1 USG Interagency Working Group WJTSC 10-1 USG Interagency Working Group 31 March 2010.

1

USG Interagency Working Group

WJTSC 10-1USG Interagency Working Group

31 March 2010

2


Agenda• 0800 – 0815 Welcome and Introductions Mr. Gary Quay, JS J-7

• 0815 – 0900 Training for Integrated Ops Mr. Frank DiGiovanni,

OSD (R&T)

• 0900 - 0930 Information Sharing Mr. Bill Barlow, OSD (NII)

LTC Bob Klein, OSD (P)

• 0930 – 0950 ACC’s ANGEL THUNDER Lt Col Patrick Pope, ACC/A3J

• 0950 – 1000 National Intelligence Support Team Maj Roland Sarino, NIST

• 1000 – 1015 BREAK

• 1015 – 1040 R&S FY 10/11 TEE Mr. Eric Halzel, DoS S/CRS

3


Agenda

• 1040 – 1045 Interagency Logistics Symposium CDR Novak-Tibbet, TRANSCOM

• 1045 – 1130 UN Office for the Coordination of Mr. Fred Polk, UN OCHA

Humanitarian Affairs Mr. Michael Marks, UN OCHA

• 1130 – 1200 Center for Complex Operations Mr. Dale Erickson, CCO

• 1200 – 1300 LUNCH

• 1300 – 1320 JTIMS Discussion Mr. Gary Quay

• 1320 – 1340 Status of FY 11/12 Support Requests Mr. Rob Webster

• 1340 – 1410 Future Focus of Working Group Mr. Gary Quay

• 1410 – 1430 Standing Issue Mr. Gary Quay

4


Agenda

• 1430 – 1445 BREAK

• 1445 – 1600 New Issues Mr. Gary Quay

• 1600 – 1615 Training for Integrated Operations Mr. Gary Quay

• 1615 – 1630 Working Group Wrap up / Closing Remarks Mr. Gary Quay

• 1630 – 1700 COCOM /Services Breakout Mr. Gary Quay

5


Goals

• Share information and build relationships

• Identify our integrated operations training roles

• Define purpose and goals of this WG

• Determine disposition of standing issue

• Identify and Discuss Potential New Issues

• Discuss Way-ahead

6


Conference Theme: Training for Integrated Operations• Problem: Emerging and existing strategic guidance continues to emphasize a

comprehensive approach involving all elements of U.S. national power, and involvement of other stakeholders, in a complex operational environment is becoming the norm in solving national security challenges. The level of synchronization and coordination to fully operationalize integrated activities requires focused preparation in joint training programs.

• Background: DOD defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives. DODD 1322.18 directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks.

• Synonymous expressions such as “comprehensive approach” or “unified action” are variants of this DOD-defined term. Unified Action is “the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of the activities of governmental and nongovernmental entities with military operations to achieve unity of effort.”

• Chairman’s Joint Training Guidance, identifies “Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Nongovernmental Organization Coordination” as a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff High Interest Training Issue for incorporation as appropriate into combatant command joint training programs.

7


Issue 07-001: Inadequate partner representation/environmental emulation in Combatant Command and Service training, education, exercises, and experimentation degrades the quality of these events.

Discussion: DOD recognizes the value of non-DOD partner participation in its exercises. Partner participation provides authoritative and realistic input and support to training events; however, satisfying participation requests is hampered by both interagency capacity to support and perceptions of shared objectives and value.

End State: DOD events reflect current policy and the complexity of integrated planning and operations.

POA&M: To enhance partner integration: 1. Identify and analyze participation gaps.. 2. Develop potential mitigation strategies.

OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/HD, JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB

FY 09

Implement process for FY

10/11

Initiate Process for FY 11/12

Year end assessment

SEP 09 1st Quarter FY 10

Publish Draft FY 10/11 Plan

Feb 10 FY 11

Interagency Process Effectively Supports

DoD Exercises

Integration of Interagency Partners

Update at WJTSC 10-1

MAR 10

Complete POA&M

FY10

8


Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated Civ-Mil training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements.

Discussion:

• DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct Civ-Mil operations with non-DOD partners

• Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common civ-mil operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training.

End State: Partner integration in DoD training events facilitates a holistic collaborative approach to achieve National Security objectives and properly balance diplomacy, development, and defense.

POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD strategy for engagement with interagency partners , , including a funding strategy.including a funding strategy. 2. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 3. Develop mission essential tasks that reflect partnership roles in integrated operations. 4. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 5. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal.

OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/P, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB

FY 12

DOD Training Effectively Supports Integrated

Operations

Training for Integrated Operations

Complete Strategy

FY10

Complete CJCSI

FY10

Develop METS

FY10

Assess Readiness

Impact

FY10/11FY10

Develop TCOI Portal

9


Issue 10-xxx: The current NEP does not adequately facilitate the exercise of real world international threat streams and adversaries. Consequently, combatant commands cannot realistically exercise their contingency plans with interagency partners if they link to the NEP.

Discussion:

• Recent CMX and PR/AWGSE 10 SLS discussions indentified the requirement for a National Level Rehearsal

• Domestic incident management does not incorporate international threat streams and disrupt/respond options

• Requirement for an exercise construct with senior whole of government integration for maximum collaboration and participation

• Requirement for a senior level rehearsal program with flexibility to keep ahead of current threats

• Requires exercise integration of real world threat streams on an annual basis (Example: CT, Cyber, WMD)

• Requirement to partner with interagency during development and execution of National Level Rehearsal

• COA 1: Enhance/modify current NEP construct developing exercise framework addressing actual OCONUS threats on an annual basis

• COA 2: Develop new National Rehearsal Program commensurate with NEP

National Rehearsal Program

10


MAR 10 JUN 10APR 10 MAR 11

Identified issue

Developconcept

brief

NLR 11 (AW 11)

pilot

AW 11 Senior level

CDC

MAY 10 JUL 10

Endstate: A national rehearsal program that brings together disrupt/respond options to real world threat streams in a whole of government context

POA&M

• Establish whole of government community of interest

• Establish series of IPRs

• Establish AW 11 as a pilot for the National Level Rehearsal

• Conduct a senior CDC to discuss NLR 11

• Initiate discussions among GO/FO/SES senior leaders

• Conduct strategic level mission analysis and COA development

OPR: OSD(P), JS J7 and SOCOM OCR: COCOMs and interagency partners


Establish community of interest

Initial strategic level MA and COA

Dev

COAdecision

2012

11



- What We’ve Done

- Where We’re Going

Mr. Frank DiGiovanni

ODUSD(Readiness)

12


Information Sharing – Update

Mr. Bill Barlow

OASD (Networks & Information Integration)

LTC Bob Klein

ODASD (Partnership Strategy & Stability Ops)

13


Air Combat Command’s ANGEL THUNDER

Lt Col Patrick Pope

ACC/A3J

14


National Intelligence Support Team

Maj Roland Sarino, NIST

15


BREAK

16


2010 Interagency Logistics Symposium

CDR. Novak-Tibbet

USTRANSCOM

17


UN Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination:

Response Operations and Training

Mr. Fred Polk & Mr. Michael Marks

UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

18


LUNCH

19


Reconstruction & Stabilization

FY10/11 Training, Exercises, Experiments

Mr. Eric Halzel

DoS, S/CRS

20


Mr. Dale Erickson

Center for Complex Operations

Provincial Reconstruction Team Lessons-Learned Project

21


Joint Training Information Management System

Mr. Gary Quay

22


JTIMS

• Fy11/12 is first cycle for use as system of record

– COCOM use (positive/issues)

– Services use

– Reports

• JS J-7 use

– Quality of information

– HQ vs. AOR support

– Reports

23


Mr. Rob Webster

DoD FY11/12 Interagency Support Requests

24


Mr. Gary Quay

Future Focus of Working Group

25


WJTSC USG Interagency Working Group

• Purpose: – Ensure DoD events promote an integrated operations approach– Promote interagency coordination and collaboration that improves civilian and

military training and exercising for integrated operations– Improve the realism and quality of DoD exercises and experiments– Ensure DoD events meet the exercise and operational needs of interagency

partners and DoD– Identify training and exercise issues and Plans of Action & Milestones

• Organizations Invited to Attend: – USG Interagency Partners - Services – OSD - Combat Support Agencies– Joint Staff - National Guard Bureau– Combatant Commands

26


• Purpose- What should be the focus?- What can we accomplish?- Who should attend

Benefit to IA Partners- How can the WG benefit/assist IA Partners?- Is this forum appropriate for USG issues?

Benefit to DoD- How can the WG assist the DoD attendees?

Venue- Would a change increase attendance?- Couple with other conference?- Location?

27


Mr. Gary Quay

Standing and New Issues

28


Issue 07-001: Inadequate partner representation/environmental emulation in Combatant Command and Service training, education, exercises, and experimentation degrades the quality of these events.

Discussion: DOD recognizes the value of non-DOD partner participation in its exercises. Partner participation provides authoritative and realistic input and support to training events; however, satisfying participation requests is hampered by both interagency capacity to support and perceptions of shared objectives and value.

End State: DOD events reflect current policy and the complexity of integrated planning and operations.

POA&M: To enhance partner integration: 1. Identify and analyze participation gaps.. 2. Develop potential mitigation strategies.

OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/HD, JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB

FY 09

Implement process for FY

10/11

Initiate Process for FY 11/12

Year end assessment

SEP 09 1st Quarter FY 10

Publish Draft FY 10/11 Plan

Feb 10 FY 12

Interagency Process Effectively Supports

DoD Exercises

Integration of Interagency Partners

Update at WJTSC 10-1

MAR 10

Complete POA&M

FY10/11

29


1. Identify and analyze participation gaps..

- How many agencies and departments did you invite to be part of the training audience for your events?

- What academics could not be accomplished because a member of the IA did not participate?

- What experimentation could not be completed because the IA community could not provide the required subject matter expertise?

- What training objectives were not achieved because you did not have IA participation?

- For COCOMs, how many exercises conducted in the past year involved either the J5, JIACG, POLAD, SDA, SEA, or other imbedded interagency partners to help identify IA requirements and assisted in the invitation of IA participants?

2. Mitigation strategies.

Integration of Interagency Partners – WJTSC 10-2

30


BREAK

31



32


Conference Theme: Training for Integrated Operations

• Problem: Emerging and existing strategic guidance continues to emphasize a comprehensive approach involving all elements of U.S. national power, and involvement of other stakeholders, in a complex operational environment is becoming the norm in solving national security challenges. The level of synchronization and coordination to fully operationalize integrated activities requires focused preparation in joint training programs.

• Background: DOD defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives. DODD 1322.18 directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks.

• Synonymous expressions such as “comprehensive approach” or “unified action” are variants of this DOD-defined term. Unified Action is defined as “the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of the activities of governmental and nongovernmental entities with military operations to achieve unity of effort.”

• Chairman’s Joint Training Guidance, identifies “Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Nongovernmental Organization Coordination” as a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff High Interest Training Issue for incorporation as appropriate into combatant command joint training programs.

33



Background: DODD 1322.18 defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives.

DODD 1322.18 directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks.

Requirement: Questions to consider for your working group functional area of interest:

What are our priorities for the conduct of Integrated Operations Training?What are the joint training requirements for Integrated Operations Training?What gaps are identified that hinder effective Integrated Operations Training?

Bottom Line: How does integrated operations training change our joint training perspectives?

Conference Theme Discussion

34


Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated Civ-Mil training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements.

Discussion:

• DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct Civ-Mil operations with non-DOD partners

• Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common civ-mil operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training.

End State: Partner integration in DoD training events facilitates a holistic collaborative approach to achieve National Security objectives and properly balance diplomacy, development, and defense.

POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD strategy for engagement with interagency partners , , including a funding strategy.including a funding strategy. 2. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 3. Develop mission essential tasks that reflect partnership roles in integrated operations. 4. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 5. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal.


FY 12


Operations


Complete Strategy

FY10

Complete CJCSI

FY10

Develop METS

FY10

Assess Readiness

Impact

FY10/11FY10

Develop TCOI Portal

35


UNAgenciesUNICEF

WFPUNDP

NGO

UNHCR

NGO

NGO

USG/Embassy

Red Cross

ICRC

Host Country Government

NGO

Donor

OtherGovernments

NGO

Donor

NGOLocal NGO

For-profit

For-profitFor-profit

DisasterTourist

Journalists

BCT

BCT DisasterTourist

Example of Integrated Operations Battle Space

36


10TH MTN SSI

NTC

USJFCOM

CTCS

S/CRS

USAID

CAMP ATTERBURY

MUSCATATUCKCOCOMS

SERVICES

USDA

SYNCRONIZED

&

INTEGRATED

GOOD TRAINING

Synchronizing USG Efforts

37

USG Interagency Working GroupMissed Civ-Mil Training Opportunities

H OM E

S T A T I O N

A C A D E M I C S

C I V S

T O

M I L I T A R Y

E V E N T S

M I L

T O

F S I

&

MU S C A T A T U C K

S T E A D Y

S T A T E

C I V

M I L

T N G

Separate Tracks Result In Missed Opportunities for Integrated Training Prior to Deployment

- Need to leverage all opportunities to train together at existing venues

- Need to develop common operating picture by sharing vignettes and story lines

Afghanistan

Regional

Provincial

District

Integrated

Operations

Army

USMC

Civ

38

USG Interagency Working GroupTraining for Integrated Operations

• Exercise Participation- Who coordinates training within civilian agencies (CRC & non-CRC)- Who acts as training audience and who develops exercise- How are civilian training objectives developed

• Are the COCOM JELC and Service training cycles structured to facilitate integrated training

• Do Army and USMC unit training venues accommodate civ-mil training

• Is the military taking advantage of training at civilian venues

• How does DoD determine civilian agency priorities and interests

• How do does the USG identify civ-mil integration requirements and interests

• Are contracted role players adequately replicating current civilian agency issues/operations

• Who pays for civ-mil integrated operations training

39


Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated operations training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements. [DODD 1322.18]

Discussion:

• DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct integrated operations with non-DOD partners

• Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common integrated operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training.

End State: Integrated operations training events achieve USG national security objectives.

POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD training strategy that reflects the operating environment, particularly for engagement with interagency partners , , including a funding strategy.including a funding strategy. 2. Press for a national strategy. 3. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 4. Review mission essential tasks and validate with interagency partners. 5. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 6. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal.


FY 12


Operations


Complete Strategy

FY10

Complete CJCSI

FY10

Develop METS

FY10

Assess Readiness

Impact

FY10/11FY10

Develop TCOI Portal

40



41


Issue 10-xxx: The current NEP does not adequately facilitate the exercise of real world international threat streams and adversaries. Consequently, combatant commands cannot realistically exercise their contingency plans with interagency partners if they link to the NEP.

Discussion:

• Recent CMX and PR/AWGSE 10 SLS discussions indentified the requirement for a National Level Rehearsal

• Domestic incident management does not incorporate international threat streams and disrupt/respond options

• Requirement for an exercise construct with senior whole of government integration for maximum collaboration and participation

• Requirement for a senior level rehearsal program with flexibility to keep ahead of current threats

• Requires exercise integration of real world threat streams on an annual basis (Example: CT, Cyber, WMD)

• Requirement to partner with interagency during development and execution of National Level Rehearsal

• COA 1: Enhance/modify current NEP construct developing exercise framework addressing actual OCONUS threats on an annual basis

• COA 2: Develop new National Rehearsal Program commensurate with NEP


42


MAR 10 JUN 10APR 10 MAR 11

Identified issue

Developconcept

brief

NLR 11 (AW 11)

pilot

AW 11 Senior level

CDC

MAY 10 JUL 10

Endstate: A national rehearsal program that brings together disrupt/respond options to real world threat streams in a whole of government context

POA&M

• Establish whole of government community of interest

• Establish series of IPRs

• Establish AW 11 as a pilot for the National Level Rehearsal

• Conduct a senior CDC to discuss NLR 11

• Initiate discussions among GO/FO/SES senior leaders

• Conduct strategic level mission analysis and COA development

OPR: OSD(P), JS J7 and SOCOM OCR: COCOMs and interagency partners


Establish community of interest

Initial strategic level MA and COA

Dev

COAdecision

2012

43



Background: DODD 1322.18 defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives.

DODD 1322.18 directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks.

Requirement: Questions to consider for your working group functional area of interest:

What are our priorities for the conduct of Integrated Operations Training?What are the joint training requirements for Integrated Operations Training?What gaps are identified that hinder effective Integrated Operations Training?

Bottom Line: How does integrated operations training change our joint training perspectives?

Conference Theme Discussion

44


Questions??

45


Mr. Gary Quay

Working Group Wrap Up & Closing Remarks

46


Mr. Gary Quay

DoD COCOM & Services Breakout

47


How Can JS J-7 Better Support?

TCOI Portal

Quarterly Status Reports

Requirements Process Cycle

??

48


Requirements Process Cycle

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

4th Quarter

3rd Quarter

VTC

Collect DOD Requirements2 years out

WJTSC

Present DOD opportunitiesto Interagency for fill

Review interagency requests for support

Lock 2-year requirements

WJTSC

Publish and Distribute 2-year DOD Interagency

Participation Plan and Interagency Participation

Plan

VTC

Source Requirements

Develop DOD Interagency Participation Plan

Present Plan to EXCOM

49


BACK-UP

50


JEP

5050UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

20

08

20

11

20

10

20

09

AW 08

NLE 09

AF 09

IF 09

AW 10

AW 11

NLR

CEP

NEP

CT Objectives

•Full DoD•Partial/Episodic IA

•Domestic / HD focus•No IA for OCONUS CT•Universal Adversary•Natural Disasters

•Partial/Episodic GCC•No IA •Limited JS

•Full DoD/IA•NSC Oversight•CT focus•Real INTEL

Requirements•Senior JS / OSD and IA

•Combatant Commands

•SecDef/CJCS Approval

•NSC Oversight

•Presidential Policy Directive (commensurate with DHS NEP IP)

Notes/Definitions

AW – Exercise ABLE WARRIOR JEP – Joint Exercise Program NEP – National Exercise Program

AF – Exercise ABLE FOCUS CEP – Chairman’s Exercise Program NLE – National Level Exercise (part of NEP)

IF – Exercise INTERNAL FOCUS CMX – Crisis Management Exercise NLR – National Level RehearsalSLS – Senior Leadership Seminar

CMX 6.0CMX 6.1

CMX 6.2AW 10 SLS

Currently Nonexistent

NEP

Topic 3: National Level Rehearsal ConceptTopic 3: National Level Rehearsal Concept

51


Joint Staff J-7 Roles & Responsibilities

• Focal point for DOD entities for U.S. Government Interagency participation in their training, education, exercises, and experiments

• Focal point for U.S. Government Interagency Community for DOD participation in their training, education, exercises, and experiments

• Standardize the request and sourcing process

• Collate requirements from both DOD and the U.S. Government Interagency Community

• Present opportunities to Interagency Community

• Identify gaps

52


• FY 09 will be the transition year

• FY09 Activities:

– Planning is in progress; JS J-7 will facilitate coordination of FY09 support as needed

– DOD will develop interagency processes and relationships with interagency partners

– DOD will identify and present FY10/11 USG Interagency event opportunities to interagency partners

– JS J-7 will coordinate interagency requests for DOD support– JS J-7 will publish Interagency Participation Plans

DOD Interface With Interagency Partners

53

USG Interagency Working GroupInteragency Participation Plan

• Joint Staff J-7 will prepare an Interagency Participation Plan to present DOD events to interagency partners for consideration

• Plan Attributes:– Common language– Integration of role of Interagency Management System

components, Essential Tasks lists, Major Mission Elements, other agency specific considerations

– Sufficiently detailed to provide clear training objectives– Engages interagency partners early in the Joint Event Life Cycle– Conveys mutual benefits of interagency participation and

facilitates interagency selection of events for participation – Unclassified

54


LTC Curtis Hubbard

J7/9 E&I, Exercises

24 MAR 10

Exercises and Training (U)Exercises and Training (U)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

55


55

Purpose (U)Purpose (U)

• Receive approval and/or guidance on the USSOCOM training / exercise framework (Topic 1)

• Provide “National Level Rehearsal” Concept and receive guidance (Topic 2)

55

56


56

Topic 1: Training / Exercise Framework

56

57


57

Topic 1: Training / Exercise Topic 1: Training / Exercise Framework (U)Framework (U)

• 1 X ABLE WARRIOR annually (J7/9)

• 1-2 X ABLE FOCUS annually (J7/9)

• 2 X Senior leader seminar/Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsals (CTER) (J7/9)

• Quarterly outreach to Combatant Commands and JS/OSD (J35)

• 1 X National Level Exercise (J7/9) – Must be CT related and support USSOCOM objectives– Next potential event: FY 12 (Cyber)

• 1 X GCC ELLIPSE (minimum) with response cell (J7/9)

• 1 X support to other CT exercise with response cell (J7/9)

• CMX(s) (J7/9)

• 2 X monthly internal USSOCOM battlestaff training events (J35)

• Quarterly USSOCOM ESC training events (J35)

• 2 X Semi-Annual Exercise Conferences for ELLIPSE scheduling (J7/9)

57

58


58

Training / Exercise Training / Exercise Proposed Schedule (U)Proposed Schedule (U)

• ABLE WARRIOR: 7-11 Mar 11 (National Level Rehearsal)• ABLE FOCUS: 23-27 Aug 10

– Scenario: LeT/Commonwealth Games– Inclusion of GCC action officers in the exercise control group

• GCC ELLIPSE with USSOCOM response cell – Recommendation: Support ELLIPSE with EUCOM

• Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsals: – Sep 10 (post ABLE FOCUS and prior to Commonwealth Games) – Feb 11 (prior to start of ABLE WARRIOR)

• Senior outreach visit to USNORTHCOM (prior to NLE 10 in May) • CMX 11: 13 Apr 10 (CJCS participation)• CMX 10: 14 Jun 10 (CJCS participation) • Quarterly USSOCOM ESC training events: Jun, Sep, and Dec

10 58

59


59

Topic 2: National Level Rehearsal Concept

59

60

USG Interagency Working GroupNational Level Rehearsal National Level Rehearsal (Background) (U)(Background) (U)

• A “National Level Rehearsal” program does not currently exist• CMX 6 series identified the requirement to rehearse national level

processes to disrupt and/or respond to a CT event• PR/AWGSE 10 Senior Leader Seminar (SLS) identified the requirement for

a “National Level Rehearsal Program” – Senior DoD/interagency participation required– Rehearsal should be validated at the National Security Council level– Chairman’s Exercise Program garners ad hoc and episodic interagency participation

(not a “forcing function”)

• National Level Exercise Program (DHS lead) has not / cannot meet “National Rehearsal” requirements as defined in the SLS – Consequence Management / HD focus vs. OCONUS disrupt / respond – Universal Adversary vs. “Real world” threat streams – Not flexible (themes planned on 5 year cycle)– Majority of NLE scenarios focus on natural disasters vs. terrorism

60

61

USG Interagency Working GroupNational Level Rehearsal (NLR) (U)National Level Rehearsal (NLR) (U)

• ABLE WARRIOR 11 should be elevated to “National Level Rehearsal” status and receive whole of National Security apparatus participation

• NLR aspects– National Security Council directed objectives– Strategic / National Command Post Exercise– DoD supported event as Executive Agent– Interagency partnered in the development and execution process– Principal/Deputies, Undersecretaries and CDRs participation– Flexible and scaleable to current threat streams and most likely/most dangerous

enemy courses of action– Annual execution – Intermediate events (SLS, CTER, TTX, Seminars)

• Requirements– Codified similar to National Exercise Program Implementation Plan (DHS) and/or

Presidential Policy Directive

61

62


62

Recommendations (U)Recommendations (U)

• Approve Training / Exercise framework and associated calendar

• Approve and request JS to prioritize/schedule CTER 10 in Sep 10– JS provide “top-down” message to all GCCs

• Approve concept to begin planning for ABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal 11 as a pilot program– Request JS J-3 to direct applicable JS equities to initiate National Level

Rehearsal program development– Request JS to designate USSOCOM as Supported Commander for planning and

execution– Establish NLR as a Global Synchronization Conference topic– Initiate Commander to Commander discussions in preparation for SECDEF and

CJCS briefs– Initial dates: 7-11 Mar 11

62

63


63

BACKUP

63

64


64

USSOCOM Exercise Program USSOCOM Exercise Program Concept (U)Concept (U)

Battlestafff AOs (weekly/monthly training ) ESC/SOSTs (quarterly training) ABLE FOCUS

Outreach training teams USSOCOM support to GCC exercises (ELLIPSE, event or AOR specific) ABLE FOCUS + (GCC support to USSOCOM internal exercises)

Prioritized equivalent exercise as NLE; focused on national CT framework and USG actions Whole of government senior participation (NSC, IA, JS, OSD and GCCs) using real world intelligence Includes SLS series with senior whole of government participation

ABLE WARRIOR National Level RehearsalABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal

Internal USSOCOM TSP Training/ExercisesInternal USSOCOM TSP Training/Exercises

External GCC Battlestaff Training/Exercises External GCC Battlestaff Training/Exercises

JS/OSD and IA Senior EngagementJS/OSD and IA Senior Engagement CMX, CT BOD, J2/J3 conferences, OPS DEP, etc. AOR specific/unique event exercises (Commonwealth Games, Olympics, etc.) USG senior leader seminars, support to IA exercises, IA observes DoD exercises

65


CMX: Crisis Management Exercise NLE: National Level Exercise AF: ABLE FOCUS AW: ABLE WARRIOR ESC: Executive Steering Committee

*Timeline (U)

APR 10 JUN 10 AUG 10

AW National

Level Rehearsal

65

*Notes 2X Monthly AO / TSP training events not included Quarterly GCC/JS/OSD/IA outreach events not included

MAY 10 JUL 10

DEC 10 FEB 11

NOV 10 JAN 11

SEP 10

OCT 10 MAR 11

CMX 11 Observe NC (NLE 10)

ABLE FOCUS

CTER 1 & ESC event

CTER 2

CMX 10 & ESC

event

ESC event

EUCOM ELLIPSE

GSC

GSC

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

66

USG Interagency Working GroupCounterterrorism Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsal (CTER) Concept (U)Executive Rehearsal (CTER) Concept (U)

• The initial SLS event supporting FY 11 ABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal

• CTER 10 execution window: Sep 10 (post ABLE FOCUS and prior to Commonwealth Games)

• JS directed SLS event to ensure full participation• Senior DoD and Interagency participation is a

requirement– JS maintains lead on achieving senior participation

(Chairman’s prioritized event)

• “Real world” threat streams

66

67


67

CTER 10 Concept (U)CTER 10 Concept (U)

• Two day event• Participants: OSD/JS, Combatant Commands, NCTC and IA• Day 1: TSP/7520 DoD staff rehearsal

– Focus: Global mission analysis based on real world threat streams; rehearse CONPLAN 7520-09 DoD TSP collaboration processes and FRO refinement

– Level: O6 and below action officers– Time: Eight hours

• Day 2: DoD / IA Senior Leader Seminar (two hours)– Focus: IA and DoD senior leader CT plans and policy discussions

referencing Day 1 analysis, CMX and SLS outputs – Level: Principal/Deputies (if available), Undersecretaries,

Commanders and Directors – Time: Two hours

• Scenario: TBD based upon participants and scope67

68


68

CTER 10 Objectives (U)CTER 10 Objectives (U)

• Day 1: TSP/7520 DoD staff rehearsal – Rehearse Global Disrupt planning and CONPLAN 7520-09 DoD TSP

collaboration processes– Provide DoD and Interagency senior leadership timely and appropriate

analysis of the strategic situation and response options– Brief results to USSOCOM J3

• Day 2: DoD / IA Senior Leader Seminar (two hours)– Review Day 2 Global Mission Analysis Brief– Review/discuss current authorities, disrupt triggers and the CT Strategic

Framework (reference CMX 6 series and AW SLS outputs)– Improve TSP procedures within DoD and Interagency to ensure unity of

effort during planning, and assist in the refinement of global counter options to inform senior USG decision-making

– Discuss and provide guidance for the ABLE WARRIOR Nation Level Rehearsal planning effort

68

1 USG Interagency Working Group WJTSC 10-1 USG Interagency Working Group 31 March 2010.

Documents

Transcript of 1 USG Interagency Working Group WJTSC 10-1 USG Interagency Working Group 31 March 2010.