110228 acedp water sensitive cities
-
Upload
international-watercentre -
Category
Technology
-
view
629 -
download
2
description
Transcript of 110228 acedp water sensitive cities
The International WaterCentre (IWC)
Water Leadership for the Future IWC - creating tomorrow’s leaders in water management by changing
the way people think about, act and solve complex water
management challenges
Outline
• Water Sensitive Cities – current strategies
• Water Sensitive Cities – future strategies
• City of Brisbane – Healthy Waterways Case Study
Managing Water as a Wicked Problem?
Australian Public Services
Commission (2007)
Key Characteristics: 1. Difficult to clearly define problem
2. Many interdependencies &multi-causal
3. Attempts to address problem often
leads to unforseen consequences
4. Problem is not stable
5. There is no clear solution
6. Problem is socially complex
7. Rarely the responsibility of any one
organisation
8. Solution involves changing behaviour
9. Characterised by chronic policy failure
Transitioning towards a Water
Sensitive City …. The present?
Presentation Heading
Water Sensitive
City
Water Cycle
City
Waterways
City
Drained
City
Sewered
City
Cumulative Socio-Political Drivers
Service Delivery Functions
Water Supply
City
Supply
hydraulics
Water supply
access &
security
Drainage,
channelisation
Flood protection
Separate
sewerage
schemes
Public health
protection
Brown et al (2008).
Point & diffuse
source pollution
management
Social amenity,
environmental
protection
Evolving Urban Water Hydro-Social Contract
21st Century – the century of cities
The world is undergoing the
largest wave of urban growth
in history. In 2008, for the
first time in history, more
than half of the world’s
population will be living in
towns and cities.
UNFPA, June 2007
Responding to Water Pollution
Visual impacts of trapping Gross
Pollutants
Investment in Science
Responding to Water Pollution
Bridgewater Creek, South Brisbane
Bridgewater Creek Urban Retrofit Concept
Bridgewater Creek Wetland Construction
Bridgewater Creek Wetland
Stormwater Biofiltration Technologies
Stormwater Garden Processes
During Rainfall Event
1. Runoff
2. Detention
3. Filtration
4. Drainage
5. Bypass
Dry Stormwater Garden
Hampton Park Wetland
(Melbourne Water)
Lynbrook Estate Wetland
(VicUrban)
All Nations Park Wetland
(City of Darebin)
NAB Building Forecourt
Wetland
Blacken Ridge
Bioretention Basin (BCC)
Baltusrol Estate
(Australand)
Victoria Park
(Landcom)
Cremorne Street
(City of Yarra)
Melbourne Docklands
(Lend Lease)
Baltusrol Estate
(Australand)
Bourke Street Tree
Planters
(Lend Lease)
Building Bioretention
Planters (Portland,
Oregon, USA)
WSUD: Wetland & biofiltration technologies
Implementation of Bioretention Technologies
What performance can we expect?
– Over 95% of Total Suspended Solids,
– Over 50% of Total Nitrogen (TN)
– Over 85% of Total Phosphorous (TP),
– Over 90% of heavy metals
– Over 80% of pathogen removal
Expected reductions in concentrations of ‘typical’
stormwater:
Waterway Corridors
Catchment Modelling School 2005
workshop session, Brisbane
Toolkit Product Managers’
Workshop, Canberra, July 2004
Above top left: Catchment Modelling School 2005 workshop
session, Sydney
Above top right: Joel Rahman, presenting at Catchment
Modelling School 2005, Sydney
Above left: André Taylor instructing at Catchment Modelling
School 2005, Sydney
Above right: Break from session, Catchment Modelling School
2005, Brisbane
Professional industry capacity building
Responding to Water Scarcity
Pressure &Leakage
Management Aquifer Project Recycled Water
Scheme
Reactivating Dams
Responding to Water Scarcity
Public Awareness
Responding to
Water Scarcity
Water Grid
Transitioning towards a Water
Sensitive City …. The future ?
Presentation Heading
Water Sensitive
City
Water Cycle
City
Waterways
City
Drained
City
Sewered
City
Cumulative Socio-Political Drivers
Service Delivery Functions
Water Supply
City
Supply
hydraulics
Water supply
access &
security
Drainage,
channelisation
Flood protection
Separate
sewerage
schemes
Public health
protection
Point & diffuse
source pollution
management
Social amenity,
environmental
protection
Diverse, fit-for-
purpose sources &
end-use efficiency,
waterway health
restoration
Limits on natural
resources
Brown et al (2008), and Wong and Brown (2008)
Adaptive, multi-
functional
infrastructure &
urban design
reinforcing water
sensitive values &
behaviours
Intergenerational
equity, resilience to
climate change
Evolving Urban Water Hydro-Social Contract
Water Sensitive Cities: What is the
Potential ?
• Drivers – Climate change and associated
uncertainties
– Growing population and urbanisation
– Price of water
– Changing community needs and expectations
• Opportunities – Linking water with energy, ecological landscapes,
social capital
– Influencing micro-climate and mitigating the
urban heat island effects
– Drainage infrastructure augmentationtrategies – Urban design integrates all elements
The Melbourne
Urban Heat Island
0100h March 23, 2006
Coutts, Beringer and Tapper
Urban Policy and Research,
2008
‘Cliff’ ‘Cliff’
‘Cliff’ ~4 deg.C
January 2009 heat wave
bodies to State Morgue
Av deaths =16
Combined effects of climate change, increased health care costs, increased
urbanisation and aging population = $$$$
Surface Temperature Inhomogeneity Associated With
Urban Fabric
ENVI-met urban urban
micrometeorological
modelling suite (includes
human comfort)
A mid-summer mid-afternoon
simulation for low density
housing in Melbourne
(Nadine D’ Argent - Monash
Ph.D. student)
Causes of Urban Warmth
• The nature of surface materials (i.e.
thermal characteristics and colour
(albedo) of surfaces)
• Surface shapes and structures (the
complex nature of urban geometry)
• Alterations in urban air quality
• The presence of heat sources (cars,
industry, space heating, metabolic
heat, etc)
• Surface waterproofing and especially
removal of urban storm water
• Building Flexibility & Adaptability in its water
sources
“Cities as Water Supply Catchments”
• Green Infrastructure
“Cities providing Ecosystem Services”
• Building social and institutional capital
“Sophisticated and Water Smart Cities”
Water Sensitive Cities
– key themes
Desalination plants ? Dams ?
Recycle sewage ?
We must employ ALL these solutions if our
cities are to become resilient to climate and
social pressures.
Urban Water Solutions
• Diversity of water sources of water (ie. alternative sources including
stormwater, sewer mining, recycled wastewater, desalinated water)
• Diversity of infrastructure (ie. centralised and decentralised systems
promoting a fit-for-purpose framework for matching water usage to
water quality)
Cities as Water Supply
Catchments
Treatment
Header Tank
Treated water
for toilet reuse
To sewer
Supplementary
Mains water
Collection of
light
greywater
Overflow
to sewer
Dual Water Supply Reticulation - “A basis for inter-generational equity”
• Emerging role of decentralised water services (and private enterprise
participation)
$9 Billion -
SEQ Water
Grid • Desalination at Gold Coast
• Western Corridor Recycled Water
Scheme
• Southern Regional Water Pipeline
• New Traveston Dam
• Recommissioned dams
• Aquifer Production Bores in
Brisbane
Queensland Water
Commission
Our knowledge of the traditional ‘values’ of open
spaces and landscape features needs to be
bolstered with an understanding of the ‘ecological
functioning’ of the urban landscapes that capture the
essences of sustainable water management, micro-
climate influences, facilitation of carbon sinks and
use for food production.
Cities providing Ecosystem Services :
Ecological Landscapes…
• water quality improvement
• management of stormwater as a resource
• flood mitigation
• buffering aquatic ecosystems from the effects of catchment
urbanisation and climate change
• influencing urban micro climates
Ecological Functions
•Water
•Shade
•Evapo-transpiration
•Orientation
Cities providing
Ecosystem Services:
Ecological
Landscapes…
Water
Reuse
Greywater directly used to
irrigate and flush toilets.
The cascading living wall
provides treatment.
Microclimate
Living walls help to
regulate both internal and
external microclimate
• Community receptive to a ecologically sustainable
lifestyle
• Industry skilled at sustainable urban water
management
• Government policies underpinning inter-agency
collaboration and public/private engagement
Sophisticated and Water Smart Cities
Water Sensitive
City
Water Cycle
City
Waterway
City Drained
City
Sewered
City
Water Supply
City
How can we transition to the
Water Sensitive City?
Transitioning from the ‘Drained City’
to the ‘Waterway City’
Socio-Institutional Barriers 1. lack of a common vision
2. institutional fragmentation
3.undefined organisational responsibilities
4. limited political incentives and disincentives
5.poor organisational commitment
6. technological path dependency
7.poor community capacity to meaningfully participate, and
8. lack of experience with facilitating integrated management
processes
Brown and Farrelly (2009, in press)
1. Socio-Political Capital
Community, Media and Political
2. Champions
Vision
Multi-sectoral network
3. Accountability
Coordination Processes
Water Cycle
Land-use Planning
4. Reliable & Trusted Science
Academic Leadership
Technology Development
5. Market Receptivity
Business Case for Change
6. Bridging Organisations
Facilitates Science – Policy
Facilitates Capacity Building
7. Binding Targets
Measurable System Target
Science, Policy and Development
8. Strategic Funding Points
Dedicated external funds
9. Demonstration Projects
Experimentation,
Technology Development
Policy and Institutional learning
Water Sensitive
City
Water Cycle
City
Waterway
City
Drained
CitySewered
City
Water Supply
City
Water Sensitive
City
Water Cycle
City
Waterway
City
Drained
CitySewered
City
Water Supply
City
Key Transition Factors (Brown & Clarke, 2007)
Brisbane City Council’s Journey to a WaterSmart City
What is a WaterSmart City?
Where we have been We are here Where we want to be
A well designed city
Sustainable
water use
Healthy River
& bay
Journey towards a Water Smart City
Water Supply City Sewered City Drained City Waterways City Water Cycle City Water Smart City
Adapted from the ‘Urban Water Management Transitions
Framework’ diagram (Brown et al, 2008)
What is a WaterSmart City?
For Brisbane - A City that manages its
water to deliver livability. A City that: • thinks City, plans neighbourhood
• has adaptive, diverse and flexible infrastructure
• is resilient
• reconnects people with water
• has multi-functional landscapes
• provides multiple and varied sources of water
• provides intergenerational equity
What is a WaterSmart City?
Three City-wide Outcomes:
1. Well Designed City
2. Healthy River and Bay
3. Sustainable Water Use
Key Performance Indicators:
1.By 2026, 50% of stormwater from the City’s urban footprint will be treated
using WSUD devices
2.By 2031, the WQO’s of all of SEQ’s waterways will be met
A well designed city
Sustainable
water use
Healthy River
& bay
Adaptive Management and
Effective Monitoring and Evaluation
1. Strategy direction (Healthy River and Bay)
measured through outcome KPI’s - e.g. By 2031,
WQO’s of all of SEQ waterways will be met.
2. Program effectiveness measured through
program and site/ investment effectiveness - e.g.
Flood immunity: reduce the number of flood
effected residents across the City.
3. Project effectiveness measured through site
investment effectiveness - e.g. waterway
rehabilitation: site riparian and aquatic habitat
increased, water quality improved.
3 Scales of monitoring and evaluation
Waterway Health Enhancement:
Protect high value
Enhance those at greatest risk from irreversible
decline
Catchment-based
Adaptive management
Create Healthy Waterways Program
Waterway Enhancement Program
– Improve waterway health
– Creek and catchment
– (Rehab) and (WSUD)
– $6 million annually
Creek Rehabilitation
Pollutant removal (WSUD)
Where are resources allocated
most effectively?
?
? ?
Priority Catchment Selection
Ecological Values
Pressures
• Aquatic
Conservation
Assessment
• Pollutant loads
(modelling)
• Development
Pressure
Priority
Catchment
% BCC Ownership Community
Spatial Optimisation
Results
• 6 Sub-Catchment Types – Type A – High Value in protected, forested sub-
catchments
– Type B - high value under high threat from land use change
– Type C- high value, moderately disturbed, partly protected
– Type D- moderate value under moderate – high threat
– Type E- low value with moderate to high threat
– Type F- low value with low threat
(Refer pg 29 report)
Results
Riparian Zone Ecosystem Services
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Nemira Street
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Church Road
N
Rogers Parade
Hoffman Street
Trouts Road
Horn Road
Pick ‘N’ Pay
Zillmere Road
Aspley High
Longbill Place
Poplar Place
Gertrude Street
Boondall Wetlands
Gateway
Lemke Road
Roghan Road
Pineapple Street
Dorville Road
Rotary Park
Albany Creek Road
Beckett Road
Old Northern Road
Bill Brown
Telegraph Road
N
Bank Protection A Very High Habitat Corridor Aesthetics Shade Sub-surface Nitrogen Removal Surface Water Filtering
B High C Moderate D Low E Very Low
LEGEND Waterways Assessment Sections Subcatchment Boundaries
1000 metres Flood Abatement Recreation
NA Waterway Piped or RZES Not Assessed
Riparian Zone Ecosystem Services -
Status
Final Project Sites- Strategy
Triple Bottom Line Assessment
Create Healthy Waterways Program
Future:
provide multiple outcomes in Healthy Waterways projects
Create Healthy Waterways Program
Future:
provide multiple outcomes in Healthy Waterways projects
Create Healthy Waterways Program
Future:
provide multiple outcomes in Healthy Waterways projects