© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting Arnie Milstein, MD, MPH Pacific Business Group on Health...
-
Upload
jessica-denier -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of © 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting Arnie Milstein, MD, MPH Pacific Business Group on Health...
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting
Arnie Milstein, MD, MPHPacific Business Group on HealthMercer Human Resource Consulting
Disease Management in Transition: Benefit Plan Purchasers Awaken
May 13, 2003
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 2Pacific Business Group on Health
Process Perfection
Performance Assessment:
(Results)
Performance Assessment:
(Best Practices)
Purchasing of Activity
Customer Understanding
Vocabulary Enrootment
Benefits Management Innovation Cycle:Chronicling Disease Management
Labeling
1985
~ 1990~ 2010
~ 2002
~ 1995
~ 2000
~ 2005
& 2015
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 3Pacific Business Group on Health
Disease Management Lineage
Second wave of re-thinking health care
Catalyzed by Breslow observation that health outcomes primarily determined by patient behavior and patient environment
Most MDs and hospitals do not yet feel responsible for these two determinants
Initially delivered by separate “backstage providers,” but next equilibrium is unpredictable
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 4Pacific Business Group on Health
Today’s Benchmark “Backstage” Providers
Health promotion
Major behavioral risk reduction
Minor illness coaching
Disease and case management
Major decision support
Utilization review and case management
Hospitalists
Managed Rx
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 5Pacific Business Group on Health
Important Distinguishing Characteristicsfor all Backstage Providers
Integration with frontstage providers
Psychological mindedness
Focus on manageability of elevated risk
Use of statistical process control
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 6Pacific Business Group on Health
Prior to Process PerfectionEarly Impact on Care Costs is Variable
Estimated Percentage PointPremium Reduction
1. Health Promotion 0.1% 1.7% 5.2%
Low Performance
MiddlePerformance
HighPerformance
2. Behavioral Risk Reduction -1.0% 0.7% 3.4%
3. Self-care / triage -0.1% 0.2% 1.2%
6. Decision-support 0.1% 0.4% 1.0%
4. DM — major event prevention -0.1% 0.2% 0.8%
5. DM — ongoing symptom mgmt -0.1% -0.0% 0.2%
Total -0.3% 5.2% 16.3%
7. UM / Case Management 0.0% 0.4% 1.4%
8. Hospitalists 0.8% 1.6% 3.1%
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 7Pacific Business Group on Health
The Pivotal 2002-2006 Period
Purchasers and consumers in financial pain
IOM blows whistle on care discontinuities and “quality chasm”
Herd leading purchasers, awaken and set new course
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 8Pacific Business Group on Health
Continued tepid incrementalism
Exhortation of professionals
Government as purchaser or regulator
Boost market sensitivity to plan performance
Boost market sensitivity to performance of providers and treatments
Options For Chasm Crossing
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 9Pacific Business Group on Health
Gear consumer decision support and incentives to drive selection of better-performing providers, including “backstage providers,” and treatments (AKA “Consumerism”)
Expand performance-based provider payment via gain-share when performance improvement hurts all providers’ margins (P4P)
Boost Market Sensitivity to Performance of Providers & Treatments
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 10Pacific Business Group on Health
Performance Disclosure: The Critical Path from Disclosure to Performance Breakthrough
Performance comparisons for providers
& Tx
Market sensitivity to performance
Clinical re-engineering by
providers
Q 50 ppts
$ 40 ppts
Value of Health Benefits
Key Evolutionary Steps
High
Low
2002 2012
Performance Disclosure
Consumerism& P4P
Chasm Crossing
Americans
© 2003 Mercer Human Resource Consulting 11Pacific Business Group on Health
CARE SYSTEM RE-ENGINEERING IMPERATIVES
• Redesigned care processes• Effective use of information technologies• Knowledge and skills management• Development of effective teams• Coordination of care across patient conditions, services, and
settings over time• Use of performance and outcome measurement for continuous
quality improvement and accountability
CARE SYSTEM
Supportive market environment
• Safe• Effective• Efficient• Personalized• Timely• Equitable
1Adapted from Crossing the Quality Chasm, IOM, 2001.
Organizations that facilitate the work of patient-centered teams
High performing patient-centered teams
EMPLOYERS OUTCOMES
GOVT & PLANS
The National Academy of Science’sMore Detailed Map