0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for...

14
1 1 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments

Transcript of 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for...

Page 1: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

1 1

Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist

Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy:some comments

Page 2: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

2 2

Relative unit labour costs have risen sharply

Trade-weighted relative unit labour costs in manufacturing

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

Inde

x, 1

991

=10

0

Italy France Germany Spain

Page 3: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

3 3

…notably vis-à-vis Germany

Relative unit labour costs in manufacturing vis a vis Germany

60

70

80

90

100

110

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

Inde

x, 1

991

=10

0

Italy France Spain

Page 4: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

4 4

The deterioration in the trade balance has affected more intra than extra euro-area trade

Italian trade balance as a % of GDP

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

EU-12 Rest of the world

Page 5: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

5 5

Labour productivity has stalled over the past decade

Labour productivity (total economy)

100

105

110

115

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Inde

x, 1

991

=10

0

Italy France Germany

Page 6: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

6 6

Nominal wages have grown faster than in Germany

Nominal compensation per employee in business sector

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Inde

x, 1

991

=10

0

Italy France Germany

Page 7: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

7 7

Inflation has been relatively high and persistent

Consumer price deflator

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Inde

x, 1

991

=10

0

Italy France Germany

Page 8: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

8 8

Real labour cost have declined

Real compensation per employee in business sector

90

95

100

105

110

115

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Inde

x, 1

991

=10

0

Italy France Germany

Page 9: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

9 9

Is the quality of trade specialisation deteriorating?

Dynamic simulation of a standard export equation over 1982-2006

1.00E+11

1.50E+11

2.00E+11

2.50E+11

3.00E+11

3.50E+11

4.00E+11

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Ex

po

rts

- V

olu

me

- e

uro

s 2

00

0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Italian exports volume

Italian exports volume simulated

Page 10: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

10 10OECD

Product market regulation remains strict in Italy despite substantial liberalisation

Product market regulation in OECD economies

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

1998 2003

Page 11: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

11 11

Cross-country differences in PMR may have contributed to divergent productivity trends

1. Adjusted for hours worked.2. Indicator of economy-wide regulation excluding barriers to international trade and investment. The indicator ranges from 0 to 6, from least to most restrictive. See Nicoletti et al. (1999).

United StatesSweden

Spain

Portugal

New Zealand

Netherlands

Japan

Italy

Ireland

Greece

Germany

France

Finland

Denmark

Canada

Belgium

Australia

-2.5

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0.3 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.8 3.3

Difference in average MFP growth rate between 1990-2000 and 1980-1990 1

Correlation coefficient -0.51t-statistic -2.29

Product market regulation, inward oriented2, 1998

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

United Kingdom

Page 12: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

12 12

Employment protection legislation remains stringent in international comparison

Stringency of employment protection legislation1 in selected OECD countries, 2003

GRCFRAESPPRT

1. Index scale of 0-6 from least to most restrictive.

0

1

2

3

4

US

A

GB

R

CA

N

CH

E

IRL

AU

S

DN

K

NZ

L

JPN

AU

T

ITA

FIN

NLD

BE

LS

WE

DE

U

GR

C

FR

A

ES

P

PR

T

Page 13: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

13 13

Italy ranks low in terms of PhD graduates and business sector researchers

Page 14: 0 0 Jean-Philippe Cotis, OECD Chief Economist Competitiveness and structural policy challenges for Italy: some comments.

14 14

Italy has a much larger share of low-skilled workers than most other OECD countries