1 МOSCOW 2009 MODERN UNIVERSITY FOR THE HUMANITIES MODERN UNIVERSITY FOR THE HUMANITIES Higher...
-
Upload
jared-griffith -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 МOSCOW 2009 MODERN UNIVERSITY FOR THE HUMANITIES MODERN UNIVERSITY FOR THE HUMANITIES Higher...
11
ММOSCOWOSCOW 2009 2009
MODERN UNIVERSITY FOR THE HUMANITIESMODERN UNIVERSITY FOR THE HUMANITIES
Higher education in the world countries: Higher education in the world countries:
the analysis of international statistics and the the analysis of international statistics and the
results of the global ratings in educationresults of the global ratings in education
O. Karpenko, M. Bershadskaya, Y.VoznesenskayaO. Karpenko, M. Bershadskaya, Y.Voznesenskaya
22
TertiaryTertiary Attainment of PopulationAttainment of Population with with regard to the Scale regard to the Scale FactorFactor
BoundaryBoundary Conditions for Conditions for Selection of Leading CountriesSelection of Leading Countries
index of education, describing the index of education, describing the educational potential of the educational potential of the populationpopulation – – nono less thanless than 0,9 0,955
the ratio of 25-to-64-year-olds with the ratio of 25-to-64-year-olds with tertiary education (level 5A/6)tertiary education (level 5A/6)– – at at least least 15% 15%
number ofnumber of university students university students (5A/6) (5A/6) – – nono less thanless than
0,5 0,5 millionmillion
share ofshare of university students university students (5A/6) (5A/6) in population in population – – nono less thanless than 2% 2%
12 12 leadingleading--countriescountries(only 12 countries out 191 world (only 12 countries out 191 world countries meet these requirements) countries meet these requirements)
USAUSARussiaRussiaJapanJapanKoreaKoreaGermanyGermanyGreat BritainGreat BritainFranceFranceSpainSpainCanadaCanadaAustraliaAustraliaNetherlandsNetherlandsPolandPoland
33
TERTIARY ATTAINMENT OF POPULAITION
Fig.1 Ratio of 25-to-64-year-olds with tertiary education (level 5A/6) – 2006Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators – 2008 Edition, table A1.3a
44
Fig.2 Distribution of world students population by countries – 2007
Global Education Digest 2009. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.Montreal,2009, table 8
TERTIARY ATTAINMENT OF POPULAITION
55
TERTIARY ATTAINMENT OF POPULAITION
Fig.3Fig.3 Share of Share of university students in population – 2007Calculation by data:Calculation by data: 1) 1) Global Education Digest 2009. UNESCO Institute for
Statistics.Montreal,2009,table 8 2) Russia and the world countries. 2009. P. 361
66
Priorities areas of Education DevelopmentPriorities areas of Education Development
The export of education services The export of education services as a as a reflection of the existing national education system reflection of the existing national education system reputation in the international community reputation in the international community
World university ratingsWorld university ratings enabling the enabling the evaluation of a national tertiary education system evaluation of a national tertiary education system according to integral universitiesaccording to integral universities
The international study of education The international study of education quality PISAquality PISA (Program for International Student (Program for International Student Assessment)Assessment) – shows a state of the secondary – shows a state of the secondary school education which is the tertiary education school education which is the tertiary education foundationfoundation
Accessibility and affordability of tertiary Accessibility and affordability of tertiary educationeducation
The scope of Distance Education The scope of Distance Education developmentdevelopment
Only four countries are added to the Only four countries are added to the above mentioned above mentioned 12 12 leading countriesleading countries::
India and ChinaIndia and China,, coming out to the forefront due to the number coming out to the forefront due to the number of students in higher education, students of students in higher education, students growth dynamics and distance education growth dynamics and distance education developmentdevelopment
FinlandFinland ,, leading in three ratings: the quality ofleading in three ratings: the quality of secondary education PISA-2006, the secondary education PISA-2006, the accessibility and affordability of higher accessibility and affordability of higher
education(2nd place);education(2nd place); SwedenSweden - -
the leader in affordability of higher the leader in affordability of higher educationeducation
77
EXPORT OF EDUCATIONEXPORT OF EDUCATION
Fig.4 Distribution of foreign students in host countries (in thousands) Fig.4 Distribution of foreign students in host countries (in thousands) Global Education Digest 2009. UNESCO Institute for
Statistics.Montreal,2009, table 9
88
Global rankings of educational opportunities, Global rankings of educational opportunities, (proposed by Canadian researchers(proposed by Canadian researchers A. Usher, A. Cervenan ) are based on the separation of the concepts of A. Usher, A. Cervenan ) are based on the separation of the concepts of accessibility of tertiary education and its affordability (ability for payment). accessibility of tertiary education and its affordability (ability for payment). Fig.5-7 show the results of the authors project and an Fig.5-7 show the results of the authors project and an approximateapproximate estimate of estimate of Russia in these rankings: Russia in these rankings:
Japan
New Zealand
United Kingdom
USA
Australia
CanadaItaly
France
Germany
AustriaRussia
Belgium FrenchIreland
Belgium Flemish
NetherlandsFinland
Sw eden
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Ranking
Austria
Belgium
RussiaGermany
Italy
Sw edenFrance
Ireland
AustraliaCanada
USAUnited
Ringdom
Finland
Netherland
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14Ranking
Fig.6Fig.6 Place in a ranking on the sum of the weighed values of the indicators
characterizing the accessibility of tertiary education;
Fig.5Fig.5 Place in a ranking on the sum of the weighed values of the indicators characterizing the affordability (ability for payment) of tertiary
education;
Fig.7.. The results of the global rankings on accessibility and affordability of tertiary education.
99
World university rankings
159
42
4031
2322
34
21
18
15121198 87
7766 6
USA-159 United Kngdom-42 Germany-40
Japan-31 France-23 Italy-22
Canada-21 China-18 Australia-15
Netherlands-12 Sw eden-11 Spain-9
Sw itzerland-8 Korea-8 Belgium-7
Austria-7 Taiw an-7 Israel-6
Finland-6 Brazil-6 other-34
OTHER:Hong Kong-5, New Zealand-5,Denmark-4, Norw ay-4, Ireland-3, South Africa-3, Greece-2, India-2,Russia-2, Singapore-2, Argentiina-1,Mexico-1
ARWU Top 500, 200832 countries, 492 universities
444
33
58
21
30
121111
109
76
5
3
USA-58 Unted Kingdom-30 Canada-12
Germany-11 Netherlands-11 Japan-10
Australia-9 Sw itzerland-7 China-6
Belgium-5 France-4 Sw eden-4
Hong Kong-4 Israel-3 Korea-3
New Zealand-3 other-21
Rankng "Times" Top 200, 2008 33 countries, 201 universities
OTHER: Denmark-2, India-2, Ireland-2, Singapore-2, Argentina-1, Austra-1, Brasil-1, Finland-1, Greece-1, Italy-1, Mexico-1, Norw ay-1, Russia-1, South Africa-1, Spain-1, Thailand-1, Taiw an-1
Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU).
World University Rankings of Times Higher Education Supplement
F ig.8 Academic Ranking of World
Universities -2008. http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm
Fig.9 Times Higher Education Supplement http://www.thes.co.uk/
1010
Fig.10 Leading countries by the number of universities among the top 5000 world universities
Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. http://www.webometrics.info/index.html
Fig.11. Distribution of the top 170 Russian Universities in the federal districts.
O.Karpenko, M.Bershadskaya,Y.Voznesenskaya. Openness and accessibility of information on the university: results of international ranking of the universities’ web-sites. Workshop on computer science and information technologies CSIT’2009, Crete, Greece, 2009.
Webometrics Ranking of World Universities
1111
Results of international research of school education qualityResults of international research of school education quality Results PISA (Programme for international student assessment) considered in a Results PISA (Programme for international student assessment) considered in a context of higher education, have shown the backlog of some countries that have so far context of higher education, have shown the backlog of some countries that have so far been recognized leaders in education (USA, Russia, Spain, France, Germany) – been recognized leaders in education (USA, Russia, Spain, France, Germany) – fig.12 fig.12
454
434
410
498503
511516
515
531
525 495
489
488527534
563
542
479473
349
322
522
424412
390393
386
382
300
350
400
450
500
550
600Finland-563 Hong Kong-542 Canada-534Taiwan-532 Estonia-531 Japan-531
New Zealand-530 Australia-527 Netherlands-525Liechtenstein-522 Korea-522 Slov enia-519
Germany -516 United Kingdom-515 Czech Republic-513Switzerland-512 Macao-511 Austria-511Belgium-510 Ireland-508 Hungary -504
Sweden-503 Poland-498 Denmark-496France-495 Croatia-493 Iceland-491
Latv ia-490 USA-489 Slov akia-488Spain-488 Lithuania-488 Norway -487Luxembourg-486 Russia-479 Italy -475
Portugal-474 Greece-473 Israel-454Chili-438 Serbia-436 Bulgaria-434Uruguay -428 Turkey -424 Jordan-422
Thailand-421 Romania-418 Montenegro-412Mexico-410 Indonesia-393 Argentina-391
Brasil-490 Colombia-388 Tunisia-386Azerbaijan-382 Qatar-349 Kirghizia-322
Fig.12 Average scores of the countries in the priority area of research PISA-2006 PISA-2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrows World
1212
..Consideration of the particularities of the differentiations in the quality of school education within the country reveals its "narrow" places and clearly demonstrates the need for greater openness and accessibility of education to the general population regardless of place of residence – fig.13, 14
402
433 440 457 469
449
469 477487 499
452
466 482 491 508
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Village, f arm
with the
population up
to 3000
Settlement
with the
population
f rom 3000 up
to 15000
City with the
population
f rom 15000
up to 100000
City with the
population
f rom 100
thousand up
to 1 million
City with the
population
more than 1
million
ReadingMathematicsScience
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
Reading
Mathematics
Science
Fig.13 The results of American students of different origins: а) average scores, b) deviation from the average score in OECD countries - zero point - the level of OECD countriesа)
b)
Fig.14. The results of Russian students depending on their place of residence: а) average scores; b) deviation from the average score in OECD countries).
а) b)
1313
The level of development of distance education based on Information Communication Technologies (ICT)
7,2%
6%
2%1,7%
0,5% 0,4%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8%
mega-universities
developing countries
India China Europe USA
developing contries 84%
8 336 000 mega-university students
11
11
1
1
1
11
1 1 1 1 2
2
2
5
India-5 China-2Thailand-2 USA-2Turkey -1 Bangladesh-1Pakistan-1 Indonesia-1Japan-1 Korea-1Unted Kingdom-1 South Af rica-1Russia-1 France-1Iran-1 Spain-1Canada-1
183
2718
2401
884
611
541
456
433
400
250
196
100120
204
India-2718 China-2401Turkey-884 Thaland-611USA-541 Pakistan-456Bangladesh-433 Indonesia-400South Africa-250 United Kingdom-204Korea-196 Russia-183Iran-183 Spain-180France-120 Canada-100Japan-100
Fig.15 Share of mega-university students in total number of students in the world
Fig.16. The role of developing countries in mega-universities
Fig.17.Fig.17. Number of Number of mega-universitiesmega-universities
Fig.18. Number of mega-university students (thousands)
1414
CountryCountry II IIII IIIIII IVIV VV VIVI VIIVII VIIIVIII IXIX XX XIXI
AustraliaAustralia 1-51-5 3-53-5 44 22
United KingdomUnited Kingdom 22 22 33 33
GermanyGermany 55 44 55
NetherlandsNetherlands 1-51-5 22 33 11
IndiaIndia -- -- 22 11
SpainSpain 1-51-5 55
CanadaCanada 1-51-5 3-53-5 22 5-65-6 55 44
ChinaChina -- -- 11-2-2 22
KoreaKorea 3-53-5 33
PolandPoland 22 -- --
RussiaRussia 44 33 11 44 -- --
USAUSA 11 1-21-2 44 44 11 11 -- 44 44 --
FinlandFinland 1-51-5 11 55 22 22 11
FranceFrance 33 5-65-6
SwedenSweden 55 11
JapanJapan 33 33 33 55
Place among 16 countries-leaders on indicators of system of tertiary educationPlace among 16 countries-leaders on indicators of system of tertiary educationI – index of education, II – the ratio of adults with tertiary education (level, 5A/6). III – number of university students , IV – share of university students in population , V – the ratio of 25-to-64-year-olds with tertiary education (level 5A/5B/6), VI – number of foreign students in host countries, VII – number of national universities among the top world universities (according to cumulative results of three international rating – ARWU, Times and Webometrics), VIII – affordability of tertiary education, IX – accessibility of tertiary education, X – the level of development of distance education , XI -Results of international research of school education quality (according to cumulative results of PISA-2006)
1515
Our address:Our address:
http://www.muh.ruhttp://www.muh.ru
Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention