16th September 2014
-
Upload
marvene-grealish -
Category
Documents
-
view
30 -
download
1
description
Transcript of 16th September 2014
![Page 1: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Convergence for everyone?Detecting disparate signals of
genomic adaptive convergence in several different datasets:
Initial results, lessons & perspectives
16th September 2014
Joe Parker, Queen Mary University London
![Page 2: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Adaptive molecular convergence
• Definition• Methods to detect• Datasets and results• Sampling issues• Interpretational issues• Future
![Page 3: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Defining molecular convergence
• Surprisingly hard• It isn’t:
– Divergence (adaptive or neutral)– Conservation or purifying selection– Retention of ancestral states with secondary
changes in outgroups– ‘Neutral’ homoplasy
• It ought to be:– ‘Adaptive’ homoplasies– ‘Excess’ homoplasies
![Page 4: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Observations
• ‘Adaptive convergence’ predicated on assumption adaptive sites ‘count’ more - conditions for detection?
• Can parallel changes with dN/dS ~ 1 be ‘convergent’
• ‘Excess’ - a problematic definition without a good null model– Odds-ratio based?– Empirical CDF?– Eyeball…
![Page 5: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Methods
• Species phylogeny and inputs• Selection detection• Site-based methods• Tree-based methods
![Page 6: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Site-based methods
• Look at tips– Sample balance?
![Page 7: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Site-based methods
• Look at tips
• Reconstruct ancestral changes
![Page 8: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Site-based methods
• Look at tips• Reconstruct ancestral changes
• Pairwise P(conv) ~ P(div) changes
![Page 9: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Site-based methods
• Look at tips• Reconstruct ancestral changes• Pairwise P(conv) ~ P(div) changes
• BEB posterior probabilities
![Page 10: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Tree-based methods
• de novo tree search– Inference error– Signal : noise– Multiple phylogenies
![Page 11: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Tree-based methods
• ∆SSLS (likelhood comparison)– Which hypotheses?– Multiple simultaneous comparisons?– Models insensitive– How extreme
![Page 12: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Tree-based methods
• Unrestricted / ennumerated phylogeny fitting
![Page 13: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Trees and sites methods
• dN/dS and ∆SSLS correlation
![Page 14: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Trees and sites methods
• Random control tree correction
![Page 15: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Genomic approaches
• Pool information across sites– Are loci comparable– Error rates?
• Orthology, paralogy
![Page 16: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Sampling
• Sampling balance– Within locus– Between loci
• Gene selection / ascertainment bias• Networks• Tree selection• a priori phylogenies
![Page 17: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Convergence in echolocating mammals
• 22 mammals, 2,326 loci• Convergence signals across
genome
![Page 18: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Convergence in echolocating bats
• The• The
![Page 19: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Convergence in mole-rats
• The• The
![Page 20: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Interpretational issues
• Relative measure• Strength of evidence• Null model? Sampling? Which
phylogenies
![Page 21: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Interpretation
• Notional convergence detected genomically, or not at all
• Selection, incongruence• Which trees?
![Page 22: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Which Trees?
• Choice of hypothesis, subtly different from usual practice
• If we accept tree space distance important…
• … Hypotheses are parameters• Ennumerate over trees?
![Page 23: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Future directions
• Null model• Alternative (convergent) model• Tree space distance
![Page 24: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Conclusion
• Strong evidence molecular convergence, or something like our best definition of it, is a pervasive force
• Very early work; contrast with e.g. early dN/dS tests
![Page 25: 16th September 2014](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062722/56813948550346895da0e57f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Acknowlegements
• Colleagues• Institutions• Funding