( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

28
Evaluation of simulated precipitation fields of some MAP events: sensitivity experiments and model intercomparison (1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France (3) RPN, Montréal, Canada (4) ISAC, CNR, Bologna, Italy (5) University of L ’Aquila, Italy (6) University of Milano, Italy (7) University of Munich, Germany E. Richard (1), N. Asencio (2), R. Benoit (3), A. Buzzi (4), R. Ferretti (5), F. Lascaux (1), P. Malguzzi (4), S. Serafin (6), G. Zängl (7), J-F. Georgis (1)

description

Evaluation of simulated precipitation fields of some MAP events: sensitivity experiments and model intercomparison. E. Richard (1), N. Asencio (2), R. Benoit (3), A. Buzzi (4), R. Ferretti (5), F. Lascaux (1), P. Malguzzi (4), S. Serafin (6), G. Zängl (7), J-F. Georgis (1). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Page 1: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Evaluation of simulated precipitation fields of some MAP events: sensitivity experiments

and model intercomparison

(1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France(2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France(3) RPN, Montréal, Canada(4) ISAC, CNR, Bologna, Italy(5) University of L ’Aquila, Italy(6) University of Milano, Italy(7) University of Munich, Germany

E. Richard (1), N. Asencio (2), R. Benoit (3), A. Buzzi (4), R. Ferretti (5), F. Lascaux (1), P. Malguzzi (4), S. Serafin (6), G. Zängl (7), J-F. Georgis (1)

Page 2: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France
Page 3: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

1. Sensitivity experiments based upon Meso-NH

IOP2a 17 September 1999: A short, intense, isolated, convective

event70 mm within 12h

Page 4: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

14:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:0024:00

Page 5: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

RADAR Reflectivity Z 2000mRADAR Reflectivity Z 2000m

OBSERVATIONOBSERVATION MESO-NH COMPUTATIONMESO-NH COMPUTATION

The convective system of MAP - IOP 2a (17 September, 1999, hourly time evolution)

Toce Ticino watershed

Page 6: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

ECMWF: OP. ANA ECMWF: OP. ANA 19991999

ARPEGE: OP. ANA. 1999ARPEGE: OP. ANA. 1999 ECMWF: REANALYSISECMWF: REANALYSIS

RADAR OBSERVATIONS

Page 7: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

ANA. OP. 1999ANA. OP. 1999 REANALYSISREANALYSIS

850hPa water vapor mixing ratio : 17 September 1999 12UTC

IOP 2a

REANA (NO MAP REANA (NO MAP DATA)DATA)

Page 8: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

ECMWF: OP. ANA ECMWF: OP. ANA 19991999

ARPEGE: OP. ANA. 1999ARPEGE: OP. ANA. 1999 ECMWF: OP. ANA. ECMWF: OP. ANA. 20022002

ECMWF: REANALYSISECMWF: REANALYSIS

MAP - IOP2A: Intense Convection Strong sensitivity to initial stateLow predictability

RADAR OBSERVATIONS

Page 9: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

1. Sensitivity experiments based upon Meso-NHIOP2a 17 September 1999: A short, intense, isolated, convective event70 mm within 12h

2. Model intercomparison : MC2, MM5, MOLOCH,Meso-NHIOP2b 20/21 September 1999:Orographic enhancement of a frontal system 200 mm within 30h

Page 10: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

19 Sept. 1999 12:00 20 Sept. 1999 12:00

METEOSAT infrared

Page 11: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

The different models:• MESO-NH 10 KM + 2.5 KM• MOLOCH 10 KM + 2 KM• MM5-RE 27 KM + 9 KM + 3 KM• MM5-E1 18 KM + 6 KM + 2 KM• MC2 40 KM + 10 KM +2 KMInitial and boundary conditions from

ECMWF operational analysesFrom 19 Sep. 12 UTC to 20 Sep. 18 UTC(30 hours)

Page 12: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

MAP - IOP2B - 19-20 Sep. 1999Intercomparison exercise4 non-hydrostatic models with horizontal resolution of 2 to 3 kmInitialization based upon ECMWF operational analysisAccumulated precipitation from the 19th 15 UTC to the 20th 18UTC

Toce-Ticino watershed

Page 13: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France
Page 14: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Rain gauges

Time evolution of the mean hourly precipitation rate

Radar

Page 15: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Heidke skill scores as a function of precip. class

1h precip. 27h precip.

Page 16: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Comparison with rain gauge measurements (121 points)

Correlation 1h

Correlation 6h

Correlation 27h

Mean Bias

MESONH 0.33 0.49 0.62 + 28 % MOLOCH 0.31 0.47 0.62 - 22 % MM5-RE 0.27 0.43 0.55 - 16 % MM5-E1 0.37 0.53 0.63 + 28 %

MC2 0.30 0.47 0.63 - 32 %

Page 17: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Conclusion: Two contrasted MAP events !!

IOP 2a

– Meso-NH results indicate a srong sensitivity to the analysis

– The best results are not obtained for the « best analysis »

– What is the part of luck ?– Is this conclusion model dependent?– Ideal test for mesoscale assimilation

experiments.

Page 18: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

IOP 2b

– Very good consistency of the accumulated precipitation pattern

– Model results over/under estimate the total precipitation by a factor ranging from +30% to -30%

– The bias may be related to the level of smoothing applied to the model orography

– The accuracy of the model precipitation is rather weak for the hourly rainfall but fairly reasonable for the precipitation accumulated over the 30h time period of the event

– Radar derived precipitation are not yet very accurate

Page 19: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

The End !Interested ??

Join the MAP working group on Numerical Modellinghttp://www.aero.obs-mip.fr/map/MAP_wgnum

Page 20: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Model Topography : Dx = 2KM

MC2: Max 3483m

MM5: Max 3979m

Page 21: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Sensitivity to the topography

MAX: 512 mm MAX: 435 mmMEAN: 78 mm MEAN: 74 mm

Page 22: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Heidke skill scores as a function of precip. class

1h precip. 27h precip.

Sensitivity to the topography

Page 23: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Sensitivity to the analysis

ECMWF Op. Analysis MAP Reanalysis

Max: 512 mm Max: 482 mm Mean: 78 mm Mean: 87 mm

Page 24: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Heidke skill scores as a function of precip. class

1h precip. 27h precip.

Sensitivity to the analysis

Page 25: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Time evolution of the correlation coeffecient (wrt rain gauges)

MM5 experiments

Page 26: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Time evolution of the correlation coeffecient (wrt rain gauges)

MM5 experiments

Page 27: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

MM5 experiments

Page 28: ( 1) LA CNRS/UPS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Météo-France, Toulouse, France