1 Language Technology for Customer Relations John Nerbonne Informatiekunde, Groningen...
-
Upload
jade-hopkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Language Technology for Customer Relations John Nerbonne Informatiekunde, Groningen...
1
Language Technology for Customer Relations
John Nerbonne
Informatiekunde, Groningen
Computer-Mediated Communication
Consumenten Contacten in 2005
BSC Seminar, Amsterdam
Oct. 12, 2000
2
Language Technology
• What is language technology?• What are applications of LT?• Will voices replace screens? • How to get it right• Opportunities for consumer relations
3
Well-known LT applications
• Spell checkers– right/wrong, nearest match, variant(s)
• Rough translation tools (AltaVista)
• Postbank’s stock quotations (telephone)
• “Smart” search engines– seek: Kennedy’s daughter
– find: the daughter of J.F.Kennedy, Kennedy’s children, etc.
4
Language Technology Tasks
• recognize, analyze words, phrases
• index, search, sort, retrieve, store texts
• find terminology, person/place names
• align translations, correspondences
• organize documentation for maintenance, versions, multilingualism
5
Potential Applications
Mode Task Medium/Locale
SpeechHandwritingPrintMultimodal
UnderstandCorrectTranslateIndex,SearchTeach
TelephoneCar, SMS, PCToys, PDAFactory Floor
6
Problems with LT
• Language: ambiguous, volatile, sequential– `Don’t stop!’ vs. `Don’t! Stop!’ – Wreck a Nice Beach vs. Recognize Speech– Spoken language quickly fades, is forgotten– Long lists: OK to scan visually, not to hear
• LT is young– OVIS 83% of conversations successful
7
Invest in airlines, or, Why face-to-face won’t go away
• High bandwidth
• Social (vs. information) factors:– Shared experience, common space – Inimitable presence of the body– “Bonding”– Showing commitment
8
Thinking about LT applications
• Compare LT vs. human• Apply where miss is disastrous • Avoid
– one-time lookups– “general intelligence” – unrestricted language (Annual
Reports, newspapers, patents)
• Cost/benefit analysis• Apply w. back-up• Seek domain
– repeated info. needs – simple logic– limited linguistics
Do ’s Don’t ’s
9
Near-term Opportunities • away from PC
– mobile phone, pay phone, SMS
• complex PC navigation– users won’t tolerate menu after menu,..
• “hands-busy” situations– driving, examining, factory floor
• assistance to handicapped
10
Emerging Topics
• Flexible delivery– speech, SMS, or
full-screen– via XML
• Support for human communication
11
Getting it Right
• New technologies not easy– Bar-code readers (15 year introduction)– Video recorders (1 competent user/family)– Automatic tellers (banks) (90%)– Stoves, washers, dryers, dishwashers,
answering machines,...
• Suchman’s study for Xerox– the green button
12
Myths of Interface Design
• Interfaces should allow max. functionality -- “anything goes”– text editors that allow letters
• Wysiwyg is (always) superior– “What you see is what you get”– Problem: documents, graphics for diff. media?
• “Do what I mean, not what I say.”– example problem: overeager spell-checkers
off line
13
Glosser
• help with French
– endings (grammar)
– dictionary access
– other examples
– word pronunciation
• web version
– www.let.rug.nl/alfa/• “projects”
14
Early Glosser Interface• General mouse control
– Users (tried to) look up word pieces– Solution: make mouse sensitive to words
• First encouraged “overuse”– Some words looked up several times– Solution: remind users
• Users took notes!– Missed “margins” to write in– Solution: allow “gloss” between lines
15
Early NLP Interfaces (pre-OVIS)
• Competition with graphics– Windows Excel vs. NLP– Solution: focus on other delivery (phone)
• Based on grammar-book language– When’s the train to Zwolle, ah Meppen?– Solution: base grammar on recorded
interaction
16
Relevant Developments
• Informatiekunde, RuG– LT, Web technology
• Computer-Mediated Communication– cooperative program IK, Communicatie- en
Informatiewetenschappen, RuG– 6-month work period in study
17
LT for Customer Contact
• Contact needs automation
• LT can support applications now– modest, repetitive, frequently needed
• Repeat until right– Design, implement & evaluate in use