1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Promissory Estoppel F.H. Buckley [email protected].
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Foreseeability, Third Parties F.H. Buckley...
-
Upload
jocelyn-torres -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Foreseeability, Third Parties F.H. Buckley...
1
George Mason School of Law
Contracts II
Foreseeability, Third Parties
F.H. Buckley
Foreseeability
2
Hadley v. Baxendale 113
3
The Hadley Mill, Gloucester UK
Hadley v. BaxendaleGloucester to Greenwich
4
2.5 hrs, according to Mapquest
Hadley v. Baxendale
5
Tel: 011-44-203-188-2100
Hadley v. Baxendale
6
Just why do you think Pickfords is out of the business? Milgard Tempering at 117
Hadley v. Baxendale
7
Where the damages are astronomical, are you sure who the least cost risk avoider is?
Hadley v. Baxendale
8
Where the damages are astronomical , are you sure who the least cost risk avoider is?
Qu. Western Industries at 966
Hadley v. Baxendale
9
Just what was the Δs told?
Hadley v. Baxendale
10
Just what was the Δs told?
What if the headnote had been correct?
Hadley v. Baxendale
11
Just what was the Δs told?
What if the headnote had been correct?
Why might this be a rule of efficiency?
Just what is “on the cards”?Sprang Industries 957
12
BattenkillBrudge
Just what is “on the cards”?
Fort Pitt Bridge Why did the problem arise?
13
Just what is “on the cards”?
Fort Pitt Bridge Fort Pitt breached by delivering late, with
the result that Torrington incurred extra damages in pouring cement in cold weather
Could Torrington recover for these expenses?
14
Just what is “on the cards”?
Fort Pitt Bridge Could Torrington recover for these
expenses? Yes, since the alternative of waiting
another 8 months would have increased the damages even more A reasonable effort at mitigation
15
Increased labor costs in Cricket Alley 962
16
Increased labor costs in Cricket Alley
What was the promise?
17
Increased labor costs in Cricket Alley
What was the promise?
And what expenses did Cricket Alley incur as a consequence of the breach?
18
Increased labor costs in Cricket Alley
If increased labor costs are foreseeable, why not lost profits? Same diff… Recall Drews (new restaurant) Cook v. Woornick 965
19
Emotional Distress
Valentine at 967 Is it foreseeable that one might suffer
emotional distress on being fired?
20
Emotional Distress
Valentine at 967 Is it foreseeable that one might suffer
emotional distress on being fired? So why no recovery? Restatement § 353.
21
Emotional Distress
Is Allen v. Jones consistent with Valentine?
22 Jules et Jim
MitigationLuten Bridge: Building bridges to nowhere
23
Mebane Bridge Road, Eden NC
MitigationShirley MacLaine
24
Mitigation:Shirley MacLaine
Which film was the biggest turkey?
25
Mitigation:Shirley MacLaine
Which film was the biggest turkey?
Was she entitled to do nothing?
26
Mitigation:Shirley MacLaine
Which film was the biggest turkey?
Was she entitled to do nothing?
What if she had immediately walked in to a better contract?
27
Mitigation
What if the injured party is a business that gets new clients after the breach? Kersage Computer at 978
28
Liquidated damages
Restatement § 356
29
Lake River v. Carborundum
Restatement § 356
30
Lake River v. Carborundum
Lake River to bag and ship Carborundum’s Ferro Carbo
Why did LR insist on a liquidated damages clause?
31
Lake River v. Carborundum
Lake River to bag Carborundum’s Ferro Carbo
Why did LR insist on a liquidated damages clause?
And why was this a penalty?
32
Lake River v. Carborundum
And why was this a penalty? So what’s wrong with penalties?
33
Lake River v. Carborundum
And why was this a penalty? So what’s wrong with penalties?
Lemons and signalling A suitable case for paternalism? The efficient breach argument?
34
C and H Sugar
35
MV Moku Pahu
C and H Sugar
Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981
Sun completed the barge on March 16, 1982
Halter supplies the catamaran tug boat on July 15, 1982
Sun assembles tug to barge in July ‘82
36
C and H Sugar
Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981, or $4.4M
Was this in excess of the damages actually suffered?
37
C and H Sugar
Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981
Was this in excess of the damages actually suffered?
How does UCC § 2-718 assist? “anticipated or actual” A problem of concurrent causation
38
C and H Sugar
Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981
Was this in excess of the damages actually suffered?
Qu. Unit Vending v. Tobin at 990
39
Third Party Rights
A wants to enter into a contract with B in which B agrees to benefit C. How should this be drafted?
40
Third Party Rights
A wants to enter into a contract with B in which B agrees to benefit C. How should this be drafted? Are we sure that A wants C to have the
right to sue B for non-performance? And why might he not?
41
Third Party Rights
A wants to enter into a contract with B in which B agrees to benefit C. How should this be drafted? Suppose we are sure A wants C to have
the right to sue B for non-performance How to do it?
42
Third Party Rights
A wants to enter into a contract with B in which B agrees to benefit C. How should this be drafted? Suppose we are sure A wants C to have
the right to sue B for non-performance Join C as a party to the contract
43
Third Party Rights
A wants to enter into a contract with B in which B agrees to benefit C. How should this be drafted? Suppose we are sure A wants C to have
the right to sue B for non-performance Suppose C has just departed in a hot air
balloon and has left his BlackBerry behind?
44
Third Party Rights
A wants to enter into a contract with B in which B agrees to benefit C. How should this be drafted? Suppose we are sure A wants C to have
the right to sue B for non-performance Suppose C has just departed in a hot air
balloon and has left his BlackBerry behind? Did he leave an agent behind?
45
Third Party Rights
A wants to enter into a contract with B in which B agrees to benefit C. How should this be drafted? Suppose we are sure A wants C to have
the right to sue B for non-performance Suppose C is not yet born or identified
“the winner of the 2012 Booker Prize”
46
Third Party Rights
Trust relationships
A B
C
47
“settlor”
“trustee”
“beneficiary”“cestui que trust”
Third Party Rights
Trust relationships
A B
C
48
“settlor”
“trustee”
“beneficiary”“cestui que trust”
“trust res” Legal Interest
Beneficial Interest
Restatement 302
So when would you rely on it? “appropriate to effectuate the intention
of the parties” Either:
Satisfies an obligation of the promisee to pay money to the beneficiary; or
Circumstances indicate that the promisee intends to give the beneficiary the benefit of the promise
49
Restatement 302
So when would you rely on it? “appropriate to effectuate the intention
of the parties” Either:
Satisfies an obligation of the promisee to pay money to the beneficiary; or
Circumstances indicate that the promisee intends to give the beneficiary the benefit of the promise
50
Lawrence v. Fox
51
Lawrence v. Fox
Holly Fox Δ
Lawrence Π
52
$300
Lawrence v. Fox
Was the promise revocable?
Was Fox an agent of Lawrence?
53
Lawrence v. Fox
Was the promise revocable?
Was Fox an agent of Lawrence?
Why didn’t Lawrence sue Holly? Restatement 304
54
Lawrence v. Fox
Does every externality give rise to third party rights? Eisenberg’s hypothetical bargain
55
Donee Beneficiaries
Restatement 302(1)(b)
56
Donee Beneficiaries: Seaver 1009
Restatement 302(1)(b)
57
Donee Beneficiaries: Seaver 1009
Mrs Beman Judge
Seaver (niece)
58
Donee Beneficiaries: Seaver 1009
Why didn’t a trust relationship arise?
59
Donee Beneficiaries: Seaver 1009
Why didn’t a trust relationship arise?
Natural obligations to family members
60
Donee Beneficiaries: Drake 1012
Why shouldn’t the child be able to sue?
61
Donee Beneficiaries: Drake 1012
Why shouldn’t the child be able to sue? What’s the distinction between a
promise to pay college tuition and a promsie for periodic support?
62
Donee Beneficiaries: Drake 1012
Why shouldn’t the child be able to sue? What’s the distinction between a promise
to pay college tuition and a promise for periodic support?
“The duty ceases when the adult child refuses to heed to parent’s reasonable restrictions and leaves the custodial home”
63
Creditor Beneficiaries
Restatement 302(1)(a)
64
Creditor Beneficiaries: Hamill 1017
Hamill Gunnell
Maryland (performance bond)
65
Operating capital
Creditor Beneficiaries
In what sense was Maryland a third party beneficiary?
66
Creditor Beneficiaries
In what sense was Maryland a third party beneficiary? Hamill promised to finance Gunnell and
must have known about the need for a performance bond
Gunnell owed Maryland
67
Creditor Beneficiaries: Pierce 1020
Pierce Gilbanesubcontractor contractor
Nemours owner
68
HVAC
Summing up
69
An understanding of the common law…
Blackstone at the DC Circuit
70
Blackstone at the DC Circuit
71
Blackstone at the DC Circuit
72
Commentaries I.14 (1765)
The law of England abhors, and will not endure the existence of, slavery within this nation: so that when an attempt was made to introduce it, by statute … the spirit of the nation could not brook this condition, even in the most abandoned rogues; and therefore this statute was repealed in two years afterwards.
And now it is laid down, that a slave or negro, the instant he lands in England, becomes a freeman; that is, the law will protect him in the enjoyment of his person, his liberty, and his property.
R. v. Somerset (1772)
73
Granville Sharp
R. v. Somerset (1772)
74
Granville Sharp
R. v. Somerset (1772)
75
Wm Murray, Earl Of Mansfield
R. v. Somerset (1772)
76
The state of slavery is of such a nature, that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political, but only by positive law, which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasion, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory. It is so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law. Whatever inconveniences, therefore, may follow from the decision, I cannot say this case is allowed or approved by the law of England; and therefore the man, James Somerset, must be discharged.