#00':74'environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/EIA/06112019X6... · 2019. 11. 6. · mm MCft 12...
Transcript of #00':74'environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/EIA/06112019X6... · 2019. 11. 6. · mm MCft 12...
mm MCft
1 2 3
y = 0.2292x -
31.047 from
Table 7.1 of
earlier study
5
y = 0.4571x -
67.008 from
Table 7.2 of
earlier study
7
y = 0.939x -
163.65 from
Table 7.3 of
earlier study
9
y = 0.755x -
43.547 from
Table 7.4 of
earlier study
11
y =.0733x1+ 0.4242x2 -
12.2289 from Table 7.5
of earlier study 13 14
1 1941 179.13 10.01 165.22 8.51 270.61 90.45 189.42 99.47 61.67 27.82 236.26 1617.78
2 1942 217.41 18.78 632.29 222.01 584.08 384.80 193.04 102.20 47.65 22.14 749.94 5135.25
3 1943 343.17 47.61 444.92 136.36 247.56 68.81 324.95 201.79 76.70 44.12 498.70 3414.88
4 1944 158.17 5.21 635.89 223.66 331.77 147.88 262.34 154.52 58.28 31.72 562.99 3855.12
5 1945 155.16 4.52 602.54 208.41 383.19 196.17 288.43 174.22 88.76 46.56 629.88 4313.13
6 1946 322.86 42.95 672.82 240.54 504.09 309.69 165.47 81.38 57.47 24.28 698.84 4785.38
7 1947 59.95 0.00 605.58 209.80 374.15 187.68 249.15 144.56 77.04 38.71 580.75 3976.76
8 1948 104.10 0.00 543.06 181.23 279.60 98.90 264.90 156.45 26.52 18.44 455.01 3115.74
9 1949 106.08 0.00 614.10 213.70 295.59 113.90 363.96 231.24 159.01 81.90 640.74 4387.55
10 1950 82.60 0.00 578.91 197.61 141.88 0.00 235.51 134.27 6.01 7.58 339.46 2324.47
11 1951 193.61 13.33 413.78 122.13 385.17 198.03 173.64 87.55 58.99 25.52 446.56 3057.86
12 1952 79.22 0.00 488.02 156.07 303.38 121.23 170.92 85.49 66.89 28.67 391.46 2680.55
13 1953 288.08 34.98 362.96 98.90 824.91 610.94 167.01 82.55 114.31 48.50 875.87 5997.60
14 1954 82.58 0.00 576.06 196.31 514.85 319.79 465.24 307.71 47.63 42.08 865.89 5929.22
15 1955 316.08 41.40 257.55 50.72 444.34 253.59 318.92 197.23 202.43 97.02 639.96 4382.17
16 1956 259.07 28.33 634.47 223.01 300.35 118.38 226.77 127.66 85.26 40.56 537.94 3683.59
17 1957 133.27 0.00 435.70 132.15 776.68 565.65 112.44 41.34 57.91 20.58 759.72 5202.26
18 1958 81.15 0.00 598.92 206.76 477.19 284.43 260.36 153.03 133.00 63.27 707.49 4844.60
19 1959 247.21 25.61 759.34 280.09 749.52 540.15 509.33 341.00 99.14 67.16 1254.00 8586.88
20 1960 216.57 18.59 584.99 200.39 447.37 256.43 291.14 176.26 240.67 111.20 762.88 5223.86
21 1961 228.70 21.37 624.42 218.41 403.43 215.17 339.19 212.54 39.43 29.36 696.85 4771.76
22 1962 197.86 14.30 620.17 216.47 387.62 200.33 364.74 231.83 39.33 31.19 694.12 4753.06
23 1963 163.59 6.45 382.13 107.66 675.05 470.22 172.33 86.56 187.64 80.00 750.90 5141.82
24 1964 263.64 29.38 270.80 56.77 535.43 339.12 409.68 265.76 126.00 71.25 762.28 5219.79
25 1965 190.44 12.60 513.59 167.75 212.11 35.52 188.52 98.78 1.24 2.12 316.77 2169.12
26 1966 167.36 7.31 637.94 224.59 348.71 163.79 381.08 244.17 63.14 42.49 682.35 4672.43
27 1967 280.51 33.25 516.52 169.09 389.25 201.85 100.47 32.31 27.35 6.74 443.24 3035.12
28 1968 82.89 0.00 336.92 87.00 148.19 0.00 258.50 151.62 202.85 92.77 331.38 2269.18
29 1969 134.94 0.00 557.51 187.83 308.99 126.50 335.00 209.38 83.72 47.84 571.54 3913.69
30 1970 141.34 1.35 232.99 39.49 335.00 150.91 120.93 47.75 79.43 30.33 269.84 1847.72
31 1971 257.65 28.01 385.10 109.02 265.77 85.91 114.12 42.61 157.73 63.05 328.59 2250.06
32 1972 181.23 10.49 477.46 151.24 256.55 77.25 184.85 96.01 96.77 42.37 377.36 2584.02
33 1973 115.00 0.00 433.52 131.15 389.78 202.36 69.50 8.93 283.96 113.32 455.76 3120.85
34 1974 226.61 20.89 166.37 9.04 368.37 182.25 194.53 103.32 195.37 84.91 400.41 2741.81
35 1975 284.26 34.10 220.67 33.86 340.86 156.42 376.79 240.93 164.66 85.24 550.55 3769.95
36 1976 96.45 0.00 752.33 276.88 361.00 175.33 209.77 114.83 0.78 3.48 570.52 3906.67
37 1977 188.23 12.10 482.72 153.64 325.63 142.12 124.49 50.45 26.16 7.99 366.30 2508.25
38 1978 338.56 46.55 568.81 192.99 654.01 450.46 89.07 23.70 17.42 1.69 715.40 4898.74
39 1979 231.92 22.11 124.78 0.00 222.26 45.05 219.16 121.92 48.05 24.22 213.30 1460.56
40 1980 279.33 32.97 434.15 131.44 390.25 202.80 174.62 88.29 10.73 5.12 460.63 3154.19
41 1981 187.48 11.92 448.83 138.15 478.47 285.63 285.05 171.67 33.82 23.01 630.39 4316.63
42 1982 192.72 13.12 299.50 69.89 601.30 400.97 139.05 61.43 109.68 44.49 589.91 4039.46
43 1983 250.09 26.27 445.43 136.60 553.29 355.88 430.81 281.71 166.17 89.84 890.31 6096.44
44 1984 181.90 10.64 372.83 103.41 241.30 62.93 182.06 93.91 35.69 16.26 287.16 1966.32
45 1985 135.98 0.12 273.10 57.83 517.28 322.08 112.28 41.22 174.85 70.17 491.42 3365.04
46 1986 134.63 0.00 346.23 91.25 456.33 264.84 118.50 45.92 39.65 13.28 415.29 2843.76
47 1987 217.68 18.85 401.06 116.32 308.90 126.41 156.25 74.42 77.77 32.21 368.21 2521.32
48 1988 174.58 8.97 1265.69 511.54 149.19 0.00 274.78 163.91 83.98 43.54 727.95 4984.70
49 1989 287.55 34.86 528.18 174.42 397.76 209.85 217.13 120.38 2.28 4.66 544.17 3726.26
50 1990 184.08 11.14 369.12 101.72 826.87 612.78 196.52 104.83 165.77 72.49 902.97 6183.12
51 1991 213.38 17.86 549.05 183.96 317.48 134.46 184.11 95.46 69.72 30.84 462.58 3167.58
52 1992 276.85 32.41 457.40 142.07 541.05 344.40 225.74 126.89 18.47 12.15 657.92 4505.15
53 1993 108.50 0.00 474.16 149.73 268.51 88.48 434.37 284.41 137.00 77.73 600.34 4110.90
54 1994 176.36 9.37 571.84 194.38 470.09 277.76 158.62 76.21 81.95 34.16 591.89 4053.00
55 1995 179.60 10.12 501.94 162.43 410.24 221.57 151.27 70.67 272.85 114.60 579.38 3967.34
56 1996 327.95 44.12 390.97 111.70 465.55 273.50 169.79 84.64 39.62 17.02 530.99 3636.02
57 1997 96.60 0.00 310.69 75.01 373.68 187.24 237.20 135.54 43.82 23.75 421.54 2886.50
58 1998 166.21 7.05 473.01 149.20 310.60 128.01 299.21 182.36 120.29 60.73 527.35 3611.05
59 1999 355.61 50.46 396.43 114.20 552.86 355.49 88.43 23.22 112.89 42.14 585.51 4009.30
60 2000 126.82 0.00 213.37 30.52 204.15 28.05 33.59 0.00 5.35 0.00 58.57 401.07
61 2001 114.71 0.00 133.51 0.00 151.76 0.00 32.15 0.00 25.60 0.99 0.99 6.75
62 2002 67.78 0.00 47.12 0.00 257.74 78.37 42.44 0.00 13.01 0.00 78.37 536.63
63 2003 50.36 0.00 271.36 57.03 168.26 0.00 48.52 0.00 77.17 24.06 81.10 555.32
64 2004 82.36 0.00 125.26 0.00 138.12 0.00 36.54 0.00 35.05 5.32 5.32 36.41
65 2005 67.87 0.00 157.76 5.11 143.35 0.00 133.92 57.56 49.88 18.75 81.42 557.50
66 2006 95.00 0.00 229.07 37.70 375.99 189.40 311.13 191.36 72.75 41.44 459.90 3149.20
67 2007 224.52 20.41 207.77 27.97 270.85 90.67 277.92 166.28 130.01 63.29 368.62 2524.19
68 2008 157.23 4.99 360.87 97.95 477.47 284.70 192.09 101.48 41.79 19.58 508.69 3483.32
69 2009 25.45 0.00 269.56 56.21 167.67 0.00 166.51 82.16 83.65 35.46 173.84 1190.35
70 2010 164.96 6.76 540.79 180.19 389.45 202.04 203.71 110.26 74.85 34.45 533.70 3654.56
71 2011 385.77 57.37 183.30 16.78 244.13 65.59 145.87 66.59 8.51 2.07 208.40 1427.04
72 2012 109.12 0.00 309.20 74.33 398.72 210.74 296.43 180.26 168.10 80.81 546.14 3739.73
73 2013 268.65 30.53 518.94 170.20 340.60 156.17 146.76 67.25 282.98 118.57 542.72 3716.31
74 2014 43.16 0.00 376.38 105.04 329.91 146.14 458.66 302.75 72.08 51.97 605.89 4148.85
75 2015 571.69 99.98 221.64 34.30 150.15 0.00 215.94 119.49 9.42 7.60 261.37 1789.76
* Note
*SEP
Weighted
Average
Rainfall in
mm from
Table 4(a)
Corresponding
Runoff (mm)
Y =aX + b
*OCT
Weighted
Average
Rainfall in mm
from Table
4(a)
Corresponding Runoff
(mm)
Y =aX + b
Monsoon Yield as a summation of
Monthly Yields
Monthly Weighted Average Rainfalls have been taken from Table 4(a)
STATEMENT SHOWING MONTHLY YIELD OF MODIKUNTAVAGU PROJECT
Sl.
NoYear
*JUN
Weighted
Average
Rainfall in mm
from Table
4(a)
Corresponding
Runoff (mm)
Y =aX + b
*JUL
Weighted
Average
Rainfall in
mm from
Table 4(a)
Corresponding
Runoff (mm)
Y =aX + b
*AUG
Weighted
Average
Rainfall in mm
from Table 4(a)
Corresponding
Runoff (mm)
Y =aX + b
Tim
e(hr
)U
Hor
dina
tes(
cum
ecs)
1.71
41.
714
2.35
22.
352
2.35
24.
266
4.90
46.
854
11.2
484.
904
3.62
81.
714
0.43
60.
436
0.43
61.
702
1.70
21.
702
1.70
21.
702
1.70
81.
702
1.70
20.
436
DSR
OBA
SEFL
OW
TOTA
LFLO
W(C
UM
ECS)
00.
000.
000.
0011
.64
11.6
41
6.30
10.8
00.
0010
.80
11.6
422
.44
233
.30
57.0
810
.80
0.00
67.8
711
.64
79.5
13
84.9
014
5.52
57.0
814
.82
0.00
217.
4111
.64
229.
054
130.
4522
3.59
145.
5278
.32
14.8
20.
0046
2.25
11.6
447
3.89
510
3.10
176.
7122
3.59
199.
6878
.32
14.8
20.
0069
3.13
11.6
470
4.77
666
.10
113.
3017
6.71
306.
8219
9.68
78.3
226
.88
0.00
901.
7111
.64
913.
357
45.5
077
.99
113.
3024
2.49
306.
8219
9.68
142.
0630
.90
0.00
1113
.23
11.6
411
24.8
78
30.6
052
.45
77.9
915
5.47
242.
4930
6.82
362.
1816
3.30
43.1
80.
0014
03.8
811
.64
1415
.52
919
.80
33.9
452
.45
107.
0215
5.47
242.
4955
6.50
416.
3522
8.24
70.8
60.
0018
63.3
111
.64
1874
.95
1011
.30
19.3
733
.94
71.9
710
7.02
155.
4743
9.82
639.
7358
1.90
374.
5630
.90
0.00
2454
.67
11.6
424
66.3
111
6.10
10.4
619
.37
46.5
771
.97
107.
0228
1.98
505.
6089
4.10
954.
9616
3.30
22.8
60.
0030
78.1
811
.64
3089
.82
122.
804.
8010
.46
26.5
846
.57
71.9
719
4.10
324.
1570
6.65
1467
.30
416.
3512
0.81
10.8
00.
0034
00.5
411
.64
3412
.18
131.
402.
404.
8014
.35
26.5
846
.57
130.
5422
3.13
453.
0511
59.6
763
9.73
308.
0257
.08
2.75
0.00
3068
.65
11.6
430
80.2
914
0.00
0.00
2.40
6.59
14.3
526
.58
84.4
715
0.06
311.
8674
3.49
505.
6047
3.27
145.
5214
.52
2.75
0.00
2481
.45
11.6
424
93.0
915
0.00
3.29
6.59
14.3
548
.21
97.1
020
9.73
511.
7832
4.15
374.
0522
3.59
37.0
214
.52
2.75
0.00
1867
.12
11.6
418
78.7
616
0.00
3.29
6.59
26.0
255
.42
135.
7134
4.19
223.
1323
9.81
176.
7156
.88
37.0
214
.52
10.7
20.
0013
30.0
011
.64
1341
.64
170.
003.
2911
.94
29.9
177
.45
222.
7115
0.06
165.
0711
3.30
44.9
556
.88
37.0
256
.68
10.7
20.
0097
9.99
11.6
499
1.63
180.
005.
9713
.73
41.8
112
7.10
97.1
011
1.02
77.9
928
.82
44.9
556
.88
144.
5056
.68
10.7
20.
0081
7.26
11.6
482
8.90
190.
006.
8719
.19
68.6
155
.42
71.8
352
.45
19.8
428
.82
44.9
522
2.03
144.
5056
.68
10.7
20.
0080
1.90
11.6
481
3.54
200.
009.
6031
.49
29.9
141
.00
33.9
413
.34
19.8
428
.82
175.
4822
2.03
144.
5056
.68
10.7
20.
0081
7.34
11.6
482
8.98
210.
0015
.75
13.7
322
.13
19.3
78.
6313
.34
19.8
411
2.50
175.
4822
2.03
144.
5056
.68
10.7
60.
0083
4.73
11.6
484
6.37
220.
006.
8710
.16
10.4
64.
938.
6313
.34
77.4
411
2.50
175.
4822
2.03
144.
5056
.88
10.7
20.
0085
3.92
11.6
486
5.56
230.
005.
084.
802.
664.
938.
6352
.08
77.4
411
2.50
175.
4822
2.03
145.
0156
.68
10.7
20.
0087
8.03
11.6
488
9.67
240.
002.
401.
222.
664.
9333
.70
52.0
877
.44
112.
5017
5.48
222.
8114
4.50
56.6
82.
7588
9.14
11.6
490
0.78
250.
000.
611.
222.
6619
.23
33.7
052
.08
77.4
411
2.50
176.
0922
2.03
144.
5014
.52
856.
5911
.64
868.
2326
0.00
0.61
1.22
10.3
819
.23
33.7
052
.08
77.4
411
2.90
175.
4822
2.03
37.0
274
2.09
11.6
475
3.73
270.
000.
614.
7710
.38
19.2
333
.70
52.0
877
.71
112.
5017
5.48
56.8
854
3.34
11.6
455
4.98
280.
002.
384.
7710
.38
19.2
333
.70
52.2
677
.44
112.
5044
.95
357.
6211
.64
369.
2629
0.00
2.38
4.77
10.3
819
.23
33.8
252
.08
77.4
428
.82
228.
9211
.64
240.
5630
0.00
2.38
4.77
10.3
819
.30
33.7
052
.08
19.8
414
2.45
11.6
415
4.09
310.
002.
384.
7710
.42
19.2
333
.70
13.3
483
.84
11.6
495
.48
320.
002.
384.
7810
.38
19.2
38.
6345
.41
11.6
457
.05
330.
002.
394.
7710
.38
4.93
22.4
711
.64
34.1
134
0.00
2.38
4.77
2.66
9.81
11.6
421
.45
350.
002.
381.
223.
6011
.64
15.2
436
00.
610.
6111
.64
12.2
537
00.
0011
.64
11.6
4
DES
IGN
FLO
OD
CA
LCU
LATI
ON
S
FIELD PHOTOGRAPHS
MODIKUNTA VAGU PROJECT SITE
PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE RIVER SECTION WITH ALLUVIUM
PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE FOLDING IN SANDSTONE ALONG THE ROAD CUTTING IN BUFFER ZONE
DOLOMITE EXPOSED ON GODAVARI RIVER BED UPSTREAM OF PROJECT SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE WELLS INVENTORIED
Not
e: D
L –
Desir
able
Lim
it, P
L –
Perm
issib
le L
imit,
BDL
– B
elow
Det
ecta
ble
Lim
it
Note:�Species�identified�by�ESHCPL�team;�D=�Density,�Frq=�frequency,�Do=Dominance,�BA=�Basal�area,�RD=�Relative�density,�RFr=�Relative�frequency,�RDo=�Relative�Dominance,�IVI=�Important�Value�Index.�
�����N
ote:
�Spe
cies
�reco
rded
�by�
EHSC
PL�te
am,�N
A��N
ot�A
sses
sed.
�
ZOOPLANKTON
ZOOPLANKTON
Modiguntavagu (LIS) Socio-Economics, Telangana State
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Personal details of respondentName of the respondent
Name of the Village
Name of the Taluk
Name of the District
Occupation
Sl. No.
Name of the person Age M/F Education Occupation Annual Income
1234567
2. Whether any of the family members is physically handicapped?
Yes No No
3. Caste :
4. Are you aware of Modiguntavagu Lift Irrigation Scheme?
Yes No
5. Whether is there any need of irrigation facilities to this region?
Yes No
If Yes, Why?
If No, Why?
MDGVLIS/SE/01 Page 1
Modiguntavagu (LIS) Socio-Economics, Telangana State
6. Land detailsTotal Land owned 1. Dry land
2. Irrigated landMode of irrigation
7. Are you willing to give your land for construction of canals?
Yes No
If Yes, What is the type of compensation expected?
If No, why?
8. Whether any of your land has been acquired earlier for any of the government projects?
Yes No
If yes, which project?
9. Whether the project will bring Socio-Economic improvement in the region?
10. Remarks (Any other information)
Name and signature of surveyor Date of survey
MDGVLIS/SE/01 Page 2
DAM BREAK ANALYSIS USING RIVER MODELING SOFTWARES
Hydrologic Engineering Centre - River Analysis System (HEC-RAS)
It's a water powered model created by the hydrologic building focus armed force corps of
architects USA. It was discharged to help water powered designers in stream channel
examination and floodplain distinguishing proof. Before long, it got to be standard stream
pressure driven investigation program, later its capacities were extended for extension, weir,
duct examination. Initially it was developed for main frame computer use, currently it can work
on PC & work stations.
The capabilities of HEC-RAS are,
� Modeling of one-dimensional steady flow.
� Modeling of unsteady flow simulation.
� Movable boundary sediment transport calculations.
� Modeling subcritical, supercritical, & mixed flow regimes
1. HEC-RAS parameters.
For stream channel geometry & water flow, its hydraulic analysis HEC-RAS uses a number of
input parameters. The locations of stream banks are identified & used to divide them as main
channel, left flood way, & right floodway for each cross section, it does so because of
difference in hydraulic parameters.
2. Data Storage & Management
Data storage is accomplished through the use of “flat” files, user input data are stored in flat
files under separate categories of projects, (plan, geometry, unsteady flow etc). Output data is
predominantly stored in separate binary files. Data can be transferred between HEC-RAS &
other programs by using the HEC-DSS. Data management is accomplished through the user
interface.
ANNEXURE-14
Steps in developing hydraulic model using HEC-RAS,
� Starting a new project.
� Entering geometric data.
� Entering flow data & boundary conditions.
� Performing the hydraulic calculations.
� Viewing & printing results.
3. Theoretical basis for one dimensional flow calculations.
3.1. Steady flow water surface profiles
“Equations for basic profile calculations,
Z1z2=elevation of main channel inverts
Y1y2=depth of water at cross sections
V1v2=average velocity (total discharge/total flow area)
G=gravity
He=head loss
3.2. Cross section subdivision for conveyance calculations
K = …………………………………………….(2)
K=conveyance for subdivision
A=flow area for subdivision
R= hydraulic radius for subdivision
3.3. Evaluation of mean kinetic energy head
“The velocity coefficient ‘a’ is computed based on the conveyance in the three flow elements
left overbank, right overbank & channels. It can also be written in terms of conveyance & area
as in the following eqn.
At= Total flow area of cross section.
Alob,Arob,Ach= flow areas of lob,rob,ch
Kt= total conveyance of cross section.
Krob,klob,kch= conveyance of lob, rob, ch.” Lob=Left of bank, Rob=Right of bank,
ch=channel.
3.4. Friction loss evaluation
Avg conveyance eqn = 2……………………..(4)
Avg friction slope eqn= )………………………….(5)
Geometric mean friction slope eqn =sf’= √sf1xsf2………………………(6)
Harmonic mean friction slope eqn
………………………………………………..(7)
3.5. Contraction & expansion loss evaluation
………………………………(8)
C = contraction or expansion coefficient
3.6. Critical depth determination
Critical depth for a cross section will be determined if any of the following conditions are
satisfied.
1) The supercritical flow regime has been specified
2) The calculation of critical depth has been requested by user.
The total energy head for a cross section is defined by,
……………………………(9)
H=total energy head
Ws= water surface elevation
= velocity head.
4. Preparation of Data for use in HEC-RAS
The HEC-RAS requires the cross sections, Manning’s roughness coefficient, channel length
and other geomorphological data. These data for the selected site are not available. However,
some of these data can be derived using Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of higher resolution
with the use of HEC-GeoRAS. In this software we can derive most of the information required
for the HEC-RAS program. The step-by-step procedure is given below,
4.1 HEC-GeoRAS Development
HEC-GeoRAS is an arrangement of instruments particularly intended to handle geospatial
information to bolster pressure driven model improvement and investigation of water surface
profile results(HEC,2005). GeoRAS helps engineers in making datasets (alluded to all in all as
RAS Layers) in ArcGIS to concentrate data vital for pressure driven displaying. The most
recent arrival of HEC-GeoRAS bolsters the extraction of rise information from DTMs in either
the TIN or framework position.
GeoRAS requires that the client have a DTM. The DTM must be anticipated into a direction
system–the coordinate arrangement of the DTM is utilized as the premise for building up each
of the RAS Layers. GeoRAS likewise requires the Stream Centerline layer and Cross-Sectional
Cut Line layer be made. The advancement of every other Ra Layersis discretionary taking into
account the information requirements for the waterway power through pressure model.
Description of RAS LAYERS
RAS Layer Description
Stream Centerline Used to identify the connectivity of the river network and
assign river stations to computation points
Cross-Sectional
Cut Lines
Used to extract elevation transects from the DTM at specified
locations and other cross-sectional properties.
Bank Lines Used in conjunction with the cut lines to identify the main
channel from overbank areas.
Flow Path
Centerlines
Used to identify the center of mass of flow in the main channel
and overbanks to compute the downstream reach lengths
between cross sections.
4.2 TIN creation
Tin is defining the layer of earth which resulting from field surveying and take the deferent
elevation to topographic of earth by using the surveying instrument, after that is fixed by (GIS)
program. A multi-step procedure was used to create a TIN from multiple sources of elevation
data. The following steps were used,
� Generate a TIN in Arc GIS using the survey data exclusively (no DEM data for the
flood plain). The TIN generation is an automated GIS process that generates a
preliminary TIN whose exclusive purpose is to incorporate the survey data into a surface
for extraction into HEC-RAS.
� Digitize the centerline and bank lines of the river from satellite imagery. This step adds
additional information about river alignment and meandering that is not available in
the reaches between surveyed cross-sections.
� Delineate cross sections in GeoRAS/ArcGIS that correspond to surveyed cross section
locations, but that are confined within the bank-lines drawn instep2
� Extract the cross sections, bank lines, and river centerline to RAS. This step provides
HEC-RAS with all of the original cross-section data in a geo-referenced form.
� Interpolate additional cross sections at 600-meter spacing between surveyed cross
sections, following the river centerline, and export the cross sections to GeoRAS/
ArcGIS.
� Delineate break lines in ArcGIS at the centerline and at previously defined bank lines
with elevations defined by surveyed and interpolated cross-sections.
4.3 Creating the require layer under Hec-Geo Ras
The Stream Centerline layer is used to identify the connectivity of the river system. It is
created in the downstream direction and is used to assign river stations to the cross-sections,
bridges, and other structures to order computational nodes in the HEC-RAS model. The
Cross-Sectional Cut Lines layer is the principal data constructed using HEC-GeoRAS. Cut
lines are digitized across the flood plain area to capture the profile of the land surface. Cross-
sections should be digitized perpendicular to the path of flow in the channel and overbank are
as to be consistent with one- dimensional flow characteristics. Having created the bank lines
and flow path centerlines prior to laying out cut line locations is advantageous. Once the RAS
Layers have been created, GeoRAS tools and menus are available to assign and populate
attributed at Lastly, the data are written out to the HEC-RAS geo-spatial data exchange format
and can be imported into HEC-RAS.
The Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) has been used to derive the information within the
Hec-Georas environment. The layers developed using the TIN is shown below,
Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN)
4.4 HEC-RAS Model Development:
HEC-RAS is a one-dimensional river hydraulics model used for steady-flow and unsteady-
flow water surface profile computations though a network of open channels (HEC,2002).
Because HEC-RAS solves the full Saint-Venant equations, it is well suited for computing
the flood wave propagation resulting from a dam failure scenario.
Initial model development may be performed using HEC-GeoRAS and using an HEC-
RAS option to import the GIS data. At a minimum, the data import should establish the
river/reach schematic and the description of cross-sections. The river hydraulics model will
need additional cross-section in formation, hydraulic structures data, flow data, and
boundary conditions prior to simulation. This section will focus on just a few of the more
important data considerations.
4.5 Channel Data:
If the cross-sectional data came from a lower solution terrain model the channel data will not
be represented in the cross-section. For a large flood wave resulting from a dam break, the
channel data may not be significant. The importance of the channel portion of the total cross-
sectional conveyance will need to be evaluated: if the channel conveyance is rather small
compared with the total conveyance, for instance, the peak stage of the flood wave may not
be significantly affected. To perform the dam breach analysis, however, RAS will need a
channel for the low-flow portion of the simulation.
If channel data are available from previous hydraulic studies, HEC-RAS provides the
capability to merge data from two different geometry files. Using the channel merge
capabilities in RAS, channel data or overbank data can be merged with an existing data set.
If channel data is not available, it can be estimated from field surveys and topographic
maps. A shape may be estimated for uniform sections of channel and added to the overbank
data. HEC-RAS provides channel modification tools for quickly adding a trapezoidal
channel to cross-sections along a given river reach., the data extracted from the terrain
model are horizontal in the main channel reflecting the elevation of the water surface during
data capture. A trapezoidal channel is added based on an approximation or survey of water
depth, top width, and side-slopes.
4.6 Dam Break Modeling
� Generally, dam break modeling can be carried out by either i) scaled physical
hydraulic models, or ii) mathematical simulation using computer. A modern tool to
deal with this problem is the mathematical model, which is most cost effective and
reasonably solves the governing flow equations of continuity and momentum by
computer simulation.
� Mathematical modeling of dam breach floods can be carried out by either one
dimensional analysis or two-dimensional analysis. In one dimensional analysis, the
information about the magnitude of flood, i.e., discharge and water levels, variation
of these with time and velocity of flow through breach can be had in the direction of
flow. In the case of two-dimensional analysis, the additional information about the
inundated area, variation of surface elevation and velocities in two dimensions can
also be assessed.
� One dimensional analysis is generally accepted, when valley is long and narrow and
the flood wave characteristics over a large distance from the dam are of main interest.
On the other hand, when the valley widens considerably downstream of dam and large
area is likely to be flooded, two-dimensional analysis is necessary.
5. Results: Analysis and discussion
The study has been carried out for two flow conditions such as Steady and Un-steady flow, i.e.,
by using the return period flood and PMF generated for the basin respectively.
5.1 Data generation using the DEM and HEC-GEORAS
The modeling of dam breach requires the data such as; river cross sections, longitudinal
section of the river, and other river hydraulic characteristics. However, there were no data
available with regard to the river cross-section and longitudinal section of the river. In order
to obtain the details of river cross section and other details, an additional program called HEC-
GeoRAS has been used. This software basically derives all the required information to setup
the HEC-RAS model using the Digital Elevation Model (DEM). To facilitate such work, a
DEM generated BHUVAN was used (32 m resolution).
5.2 Procedure to derive the required information by HEC-GeoRAS.
The HEC-GeoRAS uses the TIN format of the DEM to derive the information. Therefore, the
DEM of Modikuntavagu Dam was converted into TIN format and is used to derive the required
data as explained below,
Digitizing River attributes in HEC-GEORAS.
� Add Data to ARC map, our study area in TIN format.
� Go to Ras geometry, create RAS layers- (Stream center line, Bank lines, Flow path
center line, XS cut lines).
� Shape files for all four to be created & digitize later one after the other. Assign left &
right orientation with respect to flow direction to flow paths.
� Enter river ID.Values of each shapefiles can be checked in attribute tables.
� Export RAS data (Ras layers on tin created in HECGEORAS) from RAS geometry.
5.3 Un-Steady flow Modeling
In the present study, the un-steady flow modeling has been carried out using the PMF generated
for the catchment. In this case, we have studied the two cases, (i) Reservoir empty and (ii)
Reservoir full conditions. The dam and the reservoir as represented in the HEC-RAS.
However, before we simulate the flood inundation for these conditions, it has to be
conceptualized how the dam would be breaching and the time taken for breaching after the
PMF enters into the reservoir. The conceptualization is done by providing the details of dam
breach and the boundary conditions.
Dam Breach Parameters
The assumptions regarding dam breach parameters are critical for dam break modelling. Thus,
reasonable values for the breach size and development time along with feasible breach
geometry are needed to make a realistic estimate of the outflow hydrographs. Nonetheless,
determining the size and growth rate for breaches is an inexact science while they are key
parameters in dam break models. Therefore, the estimation of the breach parameters yield a
significant source of uncertainty in the results and in turn downstream inundation extends.
Boundary Conditions
The assumptions regarding boundary conditions are also critical for dam break modelling as
they could directly affect extend of downstream floodwaters. Initial flows and water level
values, input hydrographs, and downstream boundary conditions, were specified to initialize
and run the dam break model. These boundary conditions must be properly selected and they
must best represent the site conditions. In this study the following conditions were considered;
(i) the inflow hydrographs for the upstream boundary; four extreme input hydrographs of
Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) flood was considered for the flood simulations; (ii)
downstream boundary conditions were established as the normal depth at the last cross-section
on the river.
Case (i): When Reservoir Empty
In this case, it is assumed that, the reservoir empty (no live storage) and PMF is approaching
the Dam. In order to simulate the situation. The HEC-RAS requires to be given the various
details of the DAM and EAC. This information is fed to the software and the program was
executed for simulating the flood situation.
Case (ii) Reservoir Full
In this case, it is assumed that, the reservoir is completely filled and PMF is approaching the
reservoir. As it is conceptualized that, the PMF will be routed on the first instance by using the
reservoir pool method and once the dam is breached, using the Muskingum method.
5.4 Flood Inundation Mapping
The flood plain in the study area for different scenarios like steady flow, unsteady flow, steady
flow with dam, unsteady flow with dam etc, is superimposed on IDW way of interpolation to
know water surface elevations (obtained after simulation in HEC-RAS) in the flood plain
region. Digitize the water surface elevations on similar elevations on contour format of study
area, create a polygon by joining the digitized water surface elevation, the area of polygon itself
will the area of inundation, same process to be carried for all scenarios to find area of
inundation.
CONCLUSION
Various techniques and assumptions are available for developing the key components of dam
breach model in HEC-RAS. The reservoir routing method, breach parameters, model used to
develop the breach hydrograph, inclusion or exclusion of bridges, method of modeling storage
in tributaries, and flow level in the receiving stream are just some of the factors that must be
considered in the analysis. Each of these affects the results to varying degrees and the impact
on one model may be different than on another.
In the present study, an attempt was made to simulate the flood inundation due to the breach of
the Modikuntavagu dam. The simulations were done for various scenarios to understand the
dynamics of the dam breach and to minimize the uncertainty in mapping the flood inundation.
The results obtained show that, the conceptualization with which the model was set-up looked
appropriate to the condition prevailing at the site. However, looking at the results obtained and
the discussion, following are some of the major conclusions drawn are;
(1) The HEC-RAS provides the flood profile for the worst flood intensity. This profile will
facilitate to adopt appropriate flood disaster mitigation measures.
(2) The flood profiles for different flood intensities with different return periods can be
plotted at any given cross section of river. Also, such flood profile can be plotted for
entire length of river reach.
(3) The major conclusion drawn from steady and unsteady flow analysis without
dam, Inundated area for steady flow state is 20 % more than unsteady flow.
Whereas for steady & unsteady flow analysis when dam breaks, area of
inundation for steady flow state is 8 % more than unsteady flow case.
( 4 ) The study also made the assessment of flood hazards with relation to the (100,
500, 1000 year) return period of floods and their water depth. The relationship between
the flood area and discharge indicates that there is a medium rate of increase of the
flood area with the increase in discharge.
RE
SUL
T: T
AB
LE
S A
ND
MA
PS
Sedi
men
t Loa
d at
Mod
ikun
tava
gu D
am
Aver
age
annual
net
yie
ld a
t M
odik
unta
vag
u D
am =
3.7
16 T
MC
Cat
chm
ent
area
upto
Modik
unta
vag
u d
am =
193.8
2 S
q.k
m
Rat
e of
silt
( 0
.05227 M
cft
/Sq. M
iles
/Yea
r) =
1.2
00 A
cft
/ S
q. M
ile/
Yea
r
Annual
Sed
imen
t lo
ad a
t M
odik
unta
vag
u d
am =
3.9
16 M
cft
Cap
acit
y a
t F
RL
+124.0
0M
t =
31
42.2
8 M
cft
(60.6
62 M
CM
)
Peri
od
in
Yea
rs
Cap
acity
at
the
end
of
the
peri
od
(in M
cft)
Ave
rage
net i
nflo
w
(in M
cft)
Cap
acity
/inflo
w
Tap
Eff
icie
ncy
Sedi
men
t loa
d
Cur
veA
vera
gePe
r ye
arT
rapp
ed
per
year
Tra
pped
in
25 Y
ears
Flow
ing
dow
n
Init
ial
21
42
.28
371
6.1
90
.58
97
.45
23
.91
63
.82
95
.40
0-2
52
04
6.8
83
71
6.1
90
.55
97
.24
59
7.3
49
3.9
16
3.8
19
5.3
02
.60
25
-50
19
51
.58
37
16
.19
0.5
39
7.1
07
97
.17
63
.91
63
.81
95
.13
2.7
6
Dam
Lo
cati
on w
ith U
pst
ream
and D
ow
n s
trea
m a
rea
Dam
Loc
atio
n
Des
ign
Floo
d C
alcu
latio
n
Tim
e (h
r)
UH
Ord
inat
es(c
ume
cs)
1.71
4 1.
71 4 2.
35 2 2.
35 2 2.
35 2 4.
26 6 4.
90 4 6.
85 4 11
.24
8 4.
90 4 3.
62 8 1.
714
0.4
36
0.4
36
0.4
36
1.70 2
1.70 2
1.70 2
1.70 2
1.70 2
1.70 8
1.70 2
1.70 2
0.4
36
DSRO
Ba
se
Flow
To
tal
Flow
0
0 0
0
11.6
4 11
.64
1 6.
3 10
.8
0
10
.8
11.6
4 22
.44
2 33
.3
57.0
8 10
.8
0
67.8
7 11
.64
79.5
1
3 84
.9
145.
52
57.0 8
14.8
25
0
21
7.4
1 11
.64
229.
05
4 13
0.45
22
3.5
98
145. 52
78.3 2
14.8
25
0
462.
25
11.6
4 47
3.89
5 10
3.1
176.
71
223. 59
119. 68
78.3 2
14.8
25
0
69
3.1
3 11
.64
704.
77
6 66
.1
113.
3 17
6. 71
306. 82
119. 68
78.3 2
26.8 8
0
901.
71
11.6
4 91
3.35
7 45
.5
77.9
9 11
3. 3 24
2. 49
306. 82
119. 68
142. 06
30.9
0
1113
.23
11
.64
1124
.87
8 30
.6
52.4
5 77
.9 1 15
5. 47
242. 49
306. 82
362. 18
163. 3
43.1 8
0
1403
.88
11
.64
1415
.52
9 90
.8
33.9
4 52
.4 5 10
7. 02
155. 47
242. 49
556. 5
416. 35
228. 24
70.8
6 0
1863
.31
11
.64
1874
.95
10
11.3
19
.37
33.9 5
71.9 7
107. 02
155. 47
439. 82
639. 73
581. 9
374.
56
30.9
0
24
54.
67
11.6
4 24
66.3
1
11
6.1
10.4
6 19
.3 7 46
.5 7 71
.9 7 10
7. 02
281. 98
507. 6
894. 1
954.
96
163. 3
22.8 6
0
30
78.
18
11.6
4 30
89.8
2
12
2.8
4.8
10.4 6
26.5 8
46.5 7
71.9 7
194. 1
324. 15
706. 6
1467
.3
416. 35
120. 81
10.8
0
34
00.
56
11.6
4 34
12.2
13
1.4
2.4
4.8
14.3 5
26.5 8
46.5 7
130. 54
223. 13
453. 05
1159
.67
63
9. 73
308. 02
57.0
8 2.
7 5 0
3068
.65
11
.64
3080
.29
14
0 0
2.4
6.59
14
.3 5 26
.5 8 84
.7 4 15
6. 06
311. 86
743.
49
507. 6
473. 27
145.
52
14.
52
2.7 5
0
2481
.46
11
.64
2493
.1
15
0 3.
29
6.59
14
.3 5 48
.2 1 97
.1
209. 73
511.
78
324. 15
374. 05
223.
598
37
.02
14
.52
2.
7 5 0
1867
.12
11
.64
1878
.76
16
0
3.29
6.
59
26.0 2
55.4 2
135. 71
344.
19
223. 13
239. 81
176.
71
56.
88
37.
02
14.
52
10.7 2
0
1330
11
.64
1341
.64
17
0 3.
29
11.9 4
29.9 1
77.4 5
221.
71
156. 06
156. 07
113.
3 44
.95
56
.88
37
.02
56
.6 8 10
.7 2 0
979.
99
11.6
4 99
1.63
18
0
5.97
13
.7 3 41
.8 1 12
7.1
97.1
11
1. 02
77.9
9 28
.82
44
.95
56
.88
14
4. 5 56
.6 8 10
.7 2 0
81
7.2
6 11
.64
828.
9
19
0 6.
87
19.1 9
68.6
1 55
.4 2 71
.8 3 52
.45
19.
84
28.
82
44.
95
222. 03
144. 5
56.6 8
10.7 2
0
80
1.9
11.6
4 81
3.54
20
0
9.6
31.4
9 29
.9 1 41
33
.94
13.
34
19.
84
28.
82
175. 48
222. 03
144. 5
56.6 8
10.7 2
0
817.
34
11.6
4 82
8.98
21
0 15
.75
13.7 3
22.1 3
19.3
7 8.
6 3 13
.34
19
.84
11
2. 5 17
5. 48
222. 03
144. 5
56.6 8
10.7 6
0
83
4.7
3 11
.64
846.
37
22
0
6.87
10
.1 6 10
.46
4.9 3
8.6 3
13.
34
77.4 4
112. 5
175. 48
222. 03
144. 5
56.8 8
10.7 2
0
853.
92
11.6
4 86
5.56
23
0 5.
08
4.8
2.6 6
4.9 3
8.6 3
52.0 8
77.4 4
112. 5
175. 48
222. 03
145. 01
56.6 8
10.7 2
0 87
8.0
3 11
.64
889.
67
Tim
e (h
r)
UH
Ord
inat
es(c
ume
cs)
1.71
4 1.
71 4 2.
35 2 2.
35 2 2.
35 2 4.
26 6 4.
90 4 6.
85 4 11
.24
8 4.
90 4 3.
62 8 1.
714
0.4
36
0.4
36
0.4
36
1.70 2
1.70 2
1.70 2
1.70 2
1.70 2
1.70 8
1.70 2
1.70 2
0.4
36
DSRO
Ba
se
Flow
To
tal
Flow
24
0
2.4
1.2 2
2.6 6
4.9 3
33.7
52
.0 8 77
.4 4 11
2. 5 17
5. 48
222. 81
144. 5
56.6 8
2.7 5
889.
14
11.6
4 90
0.78
25
0 0.
6 1 1.
2 2 2.
6 6 19
.2 3 33
.7
52.0 8
77.4 4
112. 5
176. 09
222. 03
144. 5
14.
52
856.
59
11.6
4 86
8.23
26
0
0.6 1
1.2 2
10.3 8
19.2 3
33.7
52
.0 8 77
.4 4 11
2. 9 17
5. 48
222. 03
37.
02
742.
09
11.6
4 75
3.73
27
0 0.
6 1 4.
77
10.3 8
19.2 3
33.7
52
.0 8 77
.7 1 11
2. 5 17
5. 48
56.
88
543.
34
11.6
4 55
4.98
28
0
2.38
4.
77
10.3 8
19.2 3
33.7
52
.2 6 77
.4 4 11
2. 5 44
.95
35
7.6
2 11
.64
369.
26
29
0 2.
38
4.77
10
.3 8 19
.2 3 33
.8 2 52
.0 8 77
.4 4 28
.82
22
8.9
2 11
.64
240.
56
30
0
2.38
4.
77
10.3 8
19.3
33
.7
52.0 8
19.
84
142.
45
11.6
4 15
4.09
31
0 2.
38
4.77
10
.4 2 19
.2 3 33
.7
13.
34
83.8
4 11
.64
95.4
8
32
0
2.38
4.
78
10.3 8
19.2 3
8.6 3
45.4
1 11
.64
57.0
5
33
0 2.
39
4.77
10
.3 8 4.
9 3 22
.47
11.6
4 34
.11
34
0
2.38
4.
77
2.6 6
9.81
11
.64
21.4
5
35
0 2.
38
1.2 2
3.6
11.6
4 15
.24
36
0
0.6 1
0.61
11
.64
12.2
5 37
0
0 11
.64
11.6
4
Gra
phic
al R
epre
sent
atio
n of
Des
ign
Floo
d
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
01
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
1415
1617
1819
2021
2223
2425
2627
2829
3031
3233
3435
3637
3839
Total Flow in Cumecs
Tim
e (h
r)
Des
ign
Floo
d
Vill
ages
falls
unde
r th
e In
unda
ted
area
of D
owns
trea
m o
f Mod
ikun
tava
gu D
am
�T
ekula
gudem
Z
�T
ekula
gudem
Chal
k –
II
�K
rish
nap
ura
ng
�P
eddag
angar
am Z
�P
eruru
G
�D
har
mav
aram
�P
eruru
Z
�A
yyav
arip
eta
G