1 Exploring the Strategies of a Successful Blood Donor Competition Presented by: Michele Lariviere...
-
Upload
kailyn-ordiway -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of 1 Exploring the Strategies of a Successful Blood Donor Competition Presented by: Michele Lariviere...
1
Exploring the Strategies of a Successful Blood Donor
Competition
Presented by:
Michele Lariviere
Assistant Director, Corporate & Community Relations
New York Blood Center
2
New York Blood Center
The regions of the New York Blood Center:
Brooklyn/Staten Island Blood Services Borough of Brooklyn,
Borough of Staten Island
Hudson Valley Blood Services Borough of The Bronx, Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Ulster, Westchester, Rockland, Sullivan
Long Island Blood Services Borough of Queens, Nassau, Suffolk
New Jersey Blood Services
New York Blood Services Borough of Manhattan
3
NYBC 2008-09 Volunteer Leadership Campaign
H O N O R A R Y C H A I RH o n . M ich ael R . B lo o m berg
M ay orC ity o f N ew Y o rk
B R O O K L Y N /ST A T E N I S L A N D B L O O D S E R V I C E S C H A IRT im o th y D . K ing
P r in cipalC P E X R eal E state
H U D SO N V A L L E Y B L O O D S E R V I C E S C H A I RB ern ee V . K ap i l i , M .D ., J .D .
F i r st V i ce P r esiden t , E m ployees' H eal th D epar tm en tN ew Y o rk L i fe I n su rance C o m p any
L O N G I S L A N D B L O O D S E R V I C E S C H A I RE d w ard T rav ag l ian ti
P r esiden tT D B an k , L o n g I sland
N E W J E R S E Y B L O O D SE R V I C E S C H A IRK ev in T . R igby
V ice P r esiden t , P u bl i c A ffai r s & C om m u n icat i on sN o v ar tis P h am aceu ticals
N E W Y O R K B L O O D S E R V I C E S C H A I RW il l iam J . M u l lan ey
P r esiden t , I n st i tu t i on al B u sin essM etL ife
C O M M U N I T Y C O -C H A I RH o n . N ich o las Sco p p etta
C om m ission erF ire D ep ar tm en t, C ity o f N ew Y o rk
C O M M U N I T Y C O -C H A I RH o n . R ay m on d W . K el ly
C om m ission erP o l ice D ep artm en t, C ity o f N ew Y o rk
E D U C A T I O N C H A I RD r . G ar r ie W . M o o re
V ice C han cel l or for S tu den t D ev elopm en tT h e C ity U n iv ersi ty o f N ew Y o rk
E N T E R T A I N M E N T C H A IRJ o sep h Ben in casa
E x ecu t i ve D i r ector an d G en er al M an agerT h e A cto rs' F u n d of A m er ica
H I G H S C H O O L C H A IRG eo rge M . Stein b ren n er , I I I
P r in cipal O w n erN ew Y o rk Y an k ees
H O S PI T A L C H A I RK en n eth R ask e
P r esiden tG reater N ew Y ork H o sp ital A sso ciation
N E W Y O R K C I T Y E M P L O Y E E C H A I RH o n . M ar th a K . H ir st
C om m ission erD ep ar tm ent o f C ity W id e A d m in istrativ e Serv ices, C ity o f N ew Y o rk
C H A I RW il l iam J . M u l lan ey
P r esiden t , I n st i tu t i on al B u sin essM etL ife
4
Objectives
• Review the inception and growth of The Commissioner’s Cup Program as a model of a successful Blood Donor Competition
• Review its use as a model for other NYBC Competitions and their results so far
• Determine what strategies and tactics are applicable to other programs
5
The NYPD’s Commissioner’s Cup Program
6
The Competition was created in 1996 when then NYPD Commissioner Howard Safir was challenged by the NYBC Volunteer Chairman, Donald Boudreau to stimulate donations within the NYPD.
At that time just over 1000 donations were made by the department which had over 30,000 employees.
NYPD Commissioner’s Cup - Inception
7
95/96 – 98/99
12501550
4100 4200
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99
Donations increased 164%
Donations increased 24%
Donations increased 164%
Donations increased 2%
8
NYPD StructureNYPD
PBBS DETECTIVES HOUSING BUILDING MAINTENANCE
FORENSICSSPECIAL
OPSNARCOTICS
FLEET SERVICES
60 PCT
61 PCT
62 PCT
63 PCT
67 PCT
68 PCT
69 PCT
70 PCT
71 PCT
72 PCT
76 PCT
78 PCT
PBBN PBSI PBQN PBQS PBMN PBMS PBBX TRANSIT ACADEMY
Manhattan
Brooklyn
Bronx
Queens
PSA 1
PSA 2
PSA 3
PSA 4
PSA 5
PSA 6
PSA 7
PSA 8
Brooklyn
Bronx
Staten Island
Manhattan
Queens
73 PCT
75 PCT
120 PCT
122 PCT
123 PCT
QNTF
104 PCT
108 PCT
100 PCT
101 PCT
102 PCT
CP PCT
19 PCT
20 PCT
1 PCT
5 PCT
40 PCT
52 PCT
BxTF
District 1
HQ
HQ
Applicant Processing
Medical
Explorer Program
Classes
Cadets
Staten Island
TRAFFIC
Parking
Traffic Control
AUX
BSTF
77 PCT
79 PCT
81 PCT
83 PCT
84 PCT
88 PCT
94 PCT
90 PCT
112 PCT
111 PCT
110 PCT
109 PCT
115 PCT
114 PCT
106 PCT
105 PCT
103 PCT
113 PCT
107 PCT
34 PCT
33 PCT
32 PCT
30 PCT
28 PCT
26 PCT
25 PCT
24 PCT
23 PCT
22 PCT
911
10 PCT
9 PCT
7 PCT
6 PCT
MTS PCT
MTN PCT
17 PCT
13 PCT
50 PCT
49 PCT
48 PCT
47 PCT
46 PCT
45 PCT
44 PCT
43 PCT
42 PCT
41 PCT
District 34District 33
District 32District 30
District 23District 20
District 12District 11
District 4District 3
District 2
POLICE MUSEUM
INTERNAL AFFAIRS
Queens HQ
SCHOOL SAFETY
Academy
Bronx
Queens Central HQ
Queens
StatenIsland
Brooklyn North
BrooklynSouth
PSA 9
Manhattan
9
Additional Awards Added
Commissioner’s Cup• Awarded to the patrol borough donating the most pints of blood during
the campaign year.
First Deputy Commissioner’s Award• Presented to a non-patrol borough unit donating the most pints of blood
during a campaign year.
Chief of Department’s Award• Presented to a patrol borough or non-patrol borough unit that is most
improved in donations from the previous campaign year.
Chief of Patrol’s Award• Presented to the patrol borough donating the most pints of blood
during the campaign year on a per capita ratio.
Chief of Personnel’s Award• Presented to a non-patrol unit donating the most pints of blood during
the campaign year on a per capita ration
10
98/99 – 99/00
4200
5795
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
98/99 99/00
Donations increased by 38%
11
1999 – 2002
* These donations were not counted in the competition or growth numbers
62185795 5935
372
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
99/00 00/01 2002
Calendar Year Campaign Year
*Donations increased by 5%
Donations increased by 2%
12
2002-2003
6218 6618
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
2002 2003
Donations increased by 6%
13
2003 - 2004
66188107
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
2003 2004
Donations increased by 22%
14
2004-2005
8107 7991
500
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
2004 2005
* In 2005 the NYPD had it’s only decline, they were set to hit a 5% growth, but a strike within the city caused a week of blood drive cancellations, including the NYPD academy which averages 500 units
15
2005 - 2006
79719109
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
2005 2006
Donations increased by 14% (1138 donations)
16
NYPD Growth from inception
6218 6618
8107 7971
91099855
11620
1250 1550
4100 4200
5795 5935
372
500
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
95/96
96/97
97/98
98/99
99/00
00/01
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Calendar Year Campaign Year (Nov 1 - Oct 31) Donations lost due to strike
17
Current Year Changes and Results
2736 2959
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2008 YTD 2009 YTD
NYPD is currently
18
On-going Program Components• Since the inception of the program the NYPD Commissioner has remained a
member of New York Blood Center’s Volunteer Leadership Team
• Congratulatory letters from our Chairman are sent out whenever there is a noteworthy achievement.
• NYPD receives yearly regional recognition, HVBS also recognizes an outstanding precinct.
• NYPD receives yearly recognition at the New York City Employee Blood Program Recognition event.
• NYPD is recognized as an outstanding donor group at NYBC’s Biennial Chairman’s Dinner
• Quarterly recognition in the NYBC “Working Together Newsletter,” numerous placements in the NYPD Magazine “Spring 3100”
• “BloodStat” - a quarterly newsletter about the NYPD’s blood program distributed to all commands is being piloted in 2009.
19
5 important steps
•Inception/Renewal
•Tracking results
•Reporting/Informing
•Recognition
•Change
20
Other Competitions at NYBC using Commissioner’s Cup Model
21
New York Yankees High School Blood Donor Championship Recognition Awards Criteria
• Each of the five New York Blood Center regions has a winner for each of the three categories of:
– Most Donations
– Most Donation vs. Senior Class Size
– Largest Increase in Donations over Prior Year.
• There is one winner in the category of “Rookie of the Year:” The winner is determined based on which new High School donor group has the Most Donations vs. Senior Class Size.
competition time frame - September 1 – May 31
22
Yankees High School Competition
0
15,000
30,000
45,000
60,000
75,000
1996-7 1997-8 1998-9 1999-0 2000-1 2001-2 2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9ytd
23
City of New York Employee Blood ProgramAwards Categories
Agencies are recognized for
• 100 or more Total Donations
• Increase of 25 or more Donations
• 15% or higher increase over previous year
• 20 or more donations per 100 employees
Overall Top Ten (Based on above criteria)
24
New York City Employee Blood Program
35,95033,09530,782
27,60025,120
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
25
2008 Financial Services Award Categories• Most Donations
– Bank– Brokerage– Insurance– Other
• Pints per 100 Employees– Bank– Brokerage– Insurance– Other
• Largest Increase – Bank– Brokerage– Insurance– Other
• Overall winners– Most donations – Pint/100 – MetLife– Largest Increase
26
Financial Services
• Top 10 donor groups (62% of total) are up 1% in 2008
• Largest increases: Morgan Stanley (+712 pints), PricewaterhouseCoopers (+253 pints), AIG (+248 pints)
• Principal decreases: JPMorgan Chase (-611 pints), Bear Stearns (-571 pints), Citigroup(-310 pints), Lehman Brothers (-138 pints) in 2008.
2007 2008 Change%
Change
Top Performer
Morgan Stanley 1770 2482 712 40%
Top Ten
Totals 20707 20959 251 1%
27
Skyscrapers for Life Awads Criteria
Property Management Group of the Year• The award for “Property Management Group of the Year” is the biggest prize of the competition, and is
physically the largest of all those given. The winner in this category will be determined by totaling the aggregate number of pints given in all participating buildings of a property management group.
Property of the Year• The award for “Property of the Year” goes to the property that produces the most pints of blood. The
award will be determined by total pints donated during the period of the competition. The physical award given for this category is larger than those given for the three categories below, but not as prominent as that of “Property Management Group of the Year.”
Best New Property• The award for “Best New Property” will go to a property that runs a drive for the first time in at least five
years, or for the first time after changing management companies/owners. The winner of this category will be determined based on total number of pints given during the period of the competition.
Greatest Increase• The award for “Greatest Increase” will go to the property that achieves the largest growth in pints when
compared to the same period in the prior year. This will be determined by growth in total pints during the period of the competition.
Highest Average Pints• The award for “Highest Average Pints” will go to the building which yields the highest average number
of pints for a single day drive. The winner will be determined by dividing the total number of pints during the period of the competition by the total number of days upon which blood drives were held. For example, if one building’s total for the competition year is 200 pints, and those drives were conducted over 5 days, the average at that property is 40 pints/drive.
28
29
Skyscrapers for Life
Goals (Apr. 08 – Mar. 09) Progress (Apr. 08 – Dec. 09)
4,000 Pints 3,741 pints (+52%)
Raise number of part. bldg’s from 56 to 75 81 Participating Buildings
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
2007 2008
30
Law firms Awards Criteria
• Total Donations, Top Ten
• All firms that host three or more campaigns
• All firms that hosted platelet drives
• Greatest increase in donations over previous year, must achieve at least 50 pint increase
31
Manhattan Law Firm Donations (2005-08)
0
1500
3000
4500
6000
2005 2006 2007 2008
•Manhattan Law Firm donations have increased 940 pints of blood since 2005 (25% increase).
•Donations have increased by 300 pints (7%) in 2008.
32
CUNY Awards CategoriesAcademic Year (September 1, 2008 – August 31, 2009)
•Most Donations
•Most Improved
•Percent Most Improved•Per Capita (based on full-time student population)
•The “Vice Chancellor’s Cup”(based on multi-criteria)
33
City University of New York
18 % Increase Over Previous Academic Year To Date
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
'06/07 '07/08 '08/09
Academic Year 9/1 – 8/31 results
34
Current Year ResultsSector Recognition Programs Competition Time
FrameResults
Financial Services*
(Calendar Year)
6/1/2008 – 12/31/2008
1/1/2009 – 4/30/2009
-9%
+1%
Skyscrapers for Life - Real Estate
(April 1 – March 31)
4/1/2008 – 3/31/2009 +31%
Manhattan Law Firms
(Calendar Year)
1/1/2008 – 12/31/2008
1/1/2009 – 4/30/2009
+7%
City University of New York
(Sept 1 – Aug 31)
9/1/2008 – 4/30/2009 +18%
NY Yankees High School Championship (Sept 1 – Aug 31)
9/1/2008 – 4/30/2009 +2%
NYC Employee Blood Program
(Calendar Year)
1/1/2008 – 12/31/2008
1/1/2009 – 4/30/2009
+10%
+4%
35
Strategies and Formulas in Common
To use in other “Competitions”
36
5 important steps
•Inception/Renewal
•Tracking
•Reporting/Informing
•Recognition
•Change
37
Final Thoughts
1. Involvement leads to commitment.
2. Communication is key!!
3. Deal with change as a way of doing business
4. Ignore naysayers
5. Give thanks!
38
Recognition is a product to deliver !
If you are going to do it – make sure you do it well!
39
Beyond Blood Donations
The best benefit of a good competition . . . is a great relationship!