1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner...

16
1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner [email protected]

Transcript of 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner...

Page 1: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

1

HsinChu December 5, 2012

ITRS - YE ITWG

Conference in HsinChuDecember 5, 2012

Lothar Pfitzner

[email protected]

Page 2: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

2

HsinChu December 5, 2012

Scope of Yield Enhancement• Aspects

– Manufacturing of integrated semiconductor devices: numerous processing steps building the 3D structure of the chip (e.g. 9 Cu and low –k interconnect layers for 32 nm)

– Yield: percentage of operating chips at the end of the manufacturing process

• Components– Determination and control of

contamination– Inspection of structures and critical

dimensions– Model to predict and calculate yield

based on historic contamination levels (particulate and metals) and defects (failures)

– Determination of kill ratios: Correlation between defects and yield

A bird’s-eye view of 0.128µm2 FinFET SRAM cells (post silicide formation)Toschiba,

Gordon Moore: “There is no fundamental obstacle to achieving device yields of 100%.”

(Electronics, 38 (8), 1965)

45 nm ramp production was the fastestPresented by Mark Bohr (Intel) 02/2009

Page 3: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

3

HsinChu December 5, 2012

Example: Inspection for ‘More than Moore’

Applications

‘More Moore’ and ‘More than Moore’ technologies

– power electronics– mechatronics – MEMS applications – packaging and assembly – 3 D integration

Laboratory scale inspection setup fulfilling requirements of low cost components and large area inspection (4 mm *4 mm field of view at µm resolution) (example for 3D integration, EC & BMBF funded project JEMSIP3D under contract ENIAC Call 2008 / 120016)

Test layout routing lines (CEA Leti)

Page 4: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

4

HsinChu December 5, 2012

Contamination Analysis for Manufacturing Control

• Drivers– ultra clean manufacturing– unintended

contamination of layers– dimensional, structural

and compositional information

– depth resolved quantification

– non-volatile organic surface contamination

• Analytical Techniques for Manufacturing Control

– x-ray metrology– GCMS– TBD

HEPA Filter for contamination free manufacturing (source wikipedia)

Elemental analysis of contamination with TXRF

Elemental depth profiling with GIXRF

For metals, Grazing Incidence X-Ray Fluorescence (GIXRF) could be a possible solution providing dimensional quantification and qualification of surface near elemental contamination.

Page 5: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

5

HsinChu December 5, 2012

Objectives of Yield Enhancement• collect defect data

– tools for inspection and root cause analysis

– automated defect classification and filtering

– inspection strategy

• yield management– software– objective: to correlate data

and find excursions– predict yield

• defect data excursions– define specs– procedure for clarification

processmodule 1

processmodule 2

processmodule k

wafer wafer wafer1

2k

manufacturing

inspection and collection of data

review, characterization, metrology

defect densities

defect classification

Page 6: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

6

HsinChu December 5, 2012

Defects and Failure Mechanisms

• processes: litho, etch thin film implantation, planarization, cleaning,…

• faults and problems: defects as e.g. particles, flatness, layer properties, patterns, dimensions

• challenges – yield and defect map in 2 D– root cause analysis

requires 3 D– requires fast and non-

destructive inspection (defect density) and metrology (root cause analysis) for 2D and 3D structures CIA

– requires preventive defect and contamination control WECC

– model, predict and forecast yield

n-well p-well

n

Via

p

crack

shortopen

contamination

p+

particle

COP

layer thickness

Metal 1

Metal 2

overlay

p

Interconnects

n+

particle

ESD Damage

Si crystal: stacking faults, contamination, stress, COP (crystal originating particles), epi defects

interfaces: roughness, state density, charges

Page 7: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

7

HsinChu December 5, 2012

Organization of the Chapter 2012

• Chair: Lothar Pfitzner (Fraunhofer IISB) Co-Chair: Dilip Patel (ISMI)

• Difficult Challenges• Table YE 2

• Technology Requirements and Potential Solutions- Wafer Environment Contamination Control (WECC)

• Chair: Kevin Pate (Intel) – USA, Andreas Neuber (AMAT) - Europe

• Table YE 3, YE 4, YE 4a - Characterization, Inspection & Analysis (CIA)

• Co-Chair: H. Nagaishi and I. Thurner – Europe• Table, YE 5, YE 6, YE 7

- Yield Learning (YL – not active in 2012)• Chair: N.N.; Contributor defined by AMAT

- Yield Model and Defect Budget (YMDB – not active in 2011 and 2012)

• Chair: N.N.

Page 8: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

8

HsinChu December 5, 2012

2012 YE ITWG Contributors (please update)Europe

Lothar Pfitzner ( chair, Fraunhofer IISB )Andreas Neuber ( WECC, AMAT )Sabrina Anger (CIA, Fraunhofer IISB)Yannick Borde ( WECC, ST Crolles )Jan Cavelaars ( CIA, NXP )Arnaud Favre ( WECC, Adixen )Giuseppe Fazio ( Micron )Francois Finck ( CIA, ST )Astrid Gettel ( WECC, GLOBALFOUNDRIES )Mathias Haeuser ( CIA, Infineon )Fontaine Herve (CEA)Christoph Hocke ( WECC, Infineon TechnologiesFrancesca Illuzzi ( WECC, Micron )Hans Jansen ( WECC, ASML )Jost Kames ( WECC, artemis control AG )Barry Kennedy ( CIA, Intel )Jens Mueller (MWGroup)Andreas Nutsch ( CIA, PTB)Dieter Rathei ( CIA, DR Yield )Ines Thurner ( CIA, CONVANIT )Hubert Winzig ( WECC, Infineon )

JapanYoshimi Shiramizu ( WECC, co-chair, Renesas )Takashi Futatsuki ( WECC, Organo )Teruyuki Hayashi ( WECC, TEL )Masahiko Ikeno ( CIA, Hitachi High-Technologies )Katsunobu Kitami ( WECC, Kurita )Kaoru Kondoh ( WECC, Rion )Naoki Kotani (CIA, Panasonic )Sumio Kuwabara (CIA, STARC)Yasuhiko Matsumoto ( WECC, Rohm )Fumio Mizuno ( WECC, MEISEI University )Hiroshi Nagaishi ( CIA, Renesas )Kazuo Nishihagi ( WECC, HORIBA )Koichiro Saga ( WECC, SONY )Isamu Sugiyama ( WECC, NOMURA )Makiko Tamaoki (Toshiba)Yoshitaka Tatsumoto ( CIA, Lasertec )Hiroshi Tomita ( WECC, Toshiba )Takahiro Tsuchiya ( CIA, Fujitsu semiconductor )Ken Tsugane ( WECC, HITACHI )

KoreaYoung Jeong Kim ( Samsung)

Thank youvery much!

Singapore

Guillaume Gallet ( WECC, Camfil)Paul Tan WECC)

TaiwanWai-Ming Choi ( Entegris)Ychuang Huang (TSMC)Victor Liang (TSMC)Ray Yang (UMC)Mao-Hsiang Yen (Winbond)

United States

Scott Anderson ( ,, Balazs-AirLiquide )Dwight Beal ( WECC, PMS )David Blackford ( WECC, Fluid Measurement Technologies )Dilip Patel ( YE co-chair, ISMI )Marc Camenzind ( WECC, Balazs-AirLiquide )Jeff Chapman ( WECC, IBM )John DeGenova ( WECC, Texas Instruments )Dan Fuchs ( WECC, Air Liquide)Rick Godec ( WECC, Ionics Instruments )Barry Gotlinsky ( WECC, Pall )Jeff Hanson ( WECC, Texas Instruments )Keith Kerwin ( WECC, TI )Suhas Ketkar ( WECC, APCI )John Kurowski ( WECC, IBM )Bob Latimer ( WECC, Hach )Slava Libman ( WECC, Air Liquide - Balazs Nanoanalysis )Chris Muller ( WECC, Purafil, Inc. )Kevin Pate ( WECC, Intel )Larry Rabellino ( WECC, SAES )Rich Riley ( WECC, Intel )David Roberts ( WECC, Nantero )Biswanath Roy ( WECC, Pall )Tony Schleisman ( WECC, Air Liquide )Drew Sinha ( WECC, Siltronic )Terry Stange ( WECC, Hach Ultra Analytics )Dan Wilcox ( WECC, Replipoint Technologies )Milton Goldwin ( CIA, ISMI )Charley Dobson ( WECC, TI )Asad Haider ( WECC, TI )Ruben Pessina ( WECC, TI )William Moore ( WECC, IBM )Rushikesh Matkar ( WECC, Intel )Ravi Laxman ( WECC, Air Liquide )Hubert Chu ( WECC, AMAT )Robert Clark ( WECC, TEL )

Status 12/2012

Page 9: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

9

HsinChu December 5, 2012

2013 Key Challenges The Yield Enhancement community is challenged by the following topics:

• Near Term (2013-2018)

– Detection and Identification of Small Yield Limiting Defects from Nuisance - It is a challenge to detect multiple killer defects and to differentiate them simultaneously at high capture rates, low cost of ownership and high throughput. Furthermore, it is a dare to identify yield relevant defects under a vast amount of nuisance and false defects.

– Process Stability vs. Absolute Contamination Level – This includes the correlation to yield test structures, methods and data that are needed for correlating defects caused by wafer environment and handling to yield. This requires determination of control limits for gases, chemicals, air, precursors, ultrapure water and substrate surface cleanliness.

– Detection of organic contamination on surfaces – The detection and speciation of nonvolatile organics on surfaces is currently not possible in the fab. There is no laboratory scale instrumentation available.

Page 10: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

10

HsinChu December 5, 2012

2013 Key Challenges The Yield Enhancement community is challenged by the following topics:• Long Term (2019-2026)

– Next Generation Inspection - As bright field detection in the far-field loses its ability to discriminate defects of interest, it has become necessary to explore new alternative technologies that can meet inspection requirements beyond 13 nm node. Several techniques should be given consideration as potential candidates for inspection: high speed scanning probe microscopy, near-field scanning optical microscopy, interferometry, scanning capacitance microscopy and e-beam. This assessment should include each technique’s ultimate resolution, throughput and potential interactions with samples (contamination, or degree of mechanical damage) as key success criteria.

– In - line Defect Characterization and Analysis – Based on the need to work on smaller defect sizes and feature characterization, alternatives to optical systems and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy systems are required for high throughput in-line characterization and analysis for defects smaller than feature sizes. The data volume to be analyzed is drastically increasing, therefore demanding for new methods for data interpretation and to ensure quality.

– Next generation lithography - Manufacturing faces several choices of lithography technologies in the long term, which all pose different challenges with regard to yield enhancement, defect and contamination control.

Page 11: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

11

HsinChu December 5, 2012

Overall YE activities

• Activities performed since Summer Meeting:

– Review and update of tables

– Summary text for Executive Overview

2012 revision of the YE ITRS roadmap chapter completed

by September 2012

(Details concerning revisions are presented by the following slides)

– Future Fab International Article “Yield Enhancement”

– Update of membership list

Page 12: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

12

HsinChu December 5, 2012

WECC: Liquid Chemicals/ Ultra Pure Water/Gases/Precursors

• Recent activities:

– Review and update of Table YE 3 “Technology Requirements

for WECC”

– Review and update of Figure YE 3 “Potential Solutions for

WECC”

• Ongoing/ planned activities:

– Continue and expand FMEA for metals, anions, and organics

– Improve particle deposition models

– Update CVD/ALD precursor tables

Page 13: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

13

HsinChu December 5, 2012

WECC: AMC

• Recent activities:– Introduction of two new tables in the latest ITRS roadmap version:

• Table YE 4 “AMC monitoring methods”

• Table YE 4a “Supporting table for on-line methods”

– Review and text update of WECC and AMC chapter

– YE 3 clarification on refractory limits and footnote explanations introduced

• Ongoing/ planned activities:– Definition/standardization of „organics“

– Review for „AMC Definition“

– Introduction of EUV related contamination

– Discussion to add bare wafer suppliers requirements

– Review of „Potential solutions”

– Adjustments of the AMC limits

– Introduction of moisture as new chemical contamination for description of reticle environment

– Identification of critical steps for moisture control in FOUP environment

– Review requirements for 450 mm manufacturing

Page 14: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

14

HsinChu December 5, 2012

CIA – Activities and Messages

• Recent activities:– Revision of tables: No changes in

• YE4 (now YE5) “Defect Inspection on Pattern Wafer Technology Requirements”, • YE5 (now YE6) “Defect Inspection on Unpatterned Wafers: Macro and Bevel Inspection

Technology Requirements” • YE6 (now YE 7) “Defect Review and Automated Defects Classification Technology Requirements”.

• Ongoing/ planned activities:– Building upon the basis of the previous „Defect Detection and Characterization“ chapter,

the current scope of the chapter was defined in 2011 and confirmed during the meetings of 2010/2011/2012 as facing the characterization, inspection and analysis demands in broad applications (e.g. in the area of ‘More Moore’ and ‘More than Moore’ technologies, power electronics, mechatronics, MEMS applications, packaging and assembly):

– A further extension of the scope towards a better balance of defect/contamination detection and fault diagnostics/ control of electrical characteristics is under discussion. Respective ideas were first discussed during the summer meeting 2012. Proposal of Japan concerning extension of CIA focus

– Preparation of tables and potential solutions for the revision in 2013 needs further input of demands and intensified discussions w.r.t. their required contents.

– Include a new table on metal and organic contamination on wafer surfaces, bevel and edge, and backside.

– Include in potential solutions issues of small area detection of organics and metal contamination on wafer surfaces.

– Restructure of YE to be proposed by and discussed with the Japanese.

Page 15: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

15

HsinChu December 5, 2012

Proposal of Japanconcerning extension of CIA focus

• What to do?– Establish a better balance of defect/contamination detection and fault

diagnostics/ control of electrical characteristics in CIA focus– Include statistical/ systematic approach into YE activities– Include device/ chip/ system level tables and requirements into

ITRS2013 YE chapter

• Why?Extra/ Missing materials are root cause of yield excursion

Physical inspection often requires intensive efforts Such faults are more easily approached by detection of abnormal

device behaviour/ chip malfunction manifesting itself in out-of-spec electrical parameters

Page 16: 1 HsinChu December 5, 2012 ITRS - YE ITWG Conference in HsinChu December 5, 2012 Lothar Pfitzner lothar.pfitzner@iisb.fraunhofer.de.

20

HsinChu December 5, 2012

OutlookDevelopment/ Improvement of the Yield Enhancement chapter

– Discussion of the focus of YE chapter• What are the pros and cons of referring to not only physical/process defects but also to

device defects and abnormal electrical characteristics of a device?• Does a change of emphasis in YE (CIA) activities make sense (e.g. with respect to the

advent of MtM, inclusion of back end Yield, 450 mm technology)?• What about including an improved combination of yield of products/fault diagnosis/control

of electrical characteristics and defect/contamination detection of the wafer with the respective statistics in YE activities in order to achieve reasonable yield enhancement?

• Should we include tables for virtual metrology and for advanced control strategies?

– Reflection of current status and future requirements needs subsequent adjustment of outline and content of the chapter

• Keep tables for Front End Processing updated• Add Back End Yield Enhancement specifications• Look into Assembly and Packaging yield enhancement

– Determine the requirements w.r.t. yield enhancement for manufacturing of• More Moore• More than Moore• 3D• Larger diameter substrates• Masks