1- mutahir tunio

21
Five - years Outcomes of Concurrent Chemoradiation in Saudi Women with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Mutahir Ali Tunio, FCPS (Rad. Onc) Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh

Transcript of 1- mutahir tunio

Five-years Outcomes of Concurrent Chemoradiationin Saudi Women with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Mutahir Ali Tunio, FCPS (Rad. Onc)Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center

King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh

0 10 20 30 40 50Breast

ThyroidColorectal

NHLOvaryCervix

LeukemiaUterine

StomachKidney

SkinCNS

Hodgkin LOthers

Saudi Cancer Registry-2009 (30-44 years)

%

Background:

GOG-04GOG-

85/SWOG 8695

GOG-120 GOG-165 GOG-191

Background:

RT alone Vs. RT + Hydroxyurea

RT + Hydroxyurea Vs. RT + 5-FU/cisplatin

RT + 5FU/cisplatin Vs. RT + weekly cisplatin Vs. RT + Hydroxyurea

RT + weekly cisplatin Vs. RT + 5-FU protracted

Randomized trials of concurrent chemo-radiation therapy for locallyadvanced cervical cancer

RT + weekly cisplatin Vs. RT + weekly cisplatin/EPO

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014

Ann Saudi Med 2013; 33(4): 327-333

Aim:

To evaluate long-term treatment outcomes and toxicity profile ofcombined Chemoradiation in Saudi women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria –

h/o Abdominopelvic RT

all patients

metastatic

h/o Hysterectomy/RP surgery

IIB-IVA; ECOG 0-2; CCRT study population

Materials and methods –

1. King Khalid Hospital(17.9%)

2. NGH(30.9%)

3. King Fahad Medical City

(51.2%)

incomplete data/Rx

IRB

Appr

oval

(200

7-20

12)

Materials and methods –Treatment and follow-up

IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII/III

HDR HDR HDR1st

year

2nd

year

3rd

year

4th

year

5th

year

Follow-upPelvic exams; Pap

smear, Imaging

21 Gy @ 7 Gy x 3

Cisplatin 40 mg/m2

weekly

WK1 WK2 WK3 WK4 WK5 WK6-7

EBRT: 50.4 - 54.0 Gy/28-33 # HDR-BT

Weekly follow up; symptoms, weight, pelvic exams; CBC, electrolytes,

RT techniques –

Materials and methods –

Statistical analysis

Survival probabilities were determined by Kaplan-Meier, Log rank; Student’s unpaired t test was used to determine the difference between groups; p value <0.05 was considered significant

EndpointsPrimary: Locoregional Control

(defined as duration between the completion of CCRT and the date of documented recurrence within irradiated fields

Secondary: Distant control; disease free survival; overall survival and toxicity profile

Data collection

Demographics; Tumor characteristics; treatment details; Follow-up; toxicity (NCI-CTC and RTOG); outcomes

Results –

Results –

• Median follow up duration was 5 years (range: 0.8-5.5)

• Mean duration of RT was 56 days (range:48-58)

Results – Toxicity

Results – Locoregional Failure

L1L2L3L4L5

T12

FOLLOW UP IN MONTHS6050403020100

% L

OCOR

EGIO

NAL

CONT

ROL

1.0.9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1

0.0

Results – Locoregional Control

84.2%

FOLLOW UP IN MONTHS6050403020100%

DIS

TANT

MET

ASTA

TIC

CONT

ROL 1.0

.9

.8

.7

.6

.5

.4

.3

.2

.10.0

Results – Distant Metastasis Control

78.5%

FOLLOW UP IN MONTHS6050403020100

% O

VERA

LL S

URVI

VAL

1.0.9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1

0.0

Results – Overall Survival

64.5%(47 pts alive of analysis)

Subgroup No. of Patients

Hazard Ratio

Age Age ≤ 50 years 33Age > 50 years 41

Co-morbidities Yes 30No 44

FIGO IIB 49> IIB 25

Nodal disease Yes 45No 29

Hemoglobulin < 10 gm/dL 5> 10 gm/dL 69

Histology Adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous

7

Squamous 67Treatment duration < 54 days 65

> 54 days 9Overall 74

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Results –Locoregional Control Prognostic factors

Presenter
Presentation Notes

Discussion – Merits

2

3

4

Good sample size1

Long follow-up duration

Moderate doses of weekly cisplatin

Better RT techniques

5 Multidisciplinary approach

Discussion – Limitations

2

3

4

Retrospective 1

Sampling bias

Majority of Cohort with DM and HTN

Lead time bias

5 Lack of data on QoL

Outcomes in agreement

with international

data

Further results of IMRT are

warranted

Multidisciplinary approach

High No:

DM and HTN warrants public awareness

Conclusions –

LARC warrants screening

campaign in the Kingdom

Acknowledgement

• Dr. Mushabbab AlAsiri, for his constant support and encouraging forthis research

• Dr. Yasser Bayoumi, Dr. Abdulrehman AlHadab, Dr. Eyad AlSaeed, Dr.A. Amro, Mohannad Arifi (Student KSU), Radiation Oncology-KFMC,Gynecology Oncology team-KFMC and our patients for giving usopportunity to present this study in front of you

• Scientific Chair of Prof. Abdullah Hussain Basalamah for GYN Cancer;for giving the platform to present this study

Thank you ??