© The Federal Market Group March 2003 3-1 The Business Case — the Proposal, the Estimate, and...
-
Upload
loreen-montgomery -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of © The Federal Market Group March 2003 3-1 The Business Case — the Proposal, the Estimate, and...
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
3-1
The Business Case — the Proposal, the Estimate, and Cash Flows
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
2
Discussion Objectives
By the end of this discussion, you will be able to — Understand the purpose of the business case financial
proposal Select the most appropriate estimating method and
technique to determine the cost estimate Determine the impact of cash in-flows and out-flows on
the success of your project or contract
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
3-3
The Business Case Proposal
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
4
What Is the Business Case Financial Proposal? The business case financial proposal is a document prepared by an organization for the purpose of determining whether or not a proposed business venture should be selected.
Purpose: To set forth the financial and non-financial reasons supporting the proposed venture.
Content: Contains both financial and non-financial data to provide decision makers with relevant, timely, and useful information needed to make the right decision.
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
5
The Components of the Business Case Financial Proposal Non-financial
Description of the endeavor
Market– or organization–specific business analysis
Customer analysis Competitor analysis Strategic importance of
the proposed effort Key success factors Non-standard terms or
conditions desired by the customer
Financial Financial statements
Income Statement Balance Sheet Cash Flows
Financial Impacts and Timing Revenue Profit Investment Cash flow (in-flow and
out-flow)
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
6
Non-Financial Business Case Support Data
Project description: high-level description of the effort being proposed and the business reason(s) giving rise to its need
Market– or organization– specific business impacts of the proposed efforts — short-term and long-term Description of the market-place impacts, if the
endeavor is approved or not approved Impact on affiliated organizations, if the endeavor is
approved or not approved Impact on the organization, if the endeavor is
approved or not approved
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
7
Non-Financial Business Case Support Data (continued)
Customer impacts Historical analysis of recent proposals to this
customer Analysis of the customer business need giving rise
to this proposal Identification of additional opportunities for the
specific customer and other related customers Competition impacts
Analysis of competitor products/services related to the current proposed effort
Historical analysis of recent competitor pricing on similar efforts
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
8
Non-Financial Business Case Support Data (continued)
Strategic importance of proposed effort Market-place considerations affecting pricing
issues on the proposed project Fit with corporate longer–term strategic plan
Key success factors Identification of key assumptions incorporated into
the technical, cost, and management proposals Identification of key risks – downside and upside –
which may affect project profitability Operational buy-in as to performance and schedule
criteria
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
9
Non-Financial Business Case Support Data (continued)
Non-standard terms and conditions desired by the customer Analysis of financial and business operations
impacts if the customer’s non-standard terms and conditions are accepted
Business unit specialist sign-off of non-standard terms/condition analyses
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
10
The Business Case Financial Proposal
The business case financial contains both financial and business documentation for use in decision-making
The financial form usually is presented as a detailed cost budget with an accompanying income statement, balance sheet, and statement of cash flows Usually budgets are monthly forecasts for the
current and the next year, quarterly for the second through third years, and annual thereafter
The business documentation presents the underlying reasons indicating why the proposal should be accepted and any risks associated with that acceptance
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
11
Business Case Financial — Cost Budget2002 American Aerospace Companies, Inc.
Business Case Financial Proposal 02-NNNN
Cost Budget - Proposed Expenditure Profile
Rate Jan Feb Mar Apr Oct Nov Dec Total
Direct Materials - 6,000 * 200,000 - - - - 206,000
Material Acquisition 5.00% - 300 * 10,000 - - - - 10,300
Direct Labor
Engineer I 30.00$ 24,000 * 48,000 * 24,000 * - - - - 96,000
Engineer II 45.00$ 9,000 * 18,000 * 9,000 * - - - - 36,000
Manufacturing I 15.00$ - 7,500 * 15,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 15,000 277,500
Manufacturing II 21.00$ - 6,300 * 10,500 21,000 21,000 21,000 10,500 195,300
Engineering Overhead 180.00% 59,400 * 118,800 * 59,400 * - - - - 237,600
Manufacturng Overhead 250.00% - 34,500 * 63,750 127,500 127,500 127,500 63,750 1,182,000
Other Direct Costs
Travel 3,000 * 12,000 * 6,000 * 21,000
Subtotal 95,400 251,400 397,650 178,500 178,500 178,500 89,250 2,261,700
General & Administrative 8.00% 7,632 20,112 31,812 14,280 14,280 14,280 7,140 180,936
Total Costs 103,032 271,512 429,462 192,780 192,780 192,780 96,390 2,442,636
Direct Labor Hours Engineer I 800 1,600 800 - - - - 3,200 Engineer II 200 400 200 - - - - 800 Manufacturing I - 500 1000 2000 2000 2000 1000 18,500 Manufacturing II - 300 500 1000 1000 1000 500 9,300
*Development Costs to be Amortized 95,400 251,400 98,400 - - - - 445,200
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
12
Business Case Financial — Balance Sheet
2002 American Aerospace Companies, Inc.
Business Case Financial Proposal 02-NNNN
Proposed Balance Sheet
Dec '01 Jan '02 Feb '02 Mar '02 Apr '02 Oct '02 Nov '02 Dec '02 Jan '03
Assets
Cash - - - - - - - 105,329 306,548
Accounts Receivable - - - - 360,000 360,000 300,000 360,000 -
Inventory
Direct Material - - 6,000 200,000 176,000 44,000 24,000 - -
Material Acquisition - - 300 10,000 8,800 2,200 1,200 - -
Direct Labor - Production - - 13,800 25,500 21,420 24,480 29,580 - -
Overhead - Production - - 34,500 63,750 53,550 61,200 73,950 - -
Direct Labor - Engineering - 33,000 99,000 - - - - - -
Overhead - Engineering - 59,400 178,200 - - - - - -
Other Direct Costs - 3,000 15,000 - - - - - -
Amortizable Development Costs - - - 445,200 391,776 97,944 53,424 - -
Total Inventory - 95,400 346,800 744,450 651,546 229,824 182,154 - -
Total Identifiable Assets - 95,400 346,800 744,450 1,011,546 589,824 482,154 465,329 306,548
Liabilities and EquityWages and Accounts Payable - 46,695 124,949 296,701 70,176 70,176 70,176 35,088 - Income Taxes Payable - (3,434) (12,484) (26,799) 6,643 60,240 87,038 123,693 - Line of Credit - 56,337 249,595 507,305 926,610 230,413 63,193 - Total Liabilities - 99,598 362,060 777,207 1,003,429 360,829 220,407 158,781 - Retained Earnings - (4,198) (15,260) (32,757) 8,117 228,995 261,747 306,548 306,548 Total Equity - (4,198) (15,260) (32,757) 8,117 228,995 261,747 306,548 306,548 Total Liabilities and Equity - 95,400 346,800 744,450 1,011,546 589,824 482,154 465,329 306,548
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
13
Business Case Financial — Cash Flows
2002 American Aerospace Companies, Inc.
Business Case Financial Proposal 02-NNNN
Proposed Statement of Cash Flows - By Month
Jan '02 Feb '02 Mar '02 Apr '02 Oct '02 Nov '02 Dec '02 FY 02
Operating Activities
Net Income (4,198) (11,062) (17,497) 40,874 40,874 32,752 44,801 306,548
Adjustments to reconcile income from
operations to net cash from operations
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable - - - (360,000) (60,000) 60,000 (60,000) (360,000)
Inventory (95,400) (251,400) (397,650) 92,904 92,904 47,670 182,154 -
Wages and accounts Payable 46,695 78,254 171,752 (226,525) - - (35,088) 35,088
Income taxes payable (3,434) (9,050) (14,315) 33,442 33,442 26,798 36,655 123,693
Net Cash Flows from Operations (56,337) (193,258) (257,710) (419,305) 107,220 167,220 168,522 105,329
Investing Activities
None
Financing ActivitiesChange in Line of Credit Borrowings 56,337 193,258 257,710 419,305 (107,220) (167,220) (63,193) - Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities 56,337 193,258 257,710 419,305 (107,220) (167,220) (63,193) - Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash - - - - - - 105,329 105,329 Cash at the Beginning of the Period - - - - - - - - Cash at the End of the Period - - - - - - 105,329 105,329
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
14
Key Points on the Business Case Financial Proposal
Although business case financial presentations may NOT achieve the desired financial results, in some cases non-financial reasons will drive the organization to undertake the endeavor
The success or failure of a business proposition relies on the integrity of the data presented AND the honesty with which the underlying non-financial and financial data is set forth
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
3-15
The Cost Estimate
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
16
The Role of Costs and Pricing
Your costs are your costs are your costs. Pricing is a business decision. Eliminating activities from pricing consideration does not mean those costs go away – you will pay for those costs out of your profits
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
17
Why Are Estimates Necessary?
Estimates provide — The basis for deciding if a project/contract should be
authorized to proceed The baseline by which project/contract expenditures
can be measured, tracked and controlled The management tool by which a project/contract
manager can evaluate project decisions
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
18
Types of Estimates
Order of magnitude Precision: +75%/-25% Normally used for quick estimates, without much
research Preliminary (budgetary)
Precision: +25%/-10% Used for strategic plans, also referred to as the top-
down estimate Definitive (detailed engineering)
Precision: +10%/-5% Used for contract proposals or modifications, also
known as the bottoms-up estimate
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
19
Estimating Best Practices
Practical estimates are — Based upon historical fact Consistent with corporate strategic plans Prepared based upon a consistently applied
methodology (optimally through the use of templates) Realistic, since they are based upon likely conditions Based upon documented assumptions related to the
project staff, the technical work to be performed, and working conditions likely to be found
Team-based Identified as to date and time of preparation Incorporate risk factors
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
20
Cost Estimating Methods
Cost estimating methods may rely on any of the following methods — Detailed engineering Analogy Parametric techniques
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
21
Cost Estimation Process Approach
Determine project requirements
Develop the WBS
Identify project resources
Develop initial schedule based upon resources
Prepare initial estimate based upon resources and schedule
Adjust schedule and resources based upon proposed contract
Re-estimate the project based upon the adjustments
PERFORM RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
Contract AwardBaseline the schedule and estimate with stakeholders
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
22
Detailed Engineering Estimate
A detailed engineering estimate will incorporate the following elements into the proposal Identification of the work to be done The timing at which the work must be done Identification of the human resources who will perform
the work and the level of effort required (hours, days, weeks, or months)
The direct cost of the human resources Identification of materials and subcontract The direct cost of non-human resources
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
23
Detailed Engineering Estimate (continued)
Identification of other direct costs to be incurred in support of the effort and the timing of such costs
The amounts of indirect costs to be applied to estimated direct costs
Adjustment of the estimate for identified risks Identification of profit to be proposed, subject to the
existence or non-existence of competition
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
24
Analogy
Analogy is an estimating method which uses a past project which is similar to the current proposed effort
Obtain the statistical and cost data for the past project Determine the differences between the prior effort and
the current proposed effort in the areas of Technology Complexity Miniaturization Quantity Inflation
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
25
Analogy (continued)
For each identified difference, provide a technical assessment as to the percentage change that would be applied to the prior data
Quantity adjustments are the second last factor to be addressed and inflation factors are the final factor to be addressed.
Non-cost data can be affected by all factors, except inflation
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
26
Analogy Example
Three years ago, we performed a project which required 8,000 labor hours which had a fully loaded labor rate of $75 per hour for 100 units. We have been asked to perform the project again this year for 120 units.
Finance has indicated that the inflation rate for each of the last 3 years has averaged 3.5%.
Engineering has made the following technical assessment Technical changes would have reduced the effort by
10% Miniaturization impacts would have increased the effort
by 3%
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
27
Analogy Example (continued)
Analogy ExampleAdjustment Hours Rate Cost
Original Project 8,000 75.00$ 600,000.00$ Adjustment Technical Changes -10.00% (800) Miniaturization Impacts 5.00% 400 Subtotal 7,600
Quantity Adjustment1 20.00% 1,520
Inflation Adjustment2 10.87% 8.15 9,120 83.15$ 758,328.00$
1Quantity adjustment: (New qty - old qty)/Old qty = (120-100)/100
2Inflation adjustment: This is a future value problem. The compounded inflation factor for 3.5% for three years is 10.87%. Calculated as [=ROUND((1+.035)^3,2)-1]. If Finance had a fully loaded rate, that rate would have been used instead of the calculated rate.
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
28
Parametric Estimating
Parametric estimating is an estimation method which utilizes either a physical or performance characteristic as the basis for the estimate
The characteristic chosen should be the one which is most responsible for the cost of the item or the service
Parametric estimates are developed through mathematic models, known as cost estimating relationships (CERs). Knowing the value of the characteristic can provide insight into the value of the item
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
29
Parametric Estimating (continued)
Examples of parametric estimates Road construction is driven primarily by the number of
lane miles New home construction is driven by square footage Software cost has two examples —
Most recent: Function point Early 1990’s: Lines of code
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
30
Resource Utilization and Planning
Resources who are available for use on the project affect project estimates in either one or two ways — Productivity Availability
Productivity addresses the amount of work which can be provided over time and is often a function of knowledge and/or experience of the resource — Lower productivity results in longer activity durations Higher productivity results in shorter activity durations
Availability addresses the impact on the elapsed time over which an activity must be performed, since no work can be accomplished during periods of non-availability.
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
31
Estimating Tools — Averages
Many estimates rely on the use of averages Arithmetic mean Median Mode
Best practices — Calculate averages, since the outcome and comparison of those averages might be useful in determining an estimate
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
32
Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is used to estimate effort or costs by identifying a relationship between two variables, one of which is independent
Knowledge of the relationship of the variables, one of which is an independent variable, enables the projection as to the value of the dependent variable
The mathematical method,known as the method of the least squares, is easily computed using Excel tools.
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
33
Regression Analysis — Example
Data
1993 $18,500
1994 19,000
1995 19,500
1996 20,400
1997 20,800
1998 21,300
1999 21,800
2000 22,500
2001 23,000
2002 ?
24,00024,000
23,50023,500
23,00023,000
22,50022,500
22,00022,000
21,50021,500
21,00021,000
20,50020,500
20,00020,000
19,50019,500
19,00019,000
18,50018,500
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 0293 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
34
Example Using Regression in Excel
Year X Y In Excel: Select Tools, then Data
1993 -4 18500 A drop down menu will appear, scroll down and select Regression1994 -3 19000 A pop-up menu will appear1995 -2 19500 Insert the range for the dependent variable (Y) (dotted range)1996 -1 20400 Insert the range for the independent variable (X) (solid range)1997 0 208001998 1 21300 Substitute the values in the equation Y = a+bx1999 2 21800 where: Y = Answer2000 3 22500 a = Intercept 20755.5562001 4 23000 b = X Variable 1 566.666672002 5 ? x = the X value for 2002 5
SUMMARY OUTPUT Y = 20755.556 + (566.6667 x 5)Y = 23,589 , or 23,600
Regression StatisticsMultiple R 0.998045R Square 0.9960938Adjusted R Square 0.9955357Standard Error 103.8925Observations 9
ANOVAdf SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 19266666.67 19266667 1785 1.08581E-09Residual 7 75555.55556 10793.651Total 8 19342222.22
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%Intercept 20755.556 34.63083211 599.33748 9.507E-18 20673.66671 20837.444 20673.667 20837.444X Variable 1 566.66667 13.4124636 42.24926 1.086E-09 534.9512526 598.38208 534.95125 598.38208
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
35
The Use of “Fudge” Factors
Realistic estimates is one of the most problematic issues facing project managers around the world
Project costs are often over-estimated due to the following reasons: “My manager always cuts 15% out of my
estimates.” “I want to make sure that I can stay within my
estimate, so I will add 20% to my best estimate.” The result: Estimates which are overstated.
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
36
Normal Estimating Methods by Type of Cost Material
Vendor estimate Analogy Parametric
Direct Labor Bottoms up (labor effort x
labor rate) Analogy (effort and rates)
Subcontract Effort Vendor estimate Analogy
Other Direct Costs Travel (bottoms up by
travel component) Overhead and General & Administrative (G&A) Annual overhead estimate
prorated to labor or material base used in contract
Annual G&A estimate prorated to total costs used in contract
Normally prepared by financial organization
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
37
Ensuring a Valid Estimate — Best Practices
Review the solicitation to determine if the proposal meets the requirements
Document all constraints and assumptions Understand both your organization’s AND your
customer’s ground rules Document the sources of the cost data Ensure compliance of the estimating methodology with
the ground rules Always compare your estimate with other established
data – a sanity check Consider the impacts of risk in the estimate
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
38
Key Points Related to Cost Estimates
Costs are costs are costs, but pricing is a business decision Three estimating types often used in today’s business
include (in the order of precision from lowest to highest) Order of magnitude Preliminary Detailed
The most frequently used methods in completing estimates are: Detailed engineering Parametric estimating Analogy
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
39
Key Points Related to Cost Estimates (continued)
Estimates are often based upon averages – where ever possible averages should be calculated to provide insight as to possible activity outcomes
Productivity and availability affect the duration of activities, but only productivity has a direct effect on the costs
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
3-40
Cash Flows
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
3-41
CASH IS KING!CASH IS KING!
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
42
Costs Incurred — Reality Check
Typically, costs must be incurred before revenues are collected to offset the cash expended Direct Labor costs – outflows every payroll period Direct Material and Subcontract costs – outflows within
30-45 days of receipt (dependent on bi-lateral agreement)
Other Direct Costs – outflows within 15-30 days of receipt (dependent on bi-lateral agreement)
Overhead and G&A costs (except depreciation) – outflows in the same fashion as their related direct labor, direct material, or subcontract costs
Depreciation is a non-cash expense – original investment (carried on the balance sheet) required the cash outlay
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
43
Cost Incurred — Reality Check
Between the time the cost is incurred and the payment is made, the liability is either recorded in Accounts Payable (for non-internal labor related costs) or in Wages Payable (for internal labor costs). These liabilities are reduced when payment is made.
Directly associated costs of the endeavor (direct material, direct labor, subcontracts, and other direct costs, and all related overhead costs – excluding G&A – are transferred to inventory (balance sheet account), until the sale is recorded
Unless there is internal funding provided by the organization or financing provided by the customer, the endeavor will not even get off the ground because cash is required to pay the bills within a reasonable amount of time!
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
44
Balance Sheet Impacts on Cash Flows
When a sale is generated to the customer, revenue is recognized (sales), inventory is reduced (by charging cost of sales), and the amount of the invoice is recorded as Accounts Receivable (an asset on the balance sheet). How long will the customer take before generating
the payment? Will the length of time taken by the customer be less than the amount of time before the costs which make up that invoice are due to be paid?
Inventory which represents costs directly associated with the endeavor cannot be relieved until revenue is recognized
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
45
Balance Sheet Impacts on Cash Flows (continued)
Balances in the inventory and accounts receivable accounts represent investments by the organization in the contract effort – the quicker the customer pays for the effort, the quicker those investments can be converted into cash, which will permit continued operations. If internal funding is not available, then customer financing may be an attractive alternative: Advance payments – payments received prior to
the start of work Progress payments – payments received based
upon the expenditure of costs Milestone payments – payments received based
upon the completion of pre-defined objectives
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
46
Balance Sheet Impacts on Cash Flows (continued)
Some projects require investments in fixed assets, which are depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. As these investments are depreciated, the costs are recovered as part of the overhead cost recovered in the sales price. Customers rarely pay for these costs directly. In order to generate payment for these assets
earlier than the time over which they are depreciated, projects must generate a profit (the excess of project revenues over project costs) to permit early payment or the organization must fund the acquisition through internal funding or borrowing.
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
47
Key Points on Cash In-Flows
Maximizing the receipt of cash before completing work Advance payments Progress payments Milestone payments
Insisting on payment within 30 days of completing work Minimizing terms which require payment with
conditions after delivery, unless compensation for the time value of money is incorporated into the price Acceptance tests after delivery Long payment terms (more than 30 days)
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
48
Key Points on Cash In-Flows (continued)
Use of electronic funds transfers Billing more than once a month (mid-month or every
other week) Advance payments on larger orders C.O.D. payments for customers with records of
payment delinquencies Timely deposit of cash receipts Offer of discounts for early payment
© The Federal Market Group March 2003
49
Key Points on Cash Out-Flows
Use of charge accounts, as long as payment is made by the due date
Use of checking accounts with out-of-area banks Do not pay invoices before the scheduled due dates Negotiate contract terms which delay the timing of
payments to subcontractors