© OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.
-
Upload
alban-ward -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.
![Page 1: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
© OECD
Civil ServiceCivil Service
Julio NabaisSIGMA
UKRAINEUKRAINEGovernance assessmentGovernance assessment
March 2006
Kiev, 5-Jul-06
![Page 2: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
© OECD
Reforming CS - Why?Reforming CS - Why?
Condition of building a modern stateTo provide appropriate governance
to societyTo support economic and social
development
Having a professional, independent and accountable CS as a condition for implementing other major reforms
![Page 3: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
© OECD
Main problematic areas…Main problematic areas…
Current LCS Salary system Training policy Integrity system HRM tools Guidance capacity
…leading to weak professionalism in CS
![Page 4: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
© OECD
Current LCS - problemsCurrent LCS - problems
Adopted before the Constitution… Several (non systematic) amendments
(gaps, overlaps, fragmented) Main areas of problems:
• Scope: unclear• Rights and Duties, recruitment, promotion,
performance appraisal, discipline: vagueness = arbitrariness
• Remunerations – unbalanced The Labour Code ruling part of the CS
statute
![Page 5: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
© OECD
ScopeScope
Scope: unclear
• Different legal acts, from different entities
• Mixture of political and administrative positions
• Lack of consistent criteria to define CS
![Page 6: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
© OECD
Rights & Duties, Recruitment, Rights & Duties, Recruitment, Promotion, Performance appraisal, Promotion, Performance appraisal,
DisciplineDiscipline
Vagueness of the regulation
Arbitrariness in implementation
Weak guarantees
![Page 7: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
© OECD
RemunerationsRemunerations
• Non unitary system
• Complex (scheme of bonuses)
• Room for arbitrariness in defining individual salaries
• Low salaries
![Page 8: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
© OECD
TrainingTraining
Confusing roles (MCSD/NAPA)Lack of consistent needs assessmentPrioritiesFundingEvaluation
![Page 9: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
© OECD
Integrity systemIntegrity system
EthicsCorruption IncompatibilitiesConflicts of interestPatronage
![Page 10: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
© OECD
HRM toolsHRM tools
RecruitmentJob descriptionsPerformance appraisalDisciplineMobilityPromotion – professional developmentMotivation mechanisms
![Page 11: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
© OECD
GuidanceGuidance
At political level:• The President?• The Government?• The Verkhovna Rada?
At administrative level:• The positioning and the role of the
MCSD
![Page 12: © OECD Civil Service Julio Nabais SIGMA UKRAINE Governance assessment March 2006 Kiev, 5-Jul-06.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56649ea75503460f94baa578/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
© OECD
RecommendationsRecommendations
Clarification of institutional responsibilities Redesign the role and positioning of the
MCSD Adopt a new LCS Reform the salary system Review training policy