County of Placer and Placer Public Employees Organization ...
+ Placer MHSA Integrated 3 Year Planning—Further Conversations July 1, 2014- June 31,2017.
-
Upload
julia-warner -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of + Placer MHSA Integrated 3 Year Planning—Further Conversations July 1, 2014- June 31,2017.
+
Placer MHSA Integrated 3 Year Planning—Further Conversations
July 1, 2014- June 31,2017
The Big Picture… Review MHSA planning
efforts
MHSA Planning timeline
Existing Programs Recommended Process Decisional
New Programs (unspent $)Process Recommendations from
Leadership Committee
Innovation brief
Next Steps
+Review of Planning Elements & Requirements
3-year plan (2014 – 2017)
Based on unspent funds + estimated revenues from State
Stakeholder process Representatives from the County’s constituency groups
(CCW Steering) Involvement in: mental health policy, program planning &
implementation, monitoring, quality improvement, evaluation & budget allocations
Draft plan circulated for 30 days for public comment (Summer/Fall 2013)
Review of Campaign Structure
Four committees/Representatives: Promote Mental Health Awareness – Anno Nakai Outreach and Stigma Reduction—Jennifer Price MHSA Implementation – Janice Leroux Workforce, Education and Training(WET)—Sandy Cretney 2 Mental Health Authority Reps. – Maureen Bauman and
Richard Knecht Campaign Facilitators—Katrina Moser/Christi Meng
Leadership Team: Decisional Team, based on input and guidance from this CCW Steering committee
Current Process and Timeline
Target Pop.+ Outcomes
Outcomes&Target Pops.
Strategies &Programs Draft
Plan
Steering Ideas
Asset mapping
Target Pops served
Outcomes Recomm.
Recommended programs
Staff mapsTo Budget
Eval.Current
Programs
Steering Rec.
Leadership Team decisional
Gaps
AprilMarchDec.
Aug
Oct. 2013
Framework For Priorities
(GAPS)
July
Asset Map For Review
Process Decisions
Funding strategies
Sept.
Input on gap tool
Innovation+
Planning
May/June
+Review of Funding Dynamics
Review of Current MHSA Elements
CommunityServices & Supports
Prevention & Early
InterventionInnovation
WET
Cap Fac. & Tech
Full Service Prt.
Systems Transf.
Crisis Triage
Lake Tahoe
Ready for Success
Bridges to Wellness
Bye Bye Blues
West Slope(PCF)
Tahoe(TTCF)
5 Large Projects
Housing
OngoingOngoing One-Time75% 20% 5%
Forecast MHSA Dollars
State Forecast of Dollars – March 4, 2013
Placer – Revised Forecast of Dollars (including current unspent)
2011
/201
2
2012
/201
3
2013
/201
4
2014
/201
5
2015
/201
6
2016
/201
7
2017
/201
8$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000MHSA Funds
MHSA Program Run Rate
+Process to update MHSA plan and fund ongoing programs
Decision Required
Results inform the new MHSA Plan
Current Programs Process Requesting Approval
All Current
Programs
Meet State GuidelinesAnd County Outcomes ?
RecommendPrograms (At
existing Funded levels)
CCW SteeringReview
YES
CCW Leadership
(Final Decision)
Draft MHSA Plan
RFP after planIs approved
MHSA Eval Team
Programs needing more $’s would apply separately for unspent funds.
Include WET
Recommendation: WET to be included in ongoing CSS program expenses.Ongoing programs will receive 7% COLA next year and 2% annual increase therafter.
Contract DeliverablesOutcomes (qualitative and quant.)
YES
+
“Unspent Funds” Recommendations
1) Funding Allocations2) Process for Decision-making
Results inform the Annual Plan Update
CCW Leadership Committee Recommendations for “unspent” dollars
Support programs for six years It’s a sustainable time frame Higher level first 3 yrs. Lower level next 3 yrs
Include incentives for agencies that leverage other dollars—TBD
Consider Current Programs for Expansion
$1.5m one-time capital facilities and/or housing dollars
Leadership Committee Recommendations for “unspent” funds
“Prudent Use” of the Prudent Reserve
Use MHSA Evaluation team to Review Current Programs basic outcomes
RFP recommendations to formulate in Leadership team or via Contingency Review Panel
Contingency: Volunteer Panel
REVISED Placer Forecast of Unspent Dollars (in millions)
Revision: CSS ongoing expenses to include WET program.
2012
...
2013
...
2014
...
2015
...
2016
...
2017
...
-2.00
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
CSSPEIINNCap. FacWET
REVISED Placer Forecast of Unspent Dollars (in millions)
Revision: CSS now includes WET expenses.Summary: CSS Total 12/13 – 15/16 = $8.94m, shortfall 16/17 – 18/19 = $500kPEI Total 12/13-18/19 = $5.66m
12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19
CSS 8.93 0.91 0.50 0.10 -0.02 -0.15 -0.29
PEI 3.06 0.56 0.52 0.42 0.39 0.37 0.34
INN 0.88 -0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cap. Fac 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
WET 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recommended Allocation Unspent Dollars (in millions)
Allocates more dollars in first three years and slightly less remaining three years
Requirements: CSS 51% or > to FSP and PEI 51% or > to 0-24 yrs. old.
5% to innovation programs
$1.5 million for capital facilities/housing can occur within 10 yr timeframe.
2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/20190.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
WETCap. FacINNPEICSS
Recommended Funding Allocation of Unspent Funds Across Program Areas
Allocated across 6 yrs with first 3 yrs. at a higher level, second 3 yrs. slightly lower.
2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019
CSS 0.00 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.24 1.24 1.24
PEI 0.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.78 0.78 0.78
INN 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cap. Fac 0.25 0.25 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
WET 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
New Program Selection Process --Simplified
MHSA EvaluationCommittee
Request for Proposal
CCW Steering
CCW Leadership
Annual Plan
Update
Program identification
Process
• Gap ideas• Asset map• Funding allocations
Program Strategies
MHSA Criteria
• CSS: 51% > FSP• PEI: 51% > 0 – 24yrs.
• Fallback: volunteer committee
• Outcomes• Target pops.
Innovation
Start conversation next month
Review MHSA criteria
What gap or focus do we want to consider?
Funding level $400 - $450k per year
Funding period: Three-year time frame
Next Steps
Update from today’s meeting
Continue MHSA planning update process
Innovation process discussion Review Program Learning and
strategies conversation