Post on 28-Dec-2015
Zhoujian CaoInstitute of Applied Mathematics, AMSS 2013-10-23
Workshop on Collapsing Objects, Fudan University
Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations for Numerical Relativity
Outline
• Features of numerical relativity code AMSS-NCKU
• Motivation for generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
• Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations for numerical relativity
• Summary
NR code AMSS-NCKU
• Developers include: Shan Bai (AMSS), Zhoujian Cao (AMSS), Zhihui Du (THU), Chun-Yu Lin (NCKU), Quan Yang (THU), Hwei-Jang Yo (NCKU), Jui-Ping Yu (NCKU)
• 2007-now
2+2:
Characteristic formulation
Formulations implemented
• BSSNOK [Shibata and Nakamura PRD 52, 5428 (1995), Bau
mgarte and Shapiro PRD 59, 024007 (1998)]
• Z4c [Bernuzzi and Hilditch PRD 81, 084003 (2010), Cao and Hil
ditch PRD 85, 124032 (2012)]
• Modified BSSN [Yo, Lin and Cao PRD 86, 064027(2012)]
• Bondi-Sachs [Cao IJMPD 22, 1350042 (2013)]
Mesh refinement
Mesh refinement
Parallel structured mesh refinement (PSAMR), co work with Brandt, Du and Loffler, 2013
Mesh refinement
Hilditch, Bernuzzi, Thierfelder, Cao, Tichy and Brugeman (2012)
Code structureMPI + OpenMP + CUDA
Outline
• Features of numerical relativity code AMSS-NCKU
• Motivation for generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
• Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations for numerical relativity
• Summary
BBH models for GW detection
Comparison between our result and calibrated EOB model
t
Cowork with Yi Pan (2012)
BBH models for GW detection
?????
Last problem for BBH model
Simulation efficiency (speed):
• PSAMR
• GPU
• Implicit method [Lau, Lovelace and Pfeiffer PRD 84,
084023]
• Cauchy characteristic matching [Winicour Livi
ng Rev. Relativity 15 (2012)]
Last problem for BBH model
Simulation efficiency:
• PSAMR
• GPU
• Implicit method [Lau, Lovelace and Pfeiffer PRD 84,
084023]
• Cauchy characteristic matching [Winicour Livi
ng Rev. Relativity 15 (2012)]
1. Touch null infinity without extra computational cost
2. Save propagation time
T for Cauchy
T for chara
Cauchy-Characteristic matching (CCM)
• Many works have been contributed to CCM [Pittsburgh, Southampton 1990’s]
• But hard to combine!
difficulty 1. different evolution scheme
difficulty 2. different gauge condition
Existing characteristic formalisms
• Null quasi-spherical formalism
S2 of constant u and r should admit standard spherical metric
Existing characteristic formalisms
• Southampton Bondi-Sachs formalism
Existing characteristic formalisms
• Pittsburgh Bondi-Sachs formalism
Relax the form requirement, but essentially r is the luminosity distance parameter
Existing characteristic formalisms
• Affine Bondi-Sachs formalism
In contrast to luminosity parameter, affine parameter can be matched to any single layer of coordinate cylinder r
Outline
• Features of numerical relativity code AMSS-NCKU
• Motivation for generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
• Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations for numerical relativity
• Summary
Generalized Bondi-Sachs formalism
Requirements:
1. is null
2. is hypersurface forming
In contrast to the existing Bondi-Sachs formalism, the parameterization of r is totally free
A,B = 2,3
guarantees that we can use main equations only to do free evolution
Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
In order to be a characteristic formalism, we need nested ODE structure, fortunately we have!
Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
There is no term involved, so for given , it’s ODE
Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
There is no term involved, it’s second order ODE system
i,j = 1,2,3
Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
Generalized Bondi-Sachs equations
There is no term involved, it’s ODE system
Given on
get
get
get
update to
Cowork with Xiaokai He (2013)
Given on
update to
1. Nested ODE structure
2. Facilitate us to use MoL which makes us to evolve Cauchy part and characteristic part with the same numerical scheme [Cao, IJMPD 22, 135042 (2013)]
Gauge variable 1.There is no equation to control
2. is related to parameterization of r
is a gauge freedom, it is possible to use this freedom to relate the gauge used in inner Cauchy part for CCM
Possible application of GBS to CCM
Cauchy Characteristic
Cartesian Spherical
Design equation to control by try and error
Summary
• Feature of AMSS-NCKU code• Efficiency problem in BBH model• CCM can improve efficiency, but the
existing characteristic formalisms face difficulties of different numerical scheme and gauge to Cauchy part
• Generalized BS formalism may help to solve these difficulties through the introduction of gauge freedom