The Megamaser Cosmology Project

Post on 02-Feb-2016

28 views 1 download

Tags:

description

The Megamaser Cosmology Project. Jim Braatz NRAO. Co-I’s: Mark Reid Lincoln Greenhill Fred Lo Jim Condon Christian Henkel Ingyin Zaw Avanti Tilak Lei Hao - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Megamaser Cosmology Project

Jim BraatzNRAO

Co-I’s: Mark Reid Lincoln Greenhill Fred Lo Jim Condon Christian Henkel

Ingyin Zaw Avanti Tilak Lei Hao Cheng-Yu Kuo Liz Humphreys

The Megamaser Cosmology Project

The Impact of an H0 Prior on CMB Models

H0 = 72 ± 3r ± 7s km s-1 Mpc-1

H0 = 62 ± 1r ± 5s km s-1 Mpc-1

Freedman et al. 2001

Sandage et al. 2006

Independent measurement of H0 is required to constrain the cosmological model.

WMAP Likelihood Surfaces

Water masers in AGN Accretion Disks

UGC 3789: Braatz & Gugliucci 2008

• H2O emission at 22 GHz

• N(H2) ~ 108 - 1010 cm-3

• T ~ 400 - 1000 K

Measuring Distances to H2O Megamasers

• NGC 4258 is the prototype for the maser distance method

• BUT this galaxy is too close to determine H0 directly

• Nearby maser galaxies like NGC 4258 can be used to recalibrate the Cepheid scale

NGC 4258

2Vr

2

D = r/

a = Vr2/r

D = Vr2/a

Vr

Herrnstein et al. (1999)

D = 7.2 0.5 Mpc

The Megamaser Cosmology Project

• In the framework of cosmology set by analysis of CMB anisotropies, a precise measurement of H0 will provide a strong constraint on the equation of state parameter, w, of dark energy.

• The MCP is an NRAO “Large Project” with the goal, in about 5 years, of determining H0 to 3% by measuring angular diameter distances to about 10 galaxies in the Hubble flow.

The Process:

1. Survey with the GBT to identify maser disk galaxies2. Image the sub-pc disks with the High Sensitivity Array (VLBA+GBT+EB)3. Measure accelerations in the disk with GBT monitoring4. Model the maser disk dynamics and determine distance to the host galaxy

Progress in Megamaser Surveys

• 112 Extragalactic maser galaxies are now known

• About 30% have h.v. components > 250 km s-1

• About 10% are disk masers and are candidates for high precision distance measurements

• Primary sample for new surveys: Type 2 AGNs from SDSS

GBT Spectra of Maser Disks

UGC 3789

MBH ~ 1.0 x 107 Msun from acceleration analysis

Braatz and Gugliucci, 2008

UGC 3789

UGC 3789

Reid et al, in prep.

UGC 3789

Braatz et al, in prep.

PreliminaryProperties of UGC 3789 Maser Disk

R ~ 0.09 - 0.20 pc (0.40 - 0.87 mas)V ~ 750 - 450 km/sMbh ~ 1.2 x 107 Msun

a ~ 3.6 km s-1 yr-1 (mean value)

D ~ 51 Mpc (15%)H0 ~ 65 km s-1 Mpc-1

NGC 6323

Backup Slides

The Extragalactic Distance Scale

Cepheids Direct Measurement of H0

0 Mpc 100 Mpc 200 Mpc

NG

C 4

258

UG

C 3

789

NG

C 6

323

IC 2

560

NG

C 1

194

NG

C 3

393

Mrk

141

9

Larg

est

Str

uctu

res

• One method covers all scales out to the size of largest structures• Maser distances can be used to calibrate other distance methods

e.g. Cepheids, SN Ia, Tully-Fisher

• The CMB on its own does not measure many fundamental parameters; instead there are degemeracies. E.g. Ωmh2

• Independent measurement of H0 is necessary

•“The single most important complement to the CMB for measuring the DE equation of state at z ~ 0.5 is a determination of the Hubble constant to better than a few percent.”Hu 2005

The CMB and Cosmology

Spergel et al., 2007 (WMAP 3-yr)

The Accretion Disk in NGC 4258

Humphreys et al. 2008(CfA group)

• Warp in the disk is fully characterized

• Accelerations measured in both systemic and h.v. features

• Blue features absorbed by gas in the disk

• Disk characterization reduces systematic error in distance determination

• Alternative to LMC to anchor the extragalactic distance scale

A GBT Gallery of Extragalactic H2O masers

Braatz and Gugliucci, 2008, ApJ, 678, 96

Measuring Distances to H2O Megamasers

The Prototype: NGC 4258

2Vr

2

D = r/

a = Vr2/r

D = Vr2/a

Vr

Herrnstein et al. (1999)

D = 7.2 0.5 Mpc

Herrnstein et al. 1999

NGC 6323

• Precision measurement of disk geometry– Substructure: striation and spiral structure– What fraction of the disk do masers trace? (skin structure)

• Accurate characterization of the disk is critical to minimize systematic errors– Constraints on blended systemic features– Elliptical orbits?– Distinguish phase effects from maser clump effects

• Proper motion measurements? (~ 3 µas yr-1 for UGC 3789)

• Sensitivity (and flex scheduling) is essential (Baselines to GBT, EVLA, EB)

Disk Masers in the Era of VSOP-2