1905.full

download 1905.full

of 8

Transcript of 1905.full

  • 7/27/2019 1905.full

    1/8

    Ocular Associations of Diabetes Other ThanDiabetic RetinopathyV. SWETHA E. JEGANATHAN, MBBS1,2

    JIE JIN WANG, PHD1,3

    TIEN YIN WONG, MD, PHD1,3,4

    Diabetic retinopathy is the most well-known ocular complication of dia-betes and the leading cause of

    blindness among people 2064 years ofage in the U.S. (1). Up to 4 million Amer-icans with diabetes, 40 years of age andolder, have retinopathy, and nearly 1 mil-lion have sight-threatening retinopathy(2). In major clinical trials, tight control ofblood glucose and blood pressure hasbeen demonstrated to reduce the risk of

    retinopathy and associated blindness (3).A range of ocular diseases is also as-

    sociated with diabetes, which may lead tovisionloss. However, some of these ocularconditions may not be familiar to noneyeclinicians (4 6). In this review, we aim tohighlight the frequencies, clinical presen-tations, natural histories, and manage-m e n t o f t h e s e o c u l a r c o n d i t i o n s .Physicians who manage patients with di-abetes may benefit from knowledge ofthese associated conditions and are thusable to ensure adequate and timely refer-

    ral and treatment. Routine eye screeningfor retinopathy of individuals with diabe-tes offers the opportunity to detect theseother ocular diseases early, many ofwhich are sight threatening. Physician ed-ucation remains an important publichealth strategy in the prevention of visionloss in patients with diabetes.

    OCULAR CONDITIONS

    DIRECTLY ASSOCATED

    WITH DIABETES

    1. Cataracts and cataract surgeryCataract is a major cause of vision impair-ment in people with diabetes. Numerous

    studies have documented an associationbetween diabetes and cataracts. This asso-ciation is supported by an abundance ofdata from clinical epidemiological studiesand basic science studies (722). Bothcross-sectional and prospective data fromthree population-based studies, the Bea-ver Dam Eye Study, the Blue MountainsEye Study, and the Visual ImpairmentProject, have documented associationsbetween diabetes and both prevalent and

    incident posterior subcapsular cataractand, less consistently, with prevalent andincident cortical cataracts but not nuclearcataract (812,1419,23,25). The BlueMountains Eye Study showed that im-paired fasting glucose, in the absence ofclinical diabetes, was also a risk factor forthe development of cortical cataract (7).There is additional evidence that the riskof cataract increases with increasing dia-betes duration and severity of hyperglyce-mia (26). De posit ion of a dva nc e dglycation end products in the lens has

    been postulated as one possible patho-genic mechanism for diabetic cataract(27).

    Cataract surgery is the standard treat-ment for patients with cataract and signif-icant vision impairment. In individualswith diabetes, cataract occurs at a youngerage and progresses more rapidly, result-ing in higher rates of cataract surgery at arelatively young age (28). In the Wiscon-sin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Reti-n o p a t h y , t h e 1 0 - y e a r c u m u l a t i v eincidence of cataract surgery was 8% inthose with type 1 diabetes and 25% inthose with type 2 diabetes. Predictors ofcataract surgery included older age,

    greater severity of diabetic retinopathy,and baseline proteinuria in type 1 diabe-

    tes and older age and use of insulin in type2 diabetes (25).While the overall outcomes of cata-

    ract surgery are excellent, patients withdiabetes may have poorer vision out-comes than those without diabetes, andthe worst outcomes may occur in oper-ated eyes with active proliferative retinop-athy (29) and/or preexisting macularedema. To improve cataract surgical out-comes in patients with diabetes, adequatecontrol of diabetic retinopathy with lasertreatment before cataract surgery is nec-essary (30).

    The most devastating postoperativecomplication is endophthalmitis, a severeintraocular infection, with several studiesshowing that patients with diabetes havean increased risk of developing this com-plication (3134), resulting in pooreroutcomes (35). Patients with endoph-thalmitis characteristically present withpain, redness, discharge, decreased vi-sion, eyelid edema, proptosis, and con-

    junctival injection, with anterior chamberinflammation and vitritis. Management ofendophthalmitis consists of inpatient ad-

    mission for a combination of intravitreal,subconjunctival, and topical antibioticsand steroids and possibly ocular surgery.In patients with diabetes, treatment mayneed to be more aggressive, with surgeryperformed earlier rather than later (35).

    2. Anterior ischemic opticneuropathy

    Ante rior is chemic optic ne uropat hy(AION) is an acute vascular condition ofthe optic nerve. Studies suggest that up to25% of patients with AION have a history

    of diabetes (36). In patients with diabetes,diabetic microvascular disease affectingthe anterior part of the optic nerve isthought to cause the ischemia (37, 38).

    The optic disc in the contra-lateraleye of patients with AION is typicallysmall in diameter with a small or absentcup, referred to as a disc at risk. Patientswith AION usually present with moderateloss of vision upon awakening, presum-ably related to nocturnal systemic hypo-tension (39). Visual acuity is better than20/200 in 60% of cases at presentation(40). Untreated, AION generally remains

    From the1Centrefor Eye Research Australia,University of Melbourne,Victoria,Australia; the 2Singapore EyeResearch Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore; the 3Centre for VisionResearch, Universityof Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and the 4Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School ofMedicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

    Corresponding author: Tien Yin Wong, [email protected] 17 February 2008 and accepted 29 May 2008.DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0342 2008 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly

    cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be herebymarked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    R e v i e w s / C o m m e n t a r i e s / A D A S t a t e m e n t s

    R E V I E W A R T I C L E

    DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, NUMBER 9, SEPTEMBER 2008 1905

  • 7/27/2019 1905.full

    2/8

    stable, and recurrence in the same eye isunusual (41). Good recovery of visionwas observed in 43% of patients in theIschemic Optic Neuropathy Decompres-sion Trial (42).

    There are no proven treatments forAION, and the Ischemic Optic Neuropa-thy Decompression Trial revealed no ben-

    efit of optic nerve decompression surgery(43). Currently, neuroprotective agentsare being investigated for nonarteritic

    AION (NAION) and appear to be benefi-cial against secondary neuronal degener-ation in animal models of ischemic retinalganglion cell damage and optic nervecrush injury (44). There is no proven pro-phylaxis for AION, and the evidence forthe efficacy of aspirin therapy is limited(45).

    3. Diabetic papillopathy

    Diabetic papillopathy is an uncommonoptic nerve condition characterized byacute disc edema and mild vision loss(46). Diabetic papillopathy is a risk factorfor the progression of diabetic retinopa-thy (47); and, in rare instances, papillopa-thy can precede the development of

    AION (48). Early investigators postulateda toxic effect of abnormal glucose metab-olism on the optic nerve in individualswith diabetes; subsequent studies havesuggested that diabetic papillopathy maybe a mild and reversible form of AION(49).

    The significance of this condition istwofold. First, this condition may be mis-diagnosed as papilledema (50). Second,telangiectasia at the optic disc in diabeticpapillopathy may be mistaken as neovas-cularization in the opitc disc as part ofproliferative diabetic retinopathy, leadingto unnecessary laser photocoagulation.Diabetic papillopathy spontaneously im-proves within a year, and vision prognosisis usually good. In most patients, visionrecovers to a level 20/30 (51). Tighten-ing diabetes control and treating coexis-

    tent hypertension and renal dysfunctionmay help with resolution of this condi-tion. There is anecdotal evidence that in-traocular steroid injection may benefitpatients with vision impairment (52).

    4. Ocular movement disordersExtraocular motility disorders may occurin patients with diabetes, secondary to di-abetic neuropathy, involving the third,fourth, or sixth cranial nerve. Rarely, si-multaneous palsies of multiple extraocu-lar nerves can occur (53,54). Diabetes isthe underlying cause in 2530% of pa-

    tients aged 45 years and older who de-velop acute extraocular muscle palsy(55). In one study (56), 1% of patientswith diabetes were found to have cranialnerve palsies, compared with only 0.13%of control subjects. Of these cases, 41%had a third nerve palsy. In another popu-lation-based study, patients with sixth

    cranial nerve palsy were six times morelikely to have diabetes (57).

    Patients with extraocular palsiespresent with binocular diplopia. Pupilsparing is an important diagnostic featurein diabetes-related third cranial nervepalsy, distinguishing it from surgicalcauses, such as intracranial aneurysm ortumor. In diabetic cranial nerve palsies,recovery of extraocular muscle functiongenerally occurs within 3 months (58).Recurrences can be common and may in-volve the same or other cranial nerves.

    The presence of other focal neurologicalsigns, progressive deterioration, or palsyin a patient younger than 45 years shouldbe investigated to exclude a compressivelesion. In these instances, a neurology orneuro-ophthalmology consultation is rec-ommended.

    OCULAR CONDITIONS FOR

    WHICH DIABETES IS A

    KNOWN RISK FACTOR

    1. GlaucomaGlaucoma is a progressive optic neuropa-thy associated with typical optic discchanges and visual field defects. Elevatedintraocular pressure is the major risk fac-tor for glaucoma, although a proportionof patients with glaucoma do not haveraised intraocular pressure. Patients withdiabetes are at risk of two major types ofglaucoma: primary glaucoma and neovas-cular glaucoma.a. Primary glaucoma. Several large epi-demiological studies have reported posi-tive associations between diabetes withprimary open angle glaucoma (POAG),the most common form of primary glau-coma, or elevated intraocular pressure inthe absence of glaucoma optic neuropa-thy (5963). Glaucoma occurs more of-ten in patients with diabetes (5%) thanin the general population (2%) (64). Therisk of glaucoma has been reported to be1.6 4.7 times higher in individuals withdiabetes than in nondiabetic individuals(6568). In the Blue Mountains and Bea-ver Dam Eye studies, participants with di-abetes were twice as likely to have

    glaucoma as those without. However, notall population-based studies have identi-fied such an association (6973).

    There are clear biologically plausiblemechanisms supporting an associationbetween diabetes and POAG. First, mi-crovascular damage from diabetes couldimpair blood flow to the anterior optic

    nerve, resulting in optic nerve damage(37,38). Diabetes also impairs the auto-regulation of posterior ciliary circulation,which may exacerbate glaucomatous op-tic neuropathy (74). Second, patientswith diabetes often have concomitant car-diovascular risk factors (e.g., hyperten-sion) that may affect vascular perfusion ofthe optic nerve head (75). Finally, relativeto those without diabetes, individualswith diabetes may be more vulnerable toelevated intraocular pressure (76), withmore severe visual field loss at the same

    intraocular pressure level (77).It is important to screen for POAGamong individuals with diabetes, asPOAG can be asymptomatic until the latestages, when decreased vision and/or con-stricted visual fields are noted. Treatmentinvolves lowering intraocular pressurethrough topical eye drops and laser andsurgical procedures. Primary angle clo-sure glaucoma (PACG), the other com-mon primary glaucoma, is characterizedby narrow or closed anterior chamber an-gles, which impedes drainage of aqueoushumor and leads to raised intraocular

    pressure. Patients with PACG appear tobe more likely to have abnormal glucosetolerance than those with POAG or thosewithout glaucoma (78). Diabetes may beassociated with PACG via systemic auto-nomic dysfunction or increased lensthickness as a result of sorbitol overload(79,80). Patients with PACG may presentwith an acute attack, which is associatedwith severe ocular pain, headaches, andnausea, with substantially elevated in-traocular pressure. Acute PACG requiresurgent referral and treatment.

    b. Neovascular glaucoma. Studies haveshown a consistent association betweendiabetes and neovascular glaucoma (81),with proliferative retinopathy the leadingcause of this type of secondary glaucoma.Between 32 and 43% of neovascular glau-coma cases are caused by proliferativediabetic retinopathy (82,83). Neovascu-larization of the iris, an early precursor ofneovascular glaucoma, is commonly seenin patients with long-standing poorlycontrolled diabetes (84). Hypoxia in theretina and other ocular tissue causes anincreased expression of vascular endothe-

    Ocular associations of diabetes

    1906 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, NUMBER 9, SEPTEMBER 2008

  • 7/27/2019 1905.full

    3/8

    lial growth factor (VEGF), which stimu-lates new vessel formation in the iris (85)or in the anterior chamber angle (86).Neovascular glaucoma requires aggres-sive intervention to lower intraocularpressure with medication, followed bysurgery (87). Regression of neovascular-ization following pan-retinal laser photo-

    coagulation can occur if treated early(37,38).

    2. Ocular ischemic syndromeOcular ischemic syndrome (OIS) is an un-common vascular problem that resultsfrom chronic hypo-perfusion of the eye,most commonly caused by ipsilateral in-ternal carotid or ophthalmic artery occlu-sion (88). Patients with OIS typicallypresent with vision loss and dull ocularpain (87). The prevalence of diabetes inpatients with OIS is higher than in the

    general population (69), with one studyreporting that more than 50% of patientswith OIS have diabetes (89). Diabetes is amajor risk factor for carotid artery steno-sis and plaque formation, the underlyingcauses of OIS (90).

    The 5-year mortality rate among pa-tients with OIS has been reported to be40%or higher (91). Coexisting cardiovas-cular and cerebrovascular diseases are themain causes of death. Carotid ultrasonog-raphy is useful to delineate the presenceand severity of carotid artery stenosis. Al-though carotid endarterectomy lowers

    the risk of stroke in patients with symp-tomatic carotid stenosis (92), it is unclearwhether this procedure alters vision prog-nosis in eyes with OIS (93,94). The coex-istence of diabetes with OIS may be anindicator of poorer vision prognosis, dueto the higher incidence of secondary glau-coma (94). Pan-retinal laser photocoagu-lation is indicated in eyes with ocularneovascularization.

    OCULAR CONDITIONS

    WHERE DIABETES IS A

    POSSIBLE RISK FACTOR

    1. Retinal vein occlusionRetinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a retinalvascular condition characterized by di-lated tortuous retinal veins with retinalhemorrhages, cotton wool spots, andmacular edema. Central RVO occurs atthe optic disc (95), whereas branch RVOoccurs at retinal venular branches, usu-ally at the site of arterio-venous crossing(96). Central RVO may be subdivided fur-ther into nonischemic and ischemictypes, the latter associated with poorer vi-

    sion prognosis (97). Although it has beenthought that diabetes is a major risk fac-tor for RVO, epidemiological studieshave not shown a consistent relation-ship between diabetes and the presenceof RVO, with some studies reporting apositive association (98102) and oth-ers finding no association (103106).

    The importance of RVO in patients withdiabetes is that the retinal signs (e.g.,hemorrhages or cotton wool spots) maymimic diabetic retinopathy. Thus,when patients with diabetes presentwith acute vision loss and asymmetricsigns of diabetic retinopathy, RVOshould be considered.

    The management of RVO dependsupon the site of occlusion (central orbranch), degree of ischemia, presence ofmacular edema, visual acuity level, andcomplications. Approximately 30% of

    central RVO cases are initially nonisch-emic, but 10% progress to ischemiawithin 6 months (107). The two majorcomplications of RVO are secondary neo-vascular glaucoma and macular edema.Pan-retinal laser photocoagulation hasbeen shown to prevent neovascular glau-coma (108). No treatment has proven ef-fective for macular edema in patients withcentral RVO, although focal laser treat-ment may be useful in patients with mac-ular edema and branch RVO (109).Clinical trials are on-going to assess the

    intraocular administration of pharmaceu-tical agents, such as steroids (110) or an-tivascular endothelial growth factoragents (111,112).

    The vision prognosis with centralRVO, particularly ischemic central RVO,is poor, but that of branch RVO is rela-tively good, with nearly half of patientsmaintaining visual acuity better than20/40 (113). Patients with diabetes whodevelop RVO are more likely than theirnondiabetic counterparts to develop reti-nal neovascularization (114), neovascular

    glaucoma, and vitreous hemorrhage(112). More importantly, recent studiessuggest that, among those with diabetes4369 years of age, the presence of RVOis associated with double the risk of car-diovascular mortality (115).

    Management of concomitant medicalconditions (e.g., hypertension and dyslip-idemia) may be important to prevent arecurrence of RVO (116). There is nogood evidence that tight glycemic controlcan alter the course or improve the prog-nosis of RVO.

    2. Retinal arteriolar emboliRetinal arteriolar emboli are discreteplaque-like lesions lodged in the lumen ofretinal arterioles. The majority of emboliare asymptomatic and transient, althoughpatients infrequently present with epi-sodes of sudden, painless, monocularblindness (amaurosis fugax), a transient

    ischemic attack, or stroke (117).Population-based studies show that

    asymptomatic retinal emboli occur in1.31.4% of adults 40 years of age andolder (61,118). Studies show that retinalarteriolar emboli are associated with ca-rotid artery disease, hypertension, othercardiovascular risk factors (117), and anincreased risk of stroke and stroke-related(119,120) and all-cause (121) mortality.However, there are no consistent data onwhether retinal arteriolar emboli occurmore commonly in people with diabetes.

    In theBeaver Dam Eye Study, participantswith type 2 diabetes were found to have atwofold higher prevalence of retinal em-boli (60), but two other population-basedstudies have failed to confirm this associ-ation (61,105).

    Once an embolus has been detected, afull cardiovascular and cerebrovascularrisk assessment is recommended, includ-ing carotid artery ultrasound and echo-cardiography to assess the source of theemboli. Treatment of concomitant car-diovascular risk factors is vital and shouldinclude improved control of hyperglyce-

    mia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia,cessation of smoking, and carotid endar-terectomy, if indicated. Low-dose aspirincan be recommended to prevent retinalartery occlusion (122).

    3. Retinal artery occlusionRetinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a retinalvascular condition similar to emboli. Thehallmark of RAO is sudden, unilateral,painless loss of vision associated with avisual field defect. Patients with central

    RAO usually present with a dramatic lossof vision, an afferent pupillary defect, dif-fuse retinal whitening, and the resultantclassic cherry spot on the macula. Thefundoscopic findings with branch RAO,which occur at a branch, usually consistof a focal wedge-shaped area of retinalwhitening; vision loss also tends to bemuch milder. As for emboli, there is noclear evidence that patients with diabetesare at higher risk of RAO. However, theprevalence of diabetes among patientswith RAO has been reported to be as highas 21%, which is higher than in the gen-

    Jeganathan and Associates

    DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, NUMBER 9, SEPTEMBER 2008 1907

  • 7/27/2019 1905.full

    4/8

    e r a l p o p u l a t i o n o f t h e s a m e a g e(123,124).

    Patients with RAO should be referredimmediately to an ophthalmologist formanagement. In the acute phase (within24 h), a variety of treatments have beenproposed, such as ocular massage (to dis-lodge the embolus) and intravenous acet-

    azolamide injection (to lower intraocularpressure) (125). However, there is no ev-idence from randomized trials regardingthe efficacy of these treatments (126). It isimportant for physicians to measure theerythrocyte sedimentation rate to excludegiant cell arteritis (127). Regardless oftreatment, however, the vision prognosisof central RAO is poor (128).

    4. Corneal diseasesPatients with diabetes are known to ex-hibit abnormalities of the corneal epithe-

    l ium, le a ding t o c orne a l e rosion,persistent epithelial defect, or corneal ul-cers. Recurrent corneal erosions in pa-t i e n t s w i t h d i a b e t e s a r e u s u a l l yposttraumatic and the result of apparentlymild epithelial breakdown following cat-aract or vitreoretinal surgery (129131).

    A reduction in hemidesmosomes maycontribute to a weakness in the adhesionof diabetic corneal epithelium to the un-derlying stroma (132). In addition, eryth-rocyte aldose reductase increase has beenreported in patients with type 2 diabetes,leading to high accumulation of sorbitol,

    which can damage the corneal epithelium(133). In one study, corneal abnormali-ties (gerontoxon, limbal vascularization,punctate keratopathy, endothelial dystro-phy, recurrent erosion, and ulcers) weredetected in up to 73.6% patients with di-abetes (134). Patients with corneal dis-e as e o f te n p r es en t w it h p ai n ,photophobia, blurred vision, and hyper-emia. However, patients with diabetes of-ten have reduced corneal sensitivity aspart of diabetes complication in periph-eral nerves and limbal vasculopathy

    (135).Patients with diabetes who wear con-tact lenses must take extra hygiene careand be warned to seek advice early if anyirritation symptom develops to preventvision loss from microbial keratitis. Treat-ment of corneal disease includes topicalantibiotics and topical cycloplegic (shortterm), and corneal patching for 24 h isindicated if the original insult is of nonor-ganic nature (not from plant or soilsources), for large corneal lesions (2cm), and in noncontact lens users. Con-tact lensrelated conditions including

    corneal ulcers and large abrasions needurgent referral to the ophthalmologist. Allother corneal cases need to be reviewedt h e n e x t d a y b y t h e p r i m a r y c a r ephysician.

    CONDITIONS

    MASQUERADING AS

    DIABETIC RETINOPATHYThere are a range of common ocular andsystemic conditions that can mimic dia-betic retinopathy in patients with diabetes(136).

    1. Age-related macular degenerationAlthough many population-based studieshave shown that people with diabetes arenot at higher risk of age-related maculardegeneration (AMD) (137143), there aresimilarities between AMD and diabeticretinopathy. First, retinal signs (e.g.,

    hemorrhages and hard exudates) of neo-vascular or wet AMD are sometimesconfused with diabetic macular edema,particularly among older patients with di-abetes. Second, the key pathogenic pro-cess in neovascular AMD and proliferativeretinopathy is an increased expression of

    VEGFs. Chronic inflammation is also apossible common pathophysiologicmechanismof both conditions (144,145).

    Advanced glycation end products, for ex-ample, have been found in drusen, a typ-ical lesion of early-stage AMD (146).Third, there is now good evidence that

    anti-VEGF treatment is effective for bothneovascular AMD and proliferative reti-nopathy (147149).

    2. Hypertensive retinopathySigns of hypertensive retinopathy are fre-quently seen in adults over 40 years of ageand may include arteriosclerotic changes(arteriolar narrowing, arterio-venouscrossing changes, or arterio-venous nick-ing), arteriolar wall changes (copper/s i lve r wiring), c ot t on wool spot s,hemorrhages, or edema. Many patients

    with diabetes have hypertension, andsome of the more severe signs of hyper-tensive retinopathy are similar to diabeticretinopathy. Like diabetic retinopathy,the presence of hypertensive retinopathysignals widespread microvacular damageand predicts subsequent events of stroke,congestive heart failure, and cardiovascu-lar mortality, independently of traditionalrisk factors (150153). Early recognitionof the ocular effects of blood pressurecould allow physicians to better managepatients with hypertension and to moni-tor its end-organ effects (154).

    3. Radiation retinopathyRadiation retinopathy presents progres-sively degenerative and proliferative vas-cular changes, primarily affecting themacula, ranging from microaneurysm totelangiectasia, intraretinal hemorrhages,and neovascularization (155). Radiationretinopathy can have a delayed onset

    months to years after radiation treatment,and patients with diabetes and hyperten-sion are more susceptible to radiation ret-inopathy (156) due to intensifyingoxygen-derived free-radical assault on thevascular cells (155). Patients with mini-mal diabetic retinopathy undergoing che-motherapy may suffer vision loss fromradiation retinopathy resulting from low-dose radiation that is considered to be safeand properly fractionated (157). Since ra-diation retinopathy and diabetic retinop-a t h y a r e i d e n t i c a l c l i n i c a l l y a n d

    histopathologically, treatment for thiscondition has been based on establishedtherapy for diabetic retinopathy such aslaser photocoagulation (158).

    4. Other causes of retinopathyTypical diabetic retinopathy lesions suchas cotton wool spots, retinal microaneu-rysms, and retinal hemorrhage are alsoseen in eyes with branch RVO. Other sys-temic conditions that may resultin similarsigns include HIV/AIDS (159), variousconnective tissue diseases (Bechets dis-ease, temporal arteritis, systemic lupus

    vasculitis, sarcoidosis, sickle cell retinop-athy, and Wegeners granulomatosis),and retinal telangiectasias (Lebers miliaryaneurysm, Coats disease, and idiopathic

    juxtafoveal telangiectasia), a group ofrare, idiopathic, congenital retinal vas-cular anomalies affecting the retinalcapillaries.

    CONCLUSIONS A wide spectrumof ocular conditions other than diabeticretinopathy is associated with diabetes.Some of these conditions appear to be

    causally linked to hyperglycemia and di-abetes (e.g., cataract), whereas diabetesmay be only one of many risk factors forother conditions (e.g., RVO and retinalarteriolar emboli). In addition, there are arange of retinal conditions (e.g., hyper-tensive and radiation retinopathy) thatmimic common diabetic retinopathysigns.

    The management of diabetes-relatedeye diseases is primarily preventative, andregular eye examinations and appropriateophthalmology referral remains the keystrategy to reduce the impact of diabetes-

    Ocular associations of diabetes

    1908 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, NUMBER 9, SEPTEMBER 2008

  • 7/27/2019 1905.full

    5/8

    related vision loss. In many instances, vi-sion loss associated with most of theconditions discussed is gradual. Occa-sionally, however, more urgent referral toan ophthalmologist is needed, as acutesurgical or laser intervention can save apatients vision. While clinical trials havedemonstrated that good glycemic control

    reduces the incidence and progression ofdiabetic retinopathy (3), it is unclearwhether the same beneficial effect appliesto other diabetes-related ocular condi-tions (160). It is also unclear whethercontrolling for relevant risk factors (e.g.,blood pressure and lipids) can alter thecourse of these ocular conditions.

    References1. Congdon NG, Friedman DS, Lietman T:

    Important causes of visual impairment in

    the world today. JAMA 290:20572060,20032. Kempen JH, et al: The prevalence of di-

    abetic retinopathy among adults in theUnited States.Arch Ophthalmol 122:552-563, 2004

    3. Mohamed Q, Gillies MC, Wong TY:Management of diabetic retinopathy: asystematic review. JAMA 298:902916,2007

    4. Cavallerano JD: A review of non-retinalocular complications of diabetes melli-tus.J Am Optom Assoc 61:533543, 1990

    5. American Optometric Association: Opto-metric Clinical Practice Guideline: Care of

    the Patient with Diabetes Mellitus [articleonline]. Available from http://www.aoa.org/documents/CPG-3.pdf. Accessed 25January 2008

    6. StangaPE, Boyd SR, HamiltonAM: Ocularmanifestations of diabetes mellitus. CurrOpin Ophthalmol 10:483489, 1999

    7. Rowe NG, et al: Diabetes, fasting bloodglucose and age-related cataract: theBlue Mountains Eye Study. OphthalmicEpidemiol 7:103114, 2000

    8. Hiller R, Sperduto RD, EdererF: Epidemi-ologic associations with nuclear, cortical,and posterior subcapsular cataracts. Am JEpidemiol 124:916925, 1986

    9. Miglior S, et al: Risk factors for cortical,nuclear, posterior subcapsular and mixedcataract: a case-control study. OphthalmicEpidemiol 1:93105, 1994

    10. Delcourt C, et al:Risk factorsfor cortical,nuclear, and posterior subcapsular cata-racts: the POLA study: Pathologies Ocu-laires Liees a lAge. Am J Epidemiol 151:497504, 2000

    11. Klein BE, et al: Older-onset diabetes andlens opacities: the Beaver Dam EyeStudy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2:4955,2005

    12. Saxena S, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E: Five-year incidence of cataract in older per-

    sons with diabetes and pre-diabetes.Ophthalmic Epidemiol 11:271277, 2004

    13. McCarty CA, et al: Risk factors for age-related maculopathy: the Visual Impair-ment Project.Arch Ophthalmol 119:14551462, 2001

    14. Mukesh BN, et al: Development of cata-ract and associated risk factors: the VisualImpairmentProject.Arch Ophthalmol 124:

    7985, 200615. Leske MC, Chylack LT Jr, Wu SY: The

    Lens Opacities Case-Control Study: riskfactors for cataract. Arch Ophthalmol109:244251, 1991

    16. Hennis A, et al: Risk factors for incidentcortical and posterior subcapsular lensopacities in the Barbados Eye Studies.Arch Ophthalmol 122:525530, 2004

    17. Foster PJ, et al: Risk factors for nuclear,cortical and posterior subcapsular cata-racts in the Chinese population of Singa-pore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Br JOphthalmol 87:11121120, 2003

    18. Tsai SY, et al: Epidemiologic study ofage-related cataracts among an elderlyChinese population in Shih-Pai, Taiwan.Ophthalmology 110:10891095, 2003

    19. Nirmalan PK, et al: Risk factors for agerelated cataract in a rural population ofsouthern India: the Aravind Compre-hensive Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 88:989994, 2004

    20. Leske MC, et al: Diabetes, hypertension,and central obesity as cataract risk fac-tors in a black population: the BarbadosEye Study. Ophthalmology 106:3541,1999

    21. Harding JJ, et al: Diabetes, glaucoma,

    sex, and cataract: analysis of combineddata from two case control studies. Br JOphthalmol 77:2 6, 1993

    22. Bron AJ, et al: The lens in diabetes. Eye7:260275, 1993

    23. Klein BE, Klein R, Lee KE: Diabetes, car-diovascular disease, selected cardiovas-cular disease risk factors, and the 5-yearincidence of age-related cataract andprogression of lens opacities: the BeaverDam Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 126:782790, 1998

    24. Kato S, et al: Glycemic control and lenstransparency in patients withtype 1 diabe-tes mellitus. Am J Ophthalmol 131:301-

    304, 200125. Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE: Incidence of

    cataract surgery in the Wisconsin Epide-miologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy.Am J Ophthalmol 119:295300, 1995

    26. Negahban K, Chern K: Cataracts associ-ated with systemic disorders and syn-dromes. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 13:419-422, 2002

    27. Pirie A: Epidemiological and biochemicalstudies of cataract and diabetes. InvestOphthalmol 4:629 637, 1965

    28. Murtha T, Cavallerano J: The manage-ment of diabetic eye disease in the set-ting of cataract surgery. Curr Opin

    Ophthalmol 18:1318, 200729. Hykin PG, et al: Extracapsular cataract

    extraction in proliferative diabetic reti-nopathy. Ophthalmology 100:394399,1993

    30. Chew EY, et al: Results after lens extrac-tion in patients with diabetic retinopa-thy: early treatment diabetic retinopathystudy report number 25. Arch Ophthal-

    mol 117:16001606, 199931. Cohen SM, et al: Endopthalmitis after

    pars plana vitrectomy: the Postvitrec-tomy Endopthalmitis Study. Opthalmol-ogy 102:705712, 1995

    32. Kattan HM, et al: Nosocomial en-dopthalmitis survey: current injcidenceof infection after intreocular surgery.Ophthalmology 98:227238, 1991

    33. Montan PG, et al: Endopthalmitis aftercataract surgery: risk factors relating totechnique and events of the operationand patient history. Ophthalmology 105:21712177, 1998

    34. Scott IU, Flynn HWJ, Feuer W: En-dopthalmitis after secondary intraocularlens implantation: a case-control study.Ophthalmology 102:19251931, 1995

    35. Doft BH, et al. : Diabetes and postcata-ract extraction endopthalmitis. CurrOpin Opthalmol 13:147151, 2002

    36. Characteristics of patients with nonar-teritic anterior ischemic optic neuropa-thy eligible for the Ischemic OpticNeuropathy Decompression Trial. ArchOphthalmol 114:13661374, 1996

    37. Flammer J, et al: The impact of ocularblood flow in glaucoma. Prog Ret Eye Res21:359393, 2002

    38. Piltz-Seymour JR, et al: Optic nerveblood flow is diminished in eyes of pri-mary open-angle glaucoma suspects.Am J Ophthalmol 132:6369, 2001

    39. Hayreh SS, et al: Nonarteritic anteriorischemic optic neuropathy: role of noc-turnal arterial hypotension. Arch Oph-thalmol 115:942945, 1997

    40. Arnold AC: Pathogenesis of nonarteriticanterior ischemic optic neuropathy.J Neuroophthalmol 23:157163, 2003

    41. Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, ZimmermanB: Ipsilateral recurrence of nonarteriticanterior ischemic optic neuropathy.Am J Ophthalmol 132:734742, 2001

    42. Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decom-pression Trial: twenty-four-month up-date. Arch Ophthalmol 118:793798,2000

    43. Optic nerve decompression surgery fornonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neu-ropathy (NAION) is not effective andmay be harmful: the Ischemic OpticNeuropathy Decompression Trial Re-search Group. JAMA 273:625632,1995

    44. Yoles E, Wheeler LA, Schwartz M: Al-pha2-adrenoreceptor agonists are neu-roprotective in a rat model of optic nervedegeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    Jeganathan and Associates

    DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, NUMBER 9, SEPTEMBER 2008 1909

  • 7/27/2019 1905.full

    6/8

    40:6573, 199945. Kupersmith MJ, et al: Aspirin reduces

    the incidence of second eye NAION: aretrospective study. J Neuroophthalmol17:250253, 1997

    46. Barr CC, Glaser JS, Blankenship G:Acute disc swelling in juvenile diabetes:clinical profile and natural history of 12cases. Arch Ophthalmol 98:21852192,

    198047. Bandello F, Menchini F: Diabetic papil-

    lopathy as a risk factor for progression ofdiabetic retinopathy. Retina 24:183184,2004

    48. Sato T, et al: Development of bilateral,nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neu-ropathy in an eye with diabetic papil-lopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 48:158162,2004

    49. Hayreh SS, Zahoruk RM: Anterior isch-emic optic neuropathy. VI. In juvenilediabetics. Ophthalmologica 182:1328,1981

    50. Friedrich Y, et al: Diabetic papillopathywith macular star mimicking clinicallysignificant diabetic macular edema. Ret-ina 21:8082, 2001

    51. Pavan PR, et al: Optic disc edema in ju-venile-onset diabetes. Arch Ophthalmol98:21935219, 1980

    52. Al-Haddad CE, Jurdi FA, Bashshur ZF :Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide forthe management of diabetic papillopa-thy. Am J Ophthalmol 137:11511153,2004

    53. Eshbaugh CG, et al : Simultaneous, mul-tiple cranial neuropathies in diabetes mel-litus. J Neuroophthalmol 15:219224,

    199554. Singh NP, et al: Multiple cranial nervepalsies associated with type 2 diabetesmellitus. Singapore Med J 47:712715,2006

    55. Rush JA: Extraocular muscle palsies indiabetes mellitus. Int OphthalmolClin 24:155159, 1984

    56. Watanabe K, et al: Characteristics of cra-nial nerve palsies in diabetic patients.Diabetes Res Clin Pract 10:1927, 1990

    57. Patel SV, et al: Diabetes and hyperten-sion in isolated sixth nerve palsy: a pop-ulation-based study. Ophthalmology 112:760763, 2005

    58. Burde RM: Neuro-ophthalmic associa-tions and complications of diabetes mel-litus. Am J Ophthalmol 114:498501,1992

    59. Kahn HA, Milton RC: Revised Framing-ham Eye Study prevalence of glaucomaand diabetic retinopathy. Am J Epidemiol111:769776, 1980

    60. Dielemans I, et al: Primary open-angleglaucoma, intraocular pressure, and di-abetes mellitus in the general elderlypopulation: the Rotterdam Study. Oph-thalmology 103:12711275, 1996

    61. Mitchell P, et al: Open-angle glaucomaand diabetes: the Blue Mountains eye

    study, Australia. Ophthalmology 104:712718, 1997

    62. Hennis A, et al: Hypertension, diabetes,and longitudinal changes in intraocularpressure. Ophthalmology 110:908914,2003

    63. Lin HY, et al: Intraocular pressure mea-sured with a noncontact tonometer in anelderly Chinese population: the Shihpai

    Eye Study.Arch Ophthalmol 123:381-638,2005

    64. Bernth-Petersen P, Bach E: Epidemio-logic aspects of cataract surgery. III. Fre-quencies of diabetes and glaucoma in acataract population. Acta Ophthalmol(Copenh) 61:406 416, 1983

    65. Katz J, Sommer A: Risk factors for pri-mary open angle glaucoma. Am J PrevMed 4:110114, 1988

    66. Reynolds DC: Relative risk factors inchronic open-angle glaucoma: an epide-miological study.Am J Optom Physiol Opt54:116120, 1977

    67. Morgan RW, Drance SM: Chronic open-angle glaucoma and ocular hyperten-sion: an epidemiological study. Br JOphthalmol 59:211215, 1975

    68. Wilson MR,et al: A case-control study ofrisk factors in open angle glaucoma.ArchOphthalmol 105:10661071, 1987

    69. Tielsch JM, et al: Diabetes, intraocularpressure, and primary open-angle glau-coma in the Baltimore Eye Survey. Oph-thalmology 102:4853, 1995

    70. Vijaya L, et al: Prevalence of open-angleglaucoma in a rural south Indian popu-lation. InvestOphthalmol Vis Sci 46:4461-1167, 2005

    71. Kahn HA, Milton RC: Alternative defini-tions of open-angle glaucoma: effect onprevalence and associations in the Fra-mingham eye study. Arch Ophthalmol98:21722177, 1980

    72. Bengtsson B: The prevalence of glau-coma. Br J Ophthalmol 65:4649, 1981

    73. Armaly MF, et al: Biostatistical analysisof the collaborative glaucoma study. I.Summary report of the risk factors forglaucomatous visual-field defects. ArchOphthalmol 98:21632171, 1980

    74. Grunwald JE, et al: Retinal autoregula-tion in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthal-mology 91:16901694, 1984

    75. Nakamura M, Kanamori A, Negi A: Dia-betesmellitusas a risk factorforglaucoma-tous optic neuropathy. Ophthalmologica219:110, 2005

    76. Jacobson DR, Murphy RP, RosenthalAR: The treatment of angle neovascu-larization with panretinal photocoagu-lation. Ophthalmology 86:12701277,1979

    77. Zeiter JH, Shin DH, Baek NH: Visualfield defects in diabetic patients with pri-mary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Oph-thalmol 111:581584, 1991

    78. Mapstone R, Clark CV: Prevalence of di-abetesin glaucoma. BrMedJ(ClinResEd)

    291:9395, 198579. Mapstone R, Clark CV: The prevalence

    of autonomic neuropathy in glaucoma.Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK104:265109,1985

    80. Clark CV: Autonomic denervation hy-persensitivity in the primary glaucomas.Eye 3:349354, 1989

    81. Schertzer RM, Wang D, Bartholomew

    LR: Diabetes mellitus and glaucoma. IntOphthalmol Clin 38:6987, 1998

    82. Madsen PH: Experiences in surgicaltreatment of haemorrhagic glaucoma: afollow-up study. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl120:8891, 1973

    83. Brown GC,et al : Neovascular glaucoma:etiologic considerations. Ophthalmol-ogy 91:315320, 1984

    84. Loffler KU: [Neovascular glaucoma: ae-tiology, pathogenesis and treatment].Ophthalmologe 103:10571063, 2006[Article in German]

    85. Hohl RD, Barnett DM: Diabetic hemor-rhagic glaucoma. Diabetes 19:944947,1970

    86. Zirm M: Protein glaucomaovertaxingof flow mechanisms? Preliminary report.Ophthalmologica 184:155161, 1982

    87. Sivak-Callcott JA, et al: Evidence-basedrecommendations for the diagnosis andtreatment of neovascular glaucoma.Ophthalmology 108:17671776, 2001

    88. Chen CS, Miller NR: Ocular ischemicsyndrome: review of clinical presenta-tions, etiology, investigation, and man-agement. Compr Ophthalmol Update8:1728, 2007

    89. Mizener JB, Podhajsky P, Hayreh SS:

    Ocular ischemic syndrome. Ophthal-mology 104:859864, 199790. Ino-ue M, et al: Ocular ischemic syn-

    dromein diabetic patients.Jpn J Ophthal-mol 43:3135, 1999

    91. Sivalingam A, et al: The ocular ischemicsyndrome. II. Mortality and systemicmorbidity. Int Ophthalmol 13:187191,1989

    92. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterec-tomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North AmericanSymptomatic Carotid EndarterectomyTrial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 325:445453, 1991

    93. Kawaguchi S, et al: Effect of carotidendarterectomy on chronic ocularischemic syndrome due to internal ca-rotid artery stenosis. Neurosurgery 48:328332, 2001

    94. Kawaguchi S, et al: Effect of carotid ar-tery stenting on ocular circulation andchronic ocular ischemic syndrome. Ce-rebrovasc Dis 22:402408, 2006

    95. Green WR, et al: Central retinal vein oc-clusion: a prospective histopathologicstudy of29 eyes in28 cases. Retina 1:2755, 1981

    96. Christoffersen NL, Larsen M: Patho-physiology and hemodynamics of

    Ocular associations of diabetes

    1910 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, NUMBER 9, SEPTEMBER 2008

  • 7/27/2019 1905.full

    7/8

    branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthal-mology 106:20542062, 1999

    97. Mohamed Q, et al: Interventions for cen-tral retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based systematic review. Ophthalmology114:507519, 2007

    98. Shahsuvaryan ML, Melkonyan AK: Cen-tral retinal vein occlusion risk profile: acase-control study. Eur J Ophthalmol 13:

    445452, 200399. Sperduto RD, et al: Risk factors for

    hemiretinal vein occlusion: comparisonwith risk factors for central and branchretinal vein occlusion: the eye diseasecase-control study. Ophthalmology 105:765771, 1998

    100. Rath EZ, et al: Risk factors for retinalvein occlusions: a case-control study.Ophthalmology 99:509514, 1992

    101. Mitchell P, W. Smith, Chang A: Preva-lence and associations of retinal vein oc-clusion in Australia: the Blue MountainsEye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 114:12431247, 1996

    102. Hayreh SS, et al: Systemic diseases asso-ciated with various types of retinal veinocclusion. Am J Ophthalmol 131:6177,2001

    103. Klein R, et al: The epidemiology of reti-nal vein occlusion: the Beaver Dam EyeStudy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 98:133141, 2000

    104. The Eye Disease Case-Control StudyGroup: Risk factors for central retinalvein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 114:545554, 1996

    105. Wong TY, et al: Cardiovascular riskfactors for retinal vein occlusion and

    arteriolar emboli: the AtherosclerosisRisk in Communities and Cardiovas-cular Health studies. Ophthalmology112:540 547, 2005

    106. Pinna A, et al: Glucose-6-phosphate de-hydrogenase deficiency in retinal veinocclusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:27472752, 2007

    107. Natural history and clinical manage-ment of central retinal vein occlusion:the Central Vein OcclusionStudyGroup.Arch Ophthalmol 115:486491, 1997

    108. West JA, et al: Panretinal photocoagula-tion during cataract extraction in eyeswith active proliferative diabetic eye dis-

    ease. Eye 13:170173, 1999109. Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagu-

    lation for macular edema in central veinocclusion: the Central Vein OcclusionStudy Group M report. Ophthalmology102:14251433, 1995

    110. Hirano Y, et al: Comparative study onefficacy of a combination therapy of tri-amcinolone acetonide administrationwith and without vitrectomy formacularedema associated with branch retinalvein occlusion. Ophthalmic Res 39:207212, 2007

    111. Margolis R, Singh RP, Kaiser PK: Branchretinal vein occlusion: clinical findings,

    natural history, and management. ComprOphthalmol Update 7:265276, 2006

    112. Manuchehri K, Kirkby G: Vitreoushaemorrhage in elderly patients: man-agement and prevention. Drugs Aging20:655661, 2003

    113. Hawkins WR: Venous occlusive diseasereview (Letter). Retina 27:514, 2007

    114. Funderburk RL, Feinberg EB: Diabetes

    as a risk factorfor retinal neovasculariza-tion in retinal vein occlusion. Ann Oph-thalmol 21:6566, 1989

    115. Cugati S, et al: Retinal vein occlusionand vascular mortality:pooled data anal-ysis of 2 population-based cohorts. Oph-thalmology 114:520524, 2007

    116. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, PodhajskyP: Incidence of various types of retinalvein occlusion and their recurrence anddemographic characteristics. Am J Oph-thalmol 117:429 441, 1994

    117. Lord RS: Transient monocular blind-ness.Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 18:299305,1990

    118. Klein R, et al: Retinal emboli and stroke:the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Oph-thalmol 117:10631068, 1999

    119. Bruno A, et al: Vascular outcome in menwith asymptomatic retinal cholesterolemboli: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med122:249253, 1995

    120. Klein R, et alL Retinal emboli and cardio-vascular disease: the Beaver Dam EyeStudy. Arch Ophthalmol 121:1446-14451,2003

    121. Wang JJ, et al: Retinal arteriolar emboliand long-term mortality: pooled dataanalysis from two older populations.

    Stroke 37:18331836, 2006122. Breen LA: Atherosclerotic carotid dis-ease and the eye. Neurol Clin 9:131145,1991

    123. Recchia FM, Brown GC: Systemic dis-orders associated with retinal vascularocclusion. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 11:462467, 2000

    124. Hondeghem K, Blanckaert M, Blanck-aert J: Branch retinal artery occlusion insystemic diseases: a case report. Bull SocBelge Ophtalmol 271:915, 1999

    125. Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE: Intraocularpressure in diabetic persons. Ophthal-mology 91:135613560, 1984

    126. Beatty S, Au Eong KG: Acute occlusionof the retinal arteries: current conceptsand recent advances in diagnosis andmanagement. J Accid Emerg Med17:324329, 2000

    127. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman B, Kardon RH:Visual improvement with corticosteroidtherapy in giant cell arteritis: report of alarge study and review of literature. ActaOphthalmol Scand 80:355367, 2002

    128. Yuzurihara D, Iijima H: Visual outcomein central retinal and branch retinal ar-tery occlusion.Jpn J Ophthalmol 48:490492, 2004

    129. Fujishima H, Tsubota K: Improvement of

    corneal fluorescein staining in post cata-ract surgery of diabetic patients by an oralaldose reductase inhibitor, ONO-2235.Br J Ophthalmol 86:860863, 2002

    130. Hiraoka M, et al: Factors contributing tocorneal complications after vitrectomyin diabetic patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 45:492495, 2001

    131. Brightbill FS, Myers FL, Bresnick GH:

    Postvitrectomy keratopathy. Am J Oph-thalmol 85:651655, 1978

    132. Tabatabay CA, et al: Reduced number ofhemidesmosomes in the corneal epithe-lium of diabetics with proliferative vit-reoretinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin ExpOphthalmol 226:389392, 1988

    133. Friedman EA: Advanced glycosylatedend products and hyperglycemia in thepathogenesis of diabetic complications.Diabetes Care 22 (Suppl. 2):B65B71,1999

    134. Didenko TN, et al: [Clinical and patho-genetic features of neurotrophic cornealdisorders in diabetes]. Vestn Oftalmol115:711, 1999 [Article in Russian]

    135. Tavakoli M, et al: Corneal sensitivity isreduced and relates to the severity ofneuropathy in patients with diabetes.Diabetes Care 30:18951897, 2007

    136. Venkatramani J, Mitchell P: Ocular andsystemic causes of retinopathy in pa-tients without diabetes mellitus. BMJ328:625629, 2004

    137. Vidaurri JS, et al: Association betweendrusen and some of the risk factors forcoronary artery disease. Ophthalmologica188:243247, 1984

    138. Algvere P, et al: Retinal microangiopathy

    and pigment epithelial lesions in sub-jects with normal, borderline, and de-creased oral glucose tolerance. Br JOphthalmol 69:416 419, 1985

    139. Kahn HA, et al: The Framingham EyeStudy. I. Outline and major prevalencefindings. Am J Epidemiol 106:1732,1977

    140. Hyman LG, et al: Senile macular degen-eration: a case-control study. Am J Epi-demiol 118:213227, 1983

    141. Blumenkranz MS, et al: Risk factors inage-related maculopathy complicatedby choroidal neovascularization. Oph-thalmology 93:552558, 1986

    142. Maltzman BA, Mulvihill MN, Green-baum A: Senile macular degenerationand risk factors: a case-control study.Ann Ophthalmol 11:11971201, 1979

    143. Voutilainen-Kaunisto RM, et al: Age-re-lated macular degeneration in newly diag-nosed type 2 diabetic patients and controlsubjects: a 10-year follow-up on evolu-tion, risk factors, and prognostic signifi-cance. DiabetesCare23:16721678, 2000

    144. Hageman GS, et al: An integrated hypoth-esisthat considersdrusenas biomarkers ofimmune-mediated processes at the RPE-Bruchs membrane interface in aging andage-relatedmaculardegeneration. ProgRe-

    Jeganathan and Associates

    DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, NUMBER 9, SEPTEMBER 2008 1911

  • 7/27/2019 1905.full

    8/8

    tin Eye Res 20:705732, 2001145. Seddon JM, et al: Association between

    C-reactive protein and age-related mac-ular degeneration. JAMA 291:704710,2004

    146. Hammer M, et al: Ocular fundus auto-fluorescence observations at differentwavelengths in patients with age-relatedmacular degeneration and diabetic reti-

    nopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthal-mol 246:105114, 2008

    147. Wong TY, G. Liew, Mitchell P: Clinicalupdate: new treatments for age-relatedmacular degeneration. Lancet 370:204206, 2007

    148. Rosenfeld PJ, et al: Ranibizumab forneovascular age-related macular de-generation. N Engl J Med 355:14191431, 2006

    149. Gragoudas ES, et al: Pegaptanib forneovascular age-related macular de-

    generation. N Engl J Med 351:28052816, 2004

    150. Wong TY, et al: Retinopathy and risk ofcongestive heart failure. JAMA 293:6369, 2005

    151. Wong TY, Mitchell P: Hypertensive ret-inopathy signs are independent predic-tors of cardiovascular diseases (Letter).Br Med J331:73, 2005

    152. Wong TY, et al: Retinal microvascularabnormalities and incident stroke: theAtherosclerosis Risk in CommunitiesStudy. Lancet 358:11341140, 2001

    153. Wong TY, et al: Retinal arteriolar nar-rowing and risk of coronary heart dis-ease in men and women: theAtherosclerosis Risk in CommunitiesStudy. JAMA 287:11531159, 2002

    154. Wong TY, Mitchell P: Hypertensive ret-inopathy. N Engl J Med 351:23102317,2004

    155. Archer DB, Gardiner TA: Ionizing radi-ation and the retina. Curr Opin Ophthal-mol 5:5965, 1994

    156. Gupta A, et al: Radiation retinopathy:case report and review (Letter). BMCOphthalmol 7:6, 2007

    157. Viebahn M, Barricks ME, Osterloh MD:Synergism between diabetic and radia-

    tion retinopathy: case report and review.Br J Ophthalmol 75:629 632, 1991158. Graham CE, et al: Laser photocoagula-

    tion: ocular research and therapy in dia-betic retinopathy. Adv Exp Med Biol 572:195200, 2006

    159. Kramer M, Lynn W, Lightman S: HIV/AIDS and the eye. Hosp Med 64:421424,2003

    160. Hoerle S, Kroll P: Evidence-based ther-apy of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmo-logica 221:132141, 2007

    Ocular associations of diabetes

    1912 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 31, NUMBER 9, SEPTEMBER 2008