© Crown copyright Met Office Use of GRIB hazard forecasts in flight planning Bob Lunnon, Aviation...
-
Upload
anthony-hensley -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of © Crown copyright Met Office Use of GRIB hazard forecasts in flight planning Bob Lunnon, Aviation...
© Crown copyright Met Office
Use of GRIB hazard forecasts in flight planning Bob Lunnon, Aviation Outcomes Manager, Met Office
WAFS Science meeting, Washington, April 20th 2009
© Crown copyright Met Office
Introductory comment
• To some, this approach to using the GRIB hazard products might seem obvious
• However, there needs to be very effective dialogue between the various stakeholders (including WAFCs, flight planning companies, airlines, regulators) for cost-effective use of the products to be possible
• We have an opportunity to ensure that all concerned collaborate to ensure optimum use of the products
© Crown copyright Met Office
Use forecast of CAT as an example for other hazards
• We have more experience in forecasting CAT than other hazards, and in verifying our forecasts
• We have estimates of the “cost” of a CAT encounter
• We have done calculations on the total cost of a flight, including “cost” of CAT encounters
• Approach can be extended to other hazards (Cb, icing) if costs are known
© Crown copyright Met Office
Flying from A to B through area of forecast high frequency of CAT
A B
Black in centre of plot indicates area of high frequency of CAT Dark grey in plot indicates area of moderate frequency of CAT
Light grey in plot indicates area of low frequency of CAT This graphic could be either a map or a cross-section
(later we will assume it is a map)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Possible strategies for avoiding areas where forecast CAT is above some threshold
A B
Can in principle choose routes which tangentially touch areas where CAT frequency is above some threshold (with Met Office optimum route system can do this)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Most flight planning systems consider a network of fixed routes
A B
Here we show only routes which realistically might be chosen when flying from A to B (Network of routes may be different scale to CAT areas)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Consider direct route from A to B
Graph at bottom of plot indicates expected frequency of CAT as aircraft flies directly from A to B
A B
© Crown copyright Met Office
Consider route chosen to maximise CAT avoidance
Graph at bottom of plot indicates expected frequency of CAT as aircraft flies from A to B along indicated route
© Crown copyright Met Office
Compare routes
Information in graphs should be generated by flight planning companies and fed to airlines/pilots
© Crown copyright Met Office
Costs of CAT encounters and CAT avoidance
If fly round light grey area, cost of CAT encounters islow, cost of CAT avoidance is high
If fly round black area, cost of CAT encounters is high, cost of CAT avoidance is low
It should be possible to identify CAT avoidance strategy which minimises total cost
© Crown copyright Met Office
CAT avoidance
CAT cost benefit diagram
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Infinity >6% >4% >2%
CAT avoidance strategy
Co
st
Cost of CATencounters
Cost of CAT avoidance
Net cost
Note that a very limited number of flights were used to generate this figure
© Crown copyright Met Office
Information needed to generate cost-benefit graph
• Information on extra distance flown for each avoidance strategy (from flight planning company)
• Information on cost of extra distance flown (from airlines)
• Information on frequency of actual CAT encounters for each avoidance strategy (from WAFC)(depends on accuracy of forecasts)
• Information on cost of CAT encounters (from airlines)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Figures used to generate cost-benefit graph• Study undertaken in 1990s
• Used Met Office Optimum route package to calculate extra distance flown, and extra time to fly additional distance
• Used then price of fuel to derive a cost
• Used verification statistics to derive frequency of CAT encounters
• Used figures from Tom Fahey for cost of CAT encounter
• Avoiding areas of high (>6%) CAT probability was financially “better” than no CAT avoidance
• Our forecasts have improved since then!
© Crown copyright Met Office
Use of hazard data in airline flight planning systems
For any route under consideration calculate time to fly, conventional cost, fuel, as at present
For any route, calculate average forecast CAT frequency
Using data from WAFC, calculate expected frequency of CAT encounters for all prospective routes
Derive cost of CAT encounters for all prospective routes
© Crown copyright Met Office
Optimum routes westbound for 10/12/2008, from 5/12/2008
© Crown copyright Met Office
Questions & answers