1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric...
-
Upload
maximillian-long -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric...
![Page 1: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Energy Efficiency Program Status
Jay Zarnikau
Frontier Associates
On Behalf of the
Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization
July 2004
![Page 2: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Outline
2003 Program Activity Residential and Small Commercial Sector Activities
Measures Being Installed Demand Savings Incentive Costs per kW
Large Commercial and Industrial Sector Activities Measures Being Installed Demand Savings Incentive Costs per kW
Activities in Non-Attainment Areas Actions Taken to Enhance Program Effectiveness Outlook for 2005 and Beyond
![Page 3: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
2003 Achievements
Energy efficiency programs offered by the investor-owned electric utilities in Texas in 2003 resulted in about 150 MW of demand reduction and over 370 GWh of annual energy conservation.
This exceeds the demand reduction goal for energy efficiency programs established by the State Legislature by about 11%.
The Demand Goal was 135 MW, achievements were 150.7 MW.
Administrative costs were held to a comparatively low share of total program costs – in the 8% range.
![Page 4: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
2003 Program Activity
kW Achieved by Program
Hard To Reach SOP6%
Other Programs13%
Res/SC SOP17%
C&I SOP22%
Energy Star Homes MTP
32%
AC Distributor MTP10%
Energy Star Homes MTP
AC Distributor MTP
C&I SOP
Res/SC SOP
Hard To Reach SOP
Other Programs
![Page 5: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Residential Sector Achievements
Budgets are quickly committed. Small project set-asides are working well in stimulating
program participation by smaller local providers of energy efficiency services.
Hard-to-Reach goals are achieved (HTR savings exceed 5% of the total demand reduction).
A wide variety of measures are being completed, although a few (like duct efficiency and air infiltration improvements) dominate.
Programs are cost-effective. The Energy Star New Home program has been particularly
successful. CenterPoint and TXU Electric Delivery. continue to win EPA awards for their efforts in this area.
![Page 6: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Number of Installations: Res/Sm Comm and HTR SOPs
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000N
um
be
r o
f In
sta
llati
on
s
![Page 7: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Demand Savings: Res/Sm Comm and HTR SOPs
0
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
20,000kW
Sav
ings
![Page 8: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Incentives Paid per kW Savings: Res/Sm Comm and HTR SOPs
$0
$400
$800
$1,200
$1,600
$2,000$
pe
r kW
![Page 9: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Commercial Sector Achievements
Some programs were under-subscribed in 2003, so the utilities initiated a number of steps to increase program activity. These initiatives appear to be working.
A wide variety of measures are being completed. Programs are cost-effective. Demand reduction is being achieved at a
much lower cost than in the residential/small commercial sector.
![Page 10: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
C&I SOP: Numbers of Installations
0
100
200
300
400
500
![Page 11: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
C&I SOP: Demand Reduction
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
kW
![Page 12: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
C&I SOP: Incentives Paid per kW Savings
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Do
llar
s p
er k
W
![Page 13: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Activities in Non-Attainment Areas
Grand Totals by Non-Attainment,
Near-Non-Attainment, & Other 'Attainment' Counties
kW KWh % kW % KWh Total Non-Attainment 108,008 239,707,635 74% 68%
Total Near-Non-Attainment 17,134 34,947,559 12% 10%
Total Other 20,609 75,708,025 14% 22%
Totals 145,751 350,363,219
![Page 14: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Actions Taken to Enhance Program Effectiveness
Program activity in the C&I Sector was lower than anticipated in 2002, so a number of new program templates were undertaken in 2003 to increase C&I participation.
These new program efforts are paying off. Many of the utility C&I Standard Offer Programs are already fully subscribed this year. The new market transformation programs are off to a good start.
Small project set-asides are succeeding in promoting interest and participation in the programs among smaller local contractors.
![Page 15: 1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022080917/56649ee95503460f94bfab9a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Outlook for 2005 and Beyond
Update deemed savings values, as appliance and equipment standards change.
Continue outreach activities. We expect continued growth in program activity in the C&I sector. We are optimistic that, absent major changes in the program structure
or goal, that the programs will continue to promote sufficient energy efficiency activity to meet their peak demand goals.