004 the mysteriousartandscienceofknowledge-workerperformance_ver1.0
description
Transcript of 004 the mysteriousartandscienceofknowledge-workerperformance_ver1.0
The Mysterious Art and Science of
Knowledge-Worker Performance
Thomas H. Davenport, Robert J. Thomas
and Susan Cantrell
Thus far, researchers and managers alike
have a very limited understanding of
what makes knowledge workers tick.
But by manipulating two key leverage
points, companies can begin to shift the
balance from art toward science.
Introduction
Peter DruckerInsisted on the need to pay more attention to knowledge work and the people doing such work.
Knowledge work
We are in the year 2000 roughly where we were in the year 1900 in terms of the productivity of the manual worker.
understanding of knowledge-worker productivity
Henry FordFrederick Taylor
Manual work
No Frederick Taylor or Henry Ford
Most businesspeople today would agree with Drucker about the importance of knowledge work
1. Knowledge work is at the heart of innovation
2. Recruiting and retaining the best knowledge workers are vital to organizational success
3. 3. Focus on knowledge-worker performance is
a way of uniting what are often separate tasks,such as strategic planning, organizational design and IT investment
The problem of knowledge-worker performance
1. One that is too sweet to ignore
2. Sweet problems are not always tractable
3. Truly sweet problems may require the creation of radically new concepts and toosl before they can be solved
Agenda
1. Identify the five key issues
2. Framework
that they saw companies struggling with in their handling of
knowledge work.
that can help organizations think more clearly about how they
might go about improving knowledge-worker performance
Identify the five key issues
The five key issues1. The determinants of knowledge-worker performance are
becoming clear. How to integrate them remains murky
2. Many organizations resist the idea that segmentation of knowledge workers is necessary
3. No one seems to own the problem of knowledge-workerperformance
4. Companies are experimenting heavily with workplace redesign, but they aren't learning very much
5. There is great reluctance to alter knowledge work, especially at the high end
The determinants of
How to integrate
knowledge-worker performance are
becoming clear.
them remains murky.
1st Issue
Management
information technology
workplace design
determinants of white-collar productivity
Ex. Information Technology
communication
collaboration
Knowledgemanagement
Virtual teaming
Instant messaging
Integrate
Functional equivalent of a software Swiss army knife
Few have figured out how to get knowledge workers to actually use these tools
It all amounts to expensive e-mail
Informationtechnology
Workplacedesign
The Still emerging discipline of knowledge management awaits a model or methodology that can bridge the space between IT, workplace design business strategy and people management
Business strategyPeople management
Many organizations resist that
is necessary
segmentation of
2nd Issue
knowledge workers
One major obstacle in the way of developing a useful model lies in the generic use of
“knowledge worker.”
Can an organization apply
the same solutions?
Can it transfer
Managers weren't ready to Differentiate their employees
Some managers were concerned about
perceptions of elitism in their organization
Others felt that segmentation might contradict
implicit notions of meritocracy
Authors found substantial differences among the types of people who are called knowledge workers,and advocates of some degree of segmentation.
Variety of objections
No one seems to own the problem of
3rd Issue
knowledge-worker performance.
What function
to improvingknowledge-worker performance?
Contributes
Who is
responsiblefor enabling higher levers of
knowledge-worker performance?
Can't find the timeThey are expected to focus on current performance
Ex. HR and IT professionals
HR
Line
managerIT
Fear the disruption of
existing work
A keen interest in optimizing
knowledge work
members
Can’t effectively own the problem
Crossing paths with several staff group
Workplace
resource
HR
IT
Someone does get the inspiration to
do something innovative in the way
knowledge work is organized
Get evaluated on criteria like cost per square
foot rather than whether it has created space
that contributes to innovation
The HR department might be more
interested in tinkering with compensation
and benefits – conventional fixes designed
to raise productivity
IT doesn’t like the kinds of solutions that
knowledge-worker teams relish, such as
peer-to-peer networking software(which can
threaten system security)
Ex. Cisco Systems
HR
Executive
FinanceITWorkplace
resource
Overseen
Meets biweekly to ensure collaboration aimed at
improving employees productivity and satisfaction
The team devised and implemented a new workplace design, as well
as guidelines that allow individuals to choose from a variety of work
settings to support their needs for collaborative, private or mobile work
Companies are experimenting heavily withworkplace design, but they
aren't learning very much
4th Issue
Faith
Measures, controls, hypotheses and even recording of lessons learned are often lacking
Fashion Finance
Fad
Intend to nourish social life at work
Hearths
Cappuccino bar
Indoor boulevard
Creativity room
Talk plaza
There is little evidence that any particular design increases informal meetings
Attempt to increase the likelihood of informal interaction
Social spaces are often empty
Ex. Corning R&D group
Director makes a point of showing up regularly for the twice-a-day coffee breaks in the
“creativity room”
Encourage collaboration
Open-plan environment
IT support for knowledge workers
Personal devices are popular but not
well integrated into the corporate
information environment
Artificial intelligence and expert systems have never taken off
because of difficulties of knowledge representation and
system maintenance
Their is great reluctance to alter knowledge work, especially at the high end
5th Issue
Knowledge work itself can often seem impervious to change, much less to rationalization
Sometimes knowledge workers themselves are the ones resisting change
Two dominant approaches to the design and management of knowledge work
1. Process perspective
2. Practice perspective
that works from the assumption that engineering principles can
be applied to all forms of work
emphasizes the implicit coordination and exploration that
produces things to do
Process perspectivenow1980s – 1990s
structured
linear
repetitive
Repeatable processes in a growing number of less
structured tasks
Order fulfillmentBenefits administration
InvoicingAccounts management
Product design
Ex. Partners HealthCare
real-time IT system
Relevant information and
suggestions that the doctor may
or may not choose to accept
Constantly updated
Enter an order for a
test or a medicine
Database
Histories
Clinical information
Practice perspectivePracticeProcess
HierarchicalExplicit command-and-control
Implicit coordination
The structure that gets things done exploration that produces things to do
Hire smart people and leave them alone
Ex. IDEO
If your put a good project manager together with the right people, the project will be good
Recruit and assembling the right team
Organizational approach
IDEO's structure is relatively flat and the visible perquisites of hierarchy are few
Because high-end-knowledge workers tend to dislike hierarchy
Blend of process and practice
Continuously iterated prototyping process may be the right mixture of practice and process
Toward More ProductiveKnowledge Work
1. It is mistake to lump all knowledge workers into one category
2. Some degree of choice in how and where to work goes a long way toward making knowledge workers happy
Framework
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Low
Modera
teH
igh
Low Moderate High
Degree of Choice
Degre
e o
f S
egm
enta
tion
Mandatory
specialization
Modular
made-to-orderOne-size-fits-one
Fixed
typologies
Configurable
categories
Individualized
segmentation
One-size-fits-allMass
customization
Mass
personalization
Segmenting Work EnvironmentsLow
Segmentation
Moderate
Segmentation
High
Segmentation
Companies with a low level of segmentation provide one standard work setting for all
employees
Companies group their employees into a limited number of categories and define work
settings for each.
Specifically tailored to small groups of people on a one-off basis
Inexpensive efficient Produce a misfit
Familiar categorization schemes
Enables tiger degree of fit expensive Time-consuming
Providing individual ChoiceLow Choice
Moderate
Choice
High Choice
Work environments are fixed and immutable
Employees cannot configure their workstations or work at home as they see fit
Some companies will allow their employees to make some choice, but only within a menu
of defined options
A few companies allow their knowledge workers to determine numerous aspects of their
own work settings
Employees may be encouraged to purchase their own furniture or technology solutions
Easy to manage Don’t necessarily save money
Real budgetary limitationsAlign work styles and preferences
Choosing a Solution
How
homogeneousis your organization?
How
importantis it for your organization
to align knowledge workers’
need and their work settings?
What level of resources are you willing to dedicate?
Closing
Whichever solution one choose, it won't work if it isn't carefully implemented
It must be remembered, that all solutions eventually fail
Organization therefore monitor the changing needs of their knowledge workers and keep abreast of how new technologies may enable new ways of working
No one has all the answers on how to improve knowledge work, but managers shouldn't feel paralyzed
They are correct not to attempt to engineer or program knowledge work, but that doesn't mean such work lacks structure, cyclicality or leverage points for change
The keys are to maintain a balance between process and practice, to treat workers doing different kinds of work in appropriate ways, and to focus on more than simply hiring better knowledge workers