, age)• Provide area information (available timber volume, )• Determine slope and roughness of the terrain• Determine accessibility of the zone (road placement, road width, road slope, landing areas…)

• Tree marking• Register specie and age of trees• Be able of read all this information just before marking a tree

• Cable Corridors• Allow the estimation of total amount of timber to be harvested.• Allow the selection of the intermediate support.

• Cost Estimations• Show harvesting costs based on user’s planning choices

• Traceability• Provide location of logs


• Harvesting monitoring/tree identification• Show weather conditions and forecast.• Estimate market demands.• Obtain values of productivity and statistics of development of harvesting activities (related to the plan).• Detect unmistakably each tree, accordingly to how it was marked.• Show tree data before harvesting operation.

• Contingency plans• Show possible failures or breakages

• Online Purchases• Register species of trees• Develop a platform including mentioned characteristics and specifying provenance of logs

• Inventory• Show logs in different states (standing, ready to be harvested or harvested)• Show accessibility of the zone (road placement…)• Show quality of wood

HMI Use Cases – Desktop Forest Op.

HMI Use Cases – Desktop Forest Pl.

HMI Use Cases – Mobile On The Field Harvesting Operator and Forestry Expert

HMI Use Cases – In-Vehicle Cable and Truck Operators

Human Machine Interfaces Design

• Based on principle of least astonishment• human beings can only pay attention to one thing at one time• exploit users' pre-existing knowledge as a way to minimize the learning

curve• functionally similar or analogous programs with which your users are

likely to be familiar

• Takes in account a conservative sector like Forestry• Takes in account MHG and TREE platforms

HMI Design - Desktop

• Web based application (HTML5/WebGL Based or Java Applet)• Final Technology TBD on T.1.5 System Architecture

• Can be easily included into MHG system as a Life-Ray widget

• TREE integration/connection to be understand

• Needs access to the SLOPE DB


Menu bar with common fucntions for the Slope System like editing or open/save the project

Toolbar with the different typology of functions

Tools related to the category of function selected

Information Hub. With data about climate and weather

Operation Calendar

3D Area


Main Functionalities:• Analytics: set of tools to retrieve geometrical and geophysical (like

slopeness and soil components) information about the property and aboutthe places of interest for determined operation or dataset

• Operation: tools to manage different operation related to harvesting and toplan them in determined temporal interval

• Forest: Tools to inspect the forestry inventory datasets and all the operationrelated to forest resource planning.

HMI Design - Desktop - Analytics

Get information and graphics about slopeness of the terrain

Inspect Soil/Terrain information with graphics and view on the map

Boundaries and Property infos of the forest area

HMI Design - Desktop - Analytics

Measure, distances, areas, etc.

HMI Design – Desktop - Analytics

View of the Ground lidar scan or images of a POI

Inspect datasheet and chart about a forestry operation area identified in a determined point of interest

HMI Design – Desktop - Operation

Road construction and set property boundary

Add a new operation to the scenario by adding the actors involved

Insert in the scenario all the structure to plan the operation

HMI Design – Desktop - Operation

It’s possible to set upthe cable waydragging thecomponent directlyto the map and settheir parameters.

Set all theparameters ofthe cablewaythrough acontextualmenu

Retrieve infos about every cable line in the forest area for the date selected

HMI Design – Desktop -Forest

Inspect resources information for standing/harvested tree or from logs in the forest area

Possibility to inspect information about single tree to help a more accurated virtual marking Inspect effeclty

physical tagged tree and marked virtually tree

HMI Design – Desktop - Forest

Information of the tree to support the marking decision

Select the marktypologyto make

Highlight Selection

HMI Design - Mobile

Main Functionalities:• Subset of desktop functionalities

• Exploits mobile device capabilities (e.g. GPS, Camera)

• 2D (3D/AR modes optional)

• Tagging support for Forest Operators

• Can work in parallel with MHG and TREE mobile systems (Android OS).

HMI Design – Mobile – Forest Operator

HMI Design – In-Vehicle

Main Functionalities:• Enrich already existing In-Vehicle systems

• Based on:• TREE RTFI: Harvest Production Monitoring & Control• In-Vehicle Harvesting Head control system

• Feasibility to be assessed

• To be finalized

HMI Design – In-Vehicle

Real-Time Sensor DataTree Marked Data

Enriched Map

Quality Index Estimation

Harvesting Head Control System TREE RTFI

Risks and Mitigations

Pending Items• D.1.2 Human Machine Interfaces To Be Completed

• 75% Completed

• Some Mock-ups Refinements Needed• Mobile• In-Vehicle

Remedial Actions• D.1.2 Human Machine Interfaces Ready by 8.07.14

• Mock-ups revised by 8.07.14


Open Discussion


Thank you for your attention

DANIELE MAGLIOCCHETTI

[email protected]

Fondazione GraphitechVia Alla Cascata 56C38123 Trento (ITALY)

Phone: +39 0461.283395Fax: +39 0461.283398


SLOPE WP 1 – Task 1.4

Task leader: Mariapaola Riggio, PhDCNR IVALSA

Mountainous Forest inventory data model defini=on

Task 1.4: participants

• CNR (Task Leader)

•Graphitech

• Coastway

• Flyby S.r.l.

•TreeMetrics

•BOKU

•MHG

•Greifenberg

Task 1.4: general descriptionAIMs:

1. Define the required informa=on for the FIS data popula=on

2. Define data and metadata model of the FIS (integraFon of heterogeneous data)

CNR and BOKU Conceptualize the informaFon into a Forest InformaFon data model, also considering current standards and best pracFce in forest management

MHG and TreemetricsUse resulFng data and metadata modelas base schema for the mountainousforest informaFon system database.

All the partnersDefine the data andmetadata for the specific field of applicaFon (3D forest model, characterizaFon of the forest and of the forest producFon, harvesFng process)

ParFcipants Role

Task 1.4: delivered output

• Deliverable D1.03 (month 6 – June 2014) :Data and Metadata Model Report

Report delivered on the 30th of June 2014

Final reviewed version will be issued on the 11th of July 2014

D1.0.3 / Table ofContents

123456

Introduc=onData formats and standards Integrated modelsOverview of exis=ng databases/servicesRequired informa=on to populate the Forest Inventory System References

Annex A:Tables of datasets for FIS popula2onAnnex B:Tables of data on forest produc2on quality and availabilityAnnex C:Tables of data derived from the FIS

Chapter 2 :Data formats and standards

Spa2al Data

Standards for Openness and Technical Interoperability – INSPIRE

Spectral data

Data collected by the harves2ng machines

Sensor standards

Forestry related standards

AutomaEc IdenEficaEon and data capture

Standards in EnEty IdenEficaEon

Geographic Standards


Spa2al DataAnalysing the SLOPE requirements, several typologies of spa=al data are related to the forest informaFon system. We can include: forest and trees features, land parcels, road network and landing areas sawmills posiFons, elevaFon and slope of a certain region etc. How these informaFon would be geometrically represented and in relaFon to this, how they will be modelled according to acquisiFon system used to retrieve the informaFon?In SLOPE project we will have different source of geographic informa=on and each of these produce different typologies of spaFal data, which a`er a processing step will generate new spaFal data.


Spectral DataSeveral typologies of spectral data are related to the forest informaFon system. We can include (rela=ng to the characteriza=on scale): forest features, single tree characterisFcs, log quality, early ring properFes, sub structural morphology of wood cell wall.Various sources affect the spectral data representaFon.Different spectral analysis methods arecovered in this secFon: spectroscopy for the analysis of wood chemical--physical properFes, hyperspectral imaging of wood, hyperspectral imaging of forest.

Chapter 2 :Data formats and standardsData collected by the harves2ng machines Relevant variables, represenFng the characterisFcs of the harvesFng system in the SLOPE scenario, will be measured with transducers/sensors. Some of the measured variables aim at monitoring machine’sparameters, enabling security, energy--saving, real--Fme control and automaFon funcFonaliFes. Some machine’s parameters will be also correlated to quality indices of the harvested material (e.g. cudng quality index).Another series of data are those collected by the sensors to determine parameters related to the wooden material characteris=cs (i.e. data from NIR and hyperspectral sensors, data from stress wave tests) or to measure geometrical features of the logs.

Chapter 3 :Integrated models

Mul2source data

Mul2scala data

Mul2temporal data

The realizaFon of forest inventories is strongly related to the harmoniza=on of different data provided by different sources (different remote sensing or ground--based measurements) with different scales (different spaFal and temporal resoluFons) and different units. This process can be performed by means of dedicated elaboraFons and databases with geographical referencing funcFonaliFes (GIS).

Chapter 4 :Overview of existing databases/services

• EU forest datasets

• Datasets available in the SLOPE pilot areas

ITAL

Y –

Tren

to P

rovi

nce

AUST

RIA

–Sal

zbur

g

Chapter 5 :Required information to populate the FIS

to develop an interac2ve system for cableway posi2oning simula2on (CwPT)

to assist tree marking – forestry measurements es2ma2ons (TMT)

to define technology layers (harvest parameters) (TLT)

to support novel inventory data content (IDC)

Annex A:TABLES OF DATASETS FOR FIS POPULATION

TABLE A1: FOREST

Annex A:TABLES OF DATASETS FOR FIS POPULATION

TABLE A 2: INFRASTRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS TABLE A 3: HYDROGRAPHY

TABLE A.5: RISK FACTORS

TABLE A.5: COMMUNICATION

Annex B: TABLES OF DATA ON FOREST

PRODUCTION QUALITY ANDAVAILABILITY

Annex C:TABLES OF DATA DERIVED FROM THE FIS

Conclusions

2° MeeFng

Report D1.03 is a reference for the implementaFon of:

D2.01 Remote Sensing data and analysis D2.02 UAV data and analysisD2.03 TLS data and analysis

D2.04 the Harvest simulaFon toolD2.05 the Road and logisFc simulaFon module

Data and metadata model defined in the D1.03 will be the base for the implementaFon of the mountainous forest informaFon system database (WP5)

The report D1.03 defines also data acquired by means of non--destrucFve or semi-- destrucFve tesFng techniques, for the mulF--sensor characterizaFon of the harvested material. A prerequisite for this is the definiFon of the technical characterisFcs of the hardware/sensors instrumenFng the harvesFng machines (Task 1.2 – D1.04).

Thanks to:

2° MeeFng

CONTRIBUTORS and REVIEWERS:

Juan de Dios Diaz (ITENE) Barbara Hinterstoisser (BOKU) Enda Keane (Treemetrics) MarFn Kühmaier (BOKU) Andrea Masini (Flyby)Enda Nolan (Coastway) David O’ Reilly (Coastway) Gianni Picchi (CNR)Federico Prandi (Graphitech) Anna Sandak (CNR)Jakub Sandak (CNR)Veli--Mad Plosila (MHG)

Mariapaola Riggio, PhD CNR--IVALSANaFonal Research Council of Italy Trees and Timber InsFtuteVia Biasi 75, 38010 San Michele all'Adige (TN) ItalyTel. +39 0461 660232Fax. +39 0461 650045E.mail:[email protected]

Thanks!


Month 6 Meeting 2-4/july/2014

D1.04 Technical requirements report

Fleet management systems

Kühmaier M, Holzleitner FInstitute of Forest EngineeringUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna

2 July 2014

Mikkeli Meeting 2-4/july/2014

WP1 Hardware

Separation of Point Cloud to aid creation of DEM by classifying ground data from canopy data

The Products

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

16cm

7cm7cmPulp

7cmPulpPulp M3?

Large Sawlog M3?

Small Sawlog M3?

• Taper Variation• Straightness• Branching• Rot etc.

The Products: General Values

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

16cm

7cm7cmPulp

7cmPulpPulp = €20 per M3

Large Sawlog = €60 per M3

Small Sawlog = €40 per M3

The Problem - “The Collision of Interests”

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

16cm

7cm7cmPulp

7cmPulpPulp M3?

Large Sawlog M3?

Small Sawlog M3?

Maximise Value

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

16cm

7cm7cmPulp

7cmPulpPulp M3?

Large Sawlog M3?

Small Sawlog M3?

Maximise Value: Sawlog Lengths

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

16cm

7cm7cmPulp

7cmPulpPulp M3?

Large Sawlog M3?

Small Sawlog M3?

3.7mOption 1


14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

16cm

7cm7cmPulp

7cmPulpPulp M3?

Large Sawlog M3?

Small Sawlog M3?

4.3mOption 2


14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

7cm

14cm

16cm

7cm7cmPulp

7cmPulpPulp M3?

Large Sawlog M3?

Small Sawlog M3?

4.9mOption 3

Harvester Optimisation

Log Quality: Straightness (Sweep), Taper, Branching ,Rot,

Our Offering

Forest Mapper - First In The World – Online Forest Mapping & Analysis - Data Management System

Forest Mapper: Automated net area calculation, stratification and Location for ground sample plots to be collected

Sample Plots

Net Area

Stratification

(Inventory Planning)

Terrestrial Laser Scanning Forest Measurement System(AutoStem Forest)

Automated 3D Forest Measurement System

Trusted and Independent Data

Forest Valuation: Online Data

Current Forest Value

Mobile Field Survey App – Report Sharing -Interconnectivity

Latest Development

• Online Market Place• 15,000 forest owners• Irish Farmers Association

WP1 T1.5 - System Architecture

Task leader: MHG

Deliverable: D1.05 System Architecture Specifications

Designed delivery time: M6

Deliverable status: In progress, 60% ready

Estimated delivery time: 31th July 2014

Situation: Draft is ready. Waiting partner’s input about integrations and technologies. Interface specifications need to be done. Goal is to finalize deliverable on July 2014.

Mikkeli 02-04 July 2014

T1.5 Objectives


• Design the technology specification of the system architecture

• Specify applications and technologies to be used• Use service oriented architecture design principles• Design model and interfaces for application

integrations in different integration levels• Design deployment platform

Kick-off Meeting 8-9/jan/2014

T 1.5 Key points of the design

• SLOPE architecture should respect SOA design• Architecture should use open source technologies• Partner’s applications should be easily integrated

to the SLOPE platform• Maximal use of partner’s existing applications and

technologies• Use flexible and agile integration technologies• Use standards if available• Use ready components if available


System Architecture Overview


Presntation level integration

• Use Liferay application integration strategies described in the deliverable. Iframe, Web Proxy or native Portlet integration.

• Publish new applications with Liferay framework

• Map presentations (with OpenLayers)


Example of Liferay integration


Data and application level level integration

• Publish all needed interfaces to the SLOPE FIS Database

• GeoServer for GIS services• SOAP web services for data

integration implemented with Java EE patterns.

• All communication should go through services. No direct database access.


Deployment platform

• Use cloud platform for deployment• Deployment platform should be very

scalable and easy to configure• SLOPE FIS could easily run for ex. on

Jelastic platform• With Jelastic we can add more resources

on the fly• SLOPE FIS can be also deployed to

standard virtual cloud server instance like Amazon. But it needs more configuration.


Summary

• Task deliverable will be finalized on July-August 2014• Deliverable is waiting for partners input• Designed architecture will be very flexible and easy to understand

Thank you!

WP1. Definition of Requirements and System Architecture


•Task 1.1 - Users and System requirements – ITENE• Partners: GRAPHITECH, CNR, KESLA, COAST, MHG, BOKU, FLY, GRE, TRE

• Task 1.2 Hardware and equipment definition – KESLA• Partners: CNR, COAST, MHG, BOKU, FLY, GRE, ITENE

• Task 1.3 Human Machine Interface (HMI) definition – GRAPHITECH• Partners: KESLA, MHG, GRE, TRE, ITENE

• Task 1.4 Mountainous Forest inventory data model definition – CNR• Partners: GRAPHITECH, COAST, MHG, BOKU, FLY, GRE, TRE

• Task 1.5 - System Architecture - MHG• Partners: GRAPHITECH, FLY, TRE, ITENE

WP1. Objectives


• Identify the users and specifically their needs and requirements.• Define processes • Detail the data and metadata model covering the use of SLOPE• Define the hardware, equipment, sensors and mobile devices• Define the Human Machine Interface requirements• Define the system architecture to be used.• Define the technical requirements

WP1 Orginal timeline and WP1 situation– M01-M06

January February March April May June

ITENE:Task 1.1: D1.01UsersRequirementsReportKESLA:Task 1.2: D1.04TechnicalRequirementsReport

Project meeting in

Mikkeli

GRAPHITECH:Task 1.3: D1.02HumanMachine Interface

CNR:Task 1.4: D1.03Data and Meta Data modelReportMHG:Task 1.5: D1.05System ArchitectureSpecifications


WP1 Task 1.1 - Users and System requirements

Task leader: ITENE

Deliverable: D1.01 Users Requirements Report

Designed deliverable time: M3

Deliverable status: Ready

Summary: No big issues. Delay from partner’s input. Finished correctly. Deliverable can be found from final deliverables folder in Dropbox.


WP1 Task 1.2 - Hardware and equipment definition

Task leader: KESLA (resigned from consortium on 25th May 2014)Will be finalized by all partners with GRAPHITECH lead.

Deliverable: D1.04 Technical Requirements Report

Designed deliverable time: M3


Deliverable status: In progress

Summary: Very late from the timetable. Task leader left from the consortium. Anyway deliverable is in pretty good situation. Partners will finalize this task together.


WP1 Task 1.3 - Human Machine Interface (HMI) definition

Task leader: GRAPHITECH

Deliverable: D1.02 Human Machine Interface



Estimated delivery time: 7-8 July 2014

Summary: Late but almost ready. 2 months in delay due to initial lack of feedbacks from some partners.


WP1 Task 1.4 - Mountainous Forest inventory data model definition

Task leader: CNR

Deliverable: D1.03 Data and Meta Data model Report




Summary: Final version will be ready on the 11th of July, after the meeting in Mikkeli, where some technical issues will be discussed. It is fundamental to receive feedback of the involved partners in time.


WP1 1.5 - System Architecture

Task leader: MHG

Deliverable: D1.05 System Architecture Specifications




Summary: Draft is ready. Waiting partner’s input about integrations and technologies. Goal is to finalize deliverable on July 2014.



WP1 Summary

• Will be finished in July 2014• Partner’s input and active communication is needed to finalize

all tasks correctly!

Thank you! Let’s move to task leader presentations.

1st Technical Meeting - WP1

Education

Transcript of 1st Technical Meeting - WP1