178-Allen Barker Mental firewall

8/2/2019 178-Allen Barker Mental firewall

1/20

freedom of thoughts, beliefs, opinions and expressions

Targeted Individuals Canada

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is part of Canadian Constitution that protects its citizens

from human rights violations.

Home

heroes

ti

cases

vids

links

dwnload

read

bks

picspod

archive

Tpe tet to search here...

Home > articles, blog post, news > Allen Barkers Mental Firewalls

Allen Barkers Mental Firewalls

August 20, 2011 HRC


2/20

This is the third of a three-part series of essays on mind control. As the earlier essays explained, mind

control is the term commonly and historically used to describe clandestine operations to alter human

behavior and thought. The series focuses mainly on high-technology techniques involving, for example,

surveillance devices and electromagnetic weapons though victims of all sorts of mind control

techniques have common experiences and sequelae. The first essay of the series, Motives for Mind

Control, dealt with some of the reasons that mind control harassment, torture, and exploitation happens

and why it continues. The second part, Resisting the Mind Control State, dealt with ways to protest

and resist mind control abuses in a supposedly free society. In this final part, I explore some of the

methods and techniques that victims have developed to help them resist these ongoing human rights

atrocities committed every day against their bodies and minds. In a sense we are going to have a look at

mind control torture from the torture victims point of view, from inside the mind of the victim.

This essay is written from the point of view of someone experiencing real torture from externally

induced mind control phenomena, including induced voices in the head, surveillance, harassment from

various sources, and nonlethal aversive jolts. While I make no secret of the fact that I have personally

been subjected to a similar sort of mind control torture, this is not my story. Of course it is influenced by

events I have experienced, but the essay is a composite from my interactions with many mind control

victims (and provocateurs) over the past few years. I will save the actual details of my own experiencesfor my lawyers or for prosecutors when that time comes, or perhaps for other writings I might choose to

make public. Thus, in keeping with the earlier parts of the series, you do not even have to believe me

about my having been tortured though it all happened. There are many people in the world, including

many American citizens, who have experienced very similar things. You can even think that all of those

people made it all up, and still have to be concerned despite your Holocaust denial. The technology

undoubtedly exists right now to carry out the sorts of torture operations described in this essay, and will

only become more advanced with time.

I cover a lot of different techniques and possibilities in this essay, but keep in mind that the truth is bad

enough. What we already know and can document is bad enough, and is only the tip of the iceberg. Inthe spirit of mentioning all the possibilities, though, let me briefly discuss mental illness here. There truly

are some people with mental illnesses which occur naturally. There are also people with mental illnesses

which were externally and purposely inflicted, for example by harassment operations. And there are

mind control victims who are completely normal except that they have undergone years and years of

some of the most hideous torture imaginable in a lying, despicable society that denies it, ignores it,

and further tortures the victims. We know this from documented sources what the government has

admitted is bad enough. I hope this essay will prove helpful even to victims who suffer from true mental

illness. I call them victims also because the cowardly U.S. government has hidden behind the skirts of

the mentally ill to commit some of the worst atrocities imaginable, and the truly mentally ill are

victimized by this as well. The mentally ill are also known to have been used as guinea pigs in mindcontrol experiments precisely because they would tend to be disbelieved and are relatively powerless

victims for torturers to experiment on. Some victims may have been poisoned by drugs engineered to

cause them psychological problems and I do not mean ordinary street drugs. Others have had

psychosurgery, microwave harassment, etc., which can cause organic problems in addition to

psychological problems. And of course, the mind is really not separate from the body and psychological

torture is just as bad as direct physical torture.

Most people are still free to think what they want to the extent that that still means anything and

some will try to second guess the victims and provide armchair diagnoses of the victims problems.

People who try to dismiss true torture victims as just mentally ill will receive and deserve the utmostcontempt from the victims and from those decent people who know what is really going on. And we

will remember. For the reasons described in Part II, the psychiatric and psychological communities

cannot be trusted, except for a few actual healers here and there.


3/20

Much of this essay contains a sort of analysis that it is fashionable among the pseudo-intelligentsia to

dismiss as just black-and-white thinking. These people have their sixth-grade epiphany that not

everything is black-and-white, and for the rest of their lives go around justifying anything convenient

with this amoral relativism. They never realize (or it just does not suit their lies) that while nothing is

black-and-white, some things are close enough that they might as well be. I will be writing about Nazi

pigs, and I mean this in the sense of Mengele the Nazi pig, not any other cultural pig association.

Those who dismiss this sort of thinking perhaps would think differently if they had ever experienced

real torture or were capable of the slightest bit of empathy. There is no doubt that this sort of thinking

has been misused and misapplied at various times, but I cannot worry about how every moron might

misunderstand or misapply what I write. People may well misapply things I have written here, or use

them to create some propaganda distraction from what I am actually writing about, but I am describing it

the way it is. If you dont call a Nazi a Nazi you end up with Nazism by some other name.

Every victim has had to develop his or her own method of coping with the torture. I am not trying to

impose my methods on anyone. A religious person under torture finds strength in his or her religion, so

some Zen Buddhist philosophy may necessarily be apparent in my writing. In the ignorant U.S. there

are still people who will blame a victim for being Buddhist, a major world religion. Of course Mengele

the pig tries to justify and rationalize his acts of torture in any and all ways possible. There are the usualmyriad ways of blaming and smearing the victims and rationalizing away the acts of the torturer.

I hope that this essay will help some victims. I know that I have benefited from the work of other victims

who had the courage to speak out about their experiences. Much of this essay deals with the mental

game of mind control, which is of course not a game at all to the torture victims. You can compare it

to having to face mock executions each day. There is also the physical intimidation many victims

experience. As a victim might put it, if it is all in my head then who harassed me on the highway? Why

did my mail all arrive opened? Why did my phone regularly ring twice a day with hang-up calls? Why

did many of my internet posts stop propagating anywhere? Why did a police car pull up beside mine

every time I talked about China, on the drive to my honeymoon? The unfortunate reality is that thevictims have to develop their own methods to deal with the constant, credible physical threats of death

or worse. I wish I could help there, but I do what I can. This is a barbaric and savage nation.

What is a Firewall? For the purposes of this essay, let me digress a bit here and describe the concept

of a firewall. A firewall, in the historical sense, is a wall built between connected buildings and

specifically constructed so that a fire in one unit of the structure will not spread to the other units. In a

more recent sense, a firewall is a device on a computer network that keeps nodes of the network

separated, for instance so that a hacker attack on one node of the network cannot spread to connected

nodes of the network.

For our purposes, we can consider all the computers on a network to be like houses on a street.

(Network engineers, please bear with me.) Each house has several doors into it, which correspond to

what are called ports on a networked computer. A computer actually has thousands of ports, but the

principle is illustrated by considering a house with several doors. All the houses have inhabitants in

them, who send out messengers to the other houses: But some houses send out the equivalent of

burglars also. When the inhabitants of one house want to communicate with the inhabitants of another,

they send a messenger to a particular door of the house they want to communicate with. The messenger

knocks on the door.

Now, the inhabitants of the house can either open the door and let the messenger in or ignore the knock.If they let the messenger in, they can restrict what he is allowed to do while in the house. The messenger

may, for example, pick up a piece of paper and carry it back to his house. This would correspond to a

file transfer over a network. If the inhabitants of the house accidentally leave a door open, though, a


4/20

messenger may be able to come in the house without permission and do whatever they like, again

without permission. (There are many doors because a messenger occupies a particular door the whole

time he is in the house.)

A firewall, in this analogy, would correspond to a complete facade built around a house (or group of

houses, to be picky). The actual house is not even visible from the street. The doors of the original house

are only visible to messengers if the inhabitants of the house build corresponding doors in the facade. To

enter the house in this scenario, a messenger would have to first knock at some visible door of the

facade, be allowed in, and then knock at and be allowed into the actual door of the house. In this way

the security of the house is greatly increased from unwanted intrusions. (And you can have a collection

of trusted houses inside the fort which are less protected from each other.)

The title of this essay, Mental Firewalls, comes from an article by Timothy L. Thomas which

appeared in the Army War College journal Parameters in Spring 1998. It was titled The Mind Has No

Firewalls. The Army has an often honorable tradition going back to the Revolutionary War, the

minutemen, and so forth. But it also has had and still has some treason in its ranks. This is just the

ground truth, the facts on the ground. An army that tortures the domestic population is an

occupation army. Treasonous Nazi pigs, in this real sense rather than some spin machine crap or some

pathological liars bullshit, must be dealt with accordingly. This holds for all branches of the military.

This holds for law enforcement as well. It holds for all intelligence agencies also. It holds even when

they pretend the torture devices dont exist. Even if the victim does not realize what is happening to

him or her, it is still torture. Informed consent must be truly informed. Torturing an American citizen is

at least as treasonous as selling the nations top secrets to a foreign power.

Thomas article was in fact entered into evidence as part of a lawsuit by Harlan Girard of the

International Committee for the Convention Against Offensive Microwave Weapons. The articles

central metaphor is that human beings are like the computers on a network, except that they do not have

the ability to control the information traffic entering and leaving them. Their ports, or doors, are wide

open. This sort of analogy was prevalent during the military information warfare buzzword phase, and

illustrates the sort of thinking that was going on at the time. [On a note of caution, not all of Thomas'

article should be taken literally whether purposefully or not there is some likely disinfo there.]

Deception Operations Against the Human Biocomputer What is it that corresponds to your

reality? What do you perceive, and how do you make your decisions? You receive information through

your eyes, ears, and other senses. You read the information from the writers you choose to read, and

listen to the speakers you have access to very often these days from TV, radio, or the internet. You

think to yourself, in your private inner voice. You visualize and imagine. In information warfare against

individuals all of these are thought of as nothing but information channels that can be blocked, censored,co-opted, faked, forged, impersonated, or otherwise controlled to manipulate an individual. If you can

control all the information an individual receives then you can control their whole perceived reality. Like

the hypnotized subject who does something which violates his ethics while being persuaded to imagine

he is doing something else entirely, the information warfare subject is acting in a fantasy world created

precisely to manipulate him to do what his controllers want. This is known as a deception operation.

Such complete control, as far as I know, is not yet possible, but the principles still hold for whatever

approximation can be achieved. And the principles have been put into practice. Of course information

warfare is a buzzword and most of it is just a take on the ages-old practices of propaganda, lying, and

manipulation. But a new buzzword generates funding, and perhaps more importantly serves to morallydistance the new clean practices from the dirty, filthy business of amorally manipulating human beings

like pawns, with complete disregard for unalienable human rights. What was new at the time of

information warfare was 1) the internet as a widespread societal force, and 2) the wider development of


5/20

neuroinfluencing and so-called nonlethal weapons that can directly influence peoples brains.

As medicine and technology develop ever more advanced prosthetic devices, people will increasingly

become cyborgs as is already happening. Because of this trend these issues will become increasingly

clear with time. That is, it will become increasingly common to have computer devices implanted in

ones body. If someone hacks into your home computer and steals or manipulates your data then a crime

has been committed and you should rightly be angry. But if someone hacks into your physical body,

brain, and mind the violation is incomparably greater.

The Basic Modern Mind Control Torture Operation In this section I will describe the basic torture

setup used against our hypothetical, composite mind control torture victim. The focus is on the effects

that the victim experiences, not necessarily the particular technology that is used to inflict it. Remember

in all of this that the torture any individual receives can vary. It will vary according to the torturers

motives and technology, but will also be tailored to the psychology of the victim. What might bother one

person would not bother another. The professional torturers will start according to how their torture

manuals say to go about torturing someone with your profile, but almost all torturers will refine the

torture to the individual if they can. As they learn what bothers you they can focus on that more and

more in their torture. As you read this, keep that in mind. These torturers are not any different from the

sort you might read about in Red Cross literature, who shock the genitals of victims, etc., except that

they have access to abuse the most advanced technology and hide behind an evil U.S. government

which sinks to the lowest common denominator of the torturers it protects.

First of all, the victim is under constant surveillance. The victim is harassed overtly and covertly, on the

street, on internet, etc. All forms of taunting and goading tend to occur. For example, there is a Marco

Polo type of can you catch me taunting. Any and all sorts of high-tech and low-tech harassment are

used. (Just because it is sophomoric or pathetic does not mean they will not do it. In fact, this increases

the likelihood that the victims will be ridiculed if they complain. Remember the shoe powder to make

Castros beard fall out?) The victim soon has to wonder about everything that breaks or goes wrong in

their lives. The harassers use their surveillance to see what troubles the victim is having and then try to

take credit for causing them. The torturers are often arrogant and even incompetent at their vile torture

jobs despite using the most advanced technology to commit treason.

The victim is purposely isolated. People close to them are threatened or deceptions are created to make

the victim suspect those closest to him or her. Deceptions are launched so victims will blame innocent

neighbors for the harassment. (Unfortunately, in the despicable circles of mind control torture, it

sometimes is a neighbor or even a close family member that truly is responsible. There might be an out-

of-control safe house next door, for example.)

The victim is zapped inside his or her home (or a deception operation is launched so the victim thinks

this is what is happening). Heart rhythm palpitations induced by remote technology can cause terror to

an individual inside his or her home.

The victims mind is under assault with voice projection, voice cloning. The Village Voice, in an article

from July 2001 titled Psycho Warfare, described an Air Force report uncovered by Nick Begich.

Quoting from the articlethe technology may be able to create high-fidelity speech in humans, raising

the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction. It may be possible to talk to selected

adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them. This is exactly what they do, and there

are several different technologies documented in the open literature which can achieve this. Some

victims may be test cases for such psychological harassment techniques, or the method may already be

perfected and in covert operational use. [They don't mention this in psych textbooks or in movies

about "schizophrenics," do they?]


6/20

Twenty-four hours a day, the victim is subjected to commands, ridicule, and distractions inside his or her

private mind. How would it feel if you heard a voice in your head asking, Can you hear this? as if

someone were calibrating a torture device? The brain wants to respond it was never meant to be

violated in these ways. Interrogation. What might bother you? Any secrets, etc., the pigs might tease out

and harass you with? Anything that would insult you they could focus on? Anything that might distract

you they could keep you distracted with?

Finally, the victims supposedly private, subvocalized thoughts are somehow read, or inferred and

analyzed. There are various levels at which this can occur, from remote heartbeat and eye gaze analysis

all the way up to brain implants telemetering EEG signals. Not all victims report this level of

surveillance, and certainly just the other harassment techniques mentioned above result in a grotesque

human rights abuse. But many victims discover that even their supposedly private thoughts are being

violated and manipulated.

Living with Constant Harassment How do you deal with ordinary social interactions with the

pigs harassing you constantly in your mind? Do you act ethically and warn everyone you interact with

that their privacy is also being invaded, by way of you, against your consent? People you interact with

either believe you or they dont, but either way the social dynamic is completely changed. The pigs

invade the privacy of everyone around you, by using you, even that of your spouse and children. They

may also impersonate anyone you see, in your mind, to make it seem as if that person is the one

contacting you. They try to make it seem like everyone can hear your private thoughts, that you are

broadcasting to everyone. (Of course some victims might actually be doing that if they can read your

thoughts they could then broadcast them wide-field or local-field)

What sort of career are you allowed to have in a system where your intellectual property is stolen the

minute you think it up and where you have to cope with both regular harassment as well as

harassment in your mind? All this is in addition to the ordinary stresses of the job and not to mention

that some jobs require actual mental concentration. How sociable are long-term harassment victims with

serious cases of Ongoing Traumatic Stress Disorder? In American society there are also plenty of

vicious jerks who, while not Nazis or torturers, are quick to sense perceived weaknesses in people and

home in on them. The Nazis can often just wound a person and then throw him or her to the sharks,

bleeding.

It is natural for humans to think about other people. It is even natural to run a mental simulacrum process

to imagine and empathize with other people. Monkey see, monkey do, air guitar, I was just thinking of

you etc. The rapist pigs try to turn this against the human beings they torture. Sex is also a natural

process, as is farting, masturbation, defecation, burping, spats with people, fantasy, and so forth. The

rapist torturers try to turn this against their victims. They constantly attempt to demean their victims.Worrying and anxiety are also normal human emotions. The torturers, though, try to turn all of these

human properties against their victims.

One technique the Nazi pigs use is to try to reinforce anything you might worry about or feel anxious

about. It is like taking a dynamical system and driving it at its natural frequency in order to purposely

destroy it. Of course this is not to say the idiots know anything about dynamical systems. If you ever

read Lord of the Flies in junior high school you know about the level that these pig idiots operate at, but

when they rape your brain to inflict such ridicule and hatefulness it sets up positive feedback processes

in the brain that constitute torture. (If I am teaching these idiots anything by this, then you had better

watch out because they have already tortured me.) They will purposely injure you and then pick at yourscabs if you start to heal.

This process also happens because you know damn well you are under surveillance and the pig ridicule


7/20

squad is there to taunt you. Try not thinking about something you are conditioned with cattle prods

into knowing will result in harassment. You know the torturers will zap you that is why they goad

you with triggers at times but it is like not thinking of a pink elephant on command. Yins produce

yangs, so to speak. Transcending the yins and yangs is hard enough without the torture.

The torturers treat your personal, private, internal speech as if it were your public speech. They try to

subject you to all the ignorance and political correctness and everything else that someone at a podium

in a public place might be subjected to. The sadist nanny state is not just concerned with what you say in

your own home, they want to regulate what you think inside your head also. That can really cause your

moron anticipator thought pattern to distract from your normal private thinking, because you cannot

even think your private thoughts without knowing they will be reviewed for you by rapist morons.

The Possibility of Magician-Like Illusions to Deceive Victims The technology for thought

inference does exist, but it is important to keep in mind the ways in which magician-like deception

operations can be applied to a person to make it seem to them that their mind is being read. While some

victims thoughts are read, all of these techniques have likely been tested on nonconsenting American

citizens. The classic example is where the magician first subliminally inserts a thought into a victims

brain and then later the magician reveals what the person was thinking. By waving his hands and

strongly suggesting to the victim that his thoughts are being read, the victim sees the phony evidence

and tends to believe that is what is happening. The outrage, indignation, and terror responses the victim

is feeling will also tend to interfere with his or her reasoning processes. Advanced profiling and

prediction, based on standard surveillance techniques, is another possible means for deceiving a person

into thinking their mind is being read. While some victims have undoubtedly had such deceptions

inflicted on them, the black budget torturers before they will admit the true extent of technological

advancement will likely try to claim this is what was done in all cases. Purposefully setting up the

illusion of mind reading on a victim, though, is every bit as despicable and criminal as actually doing it.

The setup for the elementary example above can be carried out with only a basic voice-to-skull

projection device with the victim in range for some period of time. Suppose you wanted the victim to

think about blue violets, for example. You could beam at the victim very quiet suggestions of blue

violet. You could send them a song that they thought just got stuck in their heads. You could use voice

cloning technology and try to fake their own voice in their head. Another technique is to transmit a word

or phrase that is closely associated with what you want the victim to think about or do, and let their

brains associative memory do the rest. Now, after the subliminal send, the tension and drama build until

the sadist magician culminates this particular deception operation against the mark (a.k.a. human being).

The magician sends an email to, say, a public mailing list the victim is known to read. In the text of the

message the magician works in the phrase blue violet perhaps combined with a subtle threat.

Multiple Victims, Multiple Perpetrators The above example is only the most elementary, of course.

What if two victims were interacting, how could a pair of them be manipulated? The variations include

two nonconsensual victims, or a consensual harasser messing with a nonconsensual victim. There are

also witting and unwitting victims some have figured out parts of what is going on (intended or not)

while others have not. Some have been purposely duped into misinterpreting what is going on they

may think they are psychic, for example. What about wide-field projection devices? If two interacting

people are given the same subliminal stimuli, how might they interpret it? If you werent paying close

attention, would you know if you were the sender or the receiver? Especially if the manipulation

continued for a long period without your awareness, perhaps even from childhood. When PTSD is

purposely induced, the victim is that much more susceptible. Then you can consider the case wherethere are far more than two victims interacting: a society of would-be slavemasters and those they would

hold as slaves. The general situation involves multiple victims and multiple perpetrators, all interacting.


8/20

There are many, many different scenarios. I even considered writing an academic paper on the topic,

something like Mind Control Games People Play. Suppose you assume a particular set of

technologies is available. What logically follows from that? It is like science fiction except that the

reality these days is beyond science fiction. The military might call it wargaming. It is amazing the

hideous sorts of operations that are possible with only your basic secret video/audio surveillance of an

individual. Now assume that a targetable voice projection device exists. What could the people

controlling it do in the worst case? What sorts of deceptions could they carry out? What

countermeasures could be adopted? When it really does exist and the consequences are so far-reaching,

isnt it unconscionable to leave the public in the dark about it? Could a politician resist abusing this

secret power?

For the purposes of the rest of this essay I will assume our composite victim has been injected or

implanted somehow with a brain bug that transmits tracking information as well as audio and video of

the sights, sounds, and internal subvocalized thoughts the nonconsenting victim experiences. This is

something like an advanced form of the CIAs Acoustic Kitty project from the 1960s, where a cat was

wired up as a motor-controlled listening device to be used in spying. The difference is many years of

technological refinement integrated circuits were not even available then, let alone nano-scale devices

and the obvious difference that a human being is being tortured. I assume that this device can alsoinject sounds which the victim perceives as if he or she heard or thought them in internal speech.

This is somewhat less control than what some victims report experiencing, but nonetheless is sufficient

to illustrate most of the methods. Even if such devices are not available to some particular group,

variations of most of the techniques can be created by lower-tech methods like standard surveillance

devices and external zapping or voice projection devices which are publicly known to exist. The point

is not the particular technological implementation, but what the victim experiences.

The Realtime Idiot and the Autopig The term I use for an external voice projected into a victims

mind is the realtime idiot. For an illustration of what the realtime idiots seem like, consider a secret

studio like at a radio station. The DJs in this case are the rapists monitors who sit and listen to theviolated thoughts of the victim. These torturers also have microphones where they can converse with

the unfortunate victim in realtime. The victim hears these transmitted voices in his or her head. Perhaps

the rapists also have a virtual reality computer display of everything the victim is doing at the time, or

even a display of exactly what the victim sees through his or her eyes. Any thoughts the victim has,

the realtime idiots try to pretend it is like a conversation with them. You could not think a rhetorical

question to yourself in your own private thoughts without the realtime idiots comments. You could not

pause for a moment of silent mental reflection. They comment on things, they harass, they goad, they

distract, they try to issue commands, they attempt to demean the victims (Go brush your teeth). This

all while the victim tries to live his or her regular, ordinary life and interact in the phony society.

At this point I have described the technique whereby Nazi pigs beam words and voices into the mind of

the victims in order to harass and torture them. This requires too many low-level Auschwitz guards,

though. These dumb sadists may get drunk and start talking, or they may get religion and try to expose

their former activities. The need for personnel also limits the number of victims, or subscribers, who

can be controlled by the system. The American answer, of course, is to use technology to automate the

process and increase productivity. This results in a device I call the autopig (or the Cameron/Delgado

memorial autopig).

The autopig at its simplest is just a digital recorder that sends fixed messages to the victims at random

times. This is very similar to Camerons psychic driving torture that he inflicted on people coming in forpsychiatric health care. I sometimes call these random pulses Bergeron pulses after Vonneguts short

story Harrison Bergeron (not the movie, which is good but different from the short story). In the story

all people were forced to be equal by handicapping those with exceptional abilities, and strong


9/20

thinkers had to wear a device which would periodically emit a loud tone designed to disrupt the their

thought stream.

Of course an autopig could also be used as a computer-aided torture device so that a single human

torturer could switch between victims, secure in knowing that none of them was being left alone in their

private minds. The Delgado part comes in when the device gets feedback from the victims brain and

sends an appropriate message. That is, the sensor system analyzes the brain rape data, an AI-like

algorithm decides what sort of response to send to the victim, and then the digital voice simulator

constructs it and sends it. Thus each victim has his or her own electric fence or something like the

invisible fencing they use on dogs but more technologically sophisticated. (You can consider things like

stateful autopigs and stateless, or memoryless, autopigs, and so forth. It is basic engineering.)

Besides realtime idiots and autopigs, there is something I call a Delgado button. A Delgado button is a

button the harassers can press and which stimulates some part of the brain. There may be many Delgado

buttons, for example, and the harassers learn what each one does empirically by observing the victims.

To the victim a Delgado button would just feel like some sensation, experience, or emotion came over

them all of a sudden. It might occur at a particularly inappropriate time, for example. It might also serve

as a distraction when the pigs wanted to stop some particular thought train you were having. It might be

difficult to notice some subjects in published research would rationalize such induced behaviors and say

that they just decided to do whatever behavior the buttons evoked. A Delgado button also need not

literally be a button and a brain electrode, it could also be something like a microwave beam at a

particular frequency and with a particular modulation aimed at a person. Metaphorically there can also

be conditioned software Delgado buttons in addition to the hardware wired-in electrode buttons.

Data Analysis Under Torture Now that I have described the basic mind control operation, in this

section I consider the problem of data analysis for a victim of such crimes. Dont blame the victims try

to understand the hideous position they were thrown into and which they in no way got to choose.

Naive science-dude has probably not spent 5 minutes considering what victims are forced to agonize

over for years. The situation is closer to game theory with a malicious opponent rather than to the

usual study of natural science, where natural phenomena are considered to be repeatable (or at least

indifferent).

The victims must rely mostly on their own sensations and introspection that is just the nature of this sort

of advanced, secret torture. This is not to say that evidence of the ordinary sorts of harassment should

not be collected, or that a breakthrough will not occur and someone will learn how to detect whatever

signals or devices are used to inflict the mind control torture and make it available to the victims. The

first challenge for the victim, though, is just to figure out what is really going on. Many do not even

have the language to describe what is happening to them. They have to see beyond the stagecraft(tradecraft) of the Nazi technical illusionists. The victims need to live their lives each day with

whatever mental firewall countermeasures they can adopt in their minds. Beyond this they can gather

evidence to convince other people or for a lawsuit. They will discover, though, that for the time being

the court system, like the psychiatric system, is part of the problem.

How many times does someone have to beam a clearly external voice into your head before you have to

question all your thoughts? Not too many times, once really. Some victims of this one-shot voice

projection mind control may still suffer for years. When will you believe they are not reading your

thoughts or that they are not trying to manipulate you? When the truth commission reveals the crimes?

No, you will never believe them again once you know how the pigs operate. Most victims suffer fromfar more than just one voice projection experience, though.

Internal and External Thoughts and Sensory Inputs Inside the mind, the torture victims really are


10/20

human beings just like everyone else (even though they are treated worse than anyone would treat a

dog). They see with their eyes, hear with their ears, etc., have internal dialogs thinking about things,

sparks of intuition, and all the usual features of the human mind. As mentioned earlier, these are the

processes the mind controllers attempt to hijack. For the victims we can consider that their thoughts fall

into three categories: internals, conditioned internals, and externals.

An internal is a normal, natural thought grounded in external sensory input that the person consensually

engages in. The usual thought model that most people have the luxury of believing is that all of their

interactions are consensual and that their private thoughts are actually private and not tampered with.

That is, they only experience internals.

An external is a nonconsensual input, like Camerons psychic driving where a person is strapped down

and forced to listen to manipulative recording loops. In the modern sense, the externals are the voices

projected into a persons mind from an external source. (You can theoretically have consensual

externals, even of this sort, but the victims certainly never saw a consent form and youd be a fool to

consent to having the pigs the victims are familiar with have anything to do with your mind.) The signal

from a programmed autopig chip in the head would also count as an external. An external could also be

an email from a Nazi that is based on mind-raped data. Any normally consensual interaction becomes an

external when mind-raped data or psychological triggers are purposely embedded there.

A conditioned internal, in the sense being discussed here, is an internal thought process that is a direct

result of the torture by externals. The mental fruit of the poisoned tree, so to speak. After a week or so

of having you are a good marine drilled into your head from nonconsensual externals, then when the

machine is turned off there will likely still be the tendency to hear the phrase. (Besides whatever other

damage such harassment causes.) This is especially true if the conditioning was specifically focused on

certain stimuli though random stimuli also become conditioned in the same way that a bell ring is

associated to the bowl of food by the salivating dog. A similar-sounding phrase, for example, can serve

as a trigger for a conditioned internal. Conditioning during trauma is also strong and long-lasting and

can bring back vivid feelings of the original torture experience.

The manipulators can probably get some unwitting victims to march around their own homes like

controlled robots. Peoples sensitivity to what is internal or external in their head would vary

according to the person. Age, length of abuse, and the particular technology and techniques used would

also influence who becomes witting nonconsensual. Perhaps this is a part of what determines who

they harass and try to break and who they secretly control. Those susceptible to hypnosis might be

especially vulnerable, and some victims may be influenced only while they sleep. (Is it terrorism to call

for blowing up a Nazi torture center that doesnt exist?)

The Protocol A way to verify that a signal is purely external is via the protocol. This protocol

assumes you have a cooperative person on the other end of the external channel you wish to

authenticate. In practice, what you learn is that if there is such an external channel you do not have a

friendly witting on the other end. (And victims know from long experience that there is such an

external channel.) That is, the protocol is a way that a friendly witting could authenticate to you the

existence of an information channel that supposedly doesnt exist.

If you have visual, auditory, or tactile contact with a person the protocol is easy. (It is better if they

cannot see or hear you, since that constitutes another, uncontrolled data path.) Suppose you can hear a

person talking. Then the protocol is to think to yourself something like, say 4533. You may wish to

choose something else they could say without attracting attention, if that is a problem, but be sure it is

something which is very unlikely without a mental send. Count, say, five seconds for a response. Either

they hear your thoughts or not, and they either respond or not. In this case the channel is specific to a


11/20

person and may not exist or the person may not be a friendly. For visual contact the situation is

similar, you can think something like, hold up three fingers. Notice that this protocol also works for

something like listening to a realtime broadcast such as radio. A similar protocol works for written

media, think write the number 6423 and email it to me or put it in your newspaper column. Note,

though, that in all cases there may still be a hidden man in the middle.

You can actually verify a pure external send and receive without visual, auditory, or tactile contact. Just

the mental contact. This applies to anyone and everyone who can hear your thoughts and send a

reply. It requires that you have a calculator, and a cooperative person with a calculator on the other end

of the channel. The protocol is, What is the cosine of 1999? The first four digits after the decimal, in

radians, one at a time. If the pigs cannot send that data they are either retarded or engaging in a

conspiracy. There are a couple of other possibilities, including pure internals, but the point is to have a

cryptographic authentication challenge to verify a pure external send and receive. Anyone can punch the

buttons 1, 9, 9, 9, cos on a calculator. I do not know the answer, but I can check it easily. [You should

change the number 1999 to something else for your own protocol, since you want to be able to conclude

a pure external read and send. The number is something you only think "to yourself," and choose a new

challenge number each time you check a response with a calculator.]

They never send valid four-digit numeric data, let alone the correct answer. They do send numerics,

though, and could presumably program the answer into the autopig. And they get sloppy sometimes and

you get a good strong piece of data that indicates external reads and sends, even though they do not

send the protocol. This is one reason such a protocol is useful: It illustrates what the ideal data would

look like for a remote read and send, and can help clarify more ambiguous situations. But keep in mind

possible magician-like deceptions as were mentioned earlier.

The Calibration Problem In evaluating uncertain data in the real world, including that from hostile

sources, it is important to calibrate the expected level of background noise. If you are reading the torture

between the lines, you also need to keep your head and not go off on too much unconnected symbolism.

Keep this in mind when reading items that truly could not possibly relate to you or your situation. This

gives you an idea of the basic background level for symbols, etc., to appear. Keep a threshold and

discard any questionable data. The good data points tend to be frequent enough, and at some point even

they do not tell you much you do not already know.

As an example, suppose you cursed the pigs, just in your head, sometimes. If you get them angry they

sometimes screw up. Say you were taunting them by asking them whether they picked up your thoughts

in Niger (as an random example of a far-off place). By the way, you can taunt them all you want in your

head, since it is only you and the Nazis there. Likewise, curse the pigs that bug your house all you want.

They just do not seem to understand that if they reveal anything they know about your private mentationor private conversations in your home they cannot call you crazy. It would be like entering the FBI tapes

of Martin Luther King saying the FBI was out to get him as evidence that he was paranoid. The voice

in my head said I was crazy. Back to the Niger example, suppose you then get email from someone

claiming to be a victim, who has a name very similar to yours, and who claims that he went to Niger and

could not escape the harassment. That seems pretty unlikely for a coincidence. Then the question is, is

the person a witting or unwitting harassment agent, i.e., is it another victim manipulated into harassing

you or is it a cointelpro agent? How many people have been to Niger? Many victims are understandably

afraid to talk about such experiences, though.

Reasoning Under Uncertainty One thing that the mind controllers do and which manipulatorsand propagandists have done for all time is to exploit weaknesses in human reasoning. The brain is a

fantastic, beautiful organ of the human body no human being on the earth should ever be tortured. But

humans also tend to have some weaknesses in evaluating data compared to, say, a mathematical


12/20

algorithm. One difficulty lies in dealing with uncertainty. The mind control victim is literally

overwhelmed with uncertainty and must sort things out as best as he or she can. The victim has to

consider every weird thing that has ever happened to him or her, whether it is related, and knowing that

the mind rapists will see this thought process and try to reinforce any misconceptions. Another difficulty

is dealing with distractions, especially when they come in on a hostile channel that the brain was

never meant to be accessed on. Proportionality and scale are another difficulty, and people tend to think

binary rather than continuous, and one-dimensional rather than multi-dimensional. People often have a

tendency toward superstitious thinking. Finally, in a social sense, people are very bad at dealing with big

lies, i.e., conspiracies of liars.

Understand aggregate statistics. You can sometimes reason better with them. As an example, you know

that there are some people in the world you can trust you just dont know exactly which ones they are.

You can often estimate aggregate statistics better, since if you get one wrong here or there it all averages

out. Suppose you estimate, based on a great deal of data, that posters on some mailing list are, say, 40%

agents and provocateurs, 35% real victims and activists, 15% who probably consider themselves

scientific, nonsuperstitious thinkers looking for the truth, and another 10% who are unclassifiable. There

are some who you are sure enough about to not worry with percentages, but in general any particular

person on that list is suspect. Nonetheless, the list can still function as a way to reach and connect the35% of mind control victims and activists. It may also serve as a way to convince and educate some of

the actual open-minded decent people who are not mind control victims. Another use of aggregate

statistics is to reason from historical records. We know that there are thousands of mind control victims

in the population, at the least. We just do not know which particular people claiming to be victims are

the actual victims (or which still unwitting people were/are victims). Never forget the humanity of the

real human beings involved in the statistics, though.

The Asymmetry of Dignity You are a human being with unalienable human rights. Unalienable

means that they cannot be taken away. They can be violated, infringed, ignored, and even legislated

away, but the acts of a tyrant do not change the fact that you are a human being with unalienable humanrights. This means that the tyrant is always a tyrant, and remains a tyrant, to meet the fate of tyrants. The

same holds for the lackeys and collaborators of tyrants. This is a fundamental asymmetry between the

citizen and the tyrant.

Torture demeans the torturer. The dignity of the torture victim cannot be taken away by the torturer, but

the act of torture destroys the dignity of the torturer. This is not enough punishment for such hideous

crimes, but gives cause to pity the torturer even as you work to hang the pig. Let me explain about what

I mean about justice for the victims of these treasonous Nazis, who commit crimes against their fellow

American citizens in peacetime which would be war crimes even against an enemy in warfare. Under a

legitimate government such people would receive life sentences in a humane prison system. That wouldbe my preference, but the United States currently has neither. So when I talk about hanging the pigs I

am referring to whatever justice-type processes can be set into motion. That was the subject of Part II.

Get the right ones. We will not forget, and when these pigs are 75 years old they are still Nazi pigs and

still serve the rest of their worthless lives in a humane prison cell if such exists. The legitimate

government treats mind control torture like the true crime it is, even when government agents are

involved in committing the crimes.

You have absolute free mentation in your brain and mind. Your freedom of thought is unalienable.

The Nazi Pig Theorem The adjective, Auschwitz-level, to describe these crimes, is not hyperbole.If you do not feel like you need to vomit, you probably do not really understand the full sickness of

mind control crimes. Gordon Thomas wrote in the introduction to his book Journey Into Madness: The

True Story of CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse: In working on this book I have had to come to


13/20

terms with my own emotions disbelief, bewilderment, disgust, and anger and, more than once in the

early stages, a feeling that the subject was simply too evil to cope with. Nothing I had researched before

could have prepared me for the dark reality of doctors who set out to deliberately destroy minds and

bodies they were trained to heal. Torturers can never blame their victims, though they invariably try.

These torturers are the sorts of people who will repeatedly hit a bound and gagged victim with a stick

and then try to claim the victim caused it. Theyll steal from you and then complain about the property

they stole theyll rape you and sneer at the quality of the sex.

This brings me to what I refer to as the Nazi Pig Theorem (NPT). Strictly speaking it is a metaphorical

axiom, but it can be very useful to the torture victim. It basically asserts that if you act like Mengele then

you are a Nazi pig. Then there are a few obvious conclusions that are also part of the theorem.

The Nazi Pig Theorem (NPT):

Anyone who nonconsensually violates your brain/mind/mentation using Mengele-like methods is

a Nazi pig.

You do not care what a Nazi pig thinks. You do not care about a Nazi pigs opinions. You do not

respond to a Nazi pig ridiculing you, threatening you, trying to distract you, or otherwise trying tomanipulate you.

You work to get a Nazi pig hanged.

Isnt that obvious? Dont you believe it? Then remember it and act like you know it. NPT is as sharp asa razor.

The contrapositive of NPT is also useful: If they are not Nazi pigs then they are not raping your brain.


14/20

So you can think anything about anyone its just you and the Nazis in your mind, and their opinions do

not matter at all. If you have a passing thought about someone and the Nazis try to harass you with it or

make you feel guilty about it, it does not matter. The Nazi pigs opinions do not matter (unless they

somehow help to get the pigs hanged). If you think some thought about someone who really is raping

your brain, then you have some worse things to think about that Nazi piece of human garbage than what

floated through your brain originally.

One use of the Nazi Pig Theorem is to try to go on with ordinary life even as you are being tortured and

you know the true, evil nature of the society you are living in. Spend some time each day working for

justice in the physical world, and the rest of the time try to ignore the Nazi pigs and get on with your life

as best as you can. My philosophy is basically to wish people well, and any differences I have had with

people are all water under the bridge after not too long. But atrocities never, ever pass under the bridge.

The victims never forget, and never should forget. Of course any victim is free to choose to forgive his

or her torturers, but for torturers to lecture their victims about forgiveness is the Christianity of the

oppressor. Forgiveness also does not preclude justice.

The unfortunate reality is that when dealing with anyone, they are either a Nazi or a non-Nazi. Torture

makes it that clear. This is the top node of the decision tree for the torture victim, and it is a stark split.

The following diagram illustrates the split:

That is clear enough. Of course the difficult part is that you do not know exactly who is a Nazi pig and

who is not. So you might start off with a reasonable benefit of the doubt and collect evidence from there

to update your current assumptions. But how do you deal with someone you think has a 10% chance of

being a Nazi pig? How do you deal with someone you think has an 80% chance of being a Nazi pig?

That is your own utility/decision function and it is not easy. People have to make decisions based on

imperfect information all the time, but this purposefully inflicted torture pushes it past what people are


15/20

accustomed to have to deal with in ordinary situations. Nonetheless, the government is accountable for

the aggregate situation where torture occurs regularly and systematically in American society.

The NPT is your firewall. As a corollary, the external firewall theorem states that you do not care

in the slightest bit what Mengele thinks. Analyze the external incomings for nature and source, as

well as for other evidence if you choose to, and then send them straight to your mental /dev/null.

Then work each day to get the pigs hanged in the real world, in the best way you can figure to do

it (see Part II). There is also an internal firewall theorem: Your brain is your own to think

whatever you want with. Simply invoke IFT and think about something entirely different if you

are thinking something that you dont want to be thinking about. Train yourself toward that, at

any rate.

Some Suggestions for Thinking about the Harassment The way to think of a nonconsensual

external is as an advanced cattle prod that can be modulated in various ways to cause you pain. The

modulation happens to be with words or clicks, but that is secondary. It is a modulated cattle prod.

Notice it and try to get a feel for the nature and source of the signal. Where does it seem to be coming

from? What is the quality of the signal? Later you can analyze the psyop sentence the pigs modulated

onto the cattle prod signal if you feel like it. (This may reveal more about them than about you the

modulation is based on you reflected off of their filthy Nazi distorting mirror with their intention

being to cause you harm.) You might keep a rough histogram count on the autopig phrases, for

example. Does the signal ever have a foreign accent or speak a foreign language? Probably not. But

basically understand that the Nazi pigs are complete, pathological liars. If they flatter you one second

theyll kick you in the head three beats later, you can almost count on it. Pathological liars only tell the

nominal truth as part of a larger lie, and the purpose is to destroy your mental well-being and your life.

Source before semantics (signal before semantics). The source is where the signal comes from, both the

person sending it and the sensory input method by which you receive it. The semantics is the meaning

of the signal: it is the interpretation of the signal and its modulation. For example, the semantics of a

signal will often be its interpretation as an English sentence. If the signal comes in on a rape channel, do

not even give it a semantics except perhaps as part of an evidence-gathering process. It is just a sensation

you feel from the external cattle prod. The presence of the nonconsensual external signal itself is torture

and is the only real information, since the modulation is by pathological liars whose intention is to cause

you harm.

Dont debate the autopig (or the realtime idiot). Even if its easy. (Unless you feel like it.) They hate it

when you ignore them. Go on with your ordinary life, meeting people, etc., and especially speaking out

and working for justice in the real world. You can only really ignore them when you know what is

going on, though. Some of the people who they march around their own homes like robots probablythink they are just ignoring it. There is a big difference between an experienced victim deciding to

ignore future signals and some well-meaning advice-giver who has never been tortured telling you to

just ignore it.

If it is indistinguishable from an autopig, treat it as if it were an autopig. With some basic voice-

recognition type software applied to raped subvocalized thoughts, I could write an AI-like program that

sounded just like the repetitive, simple-patterned Nazi pigs I am familiar with. In this sense, the realtime

idiots do not even pass the Turing test. Actual people (who are not torturers) have names, they do not

repeat things endlessly, they think things other than harassing you and commenting on your thoughts,

and they can push a few calculator buttons. For instance, why do you never hear someone driving theircar down the street thinking use a turn signal, you asshole?

Dont explain your thinking to the Nazi pigs, it is better if they misunderstand what they rape from you.


16/20

By default you are only ever thinking to yourself. Work toward the rapid extinction of the Nazi

conditioning imposed on you, at least as rapidly as you can manage. Try to extinguish your conditioned

responses and replace them with only an awareness of the triggering sensation. Some are random events

acting as triggers, while others are purposely inflicted.

It may help to write about what you experience or keep a journal. There are pros and cons to this,

though, since the pigs will have access to what you write also. It might provide them with feedback to

help them torture you or others. If you complain about something they will almost surely start doing it to

you more. You have to weigh whether writing about it helps you to deal with it, like when you can

share it with other people or when you see how stupid it really looks when written out. Stupidity is no

barrier to the torturers, in fact it is part of the torture. For example, if you make a self-deprecating joke it

will not be long before the pigs are goading you with the subject of that joke for real. Of course much of

the torture is never anything clever the torturers do, but your own knowledge that these people who do

not even know you nonetheless hate you enough to violate your mind and then go to a great deal of

effort to try to inflict serious harm on you often seemingly for their own entertainment.

Try tuning out the pigs like you might cure yourself of hiccups. It might work, or at least help you train

yourself to ignore the pigs. Notice the nature and source of the signals, the mental gnats meant to annoy

you. Parasitic mind fleas. If you think like the monkey, youll be as dumb as the monkey. If you watch

that TV too much youll be as dumb as the morons on it. They will entertain you right into digging your

own grave.

How Can a Society I Detest Defile Me? How do you deal with a secrecy-bred society of dumb-as-

cows innocent people, Nazi pigs, and victims? Or the collaborators, apologists, and profiteers? What

about the people who idiotically ask, Why are you ongoing torture victims so obsessed with your

torture (and human rights, etc.)? The social system where no one can talk about the elephant in the

living room, even though many people know at least that something is there. Did people not get born

with tongues to speak with? Or is this a conspiracy of idiots and cowards? What the hell is wrong with

these people? What kind of people complacently live in a society where torture regularly and

systematically occurs, pretending it doesnt? Is it still that old pig slaver mentality, or the ability to look

away from such abominations as an everyday thing? For centuries it was forbidden to teach slaves basic

skills like reading. Is it better if you can read but only have access to lies?

Every day for the mind control victims, it is like the rape victim who has to go out and interact in the

society where her rapist is still at large. The difference is that there is a whole conspiracy of rapists and

they rape the victims each and every day. So perhaps it is closer to what were euphemistically called

comfort girls. How do you think it feels to wake up with a pig in your head? Is that the only

alternative to being dumb as a cow and wearing a gag in this society? The consensus reality of theaverage citizen is far, far from the real truth on the ground.

Americans are the best liars and biggest hypocrites on the planet. They will probably even be flattered

by that description. They love being number one, after all. Hypocrisy is like lies, in the sense that there

is ordinary hypocrisy and there is big hypocrisy. If you credibly call an American a big-sense hypocrite

they will often start spewing propaganda that celebrates ordinary, everyday hypocrisy like not telling

someone their new haircut looks bad. Americans want to be both peepers and prudes, they want to rig

the game and call it free enterprise, and they want to be known for freedom and liberty regardless of any

domestic atrocities they commit. You can never un-torture someone.

If people are capable of outrage there will be far fewer outrages. How dare those pigs do that to

anybody.


17/20

Shae hi:

Like hi: Liked You and one other blogger like this post.

For victims

If its not useful or enjoyable or necessary, its a worthless thought.

Zap it out of existence with IFT and think something else.

Truly internal, self-mind control is a good thing

external nonconsensual mind control is Mengele-like torture.

No nens follow from nonconsensual externals,

except perhaps one to put it in the trash canor a few to analyze it for evidence, nature and source.

But think anything you want. I curse the pigshit Nazis sometimes.

Focus your anger.

Ah, how sad it is, Auschwitz in the springtime

One springtime

after another

You will feel stronger some days, fatigued others

If this essay helps you, read it again when you need a reminder.The Nazi harassment never reflects on you.

Source: www.JBHFile.com Part III: Mental Firewalls By Allen Barker Feb 17, 2002

Categories: articles, blog post, news Tags: Allen Barker, audio recording, bodily harm, Canada,

canadian human rights, crime against humanity, Criminal Code of Canada, Criminal Harassments,

Criminal Negligence, CSIS Act, direct energy weapons, electronic harassments, genocide, hate crime,

human rightrs violations, Illegal, law, legislations, Mental Firewalls, Mental Firewalls By Allen Barker,

organized stalking, perpetrator, physical assault, Privacy, Privacy Act, sociopath, targeted individuals,

torture, uttering threats, videotaping, voice to skull, voyager

radiation and human radiation experimentsAllen Barkers Resisting the Mind Control State

RSS feed

Twitter

ABOUT TIS CANADA


18/20

This is a site for activism, advocacy and networking for people who are targeted by organized stalking

and electronic harassment as well as people who supports the TI community and who believe these

criminal activities are a violation of human rights legislations in Canada and around the globe.

TI - Targeted Individual - is a person being targeted with OSEH by a group of individuals called

"perps" for the purpose of human experimentations.

* * *

OSEH - Organized StalkingElectronic Harassment - are methods use by perps in targeting a specific

person for the purpose of inducing harm and possibly death.

* * *

DEW - Direct Energy Weapon - are device used for OSEH purposes, weapons can be microwave

with pulp frequencies, v2k or other electronic and hearing devices.

* * *

V2K - voice to skull device - is a weapon use for transmitting voices with low or high frequencies.

Voices can be for commands or harassments attacks that may look like the TI's own voice. V2K can

also use to induce or manipulate dreams or to deprived TI sleeps.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted materials the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by

the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding ofcriminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, & social justice issues. We

believe this is not an infringement of any such copyrighted materialsas in accordance to the the fair

dealing clauses of the Canadian Copyright Act, that allow users to engage in certain activities relating to

research, private study, criticism, review, or news reporting. We are making an exerted effort to mention

the source of the material, along with the name of the author, performer, maker, or broadcaster for the

dealing to be fair again in accordance with the allowable clause. For more info visit: Wikipedia: Fair

Dealing Canada

EVIDENCE OF OSEH


19/20

Twitter Updates

McVeigh: The Manchurian Candidate by David Hoffman http://t.co/g1whXdIB5 hours ago

Timothy McVeigh - The Militia-Military Connection by Tod Ensign http://t.co/pR5dybi8

3 days ago

Reading The Silent Massacre on Scribd http://t.co/mnhXCaCE#readcast3 days ago

Reading Community Notifications and Gang Stalking on Scribd http://t.co/XQgz0qol#readcast

3 days ago

Recent Posts

McVeigh: The Manchurian Candidate by David Hoffman

Timothy McVeigh The Militia-Military Connection by Tod Ensign

Richard ColvinVictims Stories 1999 2005

Hacking & Computer Crime in General

Archives

Select Month

links

DefinitionsHRC @ Facebook Group

HRC @ Scribd

HRC @ Soundcloud

HRC @ Vodpod

HRC @ You Tube

HRC TIS Canada @ Facebook

HRC TIS Canada @ Twitter

OSEH @ Vimeo

Stop Bullying! Canada!

TIS Canada @ Blogspot

TIS Canada @ Livestream

TIS Canada @ Podbean


20/20

TIS Canada @ Vimeo

TIS Canada @ You Tube

Email Subscription

You are following this blog (manage).

Blog Stats

109,333 hits

RSS - Posts

RSS - Comments

TopWordPressBlog at WordPress.com. Theme: INove by NeoEase.

178-Allen Barker Mental firewall

Documents

Transcript of 178-Allen Barker Mental firewall