The ‘political economy’ of India’s Urban Environment: a few thoughts

Post on 12-Jan-2016

22 views 1 download

Tags:

description

iihs. The ‘political economy’ of India’s Urban Environment: a few thoughts. Aromar Revi New Delhi 25 th March 2011. The 21 st century Indian city: Developing an agenda for Urbanisation. www.iihs.co.in. Mumbai: minimum city…. Slums in the City. Mumbai: a cross-section of Slums. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The ‘political economy’ of India’s Urban Environment: a few thoughts

The ‘political economy’ of India’s Urban Environment: a few thoughts

www.iihs.co.in

Aromar Revi

New Delhi 25th March 2011

The 21st century Indian city: Developing an agenda for Urbanisation

Mumbai: minimum city…

Bharat Nagar and other slums, Raoli Junction Ekvira Nagar, Salt pan land

Ganesh Murty Nagar

Near Airport

Slums in the CityMumbai: a cross-section of Slums

Mumbai’s Slum Services: Water Supply

Bharat Nagar Shanti Nagar

Dharavi Ambedkar Nagar

Chikhalwadi

Mumbai’s Slum Services: Solid Waste

Unhygienic surroundings, Anna Nagar

Garbage dumping place, Andhra AssociationGarbage Bin, Near Khotwadi

Clean Street, Dadabhai Chawl

Mumbai’s formal & informal Land Price differentials

Average developed land and property value by ward, 2005

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

Ward Name

Va

lue

(R

s.p

er.

sq

m)

Average developed land value(FSI-1) Rs. per.sq.m

Average property value Rs.per.sq.m

Land value of studied slumsRs. per.sq.m

Colaba

Peddar Road

Ghatkopar

Mulund

Bandra

Mumbai’s (imputed) land market value estimated in 2005 at ~ Rs. 560,000 crores. Distortions in this market primary factor in the huge (55%+) city slum population

Outcome Mumbai: the slum capital of the world

• 7 million+ people living in ‘slums’• Dysfunctional land & housing

markets• Declining quality of public services

& security• Tardy transformation of landuse &

economic functions• Declining quality of governance• Ecological footprints expanding

across the subcontinent• Steady decline in resource-use

efficiency • Increasing polarisation of wealth

this is clearly unsustainable …

Open Defecation: 0.5 million people per day in Mumbai

RECOMMENDED CONCEPT OPTION: MMR 2031

““City Of City Of Islands”Islands”

Comparative long-range Urbanisation trends

(1950-2050)

Urbanisation trends: India, China & the USA (1950-2050)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Urb

an

isati

on

rate

(%

of to

tal p

op

ula

tion

)

Years

World China India USAUN World Urbanisation Prospects, 2007

India: an dramatic opportunity for balanced RUrban development

Global Health Risk forecast by risk factor (2005-2060)

Source: Hughes et. al., 2011, Improving Global Health, Forecasting for the next 50 Years

The Dynamics of Indian Urbanisation

(1951-2031)

1951

> 5

1 - 5

0.5 - 1

0.1 – 0.5

< 0.1

Population Size (millions)

Source: Census of India, 1971- 2001 UN, 2007 IIHS analysis, 2009-10

India

W. Pakistan

E. Pakistan

Nepal

Tibet

Kolkata(15.5)

Delhi(16.9)

Chennai(7.5)

Bangalore(7.2)

Hyderabad(6.7)

Ahmadabad(5.7)

Pune(5.0)

2011

Mumbai(20)

Large Urban Settlement Growth

Urban Population Growth

> 5

1 - 5

0.5 - 1

0.1 – 0.5

< 0.1

Population Size (millions)

Source: Census of India, 1971- 2001 UN, 2007 IIHS analysis, 2009-10

Mumbai(28.6)

Kolkata(22.3)

Delhi(24.4)

Chennai(11.1)

Bangalore(10.6)

Hyderabad(9.9)

Ahmadabad(8.5)

Pune(7.4)

Surat(6.3)

Kanpur(5.1)

2031

Large Urban Settlement Growth

Urban Population Growth

> 5

1 - 5

0.5 - 1

0.1 – 0.5

< 0.1

Population Size (millions)

Source: Census of India, 1971-2001 UN, 2007 IIHS analysis, 2009-10

The Growth of India’s Urban Economy(1991-2031)

Rs. 1450 lakh crores

Indian Cities & the global 21st century Sustainability

transition

Present consumption requires ~2.0 worlds

21st century Population growth needs 1.5+ worlds

Ending poverty at present throughput ~2.0 worlds

Availableonly OneWorld

The Challenge of the 21st century Sustainability Transition

This transition will be played out in Indian & Chinese cities

20th century pre-emption of ‘ecological space’ (1900-2004)

Cumulative Carbon emissions over the 20th century potentially pre-empts ecological & hence human development ‘space’ in the global South

∆ Order of Magnitude +

Can Services-sector led growth enable a Sustainability Transition?

Services-sector growth led to very different outcomes in the US, Japan & Germany. China has chosen a conventional manufacturing-export led strategy unlike India

Ecological Footprint vs. HDI (1975)

‘Sustainable Development’

The ‘holy grail’ of national Sustainable Development a HDI of ~ 0.9 & Ecological Footprint of 1 global Ha/per capita

The Sustainability transition will be fought & won in cities

Early 21st century ‘tunnelling through’ will be fought and won in Asian and ‘emerging economy’ urban areas and around new metabolisms, economies and sufficiencies

‘Sustainable Development’

Can China traverse the environmental Kuznets curve; Germany & USA converge without serious Human Development decline India ‘tunnel through’;

or will there be serious international ‘resource’ conflict?

Future History - Sustainability Transitions: 2005

A new form of urbanisation?

India’s Settlement structure matched to deliver Climate adaptation & mitigation co-benefits

~ 7,800 urban areas and ~ 0.55 million rural settlements in 20011 – the opportunity for decentralised production and consumption systems and economic structure

Revi, 2010

Environmental SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability

Social TransformationSocial Transformation

Unified & Robust PolityUnified & Robust Polity

‘Inclusive’ Economic Growth‘Inclusive’ Economic Growth

Reduced Poverty and InequalityReduced Poverty and Inequality

Catalysing five national outcomes by the 2030s

Who really ‘manages’ Urban India?Top Management• MPs & MLAs 5,300• Higher Judiciary 650• IAS & IPS 8,200• CXOs (top 500 corporates) ~ 5,000• NGO leadership ~ 1,750Total 20,900

% educated & trained in urban practice < 5%

Middle Management• Senior Municipal officials ~ 4,000• Senior Engineers ~ 8,000• Urban Planners ~ 2,000Total ~ 14,000

% educated & trained in urban practice < 20%