1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

16
GODAE OceanView / CLIVAR GSOP Technical Workshop on Observing System Evaluation and Inter-comparisons, 13-17 June 2011, UCSC A Sensitivity Study of Short-Range Forecasts over the Atlantic METAREA V with HYCOM and the Cooper and Haines Scheme Using Different Sea Surface Heights Jean Oliveira 1 , João Alvarenga 1 , Raquel Mello 1 , Ana Freitas 1 , Lucimara Russo 1 , Clemente Tanajura 2 1 Brazilian Navy Center of Hydrography (CHM), Brazil 2 Institute of Physics, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Brazil Oceanographic Modeling and Observation Network (REMO) www.rederemo.org

description

GODAE OceanView / CLIVAR GSOP Technical Workshop on Observing System Evaluation and Inter-comparisons, 13-17 June 2011, UCSC A Sensitivity Study of Short-Range Forecasts over the Atlantic METAREA V with HYCOM and the Cooper and Haines Scheme Using Different Sea Surface Heights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

Page 1: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

GODAE OceanView / CLIVAR GSOP Technical Workshop on Observing System Evaluation and Inter-comparisons, 13-17 June 2011, UCSC

A Sensitivity Study of Short-Range Forecasts over the Atlantic METAREA V with HYCOM and the Cooper and Haines Scheme Using

Different Sea Surface Heights

Jean Oliveira1, João Alvarenga1, Raquel Mello1, Ana Freitas1, Lucimara Russo1 , Clemente Tanajura2

1 Brazilian Navy Center of Hydrography (CHM), Brazil2Institute of Physics, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Brazil

Oceanographic Modeling and Observation Network (REMO)www.rederemo.org

Page 2: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

1. Introduction

2. Goals

3. Methodology

4. Results

5. Other Results

6. Conclusions

Outline

Page 3: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

• REMO is a research group in physical oceanography and operational oceanography established in January 2008

• The members are researchers and students from four Brazilian universities, the Brazilian Navy and the PETROBRAS research center CENPES

1. Introduction

Page 4: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

1. Introduction (cont.)

- Pre-operational short-range ocean forecasts with HYCOM (7 days) and ROMS (3 days) using NCEP GFS forcing since Oct ober 2009

- Operational forecasts with HYCOM in the Brazilian Navy CHM with the Cooper & Haines scheme (1996) (C&H) since February 2010

HYCOM 1/4o 21L HYCOM 1/12o 21L ROMS 5-13 km 32L

Page 5: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

2. Goals - Evaluate HYCOM 1/12o Forecasts

- Investigate the behavior of the model predictability along time

- Investigate the model sensitivity to different initial conditions

- Develop routines to validate model simulations and forecasts according to GODAE OceanView standards

3. Methodology - Construct initial condition with u, v, T and S from the HYCOM+NCODA

system on 00Z 1 Feb 2010 available in z-coordinates at www.hycom.org

- 7-day forecasts from 1 Feb 2010 until 31 Mar 2010 using GFS forcing

- HYCOM 1/4o : initial condition from C&H with the 24 h forecast as background and SSH from HYCOM+NCODA

- HYCOM 1/12o nested in the HYCOM 1/4o : initial condition from C&H with the 24 h forecast as background and SSH from

HYCOM+NCODA (NRL), Mercator-océan (MERCATOR) and SSH analysis (ALONG_TRACK)

Page 6: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

3. Methodology (cont.)

- SSH analyses were performed daily with (filtered) along-track SSH anomalies (SSHA) from Jason-1 and Jason-2 obtained from AVISO.

- OI was employed to assimilate SSHA according to Ezer & Mellor (1997)

- The background SSHA was obtained from

- The analysis was calculated from

SSHSSHSSHA bb model mean

RH(HBBH=K ' 1)

222 /exp),( LrjiB iji

)SSHAHK(Y+SSHA=SSHA bba )(

R is diagonal with constant values equal to (0.02 m)2

L = 170 km

is the SSHA model variance at point i

is the distance between point s i and j222 )()( jijiij yyxxr

2i

Page 7: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

3. Methodology (cont.)

- 747 Argo profilers with T-S were used to evaluate the forecasts

- Only the 24 h forecasts were investigated

- Temperature and salinity from Argo and model were interpolated to the standard Levitus vertical levels

Argo profilers1 Feb - 31 Mar 2010

Page 8: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

4. Results

- NRL = C&H with HYCOM+NCODA

- ALONG_TRACK = C&H with SSHA analysis

- MERCATOR = C&H with Mercator-Océan 1/4º SSH

Control

Argo

Mean Temperature Profile Mean Salinity Profile

Experiments

Control

Argo

Experiments

Page 9: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

- Standard deviations (Std) of the difference between the forescast and ARGO data for temperature and salinity were calculated

- Smallest values were obtained for the NRL followed by the CONTROL , ALONG_TRACK and MERCATOR experiments

4. Results (cont.)

Mean Temperature and Std (ΔT) Mean Salinity and Std (ΔS)0.2oC < Std (ΔT) < 2.4oC 0.2oC < Std (ΔT) < 2.4oC

Argo

Argo

NRL (dashed)

NRL (dashed)

Page 10: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

4. Results (cont.)

0 – 2000 m

0 – 100 m 125 – 800 m

Taylor Diagrams for Temperature

A – ARGOB – NRL C – ALONG_TRACKD – MERCATORE – CONTROL

Page 11: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

4. Results (cont.)

0 – 2000 m

0 – 100 m 125 – 800 m

Taylor Diagrams for Temperature

A – ARGOB – NRL C – ALONG_TRACKD – MERCATORE – CONTROL

Page 12: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

4. Results (cont.)

0 – 2000 m

125 – 800 m0 – 100 m

Taylor Diagrams for Salinity

A – ARGOB – NRL C – ALONG_TRACKD – MERCATORE – CONTROL

Page 13: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

16/09/10

5. Other results

- Initial condition: “interpolated” HYCOM+NCODA fields available in z-coordinate in www.hycom.org on 00Z 1 Jan 2011

- 7-day (168 h) Forecasts performed daily with Cooper and Haines, SSH from HYCOM+NCODA

- NCEP GFS forcing

Forecast minus PIRATA (8oS. 30oW) Forecast minus PIRATA (19oS. 34oW)

20 m 20 m300 m

300 m

100 m

100 m

Solid lines = 24 h forecastDashed lines = 168 h forecast

Tem

p.

Dif

fere

nce

(o

C)

Tem

p.

Dif

fere

nce

(o

C)

Leonardo Lima; Luiz Gavaza

Page 14: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

16/09/10

5. Other results (cont.)

- Background: “interpolated” HYCOM+NCODA fields available in z-coordinate in www.hycom.org on 00Z 1 Jan 2011

- Bergthorsson and Doos analysis with 19 profiles of T and S from Argo T and S data from surface to 2000 m performed in the Levitus z-levels;

- Application of Cooper and Haines with SSH from HYCOM+NCODA

Davi Mingac; Luiz Gavaza

BackgroundBackground

Analysis+C&H

Analysis

RMSE for Temperature (oC) RMSE for Salinity (PSU)

Dep

th (

m)

Analysis+C&H

Analysis

Page 15: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

16/09/10

6. Conclusions- The system HYCOM 1/12o – initialized with “interpolated”

HYCOM+NCODA fields on 1 Feb 2010 – restrained daily by Cooper and Haines with HYCOM+NCODA SSH produces good agreement with Argo data;

- When assimilation of AVISO along-track SSHA data was employed, similar (worse) results were obtained;

- The use of SSH from Mercator-Océan produced similar results to the control run without Cooper and Haines;

- In another forecast experiment (from 1 Jan 2011 to 31 Mar 2011) the 24h forecasts for T with respect to PIRATA buoys close to Brazil were very similar to the 168h forecasts

- The analysis of vertical profiles of T and S from Argo performed in z-coordinates were substantially modified by Cooper and Haines;

- An OI scheme to assimilate synthetic T(z) and ρ(z) is under evaluation and a multivariate OI system is being pursued to jointly assimilate SSHA, SST, T(z) and layer thickness.

Page 16: 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Other Results 6. Conclusions

Thanks!