1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Duress F.H. Buckley [email protected].
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley [email protected].
-
Upload
natalie-frost -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley [email protected].
![Page 2: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
When is performance due?
When can the seller sue for the price?
When can the buyer sue for the goods?
2
![Page 3: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Mutual Conditions
When can the seller sue for the price? UCC § 2-507: Tender of delivery is a
condition of the buyer’s duty to pay
When can the buyer sue for the goods? UCC § 2-511; Tender of payment is a
condition to the seller’s duty to tender
3
![Page 4: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Buyer’s Problem
Buyer agrees to pay seller $2M for custom-made machinery which can only be used by buyer
This will take a year to make and the cost of production is $100K per month.*
4
*There is no time-value of money here
![Page 5: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Buyer’s Problem
Buyer agrees to pay seller $2M for custom-made machinery which can only be used by buyer
This will take a year to make and the cost of production is $100K per month.
After a few days, buyer decides he can’t use the machine. Advise buyer.
5
![Page 6: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Buyer’s Problem
After two months, buyer decides he does not want the machine. Advise buyer.
If buyer sticks to the contract he’ll pay $2M for a worthless machine.
6
![Page 7: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Buyer’s Problem
After two months, buyer decides he does not want the machine. Advise buyer.
If buyer sticks to the contract he’ll pay $2M for a worthless machine.
If seller sticks to the contract he’ll spend $1.2M to make $2M, for a profit of 800K
7
![Page 8: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
A Coasian Solution
After two months, buyer decides he does not want the machine. Advise buyer.
If buyer sticks to the contract he’ll pay $2M for a worthless machine.
If seller sticks to the contract he’ll make 800K
So there’s a bargaining surplus if seller stops production
8
![Page 9: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
A Coasian Solution
After two months, buyer decides he does not want the machine. Advise buyer.
If buyer sticks to the contract he’ll pay $2M for a worthless machine.
If seller sticks to the contract he’ll make 800K
Seller will require at least $800K to terminate
9
![Page 10: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
A Coasian Solution
After two months, buyer decides he does not want the machine. Advise buyer.
If buyer sticks to the contract he’ll pay $2M for a worthless machine.
If seller sticks to the contract he’ll make 800K
Buyer will pay up to $2M to terminate
10
![Page 11: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
A Coasian Solution
After two months, buyer decides he does not want the machine. Advise buyer.
If buyer sticks to the contract he’ll pay $2M for a worthless machine.
If seller sticks to the contract he’ll make 800K
The parties will terminate for a price between $800K and $2M
11
![Page 12: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Unilateral Repudiation?
What if we gave the buyer the unilateral right to terminate the contract?
12
![Page 13: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Unilateral Repudiation?
What if we gave the buyer the unilateral right to terminate the contract? In that case, could the seller ever
begin performance without an assurance of payment?
13
![Page 14: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Mitigation?
Suppose that the buyer immediately tells the seller he can’t use the machine and will not take delivery, but will offer seller $800K in damages.
14
![Page 15: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Mitigation?
Suppose that the buyer immediately tells the seller he can’t use the machine and will not take delivery, but will offer seller $800K in damages.
What if seller nevertheless produces the machine and on tender demands payment of $2M?
15
![Page 16: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Mitigation?
Suppose that the buyer immediately tells the seller he can’t use the machine and will not take delivery, but will offer seller $800K in damages.
What if seller nevertheless produces the machine and on tender demands payment of $2M? The principle of mitigation:
Restatement § 350(1) See Illustration 1
16
![Page 17: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Summing up
Buyer should not be permitted to terminate unilaterally
However, a bilateral termination agreement may be efficient
If Buyer repudiates the agreement, the principle of mitigation will prevent the seller from inefficiently running up the tab
17
![Page 18: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
So why do we need Anticipatory Repudiation?
Suppose Buyer repudiates the agreement, and ten months later insists on full performance by the seller?
18
![Page 19: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
So why do we need Anticipatory Repudiation?
Suppose Buyer repudiates the agreement, and ten months later insists on full performance by the seller? Restatement § 251: seller may suspend
performance on repudiation
19
![Page 20: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Hochster v. De la Tour 799
Lord Campbell
![Page 21: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Hochster v. De la Tour
If a man promises to marry a woman in December and marries another woman in May, when is he liable for breach of promise?
21
![Page 22: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Hochster v. De la Tour
If a man promises to marry a woman in December and marries another woman in May, when is he liable for breach of promise? Short v. Stone, p. 800
22
![Page 23: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Hochster v. De la Tour
When were Πs duties to begin?
23
![Page 24: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Hochster v. De la Tour
When were Πs duties to begin? When did Δ send his letter of
repudiation?
24
![Page 25: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Hochster v. De la Tour
When were Πs duties to begin? When did Δ send his letter? When was the action brought?
25
![Page 26: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Hochster v. De la Tour
When were Πs duties to begin? When did Δ send his letter? When was action brought? When did Π enter into his contract
with Lord Ashburton?
26
![Page 27: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Hochster v. De la Tour
When were Πs duties to begin? When did Δ send his letter? When was action brought? When did Π enter into his contract
with Lord Ashburton? Could Π bring his action prior to the date
when his duties with Δ were to begin?
27
![Page 28: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Hochster v. De la TourThe “much more rational” standard
Suppose that Π had been required to wait to June 1 before terminating the contract What if Π had been offered alternative
employment on May 22 Could he accept this without breaching his
contract with Δ?
28
![Page 29: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Hochster v. De la TourThe “much more rational” standard
Suppose that Π had been required to wait to June 1 before terminating the contract What if Π had been offered alternative
employment on May 22 Suppose that he could take the position
with Lord Ashburton without breaching his contract with Δ? Does it follow that he can sue before June 1?
29
![Page 30: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Hochster v. De la TourThe “much more rational” standard
Suppose that Π had been required to wait to June 1 before terminating the contract What if Π had been offered alternative
employment on May 22 Suppose that he could take the position
with Lord Ashburton without breaching his contract with Δ? So why wait? De la Tour was about to travel.
30
![Page 31: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Hochster v. De la TourThe “much more rational” standard
Suppose that Π had been required to wait to June 1 before terminating the contract What if Π had been offered alternative
employment on May 22 Suppose that he could take the position
with Lord Ashburton without breaching his contract with Δ? Why permit him to sue before June 1? UCC § 2-610(b)
31
![Page 32: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Hochster v. De la TourThe “much more rational” standard
Suppose that Π had been required to wait to June 1 before terminating the contract What if Π had been offered alternative
employment on May 22 Could Hochester have turned down the
Ashburton offer and sued De la Tour for full damages? UCC § 2-610(a)
32
![Page 33: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Hochster v. De la TourThe “much more rational” standard
Must the innocent party communicate his acceptance of the repudiation?
33
![Page 34: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Hochster v. De la TourThe “much more rational” standard
Must the innocent party communicate his acceptance of the repudiation?Restatement 256
34
![Page 35: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
A bit of contract review
Is an offeror bound before his offer is accepted? Can the offeror revoke his offer at any
time prior to acceptance?
35
![Page 36: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
A bit of contract review
Is an offeror bound before his offer is accepted? Can the offeror revoke his offer at any
time prior to acceptance?
What is the logic behind the requirement of mutual assent?
36
![Page 37: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
A bit of contract review
What is the logic behind the requirement of mutual assent?
It’s not just that the parties mutually assent, but they must both know that the other has assented.
37
![Page 38: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
A bit of contract review
What is the logic behind the requirement of mutual assent?
Otherwise a possibility of a false start
38
![Page 39: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
A bit of contract review
It’s not just that the parties mutually assent, but they must both know that the other has assented. Need to communicate revocation of
acceptance Objective test of assent
39
![Page 40: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
A bit of contract review
The need for commercial certainty Full communication to the other party
tends to eliminate misunderstandings
40
![Page 41: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
A bit of contract review
The need for commercial certainty Full communication to the other party
tends to eliminate misunderstandings
Commercial certainty and anticipatory repudiation When is the seller to mitigate?
41
![Page 42: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
A bit of contract review
The need for commercial certainty Full communication to the other party
tends to eliminate misunderstandings
The presumption against options
42
![Page 43: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
A bit of contract review
The presumption against options You give me an option to buy 100 oz of
gold at $900/oz on August 1 next. If the price of gold is less than $900 at that
time the option is valueless. If the price of gold is above $900 at that
time, the option is “in the money” and is worth 100*(PriceAugust 1 - $900)
43
![Page 44: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
A bit of contract review
The presumption against options You give me an option to buy 100 oz of
gold at $900/oz on August 1 next The option is valuable and one should
not presume that it is given away for free
44
![Page 45: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
A bit of contract review
Options and anticipatory repudiation When the market is volatile, can an innocent
buyer get an option? Assume that:
Contract price is 100 Price on seller’s repudiation is 100 Price on date for delivery is 150 Buyer assets that he did not accept repudiation when
price was 100 and claims damages of 50
45
![Page 46: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
A bit of contract review
Options and anticipatory repudiation When the market is volatile, can an
innocent buyer get an option? Buyer assets that he did not accept repudiation
when price was 100 and claims damages of 50 UCC § 2-610(a): a commercially reasonable
time
46
![Page 47: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
UCC § 2-610
Is this in any way qualified by 2-609?
47
![Page 48: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt 802
Δ agrees to sell land to Π at $160K, closing June 30 Contingent on buyer obtaining zoning
for an asphalt plant
48
![Page 49: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
Letter of May 21: “we decided to withdraw the request for rezoning” In an effort to keep the thing moving, an
offer to purchase at $142.5K
49
![Page 50: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
Letter of May 21: “we decided to withdraw the request for rezoning” In an effort to keep the thing moving, an
offer to purchase at $142.5K
Δ rejects the offer of $142.5K on June 9
50
![Page 51: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
Letter of May 21: “we decided to withdraw the request for rezoning”
Δ rejects the offer of $142.5K on June 9
Π purports to proceed with the purchase at $160K on June 14
51
![Page 52: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
Letter of May 21: “we decided to withdraw the request for rezoning”
Qu. Did Πs repudiate the contract on May 21?
52
![Page 53: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
Letter of May 21: “we decided to withdraw the request for rezoning”
Qu. Did Πs repudiate the contract on May 21? Not “a clearly implied threat of
nonperformance”
53
![Page 54: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
Letter of May 21: “we decided to withdraw the request for rezoning”
Qu. Did Πs repudiate the contract on May 21? Aliter chill efficient renegotiations?
54
![Page 55: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
Letter of May 21: “we decided to withdraw the request for rezoning”
Qu. Did Πs repudiate the contract on May 21? Restatement §§ 250-51
Should the Δs have cured the problem?
55
![Page 56: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
If a fuzzy repudiation is permitted, the innocent party is given an opportunity to chisel the innocent party
56
![Page 57: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
If a fuzzy repudiation is permitted, the party in breach is also given an opportunity to chisel the innocent party
57
![Page 58: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
If there had been a repudiation, did the Πs retract it in time?
58
![Page 59: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Flatt v. Schupt
If there had been a repudiation, did the Πs retract it in time? Restatement § 256(1) Revocation of
repudiation is effective if communicated “before the injured party materially changes his position”
59
![Page 60: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
What about Lak? 812
60
![Page 61: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
What about Lak? 812
The seller offered to close “as is” The seller had acted reasonably and had
left open the possibility of further negotiations regarding the ambiguity
What’s the difference between a standard of reasonable behavior and a good faith standard? Cf. United Artists at 813
61
![Page 62: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Was there a clearly implied threat of nonperformance in Decker at 811?
62
![Page 63: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Was there a clearly implied threat of nonperformance in Decker at 811?
We’ll get right on it…
Could both parties have done something differently?
63
![Page 64: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
What about Bonebrake at 812?
Were the buyers acting reasonably?
Would a different result create a problem of opportunism?
64
![Page 65: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
What if you think your supplier is Insolvent?
65
![Page 66: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Insolvency
Presumptive grounds for repudiation under Restatement § 252
Right to assurance of performance. Restatement § 251.
Seller’s Remedy in UCC § 2-702
66
![Page 67: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Anticipatory Breach F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551408d9550346ec488b4cb9/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy
Presumptive grounds for repudiation under restatement § 252
Right to assurance of performance. UCC § 2-609
Seller’s Remedy in UCC § 2-702 Bankruptcy Code Sec. 365
(a) The trustee, subject to the court's approval, may assume or reject any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor.
67