1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Status Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director...

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

NSLS-II Project Status

Steve DierkerAssociate Laboratory Director for Light Sources

NSLS-II Project DirectorAccelerator Systems Advisory Committee

July 17, 2008


Key Project MilestonesAug 2005 CD-0, Approve Mission Need (Complete)Jul 2007 CD-1, Approve Alternative Selection and Cost Range (Complete)

Jan 2008 CD-2, Approve Performance Baseline (Complete)Dec 2008 CD-3, Approve Start of ConstructionFeb 2009 Contract Award for Ring BuildingAug 2009 Contract Award for Storage Ring MagnetsMar 2010 Contract Award for Booster SystemFeb 2011 1st Pentant Ring Building Beneficial Occupancy; Begin Accelerator InstallationFeb 2012 Beneficial Occupancy of Experimental FloorOct 2013 Start Accelerator Commissioning Jun 2014 Early Project Completion; Ring Available to BeamlinesJun 2015 CD-4, Approve Start of Operations


CD-2 IPR/EIR/ICR Findings and Resolutions• SC Independent Project Review – Nov 6-9, 2007

• 36 technical experts and scientists; technical, cost, schedule and management • Ready for CD-2 following evaluation of contingency allocation• Increased TPC from $896M to $912M; assigned contingency for OPC

• OECM External Independent Review/Indep. Cost Review – Nov 5-9, 2007• 10 project management experts; 18 lines of inquiry with expanded cost review• Deliverables and Key Performance Parameters (KPP’S) at CD-4• Modified KPPs and described baseline scope delivered at CD-4• Risk assessment, bases for cost contingency, documentation• Improved risk management; addressed documentation issues• Actions to address all major findings, findings, and observations either completed or

underway• ESAAB for CD-2 on Dec 11, 2007• CD-2 approved on Jan 18, 2008


Key Milestones Completed Since CD-2

• Initiate Conventional Facilities Final Design Dec 1, 2007• Beamline Develop. & Scien. Strategic Planning Workshops 1st Qtr 2008• SC Mini-Review Feb 26• Accelerator Systems Design 40% Complete Feb 28• GC and Subcontractor Information Meeting Mar 20• Letters of Interest for Beamline Advisory Teams Mar 30• Award Sextupole/Quadrupole Magnet Prototype May 15• CF 50% Final Design Complete May 21• SC Status Review June 17-18


Key Near-Term Milestones

• EVMS Certification Review July 30-31• 100% Title II Design Submission Aug 25• Construction Readiness Design Review Sep 3-5• Ring Building RFP Released to Industry Sep 26• Begin Site Preparation Oct 1• IPR for CD-3 Sep 30-Oct 3• EIR for CD-3 Oct 20-24• Ring Building Proposals Opened Nov 21• CD-3, Approve Start of Construction Dec• Contract Award for Ring Building Feb 20, 2009• GC Notice to Proceed Apr 15


Schedule Baseline


Current Level 2 Cost Baseline

NSLS-II Cost Baseline ($M) Project Management $ 51.7 Accelerator Systems 242.7 Conventional Facilities 247.5 Experimental Facilities 72.6 Total Construction Cost Baseline 614.5 Contingency 176.7 Total Estimated Costs (TEC) $ 791.2

R&D and Conceptual Design 60.6 Pre-Operations 50.2 Contingency 10.0 Other Project Costs (OPC) $ 120.8

Total Project Costs (TPC) $ 912.0


FY08 Funding Reduced from $65M to $49.7M

• FY08 Changes• Deferred $11M in contingency• Deferred $3M from Accelerator Systems – (Magnet Measurement Lab &

Linac Front End)• Deferred $0.4M from Conventional Facilities – (Site prep costs)• Reduced $0.4M from Project Management – Delayed hiring• Reduced $0.5M from Experimental Facilities – Delayed hiring

• FY09 Changes• Restored $11M to contingency• Restored $3M to Accelerator Systems• Restored $0.4M to Conventional Facilities• Added $0.9M to Management Reserve

• Will be able to achieve CD-3 on original schedule• No impact on TPC or CD-4 as long as funding is restored in FY09


Funding Profile with Operations & MIE

Note: Operations & MIE funding are not part of TPC

TEC = $791MTPC = $912M

Fiscal Year FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 TOTALR&D 3.0 20.0 10.0 2.0 0.8 35.8OPC 1.0 4.8 19.0 24.8PED 3.0 29.7 27.3 60.0Construction 66.0 162.5 252.9 166.1 57.4 26.3 731.2Pre-Ops 0.7 7.7 24.4 22.4 5.0 60.2Total NSLS-II Project 1.0 4.8 25.0 49.7 103.3 164.5 254.4 173.8 81.8 48.7 5.0 912.0Operations 5.0 30.0 65.0 120.0 150.0MIE 1.0 15.0 30.0 40.0 40.0 40.0

Funding Profile (M$)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

AY

M$

MIE

Operations

Pre-Ops

Construction

PED

OPC

R&D


Baseline Management Since CD-2

• Approved scope changes• Have only approved scope changes, and allocated contingency, for

programmatic needs that impact conventional facilities design and so must be done now:

Widen ring building by 3 m 6,429kIncrease storage ring height in tunnel from 1.0 m to 1.2 m 760kTotal contingency allocated $7,189k

• Modest cost growth due to design maturity and unit cost increases• Currently reviewing and updating Estimate At Completion (EAC) for CD-3


Performance BaselineNSLS-II Performance through April 2008

On Budget -- On Schedule

5.830.8

80.5

183.8

348.3

602.7

776.5

858.3

907.0 912.0

725.3

719.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15

Mill

ion

$

Total FundsCurrent BudgetOriginal BaselineEarned ValueActual Cost

Scheduled Work 7.3% Performed Work 7.1%Actual Cost 6.9%

M$ Cumulative Contingency 0 0 26 39 106 147 160 182 187


Contingency


Potential Scope Contingency

Bottom Line Estimate ($)Accelerator Systems $ 6 - 10 MConventional Facilities $ 29 MExperimental Facilities $ 5 M

Total $40 - 44 M


Cost & Schedule Performance

PV = Planned Value or Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS)EV = Earned Value or Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP)

AC = Actual Cost or Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP)

Plan Value, Earned Value, Actual Cost

0

10,000,000

20,000,00030,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,00070,000,000

80,000,000

90,000,000

Oct-07

Nov-07

Dec-07

Jan-08

Feb-08

Mar-08

Apr-08

May-08

Jun-08

Jul-08

Aug-08

Sep-08

FY 2008

$ D

olla

rs

BCWS (P V) BCWP (EV) ACWP (AC)


Overall Cost and Schedule Assessment

• Earned value tracking underway and becoming a meaningful tool for measuring progress and identifying issues

• Actual costs are in line with expectations• Planning to fully utilize available FY2008 funding

• Conventional facilities final design work, the dominant schedule driver, is on track• RFP for the ring building will be issued by the end of September• Accelerator design work is keeping pace with CF requirements• Excellent progress on beamline selection and team formation


Design Refinements Since CD-2• Design refinements have resulted from Value Engineering and additional

design detail• Beam height in tunnel increased from 1.0 m to 1.2 m and girders redesigned for new

height– More room for insertion devices; responds to CD-2 IPR recommendation

• Chilled and process water system revised– More centralized, fewer components, less space, more maintainable

• Experimental Floor radial width (from ratchet wall to aisle) increased from 11.6 m to 14.6 m– Increases maximum beamline length from 60 m to 66 m and provides increased transverse

experimental floor space• Bypass corridor for long beamlines redesigned

– Improved accessibility• LOB final design deferred to FY10

– Maximizes flexibility in design; doesn’t delay construction of LOBs, which was always scheduled for FY11


Site Plan


CD-3 Design Maturity

• Conventional Facilities - Completing Final Design prior to CD-3 reviews in Sept./Oct. (excluding LOBs for beamline support)

• Accelerator Systems Final Design Strategy• Complete final design for systems required to start civil construction

and to place final design/build contracts for a few accelerator systems• Final design for injector, booster, and storage ring RF transmitters and

cavities completed by fabrication vendors• Final design deferred for those systems only needed immediately

prior to project completion or benefiting from technology advances• Strategy makes optimum use of the long civil construction period and

enables resource leveling of staff

• Experimental Facilities• Beamline design work completed after beamline selection


Final Design Plans

• Projected Design % Complete Based on Value of NSLS-II Subsystems• 75% Complete Prior to CD-3 and Technical Risk Related to Key

Performance Parameters Retired

Level 2 System Value ($M)

Design or Spec. % Complete at CD-3

Total Level 2 Systems/Facilities 560.3 75%

Conventional Facilities 247.5 90%

Accelerator Systems 240.3 70%

Experimental Facilities 72.5 25%


Construction Readiness Design Review

• Review will be held on September 3 - 5, Chaired by Greg Bock, FNAL

• Requirements for CD-3 approval• Conventional Facilities:

– Is the final design complete and ready to proceed with construction? – Are the bid packages sufficiently clear, well defined , and ready for bidding?

• Accelerator Systems and Experimental Facilities: – Are the designs or specifications well enough advanced to proceed with conventional construction?

• Construction Readiness Design Review will assess if we are ready for CD-3• Review general progress since CD-2• Assess readiness for construction start of conventional facilities• Assess design status and identify any remaining major design issues that must be mitigated

prior to CD-3 approval


NSLS-II Project Organization


Recent Project Management Hires

Deputy Project DirectorAesook Byon

(Effective Sep 1)

ES&H ManagerSteve Hoey

(Effective May 12)

Experimental Facilities Division Director

Qun Shen(Effective July 14)

Jim Yeck will become Assistant Project Director for Conventional Construction effective September 1


NSLS-II Staff

Cumulative New Hires by Month

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Jan-

06

Feb-

06

Mar

-06

Apr

-06

May

-06

Jun-

06

Jul-0

6

Aug

-06

Sep

-06

Oct

-06

Nov

-06

Dec

-06

Jan-

07

Feb-

07

Mar

-07

Apr

-07

May

-07

Jun-

07

Jul-0

7

Aug

-07

Sep

-07

Oct

-07

Nov

-07

Dec

-07

Jan-

08

Feb-

08

Mar

-08

Apr

-08

May

-08

Jun-

08

Month

Hea

ds

.

Project Management & Support Accelerator DivisionExperimental Facilities Division Conventional Facilities Division


Summary

• Conventional facilities final design is the most critical activity for this year and is a prerequisite for the CD-3 review process

• RFP w/ drawings and specifications will be released by September 26• Bid pricing known by the end of November

• The design of NSLS-II accelerator systems is progressing on schedule relative to the performance baseline

• Beamline selection on schedule• Project organization well established and staff buildup on track• Project management systems are in place and working• NSLS-II will be ready for the CD-3 reviews starting in early

September


Charge to the Committee• Is the NSLS-II Accelerator Systems R&D program sufficiently advanced to support the

remaining design work?• Is the maturity of the design and development of the accelerator system consistent with the

Final Design Plan and are the interfaces with the NSLS-II building and other conventional facilities sufficiently well defined for start of construction of the ring building?

• Is the storage ring magnet system, including the planned linear and non-linear correction systems, adequate to achieve the required accelerator performance?

• Do the design choices of the injector system support the anticipated storage ring performance parameters and is the preliminary layout sufficiently well defined to start the turn-key procurement process in 2009?

• Alignment and stability R&D will be completed soon. Are the proposed procedures sufficient to guarantee that the tight alignment tolerances will be routinely achieved during the installation process?

• Are the planned diagnostic systems sufficient and adequate to allow for efficient commissioning and accelerator tune-up?

• Comment on the status of cryogenics system, electrical and mechanical utilities.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Status Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director...

Documents

Transcript of 1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Status Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director...