Post on 26-May-2015
description
GCCSI WebinarROAD project- CO2 Capture plant FEED study
Elvira Huizeling
November 22, 2011
Page 2
Agenda
1. Introduction
2. FEED study scope and boundaries
3. Capture Plant Process & Design
4. HSE
5. CO2 stream, compression
6. Financials and planning
Page 3
1. Introduction
Page 4
ROAD means...
Rotterdam
Opslag
Afvang
Demonstratieproject(Rotterdam Storage and Capture Demonstration)
Page 5
Co-operating Partners ROAD
• Maasvlakte CCS Project C.V. is a joint venture of:• E.ON Benelux
• Electrabel Nederland (GDF SUEZ Group)
• In co-operation with intended partners:• TAQA Energy
• GDF SUEZ E&P
• With financial support of:• European Commission (EU)
• Government of the Netherlands
• Global CCS Institute
Page 6
Objectives ROAD
• Demonstrate feasibility (technical, economic) of large-scale, integrated CCS chain
• Capture and storage of ca. 1.1 Mton CO2 per year in (nearly) depleted gas reservoirs in period of 2015 – 2020
• Acquire knowledge and experience with deployment of large-scale, integrated CCS chain:• Technical• Legal• Economic• Organizational• Social
Page 7
20 meters
Power plant(Maasvlakte)
CO2capture
compression
pipeline 20 km over seabed (North Sea)
pipeline5 km onshore(Maasvlakte)
3,5 km
PlatformP-18A
Not on scale
ROAD CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage Chain
CO2 storage in depleted gasreservoirs
Page 8
MPP3 location Capture Location: Maasvlakte Power Plant 3
Page 9
CO2 Capture Unit
• Technology: post-combustion
• Size: 250 MW equivalent
• Capture rate: 90%
• CO2 capture:
1.1 mln tonne/yr
• Operational: 2015
Page 10
CO2 Transport: 5 km onshore, 20 km offshore
Page 11
CO2 Storage Location
• Depleted gas reservoir P18
• Operator: TAQA
• Depth: 3,500 m
• Capacity: 35 mln tonne
• Available: 2014
• Alternatives / future expansion options
are being investigated (EOR)
Page 12
Other GCCSI reports (soon to be) available
– Capture technology selection methodology
– Permitting process
– Mitigating project risk & handling business risk
– Stakeholder management
– Execution strategy
Page 13
2. FEED study scope and boundaries
Page 14
Boundary of this work
• In this report you can find a short inventarisation on all topics relevant for taking a Final Investment Decision, based on GCCSI know-how
• Work reported here is about Capture Front End Engineering and Design (FEED), not about complete project
• Integration with power plant is included
Page 15
CCS Project Development Framework
Page 16
Base installation
• E.ON Maasvlakte Power Plant 3 (Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
• Output : 1.070 MWe
• Efficiency : 46% (LHV)
• Operational : End 2012
• Capture ready (conform TÜV NORD requirements)
Page 17
17
CCS@MPP3 – Overview Interfaces
Carbon Capture
MPP3
Solvent
Caustic Soda
Flue gas
Instrument air
Flue gas condensate
LP-steam
(steam) condensate
CW supply
Electric power
CW to outletpond
Treated Flue gas
Demin water
Heated condensate
Cold Condensate
Nitrogen
CO2 to storage
Reclaimer waste
Page 18
3. Capture plant process and design
Page 19
19
CCS-MPP3: Process Scheme CC-Plant
Electric
Power
Controls
Drinking water
Fire water
Storm water
Sewage
Page 20
Page 21
Impact of the capture plant on the power plant process, Efficiency in (LHV)
Parameter Unitwithout
Carbon Capture with
Carbon Capture
Electrical Output (Gross) MW 1,117 1,086
Electrical Output (Net) MW 1,069 1,012
Electrical Efficiency (Net) % 46.3 43.9
Specific CO2 emission g/kWh 755 641
Cooling demand Power Plant MW 1,090 985
Cooling demand Carbon CapturePlant
MW 0 161
Overall Cooling demand MW 1,090 1,146
Page 22
22
CCS@MPP3 - Layout
Page 23
Plot plan
STACK
Direct
Contact
Cooler
Blower
Absorber
Stripper
CO2 compressor
Page 24
4. HSE
Page 25
Requested permit values
Component Yearly value
(6% O2)
[mg/Nm3]
Mass flow
[tonnes per
year]
Yearly value
(6% O2)
[mg/Nm3]
Mass flow
[tonnes per
year]
MEA 11 6.2 2.0 6.2
NH31 5.0 2.8 1.0 3.1
NOx as NO2 77.6 44.0 70.0 215.0
SO2 0 0 31 95.0
HCl 3.7 2.1 2.9 9.0
HF 0.5 0.3 0.4 1.3
CxHy 23 13 10 31
Fly ash 2 1.1 3.3 10
CO2 - 18,000 - 687,000
Operational situation:
100% flue gas through CC-Plant
Operational situation:
ca. ¼ flue gas through CC-Plant
EIA: Tabel 3.5: Emission in stack (MPP3 and CC-Plant)
1) NO2
based on
5% of NOx
Page 26
Other streams to consider for permit
• Water• Process water• Cooling water• Demineralized water
• Waste• Other chemicals
• Sodium hydroxide• Solvent • Hydrogen• Nitrogen• Activated Coal
• Noise
Page 27
HAZID
• Hazid was performed in June 2010 and three actions still remained for EPC phase
• First item is already picked up in discussions with authorities
No: Description: By: Due: Response: By: Date:
7
Discussions with authorities need to be opened
to discuss impact of capture plant on operating
permit, with respect to emissions. JV Project EPC
10
Capture plant and MPP3 operators to be trained
regarding emergency response planning. JV operations EPC
20
Ensure all power lines are identified prior to any
excavation or piling work. Construction EPC
Page 28
5. CO2 Stream and compressor
Page 29
CO2 stream specification
• The boundaries of the CO2 specification have been defined
• Purity of CO2 99.9%
• From all elements produced in post combustion capture plant only H2O and O2 are of any relevance.
• Details like the trip values still have to be determined (at which amount of for example H2O and O2 the plant must be stopped?)
• Most important is the temperature and pressure of the stream to determine the phase of the stream
Page 30
Compressor will operate in supercritical areaAssumed operating conditions
for ROAD:
Pressure max 129 bar (a)
T between 40 and 80 °C
Page 31
6. Financials and planning
Page 32
CAPEX for Capture plant of 250 MWe excl. integration
The capital cost estimate breakdown for the capture plant is as follows:
• Equipment: 60 – 70 MM Euro
• Materials and Labor: 65 – 75 MM Euro
• Engineering: 15 – 20 MM Euro
• Indirect Field Costs: 5 – 10 MM Euro
• Owner’s costs (Operator training & first fills): 1 – 2 MM Euro
• Financial and other costs: 25 – 35 MM Euro
• Total: 170 – 210 MM Euro
Page 33
Operating costs capture plant, including steam (Million of Euro, 2010 Euros)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Staff costs 2,1 1,9 1,9 2,0 2,0
Variable costs 18,5 21,1 23,9 24,1 24,3
Maintenance 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,8 2,8
Other costs 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5
Total operating costs 24,7 27,2 29,9 30,3 30,7
Power price assumed:
55 €/MWh
Page 34
Construction Schedule
Page 35
Time Path and Milestones
14 July 2009 : EU project proposal submission
September 2009 : Project selection by EU
May 2010 : Grant decision by Government of the Netherlands
September 2010 : Publication starting note Environmental Impact Assessment
Q4 2011 : EIA and permit procedures
2013 : Power plant (MPP3) operational
2015 : Integrated CCS chain operational
2015-2020 : Demonstration phase CCS chain
Page 36
Maasvlakte CCS Project C.V.
Parallelweg 1
3112 NA Schiedam
www.road2020.nl