© Crown copyright 2006 The Primary Framework for Mathematics Day 1 An introduction.
© Crown copyright 2006 Primary National Strategy Pupil Tracking Systems Tutorial © Crown Copyright...
-
Upload
peter-morgan -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of © Crown copyright 2006 Primary National Strategy Pupil Tracking Systems Tutorial © Crown Copyright...
© Crown copyright 2006
PrimaryNational StrategyPupil Tracking Systems
Tutorial
© Crown Copyright 2006
© Crown copyright 2006
Crown Copyright Statement
• The content of this publication may be reproduced free of charge by schools and local authorities provided that the material is acknowledged as Crown copyright, the publication title is specified, it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. Anyone else wishing to reuse part or all of the content of this publication should apply to OPSI for a core licence.
• The permission to reproduce Crown copyright protected material does not extend to any material in this publication which is identified as being the copyright of a third party.
• Applications to reproduce the material from this publication should be addressed to:
• OPSI, The Information Policy Division,• St Clements House,• 2–16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ• Fax: 01603 723000• e-mail: [email protected]
© Crown copyright 2006
Pupil tracking
• The following presentation is intended to support the implementation of effective pupil tracking systems as promoted through the Primary National Strategy at whole school, class teacher and local authority level
• For each example there is a simple explanation followed by some prompts to support discussions on their effective use
© Crown copyright 2006
Pupil tracking linked to expectations
Developing the capacity of the School Leadership Team through:
• Using data to track pupil progress and set expectations for each year group throughout the year
• Mapping and planning the use of appropriate interventions
• Analyse children’s work and assessments to identify high-value curricular targets
• Link the above to whole school professional development, including relevant subject specific support
© Crown copyright 2006
Pupil tracking linked to expectations
Developing effective use of pupil tracking systems
• Whole school overview - to provision map interventions and set targets for improvement
• Class teacher – for professional dialogue to tackle barriers to learning and accelerate the progress of target groups
• Local Authority – to challenge what can and should be achieved and deploy resources more effectively
N.B., the shaded area indicates the approximate expected end-of-year NC levels for each year group Enter children’s names based on Teacher Assessment and, where appropriate, end-of-year National tests
NC Level 1 NC Level 2 NC Level 3 NC Level 4 NC Level 5 Working towards Level 1 lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
NB Not secure within the NC level so may require additional intervention to ensure progress towards a secure Level 4 at the end of KS2
Whole School
Grey areas indicate the minimum end of year
expectation for children to be on track to achieve Level
4+ by end of Key Stage 2
Yellow areas highlight that children achieving here may still require additional intervention
to ensure progress towards a secure Level
4+ at the end of Key Stage 2
Possible Target Group identified for additional
intervention to accelerate their
progress towards and beyond age-related
expectations
Simply enter each child’s name in the appropriate level at the start of the
academic year
N.B., the shaded area indicates the approximate expected end-of-year NC levels for each year group Enter children’s names based on Teacher Assessment and, where appropriate, end-of-year National tests
NC Level 1 NC Level 2 NC Level 3 NC Level 4 NC Level 5 Working towards Level 1 lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
NB Not secure within the NC level so may require additional intervention to ensure progress towards a secure Level 4 at the end of KS2
Wave 2 PNS Interventions
Further Literacy SupportSpringboard 5
Year 3 Literacy SupportSpringboard 3
Year 6 BoosterSpringboard 6
Early Literacy Support
Springboard 4
N.B., the shaded area indicates the approximate expected end-of-year NC levels for each year group Enter children’s names based on Teacher Assessment and, where appropriate, end-of-year National tests
NC Level 1 NC Level 2 NC Level 3 NC Level 4 NC Level 5 Working towards Level 1 lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper lower secure upper
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
NB Not secure within the NC level so may require additional intervention to ensure progress towards a secure Level 4 at the end of KS2
Are all our children securing level 2 or above by end of
Year 2?
Are all our children securing level 3 or above
by end of Year 4?Are all our children securing level 4 or above by end of
Year 6?
Does each class teacher know about
standards?
How can we plan and manage all the
appropriate interventions for the children that need to make accelerated progress?
Whole School
What about the children working
significantly below age-related
expectations?
What about the children working
above age-related expectations?
What was each child’s attainment at the end of
KS1? Is this where they
should be?
Class/ classes
Teacher/ Teachers
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %36 15 42% 27 75% 24 67% 7 19% 6 17%
NC Level NC Level
Paul
0 0 1Ashley
Ramandeep
Ashley
0 0 3Paul Ashley Sonia
Ramandeep Paul Alice
Ramandeep
2 3 2Ashley Sonia David Charandeep
Sonia Lucy
Audric
2 1 4David Lucy Audric Stacey
Alice Charandeep Sally
Audric David Hezza
Alice Al
3 5 4Lucy Sharon Hezza Sharon Kieren Nita
Charandeep Sally Al Tim Gordon Yolan
Sally Stacey Nita Paul Nicki
Al Felicity Fatima Felicity
4 7 10Sharon Tim Suzie Harry Suzie
Stacey Paul Yolan Latika
Gordon Kieren Nigel
Felicity Gordon Kai
4 6 5Harry Hezza Harry Kai Nigella
Tim Nita Latika
Paul Yolan Fatima
Kieren Nicki
7 5 1Nigel Suzie Nigel Sue
Fatima Nigella Janice
Nicki
Kai
5 2 2Sue Janice Sue David P
Latika June June
Nigella Janice
June
5 3 2David P Karen Karen
Jon Jon
David P
1 3 2Karen Agelina
Jon
2 0 1Angelina Agelina
1 1 0
Year 6 Approximate age expectation based on ongoing Teacher Assessment and National Tests
6T
Enter pupil names and the total number of pupils per NC level
Potential group of under-performing children to accelerate progress - *NB Lower Level 4 at end of KS2 is
not a secure Level 4 moving into Year 7
Mrs Tatchel
Pupil Tracking Sheet Reading
Cohort size
Baseline on track for L4+ Potential on track for L4+ Actual on track for L4+ Baseline on track for L5+ Actual on track for L5+
Autumn Spring Summer
5 upper
5 upperNumber Number Number
5 secure
5 secureNumber Number Number
5 lower
5 lower
Number Number Number
4 upper
4 upper
Number Number Number
4 secure
4 secure
Number Number Number
4 lower
4 lower
Number Number Number
3 upper
3 upper
Number Number Number
3 secure
3 secure
Number Number Number
3 lower
3 lower
Number Number Number
2 upper
2 upper
Number Number Number
2 secure
2 secureNumber Number Number
2 lower
2 lowerNumber Number Number
Below Level
2
Below Level
2Number Number Number
Year 6 Class teacher
Simply enter each child’s name against their
achievement at the start of the academic year and
then enter the total number of children for
each NC levelNB If children arrive or leave throughout the academic year simply
add/ delete and adjust the totals
The potential on track indicates the number and percentage if the children in the Target Group make accelerated progress by the end of the academic
year
The totals are automatically calculated to show the number and percentage of children working at age-related
expectations or above at the start of the academic
year
The number and percentage for the
potential Level 5s are also calculated
Using ongoing Teacher Assessment, update grids
in the spring term
At the end of the academic year enter the
achievement for each child
The end of year totals are automatically calculated
Class/ classes
Teacher/ Teachers
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %36 15 42% 27 75% 24 67% 7 19% 6 17%
NC Level NC Level
Paul
0 0 1Ashley
Ramandeep
Ashley
0 0 3Paul Ashley Sonia
Ramandeep Paul Alice
Ramandeep
2 3 2Ashley Sonia David Charandeep
Sonia Lucy
Audric
2 1 4David Lucy Audric Stacey
Alice Charandeep Sally
Audric David Hezza
Alice Al
3 5 4Lucy Sharon Hezza Sharon Kieren Nita
Charandeep Sally Al Tim Gordon Yolan
Sally Stacey Nita Paul Nicki
Al Felicity Fatima Felicity
4 7 10Sharon Tim Suzie Harry Suzie
Stacey Paul Yolan Latika
Gordon Kieren Nigel
Felicity Gordon Kai
4 6 5Harry Hezza Harry Kai Nigella
Tim Nita Latika
Paul Yolan Fatima
Kieren Nicki
7 5 1Nigel Suzie Nigel Sue
Fatima Nigella Janice
Nicki
Kai
5 2 2Sue Janice Sue David P
Latika June June
Nigella Janice
June
5 3 2David P Karen Karen
Jon Jon
David P
1 3 2Karen Agelina
Jon
2 0 1Angelina Agelina
1 1 0
Year 6 Approximate age expectation based on ongoing Teacher Assessment and National Tests
6T
Enter pupil names and the total number of pupils per NC level
Potential group of under-performing children to accelerate progress - *NB Lower Level 4 at end of KS2 is
not a secure Level 4 moving into Year 7
Mrs Tatchel
Pupil Tracking Sheet Reading
Cohort size
Baseline on track for L4+ Potential on track for L4+ Actual on track for L4+ Baseline on track for L5+ Actual on track for L5+
Autumn Spring Summer
5 upper
5 upperNumber Number Number
5 secure
5 secureNumber Number Number
5 lower
5 lower
Number Number Number
4 upper
4 upper
Number Number Number
4 secure
4 secure
Number Number Number
4 lower
4 lower
Number Number Number
3 upper
3 upper
Number Number Number
3 secure
3 secure
Number Number Number
3 lower
3 lower
Number Number Number
2 upper
2 upper
Number Number Number
2 secure
2 secureNumber Number Number
2 lower
2 lowerNumber Number Number
Below Level
2
Below Level
2Number Number Number
What next?
Have all the target group achieved the age-related curricular target?
What are the barriers to
achievement that need to be
addressed?
How can I use whole class and group work to
accelerate their progress?
Year 6 Class teacher
Which interventions will best support the
accelerated progress of this group?
What are the key gaps in their learning?
What did they achieve at the end of KS1?
What about the children with SEN or more
able?
© Crown copyright 2006
LA accountability
LA monitoring and evaluation
• Capturing pupil progress data at class/ school level and using information to improve effectiveness of support, challenge and accountability at LA level
ISP Schools 2006/07 Eng Maths Eng Maths Eng Maths Num % Num % Num % Num % Num % Num % Num % Num %
1 School A 66 47 76 82 0 0 35 23 66% 27 77% 13 37% 24 69% 19 55% 27 77% 18 51% 28 80%
2 School B 63 63 81 70 0 0 35 20 57% 23 66% 19 54% 24 69% 20 57% 24 69% 18 51% 25 71%
3 School B 44 60 67 74 0 0 28 14 50% 19 68% 11 39% 19 68% 13 46% 19 68% 8 29% 21 75%
4 School C 75 56 70 68 0 0 44 31 70% 35 80% 27 61% 32 73% 29 66% 33 75% 23 52% 30 68%
5 School D 47 41 64 53 0 0 20 8 40% 12 60% 8 40% 12 60% 8 40% 12 60% 4 20% 10 50%
6 School E 70 51 64 64 0 0 53 28 53% 36 68% 22 42% 36 68% 25 47% 36 68% 17 32% 34 64%
7 School F 52 52 70 75 0 0 15 5 33% 9 60% 4 27% 8 53% 5 33% 9 60% 6 40% 8 53%
8 School G 95 65 76 82 0 0 13 9 69% 11 85% 9 69% 7 54% 8 62% 7 54% 8 62% 7 54%
9 School H 48 29 82 87 0 0 45 23 51% 30 67% 19 42% 28 62% 23 51% 30 67% 13 29% 27 60%
10 School I 59 42 62 62 0 0 59 32 54% 42 71% 25 42% 41 69% 29 49% 41 69% 20 34% 35 59%
347 193 56% 244 70% 157 45% 231 67% 179 52% 238 69% 135 39% 225 65%
Actual L4+ Target L4+ ReadingActual L4+
Amber
MathematicsJul-06 Jul-07 Jul-07 Baseline
Writing Overall EnglishBaseline Predicted
Local Authority self-evaluation judgement
Red/Amber/Green
Amber
Green
Red
Red
Green
Red
Amber
Green
Green
NB English predictions should be a 'best fit' based
on reading / writing End of Key Stage 2
Y6 Cohort size
Local Authority aggregated data
Predicted Predicted Baseline Predicted Baseline
Local Authority
Enter each school’s actual 2006 results for
English and mathematics
Enter each school’s 2007 targets for English and
mathematicsUsing the school’s tracking information,
enter the total number of children for each Year 6
cohortNB other year groups are
also provided
Using the school’s tracking information,
enter the total number of children on track for
reading, writing, English and mathematics at the
start of the academic year
Using the school’s tracking information,
enter the total number of children expected to be
on track for reading, writing, English and
mathematics at the end of the academic year
Enter each school’s actual 2007 results for
English and mathematics at the end of the academic year
The LA aggregated totals are automatically
calculated
ISP Schools 2006/07 Eng Maths Eng Maths Eng Maths Num % Num % Num % Num % Num % Num % Num % Num %
1 School A 66 47 76 82 0 0 35 23 66% 27 77% 13 37% 24 69% 19 55% 27 77% 18 51% 28 80%
2 School B 63 63 81 70 0 0 35 20 57% 23 66% 19 54% 24 69% 20 57% 24 69% 18 51% 25 71%
3 School B 44 60 67 74 0 0 28 14 50% 19 68% 11 39% 19 68% 13 46% 19 68% 8 29% 21 75%
4 School C 75 56 70 68 0 0 44 31 70% 35 80% 27 61% 32 73% 29 66% 33 75% 23 52% 30 68%
5 School D 47 41 64 53 0 0 20 8 40% 12 60% 8 40% 12 60% 8 40% 12 60% 4 20% 10 50%
6 School E 70 51 64 64 0 0 53 28 53% 36 68% 22 42% 36 68% 25 47% 36 68% 17 32% 34 64%
7 School F 52 52 70 75 0 0 15 5 33% 9 60% 4 27% 8 53% 5 33% 9 60% 6 40% 8 53%
8 School G 95 65 76 82 0 0 13 9 69% 11 85% 9 69% 7 54% 8 62% 7 54% 8 62% 7 54%
9 School H 48 29 82 87 0 0 45 23 51% 30 67% 19 42% 28 62% 23 51% 30 67% 13 29% 27 60%
10 School I 59 42 62 62 0 0 59 32 54% 42 71% 25 42% 41 69% 29 49% 41 69% 20 34% 35 59%
347 193 56% 244 70% 157 45% 231 67% 179 52% 238 69% 135 39% 225 65%
Actual L4+ Target L4+ ReadingActual L4+
Amber
MathematicsJul-06 Jul-07 Jul-07 Baseline
Writing Overall EnglishBaseline Predicted
Local Authority self-evaluation judgement
Red/Amber/Green
Amber
Green
Red
Red
Green
Red
Amber
Green
Green
NB English predictions should be a 'best fit' based
on reading / writing End of Key Stage 2
Y6 Cohort size
Local Authority aggregated data
Predicted Predicted Baseline Predicted Baseline
Do the school predictions
meet or exceed the
school targets?
Do the Local Authority
aggregates show value for
the level of support?
Who in the Local Authority needs to know
this information?
How are we going to deploy our
resources most effectively to
ensure maximum impact on pupil
progress?
Local Authority
Are the school predictions
ambitious enough?What was the
attainment at end of Key Stage 1?
When is this information challenged
and reviewed in school?
How is this information
quality assured? By whom?
When?
24 13 54% 22 92% 0 0% 14 58% 22 92% 0 0% 14 58% 22 92% 0 0% 15 63% 23 96%
25 18 72% 25 100% 0 0% 19 76% 25 100% 0 0% 19 76% 25 100% 0 0% 20 80% 25 100%
30 18 60% 25 83% 0 0% 12 40% 24 80% 0 0% 15 50% 25 83% 0 0% 25 83% 26 87%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
44 31 70% 35 80% 0 0% 27 61% 32 73% 0 0% 29 66% 33 75% 0 0 23 52% 30 68%
57 42 74% 46 81% 0 0% 32 56% 43 75% 0 0% 37 65% 44 77% 0 0% 41 72% 48 84%
49 27 55% 34 69% 0 0% 20 41% 34 69% 0 0% 24 49% 34 69% 0 0% 28 57% 41 84%
51 35 69% 39 76% 0 0% 27 53% 35 69% 0 0% 30 59% 37 73% 0 0% 39 76% 39 76%
53 27 51% 38 72% 0 0% 28 53% 38 72% 0 0% 27 51% 38 72% 0 0% 32 60% 47 89%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
20 8 40% 12 60% 0 0% 8 40% 12 60% 0 0% 8 40% 12 60% 0 0 4 20% 10 50%
14 7 50% 10 71% 0 0% 6 43% 10 71% 0 0% 6 43% 10 71% 0 0% 8 57% 10 71%
23 11 48% 14 61% 0 0% 8 35% 14 61% 0 0% 9 39% 14 61% 0 0% 16 70% 17 74%
21 14 67% 18 86% 0 0% 14 67% 18 86% 0 0% 14 67% 18 86% 0 0% 14 67% 18 86%
17 4 24% 12 71% 0 0% 4 24% 12 71% 0 0% 4 24% 12 71% 0 0% 7 41% 12 71%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
53 28 53% 36 68% 0 0% 22 42% 36 68% 0 0% 25 47% 36 68% 0 0 17 32% 34 64%
49 19 39% 33 67% 0 0% 23 47% 34 69% 0 0% 20 41% 32 65% 0 0% 19 39% 35 71%
40 18 45% 22 55% 0 0% 11 28% 18 45% 0 0% 15 38% 20 50% 0 0% 22 55% 28 70%
39 28 72% 28 72% 0 0% 26 67% 26 67% 0 0% 27 69% 27 69% 0 0% 30 77% 30 77%
43 24 56% 30 70% 0 0% 20 47% 29 67% 0 0% 22 51% 29 67% 0 0% 23 53% 32 74%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
15 5 33% 9 60% 0 0% 4 27% 8 53% 0 0% 5 33% 9 60% 0 0 6 40% 8 53%
23 14 61% 16 70% 0 0% 13 57% 15 65% 0 0% 14 61% 16 70% 0 0% 11 48% 17 74%
18 9 50% 12 67% 0 0% 9 50% 12 67% 0 0% 9 50% 12 67% 0 0% 6 33% 12 67%
14 11 79% 11 79% 0 0% 10 71% 10 71% 0 0% 11 79% 11 79% 0 0% 11 79% 12 86%
14 7 50% 9 64% 0 0% 7 50% 9 64% 0 0% 7 50% 9 64% 0 0% 9 64% 11 79%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007School G
Cohort size
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Baseline September 06
Reading Writing Overall EnglishActual July
2007Baseline
September 06Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Mathematics
Year 3
Year 2
Year 5
Year 4
Year 6
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007School F
Cohort size
Baseline September 06
Overall English MathematicsBaseline
September 06Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Year 4
Year 3
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Year 2
Reading Writing
Year 6
Year 5
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007School E
Cohort size
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Baseline September 06
Reading Writing Overall EnglishActual July
2007Baseline
September 06Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Mathematics
Year 3
Year 2
Year 5
Year 4
Year 6
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007School D
Cohort size
Baseline September 06
Overall English MathematicsBaseline
September 06Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Year 4
Year 3
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Year 2
Reading Writing
Year 6
Year 5
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06School C
Cohort size
Predicted July 2007
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Year 3
Year 4
Year 2
Reading MathematicsWriting Overall English
At the end of the academic year enter the actual number of children
on track or above for reading, writing, English
and mathematicsUsing the school’s tracking information,
enter the total number of children expected to be
on track for reading, writing, English and
mathematics at the end of the academic year
Year 6 information is automatically populated onto the school overview
Using the school’s tracking information,
enter the total number of children for Year 5, Year 4, Year 3 and
Year 2 cohorts
Using the school’s tracking information,
enter the total number of children on track for
reading, writing, English and mathematics at the
start of the academic year
24 13 54% 22 92% 0 0% 14 58% 22 92% 0 0% 14 58% 22 92% 0 0% 15 63% 23 96%
25 18 72% 25 100% 0 0% 19 76% 25 100% 0 0% 19 76% 25 100% 0 0% 20 80% 25 100%
30 18 60% 25 83% 0 0% 12 40% 24 80% 0 0% 15 50% 25 83% 0 0% 25 83% 26 87%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
44 31 70% 35 80% 0 0% 27 61% 32 73% 0 0% 29 66% 33 75% 0 0 23 52% 30 68%
57 42 74% 46 81% 0 0% 32 56% 43 75% 0 0% 37 65% 44 77% 0 0% 41 72% 48 84%
49 27 55% 34 69% 0 0% 20 41% 34 69% 0 0% 24 49% 34 69% 0 0% 28 57% 41 84%
51 35 69% 39 76% 0 0% 27 53% 35 69% 0 0% 30 59% 37 73% 0 0% 39 76% 39 76%
53 27 51% 38 72% 0 0% 28 53% 38 72% 0 0% 27 51% 38 72% 0 0% 32 60% 47 89%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
20 8 40% 12 60% 0 0% 8 40% 12 60% 0 0% 8 40% 12 60% 0 0 4 20% 10 50%
14 7 50% 10 71% 0 0% 6 43% 10 71% 0 0% 6 43% 10 71% 0 0% 8 57% 10 71%
23 11 48% 14 61% 0 0% 8 35% 14 61% 0 0% 9 39% 14 61% 0 0% 16 70% 17 74%
21 14 67% 18 86% 0 0% 14 67% 18 86% 0 0% 14 67% 18 86% 0 0% 14 67% 18 86%
17 4 24% 12 71% 0 0% 4 24% 12 71% 0 0% 4 24% 12 71% 0 0% 7 41% 12 71%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
53 28 53% 36 68% 0 0% 22 42% 36 68% 0 0% 25 47% 36 68% 0 0 17 32% 34 64%
49 19 39% 33 67% 0 0% 23 47% 34 69% 0 0% 20 41% 32 65% 0 0% 19 39% 35 71%
40 18 45% 22 55% 0 0% 11 28% 18 45% 0 0% 15 38% 20 50% 0 0% 22 55% 28 70%
39 28 72% 28 72% 0 0% 26 67% 26 67% 0 0% 27 69% 27 69% 0 0% 30 77% 30 77%
43 24 56% 30 70% 0 0% 20 47% 29 67% 0 0% 22 51% 29 67% 0 0% 23 53% 32 74%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
15 5 33% 9 60% 0 0% 4 27% 8 53% 0 0% 5 33% 9 60% 0 0 6 40% 8 53%
23 14 61% 16 70% 0 0% 13 57% 15 65% 0 0% 14 61% 16 70% 0 0% 11 48% 17 74%
18 9 50% 12 67% 0 0% 9 50% 12 67% 0 0% 9 50% 12 67% 0 0% 6 33% 12 67%
14 11 79% 11 79% 0 0% 10 71% 10 71% 0 0% 11 79% 11 79% 0 0% 11 79% 12 86%
14 7 50% 9 64% 0 0% 7 50% 9 64% 0 0% 7 50% 9 64% 0 0% 9 64% 11 79%
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007School G
Cohort size
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Baseline September 06
Reading Writing Overall EnglishActual July
2007Baseline
September 06Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Mathematics
Year 3
Year 2
Year 5
Year 4
Year 6
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007School F
Cohort size
Baseline September 06
Overall English MathematicsBaseline
September 06Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Year 4
Year 3
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Year 2
Reading Writing
Year 6
Year 5
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007School E
Cohort size
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Baseline September 06
Reading Writing Overall EnglishActual July
2007Baseline
September 06Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Mathematics
Year 3
Year 2
Year 5
Year 4
Year 6
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007School D
Cohort size
Baseline September 06
Overall English MathematicsBaseline
September 06Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Year 4
Year 3
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Year 2
Reading Writing
Year 6
Year 5
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06School C
Cohort size
Predicted July 2007
Predicted July 2007
Actual July 2007
Baseline September 06
Predicted July 2007
Year 3
Year 4
Year 2
Reading MathematicsWriting Overall EnglishHow are we going to deploy our
resources most effectively to
ensure maximum impact on pupil
progress?
How is this information
quality assured? By whom?
When?
When is this information challenged
and reviewed in school?
Who in the Local Authority needs to know
this information?
Is this school on a trajectory for improvement towards and
beyond the floor targets?
Information is automatically populated
onto the LA cohort overview
The LA aggregated totals are automatically
calculated
How are we going to deploy our
resources most effectively to
ensure maximum impact on pupil
progress?
Are the LA predictions
ambitious enough?What was the
attainment at end of Key Stage 1?
Who in the Local Authority needs to know
this information?
Do the Local Authority
aggregates show value for
the level of support?