19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event

28
19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event Ron W. Przybylinski, James E. Sieveking, Benjamin D. Sipprell NOAA / National Weather Service St. Louis Jared L. Guyer NOAA/NWS/NCEP Storm Prediction Center 2009 Spring Media Workshop

description

19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event. Ron W. Przybylinski, James E. Sieveking, Benjamin D. Sipprell NOAA / National Weather Service St. Louis Jared L. Guyer NOAA/NWS/NCEP Storm Prediction Center. 2009 Spring Media Workshop. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and Lessons Learned from this Event

Page 1: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

19 July 2006 Derecho:A Meteorological Perspective and

Lessons Learned from this Event

Ron W. Przybylinski, James E. Sieveking, Benjamin D. Sipprell

NOAA / National Weather Service St. Louis

Jared L. GuyerNOAA/NWS/NCEP Storm Prediction Center

2009 Spring Media Workshop

Page 2: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Outline of this Presentation

• Synoptic scale conditions the morning of 19 July 2006

• Storm overview (large scale perspective) • Mesoscale Environment during the afternoon of

19 July 2006 over southern Iowa, Missouri and Illinois.

• WSR-88D Doppler radar analysis of the storm complex from WFO Lincoln Illinois and WFO St. Louis perspectives.

• Some final comments

Page 3: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Upper Air Analysis - 1200 UTC 19 July 2006

250 mb analysis 500 mb analysis

Page 4: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Upper Air Analysis - 1200 UTC 19 July 2006

850 mb analysis RUC 700-500 mb lapse rate (°C km-1)

Page 5: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

1200 UTC DVN Observed Raob

MLCAPE MUCAPE 700-500 LR 0-6 km Shear 0-3 km Shear

1333 J kg-1 2855 J kg-1 7.4 °C km-1 14 m s-1 6 m s-1

Page 6: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Radar Imagery Composites and 06z SPC Outlook

Composite base reflectivity 1210 UTC

SPC radar animation1200-1315 UTC

Page 7: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Radar Imagery Composites and 13z SPC Outlook

Composite base reflectivity 1610 UTC

SPC radar animation1454-1615 UTC

Page 8: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Hourly MCS Track and Storm Reports

Page 9: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

1800 UTC Surface Analysis 19 July 2006

Page 10: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

RUC 00-hr Sounding for SPI at 2100 UTC

MLCAPE MUCAPE 700-500 LR 0-6 km Shear 0-3 km Shear

5392 J kg-1 6065 J kg-1 7.3 °C km-1 11 m s-1 8 m s-1

Page 11: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Winchester, IL (WNC) Profiler 1700 - 2200 UTC

17 18 19 20 21 22

Page 12: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

SPC Mesoscale analysis for MLCAPE and 0-6 km bulk shear at 2300 UTC

MLCAPE ranged from 2000 – 6000 J kg-1 acrosseastern Missouri through

west-central Illinois

Deep layer shear weak with magnitudes of

10 – 22 m s-1

Page 13: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

RUC 00-hr Sounding for STL at 2300 UTC

MLCAPE MUCAPE 700-500 LR 0-6 km Shear 0-3 km Shear

2882 J kg-1 2954 J kg-1 7.4 °C km-1 12 m s-1 6 m s-1

Page 14: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Parker’s Study on Linear MCS archetypes

The 19 July 2006 Damaging Wind Convective system followed theParallel Stratiform (PS) archetype

Page 15: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

WSR-88D Radar Imageryfrom Lincoln Illinois (KILX)at 2138 UTC

Parallel Stratiform Parker and Johnson 2000

Page 16: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Conceptual model of a multicell cluster storm complex.(NSSL)

Page 17: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

2332 UTC Radar imagery from St. Louis (KLSX). The strongest winds were associated with convective segment #3 (larger echo mass).

Several witnesses over southern Macoupin County experience hail up to nickel size with the stronger downbursts behind the leading gust front.

KLSX radar imagery for 2332 UTC

Page 18: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

7:01 PM CDT Reflectivity (left), Base velocity (right). The strongest winds were detected with the higher reflectivity cores over northwest Madison County Illinois.

I Was Here!I Was Here!

Page 19: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Loop of the evolution of a single severe cell over the western part of the storm complex.

Page 20: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

ASOS / AWOS Surface Observation sites around the GreaterSt. Louis metro area.

Bunker Hill

Page 21: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

When was the last time we documented a case similarto the July 19, 2006 Derecho?

Aug 10, 1992. The convective complex formed just southwest of KLSXand moved south-southward through west-central Arkansas. Widespread wind damage occurred with this derecho.

Page 22: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

The July 19 2006 damage map reveals that much of the downbursts was oriented from north-northeast to south-southwest – an unusual direction.This direction of damaging winds future intensified the degree of damage over the greater St. Louis metro area.

Page 23: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Tower Grove Park

Page 24: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event
Page 25: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event
Page 26: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

Summary - On 19 July 2006 formed over northeast Iowa and causedsevere wind damage from parts of northeast Iowa through central Illinois and then south-southwest across the Greater St. Louis metro area and then into southwest Missouri.(A typical movement).

- Over 500,000 people were without power from this windstorm. The oppressive HEAT AND HUMIDTY after this event brought suffering to a large part of the population.

- The environment over the Mid-Mississippi Valley regionwas extremely unstable with ML CAPEs of 2600 to 6000 J/Kg while a deep layer shear was weak (< 22 m s-1 )

Page 27: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

- RUC sounding at 2300 UTC from STL showed a very weak cap.

- The upper-level ridge over the central plains built eastwardinto Illinois allowing the MCS to move in a south-southwestdirection during the late afternoon and evening.

- The overall storm morphology took on the characteristics of “parallel stratiform” type system where three convective segments showed “pulse – multicellular” characteristics.

- Convective segment #3 (eastern most storm) was themost consistent storm complex of the three groups.

-

Page 28: 19 July 2006 Derecho: A Meteorological Perspective and  Lessons Learned from this Event

- Surface winds along the leading edge of the gustfront varied between 20 to 31 m s-1.

- The strongest surface winds were associated with the isolated convective towers through the area of mature convection. Wind speed estimates – 40 m s-1

- This wind storm was one of the more challenging cases, from both a national and local WFO perspective.