13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

48
13 - 1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning

Transcript of 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

Page 1: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

1313 Aggregate PlanningAggregate Planning

Page 2: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

OutlineOutline Aggregate Planning

0bjective

Planning Horizon

Aggregate Planning Strategies Capacity Options

Demand Options

Mixing Options to Develop a Plan

Page 3: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Outline – ContinuedOutline – Continued

Aggregate Planning in Services

Methods for Aggregate Planning Chase Strategy

Level Strategy

Mixed Strategies

Page 4: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

When you complete this chapter you When you complete this chapter you should be able to:should be able to:

1. Define aggregate planning

2. Identify optional strategies for developing an aggregate plan

3. Prepare a graphical aggregate plan

4. Compute and compare the cost of different aggregate plans

Page 5: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Frito-LayFrito-Lay

More than three dozen brands, 15 brands sell more than $100 million annually, 7 sell over $1 billion

Planning processes covers 3 to 18 months

Unique processes and specially designed equipment

High fixed costs require high volumes of production and high utilization of equipment

Page 6: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate PlanningAggregate Planning

The objective of aggregate planning The objective of aggregate planning is to meet forecasted demand while is to meet forecasted demand while minimizing cost over the planning minimizing cost over the planning

periodperiod

Page 7: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

The Planning ProcessThe Planning Process

Objective is to minimize cost over the planning period by adjusting Production rates

Labor levels

Inventory levels

Overtime work

Subcontracting rates

Other controllable variables

Determine the quantity and timing of production for the intermediate future

Page 8: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate PlanningAggregate Planning

A logical overall (aggregate) unit for measuring sales and output

A forecast of demand for an intermediate planning period in these aggregate terms

A method for determining costs

A model that combines forecasts and costs so that scheduling decisions can be made for the planning period

Requirements for aggregate planning:

Page 9: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Planning HorizonsPlanning Horizons

Figure 13.1

Long-range plans (over one year)Research and DevelopmentNew product plansCapital investmentsFacility location/expansion

Intermediate-range plans (3 to 18 months)Sales planningProduction planning and budgetingSetting employment, inventory,

subcontracting levelsAnalyzing operating plans

Short-range plans (up to 3 months)Job assignmentsOrderingJob schedulingDispatchingOvertimePart-time help

Top executives

Operations managers

Operations managers, supervisors, foremen

Responsibility Planning tasks and horizon

Page 10: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate PlanningAggregate Planning

Quarter 1

Jan Feb Mar

150,000 120,000 110,000

Quarter 2

Apr May Jun

100,000 130,000 150,000

Quarter 3

Jul Aug Sep

180,000 150,000 140,000

Page 11: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate Aggregate PlanningPlanning

Figure 13.2

Page 12: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate PlanningAggregate Planning

Combines appropriate resources into general terms

Part of a larger production planning system

Disaggregation breaks the plan down into greater detail

Disaggregation results in a Master Production Schedule (MPS) and MPS becomes input to material requirements planning

Page 13: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate Planning Aggregate Planning StrategiesStrategies

1. Use inventories to absorb changes in demand

2. Accommodate changes by varying workforce size

3. Use part-timers, overtime, or idle time to absorb changes

4. Use subcontractors and maintain a stable workforce

5. Change prices or other factors to influence demand

Page 14: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Capacity OptionsCapacity Options1. Changing inventory levels

Increase inventory in low demand periods to meet high demand in the future

High inventory may increases costs associated with storage, insurance, handling, obsolescence, and capital investment

Low inventory may cause shortages which may mean lost sales due to long lead times and poor customer service

Page 15: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Capacity OptionsCapacity Options

2. Varying workforce size by hiring or layoffs Match production rate to demand

Training and separation costs for hiring and laying off workers

New workers may have lower productivity

Laying off workers may lower morale and productivity

Page 16: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Capacity OptionsCapacity Options

3. Varying production rate through overtime or idle time Allows constant workforce

May be difficult to meet large increases in demand

Overtime can be costly and may drive down productivity

Absorbing idle time may be difficult

Page 17: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Capacity OptionsCapacity Options

4. Subcontracting Temporary measure during

periods of peak demand

May be costly

Assuring quality and timely delivery may be difficult

Exposes your customers to a possible competitor

Page 18: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Capacity OptionsCapacity Options

5. Using part-time workers Useful for filling unskilled or low

skilled positions, especially in services

Page 19: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Demand OptionsDemand Options1. Influencing demand

Use advertising or promotion to increase demand in low periods

Attempt to shift demand to slow periods

May not be sufficient to balance demand and capacity

Page 20: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Demand OptionsDemand Options

2. Back ordering during high- demand periods Requires customers to wait for an

order without loss of goodwill or the order

Most effective when there are few if any substitutes for the product or service

Often results in lost sales

Page 21: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Demand OptionsDemand Options

3. Counterseasonal product and service mixing Develop a product mix of counter-

seasonal items

May lead to products or services outside the company’s areas of expertise

Page 22: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate Planning OptionsAggregate Planning Options

Table 13.1

Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments

Changing inventory levels

Changes in human resources are gradual or none; no abrupt production changes.

Inventory holding cost may increase. Shortages may result in lost sales.

Applies mainly to production, not service, operations.

Varying workforce size by hiring or layoffs

Avoids the costs of other alternatives.

Hiring, layoff, and training costs may be significant.

Used where size of labor pool is large.

Page 23: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate Planning OptionsAggregate Planning Options

Table 13.1

Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments

Varying production rates through overtime or idle time

Matches seasonal fluctuations without hiring/ training costs.

Overtime premiums; tired workers; may not meet demand.

Allows flexibility within the aggregate plan.

Sub-contracting

Permits flexibility and smoothing of the firm’s output.

Loss of quality control; reduced profits; loss of future business.

Applies mainly in production settings.

Page 24: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate Planning OptionsAggregate Planning Options

Table 13.1

Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments

Using part-time workers

Is less costly and more flexible than full-time workers.

High turnover/ training costs; quality suffers; scheduling difficult.

Good for unskilled jobs in areas with large temporary labor pools.

Influencing demand

Tries to use excess capacity. Discounts draw new customers.

Uncertainty in demand. Hard to match demand to supply exactly.

Creates marketing ideas. Overbooking used in some businesses.

Page 25: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate Planning OptionsAggregate Planning Options

Table 13.1

Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments

Back ordering during high-demand periods

May avoid overtime. Keeps capacity constant.

Customer must be willing to wait, but goodwill is lost.

Many companies back order.

Counter-seasonal product and service mixing

Fully utilizes resources; allows stable workforce.

May require skills or equipment outside the firm’s areas of expertise.

Risky finding products or services with opposite demand patterns.

Page 26: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Methods for Aggregate Methods for Aggregate PlanningPlanning

A mixed strategy may be the best way to achieve minimum costs

There are many possible mixed strategies

Finding the optimal plan is not always possible

Page 27: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Mixing Options to Mixing Options to Develop a PlanDevelop a Plan

Chase strategy Match output rates to demand

forecast for each period

Vary workforce levels or vary production rate

Favored by many service organizations

Page 28: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Mixing Options to Mixing Options to Develop a PlanDevelop a Plan

Level strategy Daily production is uniform

Use inventory or idle time as buffer

Stable production leads to better quality and productivity

Some combination of capacity options, a mixed strategy, might be the best solution

Page 29: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Graphical MethodsGraphical Methods

Popular techniques

Easy to understand and use

Trial-and-error approaches that do not guarantee an optimal solution

Require only limited computations

Page 30: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Graphical MethodsGraphical Methods1. Determine the demand for each period

2. Determine the capacity for regular time, overtime, and subcontracting each period

3. Find labor costs, hiring and layoff costs, and inventory holding costs

4. Consider company policy on workers and stock levels

5. Develop alternative plans and examine their total costs

Page 31: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 1Roofing Supplier Example 1

Table 13.2

Month Expected DemandProduction

DaysDemand Per Day

(computed)

Jan 900 22 41

Feb 700 18 39

Mar 800 21 38

Apr 1,200 21 57

May 1,500 22 68

June 1,100 20 55

6,200 124

= = 50 units per day6,200

124

Average requirement =

Total expected demand

Number of production days

Page 32: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 1Roofing Supplier Example 1

Figure 13.3

70 –

60 –

50 –

40 –

30 –

0 –Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month

22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number ofworking days

Pro

du

ctio

n r

ate

per

wo

rkin

g d

ay

Level production using average monthly forecast demand

Forecast demand

Page 33: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 2Roofing Supplier Example 2

Table 13.3

Cost Information

Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month

Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit

Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)

Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)

Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit

Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)

$300 per unit

Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)

$600 per unit

Plan 1 – constant workforce

Page 34: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 2Roofing Supplier Example 2

Table 13.3

Cost Information

Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month

Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit

Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)

Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)

Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit

Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)

$300 per unit

Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)

$600 per unit

Plan 1 – constant workforce

MonthProduction

Days

Production at 50 Units

per DayDemand Forecast

Monthly Inventory Change

Ending Inventory

Jan 22 1,100 900 +200 200

Feb 18 900 700 +200 400

Mar 21 1,050 800 +250 650

Apr 21 1,050 1,200 -150 500

May 22 1,100 1,500 -400 100

June 20 1,000 1,100 -100 0

1,850

Total units of inventory carried over from onemonth to the next = 1,850 units

Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers

Page 35: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 2Roofing Supplier Example 2

Table 13.3

Cost Information

Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month

Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit

Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)

Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)

Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit

Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)

$300 per unit

Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)

$600 per unit

Plan 1 – constant workforce

MonthProduction

Days

Production at 50 Units

per DayDemand Forecast

Monthly Inventory Change

Ending Inventory

Jan 22 1,100 900 +200 200

Feb 18 900 700 +200 400

Mar 21 1,050 800 +250 650

Apr 21 1,050 1,200 -150 500

May 22 1,100 1,500 -400 100

June 20 1,000 1,100 -100 0

1,850

Total units of inventory carried over from onemonth to the next = 1,850 units

Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers

Costs Calculations

Inventory carrying $9,250 (= 1,850 units carried x $5 per unit)

Regular-time labor 99,200 (= 10 workers x $80 per day x 124 days)

Other costs (overtime, hiring, layoffs, subcontracting) 0

Total cost $108,450

Page 36: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 2Roofing Supplier Example 2

Figure 13.4

Cu

mu

lati

ve d

eman

d u

nit

s7,000 –

6,000 –

5,000 –

4,000 –

3,000 –

2,000 –

1,000 –

–Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Cumulative forecast requirements

Cumulative level production using average monthly

forecast requirements

Reduction of inventory

Excess inventory

6,200 units

Page 37: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 3Roofing Supplier Example 3

Table 13.2

Month Expected DemandProduction

DaysDemand Per Day

(computed)

Jan 900 22 41

Feb 700 18 39

Mar 800 21 38

Apr 1,200 21 57

May 1,500 22 68

June 1,100 20 55

6,200 124

Minimum requirement = 38 units per day

Plan 2 – subcontracting

Page 38: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 3Roofing Supplier Example 3

70 –

60 –

50 –

40 –

30 –

0 –Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month

22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number ofworking days

Pro

du

ctio

n r

ate

per

wo

rkin

g d

ay

Level production using lowest

monthly forecast demand

Forecast demand

Page 39: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 3Roofing Supplier Example 3

Table 13.3

Cost Information

Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month

Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit

Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)

Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)

Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit

Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)

$300 per unit

Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)

$600 per unit

Page 40: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 3Roofing Supplier Example 3

Table 13.3

Cost Information

Inventory carry cost $ 5 per unit per month

Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit

Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)

Overtime pay rate $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day)

Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit

Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)

$300 per unit

Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)

$600 per unit

In-house production = 38 units per day x 124 days

= 4,712 units

Subcontract units = 6,200 - 4,712= 1,488 units

Page 41: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Table 13.3

Cost Information

Inventory carry cost $ 5 per unit per month

Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit

Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)

Overtime pay rate $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day)

Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit

Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)

$300 per unit

Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)

$600 per unit

Roofing Supplier Example 3Roofing Supplier Example 3

In-house production = 38 units per day x 124 days

= 4,712 units

Subcontract units = 6,200 - 4,712= 1,488 units

Costs Calculations

Regular-time labor $75,392 (= 7.6 workers x $80 per day x 124 days)

Subcontracting 29,760 (= 1,488 units x $20 per unit)

Total cost $105,152

Page 42: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 4Roofing Supplier Example 4

Table 13.2

Month Expected DemandProduction

DaysDemand Per Day

(computed)

Jan 900 22 41

Feb 700 18 39

Mar 800 21 38

Apr 1,200 21 57

May 1,500 22 68

June 1,100 20 55

6,200 124

Production = Expected Demand

Plan 3 – hiring and layoffs

Page 43: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 4Roofing Supplier Example 4

70 –

60 –

50 –

40 –

30 –

0 –Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month

22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number ofworking days

Pro

du

ctio

n r

ate

per

wo

rkin

g d

ay Forecast demand and monthly production

Page 44: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 4Roofing Supplier Example 4

Table 13.3

Cost Information

Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month

Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit

Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)

Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day)

Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit

Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)

$300 per unit

Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)

$600 per unit

Page 45: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Roofing Supplier Example 4Roofing Supplier Example 4

Table 13.3Table 13.3

Cost InformationCost Information

Inventory carrying costInventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month$ 5 per unit per month

Subcontracting cost per unitSubcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit$10 per unit

Average pay rateAverage pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)$ 5 per hour ($40 per day)

Overtime pay rateOvertime pay rate $ 7 per hour $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day)(above 8 hours per day)

Labor-hours to produce a unitLabor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit1.6 hours per unit

Cost of increasing daily production rate Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training)(hiring and training)

$300 per unit$300 per unit

Cost of decreasing daily production rate Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs)(layoffs)

$600 per unit$600 per unit

MonthMonthForecast Forecast

(units)(units)

Daily Daily Prod Prod RateRate

Basic Basic Production Production

Cost Cost (demand x (demand x

1.6 hrs/unit x 1.6 hrs/unit x $10/hr)$10/hr)

Extra Cost of Extra Cost of Increasing Increasing Production Production (hiring cost)(hiring cost)

Extra Cost of Extra Cost of Decreasing Decreasing Production Production (layoff cost)(layoff cost) Total CostTotal Cost

JanJan 900900 4141 $ 14,400$ 14,400 —— —— $ 14,400$ 14,400

FebFeb 700700 3939 11,20011,200 —— $1,200 $1,200 (= 2 x $600)(= 2 x $600) 12,40012,400

MarMar 800800 3838 12,80012,800 —— $600 $600 (= 1 x $600)(= 1 x $600) 13,40013,400

AprApr 1,2001,200 5757 19,20019,200 $5,700 $5,700 (= 19 x $300)(= 19 x $300) —— 24,90024,900

MayMay 1,5001,500 6868 24,00024,000 $3,300 $3,300 (= 11 x $300)(= 11 x $300) —— 24,30024,300

JuneJune 1,1001,100 5555 17,60017,600 —— $7,800 $7,800 (= 13 x $600)(= 13 x $600) 25,40025,400

$99,200$99,200 $9,000$9,000 $9,600$9,600 $117,800$117,800

Table 13.4Table 13.4

Page 46: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Comparison of Three PlansComparison of Three Plans

Table 13.5

Cost Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3

Inventory carrying $ 9,250 $ 0 $ 0

Regular labor 99,200 75,392 99,200

Overtime labor 0 0 0

Hiring 0 0 9,000

Layoffs 0 0 9,600

Subcontracting 0 29,760 0

Total cost $108,450 $105,152 $117,800

Plan 2 is the lowest cost option

Page 47: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Mathematical ApproachesMathematical Approaches Useful for generating strategies

Transportation Method of Linear Programming Produces an optimal plan

Management Coefficients Model Model built around manager’s

experience and performance

Other Models Linear Decision Rule

Simulation

Page 48: 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning.

13 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Aggregate Planning in Aggregate Planning in ServicesServices

Controlling the cost of labor is critical

1. Accurate scheduling of labor-hours to assure quick response to customer demand

2. An on-call labor resource to cover unexpected demand

3. Flexibility of individual worker skills

4. Flexibility in rate of output or hours of work