Wikipedia – The Free Encyclopedia

Post on 14-Jan-2016

114 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Wikipedia – The Free Encyclopedia. Petr Kadlec http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mormegil. 16 th Annual Conference of EINIRAS , 25/09/2006. What is Wikipedia?. Freely licensed encyclopedia Available in more than 100 languages Czech (cs), English (en), de, fr, … - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Wikipedia – The Free Encyclopedia

Wikipedia – The Free EncyclopediaPetr Kadlec

<petr.kadlec@gmail.com>

http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mormegil

16th Annual Conference of EINIRAS, 25/09/2006

2 / 20

What is Wikipedia?

• Freely licensed encyclopedia

• Available in more than 100 languages– Czech (cs), English (en), de, fr, …

• Written by volunteers

• The English edition started 15/01/2001

http://www.wikipedia.org/

3 / 20

Reading Wikipedia

4 / 20

Editing Wikipedia

5 / 20

How a wiki works

• Every page contains an “edit” link

• Simple formatting syntax (wikicode)– '''bold''', ''italic'', [[link]] etc.

• Page history: revisions, authors, diffs

• Recent changes, watched pages

• Categories, what links here, …

6 / 20

Edit history

7 / 20

Examining differences (“diff”)

8 / 20

Community, rules

• A community of users (“wikipedians”)– Anarchy, democracy, meritocracy, …

• Various forms of communication– Talk page next to each article– Project pages, Village Pump– E-mailing users– IRC channels, mailing lists

9 / 20

Rules

• Basic rules– Neutral Point of View (NPOV)– No original research– Verifiability– Free content (GNU FDL)

10 / 20

Sysops, fighting vandalism

• There are many fools on the Internet…

• “Soft security”

• Easily reverting changes through history

• Sysops– No power, only technical measures– Deleting pages, blocking vandals,

protecting pages, simplified reverting

11 / 20

Problems

• Vandalism– Not a critical problem

• Human conflicts, trolls, flamewars, …

• POV pushers– Bit of a problem

12 / 20

Quality and trustworthiness

• Infinite monkey theorem?

• Without credible authors of content? rules for verifiability etc.

• Warning templates

• Systemic error• The articles are written by young,

technically apt people from the West

13 / 20

Quality surveys

• c’T (2004): Wikipedia gegen Brockhaus und Encarta– Wikipedia 3.8 pts, both remaining 3.6 pts.

• Nature (2005): Internet encyclopaedias go head to head– Considering number of errors, Wikipedia is worse

than Encyclopaedia Britannica only by a small margin

– (EB disagreed)

14 / 20

Growth rate

15 / 20

Czech Wikipedia growth rate

16 / 20

Popularity increase

17 / 20

Growth rate, financing

• Exponential growth

• Only voluntary donations, sponsoring, grants etc.

• Absolutely no advertising at the moment

• 2005 budget: $739,200

• …and much more this year…

18 / 20

Software & hardware

• MediaWiki (http://www.mediawiki.org)

• GNU GPL

• Linux, PHP, MySQL, Apache, Squid

• Clusters, over 100 servers around globe

• Currently peeks about 20 K HTTP req/s

19 / 20

Organization, other projects

• Wikimedia Foundation

• Other projects– Commons (http://commons.wikimedia.org)– Wiktionary (http://www.wiktionary.org)– Wikiquote (http://www.wikiquote.org)– Wikinews (http://www.wikinews.org)– Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikispecies

“We make the Internet not suck”

– Jimmy Wales

Thank you for your attention

Contact:http://cs.wikipedia.org/Petr Kadlec <petr.kadlec@gmail.com>