111
-
Upload
barry-gregory -
Category
Travel
-
view
840 -
download
2
description
Transcript of 111
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Neil Hughes
Languages and International Studies
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Intro
Core concepts– Andean Region– Indigenous – Neoliberalism
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Andean Region– 7 countries– Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia
Geography- highland and lowland regions
Culture- indigenous practices, customs and traditions
Society- poverty and social inequality
Politics- democracy, social protest
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Indigenous– Descendants of those that
inhabited a territory prior to colonisation
– Maintain traditional practices, customs and traditions
– Self-identify as indigenous– Close association with
ancestral territories– Linguistic difference– Social, economic and
political marginalisation
Indigenous protest in the Andes
Neoliberalism– Theory that has dominated
policy-making in developed and developing world since 1980s
– Economic crisis: low growth, high inflation, high unemployment
– Consensus about causes Excessive state intervention,
trade unions, anachronistic social practices
– Consensus about solutions Market reforms: privatisation,
deregulation, trade and investment liberalisation; curb trade union powers, extend private property
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
– Benefits: growth, employment, consumer choice– Milton Friedman: democratic governance– Criticism: Stiglitz, Harvey, Klein
According to Harvey “the process of neoliberalisation has entailed much creative destruction, not only of prior institutional frameworks and powers but also of divisions of labour, social relations, welfare provisions, technological mixes, ways of life and thought, reproductive activities, attachments to the land and habits of the heart”
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
– Naomi Klein: The Shock Doctrine
– Criticism in developing world
– Latin America: social protest, political instability, change in political culture
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Lecture– Incidence of protest– Causes of protest– Social composition – Action repertoire– impact
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Incidence of protest– Observatorio Social de
América Latina– 2000-2004: 180%
increase– Argentina, Bolivia,
Ecuador– Peru since 2006: 250%
increase
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Causes of protest– Neoliberal economic
policies Free trade Privatisation of natural
resources
– Free trade: Peru: 2005 Competition from
subsidised imports, impact on food security
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
– Resource privatisation Bolivia 2000: Water War
– Cochabamba– Aguas de Tunari: price increases of up to 150%– Protest involving: “rural peasant irrigators, local water
collectives, urban workers, middle classes, elderly men and women, shantytown dwellers, the traditional left, and anybody unhappy with the established order and its corruption and inefficiency” (Silva, 2009, p.127)
– Cocaleros: Evo Morales– Bolivian Rural Workers’ Union: Felipe Quispe
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
– Cancellation of water privatisation.
– “the water war marked a turning point in resistance to neoliberalism. It was a local issue with national resonance in which tried and true government mechanisms of political exclusion, manipulation and repression only stiffened resolve and expanded mobilisation by heterogeneous social groups that included middle classes, who obtained significant concessions” (Silva, 2009, p.131)
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Peruvian Amazon 2008/9: AIDESEP– International Law: Convention 169 of the International
Labour Organisation– Brian Keane (Land is Life) “International agreements and
inter-American human rights law recognise indigenous peoples’ rights to their lands, and explicitly prohibit the granting of concessions to exploit natural resources in their territories without their free, prior and informed consent”
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
– Since 2006: 50 drilling concessions, 70% of Peruvian Amazon open to exploration
– Ideological onslaught: “The Syndrome of the Orchard Dog”, “nature is a resource”, “laziness and indolence”
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Social Composition– Indigenous and peasant organisations– Ecuador: Donna Lee Van Cott (2005, p.138): “by the mid
1990’s, the indigenous movements had become the most powerful Ecuadorian collective social actor and the object of increasingly favourable public opinion”
– CONAIE: 80% of indigenous population– Bolivia: Cocaleros, Rural Workers’ Union– Peru: AIDESEP, Peruvian Peasants’ Federation
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Action Repertoire– Direct action: demonstrations, strikes, sit-ins, occupations
Road blockades: poor transport infrastructure, effective, violent confrontations
– El Alto, Bolivia, 2003: 67 protestors killed– Civil Action in US courts
Protest marches; Bolivia 2000, Chapare to la Paz
– Electoral Politics Ecuador: Pachakutik Bolivia: Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS)
– Evo Morales first indigenous head of state
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Impact– Blockage or repeal of
neoliberal reforms– Ousting of several
governments: Ecuador 2000 and 2005
– Constitutional recognition of indigenous rights: Ecuador 2000, Bolivia 2009
Bolivia: indigenous self-rule, seats set aside in Congress for minorities, control of renewable resources, access to water a fundamental human right
– Increased political representation
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
Impact– Blockage or repeal of indigenous reforms– Ousting of several governments: Ecuador 2000
and 2005– Constituional recognition of indigenous rights:
Ecuador 2000, Bolivia 2009 Bolivia: indigenous self-rule, seats set aside in Congress
for minorities, control of renewable resources, access to water a fundamental human right
– Increased political representation
Indigenous Protest in the Andes
“The goals are clear: to regain a measure of national economic autonomy, to reconstruct the mixed economy, to reintroduce industrial policy, to offer land reform for indigenous and mestivo peasants, to protect popular sectors from the market by providing services and subsidies; to construct institutions for a more participatory democracy; and to politically include intellectuals and popular sector leaders in his administration” (Silva, 2009, pp.145-6_